Likkutei Torah · Parshas Vayikra · Maamar 5
ביאור הדברים הנ״ל ע״פ ולא תשבית מלח וגו׳
An Explanation of the Above, on “And You Shall Not Omit the Salt”
Biur · an explanation of maamar 4Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
The essence of the soul, which is above intellect, is united with the essence of G‑d through Torah study, because the Infinite Light is clothed in the Torah’s wisdom. The revealed Torah is “bread,” whose essence the mind can grasp; the inner Torah is “salt,” which has no taste of its own yet gives the whole its taste, brings fear of sin, and refines and elevates the animal soul.
The maamar in brief
Explaining the preceding discourse on the salt of the offerings, the maamar first shows that intellect, and even will, are only vessels for the soul’s essence, simple light; so too supernal Chochmah is only a vessel for the Infinite Light, which reconciles the Rambam’s “He is the Knowledge” with the Maharal’s objection. Since the Infinite Light rests in the Torah’s wisdom, binding the mind to a law of the Torah unites the soul’s essence with G‑d’s, as self-sacrifice does; prayer and the Shema must come first, so that the heart truly wants this. The revealed law, whose physical subject the mind fully grasps, achieves this most; Scripture, Aggadah and Kabbalah are grasped only in their existence, yet reach higher. This explains the division of study into thirds and the image of bread, meat and salt. Salt, rooted in the Gevuros of Abba, destroys evil, preserves good and sweetens judgment; it is the “covenant” that blends the worlds. The maamar explains why matzah, the “bread of poverty” of simple faith, is unsalted, and ends with the sailors who make a way through the sea, and the Splitting of the Sea.
Outline
- The soul above its intellectIntellect and will are vessels for the soul’s simple essence; supernal Chochmah is a vessel for the Infinite Light; the Rambam and the Maharal are both right; the Yechidah is rooted above Chochmah.¶1–4
- Self-sacrifice and Torah studySelf-sacrifice comes from the soul’s essence; since the Infinite Light is clothed in the Torah’s wisdom, Torah study unites the soul’s essence with G‑d and so answers “with all your might.”¶5–8
- Torah study in self-nullificationThe sages’ ceaseless study; the Torah clothed in physical laws; nullification as the opposite of making a “void”; the kav and the future revelation; study for the Torah’s sake, preceded by the Shema and prayer, and joined with kindness.¶9–16
- Revealed Torah and KabbalahIn revealed law the mind grasps the essence of G‑d’s wisdom, in Kabbalah only its existence; Pri Etz Chaim maps Scripture, Mishnah, Talmud and Kabbalah onto the four worlds; why, then, study the inner Torah? Scripture counts even without understanding.¶17–22
- Scripture, the inner Torah and the thirds of studyScripture draws down a light from above Chochmah through its letters alone; the Aggados and the Kabbalah belong with Scripture; the division of study into thirds; the revealed Torah as bread and meat and the inner Torah as salt.¶23–30
- Salt, fear of sin and the covenantMidrash brings fear of sin; a glimpse of a higher level surpasses the essence of a lower one; salt as a covenant of love above reason; the wheat and the chumtin; bread with salt, the thirst of love and the remedy of water; salt for the offerings that refine the animal soul.¶31–39
- Salt that destroys and preservesThe Gevuros of Abba; the animal soul’s offering need only be salted; salt as water and fire, Chesed and Gevurah; the blue light that consumes the separate and enlivens the nullified; Elisha’s salt and the lower waters raised to living waters.¶40–48
- Sweetening judgment and the bread of povertySalt heals the bitter waters of the animal soul and sweetens the judgments of Elokim; salt as three Names Havayah, cholem and strength; why matzah, the bread of poverty and simple faith, has no salt until Daas makes it rich.¶49–57
- The covenant that blends the worldsThe Maggid’s teaching: Aharon’s covenant of salt blends the worlds; Sinai as the wedding of upper and lower; the night of watching and matzah as the receiver waiting; salt belongs to the offerings, after the light is drawn down.¶58–66
- The sailors and the Splitting of the SeaSouls cross the hidden “sea” in ships of Torah and mitzvos steered by the divine flow; the yoke of heaven before the yoke of mitzvos; the Splitting of the Sea, by the light of Keser, makes the sea dry land, the seventh day of Pesach.¶67–71
Key concepts
- The essence of the soulעצמיות הנפש
- The soul itself, a simple light above its ten powers; intellect, emotions and even will are only its vessels or garments.
- Chochmah as a vesselחכמה כלי לאור א״ס
- Even supernal Chochmah is only a vessel for the Infinite Light; yet in Atzilus G‑d is wholly one with it, so that a person who grasps the Torah’s wisdom is united with G‑d.
- Grasping the essence and knowing the existenceהשגת המהות וידיעת המציאות
- In the revealed law the mind grasps what a thing is; in Kabbalah and Scripture it knows only that something exists, yet that knowledge reaches a higher source.
- Saltמלח
- The inner Torah and the fear of G‑d: it has no taste of its own but gives taste, destroys evil and preserves good, sweetens judgments, and is the “covenant” that blends upper and lower.
- Bread of povertyלחם עני
- Matzah: the stage of simple faith without understanding, like the moon that has nothing of its own, which must later be enriched with Daas.
- The hidden world and the revealed worldעלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא
- The “sea” and the “dry land”: the realm of concealed G‑dliness, crossed in the ships of Torah and mitzvos, and the revealed realm in which we live.
The soul above its intellect ¶1–4
An explanation of the matters mentioned above, on the verse “And you shall not omit the salt,” etc.
This maamar is a further explanation of the discourse mentioned above on Leviticus 2:13, “And you shall not omit the salt of the covenant of your G‑d from upon your meal-offering.” It sets out to explain more fully the ideas raised there.
The heading presents the maamar as an explanation of the earlier discourse on the verse about the salt of the covenant.
According to the Kehot note, this maamar is from the year 5571 (1810–11). Another transcript of it is in Sefer HaMaamarim 5571, from a manuscript in the Tzemach Tzedek’s hand; a version with changes by the Tzemach Tzedek is printed in Or HaTorah, Inyanim, and part of it appears in the series Mayim Rabbim of 5636.
Marei mekomos
- 1ביאור . . ולא תשבית · מאמר זה הוא משנת תקע״א. הנחה אחרת בסה״מ תקע״א מגוכתי״ק הצ״צ. מאמר זה בשינויים מכ״ק אדהצ״צ נדפס באוה״ת-ענינים ע׳ רפח, ומתחיל: ענין העבודה ומצות ת״ת. חלק מהמאמר נמצא ג״כ בהמשך מים רבים תרל״ו פרק קפה ראה בהנסמן להלן ד, ג שו״ה חכמתו.
- 2
2הנה בס׳ של בינונים פ״ג [פרק ג׳] נתבאר1 בענין הנפש שהיא כלולה מעשר בחינות כנגד ע״ס [עשר ספירות] עליונות2 כו׳, וכן פי״ב נת׳ [נתבאר] מהות ועצמות נפש3 האלהית שהן עשר בחינותיה4 כו׳.
Now, in Sefer shel Beinonim [Tanya], chapter 3, it is explained concerning the soul that it is composed of ten levels corresponding to the supernal Ten Sefiros, etc.; and likewise in chapter 12 there is an explanation of the essence and very being of the G‑dly soul, which are its ten levels, etc.
The Alter Rebbe begins from his own Tanya, also called Sefer shel Beinonim (“the Book of the Intermediates”). Chapter 3 there says that each soul is made of ten powers parallel to the Ten Sefiros, and chapter 12 calls these ten powers the essence of the G‑dly soul.
אך באמת חסר שם ולא נתבאר איך שגם החכמה שהיא ראשית שבעשר בחינות הנ״ל הוא רק בחי׳ כלי בלבד לעצמיות ומהות הנפש.
But in truth something is missing there, and it was not explained how even Chochmah (wisdom), which is the first of the ten levels mentioned above, is only the level of a vessel, nothing more, for the very being and essence of the soul.
Here he says that account left something out: even Chochmah, the highest of the soul’s ten powers, is only a vessel for the soul’s true essence, not the essence itself.
כמו שהמוח הגשמי הוא רק כלי לכח השכל והחכמה המתפשט מהנפש. כך עד״ז כח השכל שבנפש הוא רק כלי למהות ועצמיות הנפש.5 (ועמ״ש בד״ה פתח אליהו).6
Just as the physical brain is only a vessel for the power of intellect and wisdom that extends from the soul, so too, in the same way, the power of intellect in the soul is only a vessel for the essence and very being of the soul. (And see what is written in the discourse beginning “Pasach Eliyahu” [“Eliyahu opened”].)
The analogy: the physical brain is only the instrument through which the soul’s intellect works, and in the same way intellect is only the instrument through which the soul’s essence expresses itself. In Torah Ohr, Vayera, in the discourse “Pasach Eliyahu,” the Alter Rebbe explains that the soul in itself is simple light, and that its intellect and emotions are its garments, the “tikkunim” in which it arrays itself.
אבל לא שהשכל הוא ממהות ועצמיות הנפש. שהרי השכל אינו שוה באדם בכל עת שפעמים צלול דעתו ופעמים לא כן עד שפעמים ידבר שטותים וא״כ יש בהשכל שינויים רבים,
But [it is] not that the intellect is of the essence and very being of the soul. For a person’s intellect is not the same at all times: at times his mind is clear and at times it is not, to the point that at times he will speak nonsense; if so, there are many changes in the intellect.
The proof that intellect is not the soul’s essence is that it changes. A person thinks clearly at one time and not at another, and may even talk nonsense, while the essence of the soul does not change.
ולכן א״א לומר שהשכל הוא עצמיות הנפש ממש ושעצמיות הנפש הוא רק עשר בחינותי׳ [בחינותיה] שהן שכל ומדות או אפי׳ [אפילו] לומר שהיא מציאות א׳ והוא שכל אלא שהשכל הוא רק כלי לבד
Therefore it is impossible to say that the intellect is the actual very being of the soul, and that the very being of the soul is only its ten levels, which are intellect and emotive attributes (middos), or even to say that it is a single entity and that [entity] is intellect; rather, the intellect is only a vessel, nothing more.
So one cannot identify the soul with its intellect, nor define it as nothing more than its ten powers of intellect and emotion, nor even call it a single faculty that is intellect. Rather, intellect is only a vessel.
ואפילו בחי׳ רצון שיש בנפש למעלה מהשכל כמו ענין שתוק כך עלה7 כו׳ ג״כ נק׳ קרקפתא או גלגלתא דחפיא על מוחא שהוא גם כן בחי׳ כלי
And even the level of will that is in the soul, above intellect, like the matter of “Be silent; so it arose [in thought],” etc., is also called the karkafta, or the gulgalta (skull) that covers the brain, which is also the level of a vessel.
Even will, which stands above intellect, is only a vessel. The Talmud’s “Be silent; so it arose in thought,” G‑d’s answer to Moshe about Rabbi Akiva’s death, expresses a will beyond reasons; in Kabbalah this level is called the karkafta or gulgalta, the skull that covers the brain, an image of something that surrounds the intellect as a vessel.
(ולכן אנו רואים שהשכל הולך ומתגדל שהתינוק שכלו קטן ביותר וכשמתגדל מעט מעט כך יתוסף הגדלת שכלו ומדותיו וזקני ת״ח [תלמיד חכם / תלמידי חכמים] כל מה שמזקינין דעתן מתיישבת89 כו׳.
(Therefore we see that the intellect keeps on growing: an infant’s intellect is very small, and as he grows little by little, so the growth of his intellect and his emotive attributes increases; and as for elderly Torah scholars, the more they age, the more settled their mind becomes, etc.
A proof from experience, in parentheses: intellect grows. A baby’s mind is tiny and develops as he grows, and the Mishnah teaches that elderly Torah scholars become more settled in mind as they age.
והרי הנשמה היה בו גם מקטנותו ואם כן למה היה אז שכלו קטן. אלא הענין כי הנשמה עצמה היא למעלה מהשכל. והשכל הוא כח המתפשט ממנה וכדי שיהיה נמשך המשכה והתפשטות זה אל הגילוי הוא כשיש כלי להכיל
Yet the soul was in him from his infancy as well; if so, why was his intellect small then? Rather, the point is that the soul itself is above intellect, and intellect is a power that extends from it. And for this drawing-forth and extension to be drawn into revelation, [this happens] when there is a vessel to contain [it],
Yet the soul is present from infancy, so if intellect were the soul, a baby would have a full mind. The answer is that the soul itself is above intellect; intellect is a power that radiates from it and becomes revealed only to the extent that there is a vessel to receive it.
דהיינו כלי המוח שהוא כלי לאור השכל אזי הכלי הוא ממשיך לתוכו גילוי אור וכח השכל ובקטן מצד קטנות מוחו השכל מאיר בקטנות מאד כו׳, אבל הנשמה עצמה מלובשת בו גם מקטנותו ותחלת התהוותו).
namely, the vessel of the brain, which is a vessel for the light of intellect. Then the vessel draws into itself the revelation of the light and power of intellect; and in a small child, because of the smallness of his brain, the intellect shines in a very small measure, etc. But the soul itself is enclothed in him from his infancy and from the very beginning of his coming into being.)
That vessel is the brain. A child’s small brain lets only a small measure of intellect shine, but the soul itself is fully present in him from the moment he begins to exist.
והנה מהות ועצמות הנפש היא חלק אלוה10 שאינו בגדר עשר בחינות שיש להן גדר מיוחד אלא אור פשוט כו׳,
Now, the essence and very being of the soul is “a part of G‑d,” which is not within the bounds of ten levels, which have a specific definition; rather, [it is] a simple light, etc.
The essence of the soul is “a part of G‑d above” (Job 31:2). It is not defined by the ten powers, each of which has its own particular character, but is simple, undivided light.
וכן כתב הגאון מהר״ל [מהרוצה לומר] מפראג זצ״ל [זכר צדיק לברכה] בהקדמתו לס׳ גבורות ה׳ ד״ג ע״ג [עמוד ג׳] וז״ל [וזה לשונו] ואולי יאמרו אם אין עצמותו שכל וגשם11 ח״ו [חס ושלום] לומר עליו אם כן מהו יתברך.
And so wrote the Gaon, the Maharal of Prague, may the memory of the righteous be a blessing, in his introduction to the book Gevuros Hashem, folio 3, column c; and these are his words: “Perhaps they will say: if His essence is not intellect — and body, G‑d forbid to say [it] of Him — then what is He, may He be blessed?
Support comes from the Maharal of Prague (Rabbi Yehudah Loew), in his introduction to Gevuros Hashem. He anticipates a question: if G‑d’s essence is not intellect, and He is certainly not a body, what is He?
נשיב להם וכי הנשמה שבגוף האדם יוכל לעמוד על אמתתה. כל שכן וכל שכן בורא הכל שאין לשאול עליו קושיא זאת כי לא יראני האדם וחי12 עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו].
We shall answer them: can [one] come to know the true nature of the soul that is in a person’s body? All the more so, all the more so the Creator of all, about whom one may not ask this question, ‘for man shall not see Me and live.’” End of his words.
The Maharal answers that a person cannot grasp the true nature even of his own soul; how much less can he ask what the Creator is, of whom it is said, “Man shall not see Me and live” (Exodus 33:20).
הרי ביאר שהנשמה עצמה היא למעלה ממהות שכל. והנה כמ״כ [כמו כן] יובן מזה הנמשל למעלה (כמ״ש הגאון הנ״ל) בענין ע״ס [עשר ספירות] עליונות לגבי המאציל א״ס ב״ה.
Thus he has explained that the soul itself is above the essence of intellect. Now, likewise, from this one will understand the analogue above (as the Gaon mentioned above wrote), concerning the supernal Ten Sefiros in relation to the Emanator, the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He.
From the Maharal’s words it follows that the soul is above intellect. The Alter Rebbe now applies this upward: as the soul is to its powers, so the Infinite One is to the supernal Sefiros.
או שכמו שהוא למעלה כך הוא למטה בנפש (כמ״ש נעשה אדם בצלמנו13 כו׳ דקאי על הנשמה ועיין בשל״ה [בשני לוחות הברית] ד״ט וד״י [וד׳ יסודות]) שאפילו בחי׳ חכמה עילאה דאצילות היא רק בחי׳ כלי לבד לאור א״ס ב״ה,
Or [put otherwise]: as it is above, so it is below in the soul (as it is written, “Let us make man in Our image,” etc., which refers to the soul; and see the Shelah, folio 9 and folio 10). [That is,] even the level of supernal Chochmah of Atzilus is only the level of a vessel, nothing more, for the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He,
Or, seen the other way, the soul below mirrors the order above, since “Let us make man in Our image” (Genesis 1:26) refers to the soul; the text also points to the Shelah (Shnei Luchos HaBris, by Rabbi Yeshayah Horowitz). Even supernal Chochmah of Atzilus, the first of the Sefiros, is only a vessel for the Infinite Light.
אבל אינה עצמיותו של המאציל ב״ה כי הוא פשוט בת כלית הפשיטות, משא״כ בחי׳ חכמה הוא איזה מהות וגדר מיוחד.
but it is not the very being of the Emanator, blessed be He; for He is simple with the utmost simplicity, whereas the level of Chochmah is some specific essence and definition.
Chochmah cannot be G‑d’s essence, because it has a definite character, while G‑d is utterly simple and beyond every definition.
The paragraph argues that intellect, and even will, are only vessels for the essence of the soul, which is simple light above its ten powers. It then applies the same to G‑d: even supernal Chochmah is only a vessel for the Infinite Light.
A Kehot note adds a further proof: an essence cannot be divided, but the soul has both intellect and emotions, and intellect itself divides into Chochmah and Binah, so these cannot be the indivisible essence of the soul. The Torah Ohr discourse “Pasach Eliyahu” explains why Tanya still calls the soul’s powers its “essence”: only in comparison with thought, speech and action, which are garments wholly separate from the soul; the intellect and emotions are garments too, but they are joined to the soul like the vessels of Atzilus, and so they are called “tikkunim,” the forms in which the soul arrays itself.
Marei mekomos
- 1הנה בס׳ של בינונים פ״ג נתבאר · ראה גם תו״א יג, ג. דרך מצותיך קנה, ב ובאוה״ת ענינים ע׳ קיג. קמג. ועוד.
- 2שהיא כלולה מעשר בחינות כנגד ע״ס עליונות · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 3:1
- 3מהות ועצמות נפש האלקית · ראה סה״מ תקס״ב ע׳ קעט. סה״מ תרפ״ח ע׳ קטו.
- 4מהות ועצמות נפש האלהית שהן עשר בחינותיה · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 12:3
- 5כח השכל שבנפש הוא רק כלי למהות ועצמיות הנפש · ”דהנה שכל ומדות אינם עצם הנפש, אלא לבושים להנפש, והראי׳ שהרי ידוע דכל עצם בלתי מתחלק, ומאחר ששייך שכל ומדות ובשכל גופא יש ג״כ חילוקים חו״ב, ומאחר שיש התחלקות מוכרח לומר שאינו עצם הנפש שהוא בלתי מתחלק”. — ראה בארוכה בסה״מ תרמ״ג ע׳ טו. ד״ה אשרינו תרצ״ו ע׳ 53. בארוכה באוה״ת בראשית כרך ג תקכא, א ואילך.
- 6בד״ה פתח אליהו · תו״א יג, ג.
- 7שתוק כך עלה · Menachot 29b
- 8וזקני ת״ח כל מה שמזקינין דעתן מתיישבת · סוף קנים.
- 9כל מה שמזקינין דעתן מתיישבת · Mishnah Kinnim 3:6
- 10חלק אלוה · Job 31:2
- 11ואולי יאמרו אם אין עצמותו שכל וגשם · Gevurot Hashem, Second Introduction to Gevurot Hashem 18
- 12
- 13כך נעשה אדם בצלמינו · Genesis 1:26
3ואנת חכים1 זהו השפלה וענוה שמשפיל א״ע [את עצמו] כביכול להיות מתלבש בחכמה ואזי איהו וחיוהי וגרמוהי חד2 ולא כמו התלבשות הנפש בשכל.
And “You are wise”: this is a lowering and humility, that He lowers Himself, as it were, to be enclothed in Chochmah; and then “He and His life-forces and His vessels are one,” and [it is] not like the enclothing of the soul in intellect.
The Tikkunei Zohar says of G‑d, “You are wise, but not with a known wisdom.” The Alter Rebbe reads “You are wise” as divine humility: G‑d lowers Himself, as it were, to be clothed in Chochmah, and there the union is complete (“He and His life-forces and His vessels are one”), unlike the way the soul is clothed in its intellect.
ומ״מ הוא רק כלי כו׳. וכמ״ש בס׳ של בינונים דמ״ש הרמב״ם [הרבי משה בן מימון]3 הוא המדע והוא היודע4 כו׳ והודו לו חכמי הקבלה,
Nevertheless, it is only a vessel, etc. And as is written in Sefer shel Beinonim, that what the Rambam wrote, “He is the Knowledge and He is the Knower,” etc., and the sages of the Kabbalah agreed with him,
Even so, Chochmah remains only a vessel. Tanya quotes the Rambam’s statement that G‑d “is the Knowledge and the Knower,” meaning that His knowledge is one with Him, and adds that the sages of the Kabbalah agreed with him.
זהו דוקא בהתלבשות אור א״ס ב״ה ע״י צמצומים רבים בכלים דחב״ד [דחכמה בינה ודעת] דאצי׳ אך לא למעלה מהאצי׳ כו׳.
this applies specifically to the enclothing of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, through many contractions (tzimtzumim), in the vessels of Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atzilus, but not above Atzilus, etc.
Tanya explains that this unity holds only where the Infinite Light is clothed, through many contractions, in the vessels of Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atzilus; above Atzilus G‑d cannot be described as wisdom at all.
כי הנה בהקדמה לספר גבורות ה׳ שם השיג לגמרי עמ״ש הרמב״ם [הרבי משה בן מימון] שהוא המדע כו׳, וז״ל [וזה לשונו]
For in the introduction to the book Gevuros Hashem, there, [the Maharal] completely disputed what the Rambam wrote, that He is the Knowledge, etc.; and these are his words:
The Maharal, in the introduction to Gevuros Hashem, rejected the Rambam’s statement outright, and the Alter Rebbe now quotes him.
אבל הוא ית׳ שקראו רז״ל [רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] בשם הקב״ה ולא נקרא השכל ב״ה כי אמיתת עצמותו לא נודע רק שהוא נבדל מכל גשם וגוף ומכל הנמצאים5
“But He, may He be blessed, whom our Sages, of blessed memory, called by the name ‘the Holy One, blessed be He,’ and who is not called ‘the Intellect, blessed be He’: [this is] because the truth of His essence is not known, only that He is separate from all matter and body and from all existing things.
In the Maharal’s words, the Sages call G‑d “the Holy One, blessed be He,” never “the Intellect, blessed be He,” because His essence is unknown; all that is known is that He is separate from everything.
ועל זה נאמר הקדוש ב״ה שענין קדוש נאמר על מי שהוא נבדל כי הוא יתברך פשוט בתכלית הפשיטות כו׳ יעו״ש [יעויין שם] שהאריך להשיג לגמרי ע״ד הרמב״ם [הרבי משה בן מימון] הנ״ל.
And of this it is said, ‘the Holy One, blessed be He,’ for ‘holy’ is said of one who is separate; for He, may He be blessed, is simple with the utmost simplicity,” etc. See there, where he elaborates in completely disputing the words of the Rambam mentioned above.
“Holy” (kadosh) means separate. So the very name the Sages chose says that G‑d is utterly simple and set apart from every definition, including that of intellect.
אמנם לפי קבלת האריז״ל [האר״י זכרונו לברכה] עולה שדברי שניהם אמת, דבא״ס ב״ה עצמו לא שייך כלל לתאר בחי׳ חכמה כי החכמה נחשבת אצלו כמו עשי׳ [עשיה] ממש וכדברי הגאון מהר״ל [מהרוצה לומר] שלכן נק׳ הקב״ה כנ״ל.
However, according to the Kabbalah of the Arizal, of blessed memory, it emerges that the words of both are true. For of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, Himself, it does not apply at all to describe [Him by] the level of Chochmah, since before Him Chochmah is considered like actual action (asiyah); and [this accords with] the words of the Gaon, the Maharal, that this is why He is called “the Holy One, blessed be He,” as mentioned above.
The Kabbalah of the Arizal shows both views to be true. Of the Infinite One Himself the Maharal is right, for before Him even wisdom is like mere physical action; but as He is clothed in the Sefiros of Atzilus, the Rambam is right that He and His knowledge are one.
The paragraph sets the Rambam’s view, that G‑d is one with His knowledge, against the Maharal’s, that G‑d is beyond intellect, and with Tanya and the Arizal shows that each is true at its own level.
Tanya, chapter 2, in its gloss, draws the same line: the Rambam’s statement, which the Kabbalists accepted, holds for the Infinite Light as it is clothed in the vessels of Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atzilus, but not above Atzilus. In the full passage of Gevuros Hashem the Maharal adds that because G‑d is utterly simple and has no definition, nothing is truly separate from Him.
Marei mekomos
- 1ואנת חכים · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:3–4
- 2איהו וחיוהי וגרמוהי חד · Tikkunei Zohar 3b:9–10
- 3וכמ״ש בס׳ של בינונים דמ״ש הרמב״ם · ראה בארוכה בדרך מצותיך מצות האמנת אלקות מו, ב. מצות עבד עברי פא, ב. פב, א בהג״ה שם. שורש מצות התפלה קל, ב ואילך.
- 4הוא המדע והוא היודע · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 2:4–5
- 5שקראו רז״ל בשם הקב״ה ולא נקרא השכל ב״ה כי אמיתת עצמותו לא נודע רק שהוא נבדל מכל גשם וגוף ומכל הנמצאים · Gevurot Hashem, Second Introduction to Gevurot Hashem 14
4ומ״מ בהתלבשות אור א״ס ע״י צמצומים רבים בכלים דחב״ד [דחכמה בינה ודעת] דאצילות כיון דאיהו וחיוהי וגרמוהי חד בהון1 זהו מ״ש הרמב״ם [הרבי משה בן מימון] שהוא המדע והוא היודע כו׳ וכמאמר התיקונים אנת חכים2 ולא בחכמה ידיעא כו׳.
Nevertheless, in the enclothing of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) through many contractions (tzimtzumim) in the vessels of Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atzilus, since “He and His life-forces and His vessels are one” in them, this is what the Rambam wrote, that “He is the Knowledge and He is the Knower,” etc.; and as the saying of the Tikkunim, “You are wise, but not with a known wisdom,” etc.
The other side of the reconciliation: in Atzilus, where the Infinite Light is clothed in Chochmah, Binah and Daas through many contractions, G‑d is fully one with these vessels. There the Rambam’s “He is the Knowledge and the Knower” is true, and so is the Tikkunei Zohar’s “You are wise, but not with a known wisdom.”
ואם כן מכ״ז [מכל זה] מובן מ״ש שהחכמה הוא רק כלי לאור א״ס ב״ה:
If so, from all this one understands what was said, that Chochmah is only a vessel for the Infinite Light, blessed be He.
So Chochmah is only a vessel for the Infinite Light.
(והנה הגם שבתניא נתבאר3 שהנשמה נמשכה מבחי׳ חכמה שהוא המדע כו׳ כמו שהבן נמשך ממוח האב4 והחכמה היא בחי׳ כלי כנ״ל. אך י״ל [יש לומר] כי אע״פ [אף על פי] שהחכמה היא בחי׳ כלי מ״מ שורה בה עכ״פ [על כל פנים] א״ס ב״ה עצמו שלמעלה מהחכמה וכמ״ש בס׳ של בינונים פל״ה בהג״ה [בהגהה]
(Now, although in the Tanya it is explained that the soul is drawn from the level of Chochmah, which is “the Knowledge,” etc., as a son is drawn from his father’s brain, and Chochmah is the level of a vessel, as mentioned above, it can be said that although Chochmah is the level of a vessel, nevertheless, at any rate, the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, Himself, who is above Chochmah, rests in it, as is written in Sefer shel Beinonim, chapter 35, in the gloss.
A long parenthesis takes up a question: Tanya (chapter 2) says the soul is drawn from Chochmah, as a child is drawn from the father’s brain; if Chochmah is only a vessel, how can the soul be above it? The answer: even though Chochmah is a vessel, the Infinite One Himself, who is above Chochmah, rests in it. The gloss in Tanya, chapter 35, which the Alter Rebbe heard from his teacher, gives the reason: the Infinite One is the true One, He alone and nothing besides Him, and that is the level of Chochmah.
ולכן גם בהנשמה הנמשכת מכלי ח״ע [חכמה עילאה] מלובש גם כן הארה מבחי׳ האור המלובש בכלי הח״ע [החכמה עילאה] דאיהו וחיוהי חד. וכמ״ש באגה״ק [באגרת הקודש]5 משל גשמי לזה כמו בהטפה נמשך בה גם ממהות הנפש ועצמותה המלובשת במוחין ולכן מולידה בדומה לה ממש6 עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו].
Therefore in the soul too, which is drawn from the vessel of supernal Chochmah, there is also enclothed a radiance from the level of the light that is enclothed in the vessel of supernal Chochmah, for “He and His life-forces are one.” And as is written in Iggeres HaKodesh, a physical analogy for this: “As in the drop [of seed], there is drawn into it also [something] of the essence and very being of the soul that is enclothed in the brain (mochin), and therefore it begets [offspring] truly resembling it.” End of quote.
So the soul, drawn from the vessel of supernal Chochmah, also carries a radiance of the light that is clothed in that vessel, since G‑d and His life-forces are one. The analogy is the drop of seed: unlike an ordinary thought, it draws with it something of the very essence of the parent’s soul as it is clothed in the brain, and that is why a parent begets a child truly like himself. The text cites this from Iggeres HaKodesh; the Kehot note places it in Tanya’s Kuntres Acharon, in the essay “To understand what is written in Pri Etz Chaim.”
וזהו שנזכר לעיל שעצמיות ומהות הנשמה הוא למעלה מהשכל כו׳ והשכל אינו רק בחי׳ כלי לבד להנשמה עצמה.
And this is what was mentioned above, that the very being and essence of the soul is above intellect, etc., and the intellect is only the level of a vessel, nothing more, for the soul itself.
This fits what was said above: the essence of the soul is above intellect, and intellect is only its vessel.
אכן באמת בחי׳ יחידה היא נמשכה מלמעלה ממש מהחכמה, ועיין בזוהר ח״ג [חלק ג׳] נשא דקמ״א ע״ב ע״פ ויפח באפיו נשמת חיים7, ועיין בשע״ק [בשערי קדושה] להרח״ו [להרבי חיים ויטאל] ח״ג [חלק ג׳] ש״ב [של בינונים] שהיחידה שרשה מא״ק [מאדם קדמון]
However, in truth, the level of Yechidah is drawn from actually above Chochmah. And see the Zohar, Part III, Naso, folio 141b, on the verse “And He breathed into his nostrils the breath of life”; and see Sha’arei Kedushah by Rabbi Chaim Vital, Part III, Gate 2, that the root of the Yechidah is from Adam Kadmon,
Still, the highest level of the soul, Yechidah (“the single one”), comes from truly above Chochmah. The text points to the Zohar on “And He breathed into his nostrils the breath of life” (Genesis 2:7) and to Rabbi Chaim Vital’s Sha’arei Kedushah, which roots the Yechidah in Adam Kadmon, the first and highest stage of emanation.
והוא למעלה מעלה מהחכמה ועמ״ש על פסוק אלה מסעי89 בענין מוצאיהם למסעיהם,10 ועמ״ש במ״א11 על פסוק ולא אבה12 הוי׳ אלקיך לשמוע אל בלעם בענין האהבה מסותרת שהוא מבחי׳ קוצו של יו״ד שלמעלה מהחכמה כו׳):
which is far, far above Chochmah. And see what is written on the verse “These are the journeys,” concerning “their goings-forth according to their journeys”; and see what is written elsewhere on the verse “But Havayah your G‑d would not listen to Bilam,” concerning the hidden love, which is from the level of the tip (kotz) of the yud, which is above Chochmah, etc.)
Adam Kadmon is far above Chochmah. The parenthesis closes with two cross-references in Likkutei Torah: to the discourse on “These are the journeys” (Masei), where Adam Kadmon is called “the Adam of Beriah” and all of Atzilus “the Adam of Asiyah” relative to the Infinite Light itself; and to the discourse on “But Havayah your G‑d would not listen to Bilam,” which speaks of the hidden love in every Jew as coming from the tip of the yud, the point above Chochmah.
The paragraph completes the reconciliation of the Rambam and the Maharal: in Atzilus G‑d is one with Chochmah, yet Chochmah remains a vessel. A long parenthesis explains how the soul, drawn from Chochmah, still carries G‑d’s own light, and adds that its highest level, the Yechidah, is rooted above Chochmah altogether.
The analogy of the drop is from Tanya’s Kuntres Acharon, in the essay on Pri Etz Chaim: an ordinary thought carries only a radiance of the intellect, which is itself only a garment of the soul, while the drop draws from the essence of the soul as it is clothed in the brain, and so it begets a being like itself. The Likkutei Torah passage on “their goings-forth according to their journeys” calls Adam Kadmon “the Adam of Beriah,” Atik and Arich “the Adam of Yetzirah,” and Atzilus as a whole “the Adam of Asiyah,” relative to the Infinite Light itself; this shows how far above Atzilus Adam Kadmon stands.
Marei mekomos
- 1דאיהו וחיוהי וגרמוהי חד בהון · Tikkunei Zohar 3b:9–10
- 2
- 3שבתניא נתבאר · פ״ב.
- 4כמו שהבן נמשך ממוח האב · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 2:2
- 5וכמ״ש באגה״ק · בקו״א ד״ה להבין מ״ש בפע״ח [קנז, א]. [כ]. וראה בליקוט פי׳ שם.
- 6בהטפה נמשך בה גם ממהות הנפש ועצמותה המלובשת במוחין ולכן מולידה בדומה לה ממש · Tanya, Part V; Kuntres Acharon 4:31
- 7
- 8על פסוק אלה מסעי · לקו״ת מסעי צה, א.
