Likkutei Torah · Parshas Tzav · Maamar 7
ששת ימים תאכל מצות וביום השביעי עצרת להוי׳ אלקיך וגו׳
“Six Days You Shall Eat Matzos, and on the Seventh Day an Atzeres”
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
Eating matzah for six days draws a light from above the order of the worlds into the six emotive attributes, and this brings the Atzeres of the seventh day, when Malchus, the hidden “sea,” became revealed “dry land” at the Splitting of the Sea. Matzah has two levels, the lower awe of before midnight and the higher awe revealed after midnight; since the giving of the Torah, the matzah we eat before midnight carries both.
The maamar in brief
The maamar asks why the Torah ties six days of matzah to the Atzeres of the seventh day, the day the sea split, and why the Haggadah explains our matzah, eaten before midnight, by a revelation that came after midnight. The answer begins with spelling. מצת without a vav is the matzah of before midnight: lower awe and childlike faith, which must be guarded from chametz, self-exaltation. מצות with a vav is the matzah of after midnight, drawn from the revelation of the King of the kings of kings: higher awe, on which the external forces have no hold. Bread gives life because it is rooted in Tohu, above man’s root in Tikkun; matzah, bread from the supernal earth, gives the G‑dly soul a knowing of G‑d as faith, like a child who calls “Father” after tasting grain. Since Sinai, the Torah and mitzvos let our matzah carry both levels, hinted in the doubled hei. Six days of matzah draw the encompassing light into the six attributes, and on the seventh, Malchus, the concealed “sea,” became dry land. Israel was still a youth, so it was not yet “for you”: “an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d,” without the complete Hallel.
Outline
- Six days or sevenThe opening verse links six days of matzah to the Atzeres of the seventh day, the day of the Splitting of the Sea; yet at the Pesach of Egypt chametz was forbidden only one day, and they reached the Sea without six days of matzah.¶1–3
- Two spellings, two matzosWhy does Exodus 12:39 explain the matzah by their haste, and the Haggadah by a revelation after midnight? מצת without a vav is the matzah of before midnight; מצות with a vav, the drawing-down of the King of the kings of kings, is the matzah of after midnight, and our matzah shares in it.¶4–7
- Not by bread aloneFood gives life through the word of G‑d within it; the inanimate, vegetative and animal are rooted in Tohu, above man’s root in Tikkun, so once refined they strengthen even his intellect, his Shema and his prayer.¶8–13
- Matzah, the food of faithAs a child knows nothing until he tastes bread, Israel knew G‑d only after eating matzah; chametz is self-exaltation and matzah lowliness; the matzah of before midnight is lower awe and faith, like the child’s call of “Father,” a bond below understanding whose root is above it.¶14–22
- Guarded and unguarded matzahThe first matzah, in smallness, must be guarded and is a “strife” against the evil inclination; the second comes from the King of the kings of kings, the Malchus of the Infinite, as mora gadol, higher awe, so the dough could not leaven and needs no guarding.¶23–27
- Our matzah before midnightIn Egypt, without Torah and mitzvos, only the lower matzah came before midnight; now the Torah and mitzvos of the whole year, the 620 pillars of light of Keser, bring the higher matzah into the one we eat before midnight, as the doubled hei of matzah hints.¶28–33
- Sea and dry landMalchus of Atzilus is the “sea,” the concealed world, and the “earth,” the revealed world; on the seventh night of Pesach a light from the Primordial One, the “east wind,” made the concealed itself revealed, the higher unity of “One” within the lower unity of “forever.”¶34–36
- An Atzeres to Havayah your G‑dThe seventh day is Malchus; six days of matzah, an arousal from below, draw the encompassing light into the six attributes, and the seventh day becomes an Atzeres to both Havayah and Elokim; the Omer count and the Pesach of Egypt are reconciled, and the question of Hallel is raised.¶37–38
- Hallel, and “for you”Israel at the Exodus was a youth, before the Torah, and received the great love only as a small child; so the seventh day of Pesach has no complete Hallel and is not “for you,” while Sukkos, after the Torah, has complete Hallel and Shemini Atzeres is “for you.”¶39–40
Key concepts
- Matzah lacking a vav and full with a vavמצת חסר וי״ו / מצות מלא וי״ו
- The two spellings of the Torah: the matzah of before midnight, lower awe that must be guarded, and the matzah of after midnight, the vav of drawing-down from the King of the kings of kings.
- The food of faithמיכלא דמהימנותא
- The Zohar’s name for matzah: it draws into the soul a knowing of G‑d that is faith, a bond below understanding whose root is above it, like the child who calls “Father.”
- Lower awe and higher aweיראה תתאה / יראה עילאה
- Lower awe (yirah, a feminine word) comes from Malchus of each world and is the preparation and vessel; higher awe (mora gadol, a masculine word) is true bittul from the revelation from above.
- Tohu and Tikkunתהו ותיקון
- Tohu, whose attributes shattered for lack of inter-inclusion, is the root of food and of the animal soul; Tikkun, rooted in Chochmah, is the root of man. Fallen below him, Tohu is higher in its root.
- The King of the kings of kingsמלך מלכי המלכים
- “The kings of kings” are Malchus in each of the four worlds; “the King of the kings of kings” is the Malchus of the Infinite, far above them, whose revelation redeemed Israel.
- Concealed world and revealed worldעלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא
- Malchus of Atzilus as it conceals the light (“sea”) and as it gives existence to the lower worlds (“earth,” “dry land”); at the Sea the concealed itself became revealed.
- The east wind, the Primordial Oneרוח קדים / קדמונו של עולם
- The kadim wind that split the sea is a drawing-down from the Primordial One of the world, the Infinite One Himself, Who is beyond the category of worlds.
- Atzeresעצרת
- The name of the seventh day of Pesach, of Shemini Atzeres and of Shavuos: “to Havayah your G‑d” before the Torah, “for you” once the light is revealed in Israel.
Six days or seven ¶1–3
1ששת ימים1 תאכל מצות2 וביום השביעי עצרת להוי׳ אלקיך וגו׳. וצ״ל אומרו ית׳ ששת ימים תאכל מצות והלא לעיל מיני׳ אמר שבעת ימים תאכל3 עליו מצות.
“Six days you shall eat matzos, and on the seventh day [shall be] an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d,” etc. Now, we must understand why He, may He be blessed, says, “Six days you shall eat matzos,” when just before it He said, “Seven days you shall eat matzos with it.”
The maamar opens with Deuteronomy 16:8, which calls the seventh day of Pesach “an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d” after six days of eating matzah. Atzeres is the Torah’s name for a closing festival day, a day of assembly, from a root meaning to hold back or to conclude. The difficulty is that a few verses earlier (16:3) the Torah already commanded eating matzah for seven days, so why does this verse speak of six?
אך הענין דכאן אין הכוונה להזהיר על אזהרת אכילת מצה אלא על שביום הז׳ עצרת כו׳.
But the point is that here the intent is not to give the warning about eating matzah, but rather [to tell] that on the seventh day there is an Atzeres, etc.
The first answer: this verse is not repeating the command to eat matzah. Its subject is the seventh day, which is an Atzeres.
אך מה שהקדים ששת ימים תאכל מצות משמעות הכתוב הוא דעי״ז שששת ימים תאכל מצות עי״ז יהיה אח״כ וביום השביעי עצרת כו׳.
But as for its first saying “Six days you shall eat matzos,” the implication of the verse is that through this, that “six days you shall eat matzos,” through this there will afterwards be “and on the seventh day an Atzeres,” etc.
Still, the verse mentions the six days of matzah first, and the Alter Rebbe reads this as cause and effect: eating matzah for six days is what brings about the Atzeres of the seventh day. The rest of the maamar explains how this works.
The paragraph presents the opening verse, asks why it speaks of six days of matzah when the Torah commands seven, and reads it as teaching that the six days of matzah bring about the Atzeres of the seventh day.
According to the Kehot note, this maamar was printed, with variations and with an explanation, in Sefer HaMaamarim 5570; for the maamar as a whole the note also points to the discourse with the same opening words in the Siddur and to two discussions in the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah.
Marei mekomos
- 1ששת ימים · נדפס בשינויים בסה״מ תק״ע עם ביאור. ולכללות המאמר ראה ג״כ ד״ה זה בסידור רפד, א. אוה״ת ויקרא-ב ע׳ תמז ואילך. אוה״ת ראה ע׳ תשלה ואילך.
- 2ששת ימים תאכל מצות · Deuteronomy 16:8
- 3שבעת ימים תאכל מצות · Deuteronomy 16:3
2ולהבין מהו ענין השייכות דאכילת מצה ששת ימים להיות עי״ז וביום השביעי עצרת1, ועוד דהנה ענין וביום השביעי עצרת להוי׳ אלקיך היינו לפי שבשביעי של פסח היה הנס דקי״ס [דקריעת ים סוף].
Now, we need to understand what the connection is between eating matzah for six days and there being, through this, “and on the seventh day an Atzeres.” Furthermore, [the meaning of] “and on the seventh day an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d” is because on the seventh [day] of Pesach there was the miracle of the Splitting of the Sea of Reeds.
Two questions follow. What links six days of eating matzah with the Atzeres of the seventh day? And since the seventh day of Pesach is an Atzeres because the Sea of Reeds split on that day, what does eating matzah have to do with the Splitting of the Sea?
The paragraph sharpens the question: the seventh day’s Atzeres celebrates the Splitting of the Sea, so how can eating matzah be what brings it about?
Marei mekomos
- 1
3והנה פסח מצרים היה חימוצו נוהג רק יום אחד1 וא״כ הרי זכו לקי״ס [לקריעת ים סוף] שלא ע״י אכילת מצה כל ששת הימים, ומדוע לדורות נאמר שבעת ימים2 תאכל עליו מצות
Now, [at] the Pesach of Egypt, its [prohibition of] chametz applied only one day; if so, they merited the Splitting of the Sea of Reeds not through eating matzah all six days. Why, then, is it said for the generations [to come], “Seven days you shall eat matzos with it,”
At the first Pesach in Egypt, the prohibition of chametz applied for only one day, yet the Jews still merited the Splitting of the Sea on the seventh day without six days of matzah. Why, then, are all later generations commanded to eat matzah for seven days?
וגם דדוקא ע״י שששת ימים תאכל מצות עי״ז הוא שיוכלו לבוא להיות וביום השביעי עצרת כו׳.
and also, [why is it] specifically through “six days you shall eat matzos” that they will be able to come to “and on the seventh day an Atzeres,” etc.?
And why should the six days of matzah be the condition for reaching the Atzeres of the seventh day, when the first generation reached it without them?
The paragraph raises a further difficulty: at the Exodus, the Splitting of the Sea came without six days of matzah, so why does the verse present the six days as what leads to it?
Marei mekomos
- 1פסח מצרים היה חימוצו נוהג רק יום אחד · Pesachim 96b:1–2
- 2
Two spellings, two matzos ¶4–7
We also need to understand why, of the seventh [day] of Pesach, it is said, “an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d,” while of Shemini Atzeres it is said, “an Atzeres shall be for you.”
A further question: the seventh day of Pesach is called “an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d,” while Shemini Atzeres, after Sukkos, is called “an Atzeres shall be for you” (Numbers 29:35). Why is the one described as G‑d’s and the other as “yours”?
גם להבין מ״ש ויאפו את הבצק2 אשר הוציאו ממצרים עוגות מצות כי לא חמץ כי גורשו ממצרים ולא יכלו להתמהמה כו׳,
We also need to understand what is written, “And they baked the dough that they had brought out of Egypt into cakes of matzos, for it had not leavened, because they were driven out of Egypt and could not tarry,” etc.,
Another question concerns Exodus 12:39, which tells how the Jews leaving Egypt baked the dough they had taken with them into cakes of matzah, because they were driven out in haste.
דמשמע שזהו נתינת טעם למה שאפו מצות ולא חמץ לפי שגורשו ממצרים ולא הספיק להחמיץ.3
which implies that this gives the reason why they baked matzos and not chametz: because they were driven out of Egypt and [the dough] did not have time to leaven.
Read simply, the verse gives the reason their bread was matzah and not chametz: they were rushed out, and the dough had no time to rise.
The paragraph adds two questions: why the seventh day of Pesach is an Atzeres “to G‑d” while Shemini Atzeres is “for you,” and why the Torah explains the matzah of the Exodus by the haste of leaving Egypt.
Marei mekomos
- 1עצרת להוי׳ אלקיך · Deuteronomy 16:8
- 2ויאפו את הבצק · Exodus 12:39
- 3עצרת תהי׳ לכם · Numbers 29:35
5וזה תמוה דהרי נאסר להם אכילת חמץ יום האחד עכ״פ [על כל פנים] כדאיתא בפסחים דף צ״ו ע״ב. וא״כ איך היו יכולים לאפות חמץ עד שצריך נתינת טעם כי גורשו כו׳.
But this is puzzling, for eating chametz was forbidden to them at least on the one day, as is stated in Pesachim, folio 96b. If so, how could they have baked chametz, so that a reason would be needed, “because they were driven out,” etc.?
But that reason seems unnecessary: chametz was already forbidden to them on that day, as the Talmud states (Pesachim 96b), so they could not have baked chametz in any case. Why would the Torah need to explain that they were rushed?
גם להבין מ״ש בהגדה מצה זו שאנו אוכלים על שום מה על שום שלא הספיק בצקת של אבותינו להחמיץ עד שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים הקב״ה וגאלם.12
We also need to understand what is said in the Haggadah: “This matzah that we eat, for what reason? Because the dough of our fathers did not have time to leaven before there was revealed to them the King of the kings of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, and He redeemed them.”
The same question applies to the Haggadah, which explains the matzah we eat at the Seder by the dough of our ancestors not having time to rise before the King of the kings of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, was revealed to them and redeemed them.
The paragraph shows that both the verse and the Haggadah seem to give an unnecessary reason for the matzah of the Exodus, since chametz was forbidden to them anyway.
Marei mekomos
- 1מצה זו שאנו אוכלים על שום מה על שום שלא הספיק בצקת של אבותינו להחמיץ עד שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים הקב״ה וגאלם · Pesach Haggadah, Magid, Rabban Gamliel's Three Things 4
- 2
6והרי בלאה״נ [בלאו הכי נמי] כבר נצטוו על מצות ומרורים יאכלוהו,1 ועוד דזה שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים היה אחר חצות לילה.
For in any case they had already been commanded, “With matzos and bitter herbs they shall eat it.” Moreover, the revelation to them of the King of the kings of kings was after midnight.
Moreover, quite apart from the haste of leaving, they had already been commanded to eat the Pesach offering with matzah and bitter herbs. And the revelation of the King of the kings of kings, at the plague of the firstborn, came only after midnight.
And the command, “With matzos and bitter herbs they shall eat it,” is before midnight, for the Pesach [offering] is eaten only until midnight;
That command was fulfilled before midnight, since the Pesach offering may be eaten only until midnight, as the Mishnah rules (Zevachim 5:8), and the Rambam codifies at the end of chapter 8 of the laws of the Pesach offering.
וכן מצה זו שאנו אוכלים הוא ג״כ קודם חצות דוקא וא״כ איך הוא על שום כו׳ שנגלה כו׳.
and likewise this matzah that we eat is also specifically before midnight. If so, how is it “because,” etc., “there was revealed,” etc.?
Our Seder matzah, too, must be eaten before midnight. So how can the Haggadah explain it by an event that happened only after midnight?
והענין הוא דהנה גבי בערב תאכלו מצת5 כתיב מצת חסר וי״ו וגבי ויאפו כו׳ עוגות מצות6 כתיב מצות מלא בוי״ו.
The explanation is this. Regarding “In the evening you shall eat matzos,” [the word] matzos is written מצת, lacking a vav; but regarding “And they baked,” etc., “cakes of matzos,” matzos is written מצות, full, with a vav.
The answer begins from the spelling of the Torah. In Exodus 12:18, “In the evening you shall eat matzos,” the word is written מצת, without a vav; in Exodus 12:39, “cakes of matzos,” it is written מצות, with a vav.
והיינו כי הוי״ו זהו ההמשכה שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים (ועיין בזהר ויצא דקנ״ז7 א׳ וברע״מ [וברעיא מהימנא] פ׳ פנחס דרנ״א ב׳).
That is because the vav is the drawing-down, [namely] that there was revealed to them the King of the kings of kings (and see the Zohar, Vayetze, folio 157a, and the Raaya Mehemna, Parshas Pinchas, folio 251b).
The vav, a straight line drawn downward, stands for a drawing-down from above; here it is the revelation of the King of the kings of kings. In the Zohar passages cited (Vayetze, and the Raaya Mehemna, “the Faithful Shepherd,” a part of the Zohar, on Pinchas), matzah joined with the vav becomes מצוה, a mitzvah, and the matzah is “guarded for her husband, who is the vav.” In Torah Ohr, Toldos, the Alter Rebbe reads the vav the same way: the vav of “and the G‑d of (ve-Elokei) our fathers” is the drawing-down through which “our fathers,” Chochmah and Binah, come into being.
וא״כ היה ב׳ בחי׳ מצה. הא׳ מ״ש בערב תאכלו מצת שהיא מצה דקודם חצות והיא מצת חסר וי״ו.
If so, there were two levels of matzah. The first is what is written, “In the evening you shall eat matzos,” which is the matzah of before midnight, and it is מצת, lacking a vav.
So there were two kinds of matzah. The first is the matzah of before midnight, commanded in Exodus 12:18 and spelled without a vav.
And the second is what is written, “And they baked,” etc., “matzos,” etc., which is the matzah of after midnight, and it is full, with a vav, that is, after there was revealed to them, etc.
The second is the matzah of after midnight, baked as they left Egypt (Exodus 12:39) and spelled with a vav, because it came after the King of the kings of kings was revealed to them.
After pressing the question of timing, the paragraph begins the answer: the Torah’s two spellings of matzos point to two levels of matzah, one before midnight and one after the revelation at midnight.
The Kehot note cites the Rebbe’s annotation that the vav as a drawing-down is explained in Torah Ohr, “Ve’eileh Toldos,” and in the discourse “HaKol Kol Yaakov” that serves as the introduction to the Siddur. In the Torah Ohr passage, the vav of “and the G‑d of [our fathers]” is the drawing-down through which “our fathers,” Chochmah and Binah, come into being.
Marei mekomos
- 1כבר נצטוו על מצות ומרורים יאכלוהו · ראה אוה״ת בא ע׳ שז.
- 2שהפסח אינו נאכל אלא עד חצות · זבחים פ״ה מ״ח. רמב״ם הל׳ ק״פ ספ״ח.
- 3שהפסח אינו נאכל אלא עד חצות · Mishnah Zevachim 5:8
- 4שהפסח אינו נאכל אלא עד חצות · Mishneh Torah, Paschal Offering 8:15
- 5
- 6ויאפו כו׳ עוגות מצות · Exodus 12:39
- 7ועיין בזהר ויצא דקנ״ז א׳ · Zohar, Vayetzei 23:200–225
- 8הוי״ו זהו המשכה · ”ראה תו״א ד״ה ואלה תולדות. ד״ה הקל קול יעקב (הקדמה לסידור)”. — הערת כ״ק אדמו״ר בסה״מ תש״ד ע׳ 171.
- 9
- 10
7וע״כ אמר בהגדה מצה זו שאנו אוכלים על שום מה על שום שלא הספיק בצקת של אבותינו להחמיץ עד שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים1 כו׳ שהוא ענין מצות מלא בוי״ו שהיה אחר חצות דוקא.
Therefore it says in the Haggadah, “This matzah that we eat, for what reason? Because the dough of our fathers did not have time to leaven before there was revealed to them the King of the kings of kings,” etc., which is the matter of מצות, full with a vav, which was specifically after midnight.
This is why the Haggadah explains our matzah by the moment after midnight when the King of the kings of kings was revealed: it refers to the second matzah, מצות with a vav.
דהמצה זו שאנו אוכלים הוא ג״כ מבחי׳ זו והיינו מדכתיב ששת ימים תאכל מצות2 בוי״ו, שמזה מוכח דמצה זו שאנו אוכלים היא ג״כ מבחי׳ ומדרגה זו. ולכן עי״ז יומשך להיות וביום השביעי עצרת כו׳:
For this matzah that we eat is also of this level, as [is seen] from its being written, “Six days you shall eat matzos,” with a vav, which proves that this matzah that we eat is also of this level and rung. And therefore, through this, there will be drawn down “and on the seventh day an Atzeres,” etc.
Our matzah, though eaten before midnight, also belongs to that higher level, as the verse about the six days shows by spelling מצות with a vav. And this is why the six days of matzah lead to the Atzeres of the seventh day.
The paragraph applies the two levels to the Haggadah: the matzah we eat shares in the higher, after-midnight level, and that is what draws down the Atzeres of the seventh day.
Marei mekomos
- 1מצה זו שאנו אוכלים על שום מה על שום שלא הספיק בצקת של אבותינו להחמיץ עד שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים · Pesach Haggadah, Magid, Rabban Gamliel's Three Things 4
- 2
Not by bread alone ¶8–13
2. To understand all this, we must first introduce [the meaning of] what is written, “For not by bread alone does man live,” etc., for this resolves the question:
The second section begins the explanation with Deuteronomy 8:3, “For not by bread alone does man live, but by all that comes forth from the mouth of Havayah does man live.” This verse answers a basic question about food.
איך יש בכח המאכל להחיות את האדם הלא הלחם הוא בחי׳ צומח והאדם הוא בחי׳ מדבר וא״כ איך יהיה הצומח בחי׳ מחיה להמדבר שלמעלה ממנו הרבה.
