Likkutei Torah · Parshas Nasso · Maamar 7
זאת חנוכת המזבח ביום המשח אתו מאת נשיאי…
“This is the dedication of the altar on the day it was anointed”
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
Offerings and prayer raise up the animal soul: through contemplation its own desire, rooted in the angels of the Chariot, is stirred into a fiery love that surpasses the G‑dly soul’s natural love. Every such new beginning first needs an encompassing “glory,” as the princes’ incense and precious vessels came on the day of the anointing, before the altar’s regular “eating.”
The maamar in brief
The Torah says the princes’ dedication was both “on the day” the altar was anointed and “after” it. To explain, the maamar asks what offerings are: the altar’s “bread,” consumed by fire from above, in the form of a lion, which answered the fire brought from below. Prayer, which takes the place of the offerings, raises the animal soul: Pesukei deZimra and the blessings of the Shema, contemplating G‑d’s greatness and His love for Israel, turn its very craving into love of G‑d at the Shema. That is why the evil inclination is “very good”: subdued and transformed, it brings the greatest glory, like light out of darkness. The animal soul can do this because it is rooted in the “man” within the Ofanim and Chayos, who storm at the Seraphim’s “holy,” a revelation beyond their grasp; their tumult calls forth a response from the “man” on the Throne. The altar’s eating is an inner level; incense is encompassing. A beginning needs an encompassing extra, as “Render unto Havayah glory” precedes the seven voices. So the princes’ incense and vessels came on the day of the anointing, and their animal offerings after it.
Outline
- The question: “on the day” or “after”?One verse dates the princes’ dedication to the day of the anointing, another to after it. To answer, the maamar turns to the offerings as the altar’s “bread” and “eating,” consumed by a heavenly fire in the form of a lion.¶1–2
- Prayer in place of the offeringsPrayer raises the animal soul: a cry from the heart, a love that wants to shed every garment not devoted to G‑d, and the order of Pesukei deZimra and the blessings of the Shema, which show that G‑d remains alone and that His Name rests on Israel, until its desire becomes love of G‑d at the Shema.¶3–7
- Why the transformed evil is “very good”The angel of death, the evil inclination, is “very good” when subdued, for then G‑d’s glory rises highest, like light out of darkness. The penitent’s fiery love is gold beside the natural love’s silver, kindled by the furnace of prayer’s praises.¶8–10
- The root of the animal soul and the tumult of the OfanimThe human animal soul comes from the “man” within the Chayos and Ofanim. Hearing the Seraphim’s threefold “holy,” a revelation beyond their grasp, they storm, while the Seraphim, at its source, are still; that tumult below draws a response from the “man” on the Throne.¶11–12
- Two fires, and two kinds of offeringFire from below draws down fire from above, in the Temple, in prayer, and in Michael’s offering of the souls. The altar’s “eating” is an inner level, while the incense, a fragrance the soul enjoys and the body does not, is encompassing; the inner and outer altars match the inner and outer heart.¶13–14
- Chinuch: the extra gift of a beginningThe princes’ incense on the outer altar was a one-time initiation, chanukah as chinuch, like the gift given to a child beginning to learn. So too “Render unto Havayah glory” precedes the seven voices, and honor precedes the union of groom and bride; the princes’ precious vessels were that glory.¶15–17
- The anointing oil and the answerThe anointing oil, a drink mixed with fragrance, joins inner and encompassing, so the encompassing offerings belong to the day of anointing and the eating offerings come after it. This also explains the Midrash that every prince is credited with offering on the first day and on the last.¶18–19
Key concepts
- the animal soulנפש הבהמית
- The soul that animates the body and its drives. In a person it is an intelligent soul, rooted in the “man” within the Chayos of the Chariot, and so it can be stirred to a love of G‑d stronger than the G‑dly soul’s natural love.
- the eating of the altarאכילת מזבח
- The consuming of the offerings on the altar by the fire from above, the “lion that eats the offerings.” It is an inner level, like food taken inside, and in prayer it is the raising up of the animal soul.
- encompassing (makif)מקיף
- A light too great to be absorbed inwardly, which affects from above. The incense, whose fragrance the soul enjoys and not the body, is the encompassing offering, and every new beginning needs such an extra light first.
- tumultרעש
- The storm of the Ofanim and Chayos when they sense a revelation beyond their grasp. Its counterpart in the soul is the fiery love of the animal soul, “with greater strength.”
- kadosh and kodeshקדוש / קדש
- Kodesh is G‑d’s essential holiness, beyond all relation to the worlds; kadosh, with a vav, is what is drawn down from it. The three times “holy” are three stages of descent until the worlds can come into being.
- chinuch (initiation)חינוך
- The dedication (chanukah) of the altar understood as initiation: the extra gift that starts something new, after which the regular order suffices.
- gloryכבוד
- An additional, encompassing illumination drawn down before a new descent or union, as in “Render unto Havayah glory” before the seven voices, and the princes’ vessels made “for glory and for splendor.”
- subduing the sitra achraאתכפיא סטרא אחרא
- Overcoming and transforming the evil inclination, through which “the glory of the Holy One, blessed be He, is exalted above”; this is why it is called “very good.”
The question: “on the day” or “after”? ¶1–2
“This is the dedication of the altar on the day it was anointed, from the princes of Israel,” etc.; and it is written, “This is the dedication of the altar after it was anointed.”
The maamar opens with two verses from the Torah’s summary of the princes’ offerings at the dedication of the altar in the desert Sanctuary (Numbers 7:84 and 7:88). The first says the dedication was “on the day it was anointed”; the second, a few verses later, says it was “after it was anointed.”
ויש להבין מ״ש בתחלה ביום המשח אותו דמשמע שהחנוכה של הנשיאים ומשיחת המזבח נעשה בפעם א׳ ושהם ענין א׳ דהא בהא תליא שהחנוכה עם המשיחה הם מישך שייך אהדדי.
Now we need to understand what is said first, “on the day it was anointed,” which implies that the dedication of the princes and the anointing of the altar were done at one time, and that they are one matter, this depending on that, so that the dedication and the anointing are bound up with one another.
The first wording suggests that the princes’ dedication and the anointing of the altar happened at one time and form a single matter, each bound up with the other. This sets up the question the maamar will answer.
The maamar begins with an apparent contradiction in the Torah’s account of the altar’s dedication: “on the day it was anointed” as against “after it was anointed.”
The answer comes at the end of the maamar (paragraphs 18–19): the encompassing offerings, the incense and the princes’ vessels, belong with the anointing itself and so are “on the day it was anointed,” while the offerings that are the altar’s “eating” came “after it was anointed.” The Midrash (Bamidbar Rabbah 14:13) already reads the two phrases together: the princes offered on the very day of the anointing, but after the anointing itself.