- 9אלה מסעי · Numbers 33:1
- 10מוצאיהם למסעיהם · Numbers 33:2
- 11ועמ״ש במ״א ע״פ ולא אבה · לקו״ת כי תצא לח, ג. אוה״ת כי תצא ע׳ תתקפב ואילך.
- 12ולא אבה הוי׳ אלקיך לשמוע אל בלעם · Deuteronomy 23:6
Self-sacrifice and Torah study ¶5–8
5ב והנה לפיכך בחי׳ ומדרגת מס״נ [מסירות נפש] שהוא ענין הביטול במציאות ממש לא״ס ב״ה נמשך דוקא מצד עצמיות הנפש שלמעלה מהשכל שבטלה לעצמיות א״ס ב״ה שלמעלה מעלה גם כן מהחכמה1 כביטול הנר באבוקה.
2. Now, therefore, the level and rank of self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh), which is the matter of the nullification (bittul) of one’s very existence to the Infinite One, blessed be He, comes specifically from the very being of the soul, which is above intellect, and which is nullified to the very being of the Infinite One, blessed be He, who is also far, far above Chochmah, like the nullification of a candle in a torch.
Section 2 draws the practical consequence. Self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh), the complete setting aside of one’s existence before G‑d, comes only from the essence of the soul, which is above intellect and bows to G‑d’s essence, which is above Chochmah, as a candle’s flame is lost in a torch.
אבל לא די בבחי׳ השכל שבנפש לבד מאחר שאינו רק כלי וגם מקור החכמה הוא כלי בלבד לאלקות. וזהו בכל נפשך2 ממש ולא בחינת לבושים לבד מודומ״ע [מחשבה דבור ומעשה],
But the level of the intellect in the soul alone does not suffice, since it is only a vessel; and even the source of Chochmah is only a vessel for G‑dliness. And this is “with all your soul” in the literal sense, and not only the level of [its] garments: thought, speech and action.
Intellect alone cannot produce this, since it is only a vessel, and even the source of Chochmah is only a vessel for G‑dliness. So “with all your soul” (Deuteronomy 6:5) means the soul itself, not merely its garments of thought, speech and action.
(ובזה מתורץ למה לא נמצא בתורה טעם על מס״נ [מסירות נפש]3 רק על אהבה כמ״ש לאהבה את ה׳ אלהיך כו׳ כי הוא חייך4 אלא שהוא מפני שהמס״נ [שהמסירות נפש] נמשך מצד הבחי׳ שלמעלה מהשכל א״כ איך שייך לומר ע״ז טעם ושכל).
(This resolves why no reason is found in the Torah for self-sacrifice, only for love, as it is written, “To love Havayah your G‑d,” etc., “for He is your life.” Rather, it is because self-sacrifice comes from the level that is above intellect; if so, how could one speak of a reason and rationale for it?)
This explains why the Torah gives a reason for loving G‑d (“for He is your life,” Deuteronomy 30:20) but none for self-sacrifice: self-sacrifice comes from above intellect, so no reason can be given for it. In Torah Ohr, Megillas Esther, the Alter Rebbe adds that “for He is your life” could not be a reason for self-sacrifice, which means giving up one’s life; it comes from the hidden love above Daas.
According to this, one will also understand the matter of “and the study of Torah is equal to them all,” and also what is written, “And you shall speak of them,” immediately after “with all your might.”
Two questions follow from this. Why is Torah study “equal to all” the mitzvos (Mishnah Peah 1:1)? And why does the Shema say “And you shall speak of them,” Torah study, right after “with all your might”?
דמאדך היינו אה״ר [אהבה רבה] בלי גבול ליכלל וליבטל בא״ס ב״ה ואיך תתיישב צמאון אה״ר [אהבה רבה] זו ע״י ודברת בם כו׳ גם בפי׳ בכל נפשך שהוא מס״נ [מסירות נפש] ממש.
For “your might” is a great love (ahavah rabbah) without limit, to be included and nullified in the Infinite One, blessed be He; so how will the thirst of this great love be quenched through “And you shall speak of them,” etc.? [The same question applies] also to the interpretation of “with all your soul” as actual self-sacrifice.
“With all your might” is a boundless love that longs to be absorbed into G‑d. How can studying Torah satisfy such a thirst? The same question applies to “with all your soul” understood as actual self-sacrifice.
וידוע דיש גם כן עוד פי׳ דבכל נפשך היינו ג׳ לבושי הנפש מחשבה ודיבור ומעשה לקשרם במודומ״ע [במחשבה דבור ומעשה] של הקב״ה ע״י עסק התורה ומצות.
And it is known that there is also another interpretation: that “with all your soul” means the three garments of the soul, thought, speech and action, to bind them with the thought, speech and action of the Holy One, blessed be He, through occupying oneself with Torah and mitzvos.
There is a second, well-known reading: “with all your soul” means the soul’s three garments, thought, speech and action, which a person binds to G‑d’s thought, speech and action through Torah and mitzvos.
ואם כן איך ב׳ פירושים אלו שבתיבות בכל נפשך שייכים זל״ז [זה לזה]. והענין כי התורה היא חכמתו ית׳8 שבאצי׳ שבה מלובש אור א״ס ב״ה ממש,
If so, how are these two interpretations of the words “with all your soul” related to each other? The explanation is that the Torah is His wisdom, may He be blessed, in Atzilus, in which the very Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, is enclothed.
How are the two readings, self-sacrifice and binding the garments, connected? The answer begins with the Torah itself: it is G‑d’s wisdom in Atzilus, and the Infinite Light itself is clothed in it.
(ולכן נקרא התורה משל הקדמוני910 שהיא בחי׳ ח״ע [חכמה עילאה] שהוא כלי לאור א״ס ב״ה שהוא קדמונו של עולם כמ״ש מזה בדרוש פורים)11
(Therefore the Torah is called “the parable of the Ancient One”: it is the level of supernal Chochmah, which is a vessel for the Infinite Light, blessed be He, who is “the Ancient One of the world,” as is written about this in the discourse for Purim.)
This is why the Torah is called “the parable of the Ancient One” (I Samuel 24:14): it is supernal Chochmah, the vessel for the Infinite Light, “the Ancient One of the world.” In Torah Ohr’s discourse for Purim the Alter Rebbe explains that “the Ancient One” is the Infinite Light itself, beyond the light that fills and the light that encompasses the worlds, which are only a radiance related to the worlds.
וחכמה דאצילות נתלבשה בחכמה דבי״ע כדי להתלבש בהלכות הערוכות לפנינו שהם מדברים בענינים גשמיים דעשייה פיאה תרומות ומעשרות כו׳ יציאות השבת כו׳.
And Chochmah of Atzilus was enclothed in Chochmah of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, in order to be enclothed in the laws set out before us, which speak of physical matters of Asiyah: the corner of the field, the heave-offerings and the tithes, etc., the carrying out [from domain to domain] on Shabbos, etc.
That supernal wisdom descended through the wisdom of the lower worlds until it was clothed in practical laws about physical things, such as the corner of the field, priestly gifts and tithes, and carrying on Shabbos.
וכשהאדם לומד התורה ומבין ומשיג איזו הלכה לאשורה הרי חכמתו מתקשרת בחכמתו ית׳ שבהלכה זו. והיו לאחדים מכל צד ופנה12 כמ״ש בס׳ של בינוני׳ ח״א [חלק א׳] פ״ה.
And when a person studies Torah and understands and grasps some law properly, his wisdom is bound up with His wisdom, may He be blessed, that is in this law, “and they become one, from every side and angle,” as is written in Sefer shel Beinonim, Part I, chapter 5.
When a person truly understands a law of the Torah, his mind becomes one with G‑d’s wisdom in that law. Tanya, chapter 5, calls this a wondrous union, “from every side and angle.”
The paragraph shows that self-sacrifice comes from the soul’s essence above intellect, and then asks how Torah study, an act of intellect, can satisfy that boundless love. It begins the answer: the Torah is G‑d’s own wisdom, in which the Infinite Light is clothed, brought down into practical laws, so that understanding a law unites the mind with G‑d’s wisdom.
The Torah Ohr discourse for Purim, to which the text refers, explains “the Ancient One” as the Infinite Light itself, beyond the levels of filling and encompassing the worlds, which are only a radiance related to the worlds. The parallel Torah Ohr passage on self-sacrifice adds that “for He is your life” cannot be its reason, since self-sacrifice means giving up one’s life; it comes from the hidden love above Daas.
Marei mekomos
- 1שלמעלה מעלה גם כן מהחכמה · נתבאר באוה״ת ויקרא-ב ע׳ תקצו.
- 2בכל נפשך · Deuteronomy 6:5
- 3טעם על מס״נ · ראה תו״א צט, ב. הערת כ״ק אדמו״ר בסה״מ ה׳תש״ט ע׳ 121.
- 4לאהבה את ה״א . . כי הוא חייך · Deuteronomy 30:20
- 5ות״ת כנגד כולם · פאה א, א.
- 6ותלמוד תורה כנגד כולם · Mishnah Peah 1:1
- 7ודברת בם · Deuteronomy 6:7
- 8והענין כי התורה היא חכמתו ית׳ · מכאן עד להלן ו, רע״א נמצא ג״כ בשינויים אחדים בהמשך מים רבים תרל״ו פרקים קפו-קפט. וראה שם ח״ב ס״ע תקיג ואילך.
- 9נקרא התורה משל הקדמוני · ראה אוה״ת וארא ע׳ קנב.
- 10משל הקדמוני · I Samuel 24:14
- 11כמ״ש מזה בדרוש פורים · תו״א צח, ב. ראה בלקו״ש ח״ז ע׳ 26 ואילך למה נזכר כאן בלשון בדרוש פורים. ע״ש בארוכה.
- 12והיו לאחדים מכל צד ופנה · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 5:6–7
6והנה מבואר למעלה1 שעם היות הנשמה עצמה היא למעלה מהשכל מכל מקום עכ״פ [על כל פנים] השכל הוא כלי לעצמות הנשמה.
Now, it was explained above that although the soul itself is above intellect, nevertheless, at any rate, the intellect is a vessel for the very being of the soul.
A recap of what was shown above: the soul is above intellect, yet intellect is a vessel for the soul’s essence, which is clothed in it.
וכן למעלה אע״פ [אף על פי] שאור א״ס ב״ה הוא למעלה מגדר ובחי׳ חכמה אפילו מבחי׳ ח״ע [חכמה עילאה] דאצילות מ״מ מלובש הוא בח״ע [בחכמה עילאה]
So too above: although the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, is above the definition and level of Chochmah, even the level of supernal Chochmah of Atzilus, nevertheless it is enclothed in supernal Chochmah,
The same holds above: the Infinite Light is beyond Chochmah, even the Chochmah of Atzilus, yet it is clothed in supernal Chochmah.
שהחכמה היא דוקא כלי לאור א״ס ב״ה כמ״ש הטעם בס׳ של בינונים פל״ה בהג״ה [בהגהה]
for Chochmah is specifically a vessel for the Infinite Light, blessed be He, as the reason is given in Sefer shel Beinonim, chapter 35, in the gloss.
For Chochmah is the one vessel in which the Infinite Light rests, as the gloss in Tanya, chapter 35, explains.
וכיון שכן הרי על ידי התקשרות ויחוד חכמה ושכל של הנשמה בחכמה שבתורה שהיא חכמתו ית׳ עי״ז ממילא נעשה ג״כ התכללות ויחוד עצמיות הנשמה שלמעלה מהשכל באור א״ס ב״ה ממש שלמעלה מעלה מבחי׳ ח״ע [חכמה עילאה] כיון דאור א״ס ב״ה מלובש בח״ע [בחכמה עילאה] אשר היא הלכה זו.
Since this is so, through the binding and union of the wisdom and intellect of the soul with the wisdom that is in the Torah, which is His wisdom, may He be blessed, through this there comes about of itself the inclusion and union, too, of the very being of the soul, which is above intellect, in the very Infinite Light, blessed be He, which is far, far above the level of supernal Chochmah; since the Infinite Light, blessed be He, is enclothed in supernal Chochmah, which is this law.
Since this is so, when a person unites his mind with a law of the Torah, which is G‑d’s wisdom, he thereby unites the very essence of his soul, which is above intellect, with the very Infinite Light, which is far above Chochmah, because that light is clothed in the Chochmah that is this law.
Since the soul is clothed in its intellect and G‑d is clothed in the wisdom of the Torah, the union of the two intellects carries with it the union of the soul’s essence with the essence of the Infinite Light.
The gloss in Tanya, chapter 35, gives the reason Chochmah is the vessel for the Infinite Light: the Infinite One is the true One, alone with nothing besides Him, and that is the level of Chochmah, as the Alter Rebbe heard from his teacher.
Marei mekomos
- 1והנה מבואר למעלה · במים רבים תרל״ו שם: והנה נת״ל בפ׳ קפ״ה (ושם בפקפ״ה נמצא לשון הלקו״ת במדבר טז, סע״ב בשינויים אחדים).
7וגם נשמת האדם שלמעלה מהשכל שלו מלובשת בכח השכל שהרי הנפש נק׳ נפש המשכלת.
The human soul too, which is above his intellect, is enclothed in the power of intellect, for the soul is called “the intellectual soul.”
The human soul too is clothed in its power of intellect; that is why it is called “the intellectual soul.”
א״כ בהתקשרות ויחוד שכל האדם בחכמת התורה. נעשה גם כן יחוד עליון יותר מזה והוא התכללות עצמיות הנשמה בעצמיות אור א״ס ב״ה.1
If so, in the binding and union of a person’s intellect with the wisdom of the Torah, there also comes about a union higher than this, namely the inclusion of the very being of the soul in the very being of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He.
So when a person’s intellect unites with the wisdom of the Torah, a higher union also takes place: the very essence of the soul is absorbed into the very essence of the Infinite Light. Through Torah study, then, a person reaches the same level as self-sacrifice. The Kehot note cites Likkutei Sichos (vol. 15, p. 3, note 28): this comes about when the study is preceded by the Shema and prayer with readiness to give one’s soul at “One,” as the maamar itself says below.
Torah study unites not only intellect with intellect but the essence of the soul with the essence of G‑d, which is why it can answer the boundless love of “with all your might.”
Later in this maamar (Likkutei Torah, Vayikra 5a) the Alter Rebbe says so himself: one who says “I have only Torah” does not have even Torah, because the inclusion of the soul in the Infinite Light through study depends on the heart’s true desire for this self-nullification, reached by first reading the Shema and praying.
Marei mekomos
- 1התכללות ויחוד עצמות הנשמה בעצמות אור א״ס · ראה לקו״ש-טו ע׳ 3 הערה 28 שמבאר שזהו ע״י הקדמת ק״ש ותפלה למס״נ באחד שאז כשעוסק בתורה כו׳ נעשה ג״כ יחוד והתכללות עצמיות הנפש כו׳ (ראה לקמן ה, א).
8וכ״ז [וכל זה] נעשה דוקא על ידי התקשרות השכל בחכמת התורה וזהו שאיתא דאורייתא היא היכלא עילאה דקוב״ה [דקודשא בריך הוא].1
And all this comes about specifically through the binding of the intellect with the wisdom of the Torah. This is what is stated, that the Torah is the supernal chamber of the Holy One, blessed be He.
This union of the soul’s essence with G‑d comes only through binding the intellect to the Torah’s wisdom. That is why the Zohar calls the Torah “the supernal chamber” of the Holy One: the place where He Himself dwells.
ואע״פ [ואף על פי] שהאדם אינו מרגיש כלל התכללות זו בשעת עסקו בתורה ועיקר עסקו וטרדתו הוא בהחכמה להשיגה
And although a person does not feel this inclusion at all while he is occupied with Torah, and his main occupation and preoccupation is with the wisdom, to grasp it;
An objection: a person studying Torah feels nothing of this union. He is busy trying to understand the material, and that effort fills his mind.
ולא עוד אלא שאפשר שיתערב מקצת ישות באמצע אם השכיל בטוב כו׳
and not only that, but it is possible that some measure of self-importance (yeshus) will mix in along the way, if he has understood well, etc.;
Worse, if he understands well he may feel a little pride.
מ״מ מאחר שעיקר כוונתו לשמה ובתורת ה׳ דוקא חפצו2 לכן עצמיות נשמתו נכללת בא״ס ב״ה ואע״ג [ואף על גב] דאיהו לא חזי3 מזליה חזי. (ועמ״ש מכל זה בד״ה וידבר אלקים גבי חג השבועות4 ע״ש).
nevertheless, since his main intention is for its own sake, and “his desire is” specifically “in the Torah of Havayah,” therefore the very being of his soul is included in the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He; and even though he does not see, his mazal sees. (And see what is written about all this in the discourse beginning “And G‑d spoke,” for the festival of Shavuos; see there.)
Yet since his main intention is to study for its own sake, and his “desire is in the Torah of Havayah” (Psalms 1:2), the essence of his soul is absorbed into G‑d all the same. The Talmud says of the men with Daniel, who did not see his vision yet were seized with fear, “Though they did not see, their mazal saw”: the root of the soul above perceives what the person below does not. In the Shavuos discourse “And G‑d spoke” (Likkutei Torah, Bamidbar), the Alter Rebbe explains that Torah study below arouses the soul’s root above, its mazal, to receive the light of the Infinite One that rests in the Torah’s wisdom.
ובזה יובן איך שני הפי׳ דבכל נפשך מישך שייכי אהדדי וגם דשייך ודברת בם תיכף לובכל מאדך.
With this one will understand how the two interpretations of “with all your soul” are bound up with each other, and also that “And you shall speak of them” belongs immediately after “and with all your might.”
Now the two questions are answered. The two readings of “with all your soul,” self-sacrifice and binding the soul’s garments through Torah, belong together, and so does “And you shall speak of them” after “with all your might.”
כי המס״נ [המסירות נפש] ליבטל ולהכלל בא״ס ב״ה ובעסקו בתורה גם כן מתכללת נשמתו בא״ס ב״ה כו׳
For self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh) is to be nullified and included in the Infinite One, blessed be He; and in his occupation with Torah, too, his soul is included in the Infinite One, blessed be He, etc.
Self-sacrifice means being nullified and absorbed into G‑d, and Torah study achieves the same absorption of the soul into G‑d.
לכן ענין ודברת בם הוא המרוה צמאון האה״ר [האהבה רבה] דבכל מאדך ליבטל וליכלל בא״ס ב״ה (ועמ״ש מענין עסק התורה בד״ה כי ביום הזה יכפר56 בפי׳ והיו הדברים האלה7 כו׳ ודברת בם ע״ש):
Therefore “And you shall speak of them” is what quenches the thirst of the great love (ahavah rabbah) of “with all your might,” to be nullified and included in the Infinite One, blessed be He. (And see what is written on the matter of occupation with Torah in the discourse beginning “For on this day He shall atone,” in the explanation of “And these words shall be,” etc., “and you shall speak of them”; see there.)
So Torah study is what satisfies the boundless love of “with all your might,” the thirst to be absorbed into G‑d. The text refers to its discourse on “For on this day He shall atone” (Likkutei Torah, Acharei), which asks how “these words” of the Shema, said only morning and evening, lead to “you shall speak of them” at all times, in words of Torah.
The paragraph answers the questions raised earlier: because Torah study unites the soul’s essence with G‑d, even when the learner does not feel it, it fulfils the same longing as self-sacrifice, and so it rightly follows “with all your might.”
The Shavuos discourse “And G‑d spoke” in Likkutei Torah (Bamidbar) explains that a power of intellect, even after it extends from the soul as a distinct faculty, remains one with the soul, so that the soul is named after it, “the intellectual soul”; in the same way the life-force drawn from the Infinite Light into the worlds remains one with its source.
Marei mekomos
- 1דאורייתא היא היכלא עילאה דקוב״ה · Zohar II, 200a
- 2ובתורת ה׳ דוקא חפצו · Psalms 1:2
- 3ואע״ג דאיהו לא חזי · Megillah 3a:14
- 4בד״ה וידבר . . גבי חג השבועות · לקו״ת במדבר טז, א. סה״מ תקס״ח ע׳ קג.
- 5בד״ה כי ביום הזה יכפר · לקו״ת אחרי כז, א.
- 6
- 7והיו הדברים האלה · Deuteronomy 6:6
Torah study in self-nullification ¶9–16
9ג וזהו הטעם לעוצם השקידה בתלמוד תורה של חכמי המשנה והגמרא אשר זה היה עבודתם כל הימים לא פסק פומי׳ [פומיה] מגירסא. ומהדר תלמודי׳ [תלמודיה] מתלתין יומין1 לתלתין יומין וגם רשב״י [רבי שמעון בר יוחאי] כנז׳ [כנזכר] בשבת פ׳ במה מדליקין.234
3. And this is the reason for the immense diligence in Torah study of the sages of the Mishnah and the Gemara, for whom this was their service all their days: “his mouth did not cease from study,” and “he would review his learning every thirty days”; and also Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, as is mentioned in [tractate] Shabbos, the chapter Bameh Madlikin.
Section 3 draws a conclusion: this is why the sages of the Mishnah and Talmud studied with such intensity, never pausing and reviewing all their learning every thirty days (as the Talmud says of Rav Sheshes), and why Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, as the Talmud recounts in the second chapter of Shabbos, devoted himself entirely to Torah.
The sages’ ceaseless devotion to study is explained by what was just shown: Torah study unites the soul’s essence with G‑d.
The parallel in Mayim Rabbim adds the Talmud’s account in Shabbos (33b): at first, when Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai raised a difficulty, Rabbi Pinchas ben Yair would answer it twelve ways, and in the end, when Rabbi Pinchas raised one, Rabbi Shimon would answer it twenty-four ways. It also refers to “their Torah is their occupation” (Shabbos 11a), and to Rabbeinu Yonah, who counts Rabbi Shimon among those who reviewed every thirty days.
Marei mekomos
- 1ומהדר תלמודי׳ מתלתין יומין · Pesachim 68b:13
- 2רשב״י . . במה מדליקין · במים רבים שם: רשב״י מעיקרא כי הוה מקשי רשב״י קושי׳ הוה מפרק לי׳ רפב״י י״ב פירוקי ולבסוף כי הוה מקשי רפב״י קושי׳ הוה מפרק לי׳ רשב״י כ״ד [כ״ה בגוכי״ק. ובהנדפס שם: כ״ה] פרוקי כנז׳ בשבת פרק במה מדליקין דל״ג ע״ב. וע׳ (יא, א) תורתן אומנתן. ורבינו יונה ריש מס׳ ברכות קחשיב גם רשב״י שהי׳ מתלתין יומין לתלתין יומין ול״מ. [כנראה כוונתו לברכות ח, א ד״ה אלא ושם רשב״י לא הי׳ מתפלל אלא משנה לשנה]. [כ].
- 3
- 4
10וגם בזוהר נז׳ [נזכר] מארי מתניתא ומארי קבלה מועטים1 היו ומהו הלימוד סדר זרעים בצמח הארץ וסדר טהרות אבות הטומאה כו׳
And in the Zohar too the “masters of the Mishnah” are mentioned, and the masters of the Kabbalah were few. And what is [their] study? The Order of Zeraim, on what grows from the earth, and the Order of Taharos, the primary sources of impurity, etc.
The Zohar too speaks of “the masters of the Mishnah,” while the masters of Kabbalah were few. And what did the masters of the Mishnah study? Laws of agriculture (the Order of Zeraim) and of ritual purity (the Order of Taharos).
שהם הכל מדברים בענינים גשמיים אלא לפי שבהם נתלבשה חכמתו ית׳ ע״י התלבשות בחכמה דבריאה כו׳ כנ״ל
All of these speak of physical matters; but [they were studied] because His wisdom, may He be blessed, was enclothed in them, through being enclothed in the Chochmah of Beriah, etc., as mentioned above;
All these deal with physical matters. They studied them because G‑d’s wisdom is clothed in them, having descended through the wisdom of the lower worlds, as explained above.
ובתוכה שורה אור א״ס ב״ה, וזהו עיקר התכלית להמשיך גילוי אור א״ס ב״ה שלמעלה מהאצי׳.
and within it rests the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He. And this is the main purpose: to draw down the revelation of the Infinite Light, blessed be He, that is above Atzilus.
Within that wisdom rests the Infinite Light itself. The very purpose of the study is to draw down the revelation of the Infinite Light that is above Atzilus.
The study of practical, physical laws was the sages’ main work because G‑d’s wisdom, and within it the Infinite Light, is clothed in them.
Marei mekomos
- 1מארי קבלה . . מועטים היו · במים רבים שם: מועטים המה.
11וגם המלאכים בקשו1 התורה בשביל זה ולא ניתנה להם אלא לישראל דוקא להמשיך גילוי אור הסוכ״ע בעה״ז [בעולם הזה] דוקא
The angels, too, asked for the Torah for this reason, yet it was not given to them, but specifically to Israel, to draw down the revelation of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) specifically into this world.
The angels asked for the Torah for this very reason (Shabbos 88b), yet it was given only to Israel, so that the encompassing light, too great to enter the worlds, would be revealed in this lowest world.
ולכן נתלבשה התורה בענינים גשמיים דוקא.2 בכדי שאח״כ בתחה״מ [בתחיית המתים] שהוא תכלית הבריאה יהי׳ [יהיה] גילוי זה לנשמות שבגופים דוקא.
Therefore the Torah was enclothed specifically in physical matters, so that afterwards, at the Resurrection of the Dead, which is the purpose of creation, this revelation will come to souls in bodies specifically.
That is why the Torah is clothed in physical matters: so that at the Resurrection of the Dead, the goal of creation, this revelation will come to souls in bodies.
The Torah was given to souls in bodies, and clothed in physical laws, so that the highest light would be revealed in this world, culminating at the Resurrection.
Marei mekomos
- 1וגם המלאכים בקשו תורה · Shabbat 88b:7
- 2בענינים גשמיים דוקא · ראה המשך תער״ב ח״ב ס״ע שסג.
And this is through the nullification (bittul) of the soul and its inclusion in the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, now, through occupation with Torah, as mentioned above:
That revelation is earned now, through the soul’s self-nullification in Torah study.
שלא להיות בבחי׳ יש בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] אלא להיות בטל לאור א״ס ורצונו וחכמתו שזהו עסק התורה וכמ״ש ולא תחללו2 שלא לעשות בחי׳ חלל והעלם אור א״ס ב״ה.
not to be in the state of a “something” (yesh) by itself, but to be nullified to the Infinite Light and to His will and wisdom, which is occupation with Torah. And as it is written, “And you shall not profane (techalelu)”: not to make a void (chalal) and a concealment of the Infinite Light, blessed be He.
Not feeling oneself a separate, independent “something” (yesh), but being nullified to G‑d’s light, will and wisdom, which is what Torah study is. The Alter Rebbe reads “And you shall not profane” (velo techalelu) as “do not make a void” (chalal), a place from which G‑d’s light is hidden. At the end of the discourse “And I shall be sanctified” (Likkutei Torah, Emor) he reads the verse the same way: first one must turn from evil entirely, so as not to make a void that separates a person from his Father in heaven.
שהוא ית׳ אינו שורה במי שהוא יש ודבר שאין אני והוא יכולים לדור3 בעולם א״כ גורם בחי׳ חלל שמסתלק אור א״ס ב״ה ממנו כו׳.
For He, may He be blessed, does not rest upon one who is a “something” and an entity, for “I and he cannot dwell in the world [together]”; if so, he causes [a state of] void, in that the Infinite Light, blessed be He, withdraws from him, etc.
G‑d does not rest on one who feels himself a separate entity; the Talmud says of the arrogant, “I and he cannot dwell in the world together.” Such a person creates a “void,” from which the Infinite Light withdraws.
The paragraph defines the inner condition of Torah study: self-nullification, the opposite of making oneself a separate “something” that drives G‑d’s light away.
Marei mekomos
- 1עסק התורה כנ״ל · בהמשך מים רבים שם: כנ״ל פקפ״ו. ע״ש.
- 2ולא תחללו · Leviticus 22:32
- 3שאין אני והוא יכולים לדור · Sotah 5a:14–15
13והנה ידוע שלהיות התהוות העולמות נעשה חלל ומקום פנוי1 ואח״כ נמשך קו לתוך מקום החלל, וענין החלל הוא העלם האור והקו היא בחי׳ הגלוי.
Now, it is known that for the worlds to come into being, a void (chalal) and an empty space were made, and afterwards a kav (line of light) was drawn into the place of the void. The void is the concealment of the light, and the kav is the level of revelation.
Background from the Arizal’s teaching on creation: to make room for the worlds, G‑d’s light was withdrawn, leaving a “void” or empty space, and then a thin “line” (kav) of light was drawn into it. The void is the hiding of the light; the kav is its revelation. Below, in the supplements to Likkutei Torah on Vayikra (51b), the Alter Rebbe quotes a gloss that the void is not truly empty: an impression (reshimu) of the light remains there, and it is called a void only relative to the Infinite One.
אך כיון שהגילוי מעט רק עד״מ בבחי׳ קו וחוט לבד ע״כ2 ברבוי ההשתלשלות העולמות נעשה למטה בחי׳ העלם והסתר, וגם כי הארת הקו מסתיים במלכות דאצי׳ אלא שאח״כ נמשך ובוקע דרך הפרסא.
But since the revelation is small, only, by way of analogy, in the form of a line and a thread alone, therefore, through the many stages of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus), concealment and hiding come about below; and also because the radiance of the kav ends at Malchus of Atzilus, except that afterwards it is drawn on and breaks through the partition (parsa).
Because that revelation is only a thin line, it is progressively concealed as it descends through the many worlds. Its radiance ends at Malchus of Atzilus, and only afterwards breaks through the “partition” (parsa) that separates Atzilus from the lower worlds.
אמנם לע״ל [לעתיד לבוא] יהי׳ [יהיה] גילוי אור א״ס שלמעלה מהצמצום וחלל ולא יהי׳ [יהיה] עוד הגילוי בבחי׳ קו אלא עצמות אור א״ס יתגלה ולא יהיה עוד חלל והפסק כלל.
In the Time to Come, however, there will be a revelation of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) that is above the tzimtzum and the void. The revelation will no longer be in the form of a kav; rather, the very essence of the Infinite Light will be revealed, and there will no longer be any void or interruption at all.
In the Time to Come, the Infinite Light from before the tzimtzum will be revealed: not a thin line but the essence of the light itself, with no void and no interruption.
The paragraph contrasts the present revelation of G‑d’s light, a thin line into a void that grows fainter below, with the future revelation of the essence of the light, beyond the tzimtzum.
The Likkutei Torah passage that the Kehot note points to quotes a gloss: the “void” is not literally empty, for an impression (reshimu) of the light remains there; it is called a void only relative to the Infinite One.
Marei mekomos
- 1נעשה חלל ומקום פנוי · ראה לקמן נא, ב ואילך.
- 2כיון — ע״כ · במים רבים שם (ע׳ ריא): א״כ. אבל הוא טה״ד שם ובגוכי״ק דמים רבים הוא כהנדפס כאן.
14והגילוי יהיה למטה דוקא. משא״כ עכשיו שהקו מסתיים באצי׳ כו׳ והא בהא תליא שכשהגילוי רק בבחי׳ קו ע״כ הולך ומתמעט וכמשל החבל שבראשו עב והולך ומתקצר כו׳ עד שמסתיים באצי׳
And the revelation will be specifically below; whereas now the kav ends in Atzilus, etc. The one depends on the other: when the revelation is only in the form of a kav, therefore it keeps diminishing, like the analogy of a rope that is thick at its top and keeps tapering, etc., until it ends in Atzilus;
In the future the revelation will reach below, whereas now the kav ends in Atzilus. The two are linked: a revelation that comes as a line keeps diminishing, like a rope that is thick at the top and keeps thinning until it gives out at Atzilus.
משא״כ כשהגילוי הוא עצמיות האור שלא בבחי׳ קו הנה מעלה ומטה שוין,
whereas when the revelation is of the very essence of the light, not in the form of a kav, above and below are equal.
But when the essence of the light itself is revealed, not as a line, above and below are equal.
(וכמ״ש בד״ה זכור את יום השבת1 גבי פי׳ קוינו כו׳ ולעתיד כו׳ ע״ש), וגילוי זה לע״ל [לעתיד לבוא] הוא ע״י עסק התורה עכשיו בבחי׳ ביטול שבחכמת התורה שורה ומלובש אור א״ס אלא שהוא בבחי׳ קו.
(As is written in the discourse beginning “Remember the Shabbos day,” regarding the explanation of “We have hoped (kivinu),” etc., and “in the Time to Come,” etc.; see there.) And this revelation in the Time to Come comes through occupation with Torah now in a state of self-nullification (bittul); for in the wisdom of the Torah the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) rests and is enclothed, except that it is in the form of a kav.
The parenthesis points to the Shabbos discourse in Torah Ohr, which links “kivinu” (“we have hoped”) to the kav and says that in the future, as on Shabbos, above and below will be equal. That future revelation is brought about by Torah study now, in self-nullification, since the Infinite Light is clothed in the Torah’s wisdom, though only as a kav.
וע״י הביטול של הנפש האדם שעצמיות הנפש נכללת בבחי׳ ביטול בהקו אור א״ס שבתורה גורם וממשיך התגלות עצמיות האור שלמעלה מהקו והחלל כו׳,
And through the nullification of a person’s soul, in that the very being of the soul is included, in a state of nullification, in the kav of the Infinite Light that is in the Torah, he causes and draws down the revelation of the very essence of the light that is above the kav and the void, etc.
When a person’s soul is nullified and its essence absorbed into the kav of light that is in the Torah, he draws down the essence of the light that is above the kav and the void.
(כי ביטול היש מעורר מאד למעלה לכן ביטול זה של הנפש והחב״ד [והחכמה בינה ודעת] שלה ולבושיה מו״ד [מחשבה ודבור] בעסק התורה בבחי׳ ולא תחללו גורם להמשיך תוספת אור בהתורה.
(For the nullification of the “something” (yesh) brings about a great arousal above. Therefore this nullification of the soul, and of its Chochmah, Binah and Daas and its garments of thought and speech, in occupation with Torah in the manner of “And you shall not profane,” causes additional light to be drawn into the Torah.
