Likkutei Torah · Parshas Bechukosai · Maamar 2
ביאור אם בחקותי
An Explanation of “If You Walk in My Statutes”
Biur · an explanation of maamar 1Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
Like the Torah, every soul has written letters, which clothe it as ink clothes parchment, and engraved letters, one with their source as an engraving is one with a gem. “If you walk in My statutes (bechukosai)” is G‑d’s plea that the soul’s boundless ascent in prayer go through its engraved root, the Patriarchs’ attributes in Keser, and that the mitzvos keep its light.
The maamar in brief
Explaining the root of the preceding discourse, the maamar asks why the “walking” must be “in My statutes,” read as engravings. Ink letters only clothe the parchment and remain a thing apart; letters engraved in a gem belong to its very body, though they are not its simple essence. In the soul, thought and speech are written letters, garments, while the form of the twenty-two letters, rooted in the hidden intellect and will, is engraved. Above, the Sefiros of Atzilus, with their revealed vessels, are writing; Keser, Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin, is the Zohar’s “He engraved engravings in the supernal brightness,” beyond even Moshe’s Chochmah, as the answer about Rabbi Akiva shows. So the Written Torah was clothed in the letters of Binah, while the Tablets, given on Shavuos when Keser shines, were engraved. The souls of Israel too have an engraved root “beyond the River,” in the Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin, and a written descent to refine the sparks. Their essential love, above knowledge, comes from that root: “walking” is its boundless ascent in prayer, and “keeping My commandments” draws its light into the vessels of the mitzvos.
Outline
- Writing and engraving: the analogyWhy the “walking” is “in My statutes”: ink letters clothe the parchment and stay a separate thing, while engraved letters belong to the stone itself; in the soul, the letters of thought and speech are such garments, foreign to it yet joined to it.¶1–7
- Engraved letters in the soulHigher thought holds letters absorbed in the concept, yet the analogy falls short; truer still, the form of the twenty-two letters, rooted in the hidden intellect and will, as Iggeres HaKodesh explains, is engraved, while the breath of speech is its writing.¶8–14
- Engraving Above: KeserG‑d’s letters of speech and thought are garments; the Zohar’s “He engraved engravings” is Keser, Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin, the Arizal’s intermediary, united with the Infinite Light. Moshe’s question about Rabbi Akiva shows how far it is above Atzilus, whose revealed vessels are like ink.¶15–22
- The Written Torah and the TabletsThe Torah, from Chochmah, was clothed in the letters of Binah; the Tablets, from Keser revealed on Shavuos, were engraved, and their 620 letters equal Keser.¶23–24
- The soul’s root beyond the RiverWhy “it is pure” precedes “You created it”: Yehoshua’s “beyond the River” is Israel’s root in hidden thought, the Patriarchs’ root in the Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin, drawn down through Atzilus to refine the sparks; an engraved root and a written descent.¶25–30
- Walking in My statutesThe soul’s essential love, above knowledge, comes from its root; walking through the three engravings has no limit, every soul will reach its root, above all in the days of Moshiach, and “If” is G‑d’s plea that the walking be in these alone.¶31–32
- Keeping My commandmentsThe mitzvos are vessels, the “diverse vessels” for the royal wine; a mitzvah joins the light to us; running and returning; the land’s produce and the tree’s fruit; each day’s prayer as the general intention, the blessing over each mitzvah as the particular.¶33–36
Key concepts
- Letters of writing (osiyos hakesivah)אותיות הכתיבה
- Letters written in ink, a thing apart from the parchment, joined to it only as a garment: the model for thought and speech, for the Sefiros of Atzilus with their vessels, for the Written Torah and for the soul’s descent through the worlds.
- Letters of engraving (osiyos hachakikah)אותיות החקיקה
- Letters cut into a stone, adding nothing foreign to it: the model for the form of the letters in the soul’s essence, for Keser, for the Tablets and for the soul’s root. The maamar reads bechukosai, “My statutes,” as engravings.
- The supernal brightness (tehiru ila’ah)טהירו עילאה
- The radiance of the Infinite Light in which, the Zohar says, G‑d first “engraved engravings,” the coming into being of Keser. The word tehorah, “pure,” in the morning blessing over the soul alludes to it.
- Keser as intermediaryממוצע
- Following the Arizal, Keser has two levels: Atik Yomin, which holds the lowest level of the Infinite One, and Arich Anpin, the hidden root of the Sefiros. Together they stand between the Emanator and the emanated; its hidden Chochmah is beyond the Chochmah of Atzilus.
- Beyond the Riverבעבר הנהר
- Above Binah, “the river going out of Eden”: the root of the Patriarchs and of Israel’s souls in the Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin, from which they were led down “through all the land of Canaan.”
- Very (me’od)מאד
- Without limit, at the level of the Infinite One: the walking of love “with all your might,” growing day by day, which every soul will reach and which will be revealed in the days of Moshiach.
- Mitzvah as joining (tzavta)צוותא
- The mitzvos are the vessels that hold the light drawn down from Keser, as a vessel holds wine and a wick holds a flame; when the light enters the vessel it is joined to us.
Writing and engraving: the analogy ¶1–7
1ביאור אם בחקותי
An explanation of “If [you walk] in My statutes.”
The heading marks what follows as an explanation (biur) of the preceding discourse on the opening verse of the parsha, “If you walk in My statutes and keep My commandments” (Leviticus 26:3). It goes back over the same themes and explains their roots.
The heading introduces a fuller explanation of the preceding discourse on “If you walk in My statutes.”
2להבין שרש הדברים הנ״ל. הנה להבין ענין אם בחקותי תלכו שבחי׳ ההליכה היא בחקותי דוקא בבחי׳ אותיות החקיקה.
To understand the root of the matters mentioned above. Now, to understand the meaning of “If you walk in My statutes” (bechukosai): that the level of “walking” is specifically “in My statutes,” at the level of the letters of engraving (chakikah).
The discourse sets out to explain the roots of what the preceding discourse said. Its central claim is that the “walking” of the verse comes specifically through “My statutes” (bechukosai), a word the Alter Rebbe connects with chakikah, engraving, so that it points to letters that are engraved rather than written.
יש להקדים תחלה שרש ענין ההפרש בין תורה שבכתב שנתלבשה באותיות הכתב בדיו על הקלף. לבחי׳ מכתב אלהים חרות על הלוחות שהוא אותיות החקיקה.12
We must first set out the root of the difference between the Written Torah, which is clothed in the letters of writing, in ink on parchment, and the level of “the writing of G‑d, engraved upon the Tablets,” which is the letters of engraving.
Before explaining the verse he lays a foundation: the difference between the Written Torah, whose letters are written in ink on parchment, and the Ten Commandments on the Tablets, which Scripture calls “the writing of G‑d, engraved upon the Tablets.” Written letters and engraved letters will be the two models for everything that follows.
The paragraph states the theme: to understand why the walking is “in My statutes,” one must first understand how letters written in ink, as in the Torah scroll, differ from letters engraved in stone, as on the Tablets.
Marei mekomos
- 1
- 2
3וההפרש בין כתיבה לחקיקה. בגשמיות הוא פשוט דבאותיות הנכתבים בדיו הנה הדיו הוא דבר בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] ואינו מגופו ומהותו של הקלף.
And the difference between writing and engraving: in physical terms it is simple. In letters written in ink, the ink is a thing by itself and is not of the body and being of the parchment.
He begins with the physical case. Ink is a substance of its own; it is not made of the parchment it is written on.
אך כשמצטייר הדיו בצורות אותיות על הקלף ידבקו והיו לאחדים ונראה כאלו הם דבר א׳, שהרי הקלף הלבן ישנו תחת האות ועליו ממש נכתב האות והוא סובלו.
But when the ink takes shape in the forms of letters on the parchment, they cleave together and become one, and it looks as though they are one thing, for the white parchment is there beneath the letter, and the letter is written right upon it, and it bears it.
Once the ink is formed into letters on the parchment, the two look like a single thing. The parchment lies beneath every letter and carries it.
אבל מ״מ באמת הם שני דברים שהרי הקלף הוא דבר בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] והדיו הוא דבר בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] לגמרי
Nevertheless, in truth they are two things, for the parchment is a thing by itself and the ink is entirely a thing by itself,
Yet in fact the parchment and the ink remain two separate things.
רק שהלביש את הקלף הלבן להיות נראה על הקלף צורות אותיות מדיו וא״כ אין זה רק דרך הלבשה בלבד שהלבוש הוא דבר בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] ממש.
only that it has clothed the white parchment, so that forms of letters made of ink are seen on the parchment. If so, this is nothing but a manner of clothing alone, for a garment is truly a thing by itself.
The ink only covers the white parchment so that letter-shapes appear on it. That is how a garment relates to what it clothes, and a garment is a thing separate from its wearer.
Written letters are a model of union by clothing: ink and parchment look like one thing, but the ink stays a separate substance that only covers the parchment.
4ואף לבוש המחובר תמיד מ״מ מצד עצמו הוא דבר בפני עצמו. וכך הוא ענין אותיות הנכתבים בדיו הן מלבישים את הקלף בחי׳ לבוש לבד משא״כ באותיות החקיקה שנחקקים ונחרצים ע״ג [על גבי] אבן טוב וכה״ג [וכהאי גוונא]
Even a garment that is always attached is nevertheless, in itself, a thing by itself. So it is with letters written in ink: they clothe the parchment as a garment alone. This is not so with the letters of engraving, which are engraved and incised upon a precious stone and the like:
Even a garment that never comes off is still, in itself, a separate thing, and ink letters relate to the parchment in just this way. Engraved letters, cut into a precious stone or the like, are different.
הנה אין האותיות חשובים בחי׳ לבוש לבד אלא הן מעצמיותו ומהותו של האבן טוב ומגופו ממש יחשבו.
there the letters are not considered a garment alone; rather, they are of the essence and being of the precious stone, and are considered of its very body.
Engraved letters are not a covering on the stone. Nothing has been added to it, so the letters count as part of the stone’s own essence and body.
The two models are set side by side: ink letters are a garment on the parchment, while engraved letters belong to the very substance of the stone.
5והגם שמ״מ אינו דומה ממש לכמו שהיה האבן טוב מצד עצמו קודם החקיקה שמתחלה היה פשוט בלא ציור אותיות כלל וע״י החקיקה נולדו בו אותיות
And although, nevertheless, it is not exactly like the precious stone as it was in itself before the engraving, for at first it was simple, without any form of letters at all, and through the engraving letters were born in it,
He concedes a qualification. An engraved stone is not exactly as it was before: it used to be plain and formless, and the engraving brought letters into being in it.
והרי א״כ צורות האותיות אלו אינן עצמות ומהות האבן טוב שהוא מצד עצמו פשוט בלא ציור אותיות.
it follows, then, that these forms of letters are not the essence and being of the precious stone, which in itself is simple, without any form of letters;
In that sense the letter-forms are not the stone’s own essence, since the stone as such is simple and has no letters.
אך הגם שצורת האותיות היא הוי׳ חדשה אבל עכ״פ [על כל פנים] אותיות אלו הם בגוף האבן טוב ממש ואינו דבר נפרד ממנו רק חרותים וחקוקים בגופו ממש
yet although the form of the letters is a new existence, at any rate these letters are in the very body of the precious stone and are not a thing separate from it; rather, they are incised and engraved in its very body,
Still, although the letter-forms are something new, they exist within the stone’s own body: they are not a separate thing but are cut into the stone itself.
ולא כאותיות שעושים בדיו שהם דבר נפרד חוץ מהקלף וחשובים לבוש לבד
and not like letters made with ink, which are a separate thing, outside the parchment, and are considered a garment alone.
In this they are unlike ink letters, which remain a separate thing outside the parchment and count only as a garment.
אבל אותיות החקיקה אע״פ [אף על פי] שהן ג״כ אותיות ולא כקלף הלבן ואבן טוב במהותו ועצמותו שמופשט מכל צורה ממש אבל עכ״פ [על כל פנים] הם מגופו ומהותו של הדבר הנחקק ולמעלה מעלה מבחי׳ לבוש:
But the letters of engraving, although they too are letters, and are not like the white parchment, or the precious stone in its being and essence, which is utterly free of all form, are at any rate of the body and being of the thing engraved, and far, far above the level of a garment.
The conclusion: engraved letters really are letters, so they are not the formless essence of the stone (or of the white parchment). But they belong to the body and being of what is engraved, and are far above the status of a garment.
The analogy is refined: engraving does introduce something new, the letter-forms, yet the newness lies within the stone itself. Engraved letters therefore stand between the stone’s formless essence and the external garment of ink.
This middle position anticipates how the discourse will describe the Keser (paragraph 21): its Sefiros are not the simple Infinite Light itself, yet they are not something foreign to it, as engraving is neither the plain stone nor an added substance.
6והנה עם היות המשל הנ״ל הוא ענין גשמי מ״מ ממנו יובן הנמשל למעלה בענין שרש מעלת הלוחות וכמשי״ת [וכמו שיתבאר] אי״ה [אם ירצה השם].
Now, although the analogy above is a physical matter, nevertheless from it will be understood what it represents Above, regarding the root of the superiority of the Tablets, as will be explained, G‑d willing.
The physical analogy is meant to explain something Above: the root of the Tablets’ superiority. That application comes later in the discourse.
אך מקודם יש לבאר עוד איך שדוגמת המשל הנ״ל באותיות הכתיבה ואותיות החקיקה הגשמיים. יש דוגמתם ממש ברוחניות באותיות שבנפש המדברת שבאדם.
But first we must further explain how the likeness of the above analogy, in physical letters of writing and letters of engraving, has its exact counterpart in spirituality, in the letters that are in the speaking soul in man.
First he shows that the same two kinds of letters have a spiritual counterpart within the human soul, which is called the “speaking” soul because it expresses itself in thought and speech.
דהנה עם היות שהנפש מלאה אותיות1 וכמ״ש ויהי האדם לנפש חיה2 ותרגם אונקלוס לרוח ממללא3 וכדלקמן אי״ה [אם ירצה השם]
For although the soul is full of letters, as it is written, “And man became a living soul,” which Onkelos translates “a speaking spirit,” as will be explained below, G‑d willing,
The soul itself is full of letters. Onkelos renders “man became a living soul” as “a speaking spirit,” so the power of speech, and with it letters, belongs to the human soul; the discourse returns to this point later. In Likkutei Torah, Nasso, the Alter Rebbe explains that the soul is full of letters because G‑d breathed it into man with “the breath of His mouth,” which brings all things into being through the letters of the Ten Utterances.
מ״מ הנה נביעת האותיות שבמחשבה ודבור אף שנובעים מהנפש מ״מ גשם מהות אותיות הדבור שהם מבחי׳ קול והבל הלב הגשמי היוצא מן הקנה כמו דבר זר ממש נחשב לגבי מהות ועצמות הנפש
nevertheless, as for the welling forth of the letters that are in thought and speech: although they well forth from the soul, still the coarse being of the letters of speech, which are of the level of the voice and the physical breath of the heart that comes out of the windpipe, is considered like a truly foreign thing relative to the being and essence of the soul.
Even so, when letters well forth from the soul as thought and speech, the letters of speech, made of voice and the physical breath that rises from the heart through the windpipe, are like something foreign to the soul’s own being and essence.
כי מה ענין קול גשמי למהות הנפש הרוחניות ואפי׳ [ואפילו] מהות האותיות שבמחשבה שחושב ומהרהר אותיות א״ב ג״ד כו׳ מהות מחשבה זו ואותיות אלו
For what does a physical voice have to do with the being of the spiritual soul? And even the being of the letters that are in thought, when one thinks and ponders the letters alef, beis, gimmel, dalet, etc., the being of this thought and of these letters
A physical voice has nothing in common with the spiritual soul. Even the letters of thought, as when a person silently runs through the letters alef, beis, gimmel, dalet, are not of the soul’s own being.
כמו דבר זר ממש נחשב לגבי הנפש ע״ד אותיות הדבור דאע״פ [דאף על פי] שהם רוחניים יותר ממהות הקול הגשמי מ״מ בנקל לצייר שאין זה כלל מערך מהות רוחניות הנפש
is considered like a truly foreign thing relative to the soul, in the manner of the letters of speech. For although they are more spiritual than the being of the physical voice, nevertheless it is easy to picture that this is not at all comparable to the spiritual being of the soul.
The letters of thought are subtler than the physical voice, but one can easily see that they are still in no way comparable to the spiritual being of the soul.
ולכן מחשבה ודבור נקראו רק לבושין בלבד לגבי הנפש כמו הלבוש שאינו כלל ממהות הדבר רק דבר אחר ממש
Therefore thought and speech are called no more than garments in relation to the soul, like a garment, which is not at all of the being of the thing but truly something else,
This is why thought and speech are called the soul’s “garments”: like clothing, they are not part of the being of the one who wears them but something else entirely.
וכנ״ל במשל שאותיות הכתיבה הן לבושים לפי שהדיו הוא דבר זר ואינו כלל ממהות הקלף רק שמלבישו ונראה כאלו הוא דבר אחד.
as mentioned above in the analogy, that the letters of writing are garments because the ink is a foreign thing and not at all of the being of the parchment; it only clothes it, and it looks as though it is one thing.
This matches the analogy of written letters: ink is foreign to the parchment and only covers it, even though the two look like one thing.