Marei mekomos
- 1זאת חנוכת המזבח · הג״ה באוה״ת במדבר ע׳ רפט. ובכרך ד א׳תסב. (הגהות וקיצורים ביאור — שם ע׳ א׳תסו). לד״ה זה ראה ד״ה זאת חנוכת המזבח תר״מ. בגוכי״ק אדהצ״צ בהגה״ה על לקו״ת ברכה צז, א (בוך 1135 טז, א) נזכר: ”לכה דודי — זאת חנוכת מלאזני”. ואולי קאי על מאמר זה (וראה להלן בהוספות ברשימת הכתבי-יד).
- 2
- 3זאת חנוכת המזבח אחרי המשח אותו · Numbers 7:88
- 4זאת חנוכח המזבח ביום . . אחרי · Numbers 7:84
2ואח״כ כתיב אחרי המשח אותו דמשמע שהמשיחה היא ענין בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] והיתה צריכה להיות קודם החנוכה שהחנוכה של קרבנות הנשיאים לא היו רשאים להביא אלא אחר משיחת המזבח.
And afterwards it is written, “after it was anointed,” which implies that the anointing is a matter by itself and had to take place before the dedication, since they were not permitted to bring the dedication of the princes’ offerings except after the anointing of the altar.
The second verse, “after it was anointed,” implies that the anointing was a separate act that had to come first. The princes were not allowed to bring their dedication offerings until the altar had been anointed.
אבל אין ענין החנוכה של הנשיאים עם קרבנותיהם שייך כלל לענין משיחת המזבח שזה ענין בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] וזה ענין בפ״ע [בפני עצמו].
But the matter of the dedication of the princes with their offerings is not connected at all with the matter of the anointing of the altar: this is a matter by itself, and that is a matter by itself.
On this reading the princes’ dedication has nothing to do with the anointing: each is a matter in its own right. The maamar must show how both verses are true.
אך להבין זה צריך להבין תחלה ענין הקרבנות בכללם מה ענינם כי הנה הקרבנות נק׳ בשם לחם כמ״ש את קרבני לחמי1 לאשי וארז״ל [ואמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] בשתי אכילות הכתוב מדבר2 אכילת אדם ואכילת מזבח.
But to understand this, we must first understand the matter of the offerings in general: what they are. For the offerings are called by the name “bread,” as it is written, “My offering, My bread for My fire-offerings”; and our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “Scripture speaks of two eatings, the eating of man and the eating of the altar.”
Before answering, the Alter Rebbe explains what offerings are. The Torah calls them G‑d’s “bread” (Numbers 28:2), and the Sages, expounding the verse “if it be eaten at all,” say that Scripture speaks of two kinds of eating: the eating of man and the eating of the altar (Zevachim 13b).
אכילת מזבח היא שהיו מקריבים חלב ודם ע״ג [על גבי] המזבח והיה יורד אש מלמעלה3 כדמות אריה ותאכל את העולה4 ואת חלבי השלמים וזהו אריה דאכיל קרבנין56 הנז׳ [הנזכר] בזהר.7
The eating of the altar is that they would offer fat and blood upon the altar, and fire would come down from above in the form of a lion and consume the burnt offering and the fats of the peace offerings; and this is the “lion that eats the offerings” mentioned in the Zohar.
The altar’s “eating” was the burning of the fat and blood: fire came down from heaven in the form of a lion and consumed the offerings, as when the fire first descended at the Sanctuary’s inauguration (Leviticus 9:24). The Zohar calls this heavenly fire the “lion that eats the offerings.”
The paragraph sharpens the question and turns to its groundwork: the offerings as the altar’s “bread” and its “eating.”
The Talmud (Yoma 21b) lists among the wonders of the altar fire that it crouched like a lion, and also teaches that although fire came down from heaven, it was a mitzvah to bring ordinary fire as well. The maamar builds on both points in paragraph 13, where the fire from below draws down the fire from above.
Marei mekomos
- 1את קרבני לחמי · Numbers 28:2
- 2בשתי אכילות הכתוב מדבר · Zevachim 13b:3
- 3והי׳ יורד אש מלמעלה · Yoma 21b
- 4ותאכל את העולה · Leviticus 9:24
- 5אריה דאכיל קרבנין · Zohar, Introduction 12:92–104
- 6אריה דאכיל קרבנין · Zohar, Vayikra 40:278–41:285
- 7ארי׳ דאכיל קורבנין הנז׳ בזהר · ח״א ו, ב. ח״ב רעח, ‘א. ח״ג יז, א. לג, א.
Prayer in place of the offerings ¶3–7
3ויובן זה מענין התפלה שהיא כנגד הקרבנות1 ובהכרח שצ״ל בתפלה ג״כ מעין בחי׳ הקרבנות ודוגמתם שלכן תיקנוה כנגד הקרבנות
This will be understood from the matter of prayer, which corresponds to the offerings. Necessarily, then, there must also be in prayer something akin to the level of the offerings and their likeness, for that is why they instituted it to correspond to the offerings;
The point will be clarified through prayer, which the Sages instituted to correspond to the daily offerings (Berakhot 26b). If prayer was set up in their place, it must contain something of what the offerings were.
והיינו משום העלאת נפש הבהמית בתפלה שעיקרה בעבודה שבלב להפוך לבו מן הקצה אל הקצה ממה שהיה שקוע וטרוד כל היום במחשבות אדם ותחבולותיו2 ויצרי מעללי איש.
that is, because of the raising up of the animal soul in prayer, whose essence is in the service of the heart: to turn his heart from one extreme to the other, from having been immersed and occupied all day long in the thoughts of man and his schemes, and the inclinations of a man’s deeds;
What prayer shares with the offerings is the raising up of the animal soul, the soul that animates the body and its drives. Prayer is “service of the heart” (Taanit 2a): turning the heart around completely, away from the whole day’s absorption in human thoughts and schemes, a phrase taken from the Rosh Hashanah Musaf prayer.
איש איש כפי שיודע נגעי לבבו לצעוק אל ה׳ בצר לו בכל לב ונפש וכמ״ש צעק לבם3 וגו׳
each man according to what he knows of the afflictions of his own heart, to cry out to G‑d in his distress with all heart and soul, as it is written, “Their heart cried out,” etc.;
Each person, knowing the afflictions of his own heart, cries out to G‑d from his distress with all his heart and soul. The words echo Shlomo’s prayer at the dedication of the Temple (I Kings 8:38) and the verse “Their heart cried out” (Lamentations 2:18).