The reason, in parentheses: self-nullification below arouses a great response above. When the soul, its intellect and its garments of thought and speech are nullified in Torah study (“do not make a void”), more light is drawn into the Torah.
וזהו פי׳ עוסק בתורה לשמה ר״ל [רוצה לומר] לשם התורה עצמה.2 שהרי עכשיו מלובש בה רק קו מאור א״ס וע״י עסק האדם בתורה לשמה גורם התגלות אור א״ס שלמעלה מהקו כו׳, ועמ״ש סד״ה ויקח קרח).3
And this is the meaning of “one who occupies himself with Torah for its own sake (lishmah)”: that is, for the sake of the Torah itself. For now only a kav of the Infinite Light is enclothed in it, and through a person’s occupation with Torah for its own sake he causes the revelation of the Infinite Light that is above the kav, etc. And see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “And Korach took.”)
This is what “Torah study for its own sake” (lishmah) means: for the sake of the Torah itself, to bring into it the light above the kav that now shines in it only as a line. The parenthesis refers to the end of the discourse “And Korach took” (Likkutei Torah, Korach), where the Alter Rebbe explains that Torah alone is not enough: awe and love must also be drawn down from above, through the mitzvos.
ומ״מ ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] כל האומר אין לי אלא תורה אפילו תורה אין לו,4 כי בכדי שיהיה נעשה התכללות הנפש באור א״ס ב״ה בעסק התורה ברעותא דלבא תליא מלתא שיחפוץ באמת בביטול זה.
Nevertheless, our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Whoever says, ‘I have nothing but Torah,’ does not have even Torah.” For in order for the inclusion of the soul in the Infinite Light, blessed be He, to come about through occupation with Torah, “the matter depends on the desire of the heart”: that he truly desire this nullification.
Yet Torah study alone is not enough: the Talmud says that whoever says “I have nothing but Torah” does not have even Torah. The soul’s absorption into G‑d through study depends on the heart’s true desire for this self-nullification. In Likkutei Torah, Va’eschanan, the Alter Rebbe cites the same saying: even the drawing-down that comes through the Torah needs prayer from the depth of the heart first.
The paragraph shows that Torah study in self-nullification draws down, now and in the future, the essence of the light beyond the kav; but it depends on a heart that truly wants to be nullified to G‑d.
Tanya, chapter 5, explains why Torah is the place of this union: a law of the Torah is G‑d’s own will and wisdom, so when the mind grasps a law and is clothed in it, it grasps and is clothed in G‑d’s will. The discourse on Korach adds that Torah alone is not enough; awe and love must be drawn down from above, through the mitzvos.
Marei mekomos
- 1בד״ה זכור את יום השבת · תו״א ע, ד: ולעתיד יהי׳ בחי׳ שבת מעלה ומטה שוין עכ״ל.
- 2ר״ל לשם התורה עצמה · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 5
- 3סד״ה ויקח קרח · לקו״ת קרח נה, א.
- 4כל האומר . . תורה אין לו · Yevamot 109b:4–5
15והיינו ע״י קדימת ק״ש [קריאת שמע] ותפלה וכמ״ש האריז״ל [האר״י זכרונו לברכה] למס״נ [למסירות נפש] באחד.1
And this is through preceding [Torah study] with the Shema and prayer, and as the Arizal, of blessed memory, wrote: to give over one’s soul (mesirus nefesh) in [the word] “One.”
That desire is created by reciting the Shema and praying before studying, with the Arizal’s intention of giving one’s soul to G‑d at the word “One” (Echad); the Kehot note gives its source in Pri Etz Chaim, the Gate of the Reading of the Shema, chapter 12.
דלכאורה הרי מס״נ [מסירות נפש] הוא באומרו ובכל נפשך. אלא כי ענין מס״נ [מסירות נפש] באחד היינו הביטול עצמיות נפש האלקית שלמעלה מהשכל כו׳. וענין מס״נ [מסירות נפש] דובכל נפשך היינו שגם נפש הבהמית תסכים לזה בבחי׳ אתכפייא ואתהפכא
For seemingly, self-sacrifice is when one says “and with all your soul.” But the matter of self-sacrifice in “One” is the nullification of the very being of the G‑dly soul, which is above intellect, etc.; and the matter of self-sacrifice of “and with all your soul” is that the animal soul, too, should agree to this, in the manner of subjugation and transformation (iskafya and is’hapcha),
But one might think self-sacrifice belongs to the next verse, “and with all your soul.” The answer distinguishes two levels. Self-sacrifice at “One” is the nullification of the G‑dly soul’s essence, above intellect; self-sacrifice at “with all your soul” is that even the animal soul agrees, first by being subdued (iskafya) and then by being transformed (is’hapcha).
והיינו ע״י ההתבוננות כו׳, ולזאת אח״כ כשעוסק בתורה ומתקשר שכלו בחכמתו ית׳ שבתורה. נעשה ג״כ יחוד והתכללות עצמיות הנפש באור א״ס ב״ה ממש המלובש בח״ע [בחכמה עילאה].
and this is through contemplation, etc. Therefore, afterwards, when he occupies himself with Torah and his intellect is bound with His wisdom, may He be blessed, that is in the Torah, there also comes about a union and inclusion of the very being of the soul in the very Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, that is enclothed in supernal Chochmah.
The animal soul is brought to this through contemplation of G‑d’s greatness. Having prepared in this way, when a person then studies Torah and binds his mind to G‑d’s wisdom in it, the essence of his soul is united with the Infinite Light clothed in supernal Chochmah.
Prayer and the Shema, with self-sacrifice at “One” and the animal soul’s consent at “with all your soul,” create the heart’s desire that lets later Torah study unite the soul’s essence with G‑d.
The Kehot note also points to the Bach on Orach Chaim, at the beginning of section 61, and to the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah, Terumah.
Marei mekomos
- 1וכמ״ש האריז״ל למס״נ באחד · ראה פע״ח שער הק״ש פי״ב. ב״ח או״ח ר״ס סא. אוה״ת תרומה ס״ע א׳שסז.
The verse “If he sets his heart toward Him” (Job 34:14) supports the point that everything depends on the heart’s desire. In its plain sense Elihu says that if G‑d were to set His heart upon a man, He would gather the man’s spirit and soul to Himself; the maamar reads it of a person who sets his heart toward G‑d, so that his spirit and soul are gathered to Him.
והגם שבדברי רז״ל [רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] נז׳ [נזכר] הלשון כל האומר אין לי אלא תורה2 אפילו תורה אין לו אלא תורה וגמילות חסדים. הנה ודאי דגמילות חסדים הוא כפשוטו ממש כי תכלית חכמה תשובה ומעשים טובים והלומד ואינו עושה3 נוח לו שתהפך שלייתו4 ע״פ.
And although in the words of our Sages, of blessed memory, the wording mentioned is, “Whoever says, ‘I have nothing but Torah,’ does not have even Torah; rather, Torah and acts of kindness,” certainly acts of kindness are [meant] in their actual, literal sense, for “the purpose of wisdom is teshuvah and good deeds,” and “one who learns and does not do, it would be better for him had his afterbirth been turned over on his face.”
But the Sages’ wording is “Whoever says, ‘I have nothing but Torah,’ does not have even Torah; rather, Torah and acts of kindness.” Acts of kindness there are meant literally, since “the purpose of wisdom is teshuvah and good deeds” (Berachos 17a), and the Jerusalem Talmud says that one who learns without doing would have been better off never born, his afterbirth turned over his face.
אמנם באמת גם עיון תפלה5 הוא בכלל גמ״ח [גמילות חסדים] כדאיתא בגמ׳ [בגמרא] ופרש״י [ופירש רש״י / ופירוש רש״י] בשבת דקכ״ז (ועמ״ש בד״ה וכל בניך למודי67 ה׳ בענין בניך ובוניך):8
However, in truth, concentration in prayer (iyun tefillah) is also included in acts of kindness, as is stated in the Gemara and as Rashi explains, in [tractate] Shabbos, folio 127. (And see what is written in the discourse beginning “And all your children shall be taught of Havayah,” concerning “your children” [and] “your builders.”)
Yet the Talmud in Shabbos (127a), as Rashi explains it, counts concentration in prayer among the acts of kindness, so prayer, too, is the needed partner of Torah study. In Likkutei Torah, Re’eh, on “And all your children shall be taught of Havayah,” the Alter Rebbe reads “your children” (banayich) as prayer, with its love and awe, and “your builders” (bonayich) as the Torah study that follows it, and adds that the building is made lasting by charity and kindness.
The paragraph reconciles the Sages’ “Torah and acts of kindness” with the maamar’s claim that Torah study needs prayer before it: concentrated prayer is itself counted among acts of kindness, while kindness in the literal sense remains required too.
The Likkutei Torah discourse on “And all your children” begins from the Sages’ teaching that Torah scholars increase peace in the world, read from “do not read ‘your children’ but ‘your builders,’” and asks why that rereading is needed.
Marei mekomos
- 1אם ישים אליו לבו · Job 34:14
- 2אלא תורה וגמ״ח · ראה הערת כ״ק אדמו״ר בסה״מ תש״ח ע׳ 266.
- 3והלומד ואינו עושה · ירוש׳ פ״א דשבת ה״ב יעו״ש. [כ].
- 4והלומד ואינו עושה נוח לו שתהפך שלייתו · Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat 1:2
- 5עיון תפלה · Shabbat 127a:14
- 6בד״ה וכל בניך למודי ה׳ · לקו״ת ראה כט, א ואילך.
- 7וכל בניך למודי ה׳ · Isaiah 54:13
- 8תכלית חכ׳ תשובה · Berakhot 17a:11
Revealed Torah and Kabbalah ¶17–22
17ד והנה מכ״ז [מכל זה] יובן שמעלה ומדרגה זו שבעסק התורה ששכל האדם העוסק בתורה מתקשר ומתאחד בחכמתו ית׳.
4. Now, from all this it will be understood that this virtue and rank in occupation with Torah, that the intellect of a person who occupies himself with Torah is bound and united with His wisdom, may He be blessed,
Section 4 draws a further conclusion from all that has been said: the special power of Torah study is that the learner’s mind binds itself and becomes one with G‑d’s wisdom.
ועי״ז נכלל עצמיות הנפש באור א״ס ב״ה המלובש בחכמתו ית׳ זהו דייקא בעסק התורה הנגלות לנו שהם שיתא סדרי משנה המדברים מכשר ופסול טמא וטהור וחייב וזכאי כו׳
and through this the very being of the soul is included in the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, that is enclothed in His wisdom, may He be blessed, is specifically in occupation with [the parts of] the Torah that are revealed to us, which are the six orders of the Mishnah, which speak of what is fit and unfit, impure and pure, liable and exempt, etc.
Through that, the essence of the soul is absorbed into the Infinite Light clothed in G‑d’s wisdom. This happens specifically in the revealed Torah, the six orders of the Mishnah, which rule on what is fit or unfit, pure or impure, liable or exempt.
לפי שהם נתלבשו בעשיה ר״ל [רוצה לומר] שחכמתו יתברך שבאצי׳ שבתוכה אור א״ס ב״ה1 נסעה וירדה עד2 שנתלבשה בדברים גשמיים שבעניני עוה״ז
For they have been enclothed in Asiyah; that is to say, His wisdom, may He be blessed, of Atzilus, within which is the Infinite Light, blessed be He, journeyed and descended until it was enclothed in physical things, in the matters of this world,
The reason is that these laws are clothed in the world of action. G‑d’s wisdom in Atzilus, with the Infinite Light within it, “journeyed and descended” step by step until it was clothed in physical things of this world.
בכדי שהאדם הלומד ההלכה יהיה שכלו משיג ותופס מהות ועצמיות החכמה שבההלכה מכיון שמדברת בענינים גשמיים שמהותן מושג.
so that the intellect of a person who learns the law will grasp and take hold of the essence and very being of the wisdom in the law, since it speaks of physical matters, whose essence is grasped.
So a person learning the law can grasp the very essence of the wisdom in it, because it deals with physical matters, whose essence the human mind can grasp.
The full union of the mind with G‑d’s wisdom, and with it of the soul with the Infinite Light, is achieved in the revealed Torah, because there G‑d’s wisdom has descended into physical matters that the mind can truly grasp.
Marei mekomos
- 1שבתוכה אור א״ס ב״ה · במים רבים שם (ע׳ ריב) ליתא תיבות אלו.
- 2נסעה וירדה עד · שם: נסעה וירדה כנ״ל בחכ׳ דבי״ע עד.
18ולכן נעשה התקשרות ויחוד אמיתי שכל האדם בחכמה שבההלכה
Therefore there comes about a true binding and union of a person’s intellect with the wisdom in the law.
So the learner’s mind truly unites with the wisdom in the law.
וכיון שהיא חכמתו ית׳ ממש המיוחדת במאציל׳ [במאצילה] א״ס ב״ה רק שנתלבשה בלבושי׳ [בלבושין / בלבושים] כו׳ ע״כ עי״ז נעשה ג״כ היחוד העליון שעצמיות נשמתו נכללת בעצמות אור א״ס המלובש בח״ע [בחכמה עילאה] המלובשת בהלכה זו.
And since it is actually His wisdom, may He be blessed, which is united with its Emanator, the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, only that it has been enclothed in garments, etc., therefore through this there also comes about the higher union: the very being of his soul is included in the very essence of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), which is enclothed in supernal Chochmah, which is enclothed in this law.
And that wisdom is G‑d’s own, one with the Infinite One, only clothed in garments; therefore the higher union follows: the essence of the soul is absorbed into the essence of the Infinite Light, which is clothed in supernal Chochmah, which in turn is clothed in this law.
אבל בלימוד חכמת הקבלה1 הואיל שחכמתו ית׳ שבענינים אלו מלובשת בעניינים רוחניים כמו בתיקון פרצופי האצי׳ או בבי״ע בבריאת שרפים וחיות2 כו׳ נשמות ומלאכים ג״ע [גן עדן] העליון וג״ע [וגן עדן] התחתון כו׳
But in the study of the wisdom of the Kabbalah, since His wisdom, may He be blessed, in these matters is enclothed in spiritual matters, such as the arrangement (tikkun) of the partzufim of Atzilus, or, in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, the creation of seraphim and chayos, etc., souls and angels, the upper Gan Eden and the lower Gan Eden, etc.,
Kabbalah is different. There G‑d’s wisdom is clothed in spiritual subjects: the arrangement of the partzufim (the “countenances,” configurations of Sefiros) of Atzilus, and in the lower worlds the creation of angels such as seraphim and chayos, souls, and the upper and lower Gan Eden, the realms in which souls delight in the G‑dliness they grasp.
הרי האדם הלומד זה דהיינו ידיעת סדר ההשתלשלות שבע״ח [שבעץ חיים] אין יד שכלו משיג מהות חכמה זו ששכל האדם אינו משיג המהות רק בעשיה ולא מהות הרוחניות איך ומה הוא רק מציאותו,
a person who learns this, that is, the knowledge of the order of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus) in Etz Chaim, his intellect cannot reach the essence of this wisdom; for the human intellect grasps the essence only in Asiyah, and not the essence of the spiritual, how and what it is, but only its existence.
One who studies this, the order of the worlds as Etz Chaim (the Arizal’s teaching as set down by Rabbi Chaim Vital) describes it, cannot grasp the essence of that wisdom. The human mind grasps what a thing is only in the physical world; of spiritual things it can know only that they exist, not how or what they are.
ולכן כשחכמתו ית׳ מלובשת בעשיה משיג מהותם ממש כמו בד׳ רשוית לשבת משיג היטב מהות רה״י [רשות היחיד] ומהות רה״ר [רשות הרבים].
Therefore, when His wisdom, may He be blessed, is enclothed in Asiyah, he grasps their actual essence: as with the four domains for Shabbos, he grasps well the essence of the private domain and the essence of the public domain.
So when G‑d’s wisdom is clothed in physical matters, the mind grasps them fully: in the laws of Shabbos, for example, one understands exactly what a private domain is and what a public domain is.
משא״כ כשהחכמה מדברת בענינים רוחניים שאין מהותן מושג כלל היינו בלימוד הקבלה אין שכלו תופס ומשיג ומתקשר כ״כ [כל כך] במהות חכמתו ית׳. רק במציאות׳ [במציאותה] ולא במהות׳ [במהותה]
Whereas when the wisdom speaks of spiritual matters, whose essence is not grasped at all, that is, in the study of the Kabbalah, his intellect does not take hold of, grasp and bind itself so much with the essence of His wisdom, may He be blessed, but only with its existence and not with its essence.
But when the wisdom speaks of spiritual matters, as in Kabbalah, whose essence is not grasped at all, the mind does not take hold of the essence of G‑d’s wisdom in the same way, but only of its existence.
ואין זה יחוד והתקשרות כמו בנגלה ששכל האדם תופס ומשיג מהות חכמתו ית׳ ולא מציאותה לבד.
And this is not a union and binding like [that] in the revealed [Torah], where a person’s intellect takes hold of and grasps the essence of His wisdom, may He be blessed, and not its existence alone.
So the union is not like the union in the revealed Torah, where the mind grasps the very essence of G‑d’s wisdom, not only that it exists.
The paragraph explains why the revealed Torah achieves a fuller union than Kabbalah: in physical law the mind grasps the very essence of G‑d’s wisdom, while in spiritual subjects it can know only that they exist.
Marei mekomos
- 1המלובשת — חכמת הקבלה · במים רבים שם: חכמת הקבלה עד״מ.
- 2בבריאת שרפים וחיות · במים רבים שם: בבחי׳ שרפים וחיות. ובסה״מ תרל״ו ח״ב (הנחות כ״ק אדמו״ר מוהרש״ב נ״ע) ע׳ תקיז: אפי׳ בבריאה כמו בשרפי׳ חיות ואופנים. וראה להלן ה, ג שו״ה ית׳.
19ולכן עי״ז דוקא נעשה ג״כ התכללות עצמיות נשמתו באור א״ס המלובש בחכמתו יתברך שהשיג מהותה ממש. שבתוכה א״ס ב״ה.
Therefore, specifically through this there also comes about the inclusion of the very being of his soul in the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) that is enclothed in His wisdom, may He be blessed, whose actual essence he has grasped, within which is the Infinite One, blessed be He.
This is why it is specifically through the revealed Torah that the soul’s essence is absorbed into the Infinite Light clothed in G‑d’s wisdom, whose essence the learner has truly grasped and within which is the Infinite One Himself.
משא״כ בלימוד ידיעת סדר ההשתלשלות שהשיג רק מציאות מחכמתו ית׳ ולא המהות ממש.
This is not so in learning the knowledge of the order of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus), where he has grasped only the existence of His wisdom, may He be blessed, and not the actual essence.
In studying the order of the worlds, by contrast, the learner grasps only the existence of G‑d’s wisdom, not its essence.
The conclusion: the soul’s essence is united with G‑d through the wisdom one truly grasps, which is the revealed law, more than through Kabbalistic knowledge of the worlds.
20וזהו מ״ש בפע״ח [בפרי עץ חיים] דקבלה1 היא באצילות ותלמוד הוא בבריאה ומשנה ביצי׳ [ביצירה] ומקרא הוא בעשי׳ [בעשיה].2 דלכאורה תמוה שהרי משנה ותלמוד הן תשבע״פ [תורה שבעל פה] ודאי כולם נמשכו מחכמה דאצי׳ וכ״ש [וכל שכן] המקרא תשב״כ [תורה שבכתב],
And this is what is written in Pri Etz Chaim, that Kabbalah is in Atzilus, Talmud is in Beriah, Mishnah in Yetzirah, and Scripture is in Asiyah. Seemingly this is puzzling: for Mishnah and Talmud are the Oral Torah, [and] certainly they were all drawn from the Chochmah of Atzilus; all the more so Scripture, the Written Torah.
Support from Pri Etz Chaim, the Arizal’s teaching on the mitzvos and prayer as set down by Rabbi Chaim Vital (in the Gate of the Conduct of Study, the Kehot note says), which assigns each kind of Torah study to a world: Kabbalah to Atzilus, Talmud to Beriah, Mishnah to Yetzirah, and Scripture to Asiyah. This is puzzling, since all of Torah, Written and Oral, comes from the Chochmah of Atzilus.
אלא דר״ל [דרוצה לומר] בבחי׳ ההתלבשות שבמקרא נתלבשה ח״ע [חכמה עילאה] גם בעשי׳ [בעשיה] שעיקר הקפידא הוא על תמונת האותיות ושיהיה הקלף כדין כו׳ ובתגין שבהם נרמזו רזין דאורייתא3 שלא יוכלו להתלבש בדיבור אלא ע״י עשי׳ [עשיה] כמו לחכימא ברמיזא4 כו׳
Rather, it means [that it speaks of] the level of the enclothing: in Scripture supernal Chochmah has been enclothed even in Asiyah, for the main strictness is about the form of the letters, and that the parchment be according to law, etc., and about the crowns (tagin), in which the secrets of the Torah are alluded to, which could not be enclothed in speech but only through action (asiyah), as [in] “for the wise, a hint,” etc.
The answer: the assignment describes where each is clothed. Scripture is clothed even in the world of action, since its essential laws concern the physical form of the letters, valid parchment, and the crowns (tagin) on the letters, which hint at secrets of the Torah that could not be put into speech, only into action (asiyah, the same word as the world of Asiyah), like a hint to the wise.
ומשנה ותלמוד הן נתלבשו ביצי׳ [ביצירה] ובריאה שהוא בחי׳ אותיות הדבור והחכמה שבהן.
And Mishnah and Talmud were enclothed in Yetzirah and Beriah, which are the level of the letters of speech and the wisdom in them.
Mishnah and Talmud are clothed in Yetzirah and Beriah, which correspond to the letters of speech and the wisdom expressed in them.
משא״כ קבלה היא באצי׳ דהיינו שאין מהות חכמה זו מושגת למטה כיון שלא נתלבשה בבריאה ויצי׳ [ויצירה] כמו משנה ותלמוד.
Whereas Kabbalah is in Atzilus, that is, the essence of this wisdom is not grasped below, since it has not been enclothed in Beriah and Yetzirah as Mishnah and Talmud have.
Kabbalah “is in Atzilus”: its wisdom has not come down into Beriah and Yetzirah, the realms of comprehension and speech, as Mishnah and Talmud have, so its essence is not grasped below.
לכן אין מושג רק מציאותה ולא מהותה משא״כ משנה ותלמוד מושג מהות חכמתו ית׳ שבהן.
Therefore only its existence is grasped, and not its essence; whereas in Mishnah and Talmud the essence of His wisdom, may He be blessed, that is in them is grasped.
So in Kabbalah only the existence of the wisdom is grasped, while in Mishnah and Talmud one grasps the essence of G‑d’s wisdom within them.
Pri Etz Chaim’s mapping of Kabbalah, Talmud, Mishnah and Scripture onto the four worlds is read as describing how far each has descended and so how far its essence can be grasped below.
Marei mekomos
- 1וזהו מ״ש בפע״ח דקבלה · מכאן עד להלן ה, ב שו״ה ע״ש, ליתא במים רבים שם.
- 2בפע״ח דקבלה היא באצילות . . בעשי׳ · שער הנהגת הלימוד.
- 3ובתגין שבהם נרמזו רזין דאורייתא · ראה לקו״ש חי״ט ע׳ 423 הערה 32. חל״ט ע׳ 149 הערה 34.
- 4לחכימא ברמיזא · Zohar I, 26b
21וזהו ענין משנה ביצירה כו׳ שעי״ז מושג מהותן. אך להבין לפ״ז [לפי זה] תוכן ענין לימוד פנימית התורה
And this is the matter of “Mishnah in Yetzirah,” etc.: that through this their essence is grasped. But according to this, one must understand the substance of the study of the inner dimension (pnimiyus) of the Torah,
“Mishnah in Yetzirah” means that through the Mishnah’s descent into speech its essence can be grasped. This raises a question about the study of the inner dimension of the Torah, the Kabbalah.
שהאריכו בזהר ותיקונים ובע״ח [ובעץ חיים] בחיוב לימוד זה1 וכמ״ש ג״כ בספר ראשית חכמה בהקדמה ובשל״ה [ובשני לוחות הברית] במסכת שבועות שלו בפרק נר מצוה הפליג מאד במעלת לימוד זה.
for in the Zohar, the Tikkunim and Etz Chaim they elaborated on the obligation of this study, as is also written in the book Reishis Chochmah, in the introduction; and the Shelah, in his Tractate Shavuos, in the chapter Ner Mitzvah, greatly extolled the virtue of this study.
The Zohar, the Tikkunei Zohar and Etz Chaim insist on the obligation to study it, and Reishis Chochmah (Rabbi Eliyahu de Vidas’s work of ethics), in its introduction, and the Shelah, in his Tractate Shavuos, chapter Ner Mitzvah, praise it greatly; what, then, does it achieve?
Having ranked the revealed Torah above Kabbalah in the union it achieves, the maamar asks why the Kabbalists so strongly urge the study of the inner Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1לימוד פנימיות התורה . . בחיוב לימוד זה · ראה גם סה״מ תקס״ה ע׳ ד (ובהנסמן שם).
22ויובן ענין זה בהקדים תחלה ענין שליש במקרא.
This matter will be understood by first prefacing the matter of “a third in Scripture.”
The answer begins with the Talmud’s instruction to devote “a third” of one’s study to Scripture.
כי הנה ענין הלימוד במקרא אינו ע״ד לימוד משנה ותלמוד שהעיקר הוא להשיג החכמה שבהן שעי״ז יתקשר שכל האדם בחכמה זו שבתורה כו׳ אלא דצריך ג״כ להוציא הדברים בדיבור פה דוקא
For the study of Scripture is not in the manner of the study of Mishnah and Talmud, where the main thing is to grasp the wisdom in them, so that through this a person’s intellect will be bound with this wisdom in the Torah, etc., except that one must also bring out the words in actual speech of the mouth;
Studying Scripture is different in kind from studying Mishnah and Talmud. There the main thing is to grasp the wisdom, so that the mind binds itself to the Torah’s wisdom; the words must also be spoken aloud.
אבל מ״מ אם אומר ההלכה ואינו מבין אינו נחשב לו ללימוד כלל כמ״ש במ״א סי׳ נ׳,
but nevertheless, if he says the law and does not understand [it], it is not considered learning for him at all, as is written in the Magen Avraham, section 50.
But reciting a law without understanding it does not count as study at all, as the Magen Avraham (Orach Chaim, section 50) rules.
משא״כ בעסק המקרא ותשב״כ [ותורה שבכתב] אם מוציא בשפתיו אע״פ [אף על פי] שאינו מבין אפי׳ [אפילו] פי׳ המלות מפני שהוא ע״ז ה״ז [הרי זה] מקיים מצות ולמדתם, שלפיכך כל ע״ה [עם הארץ] מברך ברכת התורה בשחר לפני הפסוקים וכן כשעולה לס״ת [לספר תורה],
Whereas in occupation with Scripture and the Written Torah, if he utters [it] with his lips, even though he does not understand even the meaning of the words because he is unlearned, he thereby fulfills the mitzvah of “and you shall learn them.” That is why every unlearned person recites the blessing over the Torah in the morning before the verses, and likewise when he is called up to the Torah scroll.
With Scripture, the Written Torah, it is otherwise: even one who does not understand the words, because he is unlearned, fulfils the mitzvah of Torah study by saying them. That is why every unlearned person says the blessing over the Torah in the morning before reciting verses, and when he is called up to the Torah.
וכ״כ [וכן כתב] בפרדס שכ״ז [שכל זה] פ״א1 גבי לימוד המקרא שגם מי שלא יבין לחבר התיבות גם הוא אם יעסוק בו יומם ולילה שכרו אתו ופעולתו לפניו כו׳,
And so it is written in the Pardes, Gate 27, chapter 1, concerning the study of Scripture: that even one who does not understand how to join the words, he too, if he occupies himself with it day and night, “his reward is with him and his recompense before him,” etc.;
Pardes Rimonim, Rabbi Moshe Cordovero’s work of Kabbalah (Gate 27, chapter 1), also says that even one who cannot connect the words, if he engages in Scripture day and night, is fully rewarded.
ואדרבה כתב והלומד בתורה לדעת כמי שלומד בספר זכרונות כו׳ הלואי שלא יפסיד כו׳ ע״ש.
and on the contrary, he wrote: “And one who learns the Torah [only] to know [it], as one who learns from a book of chronicles, etc., if only he would not lose,” etc.; see there.
On the contrary, Pardes adds, one who learns the Torah merely for information, as one would read a history book, may well lose by it.
Studying Scripture is a mitzvah through the words themselves, even without understanding, unlike Mishnah and Talmud, whose study requires grasping their wisdom. This prepares the answer about the study of the inner Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1בפרדס שכ״ז פ״א · ולהעיר מפמ״ג שם. — לקו״ש שם.
Scripture, the inner Torah and the thirds of study ¶23–30
23והענין כי הנה מה שבא מהתשב״כ [מהתורה שבכתב] בהתגלות בתשבע״פ [בתורה שבעל פה] דהיינו ידיעת איך ומה לעשות הציצית והתפילין כו׳ עד״מ,
The explanation is this. What comes from the Written Torah into revelation in the Oral Torah, namely, the knowledge of how and what to do [in] the tzitzis and the tefillin, etc., for example,
The explanation of the study of Scripture begins. The Written Torah mentions mitzvos such as tzitzis and tefillin; how to make and use them is revealed only in the Oral Torah.
זהו התלבשות אור א״ס בבחי׳ חכמה וח״ע [וחכמה עילאה] נתלבשה בח״ת [בחכמה תתאה] עד שנתלבשה בחכמה דבריאה יצירה ומשם נתלבשה בהלכות דתשבע״פ [דתורה שבעל פה] עד שנתלבשה החכמה להיות מושג ונתפס בשכל אנושי.
this is the enclothing of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) in the level of Chochmah: supernal Chochmah was enclothed in the lower Chochmah, until it was enclothed in the Chochmah of Beriah [and] Yetzirah, and from there it was enclothed in the laws of the Oral Torah, until the wisdom was enclothed so as to be grasped and held by human intellect.
That revelation follows the path traced above: the Infinite Light is clothed in supernal Chochmah, which descends through the lower Chochmah and the wisdom of the worlds of Beriah and Yetzirah into the laws of the Oral Torah, where a human mind can grasp it.
אמנם יש בתורה דברים שלא ניתנו להתלבש למטה בחכמה ושכל כלל וכמו ויוסף הורד מצרימה1 ויקנהו פוטיפר,
However, there are things in the Torah that were not given to be enclothed below in wisdom and intellect at all, such as “And Yosef was brought down to Egypt, and Potiphar bought him.”
But some parts of the Torah were never meant to be clothed in wisdom that the mind can grasp. An example is the plain narrative “And Yosef was brought down to Egypt, and Potiphar bought him” (Genesis 39:1).
(ועיין בפ׳ המשניות להרמב״ם [להרבי משה בן מימון] פרק חלק2 וז״ל [וזה לשונו] ואין הפרש בין ובני חם כוש3 ומצרים. ושם אשתו מהיטבאל.45 ותמנע היתה פלגש.67 ובין אנכי8 ה׳ אלקיך. ושמע ישראל9 כי הכל מפי הגבורה),
(And see the Rambam’s Commentary on the Mishnah, the chapter Chelek; these are his words: “And there is no difference between ‘And the sons of Cham: Cush and Mitzrayim,’ ‘And the name of his wife was Mehetavel,’ ‘And Timna was a concubine,’ and ‘I am Havayah your G‑d’ and ‘Hear, O Israel’; for all is from the mouth of the Almighty.”)
The Rambam, in his Eighth Principle of Faith (in his commentary on the chapter Chelek of Sanhedrin), says that there is no difference in holiness between bare genealogies and stories, such as “the sons of Cham” or “Timna was a concubine,” and “I am Havayah your G‑d” or the Shema: all of it was given by G‑d.
שבחי׳ ההמשכה מאור א״ס המרומז באותיות אלו וספור זה לא יוכל להתלבש כלל בחכמה ושכל.
For the level of the drawing-down from the Infinite Light that is alluded to in these letters and this narrative cannot be enclothed in wisdom and intellect at all.
The divine light that such letters and stories carry cannot be put into terms of wisdom and intellect at all.
ולכן ההמשכה היא רק ע״י האותיות והפסוקים בלבד כי נעוץ סופן בתחלתן10 כו׳, ולכן גם מה שלא נתלבש בחכמה דהיינו שהוא מבחי׳ כתר שלמעלה מהחכמה
Therefore the drawing-down is only through the letters and the verses alone, for “their end is wedged in their beginning,” etc. Therefore even what was not enclothed in Chochmah, that is, what is from the level of Keser (the Crown), which is above Chochmah
So it is drawn down only through the letters and verses themselves. Sefer Yetzirah says of the Sefiros that “their end is wedged in their beginning”: the lowest level, the bare letters, is joined to the highest, Keser, which is above Chochmah.
(כי אורייתא מחכמה נפקת.1112 נפקת דייקא שהתגלותה הוא מבחי׳ חכמה אבל שרשה בעצם למעלה מהחכמה וכמ״ש לעיל בד״ה ויקרא אל משה,
(for “the Torah comes forth from Chochmah”: “comes forth,” specifically, that its revelation is from the level of Chochmah, but its root in essence is above Chochmah, as is written above in the discourse beginning “And He called to Moshe”;
A parenthesis: the Zohar says “the Torah comes forth from Chochmah.” The Alter Rebbe stresses “comes forth”: the Torah is revealed from Chochmah, but its root is above Chochmah, as explained in the discourse “And He called to Moshe” earlier in Likkutei Torah.
ולכן מה שנתלבש ממנה בבחי׳ חכמה הוא רק הארה ע״י שערות וצמצומים כי אבא יונק ממזלא כו׳ אבל עצם האור שבכתר לא יוכל להתלבש בחכמה).
and therefore what of it was enclothed in the level of Chochmah is only a radiance, through “hairs” and contractions, for “Abba draws from the mazal,” etc.; but the essence of the light in Keser cannot be enclothed in Chochmah),
What of the Torah is clothed in Chochmah is only a narrow ray, passed down through “hairs” and contractions, as Kabbalah says, “Abba (Chochmah) draws from the mazal” (a channel from Keser). The essence of the light in Keser cannot be clothed in Chochmah.