כך אותיות המחשבה ודבור הם דברים נפרדים. אותיות הדבור הן מקול גשמי. ואותיות המחשבה רוחניים יותר ומ״מ אינן כלל ממהות הנפש
So too, the letters of thought and speech are separate things. The letters of speech are of a physical voice. The letters of thought are more spiritual, yet nevertheless they are not at all of the being of the soul,
The letters of speech are made of physical voice, while the letters of thought are more spiritual. Both, however, are separate things, not part of the soul’s own being.
וחשובים כמו לבוש לבד רק המחשבה היא לבוש המחובר והדבור הוא בחי׳ לבוש הנפרד כמ״ש במ״א,4
and are considered like a garment alone, only that thought is an attached garment and speech is the level of a separate garment, as is explained elsewhere.
Both therefore count as garments: thought is called an “attached garment” and speech a “separate garment.” In Likkutei Torah, Balak, on “Who can count the dust of Yaakov,” the Alter Rebbe explains that thought is the inner garment, which unites with the soul itself, while speech brings out and spells out what thought holds at a glance.
ואעפ״כ [ואף על פי כן] הרי הם דבוקי׳ [דבוקים] ממש במהו׳ [במהות] הנפש ממש שהרי הנפש היא המדברת אותיות הדבור ומחשבת ומהרהרת באותיות המחשבה ובלעדה אין שום מציאות לאותיות המחשבה והדבור
Even so, they truly cleave to the very being of the soul, for it is the soul that speaks the letters of speech, and thinks and ponders the letters of thought, and without it the letters of thought and speech have no existence at all.
Even so, both cleave to the soul’s very being, because it is the soul itself that speaks and thinks them; without the soul there would be no letters of thought or speech at all.
וזה ממש כמשל אותיות הנכתבים בדיו שאע״פ [שאף על פי] שאין הדיו ממהות הקלף מ״מ הוא דבוק בהקלף והקלף הוא הסובל ונושא עליו אותיות אלו
This is exactly like the analogy of letters written in ink: although the ink is not of the being of the parchment, it nevertheless cleaves to the parchment, and the parchment is what bears and carries these letters upon it.
Ink is the same: though it is foreign to the parchment, it adheres to it, and the parchment is what bears the letters.
וגם תחת שחרורית הדיו יש לבנונית הקלף ובלעדי הקלף אינו שייך שום מציאת אותיות מהדיו בעצמו.
Also, beneath the blackness of the ink is the whiteness of the parchment, and without the parchment there can be no existence at all of letters from the ink by itself.
The whiteness of the parchment also lies beneath the black of the ink, and without parchment the ink by itself could form no letters.
כך הנפש היא המדברת ומהרהרת וסובלת גשם אותיות הדבור והמחשבה ובלעדה אין שום מציאות אותיות מחשבה ודבור
So too, it is the soul that speaks and ponders, and bears the coarseness of the letters of speech and thought, and without it there is no existence at all of letters of thought and speech.
In the same way the soul speaks, thinks and bears the coarser letters of speech and thought, which could not exist without it.
וגם הארה ממנה מתלבשת באותיות המחשבה ודבור כלבנונית הקלף שתחת הדיו כדלקמן והרי א״כ אותיות המחשבה ודבור דבוקים ממש להנפש והיו לאחדים.
Also, a radiance from it is clothed in the letters of thought and speech, like the whiteness of the parchment beneath the ink, as will be explained below. If so, the letters of thought and speech truly cleave to the soul and become one.
Moreover, a radiance from the soul is clothed within these letters, as the white of the parchment lies under the ink. In this sense the letters of thought and speech are truly joined to the soul and become one with it.
The analogy of written letters is applied to the soul: the letters of thought and speech are garments, foreign to the soul’s essence, yet joined to it because the soul speaks them, bears them and shines within them.
This two-sidedness, a garment that is foreign to its wearer yet fully joined to it, is the model the discourse later uses for the ten Sefiros of Atzilus, which it likens to letters of ink on parchment (paragraphs 20–22).
Marei mekomos
- 1שהנפש מלאה אותיות · ראה לקמן פ׳ נשא כו, ב. וראה באוה״ת תבוא ע׳ תתרלב.
- 2ויהי האדם לנפש חי׳ · Genesis 2:7
- 3לרוח ממללא · Onkelos Genesis 2:7
- 4לבוש . . כמ״ש במ״א · ראה לקו״ת שה״ש ד, א. בלק סז, ג.
7ומ״מ הן לבושים לבד לפי שמצד עצמן הן דבר נפרד הדבור מן בחי׳ הבל הלב כו׳ רק שהנפש מתלבשת בהן
Nevertheless, they are garments alone, since in themselves they are a separate thing: speech is from the level of the breath of the heart, etc.; only, the soul is clothed in them.
Even so, thought and speech remain garments, for in themselves they are separate from the soul (speech, for example, is made of the breath of the heart); the soul is merely clothed in them.
זהו המשל מבחי׳ אותיות הכתיבה בדיו ע״ג [על גבי] קלף שדוגמתן ברוחנית בנפש הוא בחי׳ אותיות המחשבה והדבור כנ״ל (ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה שחורה אני1 אש שחורה ע״ג [על גבי] אש לבנה):
This is the analogy of the letters of writing, in ink upon parchment, whose counterpart in spirituality, in the soul, is the letters of thought and speech, as mentioned above. (See what is written about this in the discourse beginning “I am black,” [on] “black fire upon white fire.”)
This completes the first half of the analogy: letters of ink on parchment correspond, in the soul, to the letters of thought and speech. In Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim, on “I am black,” the Alter Rebbe takes up the Sages’ teaching that the Torah was given as black fire upon white fire: the white parchment alludes to the Infinite Light itself, and the black ink darkens it so that a letter can be revealed and grasped, as the letters of thought are garments of the intellect yet not wholly separate from it.
The paragraph closes the first half of the analogy: the letters of thought and speech are the soul’s “written letters,” garments in which the soul is clothed.
The image of black fire upon white fire fits the analogy closely: the black letters correspond to the letters of thought and speech, and the white beneath them to the radiance of the soul that is clothed in them (paragraph 6).
Marei mekomos
- 1בד״ה שחורה אני · לקו״ת שה״ש ד, ב ואילך.
Engraved letters in the soul ¶8–14
8ב אמנם להבין המשל מאותיות החקיקה מהו בנפש אין לזה דמיון כלל באותיות הגלוים לנו מהנפש רק מעט יש דמיון ממה שידוע שיש ב׳ בחי׳ במחשבה.
2. However, to understand what the analogy of the letters of engraving is in the soul: there is no likeness to it at all among the letters of the soul that are revealed to us. There is only a slight likeness, from what is known, that there are two levels in thought.
Section 2 turns to the harder half of the analogy: what in the soul corresponds to engraved letters. None of the letters we are aware of in ourselves truly resembles engraving, but there is a faint likeness in the known distinction between two levels of thought.
הא׳ הנק׳ מחשבה תתאה והוא כשחושב מה שמדבר וחושב האותיות ממש א״ב ג״ד להוציאן כן בפה כענין השמע לאזנך1 מה שאתה מוצא מפיך.
The first is called lower thought (machshavah tata’ah): when one thinks what one is saying and thinks the actual letters, alef, beis, gimmel, dalet, in order to bring them out so with the mouth, in the sense of “Let your ear hear what you bring out of your mouth.”
The first level, “lower thought,” is thinking in words: going over the very letters one is about to say aloud. It is the attention the Sages describe in the phrase “Let your ear hear what you bring out of your mouth,” fixed on the words themselves.
The search for an inner counterpart to engraved letters begins with the two levels of thought, starting with “lower thought,” which thinks in the letters of speech.
Marei mekomos
- 1השמע לאזנך · Berakhot 13a:28–30
9וזהו חיצוניות המחשבה ונק׳ למעלה בחי׳ מלכות דתבונה שהיא בחי׳ לאה חיצוניות הבינה שהיא בחי׳ אותיות המחשבה הנ״ל. ובחי׳ הב׳ הוא הנק׳ מחשבה עילאה דהיינו כשחושב השכל ולא האותיות.
This is the outer dimension (chitzoniyus) of thought, and Above it is called the level of Malchus (sovereignty) of Tevunah, which is the level of Leah, the outer dimension of Binah (understanding), which is the level of the letters of thought mentioned above. The second level is what is called higher thought (machshavah ila’ah), that is, when one thinks the concept and not the letters.
Lower thought is the outer dimension of thought. Among the Sefiros it corresponds to Malchus of Tevunah (the lower aspect of Binah), the configuration called Leah, which is the source of the letters of thought. The second level, “higher thought,” is thinking the concept itself rather than its words.
ומ״מ אף שאינו מרגיש כלל האותיות מ״מ יש כלול בחי׳ אותיות במחשבה זו שחושב השכל שא״א להיות כלל גילוי השכל אפי׳ [אפילו] במוח האדם עצמו בלי אותיות
Nevertheless, even though one does not sense the letters at all, the level of letters is nevertheless included in this thought in which one thinks the concept, for there can be no revelation of the concept at all, even in a person’s own brain, without letters;
Even in higher thought, where one is not aware of any letters, letters are present. No concept can come into the open, even inside one’s own mind, without some form of letters.
רק שהאותיות כלולים ממש בתוך השכל ממש ואינן כהרהור אותיות דמחשבה תתאה שיצאו האותיות להיות מורגשין בפני עצמן חוץ מהשכל והוא בחי׳ חיצוני׳ דבינה כנ״ל.
only, the letters are truly included within the concept itself, and are not like the pondering of the letters of lower thought, where the letters have come out to be sensed on their own, outside the concept; that is the level of the outer dimension of Binah, as mentioned above.
Here, however, the letters are completely absorbed within the concept. In lower thought the letters have come out to be sensed on their own, outside the concept, which is why it is the outer dimension of Binah.
אבל אותיות הכלולים בשכל עצמו שהוא בחי׳ פנימי׳ [פנימיות / פנימית] בינה ואינן דבר נפרד חוץ מהשכל הרי הן דבר א׳ עם השכל
But the letters included in the concept itself, which is the level of the inner dimension (pnimiyus) of Binah, and which are not a separate thing outside the concept, are one thing with the concept.
The letters within the concept itself correspond to the inner dimension of Binah. Since they are not separate from the concept, they are one with it.
And yet, nevertheless, there are letters there. Above, too, this is the matter of “the engravings of a seal,” the source of the letters, which is in the level of Yesod (foundation) of Imma,
Still, letters are there. Above, they correspond to “the engravings of a seal,” the Torah’s phrase for the names engraved on the High Priest’s stones, used here for the source of letters in the Yesod of Imma, the channel at the base of Binah (Imma, “mother”).
שמשם נמשך להיות התהוות אותיות מחשבה ודבור הנק׳ לאה ורחל.3 ולכן נקראת הבינה ספר ע״ש [על שם] סיפורי האותיות שמתהוים ממנה במחשבה ודבור.
from which comes the coming into being of the letters of thought and speech, which are called Leah and Rachel. Therefore Binah is called sefer (“book”), on account of the sippurei (“tellings”) of the letters that come into being from it in thought and speech.
From there come the letters of thought and speech, known in Kabbalah as Leah and Rachel; in Likkutei Torah, Metzora, the Alter Rebbe explains that Leah is the letters of thought, the Written Torah, and Rachel the letters of speech, the Oral Torah. This is why Binah is called a “book” (sefer): the word is related to sippur, “telling,” for the letters that come into being from it in thought and speech are its tellings.
Thought has an outer level, thinking in letters, and an inner level, thinking the concept itself, in which letters are present but completely absorbed. Above, these are the outer and inner dimensions of Binah, and the source of all letters is called “the engravings of a seal.”
Leah and Rachel are two feminine configurations in the Kabbalah of the Arizal; the discourse identifies them with the letters of thought and of speech respectively.
Marei mekomos
- 1פתוחי חותם · Exodus 21:13
- 2פתוחי חותם · Exodus 28:11
- 3אותיות מחשבה ודבור הנק׳ לאה ורחל · נסמן לעיל (מצורע) כד, ג.
10והנה בחי׳ אותיות אלו הכלולים בהשכל ממש המתגלה מהנפש במוח האדם היא כמו משל אותיות החקיקה שהן בגופו של האבן טוב ולא כמו דיו שהוא נפרד מצד עצמו מהקלף כו׳.
Now, these letters that are truly included in the concept that is revealed from the soul in a person’s brain are like the analogy of the letters of engraving, which are in the very body of the precious stone, and not like ink, which in itself is separate from the parchment, etc.
The letters absorbed within a concept, as it is revealed from the soul in the mind, resemble engraved letters. They are part of the concept itself, not something laid over it like ink on parchment.
וכך אותיות אלו הן מגוף ומהות השכל ממש שממהות ועצם השכל נמשכו בחי׳ אותיות אלו הכלולים בו ממש
So too, these letters are of the very body and being of the concept, for these letters, which are truly included in it, were drawn from the being and essence of the concept.
They are drawn from the very being of the concept and remain part of it.
ולכן לא נרגשו כלל להיות דבר בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] כאותיות המחשבה תתאה והדבור שהן בחי׳ דבר זר ונפרד ממהות השכל כנ״ל.
Therefore they are not sensed at all as a thing by themselves, like the letters of lower thought and of speech, which are a thing foreign to and separate from the being of the concept, as mentioned above.
That is why they are never felt as something separate, unlike the letters of lower thought and of speech, which are foreign to the concept.
משא״כ כאן במחשבת השכל שאינן דבר בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] שהרי אינו חושב כלל האותיות רק שחושב השכל ממש אלא שבו נמצאו ובו היו האותיות כנ״ל:
This is not so here, in the thinking of the concept, where they are not a thing by themselves, for one does not think the letters at all, only the concept itself; it is just that the letters are found within it and exist within it, as mentioned above.
When one thinks a concept, one does not think letters at all; one thinks only the idea, and the letters simply exist within it.
The letters hidden in a concept are likened to engraved letters, since they are of one substance with it, unlike the letters of verbal thought and speech, which are like ink.
11אמנם באמת אין משל זה מכוון עדיין ואינו דוגמא לבחי׳ אותיות שבנפש. כי אותיות הכלולים בשכל יתכן עליהן שהן עצם א׳ עם השכל וכמו חקיקה.
In truth, however, this analogy is still not precise, and it is not a parallel to the level of the letters that are in the soul. For of the letters included in the concept one can say that they are of one essence with the concept, like engraving,
He now qualifies the analogy: it does not yet capture the soul’s own engraved letters. Letters within a concept are one with the concept, as engraving is one with the stone.
אבל לא יתכן לומר עליהם שהם עצם א׳ עם הנפש שהיא למעלה אפי׳ [אפילו] מכח השכל כש״כ [כל שכן] מן השכל הגלוי
but one cannot say of them that they are of one essence with the soul, which is above even the power of intellect, and all the more so above revealed intellect.
But they are not one with the soul itself, for the soul is higher even than the power of intellect, let alone the intellect that comes into the open.
(וגם לא יתיישב מה שית׳ לקמן דבבחי׳ אותיות החקיקה שבנפש שייך הליכה ותוספת נביע׳ [נביעה] חדשה דמהשכל הגלוי לא יהי׳ [יהיה] כלל נביעות חדשות)
(Nor would it fit what will be explained below, that at the level of the letters of engraving in the soul there can be “walking” and an addition of new welling forth, for from revealed intellect there would be no new wellings forth at all.)
This aside looks ahead: the discourse will show that the soul’s engraved letters allow for “walking,” a continual new welling forth. Revealed intellect yields no new wellings forth, so the engraved letters that make walking possible must lie higher in the soul.
ולענין המשל יובן ממ״ש באגה״ק [באגרת הקודש] ע״פ ויעש דוד שם שמבטא אותיות והנקודות הוא למעלה מהשכל המושג ומובן אלא משכל הנעלם וקדמות השכל שבנפש המדברת1
As for the analogy, it will be understood from what is written in Iggeres HaKodesh on the verse “And David made a name,” that the articulation of the letters and the vowels is above the intellect that is grasped and understood, and comes rather from the hidden intellect and the primordial intellect (kadmus hasechel) in the speaking soul.
The fitting analogy comes from Iggeres HaKodesh (Tanya, Part IV, epistle 5), on “And David made a name.” There it is explained that the ability to articulate letters and vowels does not come from the intellect a person grasps and understands, but from the hidden intellect and the primordial intellect of the speaking soul, the level that precedes understanding.
ולכן אין התינוק יכול לדבר אף שמבין הכל כו׳ ע״ש.
Therefore an infant cannot speak, even though he understands everything, etc. See there.
The proof is an infant, who understands everything and yet cannot speak: understanding alone does not produce speech.
Letters absorbed in a concept are one only with the concept, not with the soul. The soul’s true engraved letters lie in the power of articulation, which, as Iggeres HaKodesh explains, comes from the hidden and primordial intellect.
Marei mekomos
- 1שמבטא אותיות והנקודות הוא למעלה מהשכל המושג ומובן אלא משכל הנעלם וקדמות השכל שבנפש המדברת · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 5:5–6
12וע״פ כ״ז [כל זה] יובן איך שיש בנפש בחי׳ אותיות החקיקה ואותיות הכתיבה והיינו כמו שאותיות החקיקה הם חקוקים בגוף ועצם האבן ואין כאן דבר נוסף,
According to all this, it will be understood how there are in the soul the level of the letters of engraving and [that of] the letters of writing. That is: just as the letters of engraving are engraved in the body and essence of the stone, and nothing is added here,
From all this one can see that the soul has both engraved letters and written letters. Engraved letters are cut into the stone itself and add nothing to it.