ולעורר את האהבה לה׳ בתשוקה וצמאון לדבקה בו ית׳ עד שתחפץ להתפשט מלבושים צואים4 הן הן המחשבות והדבורים והמעשים אשר לא לה׳ המה.
and to arouse love for G‑d, with longing and thirst to cleave to Him, may He be blessed, until [the soul] desires to strip itself of the filthy garments. These are the very thoughts, words and deeds that are not for G‑d,
The second movement of prayer is to awaken love and thirst for G‑d, until the soul wants to strip off its “filthy garments,” the image of Zechariah 3:4. These garments are the thoughts, words and deeds that are not devoted to G‑d; in Tanya, chapter 9, the Alter Rebbe cites Etz Chaim that once these garments, the pleasures of this world, are removed, the evil inclination itself becomes wholly good.
הן בהיתר כו׳ שהן מלבושי נוגה שלפעמים עולה ונכללת בקדושה כאשר יפלס5 האדם מעגלי דרכיו6 שלא יהנה מהעוה״ז רק לש״ש [לשם שמים] להרחיב לבו ודעתו לה׳ ולתורתו כו׳ כמ״ש במ״א,
whether in permitted things, etc., which are garments of nogah; and [nogah] at times ascends and becomes included in holiness, when a person weighs the paths of his ways so that he derives benefit from this world only for the sake of Heaven, to broaden his heart and mind for G‑d and His Torah, etc., as is explained elsewhere.
This includes even permitted things, which are “garments of nogah”: nogah (literally “glow”) is the intermediate kelipah, neither wholly holy nor wholly impure. Nogah can be lifted into holiness when a person weighs his ways and uses this world only for the sake of Heaven, to broaden his heart and mind for G‑d and His Torah.
משא״כ כשנמשך האדם אחר גופו לצורך עצמו ולהנאת עצמו מכוין אזי הוא יורד ונמשך למטה ומן ההיתר יסיתנו כו׳.789
Whereas when a person is drawn after his body, intending his own needs and his own pleasure, then he goes down and is drawn below, and from the permitted it will entice him, etc.
But when a person follows his body for his own needs and pleasure, he sinks down with it. The “etc.” completes the familiar saying: from the permitted, the inclination leads him on to the forbidden.
Prayer is presented as the inner counterpart of the offerings: in it the animal soul is raised up, by crying out to G‑d and by a love that wants to shed every garment not devoted to Him.
The “filthy garments” image comes, through Etz Chaim (Sha’ar 50, chapter 3), into Tanya, chapter 9, where the evil inclination itself becomes wholly good once its garments, the pleasures of this world, are removed. Here it is applied to permitted things, which belong to nogah and can either rise into holiness or sink into the impure kelipos.
Marei mekomos
- 1התפלה שהיא כנגד הקרבנות · Berakhot 26b:5–6
- 2מחשבות אדם ותחבולותיו · תפלת מוסף דר״ה.
- 3צעק לבם · Lamentations 2:18
- 4מלבושים צואים · Zechariah 3:4
- 5יפלס · Proverbs 4:26
- 6יפלס אדם מעגלי דרכיו · Proverbs 4:25
- 7בחפלה שעיקרה עבודה שבלב · Taanit 2a:11
- 8
- 9
4וזהו ענין בחי׳ הנוגה כשהיא יורדת ונכללת למטה בקליפות הטמאות לגמרי ועד״ז ניתקן ענין התפלה.
And this is the matter of the level of nogah when it descends and is included below in the utterly impure kelipos (husks). And along these lines the matter of prayer was arranged.
This is how nogah falls: used for selfish pleasure, it descends and is absorbed into the wholly impure kelipos. The order of prayer was arranged along the same lines as the offerings, to raise the animal soul step by step.
ומתחלה יסדר אדם1 שבחו של מקום בפסוקי דזמרה בגדולת ורוממות א״ס ב״ה לעורר התשוקה והצמאון בנפש הבהמית לאסתכלא ביקרא דמלכא2 בסידור שבחיו איך שהוא ברוך שאמר והיה העולם
First a person should set out the praise of the Omnipresent in Pesukei deZimra (the Verses of Praise), on the greatness and exaltedness of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, to arouse longing and thirst in the animal soul to gaze upon the glory of the King, through setting out His praises: how He is blessed, “Who spoke, and the world came into being,”
The first step is Pesukei deZimra, the verses of praise that open the morning prayer, following the Talmud’s teaching that one should first set out G‑d’s praise and then pray (Avodah Zarah 7b). Its purpose is to awaken a longing in the animal soul itself “to gaze upon the glory of the King,” beginning with Baruch She’amar, which blesses G‑d “Who spoke, and the world came into being.”
דהיינו באמירה אחת ובמאמר א׳ כו׳, וכמ״ש בזהר3 במחשבה א׳ ברא את העולם4 שהוא צופה ומביט עד סוף5 כל הדורות וקורא הדורות מראש6 וכולם נסקרים בסקירה אחת כו׳,
that is, with one saying and with one utterance, etc.; and as is written in the Zohar, “With one thought He created the world,” for He looks and gazes to the end of all the generations, and “calls the generations from the beginning,” and they are all surveyed in a single glance, etc.;
The world could have been created “with one utterance,” as the Mishnah says (Avos 5:1), and the Zohar says G‑d created it with one thought; in Likkutei Torah, Eikev, the Alter Rebbe pairs these same two teachings. In a single glance He sees all the generations to the end of time, as the Rosh Hashanah liturgy says and as Yeshayahu says He “calls the generations from the beginning” (Isaiah 41:4).
והוא יחיד חי העולמים מלך78 פי׳ יחיד שהוא לבדו הוא כמו קודם שנברא העולם וכמ״ש אתה הוא עד שלא9 נברא כו׳
and He is “the Only One, the Life of the worlds, King.” The meaning of “the Only One” is that He is alone, as [He was] before the world was created, as it is said, “You are He before [the world] was created,” etc.;
Baruch She’amar describes G‑d as “the Only One, the Life of the worlds, King.” “Only One” means that He remains alone exactly as before creation, as the morning prayer says, “You are He before the world was created.”
וכמ״ש אני ה׳ לא שניתי10 שאף לאחר שנברא העולם אין עוד מלבדו11 ואתה הוא12 ה׳ לבדך כמו קודם שנברא העולם
and as it is written, “I, Havayah, have not changed”: that even after the world was created, “there is nothing else besides Him,” “and You are He, Havayah, alone,” as before the world was created.
Malachi’s “I, Havayah, have not changed” means that creation brought no change in Him. Even now “there is nothing else besides Him” (Deuteronomy 4:35), and “You are He, Havayah, alone” (Nehemiah 9:6), just as before the world was created.
כי העולם אין תופס מקום כלל דכולא כלא ממש13 חשיבי לגביה.