ואעפ״כ [ואף על פי כן] נמשך הוא ג״כ ע״י האותיות שבתשב״כ [שבתורה שבכתב] ולכן נקרא מקרא שקורא וממשיך התגלות אור א״ס ע״י האותיות אף שאינו משיג כלל,13 ועמ״ש מענין אותיות התורה איך ששרשן למעלה מהחכמה בד״ה נר חנוכה כו׳ כדי שתהא מזוזה מימין14 כו׳ ע״ש
nevertheless, it too is drawn down through the letters of the Written Torah. Therefore it is called Mikra (Scripture), for one calls (korei) and draws down the revelation of the Infinite Light through the letters, even though he does not grasp [it] at all. And see what is written on the matter of the letters of the Torah, how their root is above Chochmah, in the discourse beginning “The Chanukah lamp,” etc., “so that the mezuzah be on the right,” etc.; see there;
Yet that higher light, too, is drawn down through the letters of the Written Torah. That is why Scripture is called Mikra, from korei, “calls”: the reader calls down the light through the letters even without understanding them. The text refers to the Chanukah discourse on the root of the Torah’s letters above Chochmah, on the Talmud’s rule that the Chanukah lamp is placed on the left “so that the mezuzah be on the right.”
וסד״ה צאינה וראינה גבי בעטרה שעטרה15 שהעטרה נעשה מאבנים טובות הוא בחי׳ אותיות התורה,
and at the end of the discourse beginning “Go out and see,” regarding “with the crown with which [his mother] crowned [him],” that the crown, which is made of precious stones, is the level of the letters of the Torah.
The text also refers to the end of the discourse “Go out and see” (Song of Songs 3:11), which explains “the crown with which his mother crowned him,” made of precious stones, as the letters of the Torah.
(וכמארז״ל [וכמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] כל התורה שמותיו של הקב״ה. ועד״ז יובן16 מארז״ל [מאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] יפה שיחתן של עבדי אבות מתורתן של בנים17 כו׳ כי הן המשכות ממקור התורה כמו שהוא עדיין למעלה מבחינת חכמה,
(As our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “The whole Torah is names of the Holy One, blessed be He.” And in this way one will understand the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, “The conversation of the servants of the Patriarchs is more beautiful than the Torah of the children,” etc.; for they are drawings-down from the source of the Torah as it is still above the level of Chochmah.
Another parenthesis: “the whole Torah is names of the Holy One,” so its letters carry His light regardless of their plain meaning. This explains the Midrash that “the conversation of the servants of the Patriarchs is more beautiful than the Torah of the children,” since those stories draw from the source of the Torah as it is still above Chochmah.
וע״כ האריכה התורה הרבה בסיפור מעשה דאליעזר עבד אברהם כו׳ יותר מבכמה גופי תורה מתורתן של בנים כו׳.
Therefore the Torah elaborated greatly in the account of the episode of Eliezer, the servant of Avraham, etc., more than on many essential laws of the Torah, [which are] “the Torah of the children,” etc.
That is why the Torah tells the story of Eliezer, Avraham’s servant, at great length, at greater length than many essential laws, which are “the Torah of the children.”
ועד״ז הוא ענין סיפור ויוסף הורד מצרימה כו׳ כנ״ל. והמשכה זו הוא ע״י האותיות דוקא. ולכן אף ע״ה [עם הארץ] שאינו מבין פי׳ המלות ממשיך משא״כ בתשבע״פ [בתורה שבעל פה] שנתלבשה בחכמה לכך כשאינו מבין אינו ממשיך
In the same way is the matter of the narrative “And Yosef was brought down to Egypt,” etc., as mentioned above. And this drawing-down is specifically through the letters; therefore even an unlearned person who does not understand the meaning of the words draws [it] down. Whereas in the Oral Torah, which has been enclothed in Chochmah, therefore when he does not understand he does not draw down.
The narrative of Yosef going down to Egypt is the same. This light is drawn down only through the letters, so even an unlearned person who does not understand the words draws it down; in the Oral Torah, which is clothed in Chochmah, without understanding nothing is drawn down.
אבל בתשב״כ [בתורה שבכתב] ממשיך אף שאינו מבין ואינו תלוי כ״כ [כל כך] בהבנת הפי׳ יען מקור המשכה זו הוא מלמעלה מהחכמה כו׳ והיינו ע״י האותיות ולכן נק׳ תשב״כ [תורה שבכתב] מקרא שקוראים וממשיכים ע״י האותיות ועמ״ש מענין מקרא סד״ה ענין ק״ש [קריאת שמע]).
But in the Written Torah he draws down even though he does not understand, and it does not depend so much on understanding the meaning, because the source of this drawing-down is from above Chochmah, etc., and this is through the letters. Therefore the Written Torah is called Mikra, for one calls and draws down through the letters. And see what is written on the matter of Mikra at the end of the discourse beginning “The matter of the recital of the Shema.”)
In the Written Torah one draws down the light even without understanding, since its source is above Chochmah and it comes through the letters. Hence the name Mikra, “calling.” The text refers to the end of the discourse on the Shema for more on Mikra.
והנה בכלל לימוד המקרא הוא ג״כ לימוד האגדות שהרי רוב האגדות הם על הפסוקים ומעט מוסר וגם הם אין מושגים ובכלל מקרא יחשב.
Now, included in the study of Scripture is also the study of the Aggados, for most of the Aggados are on the verses, with a little ethical instruction; and they too are not grasped, and they are counted as included in Scripture.
The Aggados, the non-legal teachings of the Talmud and Midrash, belong with Scripture: most of them comment on verses, with a little ethical instruction, and they too are not grasped in their essence.
And included in Scripture is also the study of the inner dimension (pnimiyus) of the Torah, for the Midrash of the Zohar is on the verses of the Torah.
The inner Torah, the Kabbalah, also belongs with Scripture, since the Zohar is a Midrash on the verses of the Torah. This begins the answer to the question about studying the inner Torah.
The paragraph explains that the Written Torah carries a light from above Chochmah that is drawn down through its letters alone, even without understanding, so that its study counts even for one who does not understand. The Aggados and the Kabbalah are classed with Scripture.
A Kehot note cites the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah, which uses this to explain the Sages’ saying that studying Scripture is “a measure and not a measure”: unlike Mishnah and Talmud, where the essence of G‑d’s wisdom is grasped, in Scripture only the letters are grasped, akin to knowing that something exists without knowing what it is, as in Kabbalah. The Zohar’s “the Torah comes forth from Chochmah” appears in several places, which the note lists.
Marei mekomos
- 1ויוסף הורד מצרימה · Genesis 39:1
- 2פרק חלק · ב”היסוד השמיני”.
- 3ובני חם כוש · Genesis 10:6
- 4ושם אשתו מהיטבאל · שם לו, לט.
- 5ושם אשתו מהיטבאל · Genesis 36:39
- 6ותמנע היתה פלגש · שם לו, יב.
- 7ותמנע היתה פלגש · Genesis 36:12
- 8ואין הפרש בין ובני חם כוש ומצרים ושם אשתו מהיטבאל ותמנע היתה פלגש ובין אנכי ה׳ אלקיך ושמע ישראל כי הכל מפי הגבורה · Rambam on Mishnah Sanhedrin 10:1
- 9שמע ישראל · Deuteronomy 6:4
- 10נעוץ סופן בתחלתן · Sefer Yetzirah 1:7
- 11אורייתא מחכמה נפקת · Zohar, Beshalach 28:377–388
- 12אורייתא מחכמה נפקת · Zohar, Yitro 21:378–22:389
- 13מקרא שקורא . . ע״י האותיות אף שאינו משיג כלל · באוה״ת על מארז״ל וענינים ע׳ רצג מציין: ובזה יובן מארז״ל [ב״מ לג, א] העוסקי׳ במקרא מדה ואינה מדה כי לא כמו משנה ותלמוד השגת מהות חכמתו משא״כ במקרא שאין החכמה מושג רק האותיו׳ וזהו כעין השגת המציאו׳ ולא המהות כמו בקבלה. [וראה ד״ה העוסק במקרא בס׳ מאמרי אדה״ז הקצרים ע׳ שנד].
- 14כדי שתהא מזוזה מימין · Shabbat 22a:2
- 15בעטרה שעטרה · Song of Songs 3:11
- 16ובין — הגבורה · במים רבים שם (ע׳ ריג): הגבורה כו׳.
- 17יפה שיחתן של עבדי אבות מתורתן של בנים · Bereshit Rabbah 60:8
- 18אנכי ה׳ אלקיך · Exodus 20:2
- 19אורייתא מחכ׳ נפקת · זח״ב (סב, א. פה, א) וזח״ג (קפב, א). [כ].
24ועוד שגם בלימוד רזין דאורייתא אינו משיג רק המציאות מההשתלשלות ולא המהות.
Moreover, even in the study of the secrets of the Torah one grasps only the existence of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus), and not the essence.
A further reason the inner Torah belongs with Scripture: even in studying the secrets of the Torah one grasps only that the chain of worlds exists, not what it is.
א״כ אינו דומה למשנה ותלמוד שמשיג מהות חכמתו ית׳ ובלימוד ההשתלשלות אינו משיג כלל מהות חכמה זו מהו בחי׳ אופנים וחיות ושרפים וכ״ש [וכל שכן] למעלה יותר כו׳. אלא רק ידיעת המציאות.
If so, it is not like Mishnah and Talmud, where one grasps the essence of His wisdom, may He be blessed; whereas in the study of the chain of descent one does not grasp at all the essence of this wisdom, what the level of the ofanim, chayos and seraphim is, and all the more so [what is] higher, etc., but only the knowledge of [their] existence.
So it is unlike Mishnah and Talmud, in which one grasps the essence of G‑d’s wisdom. In studying the order of the worlds one cannot grasp what the angels called ofanim, chayos and seraphim really are, still less anything higher, but only know that they exist.
Kabbalistic study yields knowledge that the spiritual worlds exist but not of their essence, and so it is akin to the study of Scripture rather than of Mishnah and Talmud.
25ואעפ״כ [ואף על פי כן] דבר גדול הוא מאד כיון דא״א להיות בזה השגת המהות.
Nevertheless, it is a very great thing, since in this a grasp of the essence is impossible.
Nevertheless, knowing that these levels exist is a very great thing, precisely because their essence cannot be grasped.
וה״ז [והרי זה] כמו שבמקרא אע״פ [אף על פי] שא״א להיות ההשגה בבחי׳ חכמה כיון ששרשה למעלה מהחכמה לכן גם מה שאומר האותיות דבר גדול ועצום הוא אף שאותיות הוא רק בחי׳ האחרונה ונקרא בחי׳ דומם לגבי השכל כו׳. כמ״כ [כמו כן] ידיעת המציאות מהפנימית אע״פ [אף על פי] שאינו משיג כלל המהות דבר גדול הוא עד להפליא.
This is like Scripture: although comprehension [of it] on the level of Chochmah is impossible, since its root is above Chochmah, therefore even his saying the letters is a great and mighty thing, although letters are only the last level and are called the level of the inanimate relative to intellect, etc. So too the knowledge of the existence of the inner dimension, even though he does not grasp the essence at all, is a great thing, wondrously so.
It is like Scripture, which cannot be grasped as wisdom because its root is above Chochmah: just as merely saying the letters of Scripture is great, though letters are the lowest level, like the “inanimate” relative to intellect, so knowing that the inner realities exist, without grasping their essence, is wondrously great.
The study of the inner Torah is valued for the same reason as the study of Scripture: it connects one with what lies beyond comprehension.
26ועיין זח״ג [זהר חלק ג] פ׳ אחרי דע״ג א׳ ג׳ דרגין אינון מתקשרין דא בדא,1 ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה כי קרוב אליך הדבר מאד,2
And see the Zohar, Part III, Parshas Acharei, folio 73a: “Three levels are bound to one another.” And see what is written about this in the discourse beginning “For the thing is very near to you.”
The Zohar says that three levels are bound together, namely the Holy One, the Torah and Israel. In Likkutei Torah, Nitzavim, on “For the thing is very near to you,” the Alter Rebbe explains that every drawing-down of the Infinite Light depends on Israel’s Torah study below, for “whoever reads and studies, the Holy One reads and studies opposite him.”
והנה כיון שהתורה היא הממוצע המקשר ומחבר נש״י [נשמות ישראל] להקב״ה, והממוצע יש בו שני בחינות סתים וגליא א״כ בחי׳ הפנימיות הנק׳ סתים הוא המקשר ומחבר בחי׳ פנימיות של הנשמה לבחי׳ פנימיות אלהותו ית׳.
Now, since the Torah is the intermediary that binds and joins the souls of Israel to the Holy One, blessed be He, and the intermediary has two aspects, hidden and revealed (stim and galya), then the inner aspect, which is called hidden, is what binds and joins the inner aspect of the soul to the inner aspect of His G‑dliness, may He be blessed.
The Torah is the intermediary that binds the souls of Israel to G‑d, and like any intermediary it has a hidden side and a revealed side. Its hidden side, the inner Torah, binds the inner dimension of the soul to the inner dimension of G‑d.
This gives the special role of the inner Torah: as the hidden side of the intermediary between Israel and G‑d, it joins the innermost soul to G‑d’s innermost being.
That discourse adds that “reading” corresponds to supernal Chochmah, the Written Torah, and “studying” to the lower Chochmah, the Oral Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1דרגין אינון מתקשרין דא בדא · Zohar, Achrei Mot 49:296–50:305
- 2כי קרוב אליך הדבר מאד · Deuteronomy 30:14
And see the Zohar, Part III, Beha’alosecha, [folio] 152a. And see what is written on the verse “The kindnesses of Havayah, for we have not ceased,” concerning there being two levels of Chesed (kindness).
The text points to the Zohar in Beha’alosecha (3:152a), which calls the Torah’s plain stories its “garment,” beneath which lie its body and soul. It also points to the letter in Iggeres HaKodesh (section 10) on “The kindnesses of Havayah, for we have not ceased,” which, citing the Zohar, distinguishes two levels of Chesed: “worldly kindness” (chesed olam), given within measure, and the supernal kindness that is “abundant in kindness” (rav chesed), beyond all limit.
ועד״ז יובן קצת ענין סוכ״ע וממכ״ע [וממלא כל עלמין] סתים וגליא כו׳, ועמ״ש בד״ה שובה ישראל2 בענין מ״ש אם יהיה אלקים עמדי3 כו׳ והיה הוי׳ לי לאלקים,4
In this way one will understand somewhat the matter of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) and the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin), hidden and revealed, etc. And see what is written in the discourse beginning “Return, O Israel,” on the matter of what is written, “If Elokim will be with me,” etc., “then Havayah will be Elokim to me.”
The same pair, hidden and revealed, helps explain the two modes of G‑d’s light: the light that encompasses all worlds, which stays hidden, and the light that fills them, which is revealed. The text refers to the discourse “Return, O Israel” (Likkutei Torah, Shabbos Shuvah) on Yaakov’s vow, “If Elokim will be with me … then Havayah will be Elokim to me.” There the Alter Rebbe reads it so: after all the stages of service, Yaakov will reach a nullification in the Infinite Light so great that, beside it, even the Name Havayah counts as Elokim, a contraction.
ועמ״ש מענין סתים וגליא סד״ה להבין ענין לחם משנה. ועמ״ש מזה בביאור ע״פ לריח שמניך.5
And see what is written on the matter of hidden and revealed at the end of the discourse beginning “To understand the matter of the double bread (lechem mishneh)”; and see what is written about this in the explanation on the verse “For the fragrance of your oils.”
The text also refers to the discourses on the double bread of Shabbos (Torah Ohr, Beshalach) and on “For the fragrance of your oils” (Song of Songs 1:3; Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim), which treat hidden and revealed.
(ועוי״ל [ועוד יש לומר] בענין מעלת העסק בפנימיות עפמ״ש [על פי מה שכתוב] באגה״ק [באגרת הקודש] בד״ה להבין מ״ש בפע״ח [בפרי עץ חיים] דלימוד פנימיות כוונת המצות לא גרע מלימוד הלכותיה ואדרבה כו׳ אף שאינו משיג המהות6 עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו],
(One may further say, concerning the virtue of occupation with the inner dimension (pnimiyus), according to what is written in Iggeres HaKodesh, in the discourse beginning “To understand what is written in Pri Etz Chaim,” that the study of the inner dimension, the intentions of the mitzvos, “is no less than the study of their laws, and on the contrary, etc., even though one does not grasp the essence.” End of quote.
A long parenthesis adds a further answer about the value of studying the inner Torah. The text quotes the Alter Rebbe’s essay “To understand what is written in Pri Etz Chaim,” which it cites as Iggeres HaKodesh and which is printed in Tanya’s Kuntres Acharon: studying the inner meaning of the mitzvos is no less than studying their laws, even without grasping its essence.
ור״ל [ורוצה לומר] מפני שהמצוה מושג מהותה לכן ידיעת סודות המצוה אף שאינו משיג המהות לא גרע כו׳. ואף שכ׳ [שכתב] שם משא״כ בסדר ההשתלשלות אף אם השיג המציאות לא עדיף מצד עצמו כלימוד המצות שמשיג ותופס המהות כו׳.
That is to say: since the essence of the mitzvah is grasped, therefore the knowledge of the secrets of the mitzvah, even though one does not grasp the essence, is no less, etc. And although he wrote there that it is not so with the order of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus): even if one has grasped [its] existence, it is not in itself superior, like the study of the mitzvos, in which one grasps and takes hold of the essence, etc.,
The reason is that the mitzvah itself is grasped, so knowing its secrets is no less, even without grasping their essence. The same essay says that knowing the order of the worlds is different: knowing only that they exist is not in itself superior to the study of the mitzvos, where the essence is grasped.
הרי מסיק אח״כ אלא שידיעת המציאות מההשתלשלות היא ג״כ מצוה רמה ונשאה ואדרבה עולה על כולנה כמ״ש וידעת היום.7 דע את אלקי אביך8 כו׳. ומב יאה ללב שלם כו׳ שהוא העיקר.
he concludes afterwards: “but the knowledge of the existence of the chain of descent is also a lofty and exalted mitzvah; on the contrary, it surpasses them all, as it is written, ‘And you shall know this day,’ [and] ‘Know the G‑d of your father,’ etc., and it brings to ‘a whole heart,’ etc., which is the main thing.”
Yet the essay concludes that knowing that the chain of worlds exists is itself a lofty mitzvah, even greater than the others, fulfilling “And you shall know this day” (Deuteronomy 4:39) and “Know the G‑d of your father” (I Chronicles 28:9), and that it brings one to “a whole heart,” which is the main thing.
ור״ל [ורוצה לומר] כמ״ש ויצונו ה׳ לעשות את כל החוקים האלה ליראה את ה׳ אלהינו. הרי תכלית התומ״צ [התורה ומצות] הוא לבא ללב שלם שהוא ליראה את ה׳,
That is to say, as it is written, “And Havayah commanded us to do all these statutes, to fear Havayah our G‑d”: thus the purpose of Torah and mitzvos is to come to a whole heart, which is “to fear Havayah.”
The Alter Rebbe explains this by the verse “And Havayah commanded us to do all these statutes, to fear Havayah our G‑d” (Deuteronomy 6:24): the goal of Torah and mitzvos is a whole heart, which is the fear of G‑d.
ולכן ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שהתורה נק׳ תרעא לדרתא9 לגבי יראה כו׳ והיינו לגבי יראה עילאה וכמ״ש בסש״ב [בספר של בינונים] ס״פ כ״ג והשגת המציאות הוא להפשיט מגשמיות רק שזו היא מצוה א׳ מתרי״ג והאדם צריך לקיים כל התרי״ג כו׳
Therefore our Sages, of blessed memory, said that the Torah is called “a gate to the courtyard” in relation to awe, etc., that is, in relation to the higher awe, as is written in Sefer shel Beinonim, at the end of chapter 23. And the grasp of [its] existence serves to strip away physicality; except that this is one mitzvah of the 613, and a person must fulfill all 613, etc.
So the Sages call the Torah a “gate to the courtyard” of awe, meaning the higher awe, as Tanya, chapter 23, explains. Knowing the existence of the higher worlds helps to strip away a physical outlook; but it is only one of the 613 mitzvos, and a person must keep all of them.
לכך צריך להרבות בלימוד כל התרי״ג וקיומן בפ״מ [בפועל ממש] במודומ״ע [במחשבה דבור ומעשה] כו׳ א״כ הרי בידיעת ההשתלשלות אף שאינו משיג כלל המהות מקיים מצות וידעת כו׳ ולא גרע מלימוד ההלכות):10
Therefore one must devote much study to all 613 and to fulfilling them in actual deed, in thought, speech and action, etc. If so, in knowing the chain of descent, even though one does not grasp the essence at all, one fulfills the mitzvah of “And you shall know,” etc., and it is no less than the study of the laws.)
Therefore one must study all the mitzvos at length and keep them in thought, speech and action. Still, knowing the order of the worlds, even without grasping its essence, fulfils the mitzvah “And you shall know” and is no less than studying the laws.
The paragraph adds sources for the hidden and revealed sides of the Torah and of G‑d’s light. A long parenthesis, based on Tanya’s Kuntres Acharon, shows that studying the inner Torah fulfils its own mitzvah of knowing G‑d and leads to a whole heart, though it does not replace the study and practice of all the mitzvos.
The Likkutei Torah discourse on “For the fragrance of your oils” makes the same three-part division: in Mishnah and Talmud one grasps the essence of G‑d’s wisdom, clothed in physical matters, while in the narratives of Scripture it is not grasped at all. It cites the Zohar in Beha’alosecha that the plain sense of the Torah’s stories is “the garment of the Torah,” and Rabbi Moshe Zacuto’s comment that a story such as that of the kings of Edom happened as told, yet hides the secrets of the world of Tohu. A Kehot note records that some editions of Tanya read “a great and exalted mitzvah,” while the Tanya correction table, followed here, reads “a lofty and exalted mitzvah.”
Marei mekomos
- 1חסדי ה׳ כי לא תמנו · Lamentations 3:22
- 2שובה ישראל · Hosea 14:2
- 3אם יהיה אלקים עמדי · Genesis 28:20
- 4והיה הוי׳ לי לאלקים · Genesis 28:21
- 5לריח שמניך · Song of Songs 1:3
- 6דלימוד פנימיות כוונת המצות לא גרע מלימוד הלכותיה ואדרבה כו׳ אף שאינו משיג המהות · Tanya, Part V; Kuntres Acharon 4:24
- 7וידעת היום · Deuteronomy 4:39
- 8דע את אלקי אביך · I Chronicles 28:9
- 9תרעא לדרתא · Shabbat 31b:1
- 10ויצונו ה׳ לעשות את כל החוקים האלה ליראה את ה׳ אלהינו · Deuteronomy 6:24
28ה ועפ״ז [ועל פי זה] יתורץ מה שנדחקו גדולי המפרשים בפי׳ מימרא זו דלעולם ישלש אדם שנותיו שליש במקרא שליש במשנה שליש בתלמוד1 דהר״ן [דהרבינו נסים] ספ״ק [סוף פרק קמא] דע״ז [דעבודה זרה] כ׳ [כתב] ולאו דוקא שישליש ימותיו בשוה כו׳.
5. According to this, [the difficulty] will be resolved with which the great commentators struggled in explaining this saying: “A person should always divide his years into three: a third in Scripture, a third in Mishnah, a third in Talmud.” For the Ran, at the end of the first chapter of Avodah Zarah, wrote: “And it does not mean precisely that he should divide his days equally,” etc.
Section 5 applies all this to a difficult Talmudic saying: a person should divide his years into three, a third for Scripture, a third for Mishnah and a third for Talmud. The Ran (Rabbeinu Nissim), on the first chapter of Avodah Zarah, wrote that it does not mean exactly equal portions.
והרמב״ם [והרבי משה בן מימון] פ״א מהל׳ [מהלכות / מהלכה] ת״ת [תלמוד תורה] ס״ל [סבירא ליה / סבירא להו] דישלש היינו לשלישים שוים ממש אלא דנתכוין לתרץ קושיית הר״ן [הרבינו נסים] במ״ש שזהו בתחלת למודו של אדם אבל כשיגדיל בחכמה כו׳ ויקרא בעתים מזומנים תשב״כ [תורה שבכתב]2 כו׳.
And the Rambam, in chapter 1 of the Laws of Torah Study, holds that “divide into three” means into actually equal thirds; but he intended to resolve the Ran’s difficulty in what he wrote, that this is at the beginning of a person’s learning, “but when he grows great in wisdom,” etc., “he should read the Written Torah at set times,” etc.
The Rambam, in the Laws of Torah Study, takes it as truly equal thirds, but answers the Ran’s difficulty by limiting it to the beginning of one’s learning: once a person has grown in wisdom, he reads the Written Torah only at set times.
The maamar takes up the Talmud’s division of study into thirds and the commentators’ difficulty with it, which its distinction between Scripture and the inner Torah will resolve.
Marei mekomos
- 1לעולם ישלש אדם שנותיו שליש במקרא שליש במשנה שליש בתלמוד · Avodah Zarah 19b:1–2
- 2כשיגדיל בחכמה כו׳ ויקרא בעתים מזומנים תשב״כ · Mishneh Torah, Torah Study 1:12
29ולפ״ז [ולפי זה] דוחק קצת לשון לעולם ישלש כו׳ וגם מה שהקשו בגמ׳ [בגמרא] מי ידע כמה חיי. דמזה משמע דכל שני חייו ישלש כו׳.
According to this, the wording “always divide into three,” etc., is somewhat strained, and so is what was asked in the Gemara, “Does one know how long he will live?”, from which it is implied that all the years of his life he should divide into three, etc.
On the Rambam’s reading, the word “always” is strained, and so is the Gemara’s question, “Does one know how long he will live?”, which implies that the division applies to one’s whole life.
ורי״ו בשם הרמ״ה כתב דלא אמרו זה אלא לדורות ראשונים כו׳ כמ״ש בב״י [בבית יוסף]. אמנם לפמ״ש [לפי מה שכתוב] א״ש [אתי שפיר] דבתחלת למודו של אדם ישלש השליש במקרא ממש לבדו.
And Rabbeinu Yerucham wrote in the name of the Ramah that this was said only for the early generations, etc., as is written in the Beis Yosef. However, according to what has been written [here], it is well resolved: at the beginning of a person’s learning he should devote the third to Scripture itself, alone;
Rabbeinu Yerucham, citing the Ramah (Rabbi Meir HaLevi Abulafia), as quoted in the Beis Yosef, limited the rule to earlier generations. The maamar’s approach resolves it simply: at the start of one’s learning, the third in Scripture means the plain text of Scripture alone.
דאע״ג [דאף על גב] שלתלמוד צריך זמן יותר מ״מ יש לו למהר ללמוד המקרא1 בתחלה ואחר שהגדיל בחכמה יש לו לקיים השליש במקרא בתשב״כ [בתורה שבכתב] עם מה שילמוד אח״כ מפנימיות התורה והאגדות2 שזה נכלל הכל בשליש במקרא כנ״ל,
for although Talmud requires more time, nevertheless he should hasten to learn Scripture first. And after he has grown in wisdom, he should fulfill the third in Scripture with the Written Torah together with what he will learn afterwards of the inner dimension of the Torah and the Aggados, for all of this is included in the third in Scripture, as mentioned above.
Although Talmud needs more time, one should first learn Scripture quickly. Later, once grown in wisdom, a person fulfils the third in Scripture with the Written Torah together with the inner Torah and the Aggados, all of which count as Scripture, as explained above.
(ואפשר דגם לימוד מדרש רבה ושאר המדרשים3 הוא בכלל השליש במקרא שהרי בפ״ק [בפרק קמא] דברכות דף י״א ע״ב משמע בהדיא בגמ׳ [בגמרא] ופרש״י [ופירש רש״י / ופירוש רש״י] דמדרש הוא קרוב למקרא כו׳ לפי שהם מדרשי מקראות.
(And it is possible that the study of Midrash Rabbah and the other Midrashim is also included in the third in Scripture; for in the first chapter of Berachos, folio 11b, it is explicitly implied in the Gemara and in Rashi’s commentary that Midrash is close to Scripture, etc., since they are interpretations of verses.
A parenthesis suggests that Midrash Rabbah and the other Midrashim also count as Scripture, since the Gemara in Berachos (11b), with Rashi, treats Midrash as close to Scripture, being interpretations of verses.
וכ״מ [וכן משמע] בנדרים דל״ו סע״ב [סוף עמוד ב] ואף שבהלכות ת״ת [תלמוד תורה] מבואר דמדרש תורה שהוא ספרא וספרי וכה״ג [וכהאי גוונא] הן בכלל שליש במשנה היינו מפני שהן הלכות וגופי התורה כמו המשנה משא״כ לימוד הרבות שהן אגדות שעל המקרא4 ומוסר ה׳ אפשר שזה נכלל בשליש במקרא.
And so it is implied in Nedarim, folio 36, at the end of side b. And although in the Laws of Torah Study it is explained that Midrash of the Torah, which is the Sifra and the Sifrei and the like, is included in the third in Mishnah, that is because they are laws and fundamentals of the Torah, like the Mishnah; whereas the study of the Rabbos, which are Aggados on Scripture and moral instruction of G‑d, it is possible that this is included in the third in Scripture.
Nedarim (36b) implies the same. The laws of Torah study do place the halachic Midrashim (Sifra, Sifrei) under Mishnah, but that is because they are laws; the Midrash Rabbah, which is Aggadah on verses and moral teaching, may belong with Scripture.
ולכן אתי שפיר דלעולם ישלש אדם5 כו׳. והנה ענין לעולם ישלש אדם מה שחלקו זה לשלישים י״ל [יש לומר] כדכתיב ולכבודי בראתיו6 יצרתיו אף עשיתיו. ואין כבוד אלא תורה.78
Therefore “a person should always divide into three,” etc., is well understood. Now, as for the matter of “a person should always divide into three,” why they divided this into thirds, it may be explained according to what is written, “For My glory I created him, I formed him, also I made him,” and “there is no glory but Torah.”
So “always” is right: the division holds for life. Why thirds? Because of the verse “For My glory I created him, I formed him, also I made him” (Isaiah 43:7), and “glory” means Torah (Avos 6:3): the three verbs correspond to three worlds.
והנה תלמוד בבריאה ומשנה ביצירה וכתיב יוצר אור ובורא חושך.9 ולכן ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] במחשכים הושיבני זה תלמוד בבלי. ומקרא בעשיה.10
Now, Talmud is in Beriah and Mishnah in Yetzirah; and it is written, “Who forms light and creates darkness.” Therefore our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “‘He has set me in dark places’: this is the Babylonian Talmud.” And Scripture is in Asiyah.
Talmud is in Beriah (“created”) and Mishnah in Yetzirah (“formed”), as in “Who forms light and creates darkness” (Isaiah 45:7); the Babylonian Talmud is called “dark places” (Sanhedrin 24a), matching “creates darkness.” Scripture is in Asiyah (“made”).
והנה אף עשיתיו אף הוא בחינ׳ [בחינת / בחינה] רבוי שמרבה בחינ׳ [בחינת / בחינה] רביעית כמ״ש בד״ה מי מנה11 עפר יעקב12 כו׳ ע״ש, לכן בכלל שליש במקרא נכלל בחינה הרביעית שהוא לימוד פנימיות התורה.
Now, [in] “also I made him,” [the word] “also” (af) is a term of inclusion, which includes a fourth level, as is written in the discourse beginning “Who has counted the dust of Yaakov,” etc.; see there. Therefore within the third in Scripture is included the fourth level, which is the study of the inner dimension (pnimiyus) of the Torah.
The word “also” (af) in “also I made him” adds something, a fourth level, as explained in the discourse “Who has counted the dust of Yaakov.” So within the third given to Scripture is included this fourth level, the study of the inner Torah. In that discourse (Likkutei Torah, Balak) the Alter Rebbe explains that af adds the highest level, the supernal Keser, and that it is joined to “made” because it is drawn down into action through keeping the mitzvos.
וזהו שארז״ל [שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] והביאו הרמב״ם [הרבי משה בן מימון] בפי׳ המשניות ספ״ה דאבות ע״פ אף חכמתי עמדה לי13 חכמתי שלמדתי באף עמדה לי14 כו׳).
And this is what our Sages, of blessed memory, said, and the Rambam brought it in his Commentary on the Mishnah, at the end of chapter 5 of Avos, on the verse “Also (af) my wisdom stood by me”: “The wisdom that I learned in af [anger] stood by me,” etc.)
The Midrash on “Also (af) my wisdom stood by me” (Ecclesiastes 2:9), cited by the Rambam at the end of his commentary on Avos chapter 5, reads it as “the wisdom I learned with af” (literally “in anger,” that is, with strain) “stood by me.” The same discourse in Balak explains that af, “anger,” is in itself not good, yet by refining it one draws down the highest level.
והנה מכ״ז [מכל זה] יובן בתוספת ביאור ענין ולא תשבית מלח15 כו׳ שלימוד הפנימית נק׳ בשם מלח שהמלח ממתקת הבשר. אף שאין בו טעם בעצמו כמו הבשר,
Now, from all this one will understand, with additional explanation, the matter of “And you shall not omit the salt,” etc.: that the study of the inner dimension is called by the name “salt,” for salt sweetens the meat, even though it has no taste in itself as the meat does.
Now the opening verse returns. The inner Torah is called “salt” because salt brings out the flavor of the meat, though it has no taste of its own the way meat does.
And so the revealed [part] of the Torah is likened to bread, as it is written, “Come, eat of my bread,”
The revealed Torah, by contrast, is likened to bread: “Come, eat of my bread” (Proverbs 9:5).
The paragraph resolves the difficulty in the division of study into thirds: Scripture’s third includes, later in life, the Aggados and the inner Torah. It then grounds the thirds in the verse “I created … formed … also made,” and begins to explain the salt of the opening verse as the inner Torah.
A Kehot note shows that the suggestion about Midrash Rabbah (parts 4–5) appears almost word for word in the Tzemach Tzedek’s Biurei HaZohar, which adds that the Gemara in Berachos has an opinion that the blessing over the Torah is needed for Scripture and Midrash but not for Mishnah and Gemara. Another note quotes the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah: Scripture is “in Asiyah” because, by its very greatness, it descends and is clothed down to the world of action; and on “the wisdom I learned with af,” that toil and labor bring the inner power out from concealment into revelation.