כך הוא ענין צורת הכ״ב אותיות שמקורן הוא מקדמות השכל ורצון הנפש1 הרי הם למעלה ממהות מחשבה ואפי׳ [ואפילו] ממהות שכל הגלוי כדפי׳ לעיל שהוא למעלה משכל המושג ומובן אלא משכל הנעלם וקדמות השכל.
so is the form of the twenty-two letters, whose source is from the primordial intellect and the will of the soul: they are above the being of thought, and even above the being of revealed intellect, as explained above, that it is above the intellect that is grasped and understood, and comes rather from the hidden intellect and the primordial intellect.
In the same way, the forms of the twenty-two letters have their source in the soul’s primordial intellect and will. They stand above thought, and even above revealed intellect, as Iggeres HaKodesh explains.
The soul’s engraved letters are identified: the forms of the twenty-two letters as they exist in their source, the soul’s primordial intellect and will.
Marei mekomos
- 1שמקורן הוא מקדמות השכל ורצון הנפש · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 5:6
13ור״ל [ורוצה לומר] כח השכל הכלול בעצם הנפש שם הוא מקור צורת כ״ב אותיות הנ״ל.
That is to say: the power of intellect that is included in the essence of the soul, there is the source of the form of the twenty-two letters mentioned above.
The power of intellect contained in the soul’s essence is the source of the form of the twenty-two letters.
וגילוי השכל המתגלה במוח האדם הוא רק איזה הארה נשפעת ונמשכת משכל הנעלם שבנפש וכלא חשיב לגבי שכל הנעלם שיכול להשכיל השכלות רבות מאד
And the revelation of intellect that is revealed in a person’s brain is only some radiance that flows and is drawn from the hidden intellect in the soul, and it counts as nothing compared to the hidden intellect, which can conceive very many insights.
The intellect revealed in a person’s mind is only a faint glow drawn from the hidden intellect, and it is as nothing beside it, since the hidden intellect can produce a great many insights.
כי שכל הנעלם מיוחד בעצם הנפש ולמעלה מגילוי כחותיה במחשבה דו״מ [דבור ומעשה] ושם הם מקור צורת הכ״ב אותיות א״כ ה״ז [הרי זה] כמו אותיות החקיקה שהן במהות הנפש ועצמותה ואין כאן דבר זר ומהות אחר.
For the hidden intellect is united with the essence of the soul and is above the revelation of its powers in thought, speech and action, and there is the source of the form of the twenty-two letters. If so, this is like the letters of engraving, which are in the being and essence of the soul, and there is no foreign thing and no other being here.
The hidden intellect is united with the soul’s essence and is above its powers of thought, speech and action. Because the form of the letters originates there, it is like engraving: part of the soul’s own being, with nothing foreign added.
The hidden intellect, united with the soul’s essence, is the source of the form of the letters, so those letters are like engraving in the soul’s own substance.
14והן אמת שמהות ועצמות הנפש ממש הוא למעלה מעלה ממהות צורת האותיות כי האותיות היא רק בחי׳ אחרונה שבה. אך מ״מ עכ״פ [על כל פנים] הוא בחי׳ אחרונה שבמהותה ועצמותה ממש ולא תוספת מהות אחר.
It is true that the very being and essence of the soul is far, far above the being of the form of the letters, for the letters are only the last level in it. Yet nevertheless, at any rate, it is the last level of its very being and essence, and not the addition of another being.
He concedes that the soul’s essence is far above the form of letters, which is only its last and lowest level. Still, that last level belongs to the soul’s own being; it is not something added from outside.
וה״ז [והרי זה] כמשל אותיות החקוקים בהאבן טוב שהאבן טוב מצד עצמו פשוט בתכלית ולמעלה מתמונת אותיות וכשחוקקים בו אותיות נחשך קצת העצם הפשוט אמנם מ״מ אין כאן מהות אחר.
This is like the analogy of letters engraved in the precious stone: the precious stone in itself is utterly simple and above the shape of letters, and when letters are engraved in it the simple substance is somewhat darkened; nevertheless, there is no other being here.
This matches the precious stone: engraving dims its simple, letterless substance a little, yet introduces nothing foreign.
משא״כ כשנמשכים הכ״ב אותיות מהנפש במחשבה ודבור ומתלבשים בחומר וגוף אותיות הדבור שהוא בחי׳ הבל הלב (ואפי׳ [ואפילו] המחשבה כו׳ כנ״ל)
This is not so when the twenty-two letters are drawn from the soul into thought and speech, and are clothed in the matter and body of the letters of speech, which is the level of the breath of the heart (and even thought, etc., as mentioned above):
The soul’s written letters appear when the twenty-two letters descend into thought and speech and are clothed in the matter of spoken sound, the breath of the heart. As said above, even thought is such a garment.
הרי ההבל הוא מהות גשמי ואינו ערוך למהות הנפש
the breath is a physical being and bears no comparison to the being of the soul.
Breath is physical and bears no comparison with the soul’s being.
זהו כמשל אותיות הכתיבה שהן מדיו שהוא מהות זר מן הקלף שהקלף הוא לבן והדיו הוא שחור ומהות זר לגמרי רק שכותבין בו על הקלף ונעשה אות כו׳.
This is like the analogy of the letters of writing, which are of ink, a being foreign to the parchment, for the parchment is white and the ink is black, an entirely foreign being; only, one writes with it on the parchment and it becomes a letter, etc.
These letters are therefore like letters written in ink: ink is foreign to the parchment, black on white, and forms a letter only because someone writes with it on the parchment.
כך ההבל מלביש לבחי׳ צורת האותיות כדיו המלביש להקלף כו׳ ומ״מ היו לאחדים שהנפש היא המדברת ובלעדה אין אומר ואין דברים1 כמו שא״א להיות אותיות מדיו בלי קלף.
So the breath clothes the form of the letters, like the ink that clothes the parchment, etc. Nevertheless they have become one, for it is the soul that speaks, and without it “there is no utterance and there are no words,” just as there cannot be letters of ink without parchment.
So breath clothes the letter-forms as ink covers the parchment, yet the two become one because it is the soul that speaks. Without the soul “there is no utterance and there are no words,” just as ink letters cannot exist without parchment.
Also, any letter that is not surrounded by parchment on its four sides is invalid, as the matter is explained on the verse “Set me as a seal.” See there.
The law that a letter must be surrounded by parchment on all four sides adds a further point: the written letter depends on the parchment around it as well as beneath it. The matter is explained in the discourse on “Set me as a seal.”
The soul’s essence is far above letters, yet the form of the letters is its own last level, like engraving. When the letters are clothed in physical breath for speech, they become like ink on parchment: foreign, yet joined.
The distinction between the form of the letters, rooted in the soul’s primordial intellect and will, and their matter, the breath and voice of speech, follows Iggeres HaKodesh 5, which calls them the form and the matter of the letters.
Marei mekomos
- 1אין אומר ואין דברים · Psalms 19:4
- 2כל אות שאין גויל מקיף מד׳ רוחותיה פסול · Menachot 29a:17–18
- 3שימני כחותם · Song of Songs 8:6
Engraving Above: Keser ¶15–22
15ג והנה אחר שנתבאר ענין אותיות החקיקה ואותיות הכתיבה מהו ההפרש ביניהם במשל גשמי ונתבאר ג״כ כל זה ברוחניות באותיות הנפש.
3. Now, after the matter of the letters of engraving and the letters of writing has been explained, what the difference between them is in a physical analogy, and all this has also been explained in spirituality, in the letters of the soul,
Section 3 opens with a summary. The difference between engraved and written letters has now been shown both in a physical analogy and in the letters of the soul.
מעתה יובן כ״ז [כל זה] מעט מזעיר בנמשל למעלה בענין שורש הלוחות שהן בחי׳ חרות וחקיקה מהו מעלתן על תורה שבכתב בבחי׳ כתיבה.
from now on all this will be understood, in some small measure, in what it represents Above, regarding the root of the Tablets, which are the level of “engraved” and of engraving: what their superiority is over the Written Torah, which is at the level of writing.
Now the analogy can be applied, at least in a small way, to what it stands for Above: the root of the Tablets, whose letters were engraved, and why they surpass the Written Torah, whose letters are written.
כי הנה ידוע ענין בחי׳ אותיות למעלה כמ״ש בדבר ה׳ שמים נעשו1 שהן בחי׳ התגלות. כי אותיות מלשון אתא כו׳.
For the matter of the level of letters Above is known, as it is written, “By the word of Havayah the heavens were made”: they are the level of revelation, for osiyos (“letters”) is related to asa (“came”), etc.
It is known that there are “letters” Above as well, as in the verse “By the word of Havayah the heavens were made,” which speaks of G‑d’s creative speech. Letters are a form of revelation: the Hebrew word for letters, osiyos, is linked to the Aramaic asa, “came,” for letters bring what is hidden into the open.
Section 3 turns from the analogies to their application Above: the root of the Tablets, and the “letters” through which G‑d creates, which are a form of revelation.
Marei mekomos
- 1בדבר ה׳ שמים נעשו · Psalms 33:6
16ויש עד״מ בחי׳ אותיות הדבור המהוה ומחי׳ עלמין דאתגליין ויש בחי׳ אותיות המחשבה המחיה ומהוה עלמין סתימין.
By way of analogy, there is the level of the letters of speech, which brings into being and gives life to the revealed worlds, and there is the level of the letters of thought, which gives life to and brings into being the hidden worlds.
By way of analogy, G‑d’s “letters of speech” create and sustain the revealed worlds, while His “letters of thought” create and sustain the hidden, higher worlds.
אמנם ב׳ בחי׳ אלו נק׳ לבושין כמו שע״ד משל למטה ההבל מלביש צורת האותיות כך הם בחי׳ לבושים כדי שיוכלו העולמות לקבל החיות וזהו ע״ד משל כמו אותיות הכתיבה.
However, these two levels are called garments: just as, by way of analogy, below, the breath clothes the form of the letters, so these are the level of garments, so that the worlds can receive the life-force (chayus). This is, by way of analogy, like the letters of writing.
Both are called garments. As breath clothes the form of the letters in human speech, these letters clothe the divine life-force so that the worlds can receive it, and so they correspond to letters written in ink.
אמנם יש ג״כ בחי׳ אותיות החקיקה והוא מ״ש בתחלת ספר זוה״ק [זוהר הקדוש] (בראשית ד׳ ט״ו ע״א) בריש הרמנותא דמלכא1 גליף גליפו בטהירו עילאה.
But there is also the level of the letters of engraving. This is what is said at the beginning of the book of the holy Zohar (Bereishis, folio 15a): “At the very beginning of the King’s authority, He engraved engravings in the supernal brightness.”
Above there are also engraved letters, as the Zohar says at the very start of its commentary on Genesis: “At the very beginning of the King’s authority, He engraved engravings in the supernal brightness.” The first act of G‑d’s will was an engraving, not a writing.
פי׳ טהירו עילאה הוא בחי׳ התגלות הארה מא״ס ב״ה מלשון כעצם השמים לטוהר2 ובחי׳ התהוות פרצוף ע״י [עתיק יומין] וא״א מהארה זו נק׳ גליף גליפו שהוא ענין חקיקה ורשימה בטהירו עילאה
That is: the supernal brightness (tehiru ila’ah) is the level of the revelation of a radiance from the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, from the expression “like the essence of the heavens in purity” (latohar). And the coming into being of the configuration of Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin from this radiance is called “He engraved engravings,” which is the matter of engraving and inscription in the supernal brightness.
The “supernal brightness” is a revealed radiance from the Infinite One; its name, tehiru, is related to tohar, “purity,” as in the verse “like the essence of the heavens in purity.” The coming into being of Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin, the two aspects of Keser, out of this radiance is what the Zohar calls “He engraved engravings”: a mark cut within the brightness itself.
ונמשלו לחקיקה להורות שבחי׳ הכתר הנק׳ ע״י [עתיק יומין] ואריך אנפין מתאחד בתכלית בהאור א״ס ולמעלה מעלה מבחי׳ שאר העשר ספירות דאצי׳
They are likened to engraving to teach that the level of Keser (the Crown), which is called Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin, is utterly united with the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), and far, far above the level of the rest of the ten Sefiros of Atzilus (Emanation).
The image of engraving teaches that Keser, which consists of Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin, is completely united with the Infinite Light and far above the ten Sefiros of Atzilus. In Likkutei Torah, Chukas, the Alter Rebbe pictures it as letters engraved in a brilliant gemstone: there the stone shines a little less, yet the engraving is in the stone itself.
Although of them too [it is said that] “He and His vessels (ihu vegarmohi) are one,” they are nevertheless likened to the level of the letters of writing, as will be explained.
The Sefiros of Atzilus are also one with G‑d, as the Tikkunei Zohar says, “He and His vessels are one,” yet they are compared to written letters, as the discourse will explain.
אבל בחי׳ ע״י [עתיק יומין] וא״א נמשלו לחקיקה. ומ״מ גליף גליפו רק בטה״ע [בטהירו עילאה] שהוא בחי׳ ההארה הנמשכת מן האור א״ס
But the level of Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin is likened to engraving. Nevertheless, “He engraved engravings” only “in the supernal brightness,” which is the level of the radiance drawn from the Infinite Light
Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin, then, are compared to engraving. Still, the engraving took place only in the “supernal brightness,” a radiance drawn from the Infinite Light, and not in the Light itself.
(וע׳ מענין טה״ע [טהירו עילאה] בביאור ע״פ וכעצם השמים לטהר5 לעיל בפ׳ משפטים ובמק״מ [ובמקדש מלך] בראשית ט״ו ד״ה בטהירו עילאה)
(on the supernal brightness, see the explanation on the verse “And like the essence of the heavens in purity,” above in Parshas Mishpatim, and the Mikdash Melech on Bereishis, [folio] 15, the passage beginning “In the supernal brightness”),
This aside sends the reader to Torah Ohr, Mishpatim, on the verse “And like the essence of the heavens in purity,” where “the essence of the heavens” is the letters of the Name Mah reaching up to the supernal brightness, and to the Mikdash Melech, a commentary on the Zohar, on this passage.
משא״כ מהותו ועצמותו ית׳ אין שייך כלל לומר בו כן וכנודע ג״כ שהצמצום ומקום פנוי היה רק בהאור כו׳ כמ״ש במ״א.
whereas of His being and essence, blessed be He, it is not at all applicable to say this; as is also known, the tzimtzum (contraction) and the vacated space were only in the light, etc., as is explained elsewhere.
Of G‑d’s own being and essence one cannot speak of engraving at all. In the same way, it is known that the tzimtzum, the withdrawal that left a “vacated space” for the worlds, took place only in His light, not in His essence.
והענין כי הנה ידוע מחלוקת המקובלים אם הכתר נמנה מכלל ע״ס [עשר ספירות] או שאינו מכלל כמו שהובא בפרדס שער ג׳6
The matter is this: there is a known dispute among the Kabbalists whether Keser is counted among the Ten Sefiros or is not among them, as is brought in the Pardes, Sha’ar 3.
To explain why Keser is likened to engraving, he cites a known dispute among the Kabbalists, brought in Rabbi Moshe Cordovero’s Pardes Rimonim, Gate 3: is Keser counted among the Ten Sefiros?
שיש מי שרצו לומר שהוא אינו בגדר הי״ס [הי׳ ספירות] כלל רק הוא בחי׳ הארת אור א״ס כו׳. ויש שחלקו ע״ז ואמרו שהוא מכלל הע״ס [העשר ספירות].
There are some who wished to say that it is not within the bounds of the ten Sefiros at all, but is only the level of a radiance of the Infinite Light, etc.; and some disagreed with this and said that it is among the Ten Sefiros.
Some held that Keser is not one of the Sefiros at all but a radiance of the Infinite Light; others disagreed and counted it among the Ten Sefiros.
והאר״י [והאלקי רבי יצחק] ז״ל [זכרונו לברכה / זכרונם לברכה] הכריע (בע״ח [בעץ חיים] שער מ״א פ״ג [פרק ג׳])7 שהוא בחי׳ ממוצע בין המאציל לנאצלים ויש בו מבחי׳ תחתונה שבאין סוף והוא בחי׳ עתיק יומין
And the Arizal, of blessed memory, decided (in Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 41, chapter 3) that it is an intermediary between the Emanator and the emanated. There is in it something of the lowest level of the Infinite One, and that is the level of Atik Yomin.
The Arizal settled the question in Etz Chaim: Keser is an intermediary between the Emanator, G‑d, and the emanated Sefiros, and its upper part, Atik Yomin, holds the lowest level of the Infinite One; Likkutei Torah, V’Zos HaBerachah, explains that it is called Atik, “removed,” because it bears no relation at all to the emanated Sefiros. The discourse cites Sha’ar 41, chapter 3, by the numbering of the Shklov printing; in today’s editions it is Sha’ar 42, and the Kehot note says the chapter should read 1.
וזו הבחינה האצילה את הבחי׳ הב׳ שבו שהוא שרש כל י״ס [י׳ ספירות] הנאצלים8 בבחי׳ העלם ודקות גדול והוא הנק׳ אריך אנפין וב׳ בחי׳ אלו יחד נק׳ כתר והיא בחי׳ הממוצע9 כו׳ יעו״ש [יעויין שם].