For the world takes up no place at all, since everything is considered truly as nothing in relation to Him.
Creation takes up no “place” before Him, since everything is as nothing in relation to Him, as the Zohar says. That is why He is still alone, as before creation.
לפי שאתה עשית את השמים ושמי כו׳ ואתה מחיה14 את כולם כו׳
Because “You made the heavens, and the heavens of…,” etc., “and You give life to them all,” etc.
The reason is in the words that follow in the same verse of Nehemiah: He made the heavens and gives life to them all, so their whole existence comes from Him.
וחי העולמים אינו אלא בבחי׳ מלך שאין זה אלא לפי שנקרא שמו ומלכותו על המדינה כו׳ כמ״ש במ״א.
And [His being] “the Life of the worlds” is only at the level of “King,” which is only because His Name and His sovereignty are proclaimed over the realm, etc., as is explained elsewhere.
His title “the Life of the worlds” belongs only to His being “King.” A king is king only because his name and rule are proclaimed over a country; so too, G‑d’s giving life to the worlds belongs to His “Name” and sovereignty, not to His essence, as the next paragraph explains.
משובח ומפואר עדי עד פי׳ למעלה עד אין קץ ולמטה עד אין תכלית בעילוי אחר עילוי עד אין קץ ותכלית
“Praised and glorified forever and ever (adei ad)”: that is, above, to no end, and below, to no limit, in ascent after ascent without end or limit,
The maamar reads the doubled “adei ad” (“forever and ever”) as praise without limit in both directions: above with no end and below with no limit, rising level after level.
כמ״ש הכל ירוממוך סלה15 וכל החיים יודוך סלה16 וקדושים בכל יום יהללוך סלה פי׳ סלה בלי הפסק17 עד רום המעלות.18
as it is written, “All shall exalt You, selah,” “and all the living shall thank You, selah,” “and holy ones shall praise You every day, selah.” The meaning of “selah” is: without interruption, up to the very height of the levels.
The three phrases come from the prayers: “All shall exalt You, selah” from the blessing of Yotzer on Shabbos morning, and the other two from the Amidah, as the Kehot notes say. The Talmud teaches that “selah” means without interruption (Eruvin 54a), so this praise rises without pause to the very highest levels.
The order of prayer begins: the praises of Pesukei deZimra show that G‑d remains alone as before creation, and that giving life to the worlds is only His “Name” and kingship, while His praise rises without end.
The maamar reads the liturgy closely: “Only One” as G‑d’s unchanged solitude, “Life of the worlds” as subordinate to “King,” and “selah” as the unbroken ascent of praise. This prepares the contrast drawn next between His essence and the mere radiance of His Name.
Marei mekomos
- 1מתחלה יסדר אדם · Avodah Zarah 7b:18
- 2לאסתכלא ביקרא דמלכא · Zohar I, 38a
- 3וכמ״ש בזהר במח׳ א׳ · ח״ב כ, א. על״ק עקב (טז, ד). וש״נ.
- 4במחשבה א׳ ברא את העולם · Zohar, Shemot 49:354–50:364
- 5צופה ומביט עד סוף · תפלת מוסף דר״ה.
- 6קורא הדורות מראש · Isaiah 41:4
- 7יחיד חי העולמים מלך · ברכת ברוך שאמר.
- 8יחיד חי העולמים מלך · Siddur Ashkenaz, Weekday, Shacharit, Pesukei Dezimra, Barukh She'amar 2
- 9אתה הוא עד שלא נבה״ע · תפלת שחרית. ראה של״ה ג, ב.
- 10אני ה׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
- 11אין עוד מלבדו · Deuteronomy 4:35
- 12אתה הוא ה׳ לבדך · Nehemiah 9:6
- 13דכולא כלא ממש קמי׳ חשיבי · Zohar I, 11b
- 14אתה עשית . . ואתה מחי׳ · Nehemiah 9:6
- 15הכל ירוממוך סלה · ברכת יוצר דשבת.
- 16וכל החיים יודוך סלה · נוסח תפלת שמו״ע.
- 17סלה בלי הפסק · Eruvin 54a:12–13
- 18וקדושים בכ״י יהללוך סלה · שם.
5ונודע כמה מיני עליות בג״ע [בגן עדן] תחתון ועליון ונו״ן אלפים יובלות1 ושמיטין כו׳ שהרבה מיני עילויים מעילויים שונים
And it is known how many kinds of ascents there are in the lower and the higher Gan Eden, and the fifty thousand jubilees and sabbatical cycles, etc.: there are many kinds of elevations, of differing elevations.
The souls in the lower and higher Gan Eden rise through many kinds of ascent, and the tradition speaks of ascents through “fifty thousand jubilees” and sabbatical cycles; for this the Kehot note points to the Shach on the Torah, Parshas Behar, the parsha of the sabbatical year and the jubilee. All these are elevations of many different kinds.
והכל נמשך רק מבחי׳ שמו הגדול בחי׳ שמו ומלכותו שאין זה רק בחי׳ זיו והארה בלבד כו׳
And all of it is drawn only from the level of His great Name, the level of His Name and His sovereignty, which is no more than a level of radiance and illumination alone, etc.
All of them come only from His “great Name,” His Name and sovereignty, which is only a radiance and glow and not His essence. Even the loftiest spiritual ascents take place within this radiance.
וכי נשגב שמו2 שאפי׳ [שאפילו] שמו הוא בבחי׳ לבדו רק הודו וזיוו של שמו על ארץ ושמים כו׳.
And “for His Name is exalted”: that even His Name is at the level of “alone”; only the splendor and radiance of His Name is “upon earth and heaven,” etc.
The verse says, “His Name alone is exalted; His splendor is upon earth and heaven” (Psalms 148:13). Read closely, even His Name is “alone,” exalted beyond the worlds; what reaches earth and heaven is only the splendor and radiance of the Name.
All the spiritual worlds and their endless ascents derive only from the radiance of G‑d’s Name, and even that Name remains exalted above them.
For the “fifty thousand jubilees,” the Kehot note refers to the Shach on Parshas Behar.
Marei mekomos
- 1ונו״ן אלפים יובלות · ראה ש״ך פ׳ בהר ס, ד.
- 2כי נשגב שמו . . וירם קרן · Psalms 148:13
6ואי לזאת תכלה ותכסוף אליו ית׳ נפש כל חי לדבקה בו ית׳ ובפרט בהזכירו כי נקרא שמו הגדול ומלכותו ית׳ עלינו ישראל בפרט וכמ״ש וירם קרן לעמו1 מגיד דבריו ליעקב23 כו׳
And therefore the soul of every living being will pine and long for Him, may He be blessed, to cleave to Him, may He be blessed; and especially when he recalls that His great Name and His sovereignty, may He be blessed, are called upon us, Israel, in particular, as it is written, “And He has raised up a horn for His people,” “He declares His words to Yaakov,” etc.;
Contemplating this, every soul yearns to cleave to G‑d, all the more when one recalls that His great Name and kingship rest upon Israel in particular. Verses recited in Pesukei deZimra say this: He has raised up the horn of His people (Psalms 148:14) and declares His words to Yaakov (Psalms 147:19).