How does food have the power to give life to a person? Is not bread of the level of the vegetative, and man of the level of the speaking? If so, how can the vegetative be that which gives life to the speaking, which is far above it?
Creation is ranked in four orders: the inanimate, the vegetative (plants), the animal, and the “speaking,” the human being. Bread comes from grain, a plant, so how can something of a lower order give life to a person, who is far above it?
אלא כי לא על הלחם לבדו מצד עצמות הלחם יחיה האדם, אלא על כל מוצא פי הוי׳ שמלובש ממש בהלחם, דהיינו ממאמר תדשא הארץ דשא,2
But [the answer is]: “Not by bread alone,” by virtue of the bread’s own essence, “does man live,” but rather “by all that comes forth from the mouth of Havayah,” which is actually clothed in the bread, namely, from the utterance “Let the earth sprout vegetation.”
The answer: what gives life is not the bread itself but G‑d’s creative word clothed in it, the utterance “Let the earth sprout vegetation” (Genesis 1:11) by which plants were created.
וכמ״ש בלק״ת [בלקוטי תורה (להאריז״ל)] פ׳ עקב כי אותו דבר ה׳ נכנס באותו המזון והוא זן ומחיה את האדם. אך צ״ל דהלא גם באדם מלובש דבר ה׳ ממאמר נעשה אדם.3
And as is written in the Arizal’s Likkutei Torah, Parshas Eikev, that very word of G‑d enters into that food, and it nourishes and gives life to the person. But we need to understand: is not the word of G‑d clothed in man as well, from the utterance “Let us make man”?
The Alter Rebbe cites the Likkutei Torah of the Arizal (his teachings on the Torah as recorded by his disciple Rabbi Chaim Vital, not this book of the same name), on Parshas Eikev: that very word of G‑d enters the food and nourishes the person. But this raises a new question: the human being too was created by a divine utterance, “Let us make man” (Genesis 1:26), so why should he need the word in the bread?
The paragraph introduces the principle that food sustains a person through the divine word within it, and then asks why a human being, who has a divine word of his own, needs the word in the food.
The Kehot note adds that the Arizal says this on Deuteronomy 8:3 and at the beginning of Sefer HaLikkutim, and that the Rebbe’s maamar “Bereishis Bara” of 5720 explains at length, from the Baal Shem Tov, that man is nourished by the inanimate, vegetative and animal for the sake of the word of G‑d within them.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי לא על הלחם לבדו · Deuteronomy 8:3
- 2תדשא הארץ דשא · Genesis 1:11
- 3נעשה אדם . . תדשא הארץ דשא · Genesis 1:26
9וא״כ למה יקבל חיות מהלחם שמלובש בו ממאמר תדשא כו׳. אך הענין הוא ע״פ המבואר בכמה מקומות [ועמ״ש בפ׳ בשלח1 בד״ה להבין ענין לחם משנה]
If so, why should he receive life-force from the bread, in which [the word] from the utterance “Let [the earth] sprout,” etc., is clothed? But the explanation is according to what is explained in several places [and see what is written in Parshas Beshalach, in the discourse beginning “To understand the matter of lechem mishneh (the double bread)”]:
If the human being has a divine utterance of his own, why should he receive life from the utterance in the bread? The answer rests on a principle explained elsewhere, and the text points to the discourse on lechem mishneh, the double loaves of Shabbos, in Torah Ohr, Parshas Beshalach.
דבחי׳ דצ״ח [דומם צומח חי] שרשן הוא מבחי׳ עולם התהו שקדם לבחי׳ עולם התיקון כו׳ אלא שנשתלשלו בריבוי המדרגות וע״י שבה״כ [שבירת הכלים] עד שירדו למטה מטה ונתהוה מהם דברים גשמיים.23
that the root of the inanimate, the vegetative and the animal is from the level of the World of Tohu (Chaos), which preceded the level of the World of Tikkun (Rectification), etc.; only they descended through many levels and through the shattering of the vessels (sheviras hakeilim), until they came down very low and physical things came into being from them.
The principle: the inanimate, vegetative and animal have their root in the World of Tohu (Chaos), which came before the World of Tikkun (Rectification). Through the shattering of the vessels and a long chain of descent they fell lower and lower, until physical things came into being from them. In Likkutei Torah, Sh’lach, the Alter Rebbe answers the same question in these terms: the “word of G‑d” in food is the 288 sparks that fell in the shattering of the vessels, whose root is very high, while man is from Tikkun.
The paragraph begins the answer: what a person eats is rooted in the World of Tohu, which preceded Tikkun, even though it has fallen to the lowest level.
As the Torah Ohr discourse on lechem mishneh explains, Tohu consists of “points one beneath another without inter-inclusion,” each attribute a separate entity unable to bear its opposite, and so they shattered; from them, through many stages of cause and effect, the physical inanimate, vegetative and animal came into being.
Marei mekomos
- 1בפ׳ בשלח · תו״א סה, ד. וראה שם עד, א.
- 2נעשה אדם . . תדשא הארץ דשא · Genesis 1:26
- 3בלקו״ת פ׳ עקב · להאריז״ל ע״פ ח, ג. וראה גם ספר הליקוטים להאריז״ל בתחלתו. פע״ח שכ״ז פ״א. ראה גם תו״ח סה, ד. עד, א. לקו״ת פ׳ מסעי צו, א. וראה אוה״ת שלח כרך-ו ע׳ א׳תשע, ובד״ה ושבתי בשלום — תשל״ח הערה 86 (סה״מ מלוקט ח״ב ע׳ קסד). ומבואר בארוכה מהבעש״ט שזה שהאדם ניזון מדצ״ח הוא בשביל המוצא פי הוי׳ שבהם — ד״ה בראשית ברא-תש״כ.
10והאדם שרשו מעולם התיקון ועיקר בחי׳ עולם התיקון הוא בחי׳ חכמה דאצי׳. ונקרא המשכת מוחין כי בחכמה אתברירו12 והאדם שיש בו נפש השכלית שרש השתלשלותה הוא ג״כ מבחי׳ חכמה.
And man’s root is from the World of Tikkun, and the principal [element] of the World of Tikkun is the level of Chochmah (wisdom) of Atzilus. And it is called “the drawing-down of the intellect (mochin),” for “through Chochmah they were refined.” And man, in whom there is an intellectual soul, the root of its descent is also from the level of Chochmah.
The human being, by contrast, is rooted in the World of Tikkun, whose main element is Chochmah (wisdom) of Atzilus. Tikkun is the drawing-down of mochin, intellect, since, as the Zohar puts it, “through Chochmah they were refined”; and the human intellectual soul likewise descends from Chochmah.
ושבה״כ [ושבירת הכלים] שהיה בעולם התהו הוא בבחי׳ ז׳ מדות, אמנם הם בחי׳ המדות שלמעלה מהחכמה דאצי׳ ונק׳ בהמה רבה [וע׳ בע״ח [בעץ חיים] ש״ח שהדעת דתהו נפל בשבה״כ [בשבירת הכלים]3 וגם שבז״ת [שבז׳ תחתונות] הי׳ [היה] כלול ג״כ כח המוחין שבמדות כו׳
And the shattering of the vessels that took place in the World of Tohu was in the level of the seven emotive attributes (middos); but they are the level of the middos that are above the Chochmah of Atzilus, and they are called “the great beast” (behemah rabbah) [and see Etz Chaim, Shaar 8, that the Daas (knowledge) of Tohu fell in the shattering of the vessels, and also that in the seven lower [Sefiros] there was included as well the power of the mochin that is within the middos, etc.
The shattering in Tohu took place in its seven emotive attributes, but those attributes stood above the Chochmah of Atzilus, and they are called behemah rabbah, “the great beast.” In a bracketed note the Alter Rebbe adds from Etz Chaim that the Daas of Tohu fell in the shattering, and that the power of the intellect within the attributes was included in them.
ולכן הנה״ב [הנפש הבהמית] שבאדם שנלקחה מק״נ [מקליפת נוגה] משבה״כ [משבירת הכלים] היא ג״כ משכלת ומשגת כו׳ ועמ״ש בפ׳ מקץ בד״ה המגביהי לשבת4 כו׳].
And therefore the animal soul in man, which is taken from kelipas nogah, from the shattering of the vessels, also reasons and comprehends, etc. And see what is written in Parshas Miketz, in the discourse beginning “Who is enthroned on high,” etc.]
That is why the animal soul, which comes from kelipas nogah, the mixed realm formed from the shattered vessels, can also think and understand: the intellect of Tohu is included in its root. The text refers to the Torah Ohr discourse “Who is enthroned on high” in Parshas Miketz on this point.
The paragraph contrasts man’s root in Tikkun and Chochmah with the root of food in the attributes of Tohu, which stand above the Chochmah of Atzilus, and notes that this is why even the animal soul has intellect.
The Kehot note traces “through Chochmah they were refined” to the Zohar as quoted in Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 28, where it is paired with “darkness is turned into light.” Likkutei Torah, Vayikra explains it with the analogy of rennet, which separates the cheese from the whey though its own taste is felt in neither.
Marei mekomos
- 1בחכמה אתברירו · Leviticus 4:1
- 2כי בחכמה אתברירו · Zohar, Pekudei 51:663–674
- 3וע׳ בע״ח ש״ח שהדעת דתהו נפל בשבה״כ · Sefer Etz Chaim 8
- 4המגביהי לשבת · Psalms 113:5
11ולפי שלא היה בהם בחי׳ ההתכללות נשברו ונפלו ונמצא הן למטה מהאדם ולכן צריכים להתברר ע״י האדם דוקא כי בחכמה אתברירו כנ״ל.
And because there was no [quality of] inter-inclusion in them, they shattered and fell, and so they are [now] below man; therefore they need to be refined specifically through man, for “through Chochmah they were refined,” as mentioned above.
The Sefiros of Tohu lacked inter-inclusion: each attribute stood alone without blending with the others, so they shattered and fell, and their sparks now lie below man, in physical things. They can be refined only through man, because refinement comes through Chochmah, and man is rooted in Chochmah.
אך לאחר שמתבררים הם מחי׳ את האדם מצד שרשן שהוא למעלה מהאדם, וזהו כי על כל מוצא פי1 ה׳ יחיה האדם
But once they are refined, they give life to man by virtue of their root, which is above man. And this is [the meaning of] “but by all that comes forth from the mouth of Havayah does man live.”
Once refined, these sparks give life to man by virtue of their root, which is higher than his. This is the deeper meaning of the end of Deuteronomy 8:3, “by all that comes forth from the mouth of Havayah does man live.”
דהנה פי׳ מוצא פי ה׳ הוא המקור ושרש שמשם נמשכו להיות גילוי המאמרות מפי ה׳ ובבחי׳ מקורן ושרשן הרי הלחם נלקח מבחי׳ עליונה יותר כנ״ל.
For the meaning of “that which comes forth from the mouth of Havayah” is the source and root from which the utterances were drawn forth, to be revealed from the mouth of Havayah; and at the level of their source and root, the bread is taken from a higher level, as mentioned above.
In Likkutei Torah, Matos (the discourse the text cites in the next paragraph), the Alter Rebbe explains that motza (מוצא) has two senses: “that which comes forth,” the utterance itself, and “the source,” as in motza mayim, a spring of water. Here it is the source, the place from which the utterances come forth; and at the level of that source, the root of the bread is higher than the root of man.
The paragraph resolves the question: the sparks of Tohu in food are below man in their present state but above him in their root, so man must refine them, and once refined they give him life from that higher root.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי על כל מוצא פי ה׳ יחיה האדם · Deuteronomy 8:3
12וזהו הטעם שהמאמר נעשה אדם1 הוא האחרון בעשרה מאמרות שהמאמרו׳ [שהמאמרות] תדשא2 ותוצא הארץ3 כו׳ כולם הם קודמים למאמר נעשה אדם והיינו מטעם הנ״ל להיות ששרשן בעולם התהו שקדם לעולם התיקון ששם שרש האדם.
And this is the reason that the utterance “Let us make man” is the last of the Ten Utterances, while the utterances “Let [the earth] sprout” and “Let the earth bring forth,” etc., all precede the utterance “Let us make man”: it is for the reason mentioned above, since their root is in the World of Tohu, which preceded the World of Tikkun, where the root of man is.
This explains the order of Creation in Genesis 1: the utterances that brought forth plants and animals, “Let the earth sprout” and “Let the earth bring forth,” all come before “Let us make man,” the last of the ten utterances. What came first is rooted in Tohu, which preceded Tikkun, the root of man.
ולכן אמר רב נחמן והאי דלא אמרית לך באורתא דלא אכלי4 בישרא דתורא (בב״ק [בבבא קמא] דע״ב), שנמצא מובן מזה שהמאכל מוסיף חיות ג״כ בכח החכמה והשכל של האדם.
And therefore Rav Nachman said, “And the reason I did not tell you [this] in the evening is that I had not eaten beef” (in Bava Kamma, folio 72). From this it is understood that food adds life-force also to the power of a person’s wisdom and intellect.
The Talmud (Bava Kamma 71b–72a) tells that Rav Nachman, asked a question in the evening, answered it only the next morning, explaining that the evening before he had not eaten beef. This shows that food strengthens even a person’s intellect, not only his body.
וכן ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שאין התינוק יודע5 לקרות אבא עד שיטעום טעם דגן והיינו מטעם הנ״ל
And so too our Sages, of blessed memory, said that a child does not know how to call “Father” until he tastes the taste of grain; and that is for the reason mentioned above:
Similarly the Sages say (Berachos 40a) that a child does not know to call “Father” until he has tasted grain. The reason is the one given above.
להיות כי שרש המאכלים הן למעלה בעולם התהו שהוא למעלה מהחכמה דתיקון ע״כ יש בהם הכח והיכולת לחזק ולהוסיף גם כח החכמה של האדם [ועמ״ש ע״פ וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות].678
since the root of foods is above, in the World of Tohu, which is above the Chochmah of Tikkun, therefore they have the power and the ability to strengthen and to add to even a person’s power of Chochmah [and see what is written on the verse “And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes”].
Because food is rooted in Tohu, above the Chochmah of Tikkun, it can strengthen even a person’s Chochmah. The text points to its discourse on “And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes” in Likkutei Torah, Parshas Matos.
The paragraph supports the principle with the order of Creation, Rav Nachman’s remark about eating beef, and the Sages’ saying that a child learns to call “Father” only after tasting grain: food, rooted in Tohu, adds even to the intellect.
The Kehot note points to the previous maamar in this parsha (Likkutei Torah, Tzav 12b), which links this saying about the child to matzah: matzah draws down the mochin of Abba, which are above comprehended knowledge but come down in a state of smallness, like the child’s knowing to call “Father,” and therefore the Zohar calls matzah “the food of faith.”
Marei mekomos
- 1נעשה אדם · Genesis 1:26
- 2תדשא · Genesis 1:11
- 3ותוצא הארץ · Genesis 1:24
- 4
- 5אין התינוק יודע · Berakhot 40a:14
- 6ע״פ וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות · לקו״ת מטות פא, ב ואילך.
- 7וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות · Numbers 30:2
- 8בד״ה המגביהי לשבת · תו״א לח, ב.
13וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] הנה יובן בעבודת ה׳ שזהו ענין בירורי׳ [בירורים / בירורין] דרפ״ח ניצוצין1 דתהו שמלובשים בדברים הגשמיים שמתבררי׳ [שמתבררים] ועולים למעלה בבחי׳ התיקון שרש נפש האלקית,
So too, this will be understood in the service of G‑d: this is the matter of the refinements of the 288 sparks of Tohu that are clothed in physical things, which are refined and rise up into the level of Tikkun, the root of the G‑dly soul;
The same principle applies in the service of G‑d. According to the Arizal, 288 sparks of holiness fell in the shattering of the vessels of Tohu and are clothed in physical things; they are refined and raised into Tikkun, the root of the G‑dly soul.
והיינו ע״י עבודת ה׳ בק״ש [בקריאת שמע] ותפלה שבחי׳ כח וחיות שניתוסף בו ע״י האכילה לש״ש [לשם שמים] הוא נכלל באחד ואהבת ומוסיף כח ההתבוננות והתפעלות האהבה לה׳ להיות ההתבוננות והדעת והאוי״ר [והאהבה ויראה] בתוקף והתקשרות יותר מכח נפש האלהית עצמה,
that is, through the service of G‑d in the Shema and prayer. The strength and life-force added to him through eating for the sake of Heaven are included in “One” and “And you shall love,” and they add to the power of contemplation and to the stirring of love for G‑d, so that the contemplation, the Daas, and the love and awe are with a force and a bond greater than [comes from] the power of the G‑dly soul itself;
This happens in the Shema and in prayer: the strength a person gains from eating for the sake of Heaven enters his contemplation of G‑d’s oneness (“One”) and his love (“And you shall love”). Its force can make his contemplation, his knowing (Daas), his love and his awe stronger and more firmly bound to G‑d than the G‑dly soul could achieve by itself.
דהיינו מטעם הנ״ל להיות שמלובש בהן בחי׳ רפ״ח ניצוצין דתהו שלמעלה מבחי׳ התיקון ע״כ ביכולתם להוסיף עילוי גם לבחי׳ חכמה ומדות שבנפש האלהית
that is, for the reason mentioned above: since there are clothed in them the 288 sparks of Tohu, which are above the level of Tikkun, they are therefore able to add an elevation even to the Chochmah and the middos in the G‑dly soul
The reason is that the sparks of Tohu in the food stand above Tikkun in their root, so they can raise even the Chochmah and the emotive attributes of the G‑dly soul.
(וכנודע מענין והחיות נושאות כו׳ וכמ״ש בפ׳ יתרו ע״פ זכור את יום השבת2 לקדשו3 כו׳) בק״ש [בקריאת שמע]4 ותפלה ועסק התורה ומצות:
(as is known from the matter of “and the chayos carry,” etc., and as is explained in Parshas Yisro on the verse “Remember the Shabbos day to keep it holy,” etc.) in the Shema, in prayer, and in occupation with Torah and mitzvos.
The text compares this to “and the chayos carry,” the holy creatures beneath the divine Throne: in Torah Ohr, Yisro, the Alter Rebbe explains that like a horse that carries its rider to a place he could not reach by himself, the chayos carry the Throne higher, and so the lower power that comes from food lifts the G‑dly soul. The Kehot note adds that the errata table of the first edition records that something is missing here, before “in the Shema.”
The paragraph applies the principle to divine service: eating for the sake of Heaven refines the sparks of Tohu in food, and their power, rooted above Tikkun, strengthens a person’s Shema, prayer, Torah study and mitzvos beyond what his G‑dly soul could reach alone.
In Torah Ohr, Yisro, the chayos are both carried by the Throne and carrying it: carried, because they are nullified to it as a horse is to its rider; carrying, because like a horse they bring the rider to a place he could not reach by himself. In the same way the lower power that comes from food, rooted in Tohu, lifts the G‑dly soul higher than it could go alone.
Marei mekomos
- 1דרפ״ח ניצוצין · ראה סה״מ תקס״ה ע׳ תרמב.
- 2ע״פ זכור את יום השבת · תו״א עא, ב.
- 3זכור את יום השבת לקדשו · Exodus 20:8
- 4השבת — בק״ש · בלוח התיקון להוצאה הא׳ נרשם חסר קצת וכן נדפס בהוצאה הב׳ בשולי העמוד. וראה לעיל פקודי ה, א הערה שו״ה בזהר.
Matzah, the food of faith ¶14–22
14ג וע״פ הקדמה הנ״ל יובן ג״כ בענין מצות אכילת מצה בחג הפסח
3. And according to the above introduction, the matter of the mitzvah of eating matzah on the festival of Pesach will also be understood.
The third section applies the principle about bread to the mitzvah of eating matzah on Pesach.
דמבואר בזהר ויצא קנ״ז ב׳ דכמו שבהשכלת גשמיות אין התינוק יודע ומשכיל כלום עד שטועם לחם וכמבואר הטעם למעלה. כך בצאת ישראל ממצרים לא ידעו1 להשכיל גדולת ה׳ עד שאכלו מצה שהיא בחי׳ לחם היוצא מן הארץ העליונה.
For it is explained in the Zohar, Vayetze, [folio] 157b, that just as in physical understanding a child does not know or understand anything until he tastes bread, as the reason has been explained above, so too, when Israel went out of Egypt, they did not know how to grasp the greatness of G‑d until they ate matzah, which is the level of bread that comes forth from the supernal earth.
The Zohar (Vayetze 157b) says that a child knows and understands nothing until he tastes bread (the reason, as explained above, is that bread is rooted in Tohu, above Chochmah). In the same way, when Israel left Egypt they could not grasp G‑d’s greatness until they ate matzah, bread from the “supernal earth”; the Zohar draws this from the verse “the earth, from which bread comes forth” (Job 28:5).
שעל מוצא פי ה׳ הנמשך בלחם זה יחיה האדם והנפש אלקית לידע ולהכיר את מי שאמר והיה העולם.2
For by that which comes forth from the mouth of Havayah, which is drawn into this bread, man and the G‑dly soul live, to know and to recognize Him Who spoke and the world came to be.
Through the word of G‑d drawn into this bread, the G‑dly soul gains life: the ability to know and recognize the Creator, “Him Who spoke and the world came to be.”
The paragraph brings the Zohar’s teaching that just as a child begins to understand only after tasting bread, Israel leaving Egypt came to know G‑d only after eating matzah, bread from the “supernal earth.”