And this level emanated the second level in it, which is the root of all ten emanated Sefiros, in a state of concealment and great subtlety, and that is what is called Arich Anpin. These two levels together are called Keser, and it is the intermediary, etc. See there.
That level emanated Keser’s second part, Arich Anpin, the root of all ten Sefiros in a hidden and very subtle form; together the two parts are called Keser, the intermediary. In Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim, the Alter Rebbe explains why it is needed: the Infinite Light could not be revealed and bring the Sefiros into being without an intermediary holding both the last level of the Emanator and the root of the emanated.
הרי מבואר דבחי׳ הכתר הוא למעלה מכל הע״ס [העשר ספירות] שאפי׳ [שאפילו] בחי׳ תחתונה שבו היא רק שרש הנאצלים בדקות גדול ולמעלה ממהות ספירות דאצילות.
It is thus explained that the level of Keser is above all the Ten Sefiros, for even the lowest level in it is only the root of the emanated [Sefiros], in great subtlety, and is above the being of the Sefiros of Atzilus.
So Keser stands above all the Ten Sefiros. Even its lower part is only their root, present in a very subtle way, and is above the nature of the Sefiros of Atzilus.
וזהו כעין ענין ע״ס [עשר ספירות] הגנוזות הנזכר בלשון הגאונים10 ובלשון האר״י [האלקי רבי יצחק] ז״ל [זכרונו לברכה / זכרונם לברכה] הוא ענין ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דעתיק ודא״א.
This is somewhat like the matter of the ten hidden Sefiros mentioned in the language of the Geonim; in the language of the Arizal, of blessed memory, it is the matter of the Ten Sefiros of Atik and of Arich Anpin.
This resembles what the Geonim called the “ten hidden Sefiros.” In the Arizal’s terms these are the Ten Sefiros of Atik and of Arich Anpin, the Sefiros as they exist within Keser; Likkutei Torah, Beha’aloscha, notes that by the Arizal’s teaching the hidden Sefiros of the Pardes are G‑d’s holy Names, which, like a person’s name, do not touch His essence.
וביאור הענין הנה יובן ע״ד דוגמא מענין מארז״ל [מאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] (מנחות דכ״ט) גבי ר׳ [רבי] עקיבא ששאל משה רבע״ה [רבינו עליו השלום] זו תורה וזו שכרה והיתה התשובה שתוק כך עלה במחשבה11.12
The explanation of the matter will be understood by way of illustration from what our Sages, of blessed memory, said (Menachos, folio 29) concerning Rabbi Akiva, that Moshe our teacher, peace be upon him, asked, “This is Torah and this is its reward?” and the answer was, “Be silent; thus it arose in thought.”
To illustrate, he brings the Talmud’s account: Moshe was shown Rabbi Akiva’s Torah and then his martyrdom, and asked, “This is Torah and this is its reward?” G‑d answered, “Be silent; thus it arose in thought.”
פי׳ כי מבחי׳ חכמה עילאה היתה השגת משה רבינו שמשם נמשכה התורה שבכתב מבחי׳ נובלות ואחוריים דח״ע [דחכמה עילאה]13 כמ״ש באגה״ק [באגרת הקודש]14 ד״ה עוטה אור כו׳.1516
That is: the comprehension of Moshe our teacher was from the level of the higher Chochmah (Chochmah ila’ah), from which the Written Torah was drawn, from the level of the novlos (“fallen fruit”) and the back of the higher Chochmah, as is explained in Iggeres HaKodesh, in the discourse beginning “He wraps Himself in light,” etc.
Moshe’s understanding reached the higher Chochmah of Atzilus, the source of the Written Torah. The Written Torah comes from its outer levels, called the novlos (“fallen fruit”) and the “back” of Chochmah, as Iggeres HaKodesh explains in the epistle beginning “He wraps Himself in light.”
G‑d’s letters of speech and thought are garments, like written letters, but the Zohar speaks of a prior “engraving” in the supernal brightness: Keser, made of Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin, which according to the Arizal is an intermediary united with the Infinite Light. The story of Moshe and Rabbi Akiva begins to show how far Keser is above Atzilus.
The passage in Likkutei Torah, Chukas, to which the Kehot note points, also brings the Eshel Avraham’s reading of “the beginning of the King’s authority” as what arose in G‑d’s simple will, that He be called King.
Marei mekomos
- 1מ״ש . . בריש הרמנותא דמלכא · ראה לקמן פ׳ חוקת נט, ג. ביאה״ז לצ״צ ע׳ שצח ואילך.
- 2כעצם השמים לטוהר · Exodus 24:10
- 3איהו וגרמוהי חד · ת״ז בהקדמה.
- 4איהו וגרמוהי חד · Tikkunei Zohar 3b:9–10
- 5בביאור ע״פ וכעצם השמים לטהר · תו״א עח, ג. נתבאר בארוכה באוה״ת בלק ע׳ תתקסו. אוה״ת ענינים ע׳ קסב.
- 6מחלוקת המקובלים . . בפרדס שער ג׳ · ראה מאמרי אדה״ז — ענינים ע׳ קצא. סה״מ תרס״ו ע׳ קמה.
- 7בע״ח שער מ״א פ״ג · בדפוס שקלאוו תר״ס. [לפננו שער מ״ב] צ״ל פ״א ולא פ״ג [כ]. בארוכה ראה אוה״ת בלק ע׳ תתקסו.
- 8האצילה את הבחי׳ הב׳ שבו שהוא שרש כל י״ס הנאצלים · Sefer Etz Chaim 42:3
- 9כתר והיא בחי׳ הממוצע · Song of Songs 7:4
- 10ע״ס הגנוזות . . הגאונים · ראה הנסמן לקמן (בהעלותך) לו, א.
- 11
- 12שתוק כך עלה במחשבה · ראה ביאה״ז לאדה״א מז, א.
- 13נובלות ואחוריים דח״ע · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 19:2
- 14באגה״ק — חכמה · ראה לעיל בהוספות יח, ג הערת כ״ק אדמו״ר מהורש״ב נ״ע.
- 15ויש — יומין · וע׳ ברכה לקמן צט, א [כ].
- 16
17וע״פ חכמה זו לא נתיישב זה הענין וכי זו תורה וזו שכרה אלא שהשיב לו הקב״ה כך עלה במחשבה שזה נמשך מבחי׳ חכמה סתימאה
According to this Chochmah (wisdom) the matter was not resolved: is this Torah and this its reward?! But the Holy One, blessed be He, answered him, “Thus it arose in thought,” meaning that this is drawn from the level of the hidden Chochmah (Chochmah stima’ah).
From the standpoint of the higher Chochmah, Moshe’s question had no answer. G‑d’s reply, “Thus it arose in thought,” meant that the matter came from the hidden Chochmah.
וזהו לשון עלה שהוא למעלה מעלה מחכמה עילאה הנק׳ תשב״כ [תורה שבכתב] אלא נמשך מחכמה סתימאה שהוא למעלה מעלה מבחי׳ הבנה והשגה הנמשך מחכמה דאצי׳ ועד״מ כמו שבאדם יש גילוי השכל ויש כח השכל שלמעלה מהשכל המושג ומובן.
This is [the meaning of] the word “arose,” for it is far, far above the higher Chochmah, which is called the Written Torah, and is drawn rather from the hidden Chochmah, which is far, far above the level of understanding and comprehension that is drawn from the Chochmah of Atzilus (Emanation). By way of analogy: in a person there is revealed intellect, and there is the power of intellect, which is above the intellect that is grasped and understood.
The word “arose” signals a source far above the higher Chochmah, the level of the Written Torah: the hidden Chochmah, within Keser, beyond any understanding drawn from the Chochmah of Atzilus. A person, similarly, has revealed intellect and also the power of intellect, which is above everything he grasps and understands.
G‑d’s answer to Moshe points to a source of reasons, the hidden Chochmah, beyond the Chochmah of Atzilus from which the Written Torah and Moshe’s understanding come.
18וכמו כשאדם מעמיק בשכלו באיזו סברא ויפול לו בשכלו איזה סברא חדשה שהיא ודאי נמשכת מבחי׳ כח השכל שלמעלה מהשכל המושג ומובן שהיה לו בתחלה
It is as when a person delves with his intellect into some line of reasoning, and some new reasoning occurs to his mind: it is certainly drawn from the level of the power of intellect that is above the intellect he had grasped and understood at first.
An example from human thinking: when someone delves into an argument and a new insight suddenly occurs to him, it surely comes from his power of intellect, which is above the understanding he had before.
שהשכל הראשון שהי׳ [שהיה] מושג לו כשהעמיק בסברא זו לא היה רק בחי׳ כלי בעלמא לקבל אותה שפע הבאה פתאום מלמעלה מהשכל. כך ע״ד משל זה יתפרש ג״כ ענין עלה במחשבה.
For the first intellect, which he had grasped when he delved into this reasoning, was only the level of a mere vessel to receive that flow which comes suddenly from above intellect. So, along the lines of this analogy, the matter of “it arose in thought” will also be explained.
The understanding he had while delving served only as a vessel to receive the insight that came suddenly from beyond intellect. The phrase “it arose in thought” is to be understood in the same way.
פי׳ המחשבה סתם הוא חכמה דאצי׳ ולשם נמשך מבחי׳ חכמה סתימאה להיות כך וכך בענין ר׳ [רבי] עקיבא, והל״ל [והוה ליה למימר] ירד ונפל במחשבה שהרי הח״ס [החכמה סתימאה] הוא למעלה מחכמה דאצילות ומבחי׳ ח״ס [חכמה סתימאה] נמשך זה במחשבה שהיא חכמה דאצילות.
That is: “thought” unqualified is the Chochmah (wisdom) of Atzilus (Emanation), and into it there was drawn, from the level of the hidden Chochmah, that it should be thus and thus in the matter of Rabbi Akiva. Then it should have said “descended and fell into thought,” for the hidden Chochmah is above the Chochmah of Atzilus, and from the level of the hidden Chochmah this was drawn into thought, which is the Chochmah of Atzilus.
“Thought” on its own means the Chochmah of Atzilus, and what was decided about Rabbi Akiva came into it from the hidden Chochmah. Since that is a movement from higher to lower, one would expect the Talmud to say it “descended” or “fell” into thought, not that it “arose.”
אלא מפני שהח״ס [שהחכמה סתימאה] נק׳ ג״כ מחשבה סתימאה ובזה שייך לומר באמת לשון עלה שכך עלה במחשבה זו לכך אמר בכלל לשון עלה.
But because the hidden Chochmah is also called hidden thought (machshavah stima’ah), and of this one can truly use the word “arose,” that “thus it arose” in this thought, therefore He used the word “arose” in general.
The word “arose” is used because the hidden Chochmah is also called “hidden thought,” and of that higher thought one can truly say the matter “arose” there. That is why the expression “arose” was chosen.
A new insight that comes suddenly from the hidden power of intellect illustrates the hidden Chochmah, and the word “arose” refers to its source in “hidden thought,” above the Chochmah of Atzilus.
19ועכ״פ [ועל כל פנים] מובן מזה איך בחי׳ הח״ס [החכמה סתימאה] שהיא שרש הח״ע [החכמה עילאה] איך שהיא בכתר היא למעלה מעלה ממהות חכמה דאצי׳ עד שאינו מושג ומובן כלל בח״ע [בחכמה עילאה] כנ״ל בשאלת זו תורה כו׳
At any rate, it is understood from this how the level of the hidden Chochmah (wisdom), which is the root of the higher Chochmah, as it is in Keser (the Crown), is far, far above the being of the Chochmah of Atzilus (Emanation), so that it is not grasped or understood at all in the higher Chochmah, as mentioned above in the question “This is Torah,” etc.,
The conclusion: the hidden Chochmah, the root of the higher Chochmah as it exists within Keser, is so far above the Chochmah of Atzilus that it cannot be grasped there at all. That is why Moshe’s question, “This is Torah…?”, could not be answered at his level.
עד שא״א להיות התשובה רק שתוק כו׳ כאלו אין לזה טעם לפי שהטעם הזה שבח״ס [שבחכמה סתימאה] הוא למעלה מעלה מההשגה באצי׳ ששם היתה השגת משה רבע״ה [רבינו עליו השלום].
so that there could be no answer but “Be silent,” etc., as though there were no reason for it, because this reason in the hidden Chochmah is far, far above the comprehension in Atzilus, where the comprehension of Moshe our teacher, peace be upon him, was.
The only possible answer was “Be silent,” as if there were no reason. The reason exists, but in the hidden Chochmah, far above the understanding of Atzilus, where Moshe’s comprehension lay.
Keser’s hidden Chochmah is beyond all understanding in Atzilus, which is why the answer to Moshe had to be “Be silent.”
This prepares the next step of the argument: Keser, beyond even Moshe’s Chochmah, is likened to engraving, while the Sefiros of Atzilus, the root of the Written Torah, are likened to writing.
20וע״ד זה יובן ג״כ בכללות בחי׳ הכתר אפילו בצד היותו שרש לאצי׳ הוא למעלה מעלה ממהות ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דאצי׳ כי בו הוא הארת אור א״ס.
Along these lines it will also be understood that the level of Keser (the Crown) as a whole, even in the respect in which it is the root of Atzilus (Emanation), is far, far above the being of the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus, for in it is the radiance of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof).
Applying this to Keser as a whole: even the part of Keser that serves as the root of Atzilus is far above the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus, because the radiance of the Infinite Light is within it.
וזהו בחי׳ עתיק יומין ונמשך ממנו שרש לי״ס [לי׳ ספירות] דאצי׳ וזהו בחי׳ א״א, ולכן נמשל לחקיקה שהיא כאלו אין כאן שום דבר נוסף כלל זולת המהות שהיה קודם החקיקה כך הוא ג״כ עכשיו לאחר החקיקה
This is the level of Atik Yomin; and from it there is drawn forth a root for the ten Sefiros of Atzilus, which is the level of Arich Anpin. Therefore it is likened to engraving, which is as though nothing at all has been added here besides the being that was there before the engraving; so it is also now, after the engraving.
Keser’s upper part is Atik Yomin, and from it comes the root of the ten Sefiros of Atzilus, which is Arich Anpin. This is why Keser is likened to engraving: engraving adds nothing to the stone, and what was there before is all that is there afterward.
כך ג״כ התהוות בחי׳ ע״י [עתיק יומין] וא״א הם עדיין מכלל עולמות הא״ס,
So too the coming into being of the level of Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin: they are still within the worlds of the Infinite One (Ein Sof).
In the same way, Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin, as they come into being, remain within the “worlds of the Infinite One,” the levels still at one with G‑d’s infinity.
משא״כ בחי׳ התהוות י״ס [י׳ ספירות] דאצי׳ חכמה וחסד הרי כיון דאור א״ס לאו מכל אינון מדות1 איהו כלל2 וח״ע [וחכמה עילאה] כעשי׳ [כעשיה] גופניות נחשבת אצלו ית׳3 לכך נמשלו לאותיות הכתב שהדיו הוא דבר זר רק שנתאחד עם הקלף
This is not so with the coming into being of the ten Sefiros of Atzilus, Chochmah (wisdom) and Chesed (kindness): since the Infinite Light “is not of any of these attributes at all,” and the higher Chochmah is considered like physical action before Him, blessed be He, they are therefore likened to the letters of writing, where the ink is a foreign thing and has only become united with the parchment.
The Sefiros of Atzilus, such as Chochmah and Chesed, are different: the Tikkunei Zohar says that G‑d “is not of any of these attributes at all,” and even the higher Chochmah counts before Him as physical action, as Tanya (Part I, chapter 2) explains with the verse “You made them all with Chochmah.” So they are likened to written letters, whose ink is foreign to the parchment and only united with it.
משא״כ בחי׳ ע״י [עתיק יומין] וא״א נחשבו מבחי׳ א״ס כנ״ל בשם האר״י [האלקי רבי יצחק] ז״ל [זכרונו לברכה / זכרונם לברכה] שהוא בחי׳ ממוצע לכך לא נמשלו לאותיות הכתב רק לבחי׳ חקיקה.
Whereas the level of Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin is considered of the level of the Infinite One, as mentioned above in the name of the Arizal, of blessed memory, that it is an intermediary; therefore they are likened not to the letters of writing but to the level of engraving.
Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin, by contrast, count as part of the Infinite One, since, as the Arizal said, Keser is the intermediary; so they are likened not to writing but to engraving.
Keser, comprising Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin, is still part of G‑d’s infinity and is likened to engraving, while the Sefiros of Atzilus, which are as nothing before G‑d, are likened to ink on parchment.
Marei mekomos
- 1לאו מכל אינון מדות · ת״ז בהקדמה.
- 2לאו מכל אינון מדות איהו כלל · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:5–7
- 3וח״ע כעשי׳ גופנית נחשבת אצלו ית׳ · Psalms 104:24
21ואף גם שבאמת אינם ג״כ מערך ומהות עצם האור הנמשך מא״ס שהוא פשוט עדיין בתכלית
And even though in truth they too are not of the order and being of the very light drawn from the Infinite One (Ein Sof), which is still utterly simple,
He adds a qualification: Atik and Arich, too, are not the same as the utterly simple light drawn from the Infinite One.