Marei mekomos
- 1בכלל לימוד המקרא . . לימוד האגדות · ראה הערת כ״ק אדמו״ר לעיל בהוספות יט, א.
- 2השליש במקרא . . מפנימי׳ התורה והאגדות · ראה לקו״ש חי״ח ע׳ 439.
- 3ואפשר דגם לימוד מדרש רבה ושאר המדרשים . . מדרשי המקראות · בביאה״ז להצ״צ-ב ע׳ תרכ ”צ״ע בה׳ ת״ת שהן בכלל משנה, אבל בפ״ק דברכות די״א ע״ב נלע״ד ראי׳ למה שכתבתי דמבואר שם מגמ׳ ופרש״י דמדרש קרוב למקרא לפי שהן מדרשי המקראות, ולכן יש מ״ד שם בגמ׳ דלמקרא ומדרש צריך לברך ברכת התורה ולא משנה וגמרא, אלא דהמסקנא צריך לברך על כולם, אבל עכ״פ מבואר דמדרש שייך למקרא וצ״ע בנדרים דל״ז ע״א גבי ומלמדו מדרש כו׳ ואכמ״ל” ע״ש.
- 4
- 5לעולם ישלש אדם · Avodah Zarah 19b:1–2
- 6ולכבודי בראתי · Isaiah 43:7
- 7ואין כבוד אלא תורה · Zohar III, 253b
- 8ואין כבוד אלא תורה · Pirkei Avot 6:3
- 9יוצר אור ובורא חושך · Isaiah 45:7
- 10ומקרא בעשי׳ · באוה״ת בראשית כרך-ו דף תתרל, ב מציין לכאן ומוסיף ”שמובן ענין פי׳ מקרא בעשיי׳ לפי שמקרא לרוב מעלתו יורד ומתלבש עד העשיי׳” ע״ש. וראה אוה״ת במדבר כרך-ו ע׳ א׳תקסב. ובליקוט פי׳ לתניא פרק מ.
- 11בד״ה מי מנה · בבי׳ פ״ג. [כ]. פ׳ בלק סט, ד. וראה לקו״ש-כ ע׳ 226.
- 12מי מנה עפר יעקב · Numbers 23:10
- 13אף חכמתי עמדה לי · Ecclesiastes 2:9
- 14חכמתי שלמדתי באף עמדה לי · Kohelet Rabbah 2:9
- 15ולא תשבית מלח · Leviticus 2:13
- 16לכו לחמו בלחמי · Proverbs 9:5
- 17בד״ה כי קרוב אליך הדבר · לקו״ת נצבים מו, א.
- 18ע״פ חסדי ה׳ כי לא תמנו · אגה״ק ס״י.
- 19בד״ה שובה ישראל · לקו״ת ש״ש סד, ד.
- 20סד״ה להבין ענין לחם משנה · תו״א סו, ד.
- 21בביאור ע״פ לריח שמניך · לקו״ת שה״ש ג, ג.
- 22שידיעת — רמה ונשאה · בתניא שלפנינו: רבה ונשאה. וכ״ה בהמשך מים רבים שם (רבה). אבל ראה לוח התיקון לתניא שצ״ל: רמה (וש״נ לסה״מ אתהלך לאזניא ע׳ קסה). וכ״ה בסה״מ תרל״ו ח״ב ע׳ תקיח. וראה בליקוט פי׳.
- 23וידעת היום · Deuteronomy 4:39
- 24דע את אלקי אביך · דברי הימים-א כח, ט.
- 25ויצונו ה׳ לעשות · Deuteronomy 6:24
- 26שהתורה נק׳ תרעא לדרתא · Shabbat 31b:1
- 27והיינו לגבי יר״ע וכמ״ש בסש״ב · ראה סה״מ תרל״ו ח״ב ע׳ שו.
- 28ועפ״ז יתורץ מה שנדחקו · מכאן עד להלן ה, ד שו״ה ביאור ליתא במים רבים שם.
- 29אמרז״ל במחשכים . . זה תלמוד בבלי · Sanhedrin 24a:18–19
- 30וזהו שאמרז״ל · בקה״ר ב, ט. [כ].
- 31
30וגם לבשר כמ״ש במ״א ע״פ זאת הפעם עצם מעצמי ובשר מבשרי.1 דקאי על תשבע״פ [תורה שבעל פה]. וכן בגמ׳ [בגמרא] ב״ב [בבא בתרא] דכ״ב אמרו אכלו בישרא שמינא בי רבא2.
and also to meat, as is written elsewhere on the verse “This time, bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh,” which refers to the Oral Torah. And so too in the Gemara, Bava Basra, folio 22, they said, “Eat fat meat at Rava’s house.”
The revealed Torah is also likened to meat. Elsewhere “bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh” (Genesis 2:23) is explained as the Oral Torah, and the Talmud (Bava Basra 22a) calls the Torah learned at Rava’s house “fat meat.”
והיינו כמו הלחם והבשר יש בהן טעם וממש כך בלימוד הנגלה שבתורה יש בה השגת המהות ממש
That is: just as bread and meat have taste and substance, so in the study of the revealed [part] of the Torah there is an actual grasp of the essence;
Bread and meat have taste and substance; so in the revealed Torah the mind truly grasps the essence of the wisdom.
משא״כ בלימוד הפנימי׳ [הפנימיות / הפנימית] שאין בזה רק ידיעת המציאות ולא השגת המהות והמהות נסתר ונעלם ואינו מושג כלל להיות בבחי׳ טעם ממש כמו הנגלה עד לע״ל [לעתיד לבוא] שיתגלה פנימית התורה.3
whereas in the study of the inner dimension (pnimiyus) there is in this only knowledge of the existence, and not a grasp of the essence. The essence is hidden and concealed and is not grasped at all, so as to be in the manner of actual taste like the revealed [part], until the Time to Come, when the inner dimension of the Torah will be revealed.
In the inner Torah it is otherwise: there one has only knowledge that things exist, not a grasp of what they are, so it has no “taste” of its own, like salt. That essence will remain hidden until the Time to Come, when the inner Torah will be revealed; Rashi on Song of Songs 1:2, which the Kehot note gives, speaks of the hope that G‑d will appear again to explain the secret of the Torah’s reasons and its hidden treasures.
Bread and meat, which have taste and substance, are the revealed Torah, whose essence is grasped; salt, which has no taste of its own but brings out the taste of the meat, is the inner Torah, whose essence will be tasted only in the future.
Marei mekomos
- 1זאת הפעם עצם מעצמי ובשר מבשרי · Genesis 2:23
- 2
- 3לע״ל שיתגלה פנימית התורה · ראה רש״י שה״ש א, ב.
Salt, fear of sin and the covenant ¶31–39
31ולכן נמשל למלח לומר שעם היות שאין בו טעם עכ״ז [עם כל זה] הוא דייקא הנותן טעם בהבשר.
Therefore it is likened to salt, to say that although it has no taste, nevertheless it is precisely what gives taste to the meat.
Salt has no taste of its own, yet it is what gives meat its taste. So too the inner Torah, whose essence is not grasped, gives “taste” to the revealed Torah.
וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] רז״ל [רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] באדר״ן [באבות דרבי נתן] ס״פ כ״ט וכ״ה ג״כ ברבות כל מי שיש בידו מדרש ואין בידו הלכות לא טעם טעם של חכמה כל מי שיש בידו הלכות ואין בידו מדרש לא טעם טעם של יראת חטא,
And this is what our Sages, of blessed memory, said in Avos deRabbi Nasan, at the end of chapter 29 (and so it is also in the Rabbos): “Whoever has Midrash in hand but does not have laws in hand has not tasted the taste of wisdom; whoever has laws in hand but does not have Midrash in hand has not tasted the taste of fear of sin.”
The Sages’ saying in Avos deRabbi Nasan (also in the Midrash Rabbah) supports this. It sets “Midrash” (here, the inner Torah) beside “laws” (the revealed Torah): one who has only Midrash has not tasted the taste of wisdom, and one who has only laws has not tasted the taste of fear of sin.
פי׳ שהלכות נק׳ טעם של חכמה לפי שבהן ועל ידן מושג המהות חכמתו ית׳ שנתלבשה בהלכה זו
The meaning is that the laws are called “the taste of wisdom” because in them and through them the essence of His wisdom, may He be blessed, that has been enclothed in this law is grasped;
The laws are called “the taste of wisdom” because in them, and through them, the very essence of G‑d’s wisdom clothed in the law is grasped.
משא״כ בלימוד הפנימיות הנק׳ מדרש אין מושג המהות ממש ולכן נק׳ שלא טעם טעם של חכמה פי׳ המהות ממש.
whereas in the study of the inner dimension (pnimiyus), which is called Midrash, the actual essence is not grasped. Therefore [of such a one] it is said that he “has not tasted the taste of wisdom,” meaning the actual essence.
In the inner Torah, called “Midrash,” the essence is not grasped, so it is said of one who has only Midrash that he “has not tasted the taste of wisdom,” its actual essence.
The image of salt, which has no taste but gives taste, is explained through the Sages’ contrast of “Midrash” and “laws”: the laws give the taste of wisdom, because in them the essence of G‑d’s wisdom is grasped.
32ועכ״ז [ועם כל זה] מי שיש בידו הלכות ואין בידו מדרש לא טעם טעם של יראת חטא
And nevertheless, one who has laws but does not have Midrash “has not tasted the taste of fear of sin.”
Yet one who has laws without Midrash lacks the taste of fear of sin.
כי אף שבלימוד המדרש אין מושג רק הארה מ״מ זו ההארה מביאה לידי יראת חטא ועמ״ש מענין פי׳ יראת חטא סד״ה וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות.12
For although in the study of Midrash only a radiance is grasped, nevertheless this radiance brings one to fear of sin. And see what is written on the meaning of fear of sin at the end of the discourse beginning “And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes.”
For in Midrash, the inner Torah, the learner grasps only a radiance, not the essence, yet that radiance brings him to fear of sin. The discourse “And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes” (Likkutei Torah, Matos) ends with the Sages’ sequence: holiness brings to humility, and humility brings to fear of sin.
The inner Torah, though it gives only a glimpse, brings to fear of sin, which the revealed Torah alone does not.
Marei mekomos
- 1סד״ה וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות · לקו״ת מטות פא, ד.
- 2וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות · Numbers 30:2
33ועוד כי אף שזהו רק הארה הנה היא הארה מבחי׳ הפנימיות כי אורייתא סתים וגליא,
Moreover, although this is only a radiance, it is a radiance from the level of the inner dimension (pnimiyus), for the Torah is hidden and revealed.
Moreover, though Midrash gives only a radiance, it is a radiance of the Torah’s inner, hidden side; the Torah has both a hidden and a revealed side.
והנה ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] חכם עדיף מנביא1 אף שהנביא משיג המהות ממש בבחי׳ ראייה משא״כ החכם אינו משיג המהות כ״א ידיעת המציאות.
Now our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “A sage is greater than a prophet,” although the prophet grasps the actual essence, in the manner of sight, whereas the sage does not grasp the essence, but only knowledge of the existence,
A parallel: the Sages said “a sage is greater than a prophet,” though the prophet sees the essence of what he perceives, as with the eyes, while the sage knows only that it exists.
A radiance from the hidden side of the Torah can be worth more than the essence of its revealed side, just as the sage, who only knows, surpasses the prophet, who sees.
Marei mekomos
- 1ארז״ל חכם עדיף מנביא · Bava Batra 12a:14–15
34וכמ״ש באג״ה [באגרת הקודש] בד״ה עוטה אור כשלמה.12 אעפ״כ [אף על פי כן] חכם עדיף מנביא לפי שמשיג תעלומות חכמה3 מה שלא ניתנו להתגלות בנבואה.
as is written in Iggeres HaKodesh, in the discourse beginning “Wrapped in light as a garment.” Nevertheless, a sage is greater than a prophet, because he grasps “the hidden things of wisdom,” which were not given to be revealed in prophecy.
Iggeres HaKodesh, in the letter on “Wrapped in light as a garment” (section 19), explains it: the sage is greater because he grasps “the hidden things of wisdom,” which cannot be revealed in prophecy.
א״כ אף ההארה מבחי׳ עליונה יש בה מעלה יתירה מהמהות שבבחי׳ שלמטה, וכה״ג [וכהאי גוונא] נתבאר בענין מצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] ומ״ע [ומצות עשה] סד״ה חייב אינש לבסומי בפוריא.45
If so, even a radiance from a higher level has a greater virtue than the essence that is in a lower level. Something similar is explained concerning the prohibitions and the positive commandments, at the end of the discourse beginning “A person is obligated to become intoxicated on Purim”:
So even a mere radiance of a higher level outweighs the essence of a lower one. The Purim discourse “A person is obligated to become intoxicated” makes a similar point about prohibitions and positive commandments.
The principle is stated: a radiance of a higher level surpasses the essence of a lower one. This is why the inner Torah, grasped only in glimpses, is so valuable.
In the Purim discourse, the prohibitions correspond to the first letters of the Name, yud and hei, and the positive commandments to the last, vav and hei; the “intoxication” of Purim, a nullification of comprehension, reaches the higher teshuvah that rises above both.
Marei mekomos
- 1עוטה אור כשלמה · Psalms 104:2
- 2עוטה אור כשלמה · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 19:1
- 3תעלומות חכמה · Job 11:6
- 4סד״ה חייב איניש לבסומי בפוריא · תו״א צה, ד.
- 5חייב אינש לבסומי בפוריא · Megillah 7b:7–8
35וגדול כח גילוי כו׳ ע״ש
“And great is the power of revelation,” etc.; see there.
The Purim discourse continues, “And great is the power of revelation”; see there.
וכענין ברכה והודאה שאף שההודאה אין בה השגת המהות אעפ״כ [אף על פי כן] היינו לפי שהיא בבחינה דלית מחשבה תפיסא ביה12 כמ״ש במ״א בביאור ע״פ אתה הצבת כל גבולות ארץ34 ובד״ה אלה פקודי המשכן,56
And [it is] like the matter of blessing and acknowledgment (hoda’ah): although in acknowledgment there is no grasp of the essence, nevertheless [it is higher]; that is, because it is on the level of which [it is said], “no thought can grasp Him,” as is written elsewhere, in the explanation on the verse “You have set all the borders of the earth,” and in the discourse beginning “These are the accounts of the Mishkan.”
Another parallel: acknowledgment (hoda’ah, as in “Modim”) involves no grasp of G‑d’s essence, yet it is higher than blessing, because it reaches the level where “no thought can grasp Him” (Tikkunei Zohar). So it is explained in the explanation of “You have set all the borders of the earth,” printed in the Siddur, and in the discourse “These are the accounts of the Mishkan” (Likkutei Torah, Pekudei), where blessing is the drawing-down into revelation and acknowledgment is the bowing before what is above grasp.
גם ע״ד שארז״ל [שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] אבידת אביו ואבידת רבו7 של רבו קודמת אף שמהאב נמשך בו המהות ממש שהטפה היא מהמוח מהעצמיות ממש ומהרב אין נמשך בו מהות ועצמיות ממש רק הארת השכל המלובש בהדבור כו׳,
Also along the lines of what our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “[If] his father’s lost object and his teacher’s lost object [are before him], his teacher’s takes precedence”; although from the father the actual essence is drawn into him, since the drop is from the brain, from the actual very being, while from the teacher there is not drawn into him the actual essence and very being, but only a radiance of the intellect enclothed in speech, etc.
A further parallel comes from a law of lost objects: if a person finds both his father’s and his teacher’s lost objects, his teacher’s comes first. Yet from his father he received his very essence, since the seed comes from the father’s brain, while from his teacher he received no essence, only the light of intellect clothed in speech.
אעפ״כ [אף על פי כן] זו ההארה שהיא התורה גבוה מעצמיות החכמה שבנפש כמ״ש בתניא ח״א [חלק א׳] פ״ה.
Nevertheless, this radiance, which is the Torah, is higher than the very being of the wisdom in the soul, as is written in Tanya, Part I, chapter 5.
Even so, that light, the Torah, stands higher than the essence of the wisdom in the soul, as Tanya, chapter 5, explains.
Two more examples of the principle: acknowledgment, which does not grasp, reaches higher than blessing; and the teacher, who gives only a radiance of Torah, takes precedence over the father, who gives one’s very essence.
Marei mekomos
- 1דלית מחשבה תפיסא בי׳ · ת״ז בהקדמה.
- 2דלית מחשבה תפיסא ביה · Tikkunei Zohar 17a:10–12
- 3בביאור ע״פ אתה הצבת כל גבולות ארץ · סידור שה, ד. אוה״ת נ״ך ב ע׳ תתקנט.
- 4אתה הצבת כל גבולות ארץ · Psalms 74:17
- 5ובד״ה אלה פקודי המשכן · לעיל לקו״ת פקודי ג, א ואילך.
- 6אלה פקודי המשכן · Exodus 38:21
- 7אבידת אביו ואבידת רבו · Bava Metzia 33a:8–9
36ובמסכת סופרים פט״ו [פרק ט״ו / פרשה ט״ו] ה״ח [ה׳ חסדים] הובא בספר ערכי הכינויים מבואר דהמקרא נמשל למלח. וא״ש [ואתי שפיר] ג״כ ע״פ מה שנת׳ [שנתבאר] לעיל,
And in Tractate Soferim, chapter 15, halachah 8, cited in the book Erchei HaKinuyim, it is explained that Scripture is likened to salt. This too is well understood according to what was explained above.
Tractate Soferim, quoted in Erchei HaKinuyim, likens the Torah of Scripture to salt (the Mishnah to pepper and the Talmud to spices). This fits what was explained above: Scripture, like the inner Torah, is not grasped in its essence yet gives the rest its taste.
ולכן נק׳ המלח ג״כ ברית אלקיך1 פי׳ ע״ד מ״ש לעברך בברית2 ה׳ אלקיך שהוא בחי׳ התקשרות ואהבה רבה ונפלאה למעלה מהשכל וכמו כריתת ברית,
Therefore the salt is also called “the covenant of your G‑d.” The meaning is along the lines of what is written, “that you may enter into the covenant of Havayah your G‑d,” which is the level of a bond and of a great and wondrous love above intellect, like the making of a covenant.
That is why the salt is called “the covenant of your G‑d” (Leviticus 2:13). A covenant, as in “that you may enter into the covenant of Havayah your G‑d” (Deuteronomy 29:11), is a bond of great and wondrous love above reason, like the covenant two friends make so that their love will last beyond any reason.
ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה אתם נצבים34 ובד״ה מקושש עצים,56 והמשכת אהבה רבה זו בנפש נמשך ע״י עסק התורה וכמש״ל [וכמה שכתוב לעיל] שע״י עסק התורה מתקשרת באור א״ס ב״ה הסוכ״ע.
And see what is written about this in the discourse beginning “You are standing” and in the discourse beginning “Gathering wood.” And the drawing of this great love into the soul comes through occupation with Torah, as is written above, that through occupation with Torah [the soul] is bound with the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin).
In Likkutei Torah, Nitzavim, on “You are standing,” the Alter Rebbe explains that two friends make a covenant so that their love will never cease, even where reason would end it, as though they had become one flesh. That great love is drawn into the soul through Torah study, which binds the soul to the encompassing Infinite Light.
ועפ״ז [ועל פי זה] יש לפרש מארז״ל [מאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] פ״ב [פרק ב׳] דחגיגה די״ב ע״ב ע״פ הקוטפים מלוח עלי שיח789 (באיוב סי׳ למ״ד) שפוסקים מד״ת [מדברי תורה] ועוסקים בדברי שיחה
According to this one may interpret the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, in chapter 2 of Chagigah, folio 12b, on the verse “Who pluck saltwort (maluach) by the bushes (alei siach)” (in Job, chapter 30): “those who interrupt words of Torah and engage in words of idle talk (sichah).”
This explains the Talmud’s reading (Chagigah 12b) of “Who pluck saltwort (maluach) by the bushes (alei siach)” (Job 30:4): those who break off from words of Torah for idle talk (sichah). In Job the words describe outcasts who, in hunger, gather a salty desert plant among the bushes; the Talmud reads maluach, “salty,” as words of Torah, and siach, “bush,” as sichah, “talk.”
הרי שד״ת [שדברי תורה] נק׳ מלוח,ועמ״ש בזה רש״י [רבי שלמה יצחקי] פ״ק [פרק קמא] דע״ז [דעבודה זרה] ד״ג ע״ב, ולפי מש״כ [מה שכתוב] י״ל [יש לומר] כפשוטו.
Thus words of Torah are called “salty” (maluach). And see what Rashi wrote on this in the first chapter of Avodah Zarah, folio 3b; and according to what has been written [here], it can be explained according to its plain sense.
So words of Torah are called “salty.” Rashi on Avodah Zarah 3b comments on this; according to the maamar it can be taken in its plain sense: Torah is salt.
וזהו ג״כ ענין מארז״ל [מאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] פ״ב [פרק ב׳] דשבת דל״א סע״א [סוף עמוד א] קבעת עתים לתורה10 כו׳ פלפלת בחכמה כו׳ ואפילו הכי אי יראת ה׳ היא אוצרו11 אין אי לא לא.
And this is also the matter of the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, in chapter 2 of Shabbos, folio 31, at the end of side a: “Did you set times for Torah?” etc. “Did you engage in the dialectics of wisdom?” etc. “And even so, if ‘the fear of Havayah is his treasure,’ yes; if not, no.
The same idea is in the Talmud’s account of judgment after death (Shabbos 31a): a person is asked whether he set times for Torah and engaged in its analysis, but all this counts only if “the fear of Havayah is his treasure” (Isaiah 33:6).
משל לאדם שאמר לשלוחו העלה לי כור חיטין לעלייה הלך והעלה לו אמר ליה עירבת לי בהן קב חומטין אמר ליה לאו,א״ל [אמר ליה] מוטב שלא העליתה.1213
It is like a man who said to his agent, ‘Bring up for me a kor of wheat to the upper storey.’ He went and brought it up for him. He said to him, ‘Did you mix in for me a kav of chumtin?’ He said to him, ‘No.’ He said to him, ‘It would have been better had you not brought it up.’”
The parable: a man’s agent brought up a kor of wheat but did not mix in a kav of chumtin (which Rashi explains as salty earth); the owner said it would have been better not to bring it up at all.
Salt as “the covenant of your G‑d” is the love above reason that Torah study brings; and the Talmud’s images of “salty” words of Torah and of wheat that needs chumtin show that Torah needs this salt, the fear of G‑d.
Marei mekomos
- 1ברית אלקיך · Leviticus 2:13
- 2לעברך בברית ה׳ אלקיך · Deuteronomy 29:11
- 3בד״ה אתם נצבים · לקו״ת נצבים מד, ב.
- 4אתם נצבים · Deuteronomy 29:9
- 5ובד״ה מקושש עצים · לקו״ת שלח מב, ג.
- 6מקושש עצים · Numbers 15:32
- 7
- 8הקוטפים מלוח עלי שיח · Avodah Zarah 3b:14
- 9הקוטפים מלוח עלי שיח · Job 30:4
- 10קבעת עתים לתורה · Shabbat 31a:11
- 11יראת ה׳ היא אוצרו · Isaiah 33:6
- 12
- 13
37והענין כי חטה הוא כ״ב אתוון1 דאורייתא. ולכן מ״ת [מתן תורה] בשבועות בכורי קציר חטים.2 וכמ״ש במ״א באריכות בד״ה וספרתם לכם34 כו׳ ע״ש.
The explanation is that “wheat” (chitah) is the twenty-two letters of the Torah. Therefore the Giving of the Torah was on Shavuos, “the first fruits of the wheat harvest,” as is written elsewhere at length in the discourse beginning “And you shall count for yourselves,” etc.; see there.
Wheat (chitah, חטה) has the numerical value 22, the number of letters of the Torah. That is why the Torah was given on Shavuos, the festival of “the first fruits of the wheat harvest,” as the discourse on “And you shall count for yourselves” explains.
וקב חומטין פרש״י [פירש רש״י / פירוש רש״י] ארץ מלחה, והוא ענין ולא תשבית מלח כו׳ וזהו שנזכר עירבת לי בהן קב חומטין דתיבת לי מיותר.
And “a kav of chumtin” Rashi explains as salty earth; this is the matter of “And you shall not omit the salt,” etc. And this is why it mentions “Did you mix in for me a kav of chumtin”: for the word “for me” is superfluous.
Rashi explains chumtin as salty earth, which is the salt of “And you shall not omit the salt.” The parable’s words “Did you mix in for me” contain a superfluous “for me.”
אלא דר״ל [דרוצה לומר] שע״י שיראת ה׳ היא אוצרו אזי התורה והחטים הם לי ונק׳ תורת5 ה׳ וכמ״ש והייתם לי6 כו׳ כי לי בנ״י [בני ישראל]7 כו׳ משא״כ תורה בלא יראה כו׳:
Rather, it means that through “the fear of Havayah [being] his treasure,” the Torah and the wheat are then “for Me,” and it is called “the Torah of Havayah,” as it is written, “And you shall be Mine,” etc., “For the children of Israel are Mine,” etc.; whereas Torah without awe, etc.
Its point is that when the fear of Havayah is a person’s treasure, his Torah and “wheat” are “for Me,” for G‑d, and are called “the Torah of Havayah,” as in “you shall be Mine” and “the children of Israel are Mine.” Torah without awe is not.
The parable is decoded: the wheat is the Torah, the chumtin is salt, the fear of G‑d, and only with it is the Torah truly G‑d’s.
A parallel passage in Likkutei Torah (Sh’lach) adds that, according to the Arizal, salt is three sweetened Gevuros; that מלח has the letters of לחם, “bread,” and the numerical value of מזלא; and that its root is in the Gevuros of Abba, which is why it draws blood and impurity out of meat, “for through Chochmah they are refined.”
Marei mekomos
- 1חטה הוא כ״ב אתוון · Zohar III, 188b
- 2בכורי קציר חטים · Exodus 34:22
- 3בד״ה וספרתם לכם · לקו״ת במדבר יא, ג. וראה לקמן פ׳ שלח מו, ג.
- 4וספרתם לכם · Leviticus 23:15
- 5תורת ה׳ · Psalms 1:2
- 6והייתם לי · Exodus 19:5
- 7כי לי בנ״י · Leviticus 25:55
38ו והנה פי׳ וכל קרבן מנחתך במלח תמלח1 קאי על המנחה ואח״כ על כל קרבנך תקריב מלח היינו בכל הקרבנות כולם.
6. Now, “And every offering of your meal-offering you shall season with salt” refers to the meal-offering; and afterwards, “On all your offerings you shall offer salt,” that is, with all the offerings altogether.
Section 6 returns to the verse. Its first clause, “every offering of your meal-offering you shall season with salt,” speaks of the meal-offering; the last, “on all your offerings you shall offer salt,” of all the offerings.
כי הנה המנחה שהיא סולת ושמן זהו ענין עסק התורה חטה כ״ב אתוון דאורייתא וצריכה מלח כנ״ל,
For the meal-offering, which is fine flour and oil, is the matter of occupation with Torah, “wheat,” the twenty-two letters of the Torah, and it needs salt, as mentioned above.
The meal-offering, of fine flour and oil, stands for Torah study, since wheat is the twenty-two letters of the Torah, and like Torah it needs salt.
And this is “Bread with salt you shall eat”: “bread” is the study of the revealed [parts], Mishnah and Talmud; “with salt you shall eat” is Scripture and Aggados, etc., as mentioned above.
This is the Mishnah’s “Bread with salt you shall eat” (Avos 6:4): bread is the revealed Torah, Mishnah and Talmud, and salt is Scripture and the Aggados, as explained above.
ואמר אח״כ ומים במשורה תשתה כי המלח גורם הצמאון היינו להיות צמאה לך נפשי4 שהוא הפלגת האהבה בבחי׳ כלתה נפשי.56
And afterwards it says, “and water by measure you shall drink”; for salt causes thirst, that is, to be [in the state of] “My soul thirsts for You,” which is the intensity of love in the manner of “my soul pines.”
Then comes “and water by measure you shall drink”: salt makes one thirsty, like the soul that “thirsts for You” (Psalms 63:2), an intense love in which the soul “pines” (Psalms 84:3).
The meal-offering with salt is Torah study with its inner dimension, and the salt’s thirst is the soul’s intense love for G‑d, which must be balanced by the “water” that follows.
Marei mekomos
- 1וכל קרבן מנחתך במלח תמלח · Leviticus 2:13
- 2פת במלח תאכל · אבות ו, ד.
- 3פת במלח תאכל · Pirkei Avot 6:4
- 4צמאה לך נפשי · Psalms 63:2
- 5כלתה נפשי · שם פד, ג.
- 6כלתה נפשי · Psalms 84:3
39והעצה לזה הוא בחי׳ מים שהם המרוים הצמאון והוא ענין אם רץ לבך שוב123 לאחור [לאחד בכי״ק [בכתב יד קדשו]]4
And the remedy for this is the level of water, which quenches the thirst; this is the matter of “If your heart runs, return backward” [in his holy handwriting: “to the One”].
The remedy for that thirst is “water,” which quenches it. This is the teaching “If your heart runs, return”: the soul’s yearning must be followed by a return. Sefer Yetzirah reads “return to the place”; the bracket gives the reading of the Tzemach Tzedek’s manuscript, “return to the One.”
והקרבנות שהם בשר העולה הוא ענין בירור והעלאת נפש הבהמית וכמ״ש בד״ה צו את בנ״י [בני ישראל] ואמרת אליהם5 את קרבני לחמי6 מענין עצמות גידין ובשר של קרבן העולה שהבשר שרשו מן הדם שבלב והוא ענין המדות שבנפש הבהמית
And the offerings, which are the meat of the burnt-offering, are the matter of the refinement and elevation of the animal soul, as is written in the discourse beginning “Command the children of Israel and say to them: My offering, My bread,” on the matter of the bones, sinews and flesh of the burnt-offering: that the flesh has its root in the blood that is in the heart, and this is the matter of the emotive attributes (middos) of the animal soul,
The offerings, the meat of the burnt-offering, stand for refining and elevating the animal soul. In the discourse on “My offering, My bread” (Likkutei Torah, Pinchas), the bones, sinews and flesh of the burnt-offering are explained, the flesh coming from the blood of the heart, which is the emotions of the animal soul; there the Alter Rebbe adds that the animal soul of the offering rises to its root in the “face of the ox” of the Chariot and from there to be included in the Infinite Light.
וצריך להפכן מן הקצה אל הקצה כו׳, וע״כ צריך לזה מלח דוקא שהוא מגבורות דאבא ובחכמה אתברירו.7
and one must transform them from one extreme to the other, etc. Therefore for this salt is needed specifically, for it is from the Gevuros (severities) of Abba, and “through Chochmah they are refined.”
Those emotions must be turned around completely. For that, salt is needed, since salt comes from the Gevuros (severities) of Abba, Chochmah, and “through Chochmah they are refined” (the Kehot note points to the Zohar, II, 154b). The preceding maamar (Likkutei Torah, Vayikra 4a) explains this refining by the image of rennet, which separates cheese from whey without its own taste remaining in either.
Water answers the thirst of love by bringing the soul back to its task below, and salt, rooted in Chochmah, is needed for all the offerings because it refines the emotions of the animal soul.
The preceding maamar also explains that meat is sweetened by salt because the Chasadim of Imma came into being from the Gevuros of Abba.
Marei mekomos
- 1אם רץ לבך שוב · ת״ז בהק׳ (ז, א). ושם אי׳ בהמוקפים (כ״א לאחד). [כ]. בס״י פ״א הגי׳ ”למקום”.
- 2אם רץ לבך שוב · Tikkunei Zohar 7a:3
- 3אם רץ לבך שוב · Sefer Yetzirah 1:8
- 4לאחד בכי״ק · ניתוסף בהוצאת ווילנא תרס״ד. והכוונה לבוך גוכי״ק הצ״צ מלקו״ת מהדו״ק והוא בוך 1101-2.
- 5בד״ה צו את בנ״י ואמרת אליהם · לקו״ת פנחס עז, ד.
- 6צו את בנ״י ואמרת אליהם את קרבני לחמי · Numbers 28:2
- 7ובחכמה אתברירו · Zohar II, 154b
Salt that destroys and preserves ¶40–48
40ולכן ע״ה [עם הארץ] אסור לאכול בשר1 וכמ״ש מזה בד״ה בהעלותך את הנרות23 ופרש״י [ופירש רש״י / ופירוש רש״י] כשראה אהרן4 כו׳ יעו״ש [יעויין שם].
Therefore an unlearned person is forbidden to eat meat, as is written about this in the discourse beginning “When you raise up the lamps,” and [on] Rashi’s explanation, “When Aharon saw,” etc.; see there.
Because refining the animal soul needs the “salt” of Torah, the Talmud says an unlearned person may not eat meat: he cannot elevate it. The text refers to the discourse on “When you raise up the lamps” and Rashi’s comment there that Aharon was distressed when he saw the princes’ offerings.
ופי׳ גבורות דאבא הוא ע״ד לעולם ירגיז אדם5 יצ״ט [יצר טוב] על יצה״ר [יצר הרע] ועמ״ש ע״פ וגם אתה תדין את ביתי6 כו׳
And the meaning of “the Gevuros of Abba” is along the lines of “A person should always incite his good inclination against his evil inclination.” And see what is written on the verse “And you too shall judge My house,” etc.
The “Gevuros of Abba,” the severities rooted in Chochmah, are explained by the Talmud’s advice that a person should always rouse his good inclination against his evil one: a holy force that wages war on evil. The text also refers to its discourse on “And you too shall judge My house” (Zechariah 3:7).
וזהו שארז״ל [שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] פ״ג [פרק ג׳] דמנחות דכ״א ע״א ע״פ במלח תמלח יכול תבונהו ופרש״י [ופירש רש״י / ופירוש רש״י] יכול יתן בו טעם כבינה7 המתקנת את האדם כו׳.