וכתיב כי יעקב בחר לו45 יה ישראל לסגולתו ואומרים ברוך ה׳ אלקי ישראל67 דייקא אזי תתעורר השמחה בלב איש ישמח ישראל בעושיו89 בשמחה גדולה לאלקים שהשרה שכינתו בתוכנו וינהו כל10 בית ישראל אחרי ה׳
and it is written, “For Yah has chosen Yaakov for Himself, Israel for His treasure”; and we say, “Blessed is Havayah, the G‑d of Israel,” [Israel] specifically. Then joy will be aroused in a person’s heart, “Let Israel rejoice in its Maker,” with a great joy for G‑d, Who has caused His Shechinah (Divine Presence) to dwell in our midst; “and all the house of Israel yearned after Havayah.”
Psalms says that G‑d chose Yaakov and Israel as His treasure (Psalms 135:4), and in the prayers we bless Him as “the G‑d of Israel” (Psalms 106:48), naming Israel specifically. This awakens joy, “Let Israel rejoice in its Maker” (Psalms 149:2), in G‑d who made His Shechinah dwell among us, so that the whole house of Israel yearns after Him (I Samuel 7:2).
ואח״כ ברכות ק״ש [קריאת שמע] איך שהמלאכים מקדישים כו׳ ואהבת עולם אהבתנו חמלה גדולה ויתירה11 פי׳ יתירה מהמלאכים כו׳ כמ״ש בסש״ב [בספר של בינונים].
And afterwards [come] the blessings of the Shema: how the angels sanctify, etc.; and “With an everlasting love You have loved us… a great and exceeding compassion,” “exceeding” meaning more than the angels, etc., as is explained in Sefer Shel Beinonim (Tanya).
Then come the blessings before the Shema: the first describes the angels’ sanctification, and the second, Ahavas Olam, speaks of G‑d’s “great and exceeding compassion.” Tanya, chapter 49, explains “exceeding” as exceeding the nearness to G‑d of all the heavenly hosts.
The praises of Pesukei deZimra and the blessings of the Shema bring the soul from yearning to joy, as it sees that G‑d’s Name rests on Israel and that His love for them exceeds even His love for the angels.
In Tanya, chapter 49, the Alter Rebbe explains “great and exceeding compassion” as exceeding the nearness to G‑d of all the heavenly hosts, and as the reason He contracted His infinite light into finite worlds, to bring Israel close to Him. Here it is the last stage before the Shema itself.
Marei mekomos
- 1וירם קרן לעמו · Psalms 148:14
- 2מגיד דבריו ליעקב · שם קמז, יט.
- 3מגיד דבריו ליעקב · Psalms 147:19
- 4כי יעקב בחר לו י״ה · שם קלה, ד.
- 5כי יעקב בחר לו יה ישראל לסגולתו · Psalms 135:4
- 6ברוך ה׳ אלקי ישראל · שם קו, מח.
- 7ברוך ה׳ אלקי ישראל · Psalms 106:48
- 8ישמח ישראל בעושיו · שם קמט, ב.
- 9ישמח ישראל בעושיו · Psalms 149:2
- 10וינהו כל ב״י אחרי ה׳ · I Samuel 7:2
- 11חמלה גדולה ויתירה · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 49:11
And from this he will rise, come and arrive at self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh) in the Shema, at “One,” and at “You shall love… with all your heart,” with both your inclinations.
From this, prayer rises to self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh) at the word “One” of the Shema, and then to the love of “with all your heart,” which the Sages read as “with both your inclinations,” the good and the evil (Berakhot 54a). So the evil inclination, too, is to be turned to love of G‑d.
דהיינו שגם כח המתאוה שבנפש הבהמית שבאדם המתאוה לדברים גשמיים וצרכי גופו בתענוגות בני אדם ישוב אל2 ה׳ ויחפוץ בקרבת אלקים כי טוב שהוא מקור כל התענוגים וחיי החיים ב״ה ואזי יתענג על3 ה׳ ממש.
That is, even the desiring faculty of the animal soul in man, which desires physical things and the needs of his body, in the delights of mankind, will return to G‑d and desire nearness to G‑d, for it is good, since He is the source of all delights and the Life of life, blessed be He; and then he will truly delight in G‑d.
Even the animal soul’s desire for physical things and bodily pleasures turns back to G‑d and comes to desire nearness to Him, because He is the true source of all pleasure and the Life of all life. Then the person truly delights in G‑d, in the words of Psalms 37:4.
The ascent of prayer reaches its peak in the Shema, where the animal soul’s own power of desire is transformed into love of G‑d, the source of all delight.
This is the inner meaning of the altar’s “eating”: the animal soul offered up and consumed in love. The next paragraphs explain why this transformation is called “very good,” beyond the love of the G‑dly soul.
Marei mekomos
- 1ואהבת בכל לבבך בשני יצריך · Deuteronomy 6:5
- 2ישוב אל ה׳ · Isaiah 55:7
- 3יתענג על ה׳ · Psalms 37:4
Why the transformed evil is “very good” ¶8–10
8וע״ז דרשו רז״ל [רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] בפסוק וירא אלקים1 את כל אשר עשה והנה טוב מאד טוב זה מלאך חיים2 מאד זה מ״ה [מלאך המות]3 כו׳
And on this our Sages, of blessed memory, expounded the verse “And G‑d saw all that He had made, and behold, it was very good”: “‘Good’ — this is the angel of life; ‘very’ — this is the angel of death,” etc.
The Sages read “very good” at the end of the creation story as including the angel of death: “good” is the angel of life, “very” is the angel of death (Bereshit Rabbah 9:10). The maamar uses this teaching to show what is gained when the animal soul is transformed.
ולכאורה יפלא הרי הוא המ״ה [המלאך המות] הוא היצה״ר [היצר הרע] ומה היא טובתו ולא עוד אלא שנק׳ טוב מאד יותר ממלאך החיים.
At first glance this is astonishing: the angel of death is, after all, the evil inclination; so what is its goodness? And not only that, but it is called “very good,” more than the angel of life.
This is puzzling, since the angel of death is the evil inclination itself, as Reish Lakish says: the Satan, the evil inclination and the angel of death are one (Bava Basra 16a). How can it be good at all, let alone “very good,” better than the angel of life?