ה״ז [הרי זה] כמשל החקיקה שכשרושמים וחוקקים על האבן טוב ונראה רשימות אין זה כמו עצם הפשוט ממש אך מ״מ אינו דבר זר כמו הדיו כו׳.
this is like the analogy of engraving: when one inscribes and engraves upon a precious stone and markings appear, this is not like the simple substance itself, yet nevertheless it is not a foreign thing like the ink, etc.
Engraving a gemstone also produces marks that are not the stone’s simple substance, yet they are not foreign to it as ink is to parchment.
וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] ע״ס [עשר ספירות] שבכתר עליון אין התחלקותם בבחי׳ הכתר נראית ונגלית ליש ודבר כלל מעצמות אור א״ס מאחר שהכתר יש בו עדיין מבחי׳ תחתונה שבאור א״ס רק שהם עד״מ כמו בחי׳ חקיקה ורושם בעלמא ומיוחדים בעצמות אא״ס [אור אין סוף]
So too the Ten Sefiros in the supreme Keser (Keser Elyon): their division, at the level of Keser, is not seen or revealed at all as an entity, a thing [apart] from the essence of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), since Keser still contains something of the lowest level of the Infinite Light; rather, they are, by way of analogy, like the level of a mere engraving and impression, and they are united with the essence of the Infinite Light.
So too the Ten Sefiros within Keser do not appear as distinct entities apart from the essence of the Infinite Light, since Keser still holds the lowest level of the Infinite Light. They are like a mere engraving, united with the essence of the Infinite Light.
(וכמו עד״מ שהשכל הגלוי מתגלה חוץ מהנפש משא״כ כח השכל כלול ומתאחד עם הנפש כו׳ אע״פ [אף על פי] שהנפש עצמה היא למעלה גם מכח השכל כמ״ש במ״א).
(Just as, by way of analogy, revealed intellect is revealed outside the soul, whereas the power of intellect is included and united with the soul, etc., although the soul itself is above even the power of intellect, as is explained elsewhere.)
The parenthesis gives a human parallel: revealed intellect comes out beyond the soul, while the power of intellect is included in the soul and one with it, even though the soul itself is higher still.
וזהו בריש הורמנותא דמלכא גליף גליפו. פי׳ בעלות הרצון לפניו להאציל הע״ס [העשר ספירות] אזי מתחלה גליף גליפו
This is [the meaning of] “At the very beginning of the King’s authority, He engraved engravings.” That is: when it arose in His will to emanate the Ten Sefiros, then first “He engraved engravings.”
This is the Zohar’s meaning: when it arose in G‑d’s will to emanate the Ten Sefiros, the first step was “He engraved engravings.”
הוא עד״מ התהוות בחי׳ חקיקה בהאור הפשוט לחקוק שרשי הע״ס [העשר ספירות] והיינו התהוות בחי׳ הכתר כנ״ל שזהו למעלה עדיין מהתהוות אותיות הכתב שהם ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דאצי׳.
This is, by way of analogy, the coming into being of the level of engraving in the simple light, to engrave the roots of the Ten Sefiros; that is, the coming into being of the level of Keser, as mentioned above, which is still above the coming into being of the letters of writing, which are the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus (Emanation).
That engraving is the forming, within the simple light, of the roots of the Ten Sefiros, that is, the coming into being of Keser. It comes before, and stands above, the “letters of writing,” the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus.
The Sefiros within Keser are like engraving in a gem: not identical with the simple light, but not foreign to it. The Zohar’s “He engraved engravings” is this first stage of emanation, before the “written” Sefiros of Atzilus.
22ותוכן הענין דבאצי׳ יש בחי׳ כלים ממש לאורות די״ס [די׳ ספירות] דלכך נמשלו לאותיות הכתב מדיו ע״ג [על גבי] קלף לבן שהדיו הוא משל לכלים שאינן ממהות אור הפשוט.
The substance of the matter is that in Atzilus (Emanation) there are actual vessels for the lights of the ten Sefiros; that is why they are likened to letters of writing, in ink upon white parchment, the ink being an analogy for the vessels, which are not of the being of the simple light.
Why Atzilus is “writing”: in Atzilus the Sefiros have actual vessels for their lights, and the vessels, like ink, are not of the nature of the simple light.
משא״כ בע״י [בעתיק יומין] וא״א הגם שיש בהם שרש לכלים די״ס [די׳ ספירות] אין הכלים ניכרים ונתגלים בהם עדיין אלא בהעלם גדול ונמשלו לאותיות החקיקה שאין כאן דבר זר כדיו כו׳.
This is not so in Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin: although there is in them a root for the vessels of the ten Sefiros, the vessels are not yet discernible and revealed in them, except in great concealment; so they are likened to the letters of engraving, where there is no foreign thing like ink, etc.
In Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin there is only a root for the vessels, deeply hidden and not yet discernible. So there is nothing foreign there like ink, and they are likened to engraving.
(ועמ״ש מזה ע״פ זאת חקת התורה)1 ומ״מ הגליפו לא היה רק בטה״ע [בטהירו עילאה] שהוא הארה בעלמא הנמשכת מאורו ית׳ הפשוט.
(See what is written about this on the verse “This is the statute of the Torah.”) Nevertheless, the engraving was only in the supernal brightness (tehiru ila’ah), which is a mere radiance drawn from His simple light, blessed be He.
The reader is referred to the discourse on “This is the statute of the Torah,” where the Alter Rebbe reads chukas (“statute”) as engraving: the Torah in its root is engraved letters, higher than the written letters of the Written Torah. Even so, the engraving took place only in the supernal brightness, a mere radiance of G‑d’s simple light.
שבחי׳ הארה זו היא ג״כ פשוט בתכלית הפשיטות ובה נחקקו בחי׳ הי״ס [הי׳ ספירות] דכתר אבל באור א״ס עצמו לא שייך כלל בחי׳ חקיקה וגליפו ח״ו [חס ושלום].
This radiance too is utterly simple, and in it the ten Sefiros of Keser (the Crown) were engraved; but in the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) itself engraving and inscription do not apply at all, G‑d forbid.
That radiance is itself utterly simple, and in it the ten Sefiros of Keser were engraved. In the Infinite Light itself, engraving does not apply at all.
The difference between writing and engraving Above is a matter of vessels: in Atzilus the vessels are revealed and are like ink, while in Keser they exist only as a hidden root, so its Sefiros are like engraving in the supernal brightness.
Marei mekomos
- 1ע״פ זאת חקת התורה · לקו״ת חקת נו, א.
The Written Torah and the Tablets ¶23–24
23וזהו ג״כ כללות ההפרש בין תורה שבכתב למכתב הלוחות כי פי׳ תורה שבכתב היינו שנתלבשה באותיות הכתב
This is also, in general, the difference between the Written Torah and the writing of the Tablets. For the meaning of “the Written Torah” is that it was clothed in the letters of writing,
This also explains, in general, how the Written Torah differs from the writing on the Tablets: the Written Torah is the Torah as it has been clothed in letters of writing.
כי התורה עצמה היא למעלה מהכתב כי תורה היא מבחי׳ יסוד אבא שעדיין יש בו הארת א״ס שמלובש בכתר כמ״ש ה׳ בחכמה1 ונק׳ בשם עדן
for the Torah itself is above writing, since the Torah is from the level of Yesod (foundation) of Abba, in which there is still the radiance of the Infinite One (Ein Sof) that is clothed in Keser (the Crown), as it is written, “Havayah, with Chochmah,” and it is called by the name Eden;
The Torah in itself is higher than writing. It comes from the Yesod of Abba, the channel of Chochmah, which still holds the radiance of the Infinite One that is clothed in Keser, as the verse “Havayah, with Chochmah [founded the earth]” indicates. This level of Chochmah is called “Eden.”
only, it was clothed in Binah (understanding), where there is the level of letters, as is written about this in the explanation on the verse “And you shall make a tzitz,” regarding “and you shall engrave.”
The Torah became letters only when it was clothed in Binah, where letters exist. Torah Ohr explains this on the verse “And you shall make a tzitz,” the gold headplate of the High Priest engraved with “Holy to Havayah”: Chochmah is a formless flash, and only Binah has letters.
The Written Torah originates in the Yesod of Abba, in Chochmah, and becomes written letters only as it is clothed in Binah.
Marei mekomos
- 1ה׳ בחכמה · Proverbs 3:19
- 2בביאור ע״פ ועשית ציץ · תו״א פד, א ”כי הרי החכמה היא בחי׳ ברק ואין בה שום תמונה, רק בינה היא יש ושייך בה בחי׳ אותיות”.
- 3ועשית ציץ · Exodus 28:36
24והיינו ג״ן סדרים דאורייתא נמשכים מבחי׳ נהר היוצא מעדן1 וגם האותיות אלו שהן הכלים הרי איהו וגרמוהי חד בהון2 כו׳. אמנם הלוחות שרשם בבחי׳ כתר עליון.
That is, the fifty-three [written as gan, “garden”] portions of the Torah are drawn from the level of “a river going out of Eden.” And also these letters, which are the vessels: “He and His vessels (ihu vegarmohi) are one in them,” etc. But the root of the Tablets is in the level of the supreme Keser (Keser Elyon).
The fifty-three portions of the Torah, a number written ג״ן (“garden”), flow from Binah, “the river going out of Eden” to water the garden. Their letters are vessels, and in Atzilus “He and His vessels are one,” yet the Tablets have a higher root, in the supreme Keser.
וזהו ענין עשרת הדברות שניתנו בחג השבועות לפי שאז הוא ההתגלות והמשכת הכתר מבחי׳ א״א ועתיק יומין ממש בז״א כמבואר בפע״ח [בפרי עץ חיים]
This is the matter of the Ten Commandments, which were given on the festival of Shavuos, because then there is the revelation and drawing down of Keser, from the very level of Arich Anpin and Atik Yomin, into Z’eir Anpin (the emotive attributes), as is explained in Pri Etz Chaim.
That is why the Ten Commandments were given on Shavuos: on that day Keser, from Arich Anpin and Atik Yomin, is revealed and drawn down into Z’eir Anpin, as Pri Etz Chaim, Rabbi Chaim Vital’s record of the Arizal’s teachings on prayer and the festivals, explains.
כי כל ימי הספירה הוא הגדלת המוחין דז״א בהשלמת מוחין דאו״א [דאבא ואימא] המתלבשים בז״א גדלות ראשון וגדלות שני.
For all the days of the Counting [of the Omer] are the growth of the intellect (mochin) of Z’eir Anpin, in the completion of the mochin of Abba and Imma that are clothed in Z’eir Anpin: the first state of maturity and the second state of maturity.
During the forty-nine days of counting the Omer, between Pesach and Shavuos, the intellect (mochin) of Z’eir Anpin grows, as it receives the mochin of Abba and Imma in two stages of maturity.
אך בשבועות מאיר בו בחי׳ גלגלתא שהוא בחי׳ הכתר שמקבל מא״א [מאריך אנפין] וע״י [ועתיק יומין] ממש ואז דוקא ניתנו שני הלוחות שבהם עשרת הדברות
But on Shavuos there shines in it the level of the Gulgalta (“skull”), which is the level of Keser, which receives from Arich Anpin and Atik Yomin themselves; and specifically then were the two Tablets given, on which were the Ten Commandments.
On Shavuos something higher shines in Z’eir Anpin: the Gulgalta, the “skull,” the level of Keser, which receives directly from Arich Anpin and Atik Yomin. Precisely then the two Tablets, bearing the Ten Commandments, were given.
ע״כ היה המכתב חרות על הלוחות בחי׳ אותיות החקיקה כמו שהוא בחי׳ ומדרגת הכתר שהיא בחי׳ גליף גליפו בט הירו עילאה כנ״ל.
Therefore “the writing” was “engraved upon the Tablets,” the level of the letters of engraving, as is the level and rank of Keser, which is the level of “He engraved engravings in the supernal brightness,” as mentioned above.
So the writing on the Tablets was engraved, matching the level of Keser, the Zohar’s “He engraved engravings in the supernal brightness.”
(ולכן יש ג״כ תר״ך אותיות בעשרת הדברות כמנין כתר וכמ״ש הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] פ׳ אמור ד׳ צ״ו ע״ב וברבות נשא פי״ג איתא תרי״ג אותיות יש3 מן אנכי עד אשר לרעך ושבעה יתירות כנגד שבעה ימי בראשית4 עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו]):
(That is also why there are six hundred and twenty letters in the Ten Commandments, the numerical value of Keser, as the Ramaz writes on Parshas Emor, folio 96b. And in [Midrash] Rabbah on Nasso, chapter 13, it says: “There are six hundred and thirteen letters from ‘I am’ until ‘which is your neighbor’s,’ and seven extra, corresponding to the seven days of Creation”; end of quote.)
A sign of this: the Ten Commandments contain 620 letters, the numerical value of כתר, Keser (kaf 20, tav 400, reish 200), as the Ramaz, Rabbi Moshe Zacuto, notes in his glosses on the Zohar. The Midrash counts 613 letters from “I am” to “which is your neighbor’s,” corresponding to the 613 mitzvos, and seven more for the seven days of Creation, making 620.
The letters of the Written Torah stem from Binah, while the Tablets stem from Keser, which is revealed on Shavuos; so their writing was engraved, and the Ten Commandments have 620 letters, the value of Keser.
Marei mekomos
- 1נהר היוצא מעדן · Genesis 2:10
- 2איהו וגרמוהי חד בהון · Tikkunei Zohar 3b:9–10
- 3וברבות נשא פי״ג . . תרי״ג אותיות יש · ראה ד״ה ויחי יעקב תרמ״ד ע׳ רכא.
- 4אותיות יש מן אנכי עד אשר לרעך ושבעה יתירות כנגד שבעה ימי בראשית · Bamidbar Rabbah 13:16
The soul’s root beyond the River ¶25–30
25ד ועתה נבוא לביאור הפסוק אם בחקותי תלכו דמבואר לעיל דכיון דתלת קשרין אינון1 כו׳ ע״כ כמו שבתורה יש ב׳ בחי׳ הנ״ל כתיבה וחקיקה דהיינו התושב״כ [התורה שבכתב] והלוחות
4. Now we come to the explanation of the verse “If you walk in My statutes.” As was explained above, since “there are three bonds,” etc., therefore, just as in the Torah there are the two levels mentioned above, writing and engraving, that is, the Written Torah and the Tablets,
Section 4 turns to the verse itself. The preceding discourse (Likkutei Torah, Bechukosai 1:2) cited the Zohar’s teaching that the Holy One, blessed be He, the Torah and Israel are three bonds tied together, so whatever is in the Torah has its counterpart in Israel. Since the Torah has both writing, the Written Torah, and engraving, the Tablets, Israel has both as well.
כמו כן בכל ניצוץ ונפש אלקית יש ג״כ ב׳ בחי׳ אלו אותיות החקוקים ואותיות הכתובים דהנה אנו אומרים נשמה שנתת בי טהורה היא23 אתה בראתה כו׳,
so too in every spark and G‑dly soul there are also these two levels, engraved letters and written letters. For we say, “The soul that You have given within me, it is pure; You created it,” etc.
Every G‑dly soul, every “spark,” likewise has engraved letters and written letters. The morning blessing hints at this: “The soul that You have given within me, it is pure; You created it.”
וידוע הקושיא איך שייך לומר טהורה היא קודם שבראתה ואיפכא הל״ל [הוה ליה למימר] אתה בראתה טהורה היא כו׳.
There is a known question: how can one say “it is pure” before “You created it”? It should have said the reverse: “You created it; it is pure,” etc.
The blessing raises a known difficulty. A soul must be created before it can be called pure, so the order should seem to be “You created it; it is pure.”
והענין יובן בהקדים4 ביאור הפסוק (ביהושע כ״ד ב׳) ויאמר יהושע אל כל העם כה אמר ה׳ אלהי ישראל בעבר הנהר ישבו אבותיכם מעולם5 כו׳
The matter will be understood by first explaining the verse (in Joshua 24:2), “And Yehoshua said to all the people: Thus says Havayah, the G‑d of Israel: Your fathers dwelt beyond the River of old,” etc.,
To answer, he first explains Yehoshua’s words to the people: “Thus says Havayah, the G‑d of Israel: Your fathers dwelt beyond the River of old.”
ואקח את אביכם את אברהם מעבר הנהר ואולך אותו בכל ארץ כנען6
“and I took your father Avraham from beyond the River and led him through all the land of Canaan.”
The passage continues, “I took your father Avraham from beyond the River and led him through all the land of Canaan.”
ומבואר הקושיא ע״ז בזהר (פ׳ אמור צ״ח ב׳) מאי קמ״ל [קא משמע לן] בזה וכי כל ישראל לא ידעו זה7 ומלשון הפסוק נראה שהוא דבר גדול ומחודש אפילו לגבי יהושע עד שצריך שה׳ יאמר אותו.
The question on this is set out in the Zohar (Parshas Emor, 98b): what does this teach us? Did not all Israel know this? Yet from the wording of the verse it appears to be a great and novel matter, even for Yehoshua, so much so that G‑d had to say it.
The Zohar raises a question about these verses: every Jew knew where Avraham came from, so what are they teaching? Their tone suggests a great and new revelation, one that G‑d Himself had to announce, even to Yehoshua.