Marei mekomos
- 1כך בצאת ישראל ממצרים לא ידעו · Zohar, Vayetzei 23:225–231
- 2
15וכמו שנמשך חיות סתם לנפש השכלית מלחם גשמי כנ״ל. כך נמשך מאכילת מצה בפסח חיות לדעת הנפש האלקית.
And just as plain life-force is drawn to the intellectual soul from physical bread, as mentioned above, so from eating matzah on Pesach life-force is drawn to the Daas of the G‑dly soul.
As ordinary bread gives the intellectual soul its life, so matzah on Pesach gives life to the Daas, the knowing, of the G‑dly soul.
והענין כי החמץ הוא בחי׳ הגבהה והתנשאות שתופח ועולה ומגביה א״ע [את עצמו], משא״כ מצה שאין בה שום הגבהה, וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] בעבודת ה׳ חמץ הוא בחי׳ התנשאות וגסות הקליפה משא״כ מצה בחינת שפלות והכנעה בבחי׳ בטל רצונך1
The explanation is that chametz is [the quality of] elevation and self-exaltation, for it swells and rises and raises itself up, whereas matzah has no elevation at all. So too in the service of G‑d: chametz is the self-exaltation and coarseness of the kelipah, whereas matzah is lowliness and submission, in the mode of “Nullify your will.”
Why matzah? Chametz is dough that swells and raises itself, an image of self-exaltation and of the coarseness of kelipah; matzah does not rise at all, an image of lowliness and submission, as in the Mishnah’s “Nullify your will before His will.”
[וזהו כי יתחמץ לבבי2 המשיל הלב הנוטה להרשיע לחמץ, וכן בלשון רז״ל [רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] (בר״ה [בראש השנה] ד״ג סע״ב [סוף עמוד ב]) כאן קודם שהחמיץ3 כאן לאחר שהחמיץ,4
[And this is “For my heart was soured (yischametz)”: [the verse] likens the heart that inclines to wickedness to chametz. And so in the language of our Sages, of blessed memory (Rosh HaShanah, folio 3, end of side b): “Here, before he soured; here, after he soured.”
The bracketed note gives examples of chametz as an image of evil: the verse “For my heart was soured” (Psalms 73:21), and the Talmud’s words about King Koresh (Cyrus) of Persia, who changed for the worse, “here, before he soured; here, after he soured” (Rosh HaShanah 3b).
וכן משלו היצה״ר [היצר הרע] לשאור ואמרו מי מעכב שאור שבעיסה5 מעכב והיינו מפני שבחי׳ גסות הוא מקור כל הנפילות לתאוות וכל מיני רע ה׳ ישמרנו].
And so too they likened the evil inclination to sourdough, and said, “Who holds [us] back? The sourdough in the dough holds [us] back.” This is because coarseness is the source of all the falls into lusts and every kind of evil, may G‑d protect us].
The Sages also compare the evil inclination to the sourdough in the dough (Berachos 17a): “Who holds us back? The sourdough in the dough.” The coarseness of self-inflation that chametz stands for is the source of every fall into desire and evil.
The paragraph explains why matzah gives life to the knowing of the G‑dly soul: chametz, which swells, stands for self-exaltation and the coarseness of kelipah, while matzah, which does not rise, stands for lowliness and the setting aside of one’s will.
Marei mekomos
- 1בטל רצונך · Pirkei Avot 2:4
- 2כי יתחמץ לבבי · Psalms 73:21
- 3כאן קודם שהחמיץ · על״ק סו״פ ברכה צט, ד. [כ].
- 4כאן קודם שהחמיץ כאן לאחר שהחמיץ · Rosh Hashanah 3b:10–12
- 5מי מעכב שאור שבעיסה · Berakhot 17a:2
16והנה ידוע דבגלות מצרים היו ישראל מקושרים מאד למטה והיה שכלם ומדותם בבחי׳ המיצרים וגבולים גשמיות העולם הגורמים להיות יש ונפרד כו׳,
Now, it is known that in the exile of Egypt, Israel were very much bound up below, and their intellect and their middos were in the straits (meitzarim) and limits of the world’s physicality, which cause [one] to be a separate existence (yesh), etc.
In the Egyptian exile the Jews were deeply attached to what is low and physical; their intellect and emotions were confined in the “straits” (meitzarim, מיצרים, the same letters as Mitzrayim, מצרים, Egypt) and limits of the physical world, which make a being feel itself a separate existence.
ועיקר יצ״מ [יציאת מצרים] הוא ע״י שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים שהוא בחי׳ אור א״ס ב״ה שלמעלה מסדר ההשתלשלות שעי״ז נמשך בהם בחי׳ הביטול
And the essence of the Exodus from Egypt was through there being revealed to them the King of the kings of kings, which is the level of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, that is above the order of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus); through this the quality of self-nullification (bittul) was drawn into them,
The Exodus came about mainly through the revelation of “the King of the kings of kings,” the Infinite Light that transcends the whole chain of worlds. This revelation drew self-nullification into them.
as the teaching says, “‘And with great awe’: this is the revelation of the Shechinah.” And through this bittul and higher awe (yirah ila’ah) they went out of all the straits and limits.
So “and with great awe” (Deuteronomy 26:8) is explained in the Sifrei, and in the Haggadah, as “the revelation of the Shechinah.” Through the bittul and the higher awe that this revelation brought, they left all their straits and limits.
The paragraph explains the inner meaning of the Exodus: Israel’s mind and heart were confined by the limits of physical existence, and the revelation of the Infinite Light from above all the worlds brought them self-nullification and higher awe, which set them free.
Marei mekomos
- 1ההשתלשלות — ובמורא גדול זו גילוי שכינה · Deuteronomy 26:8
- 2ובמורא גדול זו גילוי שכינה · Sifrei Devarim 301:21
- 3ובמורא גדול זו גילוי שכינה · Pesach Haggadah, Magid, First Fruits Declaration 22
17וכן יצ״מ [יציאת מצרים] בגשמיות כו׳ וזה היה אחר חצות לילה, אמנם נצטוו תחלה באכילת מצה קודם חצות כמ״ש בערב תאכלו מצת1
And so too the physical Exodus from Egypt, etc. And this was after midnight. But first they were commanded to eat matzah before midnight, as it is written, “In the evening you shall eat matzos,”
The physical Exodus likewise came through this revelation, after midnight. Before that, though, they were commanded to eat matzah before midnight: “In the evening you shall eat matzos” (Exodus 12:18).
שהוא בחי׳ ביטול רצון והכנעה ושפלות הנמשך מבחי׳ יראה תתאה שזה הוא ההכנה והכלי לבחי׳ הגילוי ויראה עילאה הנמשך ונתגלה להם אחר חצות כו׳,
which is the level of nullifying [one’s] will, submission and lowliness, drawn from the level of lower awe (yirah tata’ah); this is the preparation and the vessel for the revelation and the higher awe that was drawn down and revealed to them after midnight, etc.
That first matzah expresses setting aside one’s will, submission and lowliness, which come from lower awe (yirah tata’ah), the fear of a subject before the King. This lower awe was the preparation and the vessel for the revelation of higher awe after midnight.
וגם נק׳ המצה בזהר מיכלא דמהימנותא2 שהאמונה הוא ג״כ בחי׳ ביטול שמבטל שכלו ואינו מבקש טעם רק מאמין האמת באמונה הטהורה.
And also, the matzah is called in the Zohar “the food of faith” (michla di-mehemnusa), for faith too is a level of bittul: one nullifies his intellect and seeks no reason, but believes the truth with pure faith.
The Zohar calls matzah “the food of faith” (michla di-mehemnusa). Faith too is a kind of bittul: a person sets aside his own intellect and does not demand reasons, but believes the truth with pure faith. In the maamar before this one (Likkutei Torah, Tzav 12b), the Alter Rebbe gives the reason for the name: matzah draws down the level of Abba, which is above comprehended knowledge, but in smallness, like the child’s knowing to call “Father.”
The paragraph identifies the matzah of before midnight with lower awe and submission, which prepared Israel to receive the higher revelation after midnight, and connects it with the Zohar’s name for matzah, “the food of faith.”
Marei mekomos
- 1בערב תאכלו מצות · Exodus 12:18
- 2נק׳ המצה בזהר מיכלא דמהימנותא · נסמן לעיל יב, ב.
18ונמשך בחי׳ זו בנשמה ע״י מצות אכילת מצה. והוא ע״ד שנז׳ [שנזכר] לעיל ממשל שהלחם מחיה את האדם, והוא ע״ד מ״ש רז״ל [רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שאין התינוק יודע לקרות אבא עד שיטעום1 כו׳,
And this level is drawn into the soul through the mitzvah of eating matzah. This is along the lines of what was mentioned above, from the analogy that bread gives life to man, and it is along the lines of what our Sages, of blessed memory, said, that a child does not know how to call “Father” until he tastes, etc.
This faith is drawn into the soul through the mitzvah of eating matzah. It works like the analogy above, that bread gives a person life, and like the Sages’ saying that a child does not know to call “Father” until he tastes grain.
דהנה ידיעת התינוק להיות קורא אבא שנמשך ונתחדש בו ע״י שטעם טעם לחם, אין ידיעה זו אצלו בבחי׳ הבנה וטעם ודעת גמור שהרי אינו יודע איך הוא אביו ולמה צריך לאהוב אותו ועכ״ז [ועם כל זה] הוא קורא אביו
For the child’s knowing to call “Father,” which was drawn into him and newly arose in him through his tasting the taste of bread, is not in him as understanding, reason and complete knowledge, for he does not know how [this is] his father or why he must love him; and nevertheless he calls his father.
The child’s new ability to call “Father,” which comes from tasting bread, is not real understanding: he does not know how this man is his father or why he should love him, and still he calls out to him.
ונמצא זו הקריאה הוא ההתקשרות שלו באביו שלא ע״י טעם ודעת המושג אצלו כ״א בבחי׳ הכרה בלבד והוא בחי׳ קטנות מאד למטה מן הטעם ודעת.
It turns out that this calling is his bond with his father, not through reason and knowledge that he grasps, but only as recognition; and it is a level of very great smallness (katnus), beneath reason and knowledge.
So his calling is a bond with his father that comes not from understanding but from bare recognition. It is a very immature state (katnus), below reason and knowledge.
The paragraph explains the faith that matzah brings by the analogy of the child who, after tasting bread, calls “Father” without understanding why: his bond is recognition, not reasoning.
Marei mekomos
- 1שאין התינוק יודע לקרות אבא עד שיטעום · Berakhot 40a:14
19ומ״מ ההתקשרות ההוא חזק מאד עד שנפשו קשורהמאד בנפש אביו. והיינו מפני שהדעת ההוא שנתחדש בתינוק ע״י טעם לחם שרשו משרש הלחם
Nevertheless, that bond is very strong, so much so that his soul is very bound to his father’s soul. That is because that knowing, which newly arose in the child through the taste of bread, has its root in the root of the bread,
Yet this bond is very strong; the child’s soul is tightly bound to his father’s. The reason is that this knowing, which came from bread, shares the root of bread.
שהוא מעולם התהו שהוא בחי׳ שלמעלה מהדעת המושג כנ״ל למעלה מהחכמה כו׳, ולכן נמשך בבחי׳ שלמטה מהדעת המושג כו׳, וע״כ ההתקשרות חזק מאד.
which is from the World of Tohu, which is a level above comprehended knowledge, as mentioned above, above Chochmah, etc.; and therefore it is drawn down in a level that is beneath comprehended knowledge, etc., and therefore the bond is very strong.
That root is in Tohu, above comprehended knowledge and above Chochmah. Because it is so high, it comes down below comprehended knowledge, as recognition rather than understanding, and for that very reason the bond is so strong.
The paragraph explains why the child’s bond, though below understanding, is so strong: it comes from a root above understanding, in Tohu, and that is why it appears beneath understanding.
The paragraph applies a principle found throughout Chassidus, that what is higher descends lower: because the root of this bond is above intellect, it cannot appear within intellect, and it shows itself beneath it, as simple recognition and faith.
20וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] בענין אכילת מצוה דמצה שנק׳ בזהר מיכלא דמהימנותא שהאמונה היא ההכרה והדעת וההתקשרות בהקב״ה
So too with the eating of matzah as a mitzvah, [matzah] being called in the Zohar “the food of faith”: for faith is the recognition, the knowing and the bond with the Holy One, blessed be He.
Matzah, “the food of faith,” works in the same way. Faith, as the text defines it, is the recognition and knowing of G‑d and the bond with Him.
וכל ישראל מאמינים שהוא לבדו הוא כמו שהיה קודם שנברא העולם ממש כדכתיב אני הוי׳ לא שניתי1 [ע׳ [עיין] בפ׳ ואתחנן בד״ה וידעת היום2 ביאור ענין דעת ואמונה].
And all Israel believe that He alone is, exactly as He was before the world was created, as it is written, “I, Havayah, have not changed” [see in Parshas Va’eschanan, in the discourse beginning “And you shall know this day,” the explanation of the matter of knowledge and faith].
Every Jew believes that G‑d alone is, exactly as He was before the world was created, as Malachi 3:6 says, “I, Havayah, have not changed”: creation has made no change in Him. The bracketed note refers to the discourse “And you shall know this day” in Likkutei Torah, Va’eschanan, which explains the difference: sensing the life-force that fills the worlds is “knowledge,” as if one saw it, while that G‑d is unchanged by the worlds can be held only by faith.
The paragraph defines the faith that matzah, “the food of faith,” brings: a recognition of G‑d and a bond with Him, the belief that He alone exists, unchanged by creation.
Marei mekomos
- 1אני הוי׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
- 2בד״ה וידעת היום · לקו״ד ואתחנן ד, א.
21והמשכה זו הוא מבחי׳ דעת עליון כי א״ס ב״ה הוא למעלה מהחכמה כו׳ ולכן נמשך ומתלבש בבחי׳ אמונה.
And this drawing-down is from the level of supernal Daas, for the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, is above Chochmah, etc.; therefore it is drawn down and clothed in the level of faith.
This faith flows from supernal Daas, a knowing higher than Chochmah, because the Infinite One is above Chochmah. What is above intellect can reach a person only as faith, not as understanding.
ולכך המצה היא מיכלא דמהימנותא שהרי הלחם שרשו מבחי׳ זו כנ״ל מענין ידיעת התינוק להיות קורא אבא ע״י הלחם כו׳ אלא שזהו בהשכלת ענין עוה״ז שנמשך מהלחם גשמי הנמשך מארץ הגשמיות.
And therefore matzah is “the food of faith,” for the root of bread is from this level, as mentioned above regarding the child’s knowing to call “Father” through bread, etc.; except that this is in the understanding of matters of this world, which is drawn from physical bread, drawn from the earth of physicality.
That is why matzah is “the food of faith”: bread has its root in this level, as the child’s calling “Father” after eating bread shows. But ordinary bread, which comes from the physical earth, gives only understanding of the matters of this world.
אמנם בלחם דמצה בפסח נמשך ומתלבש הכח מבחי׳ ארץ עליונה שממנה יצא לחם הממשיך בחי׳ זו באלקות ממש שידע לקרות את אבא שבשמים כו׳ בהתקשרות חזקה עד מיצוי הנפש כו׳ אף שאינו משיג בשכל והשגה ממש.
But in the bread of matzah on Pesach there is drawn down and clothed the power from the level of the supernal earth, from which bread comes forth, which draws down this level in [relation to] G‑dliness itself, so that one knows to call [to] the Father in Heaven, etc., with a strong bond, to the point of the soul’s being wrung out, etc., even though he does not actually grasp [it] with intellect and comprehension.
The matzah of Pesach draws its power from the “supernal earth,” and it brings this kind of knowing to bear on G‑dliness itself: a Jew comes to call to his Father in Heaven with a strong bond, to the point of the soul’s being wrung out in longing, though he cannot grasp G‑d with his intellect.
The paragraph explains why matzah is called the food of faith: like bread, it is rooted above intellect, but its source is the supernal earth, so the bond it brings is a bond with G‑d Himself.
22וזהו בחי׳ ביטול. ומזה נמשך ג״כ בחי׳ בטל רצונך12 ובחי׳ שפלות ונפשי כעפר3 לכל תהיה שזהו כח בחי׳ ארץ שממנה יצא לחם4
And this is the level of self-nullification (bittul). From this there is also drawn the level of “Nullify your will,” and the level of lowliness, “and let my soul be as dust to all,” which is the power of the level of “earth” from which bread comes forth.
This faith is bittul, self-nullification. From it come the setting aside of one’s will (“Nullify your will,” Avos 2:4) and the lowliness of the prayer “Let my soul be as dust to all” (Berachos 17a), which express the quality of “earth,” the source of bread.
[ועמ״ש ע״פ וישב יעקב5 בארץ מגורי אביו6 ועמ״ש ע״פ ויגש אליו יהודה78 מענין בחי׳ ארץ שבמחשבה ארץ קדמה אפילו לשמים ולכן דוקא ממנה יצא לחם כו׳ הנ״ל]:
[And see what is written on the verse “And Yaakov dwelt in the land of his father’s sojournings,” and see what is written on the verse “And Yehudah approached him,” concerning the level of “earth”: that in thought, earth came first, even before heaven, and therefore it is specifically from it that bread comes forth, etc., as mentioned above.]
The bracketed note refers to the Torah Ohr discourses on “And Yaakov dwelt” and on “And Yehudah approached him,” which explain the level of “earth”: in thought the earth came first, even before the heavens, and that is why bread comes from it.
The paragraph identifies the faith of matzah with bittul and lowliness, the qualities of the “earth” from which bread comes forth.
Later in the maamar (section 5) the Alter Rebbe identifies “earth” with Malchus of Atzilus, the level that gives existence to created beings; the lowliness of “earth” is thus the source of bread both below and above.
Marei mekomos
- 1בטל רצונך · אבות פ״ב, מ״ד.
- 2בטל רצונך · Pirkei Avot 2:4
- 3ונפשי כעפר · Berakhot 17a:4
- 4ארץ שממנה יצא לחם · Job 28:5
- 5ע״פ וישב יעקב · תו״א כו, ג.
- 6וישב יעקב בארץ מגורי אביו · Genesis 37:1
- 7ע״פ ויגש אליו יהודה · תו״א מג, ג.
- 8ויגש אליו יהודה · Genesis 44:18
Guarded and unguarded matzah ¶23–27
23ד והנה בחי׳ מצה זו צריכה שימור כמ״ש ושמרתם את המצות1 דהיינו לשמור מן החיצונים שלא לבוא לבחי׳ חימוץ שהוא הגסות וההתנשאות,
4. Now, this level of matzah requires guarding, as it is written, “And you shall guard the matzos,” that is, to guard [it] from the external forces, so that it not come to the level of leavening, which is coarseness and self-exaltation;
The fourth section turns to the guarding of matzah. The Torah says, “And you shall guard the matzos” (Exodus 12:17): the dough must be watched so that it does not leaven, and inwardly it must be guarded from the external forces, the forces of kelipah, so that it does not turn into the coarseness and self-exaltation of chametz.
והיינו להיותה בבחי׳ יראה תתאה והתקשרות האמונה בלבד למטה מן הטעם ודעת ע״כ צריכה שימור.
that is, because it is at the level of lower awe (yirah tata’ah) and the bond of faith alone, beneath reason and knowledge, it therefore requires guarding.
This matzah needs guarding because it stands only at the level of lower awe and simple faith, beneath reason and knowledge, a level that can still be spoiled.
The paragraph explains that the first matzah, of lower awe and simple faith, must be guarded from the external forces so that it does not turn into the self-exaltation of chametz.
Marei mekomos
- 1ושמרתם את המצות · Exodus 12:17
24וע״כ נק׳ מצת חסר וי״ו להיותו עדיין בבחי׳ קטנות.
And therefore it is called מצת, lacking a vav, since it is still at the level of smallness.
That is why the first matzah is spelled מצת, without a vav: it is still in a state of smallness (katnus), without the vav of the drawing-down from above.
גם מצת חסר וי״ו הוא מלשון מצותא כמו מצה ומריבה1 כדאי׳ [כדאיתא] בזהר ח״ג [חלק ג׳] דרנ״א ב׳ שהמריבה הוא להיות ביטול היש והגסות ע״ד לעולם ירגיז אדם2 יצ״ט [יצר טוב] על יצה״ר [יצר הרע] כו׳ וע״כ היתה קודם חצות.
Also, מצת lacking a vav is from the language of matzusa (strife), as in “strife (matzah) and quarrel (merivah),” as is stated in the Zohar, Part III, folio 251b. The quarrel is in order to bring about the nullification of the yesh and of the coarseness, in the manner of “A person should always stir up his good inclination against his evil inclination,” etc.; and therefore it was before midnight.
The spelling also recalls matzusa, Aramaic for strife. The Zohar (Pinchas, 3:251b) says that matzah drives away the forces of evil and makes strife among them, as in “Massah and Merivah” (Exodus 17:7); it objects that massah (מסה) is spelled with a samekh, and answers that its Aramaic rendering is matzusa. Here the strife is a person’s quarrel with his own sense of self and coarseness, as the Sages say, “A person should always stir up his good inclination against his evil inclination” (Berachos 5a); that is the matzah of before midnight.
משא״כ ענין המצה הב׳ הוא אחר חצות דוקא אחר קרבן הפסח3 אחר שנגלה עליהם כו׳.
Whereas the matter of the second matzah is specifically after midnight, after the Pesach offering, after there was revealed to them, etc.
The second matzah comes only after midnight, after the Pesach offering, when the King of the kings of kings was revealed to them.