אלא הענין הוא שאין טובתו של היצה״ר [היצר הרע] כשהוא בתקפו אלא כד אתכפיא סט״א [סטרא אחרא]4 כו׳
But the matter is that the goodness of the evil inclination is not when it is in its strength, but rather “when the sitra achra (the other side) is subdued,” etc.
The evil inclination is good not while it is strong, but when it is subdued, as in the Zohar’s phrase “when the sitra achra is subdued.” Its value lies in being overcome and turned around.
דהיינו שכאשר כח המתאוה שבלב האדם שמנפשו הבהמית מתהפך וישוב לאהבת ה׳ בכל לבבו
That is, when the desiring faculty in a person’s heart, which is from his animal soul, is transformed and returns to love of G‑d with all his heart,
This happens when the craving in a person’s heart, which comes from his animal soul, is turned around and becomes love of G‑d “with all his heart,” the love that includes both inclinations.
שאזי גם היצה״ר [היצר הרע] שמשכנו בלב ששם משכן נפש הבהמית בחלל השמאלי הנה מלאך רע בע״כ [בעל כרחך]5 יענה אמן ומסכים ומתרצה להודות על האמת כי הוא ית׳ חיי החיים ומקור התענוגים ואליו יאתה להיות כלתה נפשו לה׳6 בתשוקה וצמאון כו׳.
then even the evil inclination, whose dwelling is in the heart (for there, in the left chamber, is the dwelling of the animal soul) — “the evil angel, against his will, answers Amen,” and agrees and is reconciled to acknowledge the truth: that He, may He be blessed, is the Life of life and the source of delights, and to Him it is fitting that one’s soul should pine for G‑d with longing and thirst, etc.
Then the evil inclination itself, which dwells in the heart’s left chamber where the animal soul resides, assents: in the Talmud’s phrase, “the evil angel, against his will, answers Amen” (Shabbat 119b). It agrees that G‑d is the Life of life and the source of all pleasure, and that it is right for the soul to pine for Him with longing and thirst (see Psalms 84:3).
The animal soul’s transformation explains why the evil inclination can be called “very good”: once it is subdued and turned to love of G‑d, it itself assents to the truth.
The Midrash’s reading of “very good” is interpreted here through the Zohar’s principle that the subduing of the sitra achra brings about the greatest revelation of G‑d’s glory, which the next paragraph spells out.
Marei mekomos
- 1וירא אלקים · Genesis 1:31
- 2טוב זה מלאך חיים · ב״ר פט, י. ילקוט בראשית (ר׳ טז). ובזח״ב (סח, ב. קנ, א. קסג, א) [כ].
- 3טוב זה מלאך חיים מאד זה מ״ה · Bereshit Rabbah 9:10
- 4כד אתכפיא סט״א · Zohar II, 128b
- 5מלאך רע בע״כ · Shabbat 119b:3
- 6כלתה נפשי לה׳ · Psalms 84:3
9ובעבור זה אסתלק יקרא דקוב״ה [דקודשא בריך הוא] לעילא1 כי זה הוא תכלית המכוון בבריאת העולמות להיות יתרון זה בנפש הבהמית השבה אל ה׳ כיתרון ה אור הבא מן החושך כנודע וכמ״ש במ״א.
And because of this “the glory of the Holy One, blessed be He, is exalted above”; for this is the ultimate intent in the creation of the worlds: that there be this advantage in the animal soul that returns to G‑d, like the advantage of the light that comes from the darkness, as is known and as is explained elsewhere.
When the sitra achra is subdued, “the glory of the Holy One, blessed be He, is exalted above,” as the Zohar continues. This is the very purpose of creating the worlds: the special advantage of an animal soul that returns to G‑d, like the advantage of light that comes out of darkness (Ecclesiastes 2:13).
ולכן הוא טוב מאד יותר ממלאך החיים שהוא בעצמו ממקור החיים והטוב, אבל מלאך רע שירד למדרגת מות ורע כשנתהפך לבחי׳ טוב וחיים הוא מעולה יותר כמשל יתרון האור כו׳
Therefore it is “very good,” more than the angel of life, which is in itself from the source of life and goodness; but the evil angel, which descended to the rank of death and evil, when it is transformed into the level of good and life, is superior, as in the analogy of the advantage of light, etc.
The angel of life is good by its source, so its goodness adds nothing new. The evil angel had fallen to the level of death and evil, so when it is transformed into goodness and life it surpasses the angel of life, as light that comes out of darkness is the greater light.
[ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה אלה מסעי2 וע׳ בזהר ר״פ יתרו דס״ח ע״ב34 ובפ׳ בהעלותך דף קנ״ג סע״ב [סוף עמוד ב] ומ״ש לקמן ע״פ והיה הבן הבכור לשניאה]5
[And see what is written on this in the discourse beginning “These are the journeys”; and see in the Zohar, at the beginning of Parshas Yisro, page 68b, and in Parshas Beha’aloscha, page 153, end of side b; and what is written below on the verse “And the firstborn son is of the hated one.”]
The bracket sends the reader to further discussions. In Likkutei Torah, Masei (“These are the journeys”), the Alter Rebbe explains that G‑d created the kelipos so that subduing and transforming them would bring the great ascent; in Likkutei Torah, Ki Seitzei, he reads “the firstborn son of the hated one” as the animal soul, whose root is so high that once its evil is separated out it reaches great love with added strength. The Zohar at the beginning of Yisro and in Beha’aloscha is cited for the same theme.
וגם כמ״ש בזה״ק [בזהר הקדוש] במקום שבע״ת [שבעלי תשובה] כו׳ דמשכין לי׳6 בחילא יתיר7 שהוא מחמת יותר תגבורת כו׳
And also, as is written in the holy Zohar, “In the place where penitents (baalei teshuvah) [stand],” etc., for they draw it “with greater strength”; that is because of greater intensity, etc.
The Zohar likewise explains the Sages’ saying that where penitents stand, the perfectly righteous cannot stand (Berakhot 34b): penitents draw it down “with greater strength.” This is because their love has a greater intensity.
שכאשר האהבה בתגבורת מבחי׳ רשפי אש האהבה8 היא כמעלת הזהב על הכסף היא האהבה שבטבעה כתולדתה שנמשלה למים משוך אחריך כמים9 כו׳.10
For when love is intense, from the level of “flashes of fire,” this love is like the superiority of gold over silver, [silver] being the love that is in [the soul’s] nature, as it was born, which is likened to water: drawn after You like water, etc.
Intense love, like “flashes of fire” (Song of Songs 8:6), is to natural love as gold is to silver. The soul’s natural, inborn love is likened to water, as the Prayer for Rain on Shemini Atzeres says of Avraham that he was “drawn after You like water.”