ותירץ בזה״ק [בזהר הקדוש]8 כי באמת דבר גדול דיבר הנביא בהודעה זו והוא ע״ד ישראל עלו במחשבה9101112 דהכוונה ששרשם נמשך מבחי׳ מחשבה סתימאה דא״א
The holy Zohar answers that the prophet truly spoke of a great matter in this announcement. It is along the lines of “Israel arose in thought,” meaning that their root is drawn from the level of the hidden thought of Arich Anpin,
The Zohar answers that the prophet was announcing something great: G‑d chose Israel through the Patriarchs and brought them out from “the supernal river.” The Alter Rebbe connects it with the Sages’ saying “Israel arose in thought”: the root of Israel’s souls lies in the hidden thought of Arich Anpin.
שהיא למעלה מעלה מבחי׳ סתם מחשבה עילאה ותתאה. דהיינו כי מחשבה תתאה הוא שחושב מה שמדבר.
which is far, far above the level of higher and lower thought as such. That is: lower thought is when one thinks what one is saying.
This hidden thought is far above ordinary thought, whether higher or lower. As explained earlier, lower thought is thinking the words one is about to say.
Section 4 begins the explanation of the verse. Like the Torah, the soul has engraved and written letters, a point hinted in the blessing “it is pure; You created it” and in Yehoshua’s “Your fathers dwelt beyond the River,” which the Zohar reads as a revelation of Israel’s root, here identified with the hidden thought of Arich Anpin.
The Rebbe Rashab’s maamar Vayomer Yehoshua 5657, which the Kehot notes cite, quotes the Zohar’s answer: the Holy One, blessed be He, did Israel a great kindness in choosing them through the Patriarchs and making them a holy, supernal chariot for His glory. The Rebbe, in a maamar of 5720, stresses the word “arose”: not that Israel was in thought, but that within thought itself they are its most exalted level.
Marei mekomos
- 1תלת קשרין אינון · Zohar, Achrei Mot 49:296–50:305
- 2נשמה שנתת בי טהורה היא · ברכת השחר.
- 3נשמה שנתת בי טהורה היא · Berakhot 60b:4
- 4והענין יובן בהקדים · מכאן ראה ד״ה ויאמר יהושע תרנ״ז ע׳ ס ואילך.
- 5
- 6ואקח את אביכם את אברהם מעבר הנהר ואולך אותו בכל ארץ כנען · Joshua 24:3
- 7וכי כל ישראל לא ידעו זה · Zohar, Emor 35:171–38:188
- 8ותירץ בזה״ק · ”ותירץ שמודיע לנו בזה דטיבו סגי עביד קוב״ה בישראל דאיתרעי בהוא באבהתא ועביד לו רתיכא קדישא עילאה ליקרי׳ כו׳” — סה״מ תרנ״ז ע׳ ס.
- 9במחשבה — כדלעיל באריכות · פ״ג [כ].
- 10עלו במחשבה מבחי׳ מחשבה סתימאה · נתבאר באריכות בסה״מ תרנ״ז שם ע׳ סד ואילך.
- 11ישראל עלו במחשבה · ”עלו דוקא, שאינו אומר היו במחשבה, כ״א עלו במחשבה היינו שבבחינת המחשבה גופא הם בבחי׳ היותר נעלה שבמחשבה” — ד״ה ויאמר יהושע תש״כ (הנחה).
- 12ישראל עלו במחשבה · Bereshit Rabbah 1:4
26ומחשבה עילאה היא מחשבת השכל. וכ״ז [וכל זה] הנמשל למעלה בבחי׳ ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דאצי׳ הנה אפי׳ [אפילו] מחשבה עילאה הוא בחי׳ בינה.
And higher thought is the thinking of the concept. And all this, as it is represented Above, in the level of the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus (Emanation): even higher thought is the level of Binah (understanding).
Higher thought is thinking the concept itself. Among the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus, even higher thought corresponds only to Binah.
והוא הנק׳ נהר היוצא מעדן1 כי המחשבה אינה נחה כמו שהנהר נמשך תמיד ונמשכת מעדן היא בחי׳ ח״ע [חכמה עילאה].
It is what is called “a river going out of Eden,” for thought does not rest, just as a river flows continually; and it is drawn from Eden, which is the level of the higher Chochmah (wisdom).
Binah is called “the river going out of Eden,” because thought never rests but flows like a river. Its source, Eden, is the higher Chochmah.
אמנם ענין עלו במחשבה הוא בחי׳ ח״ס [חכמה סתימאה] דא״א שלמעלה מעלה מח״ע [מחכמה עילאה] דאצי׳ כדלעיל באריכות בפי׳ שתוק כך עלה במחשבה.
But the matter of “arose in thought” is the level of the hidden Chochmah of Arich Anpin, which is far, far above the higher Chochmah of Atzilus, as explained above at length in the explanation of “Be silent; thus it arose in thought.”
“Arose in thought,” however, refers to the hidden Chochmah of Arich Anpin, far above the higher Chochmah of Atzilus, as explained earlier in connection with “Be silent; thus it arose in thought.”
וא״כ אמרם ז״ל [זכרונו לברכה / זכרונם לברכה] עלו במחשבה היינו ששרש נשמתם מושרש ונמשך מבחי׳ מחשבה סתימאה דא״א שלמעלה מחו״ב [מחכמה ובינה] דאצי׳
If so, the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, “they arose in thought,” means that the root of their souls is rooted in and drawn from the level of the hidden thought of Arich Anpin, which is above Chochmah and Binah of Atzilus
So when the Sages say Israel “arose in thought,” they mean that the root of Jewish souls is in the hidden thought of Arich Anpin, above Chochmah and Binah of Atzilus.
(ועיין בזהר פ׳ נח דף ס״ה ע״א ובפרדס בעה״כ [בערכי הכינויים] ערך מחשבה).2 וזהו ג״כ ענין הודעה זו שהודיעם ה׳ איך כי בעבר הנהר ישבו אבותיכם מעולם.
(and see the Zohar, Parshas Noach, folio 65a, and the Pardes, Erchei HaKinuyim, entry “Machshavah”). This is also the matter of this announcement that G‑d made to them, how “your fathers dwelt beyond the River of old”:
The parenthesis refers to the Zohar and to Erchei HaKinuyim, the part of Rabbi Moshe Cordovero’s Pardes Rimonim that explains Kabbalistic terms, under “thought.” This same root is what G‑d announced through Yehoshua: “Your fathers dwelt beyond the River of old.”
ר״ל [רוצה לומר] ששרשם נמשך מבחי׳ שלמעלה מבחי׳ נהר היוצא מעדן שהיא בחי׳ בינה. כי פי׳ בעבר ר״ל [רוצה לומר] בעבר השני כשעוברים הנהר ובעבר השני שם ישבו אבותיכם.
that is to say, their root is drawn from a level above the level of “a river going out of Eden,” which is the level of Binah. For “beyond” (be’ever) means on the other side, when one crosses the river; on the other side, there “your fathers dwelt.”
The “River” is Binah, “the river going out of Eden.” “Beyond the River” means its far side, the side one reaches by crossing it; there, above Binah, the Patriarchs “dwelt.”
Higher thought is Binah, the “river” flowing from Chochmah. Israel’s root is in the hidden thought of Arich Anpin, above both, and this is the far side of the River where “your fathers dwelt.”
Marei mekomos
- 1נהר היוצא מעדן · Genesis 2:10
- 2ובפרדס בעה״כ ערך מחשבה · נעתק באוה״ת בראשית-ד דף תשמ, ב.
27והיינו בבחי׳ א״א שלמעלה מהאצי׳ כי פרסא מפסיק בינו לאצי׳ כמ״ש במ״א בענין עד הגל12 כו׳ ומעבר להפרסא מושרשים האבות.
That is, in the level of Arich Anpin, which is above Atzilus (Emanation), for a curtain (parsa) divides between it and Atzilus, as is explained elsewhere on “The heap is witness,” etc. And beyond the curtain the Patriarchs are rooted.
The far side of the River is Arich Anpin, above Atzilus and separated from it by a “curtain” (parsa), as explained elsewhere on the boundary heap between Yaakov and Lavan, “The heap is witness.” The Patriarchs are rooted beyond that curtain.
והענין כי ידוע דאברהם יצחק ויעקב הם בחי׳ חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] אמנם שרשם הוא בחי׳ חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א.3
Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov embody Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes: love, awe and compassion. Their root, however, is the Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin, above Atzilus.
The Patriarchs, who embody Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes, are rooted in those attributes as they exist in Arich Anpin, beyond the curtain that separates it from Atzilus.
Marei mekomos
- 1כמ״ש במ״א בענין עד הגל · סדור עם דא״ח דש, ד. בהפסק שבין בחי׳ לובן העליון ליעקב בעל האצי׳.
- 2עד הגל · Genesis 31:52
- 3דאברהם יצחק ויעקב . . חג״ת דא״א · ראה בהנסמן בספר הערכים-חב״ד כרך א ע׳ יח.
28והוא ענין טורי נהורא וטורי חשוכא1 הנזכר בזהר2 דהיינו חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דאצי׳ נק׳ טורי נהורא והם בחי׳ המדות הנמשכים מן השכל וההתבוננות שע״י השכל וההתבוננות נולד האהבה או היראה,
This is the matter of “mountains of light” and “mountains of darkness” mentioned in the Zohar. That is: Chesed (kindness), Gevurah (restraint) and Tiferes (beauty) of Atzilus (Emanation) are called “mountains of light,” and they are the level of the emotive attributes (middos) drawn from intellect and contemplation, for through intellect and contemplation love or awe is born.
The Zohar speaks of “mountains of light” and “mountains of darkness.” The mountains of light are Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Atzilus: emotions born of understanding and contemplation, as when reflecting on G‑d produces love or awe.
אך יש בחי׳ אהבה רבה שלמעלה מהשכל ונק׳ טורי חשוכא שהם המדות הכלולים בהרצון שלמעלה מהשכל וכענין שתוק כך עלה במחשבה כו׳.
But there is a level of great love (ahavah rabbah) that is above intellect, and it is called “mountains of darkness”: these are the attributes included in the will (ratzon) that is above intellect, as in “Be silent; thus it arose in thought,” etc.
The mountains of darkness are a great love above intellect: emotions contained within the will that transcends understanding. They are “dark” in that understanding cannot reach them, like the answer “Be silent; thus it arose in thought”; Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim, identifies them with the Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin.
וזהו ענין ג׳ ידות3 יד הגדולה4 ויד החזקה56 ויד הרמה7 וכנודע שבחי׳ חו״ג [חסד וגבורה] דא״א מתלבשים באו״א [באבא ואימא] ומהם נמשך אח״כ בחג״ת [בחסד גבורה תפארת] דאצי׳.
This is the matter of the three “hands”: “the great hand,” “the strong hand” and “the high hand.” As is known, the level of Chesed and Gevurah of Arich Anpin is clothed in Abba and Imma, and from them it is afterward drawn into Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Atzilus.
This is the meaning of the Torah’s three “hands”: the great hand (Exodus 14:31), the strong hand (Exodus 6:1) and the high hand (Exodus 14:8, where Israel went out “with a high hand”). As is known, Chesed and Gevurah of Arich Anpin are clothed in Abba and Imma, and through them reach Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Atzilus.
Emotions born of understanding are the “mountains of light”; love above understanding, within the will of Arich Anpin, is the “mountains of darkness,” the root of the Patriarchs, and this is the meaning of the three “hands.”
The discourse in Likkutei Torah, Nasso, to which the Kehot note points, explains the three hands at length: the great hand is “abundant in kindness,” the strong hand is “His left hand under my head,” and the high hand, from the word for exaltation, belongs to the sons of Kehas, who carried the Ark and the Tablets.
Marei mekomos
- 1טורי נהורא וטורי חשוכא · Zohar, Pinchas 104:696–105:706
- 2טורי נהורא וטורי חשוכא הנזכר בזהר · ח״ג רמט, ב. ועל״ק בשה״ש טו, ג. [כ].
- 3שלמעלה — ג׳ ידות · ראה לקמן פ׳ נשא כא, ב בארוכה.
- 4יד הגדולה · Exodus 14:31
- 5יד החזקה · שם ו, א.
- 6יד החזקה · Exodus 6:1
- 7יד הרמה · שם יד, ח.
29והנה המדות שלמעלה מהשכל הם בבחי׳ התכללות מאד וכנ״ל שבכתר אין שייך התחלקות עדיין.
Now, the attributes (middos) that are above intellect are in a state of great inter-inclusion, as mentioned above, that in Keser (the Crown) division does not yet apply.
Emotions that transcend intellect are not yet divided into separate attributes; each contains the others, for in Keser there is no division.
וזהו ואקח את אביכם את אברהם מעבר הנהר ואולך אותו בכל ארץ כנען1 פי׳ ארץ כנען הוא המל׳ דאצי׳ לשון תגר וסוחר ולשון הכנעה כמ״ש במ״א.2
This is [the meaning of] “And I took your father Avraham from beyond the River and led him through all the land of Canaan.” That is: “the land of Canaan” (Kenaan) is the Malchus (sovereignty) of Atzilus (Emanation), a term meaning “merchant” and “trader,” and a term of submission (hachna’ah), as is explained elsewhere.
Now the next verse: “I took your father Avraham from beyond the River and led him through all the land of Canaan.” The land of Canaan is Malchus of Atzilus; the word Kenaan can mean “merchant,” and it also echoes hachna’ah, submission. In Torah Ohr, Vayeshev, the Alter Rebbe explains that Canaan means a merchant, who spends his money in order to gain more, and calls Malchus “the supernal Canaan of holiness.”
והכוונה שהמשיך את האבות משרשם שבעבר הנהר לירד למטה בכל האצי׳ (דהיינו כנ״ל שחג״ת [שחסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א מתלבשים באו״א [באבא ואימא] ומשם בזו״נ [בזעיר אנפין ונוקבא])
The intent is that He drew the Patriarchs from their root beyond the River, to descend below through all of Atzilus (that is, as mentioned above, the Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin are clothed in Abba and Imma, and from there in Z’eir Anpin and Nukva),
G‑d drew the Patriarchs down from their root beyond the River through all of Atzilus: from Arich Anpin into Abba and Imma, and from there into Z’eir Anpin and Nukva.
עד המל׳ כדי להתלבש בבי״ע בגופים בעוה״ז לברר ברורי רפ״ח נצוצין שנפלו בבי״ע וירידה זו צורך עלייה היא שיעלו הרפ״ח ניצוצות לשרשן ומקורן
down to Malchus, in order to be clothed in Beriah (Creation), Yetzirah (Formation) and Asiyah (Action), in bodies in this world, to refine the refinements of the two hundred and eighty-eight sparks that fell into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah. And this descent is for the sake of ascent: that the two hundred and eighty-eight sparks ascend to their root and source
They descended to Malchus and from there into the lower worlds, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, into bodies in this world. The purpose was to refine and raise the 288 sparks of holiness that fell into those worlds, so the descent is for the sake of an ascent.
(וכמשנ״ת [וכמו שנתבאר] ענין זה ג״כ בד״ה לך לך3 הנה אב רם הוא שכל הנעלם כו׳) אברהם ע״י בחי׳ האהבה ויצחק בבחי׳ יראה ויעקב בחי׳ רחמנות.
(as this matter was also explained in the discourse beginning “Go forth,” [where] “Av ram” [“exalted father”] is the hidden intellect, etc.): Avraham through the level of love, Yitzchak through the level of awe, and Yaakov through the level of compassion.
This was also explained in Torah Ohr, in the discourse on “Go forth” (Lech Lecha), where Avram, “Av ram,” “exalted father,” is the hidden intellect, which must come into revelation step by step. Avraham refines the sparks through love, Yitzchak through awe, and Yaakov through compassion.
וזהו ענין אם בחקותי תלכו שהיא בחי׳ ההליכה ממטה למעלה ובפרט העיקר ע״י מדת רחמנות בחי׳ נחלה בלי מצרים4 כו׳
This is the matter of “If you walk in My statutes”: it is the level of “walking” from below upward, and in particular, principally, through the attribute of compassion, the level of “an inheritance without bounds,” etc.
This is the meaning of “If you walk in My statutes”: walking from below upward, back to the root. Above all it happens through compassion, Yaakov’s attribute, which the Sages call “an inheritance without bounds.”
(וכמ״ש במ״א ע״פ המאמר וישב5 ד׳ קפ״א וגבה מאד מסטרא דיעקב6 כו׳ ע״ש וע׳ במ״ש בד״ה כנשר יעיר7 וע׳ לעיל פ׳ ויצא בד״ה והיה הוי׳ לי לאלקים8 כו׳ וכל אשר תתן לי עשר אעשרנו לך9 כו׳).
(As is explained elsewhere on the statement [of the Zohar], Vayeshev, folio 181, “And very high: from the side of Yaakov,” etc.; see there. And see what is written in the discourse beginning “As an eagle stirs up,” and see above, Parshas Vayetzei, in the discourse beginning “And Havayah will be my G‑d,” etc., “and of all that You give me I will surely tithe to You,” etc.)
The parenthesis cites the Zohar on the verse “He shall be exalted and lifted up and very high”: the word “very” (me’od) is from the side of Yaakov. It also refers to the discourses on “As an eagle stirs up its nest” and on Yaakov’s vow, “Havayah will be my G‑d.”