דהנה ענין הפסח הוא מ״ש ופסח ה׳ שהוא ענין דילוג והמשכה שלא כסדר ההשתלשלות וכמ״ש ובמורא גדול זו גילוי שכינה4
For the matter of Pesach is what is written, “And Havayah will pass over (u-fasach),” which is the matter of skipping, a drawing-down that is not according to the order of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus), as it is said, “‘And with great awe’: this is the revelation of the Shechinah,”
“Pesach” means passing over: “And Havayah will pass over (u-fasach)” (Exodus 12:23) is a leap, a drawing-down that does not follow the step-by-step order of the worlds. It is the “great awe” that the Sifrei and the Haggadah explain as the revelation of the Shechinah.
שהוא בחי׳ אור א״ס ב״ה שלמעלה מעלה מהשתלשלות העולמות שהיה מאיר ומתגלה אז בנפשם האלקית, וזהו עד שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים.
which is the level of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, that is far above the chain of descent of the worlds, which then shone and was revealed in their G‑dly soul. And this is “before there was revealed to them the King of the kings of kings.”
That revelation was of the Infinite Light that is far above all the worlds, shining openly in their G‑dly souls. This is what the Haggadah means by “before the King of the kings of kings was revealed to them.”
פי׳ מלכי המלכים הן ד׳ בחי׳ מלכות שמאיר בארבע עולמות אבי״ע [אצילות בריאה יצירה עשיה] ומלך מלכי המלכים הוא בחי׳ מלכות דא״ס שלמעלה מעלה מהשתלשלות ד׳ עולמות אבי״ע [אצילות בריאה יצירה עשיה]
That is, “the kings of kings” are the four levels of Malchus that shine in the four worlds of Atzilus, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah; and “the King of the kings of kings” is the level of the Malchus of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), which is far above the chain of descent of the four worlds of Atzilus, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.
“The kings of kings” are the four levels of Malchus (sovereignty) that rule in each of the four worlds, Atzilus, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah. “The King of the kings of kings” is the Malchus of the Infinite One Himself, far above all four worlds.
[וזהו בחי׳ בריש הורמנותא דמלכא5 הנז׳ [הנזכר] בזהר בראשית דט״ו כ״כ [כל כך] בספר אשל אברהם6 שם] שע״י בחי׳ הגילוי זה דוקא וגאלם וכמ״ש ועברתי בארץ מצרים7 אני ולא מלאך.891011
[And this is the level of “At the head of the King’s authority” (beresh hurmanusa de-malka) mentioned in the Zohar, Bereishis, folio 15; so writes the book Eshel Avraham there.] For it was specifically through this level of revelation that “He redeemed them,” as it is said, “‘And I will pass through the land of Egypt’: I, and not an angel.”
The bracketed note identifies this with the Zohar’s opening words, “At the head of the King’s authority,” as the book Eshel Avraham explains that passage; in Likkutei Torah, Chukas, the Alter Rebbe quotes it: this is the Malchus of the Infinite One, what arose in His simple will, that He be called King. It was this revelation itself that redeemed Israel, as the Haggadah says on “And I will pass through the land of Egypt”: “I, and not an angel.”
The paragraph contrasts the two matzos: the first, before midnight, is in smallness and is a “strife” against the evil inclination; the second, after midnight, comes from the revelation of the King of the kings of kings, the Malchus of the Infinite One, which “passed over” the order of the worlds and redeemed Israel.
The Kehot note points to Likkutei Torah, Chukas, where the reading of Eshel Avraham is quoted: “At the head of the King’s authority” is the King of the kings of kings, the Malchus of the Infinite One, that is, what arose in His simple will, that He be called King.
Marei mekomos
- 1מצותא כמו מצה ומריבה · Zohar, Pinchas 105:727–106:740
- 2לעולם ירגיז אדם · Berakhot 5a:2
- 3ופסח ה׳ · Exodus 12:23
- 4ובמורא גדול זו גילוי שכינה · Sifrei Devarim 301:21
- 5בריש הורמנותא דמלכא · Zohar, Bereshit 1:1–2:7
- 6כ״כ בספר אשל אברהם · ראה לקמן פ׳ חוקת נט, ג.
- 7וכמ״ש ועברתי בארץ מצרים · Exodus 12:12
- 8אני ולא מלאך · הגדה ש״פ. ספרי שם.
- 9ועברתי בארץ מצרים אני ולא מלאך · Sifrei Devarim 301:18
- 10ועברתי בארץ מצרים אני ולא מלאך · Pesach Haggadah, Magid, First Fruits Declaration 19
- 11
25ולכן נק׳ גילוי זה ובמורא גדול1 כי יראה לשון נוק׳ [נוקבא] זהו בחי׳ יראה תתאה הנמשך מבחי׳ מל׳ דאבי״ע [דאצילות בריאה יצירה עשיה] בכל עולם לפי ערכו.
And therefore this revelation is called “and with great awe (mora gadol).” For yirah (awe) is a feminine term: this is the level of lower awe, drawn from the level of the Malchus of Atzilus, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, in each world according to its measure.
This is why the revelation is called mora gadol, “great awe.” The usual Hebrew word for awe, yirah (יראה), is feminine, and it stands for lower awe, which flows from Malchus in each of the four worlds according to its level.
אכן מורא גדול לשון זכר זהו בחי׳ יראה עילאה שהוא בחי׳ דכר ונמשך ע״י גילוי בחי׳ מלך מלכי המלכים כנ״ל וזהו ענין המצה הב׳ שאחר חצות דמצה הוא בחי׳ ביטול כנ״ל,
But mora gadol is a masculine term: this is the level of higher awe (yirah ila’ah), which is the level of the masculine (dechar), and it is drawn down through the revelation of the level of the King of the kings of kings, as mentioned above. And this is the matter of the second matzah, of after midnight, for matzah is the level of bittul, as mentioned above;
Mora (מורא) is a masculine word, and it stands for higher awe, the masculine aspect, which comes from the revelation of the King of the kings of kings. This is the second matzah, of after midnight, since matzah is bittul.
אך מצה דקודם חצות הוא בחי׳ יראה תתאה ואמונה כמו שנתלבשה בבחי׳ שלמטה מהדעת המושג כנ״ל,
but the matzah of before midnight is the level of lower awe and of faith as it is clothed in a level beneath comprehended knowledge, as mentioned above;
The matzah of before midnight, by contrast, is lower awe and faith, clothed in a level beneath comprehended knowledge.
and this is the level of “When Israel was a youth,” etc., “the kindness of your youth,” etc., and “Out of Egypt I called My son,” etc., and like the child’s calling “Father,” etc.
This is Israel as a child: “When Israel was a youth, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called My son” (Hosea 11:1), and “I remember for you the kindness of your youth” (Jeremiah 2:2), like the child who calls “Father” without understanding.
אבל בחי׳ הביטול דמצה זו שאחר חצות היא בחי׳ ביטול אמיתי ויראה עילאה שנמשך בחי׳ גילוי מה שלמעלה מהדעת המושג שהאיר אז בנפשם,
But the level of bittul of this matzah of after midnight is the level of true bittul and higher awe, in which there was drawn down a revelation of what is above comprehended knowledge, which shone then in their souls;
The bittul of the after-midnight matzah is true bittul and higher awe, because a revelation of what is above comprehended knowledge shone in their souls.
והיינו מבחי׳ הגילוי אור א״ס שלמעלה מההשתלשלות שהאיר אז עליהם מלמעלה למטה בבחי׳ אתעדל״ע [אתערותא דלעילא], וזהו ענין ובמורא גדול זו גילוי שכינה,4
that is, from the level of the revelation of the Infinite Light that is above the chain of descent, which then shone upon them from above to below, as an arousal from above (isarusa dile’eila). And this is the matter of “‘And with great awe’: this is the revelation of the Shechinah.”
It came from the Infinite Light above the chain of worlds, shining down from above as an arousal from above, not as a response to their own service. This is the “great awe” that the Sifrei and the Haggadah call the revelation of the Shechinah.
וע״כ בחי׳ מצה זו א״צ [אין צריך / אינו צריך] שימור מחימוץ כלל שהוא בחי׳ הישות והגסות מאחר שאין לחיצונים בחי׳ אחיזה ויניקה כלל מבחי׳ זו, [כי יראה עילאה הוא אור אבא שדוחה החיצונים, רק בחי׳ יראה תתאה צריכה שימור כו׳].
And therefore this level of matzah needs no guarding at all from leavening, which is the level of selfhood and coarseness, since the external forces have no hold [on it] and draw no nurture at all from this level [for higher awe is the light of Abba, which repels the external forces; only the level of lower awe requires guarding, etc.].
Therefore this matzah needs no guarding at all from leavening, which is selfhood and coarseness: the external forces have no hold on this level and draw nothing from it. The bracketed note explains that higher awe is the light of Abba (Chochmah), which drives the external forces away; only lower awe needs guarding.
The paragraph distinguishes lower awe (yirah), the childlike faith of the first matzah that must be guarded, from higher awe (mora), the true bittul of the second matzah, revealed from above, which needs no guarding because the external forces cannot touch it.
Marei mekomos
- 1ובמורא גדול · Deuteronomy 26:8
- 2כי נער ישראל · Hosea 11:1
- 3חסד נעוריך · Jeremiah 2:2
- 4ובמורא גדול זו גילוי שכינה · Sifrei Devarim 301:21
And this is the meaning of “the dough of our fathers did not have time to leaven before there was revealed to them”: it refers to the second level.
This is the meaning of the Haggadah’s words, “the dough of our fathers did not have time to leaven before the King of the kings of kings was revealed to them”: they speak of the second matzah.
דאין ביכולתו להחמיץ כלל מפני עוצם הגילוי דבחי׳ מלך מלכי המלכים שנגלה עליהם שאין שם יניקה ואחיזה לחיצונים שהוא היש וההתנשאות שנק׳ חמץ.
For it does not have the ability to leaven at all, because of the intensity of the revelation of the level of the King of the kings of kings that was revealed to them, where there is no nurture and no hold for the external forces, which is the yesh and the self-exaltation that are called chametz.
That dough could not leaven at all, because the revelation was so intense that the external forces, the self-assertion and self-exaltation called chametz, had no hold there.
The paragraph reads the Haggadah’s phrase as describing the second matzah: in the face of the revelation of the King of the kings of kings, leavening, which is self-exaltation, was impossible.
Marei mekomos
- 1שלא הספיק בצקת של אבותינו להחמיץ עד שנגלה עליהם · Pesach Haggadah, Magid, Rabban Gamliel's Three Things 4
And this is [the meaning of] “And they baked the dough,” etc., “cakes of matzos, for it had not leavened”: that is to say, it did not come to leavening.
This explains Exodus 12:39, “cakes of matzos, for it had not leavened”: the dough simply did not come to leavening.
והיינו להיות כי גורשו ממצרים שאין שום אחיזה כלל למצרים בבחי׳ זו שנגלה עליהם כו׳ וא״כ ממילא נמשך מזה כי לא חמץ כו׳,
And that is because “they were driven out of Egypt”: Egypt has no hold whatsoever on this level, [in] which there was revealed to them, etc.; and if so, it follows of itself that “it had not leavened,” etc.
The reason was not haste but that “they were driven out of Egypt”: Egypt, with its limits and its forces of kelipah, had no hold at all on the level that was revealed to them, so the dough could not leaven.
ולכן אף שבהליכתם ממצרים עד בואם לרעמסס2 אף שהיה להם קפיצת הדרך3 מ״מ בצירוף עד שהציתו האש לאפות ודאי שהה הבצק יותר מכדי שיעור חימוץ ועכ״ז [ועם כל זה] לא חמץ מטעם הנ״ל (ומתורץ בזה א׳ מהקושיות דלעיל).
And therefore, even though on their way from Egypt until they came to Ramses they had a contraction of the road (kefitzas haderech), nevertheless, together with [the time] until they lit the fire to bake, the dough certainly stood longer than the time it takes to leaven; and even so it did not leaven, for the reason mentioned above (and this resolves one of the questions above).
Even though the road was miraculously shortened for them, the time on the way together with the time until they lit the fire to bake was certainly longer than dough needs to leaven; yet it did not leaven, for the reason just given, and this answers one of the questions at the start. The Kehot note cites Rashi that they covered the distance from Ramses to Sukkos in a moment (Exodus 12:37), and that all Israel, scattered through Goshen, were gathered to Ramses in a short time, “on eagles’ wings” (Exodus 19:4, from the Mechilta). It adds that where this maamar says “until they came to Ramses,” the version in the Siddur says “in Sukkos,” depending on the Sages’ views of where they baked the dough.
וע״כ נאמר כאן מצות מלא בוי״ו שהוי״ו הוא המשכה הנמשך בהם מבחי׳ מורא גדול ויראה עילאה
And therefore here it says מצות, full, with a vav, for the vav is the drawing-down that was drawn into them from the level of great awe (mora gadol) and higher awe,
That is why this verse spells מצות with a vav: the vav is the drawing-down into them of great awe, the higher awe.
וכמו שאומרים בתפלה והנורא אל עליון בתוספת וי״ו משא״כ הגדול הגבור4 בלא וי״ו [וכמ״ש במ״א בפרשה ואתחנן בד״ה וידעת היום5 כו׳].
as we say in prayer, “and the awesome (ve-hanora), G‑d Most High,” with an added vav, whereas “the great, the mighty” [are said] without a vav [as is explained elsewhere, in Parshas Va’eschanan, in the discourse beginning “And you shall know this day,” etc.].
Likewise in the Amidah we say “the great, the mighty and the awesome (ve-hanora),” following Deuteronomy 10:17, and only “awesome,” which expresses higher awe, carries the added vav. The text refers to its discourse on “And you shall know this day” in Parshas Va’eschanan.
משא״כ בחי׳ יראה תתאה נק׳ עדיין מצת חסר וי״ו ולכן היא צריכה שימור מהחיצונים אבל בחי׳ מצה הב׳ שנק׳ מצות מלא בוי״ו א״צ [אין צריך / אינו צריך] שימור
Whereas the level of lower awe is still called מצת, lacking a vav, and therefore it needs guarding from the external forces; but the level of the second matzah, which is called מצות, full with a vav, needs no guarding
Lower awe is still the מצת without a vav and needs guarding from the external forces; the second matzah, מצות with a vav, needs none.
(ועמ״ש ר״פ אלה תולדות6 מענין שמות כשמת7 מלא וי״ו וחסר וי״ו ע״ש ועמ״ש בפ׳ נשא ע״פ וישמרך ויחונך8 כו׳):
(and see what is written at the beginning of Parshas “These are the generations,” on the matter of “names (שמות) like the names (כשמת),” full with a vav and lacking a vav; see there. And see what is written in Parshas Naso on the verse “and guard you… and be gracious to you,” etc.).
The text points to two parallels: Torah Ohr at the beginning of Parshas Toldos, on the wells to which Yitzchak gave “names (שמות) like the names (כשמת)” his father had given (Genesis 26:18), one spelled with a vav and one without; and Likkutei Torah, Naso, on the Priestly Blessing, “and guard you… and be gracious to you.”
The paragraph answers the question about Exodus 12:39: the dough did not leaven because the revelation left Egypt no hold, not for lack of time; this is why מצות here has a vav, the drawing-down of higher awe, and why this matzah needs no guarding.
In Torah Ohr, Toldos, the full spelling שמות belongs to Yitzchak’s wells, whose flow was never stopped again, the vav standing for the six emotive attributes that flow forth; Avraham’s שמת lacks the vav because the Philistines stopped up the wells and the external forces could draw from them. That passage itself refers back to this maamar on מצות with a vav.
Marei mekomos
- 1ויאפו את הבצק כו׳ עוגות מצות כי לא חמץ · Exodus 12:39
- 2בואם לרעמסס · Rashi on Exodus 19:4
- 3שהי׳ להם קפיצת הדרך · רש״י שמות יב, לז. וגם קיבוץ כל ישראל לרעמסס הי׳ ”לשעה קלה” על כנפי נשרים פרש״י יתרו יט, ד. ממכילתא שם — ולהעיר מלקו״ת צו יד, א. ובכהנ״ל ”בואם לרעמסס”. ובסידור (שא, א) ”בסוכות”, ותלוי בדרז״ל ”ויאפו את הבצק” באיזה מקום אפו. ראה תו״ש עה״פ בא יב, לט. — לקו״ש חי״ח ע׳ 391.
- 4הגדול הגבור והנורא · Deuteronomy 10:17
- 5
- 6ועמ״ש ר״פ אלה תולדות · תו״א יז, ג.
- 7שמות כשמת · Genesis 26:18
- 8וישמרך ויחונך · Numbers 6:24–25
Our matzah before midnight ¶28–33
28והנה מעתה י״ל [יש לומר] תירוץ הקושיא הנז׳ [הנזכר] לעיל
Now, from here we can give the answer to the question mentioned above.
The Alter Rebbe now answers the question about the Haggadah raised earlier: how can the matzah we eat before midnight be explained by “the dough did not have time to leaven”?
איך אנו אומרים במצה זו שאנו אוכלים קודם חצות לילה שהוא על שום שלא הספיק בצקת כו׳, והרי זהו בחי׳ ומדרגת המצה הב׳ שלא היתה אלא לאחר שנגלה כו׳ דהיינו אחר חצות.
How do we say of this matzah, which we eat before midnight, that it is “because the dough did not have time,” etc., when this is the level and rung of the second matzah, which came only after there was revealed, etc., that is, after midnight?
The difficulty is that this phrase describes the second matzah, which existed only after the revelation at midnight.
אך הענין הוא כי כ״ז [כל זה] דוקא בזמן שהיו ישראל אז בגלות מצרים1
But the explanation is that all this was specifically at the time when Israel were then in the exile of Egypt,
The answer is that the division between the two matzos belonged to the time in Egypt, when Israel had not yet received the Torah and mitzvos. A manuscript of the maamar adds here: “and they did not know and recognize G‑dliness so much.”
ולא היה להם תורה ומצות עדיין ע״כ לא היה ביכולתם לקבל בחי׳ הגילוי העצום דבחי׳ מורא גדול ולהיות בהם בחי׳ ביטול ויראה עילאה קודם חצות.
and did not yet have Torah and mitzvos; therefore they were not able to receive the intense revelation of the level of great awe, or to have in them the level of bittul and higher awe, before midnight.
Without Torah and mitzvos they could not receive the intense revelation of great awe, the bittul and higher awe, before midnight.
אלא קודם חצות הי׳ [היה] רק בחי׳ מצת חסר וי״ו דהיינו בחי׳ יראה תתאה בטל רצונך.
Rather, before midnight there was only the level of מצת lacking a vav, that is, the level of lower awe, “Nullify your will.”
Before midnight they had only the first matzah, מצת without a vav: lower awe, the setting aside of one’s will.
The paragraph begins to answer the question about the Seder matzah: the separation between the two matzos applied only in Egypt, before the giving of the Torah, when Israel could have only lower awe before midnight.
Marei mekomos
- 1אז בגלות מצרים · בבוך 2031 נוסף: ”ולא היו יודעים ומכירים באלקות כ״כ”.
29ועי״ז דוקא היו יכולים לקבל בחי׳ הגילוי הנ״ל אחר חצות ועי״ז נמשך בהם בחי׳ שלא הספיק בצקת כו׳.
And specifically through this they were able to receive the revelation mentioned above after midnight, and through this there was drawn into them the level of “the dough did not have time,” etc.
It was precisely through that lower awe that they could receive the revelation after midnight, which brought them the level of “the dough did not have time to leaven.”
אבל לאחר שקיבלו ישראל תורה ומצות בהר סיני והרי בכל השנה כולה גם קודם הפסח ממשיכים המשכת אלקות ע״י תורה ומצות
But after Israel received the Torah and mitzvos at Mount Sinai, and [now], throughout the entire year, also before Pesach, we draw down a drawing-down of G‑dliness through Torah and mitzvos,
But since the giving of the Torah at Sinai, Jews draw G‑dliness down all year through Torah and mitzvos, in the time before Pesach as well.
ע״כ גם במצה זו שאנו אוכלים קודם חצות יכולים אנו [על ידי קיום התורה ומצות שקדם כל השנה]1 לקבל בחי׳ גילוי שכינה מבחי׳ שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים אחר חצות כו׳.
therefore also with this matzah that we eat before midnight we are able [through the fulfillment of the Torah and mitzvos that preceded it all year] to receive the level of the revelation of the Shechinah, from the level [of] “there was revealed to them the King of the kings of kings,” after midnight, etc.
So even the matzah we eat before midnight, thanks to the Torah and mitzvos of the whole preceding year, can receive the revelation of the Shechinah that came to them only after midnight, the revelation of the King of the kings of kings. According to the Kehot note, these bracketed words are quoted in Sefer HaMaamarim, which explains there that this is an even higher revelation.
The paragraph explains that since Sinai, the Torah and mitzvos of the whole year enable the matzah eaten before midnight to receive the revelation that in Egypt came only after midnight.
Marei mekomos
- 1[ע״י קיום התורה ומצות שקדם כל השנה] · מובא בסה״מ קונטרסים מלוקט-ג ע׳ קיד ומבאר שם שהוא גילוי נעלה יותר.
30וכמ״ש בזהר ויצא הנ״ל מצה בקדמיתא1 ולבתר מצוה. בתוספת2 וא״ו ע״ש. נמצא בחי׳ מצוה זהו מבחינת ומדרגת מצה הב׳ שהיא מצות מלא וי״ו.
As is written in the Zohar, Vayetze, mentioned above: “First matzah, and afterward mitzvah,” with the addition of a vav; see there. It follows that the level of mitzvah is of the level and rung of the second matzah, which is מצות, full with a vav.