And this is what our Sages, of blessed memory, said in chapter 3 of Menachos, folio 21a, on the verse “With salt you shall season [it]”: “One might think, tevunehu,” and Rashi explains, “One might think that he should give it taste like understanding (binah), which perfects a person,” etc.
The Talmud (Menachos 21a) asks of the words “with salt you shall season” whether one might “tevunehu,” a word built on the root of binah, “understanding.” Rav Ashi explains: might one give it taste as binah does? The maamar quotes Rashi: like the binah that perfects a person. The verse answers, “you shall season.”
The salt’s root in the Gevuros of Abba is explained as the holy severity of Chochmah that fights the evil inclination, and the Talmud’s question about salting the offering is introduced.
The discourse on “When you raise up the lamps” explains that an unlearned person may not eat meat because he cannot elevate it, which shows that a person raises up the food he eats; the princes each raised up their tribe through their offerings.
Marei mekomos
- 1ע״ה אסור לאכול בשר · Pesachim 49b:3
- 2בד״ה בהעלותך את הנרות · לקו״ת בהעלותך לא, ג.
- 3בהעלותך את הנרות · Numbers 8:2
- 4כשראה אהרן · Rashi on Numbers 8:2
- 5לעולם ירגיז אדם · Berakhot 5a:2
- 6וגם אתה תדין את ביתי · Zechariah 3:7
- 7
41ולכאורה אינו מובן. אלא הענין כי בינה המתקנת את האדם קאי על נפש האלקית כי בינה היינו בן1 י״ה וכמ״ש ע״פ וכל בניך למודי הוי׳ וע״ז נאמר יסובבנהו יבוננהו.2
Seemingly this is not understood. Rather, the point is that “understanding, which perfects a person,” refers to the G‑dly soul; for Binah is ben Yah (son of Yah), as is written on the verse “And all your children shall be taught of Havayah”; and of this it is said, “He encompassed him, He gave him understanding (yevonenehu).”
The Talmud’s question is puzzling, so it is interpreted: “binah that perfects a person” refers to the G‑dly soul. Binah is read as ben Yah, “son of Yah” (as in the discourse on “all your children shall be taught of Havayah”), and the verse says of Israel, “He encompassed him, He gave him understanding” (Deuteronomy 32:10).
וע״ז אמרו יכול שאין קרבן נה״ב [נפש הבהמית] עולה לרצון אא״כ [אלא אם כן] תתהפך למעלת ומדרגת הביטול דנפש האלקית ממש,
And of this they said, “One might think”: [one might think] that the offering of the animal soul does not rise with favor unless it is transformed into the actual virtue and rank of the nullification (bittul) of the G‑dly soul.
So the question “might one think” means: might the animal soul’s offering be acceptable only if it reaches the full self-nullification of the G‑dly soul?
ובאמת זהו דבר הקשה כי הנה״א [הנפש האלקית] היא חלק אלוה ממעל3 שנלקחה מפנימיות העולמות וע״כ יש בה בחי׳ הביטול האמיתי בטבעה להשתפך בחיק אביה אור א״ס ב״ה
And in truth this is a difficult thing, for the G‑dly soul is “a part of G‑d above,” which was taken from the inner dimension (pnimiyus) of the worlds, and therefore it has the level of true nullification in its nature, to pour itself out into the bosom of its Father, the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He;
That would be very hard, for the G‑dly soul is “a part of G‑d above,” taken from the inner dimension of the worlds, so true self-nullification is natural to it: by nature it longs to pour itself out into the bosom of its Father, the Infinite Light.
משא״כ בנה״ב [בנפש הבהמית] שלוקחה מק״נ [מקליפת נוגה] כו׳ וכמשנ״ת [וכמו שנתבאר] בד״ה אדם כי יקריב מכם4 מן הבהמה כו׳
which is not so with the animal soul, which was taken from kelipas nogah, etc., as was explained in the discourse beginning “A man, when he brings near of you [an offering] from the animals,” etc.
The animal soul, though, comes from kelipas nogah, the “glowing husk” in which good and evil are mixed, as the first discourse of this parsha, “A man, when he brings near of you,” explains: every Jew has two souls, the G‑dly soul rooted in “Adam” and the animal soul rooted in the “face of the ox.”
וזהו ת״ל [תלמוד לומר] תמלח. שעכ״פ [שעל כל פנים] תוכל לבוא גם היא לבחינת ביטול היש כו׳. וזהו ענין ההפרש בין למסור נפשו באחד ובין בחינת בכל נפשך כו׳ כמש״ש [כמה שכתוב שם].
And this is [why] “the verse teaches: you shall season”: that at any rate it too can come to the level of the nullification of the “something” (yesh), etc. And this is the matter of the difference between giving over one’s soul in “One” and the level of “with all your soul,” etc., as is written there.
So the verse answers, “you shall season,” with salt: the animal soul too can at least reach a measure of self-nullification. It is the same distinction as between giving one’s soul at “One” and “with all your soul,” explained above.
The Talmud’s “might one think … like binah” is read as asking whether the animal soul must reach the G‑dly soul’s self-nullification; the answer “you shall season” means that, through salt, it can reach its own measure of it.
The discourse “A man, when he brings near of you,” the first in this parsha, explains that every Jew has two souls: the G‑dly soul, rooted in the “Adam” of the Chariot, and the animal soul, taken from the dregs of the ofanim and rooted in the “face of the ox”; the soul descends in order to refine the animal soul.
Marei mekomos
- 1בינה . . בן י״ה · Zohar III, 122a
- 2יסובבנהו יבוננהו · Deuteronomy 32:10
- 3חלק אלוה ממעל · Job 31:2
- 4בד״ה אדם כי יקריב מכם · לעיל ב, ב.
42והנה הרמב״ן [הרבי משה בן נחמן] בפי׳ החומש1 כאן כתב שהמלח הוא מים ובכח השמש הבא בהם יעשה מלח2 כו׳ והמים והאש באים בה כו׳
Now, the Ramban, in his commentary on the Chumash here, wrote that salt is water, and by the power of the sun that comes into it, it becomes salt, etc.; and the water and the fire come into it, etc.,
The Ramban, on this verse, explains that salt is water that has become salt through the heat of the sun, so both water and fire are in it.
ולכן תקיים הדבר וגם תכרית כמ״ש גפרית ומלח שרפה כל ארצה3 לא תזרע ולא תצמיח כו׳.
and therefore it preserves a thing and also destroys [it], as it is written, “Sulfur and salt, a burning, all its land; it shall not be sown and shall not sprout,” etc.
That is why salt both preserves and destroys, as in the description of a land laid waste with “sulfur and salt” (Deuteronomy 29:22).
Following the Ramban, salt combines water and fire, and so it has two opposite powers: to preserve and to destroy.
Marei mekomos
- 1והנה הרמב״ן בפי׳ החומש · ראה ביאורו באוה״ת ויקרא-א ע׳ רלא.
- 2שהמלח הוא מים ובכח השמש הבא בהם יעשה מלח · Ramban on Leviticus 2:13
- 3גפרית ומלח שרפה כל ארצה · Deuteronomy 29:22
43ועיין ברבינו בחיי שביאר דבריו1 דהיינו שכלול משני המדות חו״ג [חסד וגבורה] שבהם הנהגת העולם וקיומו כי מלך במשפט יעמיד ארץ.2
And see Rabbeinu Bachya, who explained his words: that is, that [salt] is composed of the two attributes, Chesed and Gevurah, by which the world is conducted and sustained, for “a king, through justice, establishes the land.”
Rabbeinu Bachya explains the Ramban: salt holds the two attributes by which the world is run and kept in being, kindness and severity, as “a king establishes the land through justice” (Proverbs 29:4).
והוא ע״ד הנזכר בזח״א [בזהר חלק א] דנ״א ע״א3 בענין תכלת דאכיל ושצי ות״ח [ותא חזי] אע״ג [אף על גב] דאורחא דהאי נהורא תכלא אוכמא לשיצאה4 כו׳ ואתם הדברים בה׳ אלקיכם חיים כו׳ ע״ש
This is along the lines of what is mentioned in the Zohar, Part I, folio 51a, concerning the blue (techeles) that consumes and destroys: “Come and see: although the way of this blue-black light is to destroy, etc., ‘But you who cleave to Havayah your G‑d are alive,’” etc.; see there.
The Zohar (1:51a) says the same of the blue-black light (techeles) of a flame, which consumes; yet it adds, “But you who cleave to Havayah your G‑d are alive” (Deuteronomy 4:4).
כי המל׳ נקרא נהורא תכלא ארץ אוכלת יושביה5 והיינו שמכלה את הקוצים והרשעים שהם יש ודבר נפרד היא מכלה אותם
For Malchus is called “the blue light,” “a land that consumes its inhabitants”: that is, it consumes the thorns and the wicked; those who are a “something” and a separate entity, it consumes them.
Malchus is that blue light, “a land that consumes its inhabitants” (Numbers 13:32): it consumes the “thorns,” the wicked, who regard themselves as separate entities. In Likkutei Torah, Sh’lach, the Alter Rebbe quotes this Zohar: the spies meant the words as slander, but they are praise, for to those who cleave to G‑d this self-nullification is life.
אבל ואתם הדבקים6 ע״י שיש בכל אחד בחינת ביטול למס״נ [למסירות נפש] באחד עי״ז אדרבה חיים כו׳ וכענין הקב״ה מוציא חמה מנרתיקה7 צדיקים מתרפאים בה ורשעים נכוין בה.
But “you who cleave,” since each one has the level of nullification, to give over his soul in “One,” through this, on the contrary, [are] “alive,” etc. And it is like the matter of “The Holy One, blessed be He, takes the sun out of its sheath: the righteous are healed by it, and the wicked are burned by it.”
But those who cleave to G‑d, through the self-nullification of giving their soul at “One,” are given life by it. It is like the sun that G‑d will take out of its sheath: it heals the righteous and burns the wicked (Nedarim 8b).
Salt’s double power is the double nature of Malchus, the consuming blue light: it destroys what stands apart as a separate “something” and gives life to those who are nullified to G‑d.
Marei mekomos
- 1ועי׳ ברבינו בחיי שביאר דבריו · ראה באוה״ת ויקרא ע׳ רכז.
- 2מלך במשפט יעמיד ארץ · Proverbs 29:4
- 3והוא ע״ד הנזכר בזח״א דנ״א ע״א · ראה לקמן פ׳ בשלח מה, ג. אוה״ת ויקרא-א ע׳ רלא.
- 4אע״ג דאורחא דהאי נהורא תכלא אוכמא לשיצאה · Zohar, Bereshit 86:248–263
- 5ארץ אוכלת יושביה · Numbers 13:32
- 6ואתם הדבקים · Deuteronomy 4:4
- 7הקב״ה מוציא חמה מנרתיקה · Nedarim 8b:6
44והנה נהורא תכלא תכלת שרשו מגבורות דאבא וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] המלח שרשו משם כנ״ל. לכן יש במלח ג״כ ב׳ הכחות
Now, “the blue light,” techeles, has its root in the Gevuros of Abba, and likewise salt has its root there, as mentioned above. Therefore salt too has the two powers;
The blue light has its root in the Gevuros of Abba, and so does salt. So salt too has two powers.
דהיינו כמ״ש במ״א שהתורה נקרא עוז ותושיה1 פי׳ שנותן עוז כח וגבורה בנפש האלקית ומתשת כח נפש הבהמית.
that is, as is written elsewhere, that the Torah is called “strength and tushiyah,” meaning that it gives strength, power and might to the G‑dly soul, and weakens (mateshes) the power of the animal soul.
The Torah is called “strength and tushiyah”: it gives strength to the G‑dly soul and, reading tushiyah as mateshes, “weakens,” it weakens the animal soul.
והיינו על ידי כי בחכמה אתברירו הוא מברר נפש הבהמית ומפריד הרע ממנו כו׳ וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] כי שמים כעשן נמלחו2 (בישעיה סי׳ נ״א ו׳).
And this is because “through Chochmah they are refined”: it refines the animal soul and separates the evil from it, etc. And this is what is written, “For the heavens shall dissolve (nimlachu) like smoke” (in Isaiah, chapter 51, [verse] 6).
It does so because “through Chochmah they are refined”: wisdom refines the animal soul and separates the evil from it. Hence “the heavens shall dissolve (nimlachu) like smoke” (Isaiah 51:6), a verb from the same root as melach, salt.
והיינו כי שמים אש ומים3 והיינו המדות חו״ג [חסד וגבורה] ויש בהן זה לעומת זה4 שמים דקדושה כמ״ש השמים כסאי5 שהם המדות כשר פסול כו׳ ולעומת זה מדות הרעות נקרא שמים דקליפה.
That is: shamayim (heaven) is esh and mayim (fire and water), that is, the attributes of Chesed and Gevurah; and in them there is one opposite the other: the heavens of holiness, as it is written, “The heavens are My throne,” which are the attributes: fit, unfit, etc.; and opposite them the evil attributes are called the heavens of kelipah.
Shamayim, “heavens,” is read as esh and mayim, “fire and water,” the emotions of kindness and severity. There are holy “heavens,” as in “The heavens are My throne” (Isaiah 66:1), and opposite them the “heavens” of kelipah, the evil emotions.
Salt, like the Torah, strengthens the G‑dly soul and weakens the animal soul; its “dissolving” power is aimed at the unholy “heavens,” the evil emotions.
The Kehot note gives the Zohar Chadash, Midrash HaNe’elam on Bereishis, as the place where the Torah is called “strength and tushiyah” in this sense.
Marei mekomos
- 1שהתורה נקרא עוז ותושי׳ · בז״ח במדרש הנעלם בראשית (ו, ב) [ה, ב] יעו״ש. מבו׳ הדבר כך. [כ].
- 2כי שמים כעשן נמלחו · Isaiah 51:6
- 3שמים אש ומים · Chagigah 12a:19–20
- 4זה לעומת זה · Ecclesiastes 7:14
- 5השמים כסאי · Isaiah 66:1
45וע״ז נאמר והיו שמיך אשר על ראשך1 נחושת. וכמ״ש בת״ז [בתיקוני זהר] תקון ח׳ ובשל״ה [ובשני לוחות הברית] דפ״ח ע״ב בשער האותיות אות קו״ף בענין קונה שמים וארץ כו׳
And of this it is said, “And your heavens that are over your head shall be copper,” as is written in the Tikkunei Zohar, Tikkun 8, and in the Shelah, folio 88b, in the Gate of the Letters, the letter kuf, concerning “Possessor (koneh) of heaven and earth,” etc.
Of the unholy heavens it is said, “your heavens that are over your head shall be copper” (Deuteronomy 28:23), as the Tikkunei Zohar and the Shelah (on the letter kuf and “Possessor of heaven and earth”) explain.
ועל זה נאמר כי שמים כעשן נמלחו ופרש״י [ופירש רש״י / ופירוש רש״י] לשון רקבון עיין בירמיה ל״ח י״ב בפרש״י [בפירש רש״י / בפירוש רש״י],
And of this it is said, “For the heavens shall dissolve (nimlachu) like smoke,” and Rashi explains [it as] a term of rotting; see Rashi on Jeremiah 38:12.
These are the heavens that “dissolve like smoke”; Rashi explains nimlachu as rotting, as in Jeremiah 38:12.
והיינו ע״י המלח דקדושה שמכלה ומכרית היש ודבר נפרד כו׳. ועיין מ״ש בד״ה זאת חקת התורה23 בענין להקריב אותיות להרקיב כו׳ ע״ש.4
And this is through the salt of holiness, which consumes and destroys the “something” (yesh) and separate entity, etc. And see what is written in the discourse beginning “This is the statute of the Torah,” on the matter of lehakriv (to offer) [having the letters of] leharkiv (to rot), etc.; see there.
That rotting is the work of the holy salt, which destroys the sense of separate self. The text refers to the discourse on the red heifer, “This is the statute of the Torah,” where lehakriv, “to offer,” is linked with leharkiv, “to rot.”
The salt of holiness makes the unholy “heavens,” the evil emotions, rot away, just as an offering breaks down the separate self.
The discourse on the red heifer explains that the burning separates the evil mixed into the sparks of Tohu, leaving the “ashes,” the pure essence; so too the emotions of the animal soul, which come from kelipas nogah, must have the evil mixed into them burned away.
Marei mekomos
- 1והיו שמיך אשר על ראשך · Deuteronomy 28:23
- 2בד״ה זאת חוקת התורה · לקו״ת חקת נח, ד.
- 3זאת חקת התורה · Numbers 19:2
- 4
46והנה כמו שהמלח יש בו כח להכרית את הרע להיות שמים כעשן נמלחו כו׳. וע״ד שפי׳ בש״ך [בשפתי כהן (הש״ך)] ס״פ תצא בשם המדרש1 בענין תמחה את זכר עמלק מתחת השמים2 אתה מתחת השמים ואני מעל לשמים כו׳. כמ״כ [כמו כן] יש בו כח לקיים את הטוב
Now, just as salt has in it the power to destroy the evil, so that “the heavens shall dissolve like smoke,” etc., and along the lines of what is explained in the Shach, at the end of [Parshas] Teitzei, in the name of the Midrash, on “You shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under the heavens”: “You, from under the heavens, and I, from above the heavens,” etc., so too it has in it the power to sustain the good,
Salt destroys evil, as the heavens “dissolve like smoke.” The Siftei Kohen (Shach) on the Torah cites a Midrash on “You shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under the heavens”: “you” blot it out below, and G‑d blots it out above the heavens. Just so, salt also has the power to preserve the good.
וכמ״ש גבי אהרן ברית מלח עולם3 וכן גבי דוד (ד״ה [דברי הימים] ב׳ י״ג ה׳), ועיין מזה ברבות ר״פ קדושים.
as it is written regarding Aharon, “an everlasting covenant of salt,” and likewise regarding David (II Chronicles 13:5); and see about this in the Rabbos, at the beginning of [Parshas] Kedoshim.
As G‑d’s covenant with Aharon is “an everlasting covenant of salt” (Numbers 18:19), and so too with David (II Chronicles 13:5).
והיינו שנותן טעם להיות טעמו וראו כי טוב4 ה׳ ונותן כח בנפש האלקית כנ״ל
That is, it gives taste, so that there be “Taste and see that Havayah is good,” and it gives strength to the G‑dly soul, as mentioned above;
Salt gives taste, as in “Taste and see that Havayah is good” (Psalms 34:9), and strengthens the G‑dly soul.
וגם מהפך הטוב דנפש הבהמית להתעלות בקדושה שזהו ענין על כל קרבנך תקריב מלח כנ״ל. וכמ״ש לקמן שמלח לשון תערובות והפך והיינו שמהפך נה״ב [נפש הבהמית] ממרירו למיתקו:
and it also transforms the good of the animal soul, to be elevated in holiness, which is the matter of “On all your offerings you shall offer salt,” as mentioned above. And as is written below, that melach (salt) is a term of mixing and reversal; that is, it transforms the animal soul from bitterness to sweetness.
It also transforms the good in the animal soul and raises it to holiness; that is “on all your offerings you shall offer salt.” As explained below, melach means mixing and reversal: it turns the animal soul from bitter to sweet.
Salt both destroys the evil and preserves and elevates the good, turning the animal soul from bitterness to sweetness.
Marei mekomos
- 1בשם המדרש · Zohar II, 66a
- 2תמחה את זכר עמלק מתחת השמים · Deuteronomy 25:19
- 3ברית מלח עולם · Numbers 18:19
- 4טעמו וראו כי טוב · Psalms 34:9
47ז וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] גבי אלישע שריפא את מי יריחו ע״י מלח (במ״ב סי׳ ב׳ כ״א) וכמ״ש בזח״א [בזהר חלק א] דרמ״א ע״ב1 דאיהו ממרק ומבשם מרירו לאטעמא.23
7. And this is what is written concerning Elisha, who healed the waters of Jericho by means of salt (in II Kings, chapter 2, [verse] 21), and as is written in the Zohar, Part I, folio 241b, that it “cleanses and sweetens the bitterness, to give taste.”
Section 7 brings Elisha, who healed the bad waters of Jericho with salt (II Kings 2:21). The Zohar (1:241b) says salt “cleanses and sweetens the bitterness, to give taste.”
ועוי״ל [ועוד יש לומר] בזה כי מים הרעים שרשם נמשך ע״י ההבדלה שהבדיל בין מים עליונים ובין מים תחתונים.
One may further say about this that the bad waters have their root drawn from the separation by which He separated between the upper waters and the lower waters.
A further explanation: the “bad waters” have their root in the separation G‑d made on the second day of creation between the upper and lower waters.
ומזה נמשך הפסולת דמים שהם מים הרעים ע״ד מים המאררים4 כו׳ עיין זח״ב [זהר חלק ב׳] שמות ד״ו ע״א ובפ׳ נשא דקכ״ה ע״א ובפרדס בעה״כ [בערכי הכינויים] ערך מים בסופו ובמא״א [ובמאורי אור] אות מ׳ ססע״י [סוף סעיף] ט״ז,5
From this is drawn the dross of the waters, which are the bad waters, along the lines of “the bitter waters that bring the curse,” etc. (See the Zohar, Part II, Shemos, folio 6a, and in Parshas Naso, folio 125a; and in the Pardes, in Erchei HaKinuyim, the entry “water,” at its end; and in Me’orei Or, the letter mem, at the end of section 16.)
From that separation came the dross of the waters, “bad waters,” like the “bitter waters that bring the curse” of the sotah (Numbers 5). The text gives references in the Zohar, the Pardes and Me’orei Or.
והנה רש״י [רבי שלמה יצחקי] פי׳ כאן ע״פ ולא תשבית מלח שהובטחו מים תחתונים ליקרב ע״ג [על גבי] המזבח במלח ובניסוך המים.6
Now, Rashi explains here, on the verse “And you shall not omit the salt,” that the lower waters were promised to be offered upon the altar, in the salt and in the water libation.
Rashi explains our verse: the lower waters were promised that they would be offered on the altar, in the salt and in the water libation of Sukkos.
The salt that healed Jericho’s waters and the salt of the offerings both repair the lower waters, which were separated from the upper waters.
A Kehot note quotes the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah on “sweetens the bitterness”: Malchus is built from the Gevuros, so the force of judgments comes from it, which is the “bitterness,” and Yesod sweetens its judgments, as the Name Mah refines the Name Ban.
Marei mekomos
- 1בזח״א דרמ״א ע״ב · ראה גם אוה״ת ויקרא-ד ע׳ א׳סב.
- 2ומבשם מרירו לאטעמא · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא-א ע׳ רל: יש לפרש כי המל׳ בנינה מהגבורות ע״כ ממנה נמשך תוקף הדינים וזהו ענין המרירו, וע״י היסוד ממתיק דיני׳ גם זהו ע״ד מ״ה מברר ב״ן, ע״ש.
- 3ממרק ומבשם מרירו לאטעמא · Zohar, Vayechi 65:661–66:673
- 4מים המאררים · Numbers 5:18
- 5כי מים הרעים שרשם נמשך ע״י ההבדלה . . סעי׳ טז · ראה גם אוה״ת ויקרא-ד ע׳ פא.
- 6שהובטחו מים תחתונים ליקרב ע״ג המזבח במלח ובניסוך המים · Rashi on Leviticus 2:13
48והיינו שע״י המלח של הקרבן מתעלים המים תחתונים עד שנעשו בבחי׳ מים חיים.
That is: through the salt of the offering the lower waters are elevated until they become living waters.
Through the salt of the offering the lower waters are raised until they become “living waters.”
וז״ס [וזה סוד] רפואת מים הרעים דיריחו ע״י המלח שהוא שרש התיקון לבחי׳ מים תחתונים כו׳ עד שנעשו עי״ז בבחי׳ באר מים חיים כו׳.
And this is the secret of the healing of the bad waters of Jericho through salt, which is the root of the rectification of the lower waters, etc., until through this they become “a well of living waters,” etc.
That is the inner meaning of Elisha healing Jericho’s bad waters with salt: salt is the root of the repair of the lower waters, until they become “a well of living waters.”
Salt repairs and elevates the lower waters, turning bad waters into living waters, the model for elevating what is low.
Sweetening judgment and the bread of poverty ¶49–57
49וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] יובן ענין זה בנפש שבכדי לרפאות המים המרים דנה״ב [דנפש הבהמית] שנמשכת אחר תענוגי עוה״ז הנקרא בשם מרירו. כמ״ש כי נופת תטופנה כו׳ ואחריתה1 מרה כלענה.2 וע׳ זח״ב [זהר חלק ב׳] ויקהל דר״ג ע״ב
Likewise this matter will be understood in the soul: in order to heal the bitter waters of the animal soul, which is drawn after the pleasures of this world, which are called by the name “bitterness” (meriru), as it is written, “For [her lips] drip honey,” etc., “but her end is bitter as wormwood” (and see the Zohar, Part II, Vayakhel, folio 203b),
The same holds within a person. The animal soul is drawn after the pleasures of this world, which are called “bitterness” (meriru) because their end is bitter, as Proverbs says of forbidden pleasure that its lips “drip honey” but its end is “bitter as wormwood.” These are its “bad waters,” which need healing.
this is through the Torah, which is called by the name “salt,” and as it is written, “It shall be healing to your navel,”
The healing is the Torah, called salt, of which Proverbs says, “It shall be healing to your navel.”
that is, even “from your middle downward,” which is below the firmament that separates between water and water, etc. Therefore the salt is called “the covenant of your G‑d.”
“Your navel” is read as reaching even “from your middle downward,” the lowest level, below the firmament that separated the upper waters from the lower. That is why the salt is called “the covenant of your G‑d.” The Kehot note sends the reader to the first discourse on “There are sixty queens” (Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim), which cites the heretic in the Talmud who gave “from your middle upward” and “from your middle downward” to two powers, and explains that when Israel draw the Infinite Light down below, upper and lower are united.
כי שורש הדינים והמרירות נמשכים משם אלקים שיש בו ק״ך צירופים המשתלשלים למטה עד סוף העשיה ומהם יונקים ק״ך צירופים דנוגה שבין שניהם נעשים מ״ר ב״פ [ב׳ פעמים] ק״ך וכחשבון עמלק.7
For the root of the judgments and the bitterness is drawn from the Name Elokim, which has 120 combinations that descend below to the end of Asiyah; and from them the 120 combinations of nogah draw their nourishment, so that between the two of them they make 240 (mar, “bitter”), twice 120, which is the numerical value of Amalek.
Judgments and bitterness come from the Name Elokim, whose letters can be arranged in 120 ways; these descend to the bottom of the world of action, and the 120 combinations of nogah, the mixed husk, feed on them. Together they make 240, written מ״ר, which spells mar, “bitter,” and is the numerical value of Amalek (עמלק).
The Torah, as salt, heals the “bitter waters” of the animal soul, the pleasures of this world, whose root is the judgments of the Name Elokim and their counterpart in kelipah, Amalek.
The Kehot note gives the source of the 120 combinations and their sum, Amalek, in Me’orei Or (letter mem, section 92) and in Ya’ir Nesiv, which cites the Arizal’s Likkutei Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1נופת תטופנה . . ואחריתה · Proverbs 5:3
- 2ואחריתה מרה כלענה · Proverbs 5:4
- 3רפאות תהי לשרך · שם ג, ח.
- 4רפאות תהי לשרך · Proverbs 3:8
- 5מפלגך ולתתא · ועל״ק שה״ש ד״ה ששים המה גו׳ הא׳ פ״א וב׳ יעו״ש. [כ].
- 6רקיע המבדיל בין מים למים · Genesis 1:6
- 7מ״ר ב״פ ק״ך וכחשבון עמלק · מאו״א מ׳ סעי׳ צ״ב וביאיר נתיב בשם לקו״ת להאריז״ל.
50והמלח ממתיק הדינים הנ״ל ע״י שממשיך משרש ועיקר הגבורות דקדושה כו׳ ומקיים ומכרית כו׳ כנ״ל.
And salt sweetens the judgments mentioned above, by drawing from the root and essence of the Gevuros of holiness, etc.; and it sustains and destroys, etc., as mentioned above.
Salt sweetens these judgments because it draws on the root of the holy Gevuros; so it both sustains and destroys, as explained above.
ובכהאריז״ל [ובכתבי האריז״ל] אמר מלח כחשבון ג׳ שמות הוי׳ ולכן נאמר גבי אהרן ברית מלח עולם1 כי הכהנים מברכים את העם שלש ברכות שהן ג׳ שמות הוי׳ דיברכך יאר וישא,2 ששרשן גבוה מאד נעלה למעלה מההשתלשלות
And in the writings of the Arizal, of blessed memory, he said that melach (salt) is the numerical value of three Names Havayah. Therefore it is said regarding Aharon, “an everlasting covenant of salt,” for the kohanim bless the people with three blessings, which are the three Names Havayah of “May He bless you,” “May He shine” and “May He lift up,” whose root is very high, exalted above the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus),
The Arizal’s writings note that melach (מלח, 78) equals three times the Name Havayah (26). So Aharon’s covenant is “a covenant of salt”: the kohanim bless the people with three blessings, each with the Name Havayah, from a root far above the chain of worlds.
ובזה הוא קיום העולם וזהו שנק׳ מלח שהוא קיום הדבר כו׳ ועם היות המלח הוא גבורה אך גם ברכת כהנים נקרא ששים גבורים3 ברבות נשא פי״א [פרק י״א].
and through this is the sustaining of the world. And this is why it is called salt, which is what sustains a thing, etc. And although salt is Gevurah, the Priestly Blessing too is called “sixty mighty men (gibborim),” in the Rabbos, Naso, chapter 11.
Through these blessings the world is sustained, and salt is what preserves. And though salt is severity (Gevurah), the Midrash (Bamidbar Rabbah, Naso) also calls the Priestly Blessing “sixty mighty men,” severity in the service of blessing.
Salt, numerically three Names Havayah, is linked to the threefold Priestly Blessing that sustains the world; its severity is a holy strength that sweetens judgment.
Marei mekomos
- 1ברית מלח עולם · Numbers 18:19
- 2דיברכך יאר וישא · Numbers 6:24–26
- 3ששים גבורים · Song of Songs 3:7
51וזהו פי׳ ברית אלקיך שהוא ענין ההמשכה משם הוי׳ בשם אלקים כו׳ שיהי׳ [שיהיה] בבחי׳ אלקיך ממש בבחי׳ גילוי בפנימיות. וכמארז״ל [וכמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] מה ברית האמור במלח, מלח ממתקת.1 דהיינו המתקת הדינין של שם אלקים.
And this is the meaning of “the covenant of your G‑d (Elokecha)”: it is the matter of the drawing down from the Name Havayah into the Name Elokim, etc., so that it be in the state of “your G‑d” in actuality, in a state of revelation in the inner dimension (pnimiyus). And as our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “Just as with the covenant mentioned regarding salt, salt sweetens”; that is, the sweetening of the judgments of the Name Elokim.
“The covenant of your G‑d” means drawing the transcendent Name Havayah into the Name Elokim, so that G‑d becomes “your G‑d,” revealed within. The Talmud’s comparison, “as the covenant of salt: salt sweetens” (Berachos 5a), means sweetening the judgments of the Name Elokim.
The salt is “the covenant of your G‑d” because it draws Havayah into Elokim and so sweetens judgment, making G‑d revealed and personal.
Marei mekomos
- 1מה ברית האמור במלח מלח ממתקת · Berakhot 5a:19
52ובת״ז [ובתיקוני זהר] תקון כ״א דף נ״ד ע״א1 מלח אותיות חלם ואותיות מחל כי חולם הוא הנקודה שבראשי אתוין שמורה על עליות המל׳ להיות עטרת תפארת כמ״ש בתו״א [בתורה אור] פ׳ נח סד״ה להבין הענין שתפלת הבעל עסק כו׳ שנקודה א׳ העליונה כולל בחינה התחתונה כו׳ ע״ש,
And in the Tikkunei Zohar, Tikkun 21, folio 54a: melach (salt) has the letters of cholem and the letters of mochel (forgives). For the cholem is the point above the letters, which indicates the ascent of Malchus to be the crown of Tiferes, as is written in Torah Ohr, Parshas Noach, at the end of the discourse beginning “To understand the matter that the prayer of a man of business,” etc.: that one upper point includes the lower level, etc.; see there.
The Tikkunei Zohar finds in מלח (salt) the letters of חלם (cholem, the vowel-point written above the letters) and מחל (forgives). The cholem above the letters signifies Malchus rising to become the crown of Tiferes, as Torah Ohr, Noach, explains at the end of the discourse on the prayer of a man of business: a single upper point includes the lower level.
ומשם נמשך המחילה ביוהכ״פ [ביום הכפורים] וכן הקרבנות באין לכפר ועלייה זו ע״י ברית מלח כו׳.
And from there comes the forgiveness (mechilah) on Yom Kippur, and likewise the offerings come to atone; and this ascent is through the covenant of salt, etc.
From that ascent comes forgiveness (mechilah) on Yom Kippur and the atonement of the offerings, and it is brought about by the covenant of salt.
גם פי׳ חלם לשון חיזוק כמו יחלמו בניהם2 (איוב סי׳ ל״ט ד׳) שפרש״י [שפירש רש״י / שפירוש רש״י] יחזקו. וכן ותחלימני והחייני (בישעיה ל״ח י״ו) פרש״י [פירש רש״י / פירוש רש״י] תבריאני ותחזקני.
Also, chalam means strengthening, as in “Their young grow strong (yachlemu)” (Job, chapter 39, [verse] 4), which Rashi explains as “grow strong”; and likewise “And You will make me healthy (vesachalimeni) and keep me alive” (in Isaiah 38:16), [which] Rashi explains, “You will heal me and strengthen me.”
Chalam also means strength: “their young grow strong (yachlemu)” (Job 39:4) and “You will make me healthy (vesachalimeni)” (Isaiah 38:16), as Rashi explains both.
ועד״ז פי׳ רבינו בחיי בפ׳ תצוה בענין אבן אחלמה וסגולת האבן הזאת שמחזקת את הלב כו׳.
In the same way Rabbeinu Bachya explains, in Parshas Tetzaveh, concerning the achlamah stone, that the special property of this stone is that it strengthens the heart, etc.
Rabbeinu Bachya likewise explains the achlamah stone of the High Priest’s breastplate as a stone that strengthens the heart.