וזהו ג״כ ענין נשמה שנתת בי טהורה היא כי הנה בחי׳ שרשם בעבר הנהר היינו בחי׳ אותיות החקיקה כנ״ל דבחי׳ מחשבה סתימאה נק׳ גליף גליפו בטה״ע [בטהירו עילאה]
This is also the matter of “The soul that You have given within me, it is pure”: for the level of their root, beyond the River, is the level of the letters of engraving, as mentioned above, since the level of hidden thought is called “He engraved engravings in the supernal brightness (tehiru ila’ah).”
The same root explains “The soul that You have given within me, it is pure.” The soul’s root beyond the River is the level of engraved letters, since hidden thought is what the Zohar calls “He engraved engravings in the supernal brightness.”
וזהו פי׳ טהורה היא שנמשכה מבחי׳ טהירו עילאה והיינו ממש ענין בעבר הנהר ישבו אבותיכם.
This is the meaning of “it is pure” (tehorah): that it is drawn from the level of the supernal brightness (tehiru ila’ah). And this is exactly the matter of “your fathers dwelt beyond the River.”
“It is pure” (tehorah) alludes to tehiru, the supernal brightness, from which the soul is drawn. This is exactly what “your fathers dwelt beyond the River” means.
The Patriarchs’ descent from beyond the River through Atzilus into bodies serves to raise the fallen sparks, and their “walking” back up, chiefly through compassion, is “If you walk in My statutes.” The soul’s root there, its engraved letters, is why the blessing first says “it is pure.”
Marei mekomos
- 1ואקח את אביכם את אברהם מעבר הנהר ואולך אותו בכל ארץ כנען · Joshua 24:3
- 2הכנעה כמ״ש במ״א · ראה תו״א כו, ג ואילך, ובהגהות לזה באוה״ת בראשית.
- 3בד״ה לך לך · תו״א יא, א ואילך.
- 4נחלה בלי מצרים · Shabbat 118a:7–8
- 5במ״א ע״פ המאמר וישב · ביאה״ז לאדה״א כב, ג. ועם הגהות בביאה״ז לצ״צ ע׳ קיח ואילך.
- 6וגבה מאד מסטרא דיעקב · Zohar, Vayeshev 5:44–57
- 7כנשר יעיר · Deuteronomy 32:11
- 8והיה הוי׳ לי לאלקים · Genesis 28:21
- 9וכל אשר תתן לי עשר אעשרנו לך · Genesis 28:22
30ואח״כ כשירדה למטה כמ״ש ואולך אותו בכל ארץ כנען הוא ענין אתה בראתה יצרתה בחי׳ השתלשלות בי״ע עד שנפחתה בי והשתלשלות זו היינו בחי׳ אותיות הכתב
Afterward, when it descended below, as it is written, “and I led him through all the land of Canaan,” this is the matter of “You created it, You formed it,” the level of the chain of descent (hishtalshelus) through Beriah (Creation), Yetzirah (Formation) and Asiyah (Action), until “You breathed it into me.” And this chain of descent is the level of the letters of writing.
After the soul’s root comes its descent, as in “and I led him through all the land of Canaan.” This is “You created it, You formed it… You breathed it into me”: the soul’s passage down through Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah into the body, and that descent is the level of written letters.
נמצא יש בישראל ג״כ ב׳ מדרגות מצד שרשן טהורה היא הם בחי׳ אותיות החקיקה ומצד השתלשלותן למטה בבחי׳ בראתה יצרתה נפחתה בי1 זהו ענין אותיות הכתב.
It follows that in Israel, too, there are two levels: from the side of their root, “it is pure,” they are the level of the letters of engraving; and from the side of their descent below, at the level of “You created it, You formed it, You breathed it into me,” this is the matter of the letters of writing.
So every Jew has two levels. In its root, “it is pure,” the soul is engraved letters, one with its source; in its descent, “You created it, You formed it, You breathed it into me,” it is written letters. This answers the question: “it is pure” comes first because the root precedes the descent.
The soul has two levels, its engraved root, “it is pure,” and its written descent, “You created it, You formed it, You breathed it into me,” which explains why “pure” comes first in the blessing.
Marei mekomos
- 1בראתה יצרתה נפחתה בי · Berakhot 60b:4
Walking in My statutes ¶31–32
31ולהבין ענין ב׳ בחי׳ אלו בעבודת ה׳ הוא כי יש בחי׳ אהבה הנמשכת מצד הבינה והדעת בגדולת ה׳.
To understand these two levels in the service of G‑d: there is a level of love that is drawn from Binah (understanding) and Daas (knowledge) of the greatness of G‑d.
Now the two levels are applied to the service of G‑d. One kind of love for G‑d is born of understanding and knowledge, from contemplating His greatness.
אמנם עיקר בחי׳ האהבה אינה מצד הדעת וההתבוננות כי אנו רואים שגדול כח הרצון והאהבה יותר מערך השכל וההתבוננות שהרי אפילו קל שבקלים יכול למסור נפשו על קדש״ה [קדושת השם] שלא מצד ערך ההתבוננות כלל
However, the essential level of love does not come from knowledge and contemplation. For we see that the power of will and love is greater than anything commensurate with intellect and contemplation, since even the lowest of the low can give up his life (mesirus nefesh) for the sanctification of G‑d’s Name, not at all by virtue of contemplation.
But love in its essence does not come from contemplation. The proof: even the least worthy Jew is ready to give his life for the sanctification of G‑d’s Name, which no amount of contemplation could account for.
נמצא שעצם הרצון בכל נפש לה׳ זהו למעלה מהדעת רק שעובר דרך מעבר ע״י השכל והדעת ולכך בלי התבוננות לא יומשך בגילוי.
It follows that the very will (ratzon) for G‑d in every soul is above knowledge; only, it passes through intellect and knowledge as through a passageway, and therefore without contemplation it will not be drawn forth into revelation.
So the essential will for G‑d in every soul is above knowledge. It passes through intellect and knowledge on its way out, which is why without contemplation it does not become revealed.
אבל מ״מ עצם שרש הרצון הוא למעלה מהדעת. וזהו מצד בחי׳ נשמה שנתת בי טהורה היא
Nevertheless, the very root of the will is above knowledge. And this is from the level of “The soul that You have given within me, it is pure”
Still, the root of that will is above knowledge. It comes from the soul’s root, of which the blessing says, “it is pure.”
(והיא בחי׳ אהבת הבן אל האב שנתבאר במ״א1 מפני שהוי׳ אלהינו ממש כו׳. וזהו בחינת חטה שאין התינוק יודע23 כו׳ כמ״ש במ״א).
(and it is the level of the love of a son for his father, which is explained elsewhere, because Havayah is truly our G‑d, etc. And this is the level of “wheat,” for “an infant does not know,” etc., as is explained elsewhere).
This is the love of a son for his father, explained elsewhere, which comes because “Havayah is our G‑d,” truly our own. It is also linked with “wheat,” after the Sages’ saying that an infant does not know how to call “father” and “mother” until it tastes grain; this too is explained elsewhere.
וזהו אם בחקותי תלכו בחוקים שחקקתי לכם היינו בחי׳ חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א ששם שרש האבות ע״כ ביכולתם לרעות צאנם ולהביאם למקור זה הנק׳ חקיקות ואז תלכו בבחי׳ מהלך בלתי שיעור וגבול.
This is [the meaning of] “If you walk in My statutes”: in the statutes (chukim) that I have engraved (chakakti) for you, that is, the level of Chesed (kindness), Gevurah (restraint) and Tiferes (beauty) of Arich Anpin, where the root of the Patriarchs is. Therefore they are able to pasture their flock and bring them to this source, which is called “engravings,” and then “you will walk,” at the level of a walking without measure or limit.
So “If you walk in My statutes” means: in the statutes I have engraved for you, the Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin, where the Patriarchs are rooted. The Patriarchs, as shepherds, can lead their flock, the Jewish souls, to that source, and then the soul’s walking is without measure or limit.
וכמ״ש הנה ישכיל עבדי4 כו׳ וגבה מאד ופי׳ מאד בלי גבול היינו בבחי׳ א״ס (ועמ״ש ע״פ הזהר וישב הנ״ל) וזה הגילוי יהיה לע״ל [לעתיד לבוא].
As it is written, “Behold, My servant shall be wise,” etc., “and very high”; and the meaning of “very” (me’od) is without limit, that is, at the level of the Infinite One (Ein Sof) (see what is written on the Zohar on Vayeshev mentioned above). And this revelation will be in the Time to Come.
The verse “Behold, My servant shall be wise… and very high” shows this: “very” (me’od) means without limit, the level of the Infinite One. This revelation belongs to the Time to Come.
והיינו ע״י אהבת בכל מאדך5 בבחי׳ הילוך בתוספת אור דבר יום ביומו וכל א׳ מוכרח לבא אל אמיתית שרשו ומקורו בבחי׳ חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א הנק׳ בחקותי כי לא ידח ממנו נדח6 ממנו ממש ממהותו ועצמותו ית׳.
That is, through the love of “with all your might” (bechol me’odecha), at the level of walking, with an increase of light, “each day’s matter on its day.” And every one is bound to come to the truth of his root and source, at the level of Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin, which are called “My statutes,” for “the banished one shall not be banished from Him”: truly from Him, from His being and essence, blessed be He.
It is reached through love “with all your might” (bechol me’odecha), with light increasing day by day. Every soul must eventually reach its true root, for, in the verse’s words, “the banished one shall not be banished from Him,” from G‑d’s very being and essence.
Love that comes from contemplation belongs to the soul’s “written” level, while its essential will, above knowledge, is its “engraved” root. Walking “in My statutes” is the soul’s limitless ascent to that root through love “with all your might.”
Marei mekomos
- 1שנתבאר — במ״א · עיין לעיל בהוספות יח, ג הערת כ״ק אדמו״ר מהורש״ב נ״ע.
- 2שאין התינוק יודע · ברכות מ, סע״א.
- 3שאין התינוק יודע · Berakhot 40a:14
- 4הנה ישכל עבדי · Isaiah 52:13
- 5בכל מאדך · Deuteronomy 6:5
- 6כי לא ידח ממנו נדח · II Samuel 14:14
32ואם לא בדור הזה יבא בגלגול בדור אחר ובפרט בדרא דמלכא משיחא שיתעלו כללות נש״י [נשמות ישראל] בבחי׳ מאד
And if not in this generation, he will come in a reincarnation in another generation, and especially in the generation of King Moshiach, when the souls of Israel as a whole (klalus) will be raised to the level of “very” (me’od).
If a soul does not reach its root in this lifetime, it returns in a later generation, in a reincarnation. Above all, in the generation of Moshiach the souls of Israel as a whole will rise to the level of “very.”
כי בימות המשיח עד תחיית המתים1 יהיה העבודה במצות מעשיות רק שיהיה שלימות העבודה וכמ״ש במ״א ע״פ אוסרי לגפן23 לכן אז יהיה גבה מאד בחקותי ממש תלכו.
For in the days of Moshiach, until the Resurrection of the Dead, the service will be in practical mitzvos, only there will be the perfection of the service, as is explained elsewhere on the verse “Binding his foal to the vine.” Therefore then there will be “very high”: truly “in My statutes you will walk.”
In the days of Moshiach, until the Resurrection, divine service will still consist of practical mitzvos, but in their full perfection. In Torah Ohr, Vayechi, on “Binding his foal to the vine,” the Alter Rebbe explains that the days of Moshiach are still a time “to do them,” the perfection of action, before the reward that follows the Resurrection. Then “very high” will be fulfilled, and Israel will truly walk “in My statutes.”
והנה מה שאמר אם בחקותי תלכו אין אם אלא לשון תחנונים4 הכוונה בבקשה זו שלא ילכו כנסת ישראל בבחי׳ הילוך הנ״ל כ״א בג׳ חקיקות הללו
Now, as for its saying “If you walk in My statutes”: “If (im) is nothing but a term of entreaty.” The intent of this request is that the Congregation of Israel should walk in the walking mentioned above only in these three engravings
As the Sages said, “If” here is a plea: G‑d is entreating Israel. The plea is that the Congregation of Israel walk this path only within these three “engravings.”
(שהם שרש ג׳ אבות שהם שרש ג׳ מדות הקדושות אהוי״ר [אהבה ויראה] ורחמנות ושאר המדות מסתעפים מהם נצח ענף החסד שהוא האהבה כו׳ וכן כל המצות נמשכים מג׳ קוין אלו
(which are the root of the three Patriarchs, who are the root of the three holy attributes (middos), love and awe and compassion; and the other attributes branch out from them, Netzach (victory) being a branch of Chesed (kindness), which is love, etc.; and likewise all the mitzvos are drawn from these three lines,
The three engravings are the root of the three Patriarchs and of the three holy attributes, love, awe and compassion. All the other attributes branch out from them, as Netzach branches from Chesed, and all the mitzvos too are drawn from these three lines.
ולכן נחלקו לג׳ בחי׳ תורה ועבודה וגמ״ח [וגמילות חסדים])56 ולא בדרך אחרת זולתם כלל וזהו בחקותי שחקקתי דוקא תלכו:
and therefore they are divided into three categories, Torah, service and acts of kindness), and not in any other way besides them at all. This is [the meaning of] “in My statutes” (bechukosai), that I have engraved (chakakti), specifically, “you shall walk.”
This is why the mitzvos fall into three groups, Torah, service and acts of kindness, the three things on which the world stands. G‑d asks that Israel walk in no other way: “in My statutes,” the ones He engraved.
Every soul will ultimately reach its root, if not now then in another life, and above all in the days of Moshiach. G‑d’s plea, “If you walk,” is that this walking be only through the three “engravings,” the root of the Patriarchs’ attributes and of all the mitzvos.
The Kehot note on the days of Moshiach points to Iggeres HaKodesh 26, which explains that the Sages’ saying “mitzvos will be nullified in the Time to Come” refers to the Resurrection of the Dead, not to the days of Moshiach before it, and to the Talmud’s statement of that saying (Niddah 61b).
Marei mekomos
- 1בימות המשיח עד תחיית המתים יהי׳ העבודה במצות מעשיות · Niddah 61b
- 2ע״פ אוסרי לגפן · תו״א מו, א ובאוה״ת לשם.
- 3אוסרי לגפן · Genesis 49:11
- 4אין אם אלא לשון תחנונים · Avodah Zarah 5a:20
- 5תורה ועבודה וגמ״ח · אבות א, ב.
- 6תורה ועבודה וגמ״ח · Pirkei Avot 1:2
Keeping My commandments ¶33–36
33ה ואת מצותי תשמרו.1 פי׳ השמירה כדי שיתקיים ההילוך דבכל מאדך בתפלה הוא ע״י המצות שהן בחי׳ כלים מכלים שונים לאור א״ס ב״ה וזהו ויין מלכות רב כיד המלך.2
5. “And keep My commandments.” The meaning: the keeping, so that the walking of “with all your might” in prayer will endure, is through the mitzvos, which are the level of vessels, “vessels of diverse vessels,” for the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He. This is [the meaning of] “And royal wine in abundance, according to the hand of the king.”
Section 5 turns to the second half of the verse, “and keep My commandments.” The walking of prayer, “with all your might,” must be kept and preserved, and that happens through the mitzvos, which are vessels for the Infinite Light; the Megillah’s “vessels of diverse vessels… and royal wine in abundance” alludes to this.
פי׳ עד״מ היין שא״א לקבלו בלא כלי וכן עד״מ האור שמאיר בפתילה שאם אין פתילה יסתלק האור.3
The meaning, by way of analogy: wine, which cannot be received without a vessel; and likewise, by way of analogy, the light that shines on a wick: if there is no wick, the light departs.
Wine cannot be held without a vessel, and a flame cannot stay alight without a wick: without the wick, the light departs. In Torah Ohr, Miketz, the Alter Rebbe explains that a flame shines because it takes hold of the wick, and so the light of the G‑dly soul takes hold of the animal soul in which it is clothed.
The mitzvos, the subject of the second half of the verse, are the vessels that preserve the light reached in prayer, as wine needs a cup and a flame needs a wick.
Marei mekomos
- 1ואת מצותי תשמרו · Leviticus 26:3
- 2ויין מלכות רב כיד המלך · Esther 1:7
- 3שאם אין פתילה יסתלק האור · ראה תו״א מ, סע״ב.
34וכן עד״מ בנפש החיונית המחיה אברי הגוף כמו כח הראיה בעין וכח השמיעה באזן שבקלקול הכלי ע״י מכה וכדומה מסתלק אור הראיה מהעין והשמיעה מהאזן עד״מ.
And likewise, by way of analogy, with the vital soul that gives life to the limbs of the body, such as the power of sight in the eye and the power of hearing in the ear: when the vessel is damaged by a blow or the like, the light of sight departs from the eye, and the hearing from the ear, by way of analogy.
The same holds for the vital soul in the body: sight and hearing need healthy organs, and if the eye or the ear is injured, the power departs from it.
וכך עד״ז יובן ענין רמ״ח מ״ע [מצות עשה] רמ״ח אברים דהיינו בחי׳ כלים דז״א לקבל המשכת האור מבחי׳ כתר תר״ך עמודי אור12 שהם תרי״ג מצות דאורייתא ושבע מצות דרבנן
In the same way will be understood the matter of the two hundred and forty-eight positive commandments, the two hundred and forty-eight limbs, that is, the level of the vessels of Z’eir Anpin, to receive the drawing down of the light from the level of Keser (the Crown), the six hundred and twenty pillars of light, which are the six hundred and thirteen mitzvos of the Torah and the seven mitzvos of the Rabbis,
So the 248 positive commandments correspond to 248 “limbs,” the vessels of Z’eir Anpin, which receive the light drawn from Keser, called the “620 pillars of light”: the 613 mitzvos of the Torah and the seven mitzvos of the Rabbis, among them the Chanukah lights and the reading of the Megillah (620 is the numerical value of כתר, Keser).