This matches the Zohar cited above (Vayetze 157a): “First matzah, and afterward mitzvah,” mitzvah (מצוה) being matzah (מצה) with an added vav. So “mitzvah” belongs to the level of the second matzah, מצות with a vav.
והיינו לפי שע״י קיום התורה ומצות נמשך בחי׳ תר״ך עמודי אור3 דכתר עליון שזהו עצמו ענין שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים כו׳
That is because through the fulfillment of the Torah and mitzvos there is drawn down the level of the 620 pillars of light of the supernal Keser (Crown), which is itself the matter of “there was revealed to them the King of the kings of kings,” etc.;
Through Torah and mitzvos, the “620 pillars of light” of the supernal Keser are drawn down, and this is the very revelation of the King of the kings of kings. The number 620 is the numerical value of כתר, Keser.
ולכן מה שנמשך להם בחצות לילה שהוא עת רצון נמשך לנו במצה זו שאנו אוכלים קודם חצות, והיינו מצד שיש לנו תורה ומצות שהן הן עצמיות רצון העליון כו׳.4
and therefore what was drawn to them at midnight, which is a time of favor (eis ratzon), is drawn to us in this matzah that we eat before midnight; that is, because we have Torah and mitzvos, which are the very essence of the supernal will, etc.
So what came to them at midnight, a time of divine favor (eis ratzon), comes to us in the matzah we eat before midnight, because Torah and mitzvos are the very essence of the supernal will.
The paragraph grounds the answer in the Zohar’s “first matzah, then mitzvah”: Torah and mitzvos draw down the 620 pillars of light of Keser, the revelation of the King of the kings of kings, so we receive before midnight what came to them only at midnight.
The Kehot note gives the Kabbalistic sources for the 620 pillars of light: Rabbi Moshe Botril’s commentary on Sefer Yetzirah, chapter 2, mishnah 3; the Pardes, Shaar Mahus VeHanhagah, chapter 3; and the Ramak’s Shiur Komah, which lists them one by one.
Marei mekomos
- 1וכמ״ש בזהר ויצא הנ״ל מצה בקדמיתא · קנז, א.
- 2מצה בקדמיתא ולבתר מצוה. בתוספת וא״ו · Zohar, Vayetzei 23:200–225
- 3תר״ך עמודי אור · ראה פי׳ ר׳ משה בוטריל לספר יצירה פ״ב, מ״ג (לט, ד). פרדס שער מהות והנהגה פ״ג. ונמנו בפרטיות בספר שיעור קומה — להרמ״ק — סצ״ג (צא, א).
- 4
31וזהו שאמר בהגדה מצה זו שאנו אוכלים על שום מה פי׳ דבשלמא בהיותם בגלות מצרים שהיו בבחי׳ גלות הקליפות וסט״א [וסטרא אחרא] מאד
And this is what is said in the Haggadah: “This matzah that we eat, for what reason?” The meaning is: granted, when they were in the exile of Egypt, being very much in the state of exile of the kelipos and the sitra achra,
Now the Haggadah’s question, “This matzah that we eat, for what reason?”, can be read precisely. In Egypt, Israel was deep in the exile of the kelipos and the sitra achra, the forces opposed to holiness.
ולא היה להם תורה ומצות נצטוו באכילת מצה דקודם חצות שהיא בחי׳ מצת חסר וי״ו כדי להיות להם זו להכנה שעי״ז יוכלו לקבל אח״כ הגילוי גדול הנ״ל.
and they did not have Torah and mitzvos, they were commanded to eat the matzah of before midnight, which is the level of מצת lacking a vav, so that this would be a preparation for them, through which they could afterwards receive the great revelation mentioned above.
Lacking Torah and mitzvos, they were commanded to eat the matzah of before midnight, מצת without a vav, as a preparation through which they could afterwards receive the great revelation.
משא״כ אנו שכבר ניתן לנו התומ״צ [התורה ומצות], [והנה המצות הם מצות המלך123 ובקיומן מקיים שום תשים4 עליך מלך
But we, to whom the Torah and mitzvos have already been given [now, the mitzvos are the commands of the King, and by fulfilling them one fulfills “You shall surely set a king over yourself,”
But we already have the Torah and mitzvos. The bracketed note explains that the mitzvos are the King’s commands, and keeping them fulfills “You shall surely set a king over yourself” (Deuteronomy 17:15), the acceptance of G‑d as King.
והוא בחי׳ יראה תתאה5 עכ״פ [על כל פנים] כמ״ש בס׳ ש״ב [של בינונים] פמ״א [פרק מ״א / פרשה מ״א] וכמ״ש במ״א ע״פ וידבר אלקים6 כו׳ בדרוש חג השבועות] א״כ מהו ענין אכילת מצה זו דקודם חצות דוקא.
which is the level of lower awe at least, as is written in Sefer Shel Beinonim, chapter 41, and as is explained elsewhere on the verse “And G‑d spoke,” etc., in the discourse for the festival of Shavuos], if so, what is the point of eating this matzah specifically before midnight?
That acceptance is at least lower awe, as Sefer Shel Beinonim, that is, the Tanya, explains in chapter 41, and as the Shavuos discourse on “And G‑d spoke” explains. If we already have this lower awe, why do we still need a matzah specifically before midnight? That, the Alter Rebbe says, is the Haggadah’s question.
The paragraph reads the Haggadah’s question: in Egypt the first matzah was needed as a preparation, but we, who already have the lower awe that comes from keeping the King’s commands, seem not to need a matzah of before midnight.
Marei mekomos
- 1המצות הם מצות המלך · ראה תוספתא נגעים פ״ג, ז. בבא בתרא קנט, א גזירת המלך.
- 2מצות המלך · Tosefta Negaim 3:7
- 3מצות המלך · Bava Batra 159a:10–12
- 4שום תשים אליך מלך · Deuteronomy 17:15
- 5שום תשים עליך מלך והוא בחי׳ יראה תתאה · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 41:7
- 6וכמ״ש ע״פ וידבר אלקים · לקו״ת במדבר טז, ג.
32ומשני על שום שלא הספיק כו׳, פי׳ דאכילת מצה שלנו אע״פ [אף על פי] שאנו אוכלים אותה לפני חצות דוקא, מ״מ אין הענין וההמשכה רק מבחי׳ ומדרגת מצה הא׳ בלבד. אלא שנמשך בה ג״כ מבחי׳ ומדרגת המצה הב׳ שהיא בחי׳ הביטול ומורא גדול עד שלא הספיק להחמיץ
And it answers, “Because [the dough] did not have time,” etc. That is: our eating of matzah, although we eat it specifically before midnight, nevertheless its matter and its drawing-down are not only from the level and rung of the first matzah alone; rather, there is drawn into it also from the level and rung of the second matzah, which is the level of bittul and great awe, to the point that [the dough] did not have time to leaven.
The Haggadah answers, “Because the dough of our fathers did not have time to leaven.” Our matzah, though eaten before midnight, is not of the first matzah’s level alone: it also carries the second, the bittul and great awe so intense that dough could not leaven.
והוא מבחי׳ הגילוי שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים וגאלם שהוא גילוי אור א״ס ב״ה שלמעלה מעלה מהשתלשלות שגילוי והמשכה זו נמשך לנו במצה זו ג״כ מטעם הנ״ל,
And this is from the level of the revelation in which there was revealed to them the King of the kings of kings, and He redeemed them, which is the revelation of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, that is far above the chain of descent (hishtalshelus); and this revelation and drawing-down is drawn to us in this matzah too, for the reason mentioned above.
That second level comes from the revelation of the King of the kings of kings who redeemed them, the Infinite Light far above the worlds; and it reaches us in our matzah too, for the reason explained, the Torah and mitzvos of the whole year.
ואיך מרומזים ב׳ ההמשכות במצה א׳. אך נודע כי ההפרש בין חמץ למצה הוא רק באות ה׳.
And how are the two drawings-down alluded to in one matzah? Now, it is known that the difference between chametz (חמץ) and matzah (מצה) is only in the letter hei.
But how can one matzah hint at both levels? The answer begins from the known teaching that חמץ (chametz) and מצה (matzah) differ only in one letter: the hei (ה) of matzah in place of the ches (ח) of chametz.
The paragraph gives the Haggadah’s answer, that our matzah, eaten before midnight, carries both levels, and begins to show how both are hinted in the single letter that distinguishes matzah from chametz.
33והנה הה׳ מילוי שלה הוא ג״כ אות ה׳, ולכן נקראת המכפלה כמ״ש במ״א,1 וב׳ ההין אלו המרומזים בה׳ אחת דמצה הן בחי׳ ב׳ מדרגות דמצה הנ״ל,
Now, the filling (milui) of the hei, [when it is spelled out,] is also the letter hei, and therefore it is called “the doubled” (ha-machpelah), as is explained elsewhere; and these two heis that are alluded to in the one hei of matzah are the two levels of matzah mentioned above;
When the letter hei is spelled out as a word, its spelling (הה) is again a hei, which is why it is called “the doubled.” In Torah Ohr, Chayei Sarah, the Alter Rebbe ties this “doubling” to the Cave of Machpelah, “the double cave.” These two heis, hinted in the one hei of matzah, are the two levels of matzah.
כי המילוי הוא מבחי׳ ההעלם המוסתר ונעלם תוך הה׳ עצמה,
for the filling is of the level of the concealment that is hidden and concealed within the hei itself.
The added hei of the spelling stands for what is hidden within the hei itself.
והעלם זה שבתוך ה׳ שהיא בחי׳ מל׳ שרשו מבחי׳ כתר כי נעוץ תחלתן בסופן2 כו׳ ועמ״ש ע״פ ועתה יגדל נא כח אד׳3 כו׳ כח הוא ענין גילוי ההעלם כו׳ ע״ש:
And this concealment within the hei, which is the level of Malchus, has its root in the level of Keser, for “their beginning is wedged in their end,” etc. And see what is written on the verse “And now, let the power of Ado-nai be great,” etc.: “power” is the matter of the revelation of what is concealed, etc.; see there.
That hidden element within the hei, which is Malchus, is rooted in Keser, the highest level, by the principle of Sefer Yetzirah, “their beginning is wedged in their end”: the highest is embedded in the lowest. The text points to the discourse on “And now, let the power of Ado-nai be great” (Numbers 14:17), where “power” means the revealing of what is hidden.
The paragraph shows how one matzah holds both levels: the hei of matzah, spelled out, contains a second, hidden hei, the concealed root of Malchus in Keser, which is the higher matzah within the lower.
Ado-nai is the Name associated with Malchus (as the maamar later says, “to illuminate Malchus, the secret of Ado-nai”), so the verse asks that the power hidden within Malchus be revealed, just as the hidden hei within the hei is revealed.
Marei mekomos
- 1ולכן נקראת המכפלה כמ״ש במ״א · תו״א טו, ג. ראה סה״מ תקס״ה-א ע׳ טז.
- 2נעוץ תחלתן בסופן · Sefer Yetzirah 1:7
- 3ועתה יגדל נא כח אד׳ · Numbers 14:17
Sea and dry land ¶34–36
34ה ועתה צ״ל ענין שביעי של פסח ואיך דע״י ששת ימים תאכלו מצות תחלה אזי דוקא וביום השביעי עצרת שהוא ענין קי״ס [קריעת ים סוף] וכנ״ל.
5. Now we must understand the matter of the seventh [day] of Pesach, and how it is that through “six days you shall eat matzos” first, then specifically “and on the seventh day an Atzeres,” which is the matter of the Splitting of the Sea of Reeds, as mentioned above.
The fifth section turns to the seventh day of Pesach: how eating matzah for six days leads to the Atzeres of the seventh day, the day the sea split.
דהנה ענין ים ויבשה1 למעלה הן בחי׳ עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגלייא והוא עד״מ ים וארץ למטה
For the matter of sea and dry land above is the level of the concealed world (alma d’iskasya) and the revealed world (alma d’isgalya). It is like the sea and the land below.
In the supernal worlds, “sea” and “dry land” stand for the concealed world (alma d’iskasya) and the revealed world (alma d’isgalya), like sea and land in our world.
דכל מה שיש ביבשה יש בים,2 אלא שביבשה הם באתגלייא משא״כ בהים הם באתכסייא לפי שהן מובלעין ומכוסים בתוך הים שמכסה עליהם (וע׳ בפ׳ בשלח בד״ה אז ישיר).34
For everything that is on dry land is [also] in the sea, except that on dry land they are revealed, whereas in the sea they are concealed, for they are absorbed and covered within the sea, which covers over them (and see in Parshas Beshalach, in the discourse beginning “Then [Moshe] sang”).
The Talmud teaches (Chullin 127a) that whatever lives on dry land has its counterpart in the sea; on land the creatures are visible, in the sea they are hidden, absorbed and covered by the water. The text refers to its discourse “Then Moshe sang” in Torah Ohr, Beshalach.
וכמו כן למעלה הנה בחי׳ מלכות דאצי׳ נק׳ ארץ ונק׳ ג״כ ים.
And likewise above: the level of Malchus of Atzilus is called “earth” and is also called “sea.”
Likewise above, Malchus of Atzilus is called both “earth” and “sea.” As the Tzemach Tzedek puts it in Or HaTorah (Beshalach, p. 569, quoted in the Kehot note), Malchus as it receives from the ten Sefiros of Atzilus is “sea,” the concealed world, and as it descends to give life to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah it is “earth,” the revealed world.
והיינו כי הנה הארת והמשכת המלכות שנמשך ומתלבשת בבי״ע להחיות העולמות מאין ליש שהם בחי׳ עלמין דאתגליין שנראים דבר נפרד ויש בפני עצמו נק׳ בחי׳ זו ארץ, וע״ז נאמר תדשא הארץ5 כו׳ תוצא הארץ נפש חיה67 וכדפי׳ בזהר בכמה דוכתי ועי׳ [ועיין] בפ׳ שמיני דל״ט ע״ב.
That is, the radiance and the drawing-forth of Malchus that is drawn down and clothed in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, to give life to the worlds [and bring them] from nothing into something, which are the revealed worlds, which appear to be a separate thing, an entity of its own: this level is called “earth.” Of this it is said, “Let the earth sprout,” etc., “Let the earth bring forth living creatures,” as is explained in the Zohar in many places; and see in Parshas Shemini, folio 39b.
The radiance of Malchus that comes down into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah to bring the worlds from nothing into being is called “earth.” Those lower worlds are “revealed worlds”: each created thing appears as a separate existence of its own. This is why the verses of creation say “Let the earth sprout” and “Let the earth bring forth,” as the Zohar explains in several places, including Parshas Shemini (folio 39b).
והיינו כמ״ש באגרת הקודש ד״ה איהו וחיוהי8 שעיקר התהוות היש ודבר נפרד לגמרי הוא ממל׳ דאצי׳ שנעשה עתיק דבריאה כי אין מלך בלא עם910 כו׳11 משא״כ מבחי׳ המדות עצמן דאצי׳ ע״ש.
That is, as is written in Iggeres HaKodesh, in the section beginning “He and His life-forces,” that the main bringing-into-being of the yesh, a thing entirely separate, is from Malchus of Atzilus, which becomes the Atik of Beriah, for “there is no king without a people,” etc.; which is not so of the level of the middos of Atzilus themselves; see there.
The text cites Iggeres HaKodesh (“the Holy Epistle,” the fourth part of the Tanya), section 20: a truly separate existence comes into being mainly from Malchus of Atzilus, which becomes the Atik, the innermost root, of the World of Beriah, because “there is no king without a people,” subjects distinct from him. It does not come from the middos of Atzilus themselves.
The paragraph introduces the imagery of sea and dry land as the concealed and revealed worlds, and identifies Malchus of Atzilus as both: “sea” as it stays hidden in Atzilus, and “earth” as it comes down to create the separate beings of the lower worlds.
A king needs subjects who are distinct from him; so Malchus, G‑d’s sovereignty, is the attribute that gives created beings their sense of separate existence, while the middos of Atzilus themselves are one with G‑d and do not produce separate beings.
Marei mekomos
- 1מענין ים ויבשה · סה״מ תק״ע. אוה״ת בשלח ע׳ תקסט.
- 2דכל מה שיש ביבשה יש בים · Chullin 127a:12–14
- 3בד״ה אז ישיר · תו״א סב, ב.
- 4אז ישיר · Exodus 15:1
- 5תדשא הארץ · Genesis 1:11
- 6תוצא הארץ נפש חי׳ · Genesis 1:24
- 7תוצא הארץ נפש חיה · Zohar, Shmini 6:70–7:79
- 8באגה״ק ד״ה איהו וחיוהי · סי׳ כ דף קל, ב.
- 9אין מלך בלא עם · בחיי וישב לח, ל. וראה הנסמן במאמרי אדה״ז-פרשיות לע׳ תרלא.
- 10אין מלך בלא עם · Rabbeinu Bahya, Bereshit 38:30
- 11אין מלך בלא עם כו׳ · כ״ה גם בשרש מצות התפלה פרק כג. אבל באגה״ק נדפס: וכו׳.
35והנה המל׳ היא מקבלת האור והשפע מאור א״ס ע״י המדות דאצי׳ וממנה דוקא נמשך אח״כ בבי״ע,
Now, Malchus receives the light and the flow from the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) through the middos of Atzilus, and it is specifically from it that [the flow] is afterwards drawn into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah;
Malchus of Atzilus receives the light of the Infinite through the middos, the emotive Sefiros, of Atzilus, and only through Malchus does that light then reach Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.
כי בחי׳ אור א״ס כמו שמאיר בבחי׳ המדות עליונים דאצילות א״א שיבא בבחי׳ הגילוי תחלה בבי״ע,
for the Infinite Light, as it shines in the supernal middos of Atzilus, cannot come into revelation in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah at the outset,
The Infinite Light as it shines in the middos of Atzilus cannot be revealed directly in the lower worlds.
כי באצי׳ איהו וחיוהי וגרמוהי חד שהחסד דאצי׳ הוא בחי׳ א״ס ממש ואין ערוך כלל בחי׳ חסד דבריאה
for in Atzilus “He, His life-forces and His vessels are one,” so that the Chesed (kindness) of Atzilus is actually the level of the Infinite, and there is no comparison at all [with] the level of the Chesed of Beriah,
In Atzilus, in the words of the Tikkunei Zohar, “He, His life-forces and His vessels are one”: the Chesed of Atzilus is truly infinite, and there is no comparison between it and the Chesed of Beriah.
שהוא בחי׳ גבול מחנה מיכאל באהבה לקבל ההשפעה בהשתלשלות מבחי׳ חסד דאצי׳ שבלי גבול, וכמ״ש באגרת הק׳ בענין ואנכי עפר ואפר1 כו׳ ע״ש.
which is a level of limitation, the camp of Michael, [standing] with love to receive the flow, through the chain of descent (hishtalshelus), from the level of the Chesed of Atzilus, which is without limit; as is written in Iggeres HaKodesh on the matter of “and I am dust and ashes,” etc.; see there.
The Chesed of Beriah is limited: it is “the camp of Michael,” the angels who stand with love to receive the flow, step by step, from the boundless Chesed of Atzilus. The text refers to Iggeres HaKodesh 15, where the Alter Rebbe brings his teacher’s explanation of Avraham’s words “I am dust and ashes”: even Avraham’s great love bears no comparison at all with the supernal Chesed, in which the Infinite Light is clothed.
אם לא ע״י שמתעלם תחלה אור החסד זה בבחי׳ מלכות וממנה יורד אח״כ השפע בבי״ע
[It cannot,] unless this light of Chesed is first concealed in the level of Malchus, and from it the flow afterwards descends into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah;
So the light of Chesed must first be concealed in Malchus, and only from Malchus does the flow descend to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.
כי מדת מל׳ הוא רוממות והתנשאות כמ״ש והמתנשא מימות עולם2 ודרך כלל ההתנשאות הוא הסתלקות שלא ירד החיות עליהם כ״כ [כל כך],
for the attribute of Malchus is exaltedness and loftiness, as it is said, “and Who is exalted from the days of old,” and in general loftiness is a withdrawal, so that the life-force does not descend upon them so much;
Malchus is exaltedness: a king stands above his people, as the blessing before the morning Shema says, “Who is exalted from the days of old.” Exaltedness means withdrawal, so the life-force does not descend to the worlds so fully. In Likkutei Torah, Balak, the Alter Rebbe explains that kingship, unlike kindness and love, implies distance: one reigns only over those who are separate from oneself.
ולכן נק׳ בחי׳ מלכות3 ים4 להיות כמו שהים מכסה ומעלים מה שבתוכו כמ״כ [כמו כן] בחי׳ מלכות מעלמת ומכסה על בחי׳ מדות העליונים דאצי׳
and therefore the level of Malchus is called “sea,” since just as the sea covers and conceals what is within it, so too the level of Malchus conceals and covers the level of the supernal middos of Atzilus
That is why Malchus is called “sea”: as the sea covers what is in it, Malchus conceals the supernal middos of Atzilus.
(ועמ״ש מענין והים עליהם מלמעלה5 בפ׳ בלק ע״פ מי מנה6 עפר יעקב),7 ולכן נק׳ בחי׳ זו דמלכות עלמא דאתכסייא.
(and see what is written on the matter of “and the sea was over them, above” in Parshas Balak, on the verse “Who has counted the dust of Yaakov”); and therefore this level of Malchus is called the concealed world.
The text refers to its discourse in Parshas Balak on “and the sea was over them, above,” said of the great basin in Shlomo’s Temple that stood upon twelve oxen (I Kings 7:25). In this aspect Malchus is called the concealed world.