And this strengthening is along the lines of what is written, “And He will give strength to His king,” and as is written on the verse “And now, let the power of Ado-nai be great,” etc.
This strength is like “He will give strength to His king” (I Samuel 2:10), strength given to Malchus, and like “Let the power of Ado-nai be great” (Numbers 14:17), as explained in the discourse on that verse.
וזהו נמשך ג״כ מבחי׳ מלח שהוא הכח המעמיד ומקיים הדבר שזהו פי׳ ברית מלח עולם6 הנאמר גבי אהרן ס״פ קרח וגבי דוד (בדברי הימים ב׳ סי׳ י״ג ה׳).
And this too is drawn from the level of salt, which is the power that maintains and sustains a thing. This is the meaning of “an everlasting covenant of salt,” said regarding Aharon at the end of Parshas Korach, and regarding David (in II Chronicles, chapter 13, [verse] 5).
This too comes from salt, the power that maintains and preserves. That is the “everlasting covenant of salt” made with Aharon (Numbers 18:19) and with David (II Chronicles 13:5).
ועמ״ש סד״ה שובה ישראל עד.7 להיות יחו״ת [יחודא תתאה] כמו יחו״ע [יחודא עילאה] בבחי׳ תרין, ריעין בחי׳ אהל בל יצען.8 וכמ״ש וארשתיך לי לעולם:910
And see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “Return, O Israel, unto”: that the lower unity (yichuda tata’ah) be like the higher unity (yichuda ila’ah), in the manner of “two companions,” the level of “a tent that shall not be moved”; and as it is written, “And I will betroth you to Me forever.”
The discourse “Return, O Israel, unto” explains the goal: that the lower unity, G‑d within the world, become like the higher unity, as two inseparable companions, “a tent that shall not be moved,” as in “I will betroth you to Me forever.”
Salt (מלח) is read as cholem, the point that raises Malchus to be a crown, as mochel, forgiveness, and as strength; its covenant makes the union of G‑d with the world permanent.
The Likkutei Torah discourse on “And now, let the power of Ado-nai be great” explains Ado-nai as G‑d’s kingship, and “power” as the encompassing Infinite Light drawn down through accepting His kingship in the mitzvos, revealed as the power in a hand becomes visible only when it throws a stone. A Kehot note adds that, by the sense of the passage, the Tikkunei Zohar reference here is to folio 47a in current editions.
Marei mekomos
- 1תקון — נ״ד ע״א · לפננו ע״פ משמעות הענין הוא (דמ״ז, א). [כ].
- 2יחלמו בניהם · Job 39:4
- 3ויתן עוז למלכו · I Samuel 2:10
- 4ע״פ ועתה יגדל נא · אולי הכוונה לקו״ת שלח לט, ב. וראה באוה״ת פ׳ שלח ע״פ זה בארוכה.
- 5ועתה יגדל נא כח אדני · Numbers 14:17
- 6ברית מלח עולם · Numbers 18:19
- 7סד״ה שובה ישראל עד · לקו״ת ש״ש סז, ג.
- 8אהל בל יצען · Isaiah 33:20
- 9וארשתיך לי לעולם · Hosea 2:21
- 10
53ח והנה לפ״ז [לפי זה] צ״ל דגבי מצה כ׳ [כתב] הפוסקים שלא ליתן מלח בפת בפסח כמ״ש בטוש״ע [בטור ושולחן ערוך] סי׳ תנ״ה.
8. Now, according to this we must understand [why], regarding matzah, the halachic authorities wrote not to put salt in the bread on Pesach, as is written in the Tur and Shulchan Aruch, section 455.
Section 8 raises a question from Jewish law: the codes (Tur and Shulchan Aruch, section 455) say not to put salt in the matzah dough on Pesach.
ולכאורה אינו מובן לפמשנ״ת [לפי מה שנתבאר] למעלה שורש ענין המלח מדוע יהיה שבמצה לא יהיה מלח וכמ״ש בגמרא פ״ח [פרק ח׳] דשבת דע״ט ע״א מצה כמשמעו דלא מליח1 כו׳,
Seemingly this is not understood, according to what was explained above about the root of the matter of salt: why should there be no salt in matzah? And as is written in the Gemara, chapter 8 of Shabbos, folio 79a: “matzah, as its meaning implies: that is not salted,” etc.
Given everything said about salt, why should matzah have none? The Talmud itself (Shabbos 79a) says “matzah, as its name implies, is unsalted.”
ובטו״ב סי׳ תנ״ה כתב לפי כי המלח הוא שורש הדין כו׳, ואין זה מספיק דאדרבה הוא מיתוק הדינים כנ״ל.
And in the טו״ב, section 455, he wrote [that it is] because salt is the root of judgment, etc. But this does not suffice, for on the contrary, it is the sweetening of the judgments, as mentioned above.
One commentary on that section explains that salt is the root of judgment. That does not suffice, since salt sweetens judgment, as shown above.
אך הענין מבואר בת״ז [בתיקוני זהר] תקון ס״ט דק״ח ע״א2 לחם עני3 בלא מלחא כו׳ בגין דאיהו מצה פרוסה כו׳ עד דתהא שלימה לא צריך לקרבא עלה מלח דאיהו חלם ומאי ניהו חלם אמצעי דכולהו עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו],
But the matter is explained in the Tikkunei Zohar, Tikkun 69, folio 108a: “The bread of poverty, without salt,” etc., “because it is a broken matzah,” etc., “until it is whole, one should not offer upon it salt, which is cholem; and what is cholem? The middle one of them all.” End of quote.
The answer is in the Tikkunei Zohar: the “bread of poverty” is without salt because it is a broken matzah, and until it is made whole, salt, which is the cholem, “the middle one of them all,” is not to be offered on it.
ופי׳ בכס״מ שכשהיא פרוסה היא אות דל״ת לשון דלות היינו לחם עוני.
And the Kisei Melech explains that when it is broken it is the letter dalet, a term of poverty (dalus), that is, “bread of poverty.”
The Kisei Melech, Rabbi Shalom Buzaglo’s commentary on the Tikkunei Zohar, explains that broken matzah is the letter dalet, from dalus, “poverty,” hence “bread of poverty.”
The law of unsalted matzah is explained through the Tikkunei Zohar: matzah is “bread of poverty,” a broken dalet, which cannot receive the salt until it is made whole.
A Kehot note adds that in current editions this Tikkunei Zohar passage is on folio 110, and refers to the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah on Vayikra for further discussion.
Marei mekomos
- 1
- 2בת״ז — דק״ח ע״א · לפננו דק״י. [כ]. ראה גם אוה״ת ויקרא-א ע׳ רכט.
- 3לחם עני · Deuteronomy 16:3
54וצריך להשלימה באות ו׳ בתוכה שתהיה ה״א כו׳ ואז דוקא תקריב עליה מלח שהם ג׳ שמות הוי׳ שבחג״ת [שבחסד גבורה תפארת] עכ״ד [עד כאן דבריו].
And it must be completed with the letter vav within it, so that it becomes a hei, etc., and only then shall you offer salt upon it, which is the three Names Havayah that are in Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes. End of his words.
To make it whole, a vav is placed inside the dalet, turning it into a hei. Only then is salt offered on it, the three Names Havayah in Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes.
והענין כי פי׳ לחם עני זהו ע״ד סיהרא לית לה מגרמה כלום1 ואזי היא בחי׳ עניה.
The explanation is that “bread of poverty” is along the lines of “the moon has nothing of its own”; and then it is in the state of poverty.
“Bread of poverty” is Malchus in its state of “the moon, which has nothing of its own,” only what it receives; in that state it is “poor.”
Matzah is the “poor” state of Malchus, which has nothing of its own; it must first be completed before it can receive the salt.
Marei mekomos
- 1סיהרא לית לה מגרמה כלום · Zohar, Vayechi 81:824–82:836
55וכמ״ש בזח״א [בזהר חלק א] בראשית דל״ג1 א׳. ויחי דרמ״ט ע״ב. ואין עני אלא בדעת.2 וע״י קבלתה משמשא3 נפקא ממסכנותא היינו ע״י שנמשך בה הדעת מבחי׳ שמש הוי׳.
(As is written in the Zohar, Part I, Bereishis, folio 33a, [and] Vayechi, folio 249b.) And “there is no poor person except in knowledge.” And through its receiving from the sun, it goes out of its poverty: that is, through Daas being drawn into it from the level of “a sun, Havayah.”
The Zohar says this of the moon, and the Talmud says “the only poor person is one poor in knowledge” (Nedarim 41a). The moon leaves its poverty by receiving from the sun, that is, when Daas is drawn into Malchus from “a sun, Havayah” (Psalms 84:12).
וכמ״ש ברע״מ [ברעיא מהימנא] ר״פ כי תשא העשיר דא עמודא דאמצעיתא. היינו קו האמצעי דעת תפארת ועמ״ש בד״ה וידעת היום4 והשבות כו׳. ומתחלה כשהיא רק בבחי׳ אמונה לבד נק׳ לחם עני.5
And as is written in the Raaya Mehemna, at the beginning of Parshas Ki Sisa: “‘The rich man’: this is the middle pillar,” that is, the middle line, Daas [and] Tiferes. And see what is written in the discourse beginning “And you shall know this day and take [it] to [your heart],” etc. And at first, when it is only in the state of faith alone, it is called “bread of poverty.”
The Ra’aya Mehemna, a part of the Zohar, calls “the rich man” the middle pillar, the middle line of Daas and Tiferes. Before Malchus receives this, while it has faith alone, it is called “bread of poverty.” In Likkutei Torah, Va’eschanan, on “And you shall know this day,” the Alter Rebbe distinguishes faith, which reaches what is beyond grasp, from Daas, a deep and felt awareness, and speaks of nourishing faith until it is fixed in the heart as Daas.
והנה תחלת העבודה צ״ל בבחי׳ אמונה לבד דווקא. וכמארז״ל [וכמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] בא חבקוק6 והעמידן על אחת שנאמר וצדיק באמונתו יחיה.7
Now, the beginning of divine service must be specifically in the manner of faith alone. And as our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “Chavakuk came and based them on one, as it is said, ‘And the righteous man shall live by his faith.’”
Divine service must begin with faith alone. The Talmud says that Chavakuk based all the mitzvos on one, “the righteous man shall live by his faith” (Makkos 24a; Habakkuk 2:4).
וכתיב פתחו שערים ויבוא גוי צדיק שומר אמונים8 (בישעיה סי׳ כ״ו ב׳). וכדפירש״י [וכדפירש רש״י] שם. וכתיב והיה אמונת עתיך חוסן ישועות9 (שם ל״ג ו׳).
And it is written, “Open the gates, that a righteous nation that keeps faith may enter” (in Isaiah, chapter 26, [verse] 2), as Rashi explained there. And it is written, “And the faith of your times shall be a strength of salvations” (there, 33:6).
Isaiah also speaks of “a righteous nation that keeps faith” (26:2), as Rashi explains there, and says, “the faith of your times shall be a strength of salvations” (33:6).
וממנה יבוא אח״כ לבחי׳ הדעת שהוא השגת פנימית התורה וכמארז״ל [וכמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] כל המקיים את התורה10 מעוני סופו לקיימה מעושר. בפ״ד דאבות.11
And from it he will afterwards come to the level of Daas, which is the comprehension of the inner dimension of the Torah. And as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Whoever fulfills the Torah in poverty will in the end fulfill it in wealth” (in chapter 4 of Avos).
From faith one comes later to Daas, the comprehension of the inner Torah. So the Mishnah says, “Whoever fulfills the Torah in poverty will in the end fulfill it in wealth” (Avos 4:9).
ופי׳ במדר׳ [במדרש] שמואל. דר״ל [דרוצה לומר] מעוני הדעת. סופו לקיימה מעושר הדעת שהוא ישפיע עליו מחכמתו כו׳
And it is explained in the Midrash Shmuel that it means “in poverty” of knowledge, [and] “will in the end fulfill it in wealth” of knowledge: that He will bestow upon him of His wisdom, etc.
The Midrash Shmuel, a commentary on Avos, explains that poverty and wealth there mean of knowledge: one who serves with little understanding will in the end be granted G‑d’s wisdom.
וזהו אם אין יראה אין חכמה אם אין חכמה12 אין יראה,13 וא״כ איך יתחיל. אלא כי יש ב׳ בחי׳ יראה הא׳ יראה תתאה והיא תרעא לאעלאה, ולכן אם אין יראה אין חכמה.
And this is “If there is no awe there is no wisdom; if there is no wisdom there is no awe.” If so, how is one to begin? Rather, there are two levels of awe. The first is the lower awe, and it is “the gate for entering”; therefore, “if there is no awe there is no wisdom.”
But the Mishnah also says, “If there is no awe there is no wisdom; if there is no wisdom there is no awe”; where can one begin? The answer is that there are two kinds of awe. The lower awe is “the gate for entering,” the starting point; that is why without awe there is no wisdom.
Matzah, the “bread of poverty,” is service through simple faith; from it a person comes to Daas, the “wealth” of comprehending the inner Torah, beginning with the lower awe that is the gate to wisdom.
Marei mekomos
- 1בזח״א בראשית דל״ג א׳ · מובא באוה״ת ויקרא-ב ע׳ תמב.
- 2ואין עני אלא בדעת · Nedarim 41a:2–3
- 3שמש ה׳ · Psalms 84:12
- 4בד״ה וידעת היום · לקו״ת ואתחנן ד, א.
- 5כשהיא רק בבחי׳ אמונה לבד נק׳ לחם עני · ראה ד״ה השמים כסאי תשל״ו סעי׳ ג (סה״מ מלוקט-ג ע׳ קלד).
- 6בא חבקוק · Makkot 24a:27
- 7וצדיק באמונתו יחי׳ · Habakkuk 2:4
- 8פתחו שערים ויבוא גוי צדיק שומר אמונים · Isaiah 26:2
- 9והיה אמונת עתיך חוסן ישועות · Isaiah 33:6
- 10
- 11בפ״ד דאבות · מ״ט.
- 12אם אין יראה . . אם אין חכמה · אבות ג, יז (בסדר הפוך).
- 13אם אין יראה אין חכמה אם אין חכמה אין יראה · Pirkei Avot 3:17
56ואח״כ ע״י החכמה יזכה ליראה עילאה כו׳ ששם אין שייך חמוץ כו׳. וזהו שאמרו יאה עניותא לישראל.1 ור״ל [ורוצה לומר] שיהיה בעיניו נגד הקב״ה בבחי׳ עני מן הדעת ולהיות בבחי׳ אמונה.
And afterwards, through wisdom, he will merit the higher awe, etc., where leavening (chimutz) does not apply, etc. And this is what they said, “Poverty befits Israel”: meaning that in his own eyes, before the Holy One, blessed be He, he should be in the state of one poor in knowledge, and be in the state of faith.
Through wisdom a person then reaches the higher awe, where there is no room for “leavening,” the swelling of ego. That is why the Sages say “poverty befits Israel”: before G‑d a person should regard himself as poor in understanding and stand in simple faith.
וכמ״ש בסש״ב [בספר של בינונים] ח״א [חלק א׳] פרק י״ח דכתיב פתי יאמין לכל דבר23 ואצל הקב״ה הכל כפתיים,4 וכמ״ש בהמות הייתי עמך5 וכתיב אדם ובהמה תושיע67 הוי׳ וארז״ל [ואמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] פ״ק [פרק קמא] דחולין דף ה׳ ע״ב אלו בני אדם שהם ערומים בדעת כאדם הראשון ומשימים עצמם כבהמה דכאי רוח ע״ש בפרש״י [בפירש רש״י / בפירוש רש״י]8 כו׳
As is written in Sefer shel Beinonim, Part I, chapter 18, that it is written, “The simple one believes every word,” and before the Holy One, blessed be He, all are like simpletons; and as it is written, “I was [as] a beast with You”; and it is written, “Man and beast You save, Havayah,” and our Sages, of blessed memory, said in the first chapter of Chullin, folio 5b: “These are people who are clever in knowledge like Adam, the first man, and make themselves like a beast”: lowly of spirit; see there in Rashi’s commentary, etc.
Tanya, chapter 18, quotes “the simple one believes every word” (Proverbs 14:15) and says that before G‑d all are like simpletons. So too “I was as a beast with You” (Psalms 73:22). The Talmud reads “Man and beast You save, Havayah” (Psalms 36:7) as people who are clever in knowledge like Adam yet make themselves like a beast, humble in spirit, as Rashi explains.
וכ״כ [וכן כתב] ברבות פ׳ בשלח פכ״א ע״פ יונתי אמר הקב״ה אצלי הם כיונה פותה כל מה שאני גוזר עליהם עושים כו׳.
And so it is written in the Rabbos, Parshas Beshalach, chapter 21, on the verse “My dove”: “The Holy One, blessed be He, said: Before Me they are like a simple dove; whatever I decree upon them they do,” etc.
The Midrash says the same: G‑d calls Israel “My dove,” for before Him they are like a simple dove that does whatever He decrees.
The goal of faith is not ignorance but humility: even one who grows wise stands before G‑d as “poor” and “simple,” like a beast that follows its master.
A later Likkutei Torah discourse (Bechukosai) applies the same Talmudic reading of “man and beast” to barley, the food of animals, and to the six orders of the Mishnah, which the Zohar calls “six measures of barley.”
Marei mekomos
- 1יאה עניותא לישראל · Chagigah 9b:12
- 2פתי יאמין לכל דבר · Proverbs 14:15
- 3פתי יאמין לכל דבר · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 18:11
- 4ואצל הקב״ה הכל כפתיים · ראה המשך באתי לגני תש״י פ״ה ע׳ 117 ואילך. ובארוכה בד״ה באתי לגני תשט״ו פ״ד ואילך.
- 5בהמות הייתי עמך · Psalms 73:22
- 6אדם ובהמה תושיע · Psalms 36:7
- 7
- 8וארז״ל פ״ק דחולין . . ע״ש בפרש״י · ערומים בדעות כאדם הראשון ונמשכים אחריך כבהמה דכאי רוח. ראה גם לקמן בחקותי נ, ג.
57וע״כ בענין חיוב אכילת מצה שהוא תחלת העבודה צ״ל לחם עוני דוקא שהוא בחי׳ אמונה ואתכפיא בלי שום טעם ודעת.
Therefore, in the matter of the obligation to eat matzah, which is the beginning of divine service, it must be specifically “bread of poverty,” which is the level of faith and subjugation (iskafya), without any reason or knowledge.
So the matzah eaten at the start of Pesach, the beginning of divine service, must be “bread of poverty”: faith and self-subjugation, without reasons or understanding.
וע״כ אין ליתן בה מלח. שהמלח הוא נותן טעם להיות בחי׳ טעם ודעת שהוא גילוי פנימית התורה כו׳.
Therefore one should not put salt in it; for salt gives taste, so that there be the level of taste and knowledge, which is the revelation of the inner dimension (pnimiyus) of the Torah, etc.
That is why matzah has no salt: salt gives taste, the taste and understanding that come with revealing the inner Torah, which belongs to a later stage.
וראשית העבודה צ״ל בבחי׳ לחם עוני דוקא. ולכן ישראל מונין ללבנה,1 אלא שאח״כ צריך להיות בה המשכת הדעת מבחינת שמשא
And the beginning of divine service must be specifically in the manner of “bread of poverty.” Therefore Israel count by the moon. But afterwards there must be drawn into it Daas, from the level of the sun,
Service begins with “bread of poverty,” and so Israel count their calendar by the moon, which has no light of its own. Afterwards Daas must be drawn into it from the “sun.”
וזהו ענין מצה עשירה, ועמ״ש בפי׳ רבת תעשרנה פלג אלקים2 בד״ה והיה מספר בנ״י [בני ישראל] כחול הים34 כו׳ ואזי מבחי׳ דל״ת נעשית ה׳ ועמ״ש בזה סד״ה המגביהי לשבת5 כו׳:6
and this is the matter of “rich matzah.” And see what is written in the explanation of “You greatly enrich it; the stream of G‑d” in the discourse beginning “And the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea,” etc.; and then from the level of dalet it becomes a hei. And see what is written about this at the end of the discourse beginning “Who is raised up to sit,” etc.
That is “rich matzah,” matzah made with more than flour and water. The text refers to the discourse on “And the number of the children of Israel” for “You greatly enrich it,” and to the discourse on “Who is raised up to sit” (Torah Ohr, Miketz), where the dalet is read as dalis, “having nothing of its own,” which becomes a hei through the yud placed within it: so the dalet of poverty becomes a hei.
Unsalted matzah is the first stage of service, simple faith like the moon’s borrowed light; later, Daas from the “sun” enriches it, turning the dalet of poverty into a hei.
The Torah Ohr discourse on “Who is raised up to sit” explains the dalet as dalis, “having nothing of its own,” which becomes a hei through the yud placed within it, as tzedek becomes tzedakah through a mitzvah. The discourse on “And the number of the children of Israel” speaks of the 620 mitzvos and the 600,000 souls, and of the time when their number will be beyond counting.
Marei mekomos
- 1ישראל מונין ללבנה · Sukkah 29a:10
- 2רבת תעשרנה פלג אלקים · Psalms 65:10
- 3בד״ה והיה מספר בנ״י כחול הים · לקו״ת במדבר ה, ד.
- 4והיה מספר בנ״י כחול הים · Hosea 2:1
- 5המגביהי לשבת · Psalms 113:5
- 6סד״ה המגביהי לשבת כו׳ · תו״א לח, ד.
The covenant that blends the worlds ¶58–66
58ט וביאור הענין יש להקדים מ״ש באו״ת [באור תורה] פ׳ קרח1 בשם הה״מ [הרב המגיד] נ״ע [נשמתו עדן] וז״ל [וזה לשונו] והנה נאמר באהרן ברית מלח עולם2 הוא. הוא כתיב והקרי היא.
9. To explain the matter, we must first preface what is written in Or Torah, Parshas Korach, in the name of the Maggid, whose soul is in Eden; and these are his words: “Now, it is said of Aharon, ‘It (hu) is an everlasting covenant of salt’: it is written hu, and the reading is hi.
Section 9 brings a teaching of the Maggid of Mezritch from Or Torah: in “It is an everlasting covenant of salt” (Numbers 18:19) the word “it” is written hu, the masculine form, but read hi, the feminine.
והנה ידוע שאהרן שושבינא דמטרוניתא3 והוא המקשר עולמות ע״י עבודת הקרבנות והקטורת שהוא לשון קשר. כי תרגום ותקשור על ידו4 בפ׳ וישב וקטרת על ידיה.
Now it is known that Aharon is the groomsman of the Queen (Matronisa), and he is the one who binds the worlds through the service of the offerings and the incense (ketores), which is a term of binding; for the Targum of “and she tied on his hand,” in Parshas Vayeshev, is “uketeras al yedeih.”
Aharon is “the groomsman of the Queen” (the Shechinah), who joins the worlds through the offerings and the incense. Ketores, incense, means binding: the Targum renders “she tied (vatikshor) on his hand” (Genesis 38:28) as “uketeras.”
Aharon, through the offerings and the incense, binds the worlds together, and this is the “covenant of salt” given to him.
Marei mekomos
- 1באו״ת פ׳ קרח · הוצאת קה״ת מו, ג.
- 2ברית מלח עולם · Numbers 18:19
- 3אהרן שושבינא דמטרוניתא · Zohar III, 20a
- 4ותקשור על ידו · Genesis 38:28
59וזהו פי׳ ברית מלח לשון עירוב כמו המלחים. היינו כדפרש״י [כדפירש רש״י / כדפירוש רש״י] בחומש פ׳ כי תשא ע״פ ממולח טהור קדש1 מעורב שיערב יפה יפה ואומר אני שדומה לו וייראו המלחים2 כו׳ שמהפכין כו׳ ע״ש.
And this is the meaning of “covenant of salt (melach)”: a term of mixing, as in hamalachim (the sailors). That is, as Rashi explained in the Chumash, Parshas Ki Sisa, on the verse “salted (memulach), pure, holy”: ‘mixed, that he should mix it very well; and I say that similar to it is “And the sailors (hamalachim) were afraid,” etc., for they turn [the water],’ etc.; see there.
“Covenant of salt” means mixing, from the same root as malachim, “sailors.” Rashi on the incense, “salted (memulach), pure, holy” (Exodus 30:35), explains memulach as “mixed well,” comparing “And the sailors (hamalachim) were afraid” (Jonah 1:5), sailors being so called because they stir the water with their oars.
The root of melach, salt, also means mixing; so the covenant of salt is a covenant to blend things together.
Marei mekomos
- 1ממולח טהור קדש · Exodus 30:35
- 2וייראו המלחים · Jonah 1:5
60ופי׳ ברית מלח שכרת לו ברית שע״י עבודת הקרבנות יקשר ויערב העולם שהם כלל העולמות בא״ס שהוא יהיה הממוצע והמחבר והמקשר העולמות זה בזה כו׳
And the meaning of “covenant of salt” is that He made a covenant with him that through the service of the offerings he would bind and mix the world, which is all the worlds as a whole (klalus), with the Infinite One (Ein Sof), so that he would be the intermediary that joins and binds the worlds to one another, etc.
The covenant of salt with Aharon is that through the offerings he would bind and blend all the worlds with the Infinite One, serving as the intermediary that joins the worlds to one another.
And this is “He went up the ramp,” etc., up to the western [corner] (ma’aravis), which is the attribute of Aharon, the covenant of salt, which mixes (me’arev) the worlds, etc.
The Mishnah describes the kohen going up the ramp of the altar and around it, corner by corner, ending on the western side (ma’aravis), which hints at me’arev, “mixing,” Aharon’s quality.
והנה הכתיב ברית מלח עולם הוא והקרי היא כי למעלה הוא בהעלם גדול לכך כתיב הוא לשון נסתר אבל למטה כאשר בא תוך הקרי שהוא הדבור ושם הוא התגלות לכן נק׳ היא עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו],
Now, the written form is “an everlasting covenant of salt, hu,” and the reading is hi, for above it is in great concealment, therefore it is written hu, a term of the hidden (nistar); but below, when it comes into the reading, which is speech, there it is revelation; therefore it is called hi.” End of quote.
The text then returns to the written hu and the spoken hi. Above, the covenant is deeply hidden, so the text writes hu, a word that in Hebrew grammar is nistar, “hidden” (the third person). Below, when it comes into speech, the reading, it is revealed, and so it is read hi. Here the Maggid’s words end.
וזהו שבקטורת נאמר ממולח כי הקטרת הוא ענין הקשר והעירוב כו׳.
And this is why of the incense it is said “salted,” for the incense is the matter of binding and mixing, etc.
That is also why the incense is called “salted”: the incense is binding and blending.
Through the offerings Aharon binds the worlds to the Infinite One; the covenant is hidden above (hu) and revealed below in speech (hi).
Marei mekomos
- 1עלה בכבש · זבחים ה, ג.
- 2עלה בכבש · Mishnah Zevachim 5:3
61וביאור ענין שמערב העולמות, כי הנה ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] ביום חתונתו זו1 מתן תורה, וצ״ל מהו פי׳ חתונתו, אך כי חיתון פירושו תערובות כמ״ש בת״י [בתרגום ירושלמי] פ׳ עקב ז׳ ג׳.
The explanation of how he mixes the worlds: our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “‘On the day of his wedding’: this is the Giving of the Torah.” We must understand what “his wedding” means. But chitun (marriage) means mixing, as is written in the Targum Yerushalmi, Parshas Ekev, 7:3.
How does he blend the worlds? The Mishnah (Taanis 26b) reads “on the day of his wedding” (Song of Songs 3:11) as the Giving of the Torah. Chitun, “marriage,” means mixing, the maamar says, citing the Targum Yerushalmi on “you shall not intermarry with them” (Deuteronomy 7:3, a verse in Va’eschanan, though the text names Ekev).
וא״כ פי׳ ביום חתונתו היינו ענין תערובות והתקשרות העולם בא״ס ב״ה ע״י התורה, והוא ע״פ מ״ש ברבות פ׳ וארא פי״ב ע״פ כל אשר חפץ2 ה׳ עשה
If so, the meaning of “on the day of his wedding” is the matter of the mixing and binding of the world with the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, through the Torah. And this is according to what is written in the Rabbos, Parshas Va’era, chapter 12, on the verse “Whatever Havayah desired He did”:
So the “wedding” at Sinai was the blending of the world with the Infinite One through the Torah, as the Midrash on “Whatever Havayah desired He did” (Psalms 135:6) explains.
אמר דוד אע״פ [אף על פי] שגזר הקב״ה השמים שמים לה׳3 כו׳ כשבקש ליתן התורה בטל גזירה ראשונה ואמר התחתונים יעלו לעליונים והעליונים ירדו לתחתונים ואני המתחיל4 שנאמר וירד ה׳ על הר סיני.5
“David said: Although the Holy One, blessed be He, decreed, ‘The heavens are heavens to Havayah,’ etc., when He wished to give the Torah He annulled the first decree and said, ‘The lower ones shall go up to the upper ones, and the upper ones shall go down to the lower ones, and I will be the one who begins,’ as it is said, ‘And Havayah descended upon Mount Sinai.’
G‑d had decreed, “The heavens are heavens to Havayah” (Psalms 115:16), and the earth for man; but when He wished to give the Torah He annulled the decree, so that the lower would go up to the upper and the upper come down to the lower, Himself beginning: “And Havayah descended upon Mount Sinai” (Exodus 19:20).
The Giving of the Torah was a “wedding,” a blending of the upper and lower worlds, which ended the separation between heaven and earth.
Marei mekomos
- 1ביום חתונתו זו מ״ת · Taanit 26b:6–7
- 2כל אשר חפץ ה׳ עשה · Psalms 135:6
- 3השמים שמים לה׳ · Psalms 115:16
- 4כשבקש ליתן התורה בטל גזירה ראשונה ואמר התחתונים יעלו לעליונים והעליונים ירדו לתחתונים ואני המתחיל · Shemot Rabbah 12:3
- 5וירד ה׳ על הר סיני · Exodus 19:20
And it is written, ‘And to Moshe He said: Go up to Havayah.’ Thus, ‘Whatever Havayah desired He did, in the heavens and on the earth.’” End of quote.
And of the lower going up: “And to Moshe He said: Go up to Havayah” (Exodus 24:1). So “whatever Havayah desired He did in the heavens and on the earth.”
ופי׳ ענין ירידה ועלייה יובן ממ״ש במ״א בד״ה ושמתי כדכד2 שמשותיך3 כדין וכדין4 כו׳ ועכ״פ [ועל כל פנים] הוא השתלשלות והמשכת האור מסוכ״ע בממכ״ע [בממלא כל עלמין] וזהו כי כל בשמים ובארץ5 דאחיד בשמיא וארעא כו׳ וזהו ענין ברית מלח עולם.
And the meaning of the descent and ascent will be understood from what is written elsewhere, in the discourse beginning “And I will make your windows of kadkod,” “kedein ukedein,” etc. At any rate, it is the descent (hishtalshelus) and drawing down of the light from the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) into the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin). And this is “For all that is in the heavens and on the earth”: “which holds fast to heaven and earth,” etc. And this is the matter of “an everlasting covenant of salt.”
The descent and ascent are explained in the discourse on “I will make your windows of kadkod” (Likkutei Torah, Re’eh): kadkod is read, as in the Talmud, as “this way and that” (kedein ukedein), both movements together, the lower rising and the upper descending. In essence it is the light that encompasses the worlds drawn into the light that fills them, and this is the “covenant of salt”; so “all that is in heaven and earth” is rendered by the Targum as what “holds fast to heaven and earth.”
The union of upper and lower at Sinai is the drawing of the encompassing light into the filling light, the everlasting covenant of salt that joins heaven and earth.
Marei mekomos
- 1ואל משה אמר עלה אל ה׳ · Exodus 24:1
- 2בד״ה ושמתי כדכד · לקמן פ׳ ראה כו, ד ואילך.
- 3ושמתי כדכד שמשותיך · Isaiah 54:12
- 4כדין וכדין · Bava Batra 75a:9
- 5כי כל בשמים ובארץ · I Chronicles 29:11
63והנה פי׳ ליל שמורים1 הוא ע״ד שמור לנוקבא2 היינו מה שהמקבל ממתין ומצפה ומייחל אל המשפיע כעני הצופה ומביט מתי יתן הבעה״ב [הבעל הבית] לידו מאומה כמ״ש סד״ה זכור את יום השבת3 כו׳ בענין פי׳ שמור כו׳ ע״ש
Now, the meaning of “a night of watching (leil shimurim)” is along the lines of “shamor (guard) is for Nukva (the feminine)”: that is, the recipient waits, anticipates and hopes for the giver, like a poor person who watches and looks [to see] when the householder will put something into his hand, as is written at the end of the discourse beginning “Remember the Shabbos day,” etc., on the meaning of shamor, etc.; see there.
The night of Pesach is called “a night of watching (leil shimurim)” (Exodus 12:42). The Zohar says “shamor is for the feminine”: the receiver waits and longs for the giver, as a poor man watches for the householder to put something in his hand. In Torah Ohr, Yisro, on “Remember the Shabbos day,” the Alter Rebbe reads shamor as “waiting,” as in “and his father kept (shamar) the matter.”
וכך הוא ענין ליל שמורים. אשר בחי׳ ליל הוא מדת החשך וההעלם ונמשך מבחי׳ ממכ״ע [ממלא כל עלמין].
And so is the matter of “a night of watching”: for the level of “night” is the attribute of darkness and concealment, and it is drawn from the level of the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin).
So too the “night of watching”: night is darkness and concealment, which comes from the light that fills the worlds.
The night of Pesach is the receiver’s night of waiting: Malchus, like a poor person, waits for the giver.
Marei mekomos
- 1ליל שימורים · Exodus 12:42
- 2שמור לנוקבא · Zohar I, 48b
- 3סד״ה זכור את יום השבת · תו״א עא, ד.
64ובחי׳ זו היא בחי׳ שמורים ומצפה להמשכת האור מבחי׳ סוכ״ע שהוא בלי גבול. ולכן נאמר שמורים לשון רבים ע״ש [על שם] התחברות משפיע ומקבל כמ״ש בזח״ב [בזהר חלק ב׳] פ׳ בא דל״ח ע״ב
And this level is the level of “watching,” and it anticipates the drawing down of the light from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), which is without limit. Therefore shimurim is said in the plural, on account of the joining of giver and recipient, as is written in the Zohar, Part II, Parshas Bo, folio 38b.