The transformed animal soul brings the greatest revelation of G‑d’s glory, like light out of darkness; its love, like that of penitents, is a fiery love that surpasses the G‑dly soul’s natural love as gold surpasses silver.
Likkutei Torah, Bamidbar, cited in the note, makes the same point: the emotions of the animal soul are by nature stronger than those of the G‑dly soul, as an animal is stronger than a man, and so when they are turned to G‑d they are “very good.” Their root is in the faces of the lion and the ox in the Chariot, which the next section develops.
Marei mekomos
- 1אסתלק יקרא דקוב״ה לעילא · Zohar, Terumah 6:38–7:45
- 2בד״ה ואלה מסעי · ראה לקמן מסעי צא, ג.
- 3בזהר ר״פ יתרו דס״ח ע״ב · ראה גם לעיל פ׳ במדבר יט, א.
- 4בזהר ר״פ יתרו דס״ח ע״ב · Zohar, Yitro 1:28–39
- 5ע״פ והיה הבן הבכור לשניאה · פ׳ כי תצא.
- 6בזה״ק במקום שבע״ת כו׳ דמשכין לי׳ · ח״א קכט, ב.
- 7דמשכין לי׳ בחילא יתיר · Zohar, Chayei Sara 16:121–17:127
- 8רשפי אש האהבה · Song of Songs 8:6
- 9משוך אחריך כמים · ברכת גשם דשמע״צ.
- 10כיתרון האור הבא מן החושך · Ecclesiastes 2:13
10והאהבה כרשפי אש נולדה מהתבוננות זו שבתפלה ופסוד״ז [ופסוקי דזמרה] בסידור שבחיו של מקום בעומק דעתו בגדולת א״ס ב״ה ורוממותו לאין קץ ובברכת יוצר ואהבת עולם כו׳
And the love like flashes of fire is born from this contemplation in prayer and in Pesukei deZimra (the Verses of Praise), in setting out the praises of the Omnipresent with the depth of one’s mind, on the greatness of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, and His exaltedness without end, and in the blessing “Who forms [light]” and in “With an everlasting love,” etc.,
This fiery love is born of the contemplation in prayer: in Pesukei deZimra, setting out G‑d’s praises with deep thought about His infinite greatness, and in the blessings before the Shema, Yotzer and Ahavas Olam.
עד שיגיע לקיום מס״נ [מסירות נפש] באחד וקיום ואהבת כו׳ כנ״ל וכמ״ש במ״א1 ע״פ מצרף לכסף2 וכור לזהב ואיש לפי מהללו,
until he reaches the fulfillment of self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh) at “One” and the fulfillment of “You shall love,” etc., as mentioned above; and as is explained elsewhere on the verse “The refining pot is for silver and the furnace for gold, and a man according to his praise.”
The contemplation goes on until one reaches self-sacrifice at “One” and the love of “You shall love.” The Alter Rebbe recalls his explanation elsewhere of Proverbs 27:21: in Torah Ohr (Supplements, Ki Sisa) he explains that after the contemplation of the Shema, the love from above comes down in the Amidah like the lion-shaped fire on the altar and consumes the animal soul, as the refiner’s fire separates silver from its dross.
פי׳ שבאיש3 לפי מהללו בק״ש [בקריאת שמע] ותפלה ופסוקי דזמרה נעשה מצרף וכור הן רשפי אש האהבה לכלות ולשרוף את כח המתאוה שבנפש הבהמית עד שישוב לאהבת ה׳ ולדבקה בו בתשוקה וצמאון ובכלות הנפש ממש:
That is, in “a man according to his praise”: in the Shema and prayer and Pesukei deZimra, a refining pot and a furnace are made. These are the flashes of the fire of love, to consume and burn up the desiring faculty in the animal soul until it returns to love of G‑d and to cleaving to Him with longing and thirst, and with a veritable expiring of the soul.
“A man according to his praise” means that a person’s own praises of G‑d, in the Shema, prayer and Pesukei deZimra, become the refining pot and the furnace: the flashes of the fire of love, which burn away the animal soul’s cravings until it returns to love of G‑d and longs to cleave to Him. This is the inner fire of prayer that corresponds to the fire on the altar.
The fiery love comes from the contemplation of prayer, which works like a refiner’s furnace, burning away the animal soul’s cravings and turning them into love of G‑d.
The verse’s pairing of silver and gold recalls the previous paragraph, where fiery love is gold and the soul’s natural love is silver; prayer’s praises are the furnace in which the animal soul’s desire is refined.
Marei mekomos
- 1וכמ״ש במ״א · ראה תו״א קיא, ג. בסה״מ תקס״ג ע׳ קעז. כתובים-ב ע׳ ריח. תורת חיים שמות דף תתקסז, א. אוה״ת שמות כי תשא ע׳ א׳תתמג, א׳תתפה. שמות-ז ע׳ ב׳תשפז.
- 2מצרף לכסף · Proverbs 27:21
- 3פי׳ שבאיש · ראה סה״מ תרכ״ז ע׳ רכו.
The root of the animal soul and the tumult of the Ofanim ¶11–12
11ב והנה הכח הזה לנפש הבהמית שתתפעל מגדולת א״ס ב״ה ורוממותו עד שתתלהט ותתלהב בתשוקה וצמאון לה׳ ולדבקה בו12 ית׳ עד שישוב ויתהפך כח המתאוה שבה לאהבת ה׳
2. Now, this power that the animal soul has, to be stirred by the greatness and exaltedness of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, until it is kindled and set aflame with longing and thirst for G‑d and to cleave to Him, may He be blessed, until its desiring faculty returns and is transformed into love of G‑d,
The second section asks where the animal soul gets the power to be so stirred by G‑d’s greatness that it burns with longing and thirst to cleave to Him, until its very desire is turned into love of G‑d. The question concerns the animal soul itself, not only the G‑dly soul.
הוא מפני ששרש נפש הבהמית שבאדם נלקחה מהאופנים וחיות הקדש שבמרכבה פני אריה ופני שור3 כו׳
[this] is because the root of the animal soul in man was taken from the Ofanim and the holy Chayos of the Chariot, the face of a lion and the face of an ox, etc.
This power comes from the animal soul’s root in the Ofanim and the holy Chayos, the angels of the Divine Chariot that Yechezkel saw, with the faces of a lion and an ox (Ezekiel 1:10).
(הגם כי שרש כל נפש הבהמות הוא ג״כ מבחי׳ פני אריה פני שור ושרש נפש העופות מבחי׳ פני נשר כמ״ש במ״א, ובמה תפרד שרש וחיות נפש הבהמית שבאדם שבודאי אינה דומה לנפש שבבהמות ממש.