אמנם מה שמאיר ומתפשט ממנה לנבראים דבי״ע להיות עלמין דאתגליין הנה בחי׳ זו נק׳ ארץ.
But what shines and spreads forth from it to the created beings of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, so that they are revealed worlds: this level is called “earth.”
What shines out of Malchus to the creatures of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, so that they become revealed worlds, is called “earth.”
(וכ״ה בזהר בראשית די״ח ע״ב דב׳ בחי׳ אלו זהו ענין ב׳ פסוקים ראשונים דק״ש [דקריאת שמע] שמע ישראל ובשכמל״ו [וברוך שם כבוד מלכותו לעולם ועד]8 וע׳ בס׳ ש״ב [של בינונים] ח״ב [חלק ב׳] פ״ז [פרק ז׳]).
(And so it is in the Zohar, Bereishis, folio 18b, that these two levels are the matter of the first two verses of the Shema, “Hear, O Israel” and “Blessed be the Name of the glory of His kingdom forever and ever”; and see Sefer Shel Beinonim, Part II, chapter 7.)
The Zohar (1:18b) teaches that these two levels are the first two verses of the Shema: “Hear, O Israel… Havayah is One” is the higher unity, and “Blessed be the Name of the glory of His kingdom forever and ever” is the lower unity. Tanya, Part II, chapter 7, explains this.
והנה כ״ז [כל זה] הוא דוקא כשהאור וההשפעה נמשך בדרך וסדר ההשתלשלות מאצי׳ לבי״ע מבחי׳ ממלא שאז שייך בחי׳ ים ויבשה עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגלייא,
Now, all this is specifically when the light and the flow are drawn by way of, and in the order of, the chain of descent from Atzilus to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, from the level of the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin); for then the levels of sea and dry land, the concealed world and the revealed world, apply.
All this applies when the light flows step by step in the order of the chain of worlds, from Atzilus down, as memalei, the light that fills each world according to its capacity. Then there is a “sea” and “dry land,” a concealed world and a revealed world.
שכך היא הדרגת ההשתלשלות העולמות שא״א שיבא האור וההשפעה שבאצילות שהוא בבחי׳ א״ס להתגלות בבי״ע נבראים ובעלי גבול אם לא ע״י ההעלם בתחלה בחי׳ עלמא דאתכסיא
For such is the gradation of the chain of descending worlds, that it is impossible for the light and the flow that are in Atzilus, which is in the mode of the Infinite, to be revealed in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, [which are] created and limited beings, except through concealment first, the level of the concealed world,
The light of Atzilus is infinite and the lower worlds are created and limited, so it can be revealed in them only after first being concealed in the “concealed world.”
שהוא באמת נשאר בבחי׳ אתכסיא והעלם אלא רק הארה והמשכה לבד נמשך מזה להיות מקור השפע לבי״ע בחי׳ עלמא דאתגליא.
which in truth remains in concealment and hiddenness, and only a radiance and a drawing-forth alone is drawn from it, to be the source of the flow to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, the level of the revealed world.
That concealed world itself stays hidden; only a glimmer of it comes down to be the source of the flow to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, the revealed world.
אמנם בליל שביעי של פסח שהיה מאיר ומתגלה הארה גדולה ועצומה מלמעלה מסדר ההשתלשלות מבחי׳ א״ס ב״ה עצמו הסוכ״ע השוה ומשוה9 כו׳
But on the night of the seventh [day] of Pesach there shone and was revealed a great and intense radiance from above the order of the chain of descent, from the level of the Infinite One, blessed be He, Himself, the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), “Who is equal and makes equal,” etc.,
But on the night of the seventh day of Pesach, a great light shone from above the whole order of the worlds, from the Infinite One Himself, sovev kol almin, the light that encompasses all worlds, of Whom the High Holiday hymn says that He is “equal and makes equal” small and great.
שאצי׳ ועשייה שוין ממש לפניו וכחשכה כאורה10 ממש שבחי׳ ההעלם והגילוי שבסדר השתלשלות העולמות עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגלייא שוין ממש לפניו.
for Atzilus and Asiyah are truly equal before Him, and “darkness is like light,” truly, so that concealment and revelation in the order of the chain of the worlds, the concealed world and the revealed world, are truly equal before Him.
Before Him, Atzilus and Asiyah are equal, and “darkness is like light” (Psalms 139:12): concealment and revelation, the concealed world and the revealed world, are the same to Him.
כיון שבאמת אינו בגדר עלמין כלל לכן ע״י ירידה והמשכה מבחי׳ זו נמשך לשנות סדר ההשתלשלות לגמרי שבחינת עלמא דאתכסיא נעשה ממש בבחי׳ גילוי כמו עלמא דאתגלייא
Since in truth He is not within the category of worlds at all, therefore, through a descent and drawing-down from this level, [an effect] was drawn to change the order of the chain of descent entirely, so that the level of the concealed world actually became revealed, like the revealed world:
Because He transcends the category of worlds altogether, when His light came down it overturned the order of the worlds: the concealed world itself became revealed.
שכללות ההעלם עצמו בא לידי גילוי ולא דרך הארה והמשכה לבד (ועמ״ש בשה״ש [בשיר השירים] בפי׳ כי טובים דודיך מיין).11
the concealment itself, as a whole, came into revelation, and not by way of a radiance and drawing-forth alone (and see what is written in Shir HaShirim on the explanation of “For your love is better than wine”).
The concealment itself, as a whole, came into revelation, not merely a glimmer of it. The text refers to its explanation of “For your love is better than wine” in Likkutei Torah on Shir HaShirim.
וזהו ויולך ה׳ את הים12 ברוח קדים עזה וגו׳, פי׳ רוח קדים הוא המשכה מבחי׳ קדמונו של עולם דהיינו מבחי׳ א״ס ב״ה עצמו שאינו בגדר עלמין כלל.
And this is “And Havayah drove the sea with a strong east wind (ruach kadim),” etc. The meaning: the “east (kadim) wind” is a drawing-down from the level of the Primordial One of the world (Kadmono shel olam), that is, from the level of the Infinite One, blessed be He, Himself, Who is not within the category of worlds at all.
This is the meaning of Exodus 14:21, “And Havayah drove the sea with a strong east wind (kadim)”: kadim (קדים) recalls Kadmono (קדמונו) shel olam, the Primordial One of the world, the Infinite One Himself, Who is beyond all worlds.
ועל ידי גילוי והמשכה זו וישם את הים לחרבה, שבחי׳ עלמא דאתכסיא נעשה בחי׳ יבשה שהוא בחי׳ גילוי ממש למטה.1314
And through this revelation and drawing-down, “He made the sea into dry ground”: the level of the concealed world became the level of dry land, which is the level of actual revelation below.
Through this revelation “He made the sea into dry ground”: the concealed world became “dry land,” fully revealed below. This is the inner meaning of the Splitting of the Sea.
The paragraph explains why Malchus is both “sea” and “earth” within the ordinary order of the worlds, and how on the seventh night of Pesach a light from beyond all worlds, the “east wind” of the Primordial One, turned the concealed world into revealed “dry land”: the Splitting of the Sea.
The Kehot note quotes the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah on Beshalach: the level of Malchus of Atzilus that receives from the ten Sefiros of Atzilus is called “sea” and the concealed world, and the level that descends to give life to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah is called “earth” and the revealed world. Another note points to the entry for “sea” in the Pardes, in its gate on the Kabbalistic names.
Marei mekomos
- 1ואנכי עפר ואפר · Genesis 18:27
- 2והמתנשא מימות עולם · ברכת יוצר.
- 3בחי׳ מלכות דאצי׳ נק׳ ארץ ונק׳ ג״כ ים · ”והיינו שהבחי׳ מל׳ שבאצי׳ שמקבלת מע״ס דאצי׳ נק׳ ים ועלמא דאתכסי׳, והבחי׳ שיורדת להחיות בי״ע נק׳ ארץ ועלמא דאתגלייא” — אוה״ת בשלח ע׳ תקסט.
- 4ולכן נק׳ בחי׳ מלכות ים · ראה פרדס שער ערכי הכנויים בערכו.
- 5והים עליהם מלמעלה · I Kings 7:25
- 6ע״פ מי מנה · לקו״ת בלק סח, ג.
- 7מי מנה עפר יעקב · Numbers 23:10
- 8שמע ישראל ובשכמל״ו · Tanya, Sha’ar HaYichud 7:1
- 9השוה ומשוה · פיוט וכל מאמינים.
- 10וכחשכה כאורה · Psalms 139:12
- 11כי טובים דודיך מיין · Song of Songs 1:2
- 12ויולך ה׳ את הים · Exodus 14:21
- 13וכמ״ש באגה״ק בענין ואנכי עפר ואפר · סי׳ טו.
- 14
36וזהו ענין קריעת ים סוף דהיינו שבחי׳ מל׳ דאצילות שהיא מקבלת מים החכמה עילאה דאצילות והיא סוף עולם האצי׳ ובה מתעלמים האורות של האצילות,
And this is the matter of the Splitting of Yam Suf (the Sea of Reeds): the level of Malchus of Atzilus, which receives from the sea of the supernal Chochmah of Atzilus, is the end (sof) of the World of Atzilus, and in it the lights of Atzilus are concealed.
Here is the inner meaning of the Splitting of Yam Suf, plainly “the Sea of Reeds,” read here as “the sea of the end (sof).” Malchus of Atzilus receives from the “sea” of supernal Chochmah, and it is the end of the World of Atzilus, where the lights of Atzilus are hidden.
וע״כ נק׳ ים וע״י הגילוי מבחי׳ קדמונו של עולם שהי׳ [שהיה] מאיר אז בבחי׳ מל׳ נעשה העלם הים סוף לבחי׳ גילוי ויבשה ממש דהיינו שעצמיות אורות האצי׳ היו אז בבחי׳ הגילוי בבי״ע.
And therefore it is called “sea.” And through the revelation from the level of the Primordial One of the world (Kadmono shel olam), which then shone in the level of Malchus, the concealment of Yam Suf became actual revelation and dry land; that is, the very essence of the lights of Atzilus was then revealed in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.
That is why Malchus is called “sea,” the sea of the end. When the revelation of the Primordial One shone into Malchus, its concealment became revelation, “dry land”: the very essence of the lights of Atzilus was revealed in the lower worlds.
(ויובן זה יותר עפמ״ש [על פי מה שכתוב] בזהר בראשית הנ״ל דבחי׳ אחד ובחי׳ ועד שבק״ש [שבקריאת שמע]1 זהו ענין ים ויבשה, וכמ״ש יקוו המים אל מקום2 אחד3 כו׳ שהמל׳ דאצילות היא בחי׳ מקומו של אחד4 כביכול עי׳ [עיין] בת״ז [בתיקוני זהר] תיקון מ״ב.
(This will be understood better according to what is written in the Zohar, Bereishis, mentioned above, that the level of “One” (echad) and the level of “forever” (va’ed) in the Shema are the matter of sea and dry land; and as it is written, “Let the waters be gathered to one place,” etc., for Malchus of Atzilus is the level of the “place” of the One, as it were; see the Tikkunei Zohar, Tikkun 42.
A long parenthesis explains this through the Shema. The Zohar links the “One” of “Hear, O Israel” and the “forever” (va’ed) of “Blessed be the Name” with sea and dry land; and in “Let the waters be gathered to one place” (Genesis 1:9), Malchus is the “place” of the One, as the Tikkunei Zohar (Tikkun 42) explains.
וביאור הענין מובן עפמ״ש [על פי מה שכתוב] ע״פ וארא,5 שבאמת לגבי קב״ה [קודשא בריך הוא] מצד עצמותו ומהותו ית׳ לא שייך עליו מלת אחד כלל שהרי הוא יחיד ומיוחד והוא לבדו הוא, אלא כמארז״ל [כמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שהוא אחד בשבעה רקיעים ובארץ וד׳ רוחות העולם6 כו׳,
And the explanation of the matter is understood according to what is written on the verse “And I appeared” (Va’eira): that in truth, with respect to the Holy One, blessed be He, as He is in His essence and being, may He be blessed, the word “one” does not apply to Him at all, for He is singular (yachid) and unique and He alone is; but rather, as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, He is One in the seven heavens and the earth and the four directions of the world, etc.
Strictly, G‑d in His essence is not called “one,” a word that relates Him to something else, but “singular” (yachid), for He alone exists. “One” means that He is One in the seven heavens, the earth and the four directions, as the Kehot note shows from Berachos 13b and from the Alter Rebbe’s Shulchan Aruch, where the ches of אחד (eight) stands for the seven heavens and the earth.
ולכן א״ש [אתי שפיר] שבחי׳ זו נק׳ ים שהברואים שבים חיותם וקיומם הוא בתוך הים דוקא, וכך הוא בחי׳ עלמא דאתכסיא דאינון מתיחדין באחד שכולם בטלים במציאות במקורם כו׳, הנה מקום אתי7 כו׳,
And therefore it is well understood that this level is called “sea”: for the creatures in the sea have their life and existence specifically within the sea; and so is the level of the concealed world, in which they are united in the One, for they are all nullified in existence within their source, etc.: “Behold, there is a place with Me,” etc.
Malchus as “sea” is the concealed world: as sea creatures live only within the sea, the beings of the concealed world are united with the One and nullified within their source. That is “Behold, there is a place with Me” (Exodus 33:21), which the Midrash reads as G‑d being the place of the world: the “place” is still “with Me.”
ובחי׳ ועד הוא אחד בחלופי אתון8 שהוא מקור עלמין דאתגליין שנראה כאלו העולם הוא דבר ויש בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] כו׳.
And the level of va’ed (“forever”) is echad (“one”) with its letters exchanged; it is the source of the revealed worlds, where it seems as if the world is a thing and an entity of its own, etc.
Va’ed, “forever,” is the word echad with its letters exchanged, as the Zohar says (the alef and ches of אחד become the vav and ayin of ועד, letters that interchange, while the dalet stays): it is the source of the revealed worlds, where the world appears to be something in its own right.
והנה מהותו ועצמותו ית׳ הוא בחי׳ יחיד, ועיי״ש [ועיין שם] דע״י התורה נמשך בחי׳ יחיד ממש בבחי׳ גילוי וע״ז נאמר ושמי הוי׳ לא נודעתי9 כו׳.
Now, His being and essence, may He be blessed, is the level of yachid (singular); and see there, that through the Torah the level of yachid itself is drawn down into revelation, and of this it is said, “But by My Name Havayah I was not known,” etc.
G‑d’s own essence is yachid, singular, beyond even “One.” The discourse on Va’eira explains that through the Torah this very level is revealed, a revelation of which G‑d says that by the Name Havayah He was not known to the Patriarchs (Exodus 6:3).
That is for the reason written elsewhere, that the Torah is called “the parable of the Primordial One” (mashal hakadmoni), the level of the Primordial One of the world, etc.
The Torah reveals this level because it is “the parable of the Primordial One” (I Samuel 24:14), which Rashi explains as the parable of the Holy One, blessed be He, the Primordial One of the world.
והנה בקי״ס [בקריעת ים סוף] שנאמר ג״כ ויולך ה׳ את הים ברוח קדים13 כו׳ שהוא הגילוי מבחי׳ קדמונו של עולם שהוא יחיד ומיוחד והוא לבדו הוא לכן ע״י גילוי זה הפך ים ליבשה14 שבחי׳ אחד נמשך בבחי׳ גילוי ממש בבחי׳ ועד דהיינו גילוי יחו״ע [יחודא עילאה] ממש ביחו״ת [ביחודא תתאה],) (ועמ״ש ע״פ כי תשמע בקול15 כו׳ לעשות הישר16 כו׳ ע״ש).
Now, at the Splitting of the Sea, of which it is also said, “And Havayah drove the sea with an east wind (kadim),” etc., which is the revelation from the level of the Primordial One of the world, Who is singular and unique and He alone is, therefore through this revelation He turned the sea into dry land: the level of “One” was drawn into actual revelation in the level of “forever,” that is, the revelation of the higher unity (yichuda ila’ah) itself within the lower unity (yichuda tata’ah).) (And see what is written on the verse “If you will listen to the voice,” etc., “to do what is right,” etc.; see there.)
At the Sea too there was a revelation of the Primordial One, through the east wind (kadim), from Him Who is singular and unique. So that revelation “turned the sea into dry land” (Psalms 66:6): the level of “One,” the higher unity, was revealed within “forever,” the lower unity. The text also refers to Likkutei Torah, Re’eh, on “If you will listen to the voice of Havayah… to do what is right.”
ועד״ז הוא ענין אנשי יריחו17 שהיו כורכין את שמע שהיו אומרים אחד ואהבת ולא היו מפסיקין לומר בשכמל״ו [ברוך שם כבוד מלכותו לעולם ועד] כי רצו שיומשך האהבה מבחי׳ אחד יחו״ע [יחודא עילאה] ממש,
And along these lines is the matter of the people of Jericho, who would “bundle” the Shema: they would say “One” and “And you shall love” without interrupting to say “Blessed be the Name of the glory of His kingdom forever and ever,” for they wanted the love to be drawn from the level of “One,” the higher unity itself;
The people of Jericho “bundled” the Shema (Pesachim 55b): they went straight from “One” to “And you shall love” without saying “Blessed be the Name,” because they wanted their love to flow directly from the higher unity of “One.”
אלא שאין הלכה כדבריהם כי זהו רק בחי׳ קי״ס [קריעת ים סוף] שנמשך באתעדל״ע [באתערותא דלעילא] והזכרת קי״ס [קריעת ים סוף] הוא באמת ויציב18 שהוא אחר יציאת מצרים
except that the halachah is not according to them, for this is only the level of the Splitting of the Sea, which was drawn down through an arousal from above (isarusa dile’eila); and the mention of the Splitting of the Sea is in [the blessing] “True and firm” (Emes VeYatziv), which is after the Exodus from Egypt,
The halachah does not follow them, because that level belongs to the Splitting of the Sea, which came as an arousal from above. In the prayers, the Splitting of the Sea is mentioned only in the blessing “True and firm,” after the Exodus.
דהיינו לאחר שחותם בק״ש [בקריאת שמע] אני הוי׳ אלקיכם אשר הוצאתי אתכם מארץ מצרים19 כו׳ אזי דווקא מזכיר קי״ס [קריעת ים סוף] באמת ויציב:2021
that is, after one concludes the Shema with “I am Havayah your G‑d, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt,” etc.; only then does one mention the Splitting of the Sea, in “True and firm.”
Only after the Shema ends with “I am Havayah your G‑d, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt” (Numbers 15:41) do we mention the Splitting of the Sea, in “True and firm.” The revelation of the Sea has its place only after the Exodus.
The paragraph explains the Splitting of the Sea as the revelation of Malchus of Atzilus, the hidden “sea,” and connects it with the Shema: the higher unity of “One” was revealed within the lower unity of “forever,” a level that, as the halachah against the people of Jericho shows, belongs to an arousal from above.
The Kehot note records that the Tzemach Tzedek’s Yahel Or (p. 407) refers to this passage on “Let the waters be gathered to one place,” and it points to his Or HaTorah on Va’eira for “the parable of the Primordial One.”
Marei mekomos
- 1דבחי׳ אחד ובחי׳ ועד שבק״ש · Zohar, Bereshit 7:70–8:83
- 2יקוו המים אל מקום · Genesis 1:9
- 3יקוו המים אל מקום אחד · Tikkunei Zohar 81b:4–5
- 4יקוו המים . . מקומו של אחד · ביהל אור ע׳ תז מציין לכאן.
- 5וביאור . . עפמ״ש ע״פ וארא · תו״א נה, ב.
- 6אחד בשבעה רקיעים ובארץ וד׳ רוחות העולם · Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim 61:6
- 7הנה מקום אתי · Exodus 33:21
- 8ועד הוא אחד בחלופי אתוון · Zohar II, 134a
- 9ושמי ה׳ לא נודעת · Exodus 6:3
- 10משל הקדמוני · I Samuel 24:14
- 11משל הקדמוני בחי׳ קדמונו של עולם · Rashi on I Samuel 24:14
- 12משל הקדמוני בחי׳ קדמונו של עולם · Rashi on Exodus 21:16
- 13ויולך ה׳ את הים ברוח קדים · Exodus 14:21
- 14הפך ים ליבשה · Psalms 66:6
- 15כי תשמע בקול · לקו״ת ראה כג, ד.
- 16כי תשמע בקול כו׳ לעשות הישר · Deuteronomy 13:19
- 17אנשי יריחו היו כורכין את שמע · Pesachim 55b:15
- 18ע״פ — ועד״ז . . ויציב · ראה להלן בהוספות להערות וציונים.
- 19אני הוי׳ אלקיכם אשר הוצאתי אתכם מארץ מצרים · Numbers 15:41
- 20אחד בז״ר וארץ וד״ר · Berakhot 13b:13–14
- 21
An Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d ¶37–38
6. And this is [the meaning of] “Six days you shall eat matzos, and on the seventh day an Atzeres.”
The sixth section returns to the opening verse, “Six days you shall eat matzos, and on the seventh day an Atzeres.”
כי הנה קי״ס [קריעת ים סוף] הי׳ [היה] בשביעי של פסח דוקא כי ים סוף הוא בחי׳ מל׳ שהוא בחי׳ יום השביעי כנודע דיום הראשון הוא בחי׳ חסד.2
For the Splitting of the Sea of Reeds was specifically on the seventh [day] of Pesach, for Yam Suf is the level of Malchus, which is the level of the seventh day, as is known, for the first day is the level of Chesed.
The Splitting of the Sea happened specifically on the seventh day of Pesach, because Yam Suf is Malchus, and Malchus is the seventh of the emotive Sefiros, corresponding to the seventh day, just as the first day corresponds to Chesed, the first of them.