שיומשך ויתפשט בכלים ואברים דז״א ומשם יומשך בבי״ע ובלעדי הכלים הי׳ [היה] מסתלק האור כענין שנאמר כלים רקים אל תמעיטי3 כו׳ וכתיב אין עוד כלי ויעמוד השמן45 כו׳.
so that it be drawn and spread into the vessels and limbs of Z’eir Anpin, and from there be drawn into Beriah (Creation), Yetzirah (Formation) and Asiyah (Action). Without the vessels the light would depart, as in what is said, “Empty vessels, do not take few,” etc., and it is written, “There is no other vessel; and the oil stopped,” etc.
Through them the light spreads into Z’eir Anpin and then into the lower worlds; without vessels it would depart, as in Elisha’s miracle, where the oil flowed only while there were empty vessels to fill.
(ועמ״ש מזה בביאור ע״פ וקבל היהודים).67 וזהו ויין מלכות הוא האור שמאיר רב כיד המלך הוא בחי׳ היד הגדולה חסד דאריך כו׳
(See what is written about this in the explanation on the verse “And the Jews accepted.”) And this is [the meaning of] “And royal wine”: it is the light that shines; “in abundance, according to the hand of the king”: it is the level of “the great hand,” the Chesed (kindness) of Arich [Anpin], etc.
The reader is referred to the discourse on “And the Jews accepted,” which notes that had there been more vessels, more light would have been drawn down. In the verse, the “royal wine” is the light, and “according to the hand of the king” is “the great hand,” the Chesed of Arich Anpin.
ועל ידי שנכנס יין זה באדם יצא הסוד ואהבה מסותרת ששרשה מבחי׳ האבות אשר שרשן מבחי׳ זו בעבר הנהר כו׳ כנ״ל.
And through this wine entering a person, “the secret comes out,” and [so does] the hidden love, whose root is from the level of the Patriarchs, whose root is from this level beyond the River, etc., as mentioned above.
When this wine enters a person, “the secret comes out,” as the Sages say of wine: the hidden love is revealed, whose root is in the Patriarchs, beyond the River.
אך שצריך להיות בחי׳ כלים מכלים שונים דתורה ומצות שבהן יומשך יין מלכות להיות רב כיד המלך.
Only, there must be the level of vessels, “vessels of diverse vessels,” of Torah and mitzvos, in which the royal wine will be drawn, to be “in abundance, according to the hand of the king.”
But the wine must be received in vessels, the “diverse vessels” of Torah and mitzvos, so that it can flow “in abundance, according to the hand of the king.”
Like the body’s organs for the soul’s powers, the 620 mitzvos are vessels that receive the light of Keser; the “royal wine” of hidden love can flow in abundance only into these vessels.
Marei mekomos
- 1כתר . . תר״ך עמודי אור · פרדס ש״ח, פ״ג. כמ״ש להדיא במאו״א מערכת תר״ך סנ״ו. ועל״ק מטות (פו, ב). ראה (כ, ב). ח׳ דברים הנ״ל (פג, ג). שה״ש (ב, א. ז, ג. כב, ד ונ׳[סמן] מאדמו״ר) [כ].
- 2כתר תר״ך עמודי אור · Pardes Rimmonim 8:5–6
- 3ובלעדי — כלים רקים אל תמעיטי · II Kings 4:3
- 4אין עוד כלי ויעמוד השמן · שם ד, ו.
- 5אין עוד כלי ויעמוד השמן · II Kings 4:6
- 6ועמ״ש מזה בביאור ע״פ וקבל היהודים · תו״א צז, א ואילך. ושם צז, ב ”ואילו היו עוד כלים היה עוד ריבוי המשכת האורות כו׳”.
- 7וקבל היהודים · Esther 9:23
35וזהו ואת מצותי תשמרו פי׳ מצוה לשון צוותא והתחברות והיינו כאשר האור נמשך בכלי אז הוא בבחי׳ התקשרות וצוותא אלינו משא״כ בעודו למעלה נק׳ חקיקה גליף גליפו וכו׳.
This is [the meaning of] “And keep My commandments” (mitzvosai): mitzvah is a term of tzavta, joining and connection. That is, when the light is drawn into a vessel, it is then at the level of a bond and joining with us; whereas while it is still above, it is called engraving, “He engraved engravings,” etc.
“My commandments” (mitzvosai) is read as related to tzavta, joining. When light is drawn into a vessel it becomes bound and joined with us; while it remains above, it is only “engraving.”
וזהו בחוקתי תלכו בתפלה בבחי׳ אהבה ויראה והתעוררות רחמים כו׳ שהם עליות עד בחי׳ חקיקה עליונה אורות דכתר
This is “In My statutes you shall walk”: in prayer, at the level of love and awe (ahavah and yirah) and the arousal of compassion, etc., which are ascents up to the level of the supernal engraving, the lights of Keser (the Crown);
So “In My statutes you shall walk” is the ascent in prayer, through love, awe and the arousal of compassion, up to the supernal engraving, the lights of Keser.
והיינו דוקא ע״י ואת מצותי תשמרו שהן הכלים להמשכת וגילוי אורות הנ״ל שע״י הכלי יתקיים האור והיינו כי צ״ל תמיד בחי׳ העלאה והמשכה כו׳ בחי׳ רצוא ושוב.1
and this is specifically through “And keep My commandments,” which are the vessels for drawing down and revealing the lights mentioned above, for through the vessel the light endures. That is, there must always be the level of raising up and drawing down, etc., the level of “running and returning” (ratzo vashov).
That ascent lasts only through “keep My commandments,” the vessels that draw the lights down and reveal them. There must always be both raising up and drawing down, “running and returning,” as the prophet describes the living creatures of the Chariot.
The verse’s two halves are the two movements of divine service: “walking in My statutes” is the ascent of prayer to the engraved lights of Keser, and “keeping My commandments” draws them down into vessels, running and returning.
Marei mekomos
- 1רצוא ושוב · Ezekiel 1:14
36ועי״ז ונתנה הארץ יבולה1 הארץ היינו בחי׳ מלכות דאצילות שתתן יבולה בהעלאת מ״נ [מיין נוקבין] דרפ״ח ניצוצין ואח״כ ממילא יומשך בחי׳ ועץ השדה יתן פריו הוא המשכת מ״ד [מיין דוכרין]
Through this, “the land shall give its produce”: “the land” is the level of Malchus (sovereignty) of Atzilus (Emanation), which shall give its produce in the raising of the feminine waters (mayin nukvin) of the two hundred and eighty-eight sparks; and afterward there will automatically be drawn the level of “and the tree of the field shall give its fruit,” which is the drawing down of the masculine waters (mayin duchrin);
The verse continues, “the land shall give its produce, and the tree of the field shall give its fruit.” The land is Malchus of Atzilus: its “produce” is the raising of “feminine waters,” the 288 sparks lifted up from below, and in response comes the “fruit” of the tree, the “masculine waters” drawn down from above.
והיינו שיהיה גילוי אור א״ס ב״ה להיות והתהלכתי בתוככם2 בבחי׳ עץ החיים שמשם יומשכו נשמות עליונות הנקראים פרי צדיק עץ חיים3 (ועיין בזח״א [בזהר חלק א] בראשית דל״ז סע״ב [סוף עמוד ב]. עמ״ש במ״א ע״פ בן פורת יוסף4 כו׳)
that is, that there will be a revelation of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, so that “I will walk among you,” at the level of the Tree of Life, from which lofty souls will be drawn, who are called “the fruit of the righteous is a tree of life” (and see the Zohar, Part I, Bereishis, end of folio 37b; see what is written elsewhere on the verse “Yosef is a fruitful bough,” etc.).
That response is a revelation of the Infinite Light, as a later verse promises, “I will walk among you,” from the level of the Tree of Life. From there come lofty souls, called “the fruit of the righteous,” which “is a tree of life.”
ועמ״ש עוד ע״פ את שבתותי תשמרו5 מענין ירידת הנשמות ממקורם ממחשבה עילאה להתלבש בגופים איך שהיא ירידה צורך עלייה למעלה מעלה כו׳.
And see further what is written on the verse “You shall keep My Shabbosos,” regarding the descent of the souls from their source, from higher thought, to be clothed in bodies, how it is a descent for the sake of an ascent, far, far higher, etc.
The reader is referred to the discourse on “You shall keep My Shabbosos” (Likkutei Torah, Behar), which explains that the souls, which even before their descent “arose in thought,” come down into body and animal soul, a descent that calls for great compassion and is for the sake of a far higher ascent.
And see what is written in the discourse beginning “And I will make [your windows of] kadkod,” regarding “purity brings to holiness,” and at the end of the discourse beginning “These are the journeys,” regarding “their journeys according to their goings out.”
Also cited are the discourse on “And I will make your windows of kadkod,” on the teaching that purity leads to holiness, and the end of the discourse on “These are the journeys,” on “their journeys according to their goings out.”
(ועיין מענין חרות על הלוחות1011121314151617181920 ברבות משפטים ר״פ ל״ב. כי תשא פמ״א [פרק מ״א / פרשה מ״א]. פקודי פנ״א. ובגמרא עירובין נ״ד א׳. ובזהר ח״ב [חלק ב׳] דף פ״ד דקי״ג ב׳. קי״ד א׳. קפ״ג א׳ מ״ה ע״ב. ח״א [חלק א׳] דל״ז סע״ב [סוף עמוד ב] ודקל״א ב׳. ח״ג [חלק ג׳] ד״ו ע״ב).21
(And on “engraved upon the Tablets,” see [Midrash] Rabbah on Mishpatim, beginning of section 32; Ki Sisa, section 41; Pekudei, section 51; and in the Gemara, Eruvin 54a; and in the Zohar, Part II, folio 84; folio 113b; 114a; 183a; 45b; Part I, end of folio 37b, and folio 131b; Part III, folio 6b.)
This parenthesis gathers sources on “engraved upon the Tablets” in the Midrash, the Talmud and the Zohar. Several of them read charus, “engraved,” as cherus, “freedom”: freedom from the angel of death and from subjugation.
וצויתי את ברכתי22 ברכת המצות כי מצות צריכות כוונה להמשיך בהן האור וכללות הכוונה היא התפלה של כל יום כמ״ש במ״א ע״פ לא הביט און ביעקב23
“And I will command (vetzivisi) My blessing”: the blessing over the mitzvos. For mitzvos require intention, to draw the light into them, and the intention as a whole (klalus) is the prayer of each day, as is explained elsewhere on the verse “He has not beheld iniquity in Yaakov.”
The verse “And I will command My blessing” (in Parshas Behar) is read as the blessing said over a mitzvah, since vetzivisi, “I will command,” shares its root with mitzvah. Mitzvos need intention, to draw the light into them, and the intention for all of them together is the daily prayer, as explained on the verse “He has not beheld iniquity in Yaakov.”
וזהו ענין אם בחקותי תלכו שהוא בבחינת התפלה ואחר כך ואת מצותי תשמרו כו׳ ודרך פרט זהו ג״כ ענין ברכות המצות:24
This is the matter of “If you walk in My statutes,” which is at the level of prayer, and afterward “and keep My commandments,” etc.; and on the particular level, this is also the matter of the blessings over the mitzvos.
So “If you walk in My statutes” is prayer, and “keep My commandments” follows it. On the particular level, the blessing recited over each mitzvah does the same for that mitzvah; in Likkutei Torah, Masei, the Alter Rebbe describes such a blessing as a drawing down from above that gives the power to raise up the physical thing with which the mitzvah is done.
The verse’s promises are read as the fruit of this service: Malchus raises the sparks as “feminine waters,” and the Infinite Light is drawn down in response. Prayer is the general intention behind all the mitzvos, and the blessing over each mitzvah is its particular intention.
Marei mekomos
- 1ונתנה הארץ יבולה · Leviticus 26:4
- 2והתהלכתי בתוככם · Leviticus 26:12
- 3פרי צדיק עץ חיים · Proverbs 11:30
- 4בן פורת יוסף · Genesis 49:22
- 5ע״פ את שבתותי תשמרו · לעיל מא, א.
- 6ושמתי כדכד · Isaiah 54:12
- 7וסד״ה אלה מסעי · לקו״ת מסעי צב, א.
- 8אלה מסעי · Numbers 33:1
- 9מסעיהם למוצאיהם · Numbers 33:2
- 10חרות על הלוחות · Shemot Rabbah 32:1
- 11חרות על הלוחות · Shemot Rabbah 41:7
- 12חרות על הלוחות · Shemot Rabbah 51:8
- 13חרות על הלוחות · Zohar, Yitro 21:367–378
- 14חרות על הלוחות · Zohar, Mishpatim 3:355–364
- 15חרות על הלוחות · Zohar, Mishpatim 3:364–370
- 16חרות על הלוחות · Zohar, Tetzaveh 7:64–9:73
- 17חרות על הלוחות · Zohar, Beshalach 2:28–3:39
- 18חרות על הלוחות · Zohar, Bereshit 48:470–49:479
- 19חרות על הלוחות · Zohar, Chayei Sara 19:214–21:221
- 20חרות על הלוחות · Zohar, Vayikra 10:80–11:88
- 21(ברבות משפטים . . ח״ג ד״ו ע״ב) · רוב המ״מ נעתקו ונתבארו באוה״ת תשא ע׳ ב׳כא ואילך על הפסוק.
- 22וצויתי את ברכתי · Leviticus 25:21
- 23לא הביט און ביעקב · Numbers 23:21
- 24
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
Each Rosh Chodesh the names of those learning here are brought to the Ohel. Add your name, and mark what you learn so it is counted.
In one’s avodah
Every Jew’s will for G‑d is rooted above knowledge, yet without contemplating G‑d’s greatness it does not come into the open. In prayer a person should walk, rising day by day in love, awe and compassion toward the engraved root of his soul, and by no other way. Then he must hold that light in the vessels of the mitzvos, for without a vessel the light departs: always rising and drawing down again, with each day’s prayer as the intention for all his mitzvos and the blessing as the intention for each one.
Questions for discussion
- Why does the maamar insist that engraved letters are not identical with the stone’s simple substance, and how does this nuance carry over to Keser and to the soul?
- Why do the letters included in the concept fall short as an analogy, and what does the infant who understands but cannot speak show about where the letters come from?
- What does the story of Moshe and Rabbi Akiva show about the difference between the Chochmah of Atzilus and the hidden Chochmah of Keser?
- How does reading “beyond the River” as the root of the soul answer why the blessing says “it is pure” before “You created it”?
- Why must the walking of prayer be followed by keeping the mitzvos, and what do the images of wine, wick and vessel add?
Key terms in this maamar
- The outer dimension (chitzoniyus)חיצוניות
- The external, expressive aspect. ×2
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- Kingship: the level through which G‑d's word creates and rules the worlds. ×5
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×8
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The innermost core of a level.
- Yesod (foundation)יסוד
- The channel that connects and transmits. ×2
- Willרצון
- Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect. ×6
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×1
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence. ×1
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×20
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
- The Sefirosספירות
- The ten divine attributes through which G‑d relates to creation. ×2
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d. ×4
- “He and His vessels” (ihu vegarmohi)איהו וגרמוהי
- From the Tikkunei Zohar: in Atzilus the Light and the vessels are one. Always “vessels”, never “organs”, “causations” or “bones”. Its companion איהו וחיוהי is “He and His life-forces”. Not מגרמיה (“of itself”). ×2
- Tzimtzum (contraction)צמצום
- The self-concealment of the Infinite Light that makes room for finite worlds. ×1
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×13
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving. ×3
- Z'eir Anpin (the emotive attributes)ז״א
- The six emotive Sefiros as one configuration.
- The intellect (mochin)מוחין
- Chochmah, Binah and Daas as a whole. ×2
- Abba and Imma (Chochmah and Binah)אבא ואמא
- The intellectual configurations.
- The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
- The soul that is 'a part of G‑d above'.
- Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
- Measure, limitation and judgment.
- Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
- Harmony of kindness and restraint; associated with compassion.
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×6
- Nukva (the feminine / Malchus)נוקבא
- Malchus as the receiving configuration.
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence.
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of the angels and emotions.
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one.
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×2
- Daas (knowledge)דעת
- Deep connection to an idea, bridging intellect and emotion. ×5
- Self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh)מסירות נפש
- Giving oneself over entirely to G‑d.
- The general and collective expression (klalus)כללות
- That which encompasses the particulars as one: their general and collective expression (the klal, as against the prat). Never “sum”, “sum total”, “totality” or “general principle”, as if the particulars were added up (וכללותן היא מצות הצדקה is “their general and collective expression is the mitzvah of charity”). Render by sense: “their general and collective expression”, “that which encompasses them all”, “X in general”, “X as a whole”. Keep התכללות as “inclusion” / “inter-inclusion”. ×4
- Love and aweאהבה ויראה
- The two 'wings' of divine service. ×1
- Netzach (victory)נצח
- Perseverance, the drive to overcome. ×1