That night waits for the boundless encompassing light. Shimurim is plural because it joins giver and receiver, as the Zohar on Bo says.
ולכן המצה היא דוקא לחם עני כעני הצופה ומביט כו׳ כנ״ל וכן פי׳ בפ׳ ויצא דקנ״ז ע״א בענין לחם עני מאן עני דא דוד מלכא1 דכתיב ביה כי עני ואביון אני.2
Therefore the matzah is specifically “bread of poverty,” like a poor person who watches and looks, etc., as mentioned above. And so it is explained in [the Zohar,] Parshas Vayetzei, folio 157a, concerning “bread of poverty”: “Who is the poor one? This is King David, of whom it is written, ‘For I am poor and needy.’
So matzah must be “bread of poverty,” like the poor man who watches. The Zohar on Vayetzei asks “Who is the poor one?” and answers, “King David,” who said, “For I am poor and needy” (Psalms 86:1); David is Malchus.
The “watching” of Pesach night is Malchus waiting to receive the boundless light; matzah, the bread of the poor, expresses that state.
Marei mekomos
- 1מאן עני דא דוד מלכא · Zohar, Vayetzei 23:200–225
- 2כי עני ואביון אני · Psalms 86:1
65והאי לחם עני אקרי מצה נוקבא בלא דכורא מסכנותא הוי. אתקריבו לגבי מצה בקדמיתא כיון דקריבו לון יתיר עייל לון קב״ה [קודשא בריך הוא] בדרגין אחרנין ואתחבר דכורא בנוקבא וכדין מצה כד אתחברת בדכורא אקרי מצוה בתוספת וא״ו עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו].
And this ‘bread of poverty’ is called matzah: the feminine without the masculine is poverty. They were brought near to matzah at first; once He brought them nearer, the Holy One, blessed be He, brought them into other levels, and the masculine was joined with the feminine; and then matzah, when it is joined with the masculine, is called mitzvah, with the addition of a vav.” End of quote.
The Zohar continues: the “bread of poverty” is matzah, the feminine without the masculine, and so it is poor. At first Israel were brought near to matzah; when brought nearer, G‑d raised them to higher levels and joined masculine with feminine, and then matzah (מצה) gains a vav and becomes mitzvah (מצוה).
Matzah is Malchus alone, poor and receiving; when it is joined with the giver it becomes mitzvah, the vav completing it.
(And see what is written on the matter of the vav in the discourse beginning “The voice is the voice of Yaakov,” and what is written below in the discourse beginning “Six days you shall eat matzos.”)
The parenthesis refers to the discourse on “The voice is the voice of Yaakov,” on the vav (printed in the Siddur, the Kehot note says), and to the discourse below on “Six days you shall eat matzos” (Likkutei Torah, Tzav), which notes that the matzah of the evening is spelled without a vav and the matzos baked after “the King of kings revealed Himself” with one.
וכיון שכן שבחי׳ מצה הוא דוקא לחם עני, שמשתמרת לקבל היחוד ואור העליון מבחי׳ סוכ״ע קודם שנמשך האור. רק הוא בבחי׳ שמור לנוק׳ [לנוקבא], ולכן נוהגין שלא ליתן מלח במצה, שבחי׳ ברית מלח עולם זהו כאשר כבר נמשך האור ונעשה בחי׳ תערובות וזהו ע״י אהרן שושבינא דמטרוניתא כו׳,
And since this is so, that the level of matzah is specifically “bread of poverty,” which waits to receive the union and the supernal light from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), before the light has been drawn down, and it is only in the state of “shamor for Nukva,” therefore the custom is not to put salt in matzah. For the level of “an everlasting covenant of salt” is when the light has already been drawn down and a state of mixing has come about, and this is through Aharon, the groomsman of the Queen, etc.
Since matzah, “bread of poverty,” is the state of waiting (mishtameres, from the root of shamor) to receive the union and the encompassing light before it has been drawn down, still only “shamor for the feminine,” the custom is not to salt it. The “everlasting covenant of salt” belongs to the stage after the light has been drawn down and the worlds have been blended, through Aharon, the groomsman of the Queen.
ומ״ש בדוד ברית מלח עולם5 זהו לאחר שרימם הקב״ה מלכותו ונמשך האור מבחי׳ סוכ״ע בממכ״ע [בממלא כל עלמין] וכמ״ש דוד ארוממך אלקי המלך6 כו׳, אבל בבחי׳ מצה לחם עני א״צ [אין צריך / אינו צריך] ליתן מלח כו׳.
And what is said regarding David, “an everlasting covenant of salt,” is after the Holy One, blessed be He, exalted his kingship and the light was drawn from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds into the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin), as David said, “I will exalt You, my G‑d the King,” etc. But at the level of matzah, “bread of poverty,” there is no need to put salt, etc.
The covenant of salt with David, too, came after G‑d exalted his kingship and drew the encompassing light into the filling light, as David says, “I will exalt You, my G‑d the King” (Psalms 145:1). At the stage of matzah, poverty, no salt is needed.
ומזה יובן איך מנהג ישראל תורה,7 ואח״כ בקרבנות שהוא ענין הקירוב והיחוד של המדרגות דממכ״ע [דממלא כל עלמין] וסוכ״ע8 בא המצוה ולא תשבית מלח9 כו׳ כדי להיות התקשרות והתחברות כו׳:
From this one will understand how “the custom of Israel is Torah.” And afterwards, with the offerings, which are the matter of the drawing near and the union of the levels of the light that fills all worlds and the light that encompasses all worlds, comes the mitzvah “And you shall not omit the salt,” etc., so that there be a binding and joining, etc.
This shows how “the custom of Israel is Torah”: the custom of unsalted matzah reflects this inner order. Afterwards, with the offerings (korbanos, from karov, “near”), which bring together the filling and encompassing lights, comes the command “do not omit the salt,” to bind and join them.
The custom not to salt matzah is explained: matzah is the waiting stage before the light is drawn down, while salt, the covenant of blending, belongs to the offerings, which join the encompassing and filling lights.
The Kehot note gathers sources for “the custom of Israel is Torah”: the Jerusalem Talmud, Pesachim 4:1; Tosafos on Menachos 20b (“the custom of our fathers”); Minhagim Yeshanim MiDura; and the Maharil, cited by the Rema in Yoreh De’ah 376:4. The discourse “A man, when he brings near of you” explains that through the arousal from below in the offerings, an arousal from above is drawn down, the “pleasing fragrance to Havayah.”
Marei mekomos
- 1בד״ה הקל קול יעקב · סידור שער התפלה. אוה״ת בראשית כרך ד.
- 2הקל קול יעקב · Genesis 27:22
- 3לקמן בד״ה ששת ימים תאכל מצות · פ׳ צו יג, ב.
- 4ששת ימים תאכל מצות · Deuteronomy 16:8
- 5ומ״ש בדוד ברית מלח עולם · ראה דברי הימים-ב יג, ה.
- 6ארוממך אלקי המלך · Psalms 145:1
- 7מנהג ישראל תורה · Menachot 20b
- 8בקרבנות שהוא ענין הקירוב והיחוד של המדרגות דממכ״ע וסוכ״ע · רבינו בחיי תחלת פ׳ ויקרא. ראה לעיל ב, ב. אגה״ק סי׳ כח. אוה״ת פנחס א׳פז.
- 9ולא תשבית מלח · Leviticus 2:13
The sailors and the Splitting of the Sea ¶67–71
67י ועפ״ז [ועל פי זה] י״ל [יש לומר] ג״כ מה שפרש״י [שפירש רש״י / שפירוש רש״י] שהספנים נקראו מלחים1 ע״ש [על שם] שמהפכין את המים במשוטות כשמנהיגין את הספינה כו׳,
10. According to this, one may also explain what Rashi explained, that sailors are called malachim because they turn over the water with oars when they steer the ship, etc.
Section 10 returns to Rashi’s explanation that sailors are called malachim because they stir the water with their oars as they steer the ship.
דהנה כתיב כה אמר ה׳ הנותן בים דרך2 (בישעי׳ [בישעיה] סי׳ מ״ג י״ו) פי׳ כי ים עלמא דאתכסיא והקב״ה נותן בו דרך שיוכלו הנשמות לעלות שם.
For it is written, “Thus says Havayah, who makes a way in the sea” (in Isaiah, chapter 43, [verse] 16). The meaning is that the sea is the hidden world (alma de’iskasya), and the Holy One, blessed be He, makes a way in it, so that the souls can ascend there.
Isaiah speaks of G‑d “who makes a way in the sea” (43:16). The sea is “the hidden world,” the realm of concealed G‑dliness, and G‑d makes a way in it so that souls can rise there.
והיינו ע״י הספינות שהם הלבושים של תומ״צ [תורה ומצות] שבהן ועל ידן מתעלים בים היינו העלייה מבי״ע לאצי׳ כמ״ש בבה״ז [בביאורי הזהר] פ׳ בשלח דס״ז ע״א שיש נשמות הנק׳ נוני ימא וע״ד מן המים משיתיהו3 שהם בעצם מעלמא דאתכסיא נשמות דאצילות
That is, through the ships, which are the garments of Torah and mitzvos, in which and through which they ascend in the sea, that is, the ascent from Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah to Atzilus; as is written in Biurei HaZohar, Parshas Beshalach, folio 67a, that there are souls called “fish of the sea,” along the lines of “for I drew him out of the water,” which are in essence from the hidden world, souls of Atzilus.
The souls travel in “ships,” the garments of Torah and mitzvos, which carry them up from the lower worlds to Atzilus. Biurei HaZohar, a Chassidic commentary on the Zohar, speaks of souls called “fish of the sea,” as in “I drew him out of the water” (Exodus 2:10), which belong by nature to the hidden world; they are souls of Atzilus.
אכן נשמות דבי״ע שהם מיבשה מעלמא דאתגליא לא יוכלו לעלות בים כ״א ע״י הלבושים שהם הנק׳ ארבין, שם אניות יהלכון4 כו׳
But souls of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, which are from the dry land, from the revealed world (alma de’isgalya), cannot ascend in the sea except through the garments, which are called “boats” (arvin): “There ships go,” etc.
Souls of the lower worlds come from “dry land,” the revealed world, and can travel the sea only in “boats,” the garments: “There ships go” (Psalms 104:26).
וע״ש דס״ט ע״ג [עמוד ג׳] שזהו ע״ד ויבא משה בתוך הענן5 כו׳ ועמ״ש מזה בתו״א [בתורה אור] פ׳ חיי שרה.
And see there, folio 69, column c, that this is along the lines of “And Moshe came into the midst of the cloud,” etc. And see what is written about this in Torah Ohr, Parshas Chayei Sarah.
Biurei HaZohar compares this to “Moshe came into the midst of the cloud” (Exodus 24:18): one enters the hidden only within a covering. The text also refers to Torah Ohr on Chayei Sarah.
ועוד יש פי׳ הנותן בים שהוא מל׳ דרך שממשיך בו ההמשכה מלמעלה היינו ע״י יסוד ז״א שממשיך בו מחב״ד [מחכמה בינה ודעת] שבחכמה מלובש אור א״ס ב״ה
There is another explanation of “who makes in the sea”: [the sea] is Malchus, [and] “a way” is that He draws into it the flow from above, that is, through the Yesod of Z’eir Anpin, which draws into it from Chochmah, Binah and Daas; for in Chochmah the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, is enclothed.
A second reading: the “sea” is Malchus, and the “way” in it is the flow drawn into it from above through Yesod of Z’eir Anpin, which draws from Chochmah, Binah and Daas; and in Chochmah the Infinite Light is clothed.
(וכמ״ש מזה בזח״א [בזהר חלק א] בראשי׳ [בראשית] כ״ט סע״ב [סוף עמוד ב] מקץ קצ״ז ע״ב תרומה קל״ז סע״א [סוף עמוד א] ובסה״מ [ובספר הדרת מלך] סי׳ קי״ד קט״ו).6
(As is written about this in the Zohar, Part I, Bereishis, [folio] 29, end of side b; Miketz, 197b; Terumah, 137, end of side a; and in Sefer Hadras Melech, sections 114 [and] 115.)
The parenthesis gives the Zohar passages and Sefer Hadras Melech as sources for this reading.
וזהו משרז״ל [משרבותינו זכרונם לברכה] ברבות קדושי׳ [קדושים] פכ״ה ע״פ אחרי ה׳ אלהיכם תלכו7 וכי אפשר לב״ו [לבשר ודם] להלך אחר הקב״ה8 אותו שכתוב בו בים דרכך9 כו׳ אלא כו׳ ויטע ה׳ אלקים גן בעדן אף אתם כו׳ ע״ש,
And this is what our Sages, of blessed memory, said in the Rabbos, Kedoshim, chapter 25, on the verse “After Havayah your G‑d you shall walk”: “Is it then possible for flesh and blood to walk after the Holy One, blessed be He, of whom it is written, ‘Your way is in the sea,’ etc.? Rather,” etc., “‘And Havayah G‑d planted a garden in Eden’: you too,” etc.; see there.
The Midrash on “After Havayah your G‑d you shall walk” (Deuteronomy 13:5) asks how a person can walk after G‑d, of whom it says “Your way is in the sea” (Psalms 77:20), and answers from “And Havayah G‑d planted a garden in Eden”: you too should plant.
והמכוון כי התו׳ [התורה] נק׳ עץ חיים ונק׳ גן היינו ג״ן סדרים דאורייתא וכן המצות הם עצי הגן והפרדס (ברבות פ׳ כי תצא).
The intent is that the Torah is called “a tree of life” and is called gan (garden), that is, the fifty-three (gan) portions of the Torah; and likewise the mitzvos are the trees of the garden and the orchard (in the Rabbos, Parshas Ki Seitzei).
The Torah is called “a tree of life” and “a garden” (gan, ג״ן, the value 53, the number of the Torah’s weekly portions), and the mitzvos are the trees of the garden.
וע״י קיום התומ״צ [התורה ומצות] יבואו לבחי׳ ומדרגת אחרי ה׳ אלקיכם תלכו מ״ש בו בים דרכך וכן הם יעלו עי״ז להיות להם דרך בים הנ״ל ועז״נ [ועל זה נאמר] דרכיה דרכי נועם כו׳ (משלי ג׳ י״ז)
And through fulfilling Torah and mitzvos they will come to the level and rank of “After Havayah your G‑d you shall walk,” of whom it is written, “Your way is in the sea”; and likewise through this they will ascend, so that there be for them a way in the sea mentioned above. And of this it is said, “Its ways are ways of pleasantness,” etc. (Proverbs 3:17).
By keeping Torah and mitzvos one comes to “walk after” G‑d, whose “way is in the sea,” and one also gains a way through that sea. So it says of the Torah, “Its ways are ways of pleasantness” (Proverbs 3:17).
וזהו ושמרו דרך10 הוי׳ עמ״ש ע״ז בת״א [בתורה אור] פ׳ בשלח בד״ה אשירה להוי׳11 ובד״ה מהלכים בין העומדים בענין אם בדרכי תלך12 כו׳.
And this is “And they shall keep the way of Havayah”; see what is written about this in Torah Ohr, Parshas Beshalach, in the discourse beginning “I will sing to Havayah,” and in the discourse beginning “Walkers among those who stand,” on the matter of “If you walk in My ways,” etc.
This is “they shall keep the way of Havayah” (Genesis 18:19), as explained in Torah Ohr in the discourses on “I will sing to Havayah” and “Walkers among those who stand” (Zechariah 3:7).
אך הספינות והלבושים הנ״ל צריכים עוד לבחי׳ מלחים המנהיגים אותם בים וכמ״ש בזח״ב [בזהר חלק ב׳] מ״ח ב׳ בענין דאתי חד דברא בימא13 כו׳,
But the ships and garments mentioned above still need the level of sailors (malachim) who steer them in the sea, as is written in the Zohar, Part II, [folio] 48b, concerning “one comes who steers in the sea,” etc.,
Yet the ships, the garments, still need “sailors” to steer them, as the Zohar says of “one who steers in the sea.”
שהוא דוקא הנותן בים דרך ע״י שממשיך בו האור והשפע מאור א״ס ב״ה כנ״ל וממתיק גבורות הגלים של הים אזי דוקא יוכלו הספינות לילך בו.14151617
which is specifically “who makes a way in the sea,” through drawing into it the light and flow from the Infinite Light, blessed be He, as mentioned above, and sweetening the severities (Gevuros) of the waves of the sea; only then can the ships travel in it.
That steering is G‑d “making a way in the sea”: drawing in the flow of the Infinite Light and sweetening the severity of the waves. Only then can the ships sail.
The image of sailing is developed: the sea is the hidden world, the ships are the garments of Torah and mitzvos in which souls rise through it, and the “sailors” are the divine flow that calms its waves and makes a way.
A Kehot note quotes the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah: sailors are called malachim, as in “the sailors were afraid,” in the sense of “salt in the sea,” which sweetens the judgments of the sea. Another note quotes Sefer Hadras Melech, cited in the Tzemach Tzedek’s Yahel Or: “Your way is in the sea” is through Yesod of Z’eir Anpin, and “Your path in many waters” is the union of Abba and Imma.
Marei mekomos
- 1שהספנים נקראו מלחים · מובא באוה״ת ויקרא-ד ע׳ א׳סב ”ולכן נק׳ הספנים מלחים כמ״ש ביונה סי׳ א׳ ה׳ וייראו המלחים כו׳ וזהו ע״ד מלחא בימא שממתיק דיני הים כו׳ כנ״ל, ועמ״ש מזה בהביאור ע״פ ולא תשבית” ע״ש.
- 2הנותן בים דרך · Isaiah 43:16
- 3מן המים משיתיהו · Exodus 2:10
- 4שם אניות יהלכון · Psalms 104:26
- 5ויבא משה בתוך הענן · Exodus 24:18
- 6ובסה״מ סי׳ קי״ד קט״ו · ”פי׳ בים דרכך היינו ע״י יסוד ז״א שע״ז נאמר הנותן בים דרך כו׳ ושבילך במים רבים יחוד או״א” — יהל אור ע׳ רעא, ע״ש.
- 7אחרי ה׳ אלהיכם תלכו · Deuteronomy 13:5
- 8וכי אפשר לב״ו להלך אחר הקב״ה · Vayikra Rabbah 25:3
- 9בים דרכך · Psalms 77:20
- 10ושמרו דרך הוי׳ · Genesis 18:19
- 11אשירה להוי׳ · Exodus 15:1
- 12אם בדרכי תלך · Zechariah 3:7
- 13דאתי חד דברא בימא · Zohar, Beshalach 10:95–105
- 14ברבות קדושים פכ״ה · ראה גם יהל אור ע׳ רעא.
- 15ויטע ה״א גן בעדן · Genesis 2:8
- 16התורה נקרא עץ חיים · ראה תנחומא מצורע ב. ועוד.
- 17
68וע״ז רמזו רז״ל [רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] בירושלמי פ״ב [פרק ב׳] דשבת וברבות פ׳ בראשית פ״ו בחקתי פל״ה הנותן בים דרך מן העצרת ועד1 החג,
And to this our Sages, of blessed memory, alluded in the Jerusalem Talmud, chapter 2 of Shabbos, and in the Rabbos, Parshas Bereishis, chapter 6, [and] Bechukosai, chapter 35: “‘Who makes a way in the sea’: from Atzeres until the Festival,”
The Sages hinted at this in the Jerusalem Talmud and the Midrash: “who makes a way in the sea” refers to the season from Atzeres (Shavuos) until the Festival (Sukkos), when ships can sail.
והיינו ע״י שאזי נמשך דרך הוי׳, כי בעצרת הוא מתן תורה כו׳ ועי״ז נעשה בים דרך כו׳
that is, because then “the way of Havayah” is drawn down; for on Atzeres is the Giving of the Torah, etc., and through this a way is made in the sea, etc.
Then “the way of Havayah” is drawn down, since the Torah was given on Shavuos, and through the Torah a way is made in the sea.
ובעבודה זהו ע״ד מארז״ל [מאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] מצות צריכות כוונה, והיינו כמארז״ל [כמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שיקבל עליו עול מלכות שמים תחלה2 ואח״כ יקבל עליו עול מצות.
And in divine service, this is along the lines of the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, “Mitzvos require intention”; that is, as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “that he should accept upon himself the yoke of the kingdom of heaven first, and afterwards accept upon himself the yoke of the mitzvos.”
In a person’s service this matches “mitzvos require intention,” and the Mishnah’s order of the Shema: first accept the yoke of the kingdom of heaven, then the yoke of the mitzvos.
עול מלכות שמים ע״י ק״ש [קריאת שמע] למס״נ [למסירות נפש] באחד, עי״ז ממשיך דרך הוי׳ בבחי׳ ים מלמעלה למטה, כי ים דומה לרקיע3 כו׳ לכסה״כ [לכסא הכבוד] כו׳4 שזמנה משיכיר בין תכלת ללבן.5
The yoke of the kingdom of heaven [is accepted] through the Shema, to give over one’s soul in “One”; through this one draws “the way of Havayah” into the level of “sea,” from above to below. For “the sea resembles the sky,” etc., “the Throne of Glory,” etc.; and [the Shema’s] time is “from when one can distinguish between blue (techeles) and white,”
The yoke of heaven is accepted in the Shema, giving one’s soul at “One”; this draws “the way of Havayah” into the “sea” from above. The Shema’s time begins when one can tell techeles from white, and techeles resembles the sea, which resembles the sky.
The way through the sea is made by the Torah given on Shavuos, and in a person’s service by accepting the yoke of heaven in the Shema before taking on the mitzvos.
A Kehot note records that in the Tzemach Tzedek’s manuscript (Buch 1122), the passage from “through this” to “the Throne of Glory” is marked for deletion.
Marei mekomos
- 1
- 2שיקבל עליו עול מלכות שמים תחלה · Berakhot 13a:21
- 3ים דומה לרקיע · Chullin 89a:3–4
- 4עי״ז . . לכסה״כ כו׳ · בבוך 1122 גוכי״ק כ״ק אדמו״ר הצ״צ לקטע זה יש סימן למחיקה.
- 5משיכיר בין תכלת ללבן · Berakhot 9b:9
69ותכלת דומה לים כו׳ לכסה״כ [לכסא הכבוד] אשר עי״ז ממשיך הנותן בים דרך מלמעלה למטה, וכמ״ש בים דרכך ושבילך1 כו׳
and “techeles resembles the sea,” etc., “the Throne of Glory,” through which one draws down “who makes a way in the sea” from above to below; and as it is written, “Your way is in the sea, and Your path,” etc.
The sky in turn resembles the Throne of Glory. Through this the way is drawn into the sea from above: “Your way is in the sea, and Your path” (Psalms 77:20).
ואח״כ יקבל עליו עומ״צ [עול מצוות] שאזי ע״י המצות שהם הארבין2 דהיינו האניות יוכלו גם הנשמות להיות להם דרך בים כו׳.
And afterwards he should accept upon himself the yoke of the mitzvos; for then, through the mitzvos, which are the “boats,” that is, the ships, the souls too can have a way in the sea, etc.
Afterwards a person accepts the yoke of the mitzvos. The mitzvos are the “boats,” the ships in which souls too can find a way through the sea.
Accepting the yoke of heaven opens a way into the sea from above, and the mitzvos are the boats by which souls travel it from below.
Marei mekomos
- 1בים דרכך ושבילך · Psalms 77:20
- 2ע״י המצות שהם הארבין · מובא ביהל אור ע׳ תז.
70וע״כ נק׳ הספנים מלחים ופרש״י [ופירש רש״י / ופירוש רש״י] שהוא ג״כ לשון תערובות שמהפכין את המים כו׳, ויש לפרש שהתערובות הוא שממשיכים דרך בים מלמעלה למטה להיות בים דרכך
Therefore sailors are called malachim, and Rashi explained that this too is a term of mixing, in that they turn over the water, etc. One may explain that the mixing is that they draw a way into the sea from above to below, so that there be “Your way is in the sea,”
So sailors are malachim, “mixers,” as Rashi says, because they stir the water. The “mixing” is the way they draw into the sea from above, so that “Your way is in the sea.”
וכן מלמטה למעלה שיוכלו אנשי היבשה שמעלמא דאתגליא להתעלות למעלה להיות להם השגה בעלמא דאתכסיא,
and likewise from below to above, so that the people of the dry land, who are from the revealed world, can ascend upward, to have comprehension of the hidden world.
They also draw from below upward, so that people of the “dry land,” the revealed world, can rise to comprehend the hidden world.
אך קי״ס [קריעת ים סוף] הוא בחי׳ עליונה יותר שהים נעשה בו דרך יבשה ממש ואזי א״צ [אין צריך / אינו צריך] לארבין,
But the Splitting of the Sea of Reeds is a higher level, in which a way of actual dry land was made in the sea, and then there is no need for boats;
The Splitting of the Sea was higher still: a way of actual dry land was made in the sea, so no boats were needed.
וע״ד מ״ש במ״א ע״פ צאינה וראינה1 כו׳ צאינה מן הלבושים והיינו ע״י גילוי. בעטרה שעטרה לו אמו2 היינו אור הכתר שעי״ז הפך ים שהוא עלמא דאתכסיא להיות עלמא דאתגליא ממש
along the lines of what is written elsewhere on the verse “Go out and see,” etc.: “Go out” from the garments, and this is through revelation, “with the crown with which his mother crowned him”: that is, the light of Keser, through which He turned the sea, which is the hidden world, into the actual revealed world;
The discourse on “Go out and see” reads it as “go out” of the garments, through revelation: “the crown with which his mother crowned him” (Song of Songs 3:11), the light of Keser, which turned the sea, the hidden world, into the revealed world. In Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim, the Alter Rebbe explains this crown as the supernal will, the encompassing Infinite Light itself, the “crown of Torah.”
ואזי א״צ [אין צריך / אינו צריך] ללבושין הנק׳ ארבין שמפסיקין בין האדם לים החכמה שלא ניתן ליהנות מים החכמה כ״א ע״י לבוש ומשל החוצץ בינו ובין ים החכמה ע״ד ויבא משה בתוך הענן3 כו׳,
and then there is no need for the garments called “boats,” which interpose between a person and the sea of wisdom. For it is not given to benefit from the sea of wisdom except through a garment and parable that separates between him and the sea of wisdom, along the lines of “And Moshe came into the midst of the cloud,” etc.
Then the “boats” are not needed. Normally one can benefit from the “sea of wisdom” only through a garment or parable that stands between, as Moshe entered within the cloud.
אבל כאשר הפך ים ליבשה4 ממש לא יצטרך כלל ללבוש ומשל כ״א יהיה בו דרך כמו ביבשה ועז״נ [ועל זה נאמר] ובנ״י [ובני ישראל] הלכו ביבשה בתוך הים כו׳.
But once He has turned the sea into actual dry land, there will be no need at all for a garment and parable; rather, there will be a way in it as on dry land. And of this it is said, “And the children of Israel walked on dry land in the midst of the sea,” etc.
When the sea becomes dry land no garment or parable is needed; there is a way through it as on land: “And the children of Israel walked on dry land in the midst of the sea.”
Sailing through the sea in boats is service through garments; the Splitting of the Sea, by the light of Keser, is a higher revelation in which the hidden becomes as plain as dry land.
The Likkutei Torah discourse on “Go out and see” explains the crown as the supernal will, the encompassing light, the “crown of Torah,” higher than “bread and wine”; it is the revelation of the encompassing Infinite Light that will shine in the future, when “the righteous sit with their crowns on their heads.”
Marei mekomos
- 1ע״פ צאינה וראינה · ראה לקו״ת שה״ש כו, ג.
- 2בעטרה שעטרה לו אמו · Song of Songs 3:11
- 3ויבא משה בתוך הענן · Exodus 24:18
- 4הפך ים ליבשה · Psalms 66:6
71וזהו ששת ימים תאכל מצות1 וביום השביעי עצרת לה׳ אלקיך. פי׳ מצות בוא״ו זהו כשנמשך בבחי׳ מצה דלא מליח כו׳ בחי׳ וא״ו ונעשית בחי׳ מצוה,
And this is [the meaning of] “Six days you shall eat matzos, and on the seventh day [shall be] an assembly (atzeres) to Havayah your G‑d.” The explanation: matzos [is written] with a vav; this is when there is drawn into the level of matzah, which is unsalted, etc., the level of the vav, and it becomes the level of mitzvah.
The maamar closes with the verse “Six days you shall eat matzos, and on the seventh day an assembly to Havayah your G‑d” (Deuteronomy 16:8). Here matzos is spelled with a vav, hinting that the unsalted matzah, the “bread of poverty,” receives the vav and so becomes mitzvah (מצוה), as the Zohar said above.
ועי״ז אח״כ וביום השביעי נמשך בחי׳ עליונה יותר להיות הפך ים ליבשה,2
And through this, afterwards, “on the seventh day,” a yet higher level is drawn down, to be “He turned the sea into dry land.”
After that, on the seventh day of Pesach, a still higher light is drawn down: the Splitting of the Sea, when “He turned the sea into dry land.”
וזהו ענין עצרת להוי׳ אלקיך ע״ד אחרי הוי׳ אלקיכם ממש תלכו מ״ש בו בים דרכך3 וא״צ [ואין צריך / ואינו צריך] ללבושים כו׳. והיינו כדפרש״י [כדפירש רש״י / כדפירוש רש״י] ע״פ הנותן בים דרך4 דקאי על קריעת ים סוף:
And this is the matter of “an assembly to Havayah your G‑d,” along the lines of “After Havayah your G‑d” Himself “you shall walk,” of whom it is written, “Your way is in the sea,” and there is no need for garments, etc. And this is as Rashi explained on the verse “who makes a way in the sea,” that it refers to the Splitting of the Sea of Reeds.
That is “an assembly to Havayah your G‑d”: walking after G‑d Himself, whose “way is in the sea,” with no need for garments. Rashi explains “who makes a way in the sea” as the Splitting of the Sea of Reeds.
The maamar ends by mapping Pesach onto its themes: the six days of matzah are the receiving stage completed by the vav, and the seventh day, the Splitting of the Sea, is the higher revelation in which the hidden becomes as open as dry land.
Marei mekomos
- 1ששת ימים תאכל מצות . . עצרת לה״א · Deuteronomy 16:8
- 2הפך ים ליבשה · Psalms 66:6
- 3בים דרכך · Psalms 77:20
- 4הנותן בים דרך · Rashi on Isaiah 43:16
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
Each Rosh Chodesh the names of those learning here are brought to the Ohel. Add your name, and mark what you learn so it is counted.
In one’s avodah
Before studying Torah, a person should read the Shema and pray with readiness to give his soul in “One,” so that his heart truly wants to be nullified to G‑d; then even study in which he feels nothing unites his soul with G‑d. He should study for the sake of the Torah itself, give part of his study to Scripture, the Aggados and the inner Torah, and add the “salt” of fear of Heaven to his learning. Service begins with simple faith and the yoke of heaven, the “bread of poverty,” and only then rises to understanding.
Questions for discussion
- Why does the maamar insist that intellect is only a vessel for the soul, and how does that make Torah study a form of self-sacrifice?
- How can studying a practical law about physical things unite a person more fully with G‑d than studying the higher worlds in Kabbalah?
- What does the image of salt, which has no taste of its own yet gives taste to meat, teach about the place of the inner Torah and of fear of Heaven in one’s learning?
- Why must the matzah of Pesach be the unsalted “bread of poverty,” and what does this say about where divine service begins?
- What do the ships, the sailors and the Splitting of the Sea represent in a person’s service of G‑d?
Key terms in this maamar
- The Sefirosספירות
- The ten divine attributes through which G‑d relates to creation.
- The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
- The soul that is 'a part of G‑d above'. ×5
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×73
- Willרצון
- Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect. ×2
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×6
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence.
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d. ×6
- Daas (knowledge)דעת
- Deep connection to an idea, bridging intellect and emotion. ×12
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×3
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one. ×4
- The intellect (mochin)מוחין
- Chochmah, Binah and Daas as a whole. ×1
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- Self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh)מסירות נפש
- Giving oneself over entirely to G‑d.
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d. ×14
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence. ×7
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of the angels and emotions. ×3
- The light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin)סובב כל עלמין
- Divine light too great to enter the worlds; it 'surrounds' them and affects them from beyond.
- The kav (line of light)קו
- The thin ray of light drawn into the space left after the tzimtzum. ×14
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×10
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- Kingship: the level through which G‑d's word creates and rules the worlds. ×3
- Tzimtzum (contraction)צמצום
- The self-concealment of the Infinite Light that makes room for finite worlds. ×1
- The animal soulנפש הבהמית
- The soul that animates the body and its drives. ×6
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The innermost core of a level. ×11
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×3
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving. ×1
- The light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin)ממלא כל עלמין
- Divine light that enters each world and gives it life according to its measure.
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- G‑d as concealed within nature, measuring and limiting. ×8
- Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
- The forces of concealment that oppose holiness. ×1
- Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
- Measure, limitation and judgment. ×3
- Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
- Harmony of kindness and restraint; associated with compassion. ×2
- The lower unity (yichuda tata'ah)יחודא תתאה
- G‑d is present within the world's existence.
- The higher unity (yichuda ila'ah)יחודא עילאה
- The world is nothing next to G‑d.
- The general and collective expression (klalus)כללות
- That which encompasses the particulars as one: their general and collective expression (the klal, as against the prat). Never “sum”, “sum total”, “totality” or “general principle”, as if the particulars were added up (וכללותן היא מצות הצדקה is “their general and collective expression is the mitzvah of charity”). Render by sense: “their general and collective expression”, “that which encompasses them all”, “X in general”, “X as a whole”. Keep התכללות as “inclusion” / “inter-inclusion”.
- Nukva (the feminine / Malchus)נוקבא
- Malchus as the receiving configuration. ×3
- Yesod (foundation)יסוד
- The channel that connects and transmits. ×1
- Accepting the yoke (kabbalas ol)קבלת עול
- Submission to G‑d's will beyond understanding.