The paragraph ties the Splitting of the Sea to the seventh day of Pesach: the seven days correspond to the seven emotive Sefiros, and the seventh, Malchus, is the “sea.”
Marei mekomos
- 1ששת ימים תאכל מצות וביום השביעי עצרת · Deuteronomy 16:8
- 2דיום הראשון . . חסד · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 7:3
And the seventh day is the level of Malchus; and then the level of the “east wind” (ruach kadim) was drawn down and revealed, for “their end is wedged in their beginning”: “from the beginning, from of old (mi-kedem), she was anointed.”
The seventh day corresponds to Malchus, and on it the “east wind,” the revelation of the Primordial One, was drawn down and revealed. As Sefer Yetzirah says, “their end is wedged in their beginning,” and as the Friday-night hymn Lecha Dodi says of the Shabbos, which is Malchus, “from the beginning, from of old (mi-kedem), she was anointed”: the last level is rooted in the very first.
אך גילוי זה הוא דוקא ע״י שמתחלה ששת ימים תאכל מצות,
But this revelation comes specifically through first “six days you shall eat matzos.”
But this revelation on the seventh day comes only through the six days of eating matzah beforehand.
דהנה ענין אכילת מצה מבואר למעלה שהוא ג״כ ענין המשכת אור א״ס שלמעלה מסדר ההשתלשלות שזהו ענין הדילוג שלא הספיק להחמיץ עד שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים כו׳,
For the matter of eating matzah has been explained above: that it too is the matter of the drawing-down of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) that is above the order of the chain of descent (hishtalshelus), which is the matter of the “skipping,” that [the dough] “did not have time to leaven before there was revealed to them the King of the kings of kings,” etc.
Eating matzah, as explained above, also draws down a light from beyond the order of the worlds: it is the “skipping” of Pesach, for the dough “did not have time to leaven” because the King of the kings of kings was revealed.
ולכן ע״י אכילת מצה ששת ימים שהוא המשכת אור הסוכ״ע בבחי׳ גילוי בכל הששה מדות מבחי׳ חסד עד בחי׳ יסוד, אזי נמשך מזה וביום השביעי שהוא בחי׳ מל׳ עצרת כו׳
And therefore, through eating matzah six days, which is the drawing-down of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) in revelation into all six middos, from the level of Chesed to the level of Yesod, there follows from this “and on the seventh day,” which is the level of Malchus, “an Atzeres,” etc.
So eating matzah for six days draws the encompassing light, sovev kol almin, openly into all six emotive attributes, one for each day, from Chesed through Yesod; and this brings about the seventh day, Malchus, as an “Atzeres.”
דהיינו שבחי׳ היותה בחינת ים והעלם נעשה בחי׳ יבשה וגילוי.
That is, its being the level of sea and concealment becomes the level of dry land and revelation.
That is, Malchus, ordinarily the hidden “sea,” becomes revealed “dry land.”
(והיינו ע״י רוח קדים שהוא המשכה מבחינת קדמונו של עולם3 שאינו בגדר עלמין כלל אפילו להיות סובב כו׳, והוא אתעדל״ע [אתערותא דלעילא] שלמעלה מאתעדל״ת [מאתערותא דלתתא] שע״י מעשה המצות ולכן נאמר ואתם תחרישון,4
(That is, through the “east wind,” which is a drawing-down from the level of the Primordial One of the world (Kadmono shel olam), Who is not within the category of worlds at all, not even so as to be [called] “encompassing,” etc.; and it is an arousal from above that is above the arousal from below that comes through the performance of the mitzvos, and therefore it is said, “And you shall be silent.”
The bracketed passage adds that this came through the “east wind,” a revelation from the Primordial One, Who is beyond even the category of “encompassing” the worlds. It is an arousal from above, higher than anything our performance of the mitzvos can arouse; that is why Israel at the Sea was told, “And you shall be silent” (Exodus 14:14): the miracle came from above, not through their efforts.
אלא שאעפ״כ [שאף על פי כן] המשכה זו היא דוקא ע״י שמתחלה ששת ימים תאכל מצות שהוא אתעדל״ת [אתערותא דלתתא] להמשיך אתעדל״ע [אתערותא דלעילא] המשכה מבחי׳ סוכ״ע רצון העליון
Except that, even so, this drawing-down comes specifically through first “six days you shall eat matzos,” which is an arousal from below, to draw down an arousal from above, a drawing-down from the level of sovev kol almin, the supernal will;
Yet the six days of matzah are still needed as an arousal from below, to draw down the encompassing light, the supernal will.
אזי עי״ז ישרה ויומשך ההמשכה מלמעלה מבחי׳ סוכ״ע כמ״ש במ״א בענין פתחי לי56 כו׳ ואני אפתח לך כו׳ ועמ״ש בביאור ע״פ אחרי7 ה׳ אלקיכם תלכו8 ומ״ש סד״ה האזינו השמים910 בענין אהיה כטל11 כו׳).
then, through this, the drawing-down from above the level of sovev kol almin will rest [upon us] and be drawn down, as is explained elsewhere on the matter of “Open to Me,” etc., “and I will open to you,” etc.; and see what is written in the explanation on the verse “After Havayah your G‑d shall you walk,” and what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “Give ear, O heavens,” on the matter of “I will be like the dew,” etc.)
Once that is drawn down, the still higher light, above even sovev, rests upon them. The text refers to three discourses: on “Open to Me… and I will open to you,” where the Sages say, “Open for Me an opening like the eye of a needle, and I will open for you an opening like the entrance of the Hall,” a small opening from below drawing a vast one from above; on “After Havayah your G‑d shall you walk”; and on “Give ear, O heavens,” where “I will be like the dew” comes from a level that no arousal from below reaches.
וזהו עצרת להוי׳ אלקיך,12 כי הוי׳ זהו בחינת יחו״ע [יחודא עילאה] שנק׳ ים וכמ״ש הוי׳ אחד,13 ושם אלקים זהו בחי׳ מקור ההמשכה בבי״ע שנק׳ יבשה, ובשביעי של פסח הוא גילוי שלמעלה מב׳ הבחי׳ כנ״ל
And this is “an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d (Elokecha)”: for Havayah is the level of the higher unity (yichuda ila’ah), which is called “sea,” as it is written, “Havayah is One”; and the Name Elokim is the level of the source of the drawing-down into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, which is called “dry land.” And on the seventh [day] of Pesach there is a revelation that is above both levels, as mentioned above;
This explains “an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d (Elokecha)”: Havayah is the higher unity, the “sea” (“Havayah is One”), and Elokim is the source of the flow into the lower worlds, the “dry land.” The revelation of the seventh day of Pesach is above both.
ולכן הוא בחי׳ עצרת לב׳ הבחי׳ להוי׳ אלקיך, ואזי מה שהי׳ [שהיה] נק׳ הוי׳ שהוא בחי׳ ים ועלמא דאתכסיא נעשה אלהיך בבחי׳ אתגליא ממש,
and therefore it is an Atzeres for both levels, “to Havayah your G‑d.” And then what had been called Havayah, which is the level of sea and the concealed world, became “your G‑d” (Elokecha), in actual revelation.
Therefore the day is an Atzeres to both Names together, and Havayah, the hidden “sea,” became “your G‑d” (Elokecha), openly revealed.
(וזהו ענין עצרת קליטה וכיווץ שנתכווצו ונקרשו המים ונעשו כמו נד14 עד שנעשה בבחי׳ יבשה: מ״כ וצ״ע [וצריך עיון]).15
(And this is the meaning of atzeres: retention and contraction, for the waters contracted and congealed and became like a heap (ned), until it became dry land. I found this written, and it needs examination.)
A short note, marked as something found written that needs examination, explains the word atzeres as retention and contraction: the waters contracted and congealed “like a heap” (Exodus 15:8) until they became dry land. According to the Kehot note, a manuscript adds here, “and see what is written below.”
והנה הגם שבחשבון ספירת העומר הרי יום שביעי ש״פ הוא בחי׳ יסוד ולא בחי׳ מל׳ כנודע, היינו בבחי׳ חושבנא דעומר שהוא העלאה מלמטה למעלה, וע״י ההעלאה והאתעדל״ת [והאתערותא דלתתא] ממשיכים היום יום כו׳,
Now, although in the reckoning of the Counting of the Omer the seventh day of Pesach is the level of Yesod and not the level of Malchus, as is known, that is in the aspect of the count of the Omer (chushbena de-omer), which is an elevation from below to above; and through the elevation and the arousal from below one draws down “today is day,” etc.;
An objection: in the Counting of the Omer, the forty-nine days counted from Pesach to Shavuos, the seventh day of Pesach is the sixth day of the count, Yesod, not Malchus. The answer is that the Omer count is an ascent from below to above: through our counting of each day we draw down that day’s light.
וע״כ יום הראשון שהוא ענין הגילוי מלמעלה למטה מאיליו וממילא אין סופרים אותו ומתחילים מיום השני משא״כ לגבי בחי׳ ההמשכה שמלמעלה למטה שנמשך ביום א׳ של פסח,
and therefore the first day, which is the matter of the revelation from above to below, of itself and as a matter of course, is not counted, and one begins from the second day. This is not so with respect to the level of the drawing-down from above to below that is drawn on the first day of Pesach
That is why the first day of Pesach, when the revelation comes from above by itself, is not counted, and the count begins from the second day. But in terms of the revelation from above that came on the first day of Pesach, the order is different.
(שזהו עיקר בחי׳ חג הפסח לשון דילוג1617 שהיא אתעדל״ע [אתערותא דלעילא] ואילו ההמשכה שע״י חשבון ימי העומר עיקר ענינה הוא חג השבועות כו׳).
(which is the essence of the festival of Pesach, a term for skipping, which is an arousal from above; whereas the drawing-down through the counting of the days of the Omer has as its main point the festival of Shavuos, etc.).
The bracketed words explain that this revelation from above is the essence of Pesach, whose name means “skipping” (as Rashi explains on Exodus 12:11), while the drawing-down through the Omer count leads mainly to Shavuos.
הרי יום הא׳ דפסח הוא עיקר ההמשכה ראשונה והוא בבחי׳ החסד, ואזי יום שביעי של פסח הוא בחי׳ מל׳.
Thus the first day of Pesach is the main, first drawing-down, and it is in the level of Chesed; and then the seventh day of Pesach is the level of Malchus.
In that order, the first day of Pesach, the first drawing-down, is Chesed, and the seventh day of Pesach is Malchus.
אמנם בפסח מצרים לפי שהי׳ [שהיה] אצלם משה ואהרן וז׳ ענני הכבוד, ע״כ גם בלא אכילת מצה היו יכולים להמשיך מבחי׳ הגילוי שנגלה עליהם ביום א׳ להמשיכו בכל הז׳ ימים,
However, at the Pesach of Egypt, since Moshe and Aharon and the seven Clouds of Glory were with them, they were able, even without eating matzah, to draw down from the level of the revelation that was revealed to them on the first day, drawing it into all seven days.
At the Pesach of Egypt the Jews had Moshe, Aharon and the seven Clouds of Glory with them, so even without eating matzah they could draw the revelation of the first day into all seven days. In the maamar before this one (Likkutei Torah, Tzav 12b), the Alter Rebbe explains that Moshe and Aharon were both of the level of Abba, and the cloud of Aharon was the encompassing light of Abba, which blinds the external forces.
וע״כ לא הי׳ [היה] חימוצו נוהג רק יום הא׳ בלבד משא״כ עתה (וכמ״ש זה לעיל בד״ה מצה זו כו׳. ע״ש).
And therefore its [prohibition of] chametz applied only on the first day alone, which is not so now (as is written above, in the discourse beginning “This matzah,” etc.; see there).
That is why chametz was then forbidden only on the first day; now it is different. The text refers to the earlier maamar of this parsha, “This matzah,” which explains this.
ומעתה יובן ג״כ מש״כ [מה שכתוב] עצרת להוי׳ אלקיך ובשמיני עצרת נאמר תהיה לכם18 ולמה לא נאמר כאן לכם ג״כ.
And from here it will also be understood why it is written “an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d,” while of Shemini Atzeres it is said “shall be for you,” and why “for you” is not said here as well.
This also leads to the question raised at the beginning: why the seventh day of Pesach is “an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d” while Shemini Atzeres is “for you.”
ויובן זה בהקדים עוד ענין אחד והוא להבין הטעם שאין גומרים את ההלל בחג הפסח כ״א בב׳ ימים הראשונים19 ומאי שנא מחג הסוכות שגומרין את ההלל בכל ימי החג.
This will be understood by first introducing one more matter, namely, to understand the reason that the complete Hallel is not said on the festival of Pesach except on the first two days, and how it differs from the festival of Sukkos, on which the complete Hallel is said on all the days of the festival.
To explain it, the Alter Rebbe first asks another question: why is the complete Hallel said on Pesach only on the first two days, while on Sukkos it is said on every day of the festival?
The paragraph shows how the six days of matzah, drawing the encompassing light into the six emotive attributes, bring about the revelation in Malchus on the seventh day, an Atzeres to both Havayah and Elokim; it reconciles this with the Omer count and with the Pesach of Egypt, and turns to the question of Hallel.
On the Primordial One, the Kehot note points to the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah on Beshalach (p. 573); on the question of Hallel, to Or HaTorah, Vayikra, vol. 4, pp. 1–8, and on Bo, p. 263.
Marei mekomos
- 1נעוץ סופן בתחלתן · Sefer Yetzirah 1:7
- 2מראש ומקדם נסוכה · פיוט לכה דודי.
- 3מבחינת קדמונו של עולם · ראה אוה״ת בשלח ע׳ תקעג.
- 4ואתם תחרישון · Exodus 14:14
- 5כמ״ש במ״א בענין פתחי לי · לקמן שה״ש לה, ג.
- 6פתחי לי · Song of Songs 5:2
- 7בביאור ע״פ אחרי ה׳ אלקיכם תלכו · לקו״ת ראה כ, ד ואילך.
- 8אחרי ה׳ אלקיכם תלכו · Deuteronomy 13:5
- 9סד״ה האזינו השמים · לקו״ת האזינו עג, ד.
- 10
- 11אהיה כטל · Hosea 14:6
- 12עצרת להוי׳ אלקיך · Deuteronomy 16:8
- 13הוי׳ אחד · Deuteronomy 6:4
- 14כמו נד · Exodus 15:8
- 15מ״כ וצ״ע · בבוך 2031: ”מ״כ וצ״ע ועמ״ש לקמן בס״ד).
- 16הפסח לשון דילוג · ראה רש״י בא יב, יא. מאמרי אדה״ז-פרשיות ס״ע תקלד ובהנסמן לשם.
- 17לשון דילוג · Rashi on Exodus 12:11
- 18תהיה לכם · Numbers 29:35
- 19הטעם שאין גומרים את ההלל בחג הפסח כ״א בב׳ ימים הראשונים · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא-ד ע׳ א-ח. פ׳ בא ע׳ רסג.
Hallel, and “for you” ¶39–40
39ונודע מענין אמירת ההלל בחג הוא ענין רוב השמחה והשבח על תוספת האור והגילוי שמאיר ומתגלה מלמעלה.
Now, it is known regarding the saying of Hallel on a festival that it is a matter of abundant joy and praise for the added light and revelation that shines and is revealed from above.
Hallel on a festival expresses abundant joy and praise for the added light and revelation that shines from above on that day.
וגם פי׳ הלל הוא ענין המשכת האור והגילוי מלשון בהילו נרו,1 וכמ״ש במ״א דשני הענינים עולים בקנה א׳ שע״י ההלל והשבח ממשיכים ההארה והגילוי כו׳,
And also, the meaning of hallel is the drawing-down of light and revelation, from the expression “when His lamp shone (be-hilo).” And as is explained elsewhere, the two meanings go together, for through the hallel and praise one draws down the radiance and the revelation, etc.
Hallel (הלל) also means drawing down light, from “when His lamp shone (be-hilo, בהלו) over my head” (Job 29:3). The two meanings go together: as Torah Ohr, Vayeshev, explains, praising a person for his qualities brings them out of hiding into revelation, and so praise of G‑d draws down His light.
ונודע שעיקר ענין מצות קריאת ההלל הוא כשגומרים אותו דוקא שאז נק׳ מצוה ומברכין עליו תחלה לד״ה אשר קדשנו במצותיו כו׳ משא״כ כשקורין אותו בדילוג נק׳ רק מנהג אבותיהם בגמרא (בתענית כ״ח ב׳)
And it is known that the essence of the mitzvah of reading Hallel is specifically when it is completed, for then it is called a mitzvah, and according to all opinions one first recites over it the blessing “Who has sanctified us with His commandments,” etc.; whereas when it is read with skipping, it is called in the Gemara only “the custom of their fathers” (in Taanis, folio 28b),
The complete Hallel is the real mitzvah, over which, all agree, a blessing is said. The partial Hallel, said with passages skipped, is called in the Talmud (Taanis 28b) only “the custom of their fathers.”
וארז״ל [ואמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] (שם) הלל בר״ח [בראש חודש] לאו דאורייתא, וא״כ אינו מובן הטעם כלל למה אין גומרין את ההלל ביום שביעי של פסח עכ״פ [על כל פנים] שבו הי׳ [היה] הגילוי הגדול מלמעלה מהשתלשלות כו׳.
and our Sages, of blessed memory, said (there), “Hallel on Rosh Chodesh is not from the Torah.” If so, the reason is not understood at all why the complete Hallel is not said at least on the seventh day of Pesach, on which there was the great revelation from above the chain of descent (hishtalshelus), etc.
The Talmud there concludes that Hallel on Rosh Chodesh, the New Moon, is not an obligation from the Torah. So why is the complete Hallel not said at least on the seventh day of Pesach, the day of the great revelation from above the chain of worlds?
אך הענין הוא דהנה בצאת ישראל ממצרים היו עדיין בבחי׳ קטנות שהרי לא קיבלו עדיין תורה ומצות עד שעמדו אצל הר סיני, וע״כ נקראו בשם נער כמ״ש כי נער ישראל23 ואוהבהו4 (בהושע סי׳ י״א),
But the explanation is that when Israel went out of Egypt they were still at the level of smallness (katnus), for they had not yet received the Torah and mitzvos, not until they stood at Mount Sinai; and therefore they were called by the name “youth” (na’ar), as it is written, “When Israel was a youth, I loved him” (in Hosea, chapter 11);
The answer: when Israel left Egypt they were still in “smallness,” spiritually immature, since they had not yet received the Torah at Sinai. That is why the prophet calls Israel then a “youth”: “When Israel was a youth, I loved him” (Hosea 11:1).
ולכן אף שהיה להם אז התגלות נסים גדולים ועצומים שהוא ע״י ירידה הארה גדולה ועצומה מא״ס ב״ה הסוכ״ע, אמנם לא היה5 הארה זו מאיר ומתגלה בהם כ״א בתכלית הקטנות
and therefore, although they then had the revelation of great and mighty miracles, which comes through the descent of a great and intense radiance from the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), nevertheless this radiance did not shine and become revealed in them except in utmost smallness
So although they saw great miracles, which come from an intense light of the Infinite One, the light that encompasses all worlds, that light shone in them only in utmost smallness.
(וע׳ בפע״ח [בפרי עץ חיים] גבי כוונת6 שביעי של פסח שנז׳ [שנזכר] קטנות כו׳ ע״ש, דלכאורה תמוה איך הוא בחי׳ קטנות והלא אדרבה האור והגילוי נמשך מבחי׳ שלמעלה מסדר ההשתלשלות וכמ״ש בזהר בעתיקא תליא.
(and see the Pri Etz Chaim, on the kavanah of the seventh [day] of Pesach, where smallness is mentioned, etc.; see there. At first glance it is puzzling how it is a level of smallness, when, on the contrary, the light and revelation are drawn from a level above the order of the chain of descent, as is said in the Zohar, “it depends on Atika (the Ancient One).”
A parenthesis cites the Pri Etz Chaim, the Arizal’s teachings on the prayers and festivals, which speaks of “smallness” in the mystical intentions (kavanos) for the seventh day of Pesach (Shaar Chag HaMatzos, chapter 8, as the Kehot note locates it). This seems puzzling, for the light of that day came from above the order of the worlds, and the Zohar says of it, “it depends on Atika,” the highest level.
ולפי הנ״ל א״ש [אתי שפיר] דבאמת הגילוי הוא מבחי׳ גבוה מאד אבל הגילוי להם הוא בבחי׳ קטנות מטעם הנ״ל שהרי לא קיבלו עדיין תומ״צ [תורה ומצות] ולא היה בהן עדיין שלימות כמ״ש בזהר)
But according to the above it is well understood: in truth the revelation is from a very high level, but the revelation to them was in a mode of smallness, for the reason mentioned above, since they had not yet received the Torah and mitzvos and there was not yet completeness in them, as is said in the Zohar).
The answer is that the revelation was indeed very high, but it was received in a state of smallness, because they did not yet have the Torah and mitzvos and were not yet complete, as the Zohar says.
(And see in the Gemara, chapter 8 of Bava Kamma, folio 92, end of side b, “When I was small,” etc.
Another parenthesis gathers sources on Israel’s “youth” at the Exodus. The Talmud (Bava Kamma 92b) explains the saying “When we were small, [we were treated as] men; now that we are old, as children” from the verses: at first G‑d Himself went before Israel in the pillars of cloud and fire, and later He sent an angel.
ועיין מענין כי נער ישראל ברבות כי תשא ס״פ מ״ג ובשה״ש [ובשיר השירים]9 רבה10 בפסוק אפריון עשה לו1112 ובזח״ב [ובזהר חלק ב׳] ס״פ בא דמ״ג ע״א.13 ויקהל דרי״ז סע״א [סוף עמוד א]. ובמק״מ [ובמקדש מלך] שם.14 ועמ״ש בביאור ע״פ שימני כחותם1516 בענין הרצועות דתש״ר [דתפילין של ראש]).
And see on the matter of “When Israel was a youth” in the Midrash Rabbah, Ki Sisa, end of section 43, and in Shir HaShirim Rabbah on the verse “A palanquin he made for himself,” and in the Zohar, Part II, end of Parshas Bo, folio 43a; Vayakhel, folio 217, end of side a; and in the Mikdash Melech there. And see what is written in the explanation on the verse “Set me as a seal,” on the matter of the straps of the tefillin of the head.)
It also cites the Midrash on Ki Sisa, where Moshe pleads after the Golden Calf that Israel, just out of Egypt, are still “youths,” like a young vineyard whose wine has soured; Shir HaShirim Rabbah, where a king speaks openly with his young daughter but, once she is grown, only from within a canopy; the Zohar, which calls this youth “little Israel,” and the Mikdash Melech, a commentary on the Zohar; and the discourse on “Set me as a seal,” about the straps of the head tefillin.
והוא עד״מ מאהבת האב לבנו שיש בזה ב׳ אופנים, דהיינו כשהבן הוא קטן אז האהבה מהאב אליו היא בבחי׳ הגילוי ותוקף במאד עד שמחבקו ומנשקו ונושאו על זרועותיו.
And this is by way of analogy to a father’s love for his son, in which there are two modes. When the son is small, the father’s love for him is revealed and very intense, so much that he hugs him, kisses him and carries him in his arms.
An analogy: a father’s love for a small child is open and intense; he hugs him, kisses him and carries him in his arms.
אמנם עכ״ז [עם כל זה] אין האהבה מתגלה כ״כ [כל כך] בהבן הקטן רק בדברים קטנים, שהרי אינו מבין ומרגיש עדיין כ״כ [כל כך] הדברים הגדולים.
Nevertheless, the love is not revealed so much in the small son, except in small things, for he does not yet understand and feel the great things so much.
But that love can show itself in the child only in small things, since the child cannot yet understand or feel great things.
משא״כ כשהבן גדול דהגם שאז האהבה מהאב אינו נראה ונגלה כ״כ [כל כך] להיות מחבקו ומנשקו עכ״ז [עם כל זה] מתפשטת ומתגלית לבנו יותר ללמדו חכמה וליתן לו כל צרכיו אז בגדלותו שהם דברים גדולים כו׳.
Whereas when the son is grown, although the father’s love is then not seen and revealed so much, in hugging and kissing him, nevertheless it extends and is revealed to his son more, in teaching him wisdom and giving him all his needs then, in his maturity, which are great things, etc.
When the son is grown, the father no longer shows his love with hugs and kisses, yet his love reaches the son more fully: he teaches him wisdom and provides all his needs, which are great things.
The paragraph explains why the complete Hallel is not said on the seventh day of Pesach: though the revelation then was very high, Israel had not yet received the Torah and could receive it only as a small child receives a father’s love.
The Kehot notes draw on the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah on Beshalach, which discusses this at length, quoting the Zohar: “‘When Israel was a youth’ is little Israel (Yisrael zuta); ‘Hear, O Israel’ is elder Israel (Yisrael saba),” and the Mikdash Melech, that Z’eir Anpin is called little Israel.
Marei mekomos
- 1בהילו נרו · Job 29:3
- 2כי נער ישראל · Shemot Rabbah 43:9
- 3כי נער ישראל · Zohar, Bo 15:225–17:236
- 4כי נער ישראל ואוהבהו · Hosea 11:1
- 5
- 6ועי׳ בפע״ח גבי כוונת שש״פ · שער חהמ״צ פ״ח.
- 7ועיין בגמרא פ״ח דב״ק דף צ״ב סע״ב · נתבאר בארוכה באוה״ת בשלח ע׳ שפב.
- 8כד הוינא זוטרי · Bava Kamma 92b:17
- 9ברבות כי תשא ס״פ מ״ג . . ובשה״ש · נזכר באוה״ת שם. נזכר גם באוה״ת נ״ך-א ע׳ תמג.
- 10ובשה״ש רבה · ג, ט.
- 11
- 12אפריון עשה לו · Song of Songs 3:9
- 13ובזח״ב ס״פ בא דמ״ג ע״א · ”כי נער ישראל ואוהבהו ישראל זוטא, שמע ישראל ישראל סבא” — אוה״ת בשלח שם. ובאוה״ת נ״ך ע׳ שפה.
- 14ויקהל דרי״ז סע״א ובמק״מ שם · ”שז״א נק׳ ישראל זוטא” — אוה״ת בשלח שם.
- 15ע״פ שימני כחותם · וראה לקו״ת שה״ש מו, ד.
- 16שימני כחותם · Song of Songs 8:6
40וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] למעלה עד״מ הנה ביצ״מ [ביציאת מצרים] שנאמר כי נער ישראל שעדיין לא הי׳ [היה] בהם שלימות כ״כ [כל כך], לכן אע״פ [אף על פי] שהגילוי הי׳ [היה] אהבה רבה ממקום גבוה מאד. אמנם לא האיר בהם רק בבחי׳ קטנות, וע״כ אין גומרין בו את ההלל.
So too above, by way of analogy: at the Exodus from Egypt, of which it is said, “When Israel was a youth,” for there was not yet so much completeness in them, therefore, although the revelation was a great love from a very high place, nevertheless it shone in them only in a mode of smallness; and therefore the complete Hallel is not said on it.
The same is true above. At the Exodus Israel was a “youth,” not yet complete; so although the revelation they received was a great love from a very high place, it shone in them only in a mode of smallness, and therefore the complete Hallel is not said on the seventh day of Pesach.
(והא דבימים ראשונים של פסח גומרים את ההלל מבואר בזהר שם וגם ע״פ פשוט הוא נכון כי אע״ג [אף על גב] שלא הי׳ [היה] בהם עדיין שלימות כ״כ [כל כך] מ״מ הרי יציאתם מבחינת מצרים שהיא מאפילה לאורה ברוחניות ג״כ
(As for the complete Hallel being said on the first days of Pesach, it is explained in the Zohar there; and also according to the plain sense it is right, for although there was not yet so much completeness in them, nevertheless their going out of the state of Egypt was from darkness to light in a spiritual sense as well:
A parenthesis explains why the complete Hallel is nevertheless said on the first days of Pesach. The Zohar gives a reason, and the plain sense gives another: even though they were not yet complete, leaving Egypt was a passage from darkness to light in the spiritual sense too.
from the level of Egypt, “the nakedness of the land,” and the forty-nine gates of impurity, they went out to be servants of G‑d.
They left Egypt, called “the nakedness of the land” (Genesis 42:9), and the forty-nine gates of impurity, to become servants of G‑d.
א״כ אין לך דבר גדול מזה אף שלא נשלמו עדיין עד קבלת התורה וע״ז גומרין את ההלל ביום צאתם ממצרים),
If so, there is nothing greater than this, even though they were not yet made complete until the receiving of the Torah; and for this the complete Hallel is said on the day of their going out of Egypt.)
Nothing is greater than that, even before the Torah was received, and so the complete Hallel is said on the day they left Egypt.
משא״כ בחג הסוכות שהוא אחר קבלת התורה שבחי׳ אהבה העליונה מאיר ומתפשט בהם בבחי׳ גדלות עד״מ אהבת האב לבנו הגדול שמתגלית ונמשך ממנה דברים גדולים כו׳ כנ״ל, ע״כ גומרין בהן את ההלל בכל ימי החג.
Whereas on the festival of Sukkos, which is after the receiving of the Torah, when the supernal love shines and spreads in them in a mode of maturity (gadlus), like a father’s love for his grown son, which is revealed and from which great things are drawn, etc., as mentioned above, therefore the complete Hallel is said on them on all the days of the festival.
Sukkos is different: it comes after the receiving of the Torah, when the supernal love shines in Israel in a mode of maturity, like a father’s love for his grown son, which brings great things. Therefore the complete Hallel is said on every day of Sukkos.
ובהקדמה זו מובן ג״כ הטעם שבשמע״צ [שבשמיני עצרת] נאמר עצרת תהיה לכם3 שמאיר ומתגלה לכם ממש משא״כ בשביעי של פסח נאמר עצרת לה׳ אלקיך4 שאינו מאיר ומתגלה בבחי׳ לכם כ״ כ עד קבלת התורה,
And with this introduction the reason is also understood that of Shemini Atzeres it is said, “an Atzeres shall be for you”: it shines and is revealed to you yourselves; whereas of the seventh [day] of Pesach it is said, “an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d,” for it does not shine and become revealed in the mode of “for you” so much, until the receiving of the Torah.
This answers the question about the two Atzeres verses: on Shemini Atzeres the light shines and is revealed “for you,” in Israel itself, while on the seventh day of Pesach, before the Torah was received, it is “to Havayah your G‑d,” not yet revealed “for you.”
(ולכן נקרא שבועות עצרת בגמרא, ואמרו בו הכל מודים בעצרת דבעינן לכם כו׳.
(And therefore Shavuos is called Atzeres in the Gemara, and they said of it, “All agree that on Atzeres we require ‘for you’ [as well],” etc.
That is why the Talmud calls Shavuos “Atzeres” and rules that on it all agree “for you” is required as well, rejoicing with food and drink and not only prayer (Pesachim 68b).
ועיין ברבות בשה״ש [בשיר השירים] בפסוק מה יפו פעמיך5 אמר ר׳ [רבי] יהושע בן לוי ראויה היתה העצרת של חג שתהא רחוקה חמשים יום כנגד העצרת של פסח6 אלא כו׳ ע״ש, הרי דחג השבועות הוא לגבי שבעת ימי הפסח דוגמת שמיני עצרת לגבי שבעת ימי הסוכות.
And see the Midrash Rabbah on Shir HaShirim, on the verse “How beautiful are your steps”: Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said, “The Atzeres of the Festival ought to have been fifty days away, corresponding to the Atzeres of Pesach; but,” etc.; see there. Thus the festival of Shavuos is, in relation to the seven days of Pesach, like Shemini Atzeres in relation to the seven days of Sukkos.
And the Midrash on “How beautiful are your steps” says that the Atzeres of Sukkos ought to have come fifty days later, like the Atzeres of Pesach. So Shavuos is to the seven days of Pesach what Shemini Atzeres is to the seven days of Sukkos: the “Atzeres” that completes them.
והיינו כנ״ל שבפסח לא נמשך הגילוי כ״כ [כל כך] בבחי׳ לכם עד חג השבועות שניתנה בו תורה, והנה בענין הלל פי׳ הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] פ׳ אמור דצ״ו תחלת ע״א שכן ההלל סודו להאיר במל׳ סוד אדני גימטריא הלל7 כו׳. ולכן לא נאמר הלל גמור עד חג השבועות עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו].
That is, as mentioned above, that on Pesach the revelation is not drawn so much in the mode of “for you” until the festival of Shavuos, on which the Torah was given. Now, regarding Hallel, the Ramaz explains (on Parshas Emor, folio 96, beginning of side a): “For indeed, the secret of Hallel is to illuminate Malchus, the secret of Ado-nai, which equals hallel in numerical value,” etc.; “and therefore the complete Hallel was not said until the festival of Shavuos.” End of quote.
On Pesach the revelation does not reach Israel “for you” until Shavuos, the day the Torah was given. The Ramaz, the Kabbalist Rabbi Moshe Zacuto, writes that the inner purpose of Hallel is to illuminate Malchus, the Name Ado-nai (אדני), whose numerical value, 65, equals that of hallel (הלל); therefore, he says, the complete Hallel was not said until Shavuos.
וענין להאיר בשם אד׳ י״ל [יש לומר] שיובן ממ״ש בד״ה ועתה יגדל נא8 כח אד׳9 שזהו כענין העונה איש״ר [אמן יהא שמיה רבא]10 מברך בכל כחו כו׳ ע״ש.
And the matter of illuminating the Name Ado-nai can be understood from what is written in the discourse beginning “And now, let the power of Ado-nai be great,” that this is like “one who answers ‘Amen, yehei shmei rabba mevarach’ with all his strength,” etc.; see there.
Illuminating the Name Ado-nai is explained in the discourse “And now, let the power of Ado-nai be great” (found, the Kehot note says, in the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah on Sh’lach): it is like answering “Amen, yehei shmei rabba” with all one’s strength (Shabbos 119b).
ובספר מאורי אור אות ה׳ סי׳ י״ד כתב הלל נק׳ המלכות כי היא מהלל תמיד להוי׳, ויש הלל גמור מל׳ פרצוף שלם ויש הלל שאינו גמור חצי פרצוף מחזה ולתתא עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו].
And in the book Me’orei Or, letter hei, section 14, he wrote: “Hallel is a name for Malchus, for she praises Havayah constantly. There is a complete Hallel: Malchus as a complete partzuf; and there is a Hallel that is not complete: half a partzuf, from the chest downward.” End of quote.
The Kabbalistic work Me’orei Or calls Malchus “Hallel,” for she constantly praises Havayah: complete Hallel is Malchus as a complete partzuf (configuration), incomplete Hallel only half of one, from the chest down.
והפרש זה הוא כענין מעלת בית ראשון על בית שני11 כמבואר בזח״ב [בזהר חלק ב׳] שמות ד״ט ע״ב12 ובמק״מ [ובמקדש מלך] שם ע״ש שזהו כענין ה׳ עילאה וה׳ תתאה,
And this difference is like the superiority of the First Temple over the Second Temple, as is explained in the Zohar, Part II, Shemos, folio 9b, and in the Mikdash Melech there (see there), that this is like the upper hei and the lower hei.
This difference resembles the superiority of the First Temple over the Second, which the Zohar (2:9b) and the Mikdash Melech compare to the upper hei and the lower hei of the Name Havayah.
ועד״ז כ׳ [כתב] בפרדס בעה״כ [בערכי הכינויים] ערך הלל. הלל גמור ושאינו גמור13 יש שפי׳ כי הגמור הוא בסוד הבינה ושאינו גמור בסוד המל׳. והנכון הלל גמור לבנה במילואה והלל שאינו גמור בסוד פרצת הלבנה עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו],
And along these lines he wrote in the Pardes, in Erchei HaKinuyim, under the entry hallel: “Complete Hallel and incomplete: there are those who explain that the complete is in the secret of Binah, and the incomplete in the secret of Malchus. But the correct [view] is: complete Hallel is the moon in its fullness, and incomplete Hallel is in the secret of the breach of the moon.” End of quote.
The Pardes of Rabbi Moshe Cordovero writes along the same lines in its lexicon of Kabbalistic names (Erchei HaKinuyim), under hallel: one view holds that complete Hallel corresponds to Binah and incomplete Hallel to Malchus, but the view he prefers is that complete Hallel is the full moon and incomplete Hallel the diminished moon.
ולפמ״ש [ולפי מה שכתוב] בשם המק״מ [המקדש מלך] שני הפירושים עולים בקנה א׳ דהלל גמור זהו כשהמל׳ מקבלת הארה גדולה עד שהיא במדרגת הבינה כענין לא זז מחבבה עד שקראה אמי כו׳)
And according to what is written in the name of the Mikdash Melech, the two explanations go together: complete Hallel is when Malchus receives a great radiance, until it is at the rung of Binah, as in “He did not cease cherishing her until He called her ‘My mother,’” etc.)
Following the Mikdash Melech, the two views agree: complete Hallel is when Malchus receives so great a light that it reaches the level of Binah, as the Midrash says, “He did not cease cherishing her until He called her ‘My mother’”: the “daughter” is raised to be called “mother,” Imma, which is Binah.
(ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה שיר השירים בענין ב׳ הפירושים שבבחי׳ כלה לשון כלה שארי14 ולשון כלתה נפשי15 כו׳. ועמ״ש סד״ה יגלה לן טעמיה בענין ביום ההוא יהיה כו׳):1617
(And see what is written on this in the discourse beginning “Song of Songs,” on the matter of the two meanings in the level of kallah (bride): the sense of “my flesh is consumed (kalah)” and the sense of “my soul longs (kalsah),” etc. And see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “May He reveal to us its reasons,” on the matter of “On that day it will be,” etc.)
The text closes by pointing to two discourses: “Song of Songs,” on the two meanings of kallah, “consumed” (Psalms 73:26) and “longing” (Psalms 84:3); and “May He reveal to us its reasons” (Torah Ohr, Chayei Sarah, the discourse on the doubled hei cited above), at whose end, on “On that day it will be,” the Alter Rebbe says that in the time to come the upper hei itself will be revealed below.
The paragraph completes the answer: because Israel at the Exodus was still a “youth,” the revelation of the seventh day of Pesach was not received “for you,” so it is an Atzeres “to Havayah your G‑d” and the complete Hallel is not said; on Sukkos, after the Torah, the love is revealed in maturity, so Shemini Atzeres is “for you” and the Hallel is complete. Kabbalistic sources explain complete Hallel as the full illumination of Malchus.
The Kehot notes add that the forty-nine gates of impurity are spoken of in the Zohar Chadash on Yisro, and that the discourse “And now, let the power of Ado-nai be great” is found in the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah on Sh’lach.
Marei mekomos
- 1ערות הארץ · Genesis 42:9
- 2ומ״ט שערי טומאה · ראה זהר חדש יתרו לא, א.
- 3עצרת תהיה לכם · Numbers 29:35
- 4עצרת לה׳ אלקיך · Deuteronomy 16:8
- 5מה יפו פעמיך · Song of Songs 7:2
- 6ראויה היתה העצרת של חג שתהא רחוקה חמשים יום כנגד העצרת של פסח · Shir HaShirim Rabbah 7:2:2
- 7ההלל סודו להאיר במל׳ סוד אדני גימטריא הלל · Mikdash Melekh, RaMaZ Commentary on Zohar
- 8בד״ה ועתה יגדל נא · אוה״ת שלח תק, ב ואילך.
- 9ועתה יגדל נא כח אד׳ · Numbers 14:17
- 10העונה איש״ר בכל כחו · Shabbat 119b:5
- 11מעלת בית ראשון על בית שני · Zohar, Shemot 13:139–150
- 12כמבואר בזח״ב שמות ד״ט ע״ב · ראה אוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ע׳ קל.
- 13הלל גמור ושאינו גמור · ראה גם אוה״ת נח סו, א.
- 14כלה שארי · Psalms 73:26
- 15כלתה נפשי · Psalms 84:3
- 16שבועות נק׳ עצרת בגמ׳ ואמרו בו · Pesachim 68b:10
- 17עי׳ רבות שה״ש · ז, ד.
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
Each Rosh Chodesh the names of those learning here are brought to the Ohel. Add your name, and mark what you learn so it is counted.
In one’s avodah
Eating for the sake of Heaven gives a person strength that, in the Shema and prayer, makes his contemplation, love and awe stronger than his G‑dly soul could reach alone. The matzah of before midnight is the service of setting aside one’s will, lowliness and simple faith, which must be guarded from the chametz of self-exaltation; this arousal from below, together with Torah and mitzvos all year, is what makes a person a vessel for the higher revelation.
Questions for discussion
- Why does the Torah speak of six days of matzah before the Atzeres of the seventh day, when it commands matzah for seven, and how does the maamar read the verse?
- What distinguishes the matzah spelled מצת from the matzah spelled מצות, and why does only the first need guarding?
- How can food, from a lower order of creation, give life and even intellect to a human being?
- In what way is the child’s call of “Father” after tasting grain a model for the faith that matzah brings?
- Why is the seventh day of Pesach “an Atzeres to Havayah your G‑d” without the complete Hallel, while Shemini Atzeres is “for you” and Sukkos has the complete Hallel every day?
Key terms in this maamar
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×9
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×13
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d. ×6
- The intellect (mochin)מוחין
- Chochmah, Binah and Daas as a whole. ×2
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×9
- Daas (knowledge)דעת
- Deep connection to an idea, bridging intellect and emotion. ×15
- The Sefirosספירות
- The ten divine attributes through which G‑d relates to creation.
- The animal soulנפש הבהמית
- The soul that animates the body and its drives.
- The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
- The soul that is 'a part of G‑d above'. ×2
- Love and aweאהבה ויראה
- The two 'wings' of divine service.
- Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
- The forces of concealment that oppose holiness. ×1
- Willרצון
- Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect. ×4
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×15
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d. ×11
- The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
- G‑d's presence as it dwells in the world. ×4
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence.
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- Kingship: the level through which G‑d's word creates and rules the worlds. ×9
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence. ×2
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of the angels and emotions.
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one.
- An arousal from aboveאתערותא דלעילא
- Divine initiative, unprompted by us.
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×2
- The sitra achra (the other side)סטרא אחרא
- The realm opposed to holiness.
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving. ×8
- The light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin)ממלא כל עלמין
- Divine light that enters each world and gives it life according to its measure.
- The light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin)סובב כל עלמין
- Divine light too great to enter the worlds; it 'surrounds' them and affects them from beyond.
- The higher unity (yichuda ila'ah)יחודא עילאה
- The world is nothing next to G‑d.
- The lower unity (yichuda tata'ah)יחודא תתאה
- G‑d is present within the world's existence.
- Yesod (foundation)יסוד
- The channel that connects and transmits. ×2
- An arousal from belowאתערותא דלתתא
- Human initiative that draws down a divine response.
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- G‑d as concealed within nature, measuring and limiting. ×2
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×2