(Although the root of the soul of all animals is also from the level of the face of a lion [and] the face of an ox, and the root of the soul of birds is from the level of the face of an eagle, as is explained elsewhere; so in what is the root and life-force of the animal soul in man distinguished, since it is certainly not like the soul in actual animals?
A long parenthesis raises a difficulty: the souls of ordinary animals are also rooted in the faces of the lion and the ox, and those of birds in the face of the eagle. If so, how does the animal soul in a human being differ, since it is surely not like an animal’s soul?
שהרי נפש הבהמית שבאדם היא נפש המשכלת ומדברת שגדלה וגבהה מעלתה לאין קץ על נפש שבבהמות ממש שאינה אלא נפש חיה בלבד ואין ערוך לחי עם מדבר כנודע.
For the animal soul in man is an intelligent and speaking soul, whose rank is infinitely greater and higher than the soul in actual animals, which is only a living soul and nothing more; and there is no comparison between the animal and the speaking [being], as is known.
A person’s animal soul is an intelligent, speaking soul, immeasurably higher than the merely living soul of an animal. There is no comparison between the “living” and the “speaking” levels of creation.
אך הענין הוא שארבע חיות שבמרכבה ארבעה פנים לכל אחת מהנה ויש בכל אחת מהן דמות אדם וכמ״ש ודמות פניהם פני אדם ושרש וחיות נפש הבהמית שבאדם הוא מבחי׳ אדם שבחיות שבמרכבה
But the matter is that the four Chayos of the Chariot each have four faces, and in each of them there is the likeness of a man, as it is written, “And the likeness of their faces: the face of a man”; and the root and life-force of the animal soul in man is from the level of “man” within the Chayos of the Chariot,
The answer: each of the four Chayos of the Chariot has four faces, and each includes the likeness of a man. The human animal soul is rooted in the “man” within those Chayos.
כי גם בחי׳ פני שור ופני אריה כלולים מבחי׳ אדם וכמ״ש בזהר4 ושרש נפש הבהמות שמבחי׳ פני שור היינו מבחי׳ פני שור בעצם כו׳.5 [ועמ״ש מזה בביאור ע״פ אני ישנה6 ובד״ה אם בחקתי תלכו7 ובד״ה בכ״ה בכסליו8 ובד״ה המגביהי לשבת]9
for even the levels of the face of an ox and the face of a lion are comprised of the level of man, as is written in the Zohar; while the root of the soul of animals, which is from the level of the face of an ox, is from the level of the face of an ox in itself, etc. [And see what is written on this in the explanation of the verse “I am asleep,” and in the discourse beginning “If you walk in My statutes,” and in the discourse beginning “On the twenty-fifth of Kislev,” and in the discourse beginning “Who is enthroned on high.”]
Even the faces of the ox and the lion are comprised of the aspect of man, as the Zohar says, while ordinary animals come from the face of the ox in itself, without that human element. In Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim (“I am asleep”), one of the places the bracket names, the Alter Rebbe explains that the inner aspect of what comes from the Ofanim is the animal soul in man, with intellect and emotions, and its outer aspect is the soul of an actual animal.
והנה האופנים וחיות הקדש10 ברעש גדול מתנשאים לעומת השרפים.11 וענין הרעש הוא מחמת ששומעים את השרפים שאומרים קדוש ג״פ [ג׳ פעמים] וזהו ענין לעומת השרפים.
Now, “the Ofanim and the holy Chayos, with a great tumult, raise themselves facing the Seraphim.” The tumult is because they hear the Seraphim saying “holy” three times; and this is the meaning of “facing the Seraphim.”
The text now quotes the first blessing before the Shema: the Ofanim and holy Chayos rise “with a great tumult” facing the Seraphim, because they hear the Seraphim proclaim “holy” three times. In Likkutei Torah, Haazinu, the Alter Rebbe places the Seraphim in the World of Beriah, where they grasp the threefold “holy,” and the Ofanim in Asiyah, where they cannot contain it and so storm.
וביאור ענין זה כי הנה פי׳ וביאור מלת קדוש הוא לומר שהוא קדוש ומובדל בערך שאין לו ערך ויחוס בעלמין שאינו לא בגדר ממלא ולא בגדר סובב דלאו מכל מדות אלין12 כלל.13
The explanation of this: the meaning and explanation of the word “holy” (kadosh) is to say that He is holy and separate in degree, having no comparison or relation to the worlds, being neither within the bounds of the light that fills [all worlds] (memalei) nor within the bounds of the light that encompasses [all worlds] (sovev), for He is “not of any of these attributes at all.”
“Holy” (kadosh) means set apart and beyond all relation to the worlds, neither the light that fills them nor the light that encompasses them. As the Tikkunei Zohar, a companion work to the Zohar, says of G‑d, He is “not of any of these attributes at all.”
אך קדוש בוי״ו הוא ענין המשכה מקדש עליון [ועיין מ״ש מזה בד״ה צאינה וראינה14 בענין שאו ידיכם קדש].
But kadosh with a vav is a drawing down from the supernal kodesh (holiness). [And see what is written on this in the discourse beginning “Go forth and gaze,” on the matter of “Lift up your hands in holiness.”]
Yet kadosh, spelled with a vav, signifies something drawn down from the higher kodesh, holiness itself, spelled without one. The added vav stands for the drawing down.
כי ענין קדש הוא מלה בגרמיה15 שהוא ענין עצמיות קדושת אור א״ס ב״ה שכשמו כן הוא אין לו סוף ואין לו תכלה כו׳
For kodesh is a thing unto itself: it is the very essence of the holiness of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, which is just as its name: it has no end and no limit, etc.
Kodesh, “a thing unto itself” in the Zohar’s words, is the very essence of the holiness of the Infinite Light, which, as its name Ein Sof says, has no end and no limit.
ואין העולמות יכולים לקבל אור א״ס ב״ה כמו שהוא שהיו בטלים במציאות והיו כלא היו אלא ע״י צמצום גדול להמשיך התפשטות זיו והארה בלבד בבחי׳ קו וחוט כו׳ והוא ענין קדוש בוי״ו בבחינת המשכה
And the worlds cannot receive the Infinite Light, blessed be He, as it is, for they would be nullified out of existence and would be as though they had never been, except through a great tzimtzum (contraction), to draw down an extension of radiance and illumination alone in the manner of a kav (line of light) and a thread, etc.; and this is kadosh with a vav, in the aspect of a drawing down.
The worlds could not receive the Infinite Light as it is; they would be nullified out of existence. Only through a great tzimtzum is a mere ray drawn down, like a thin line (kav), and this drawing down is kadosh with a vav.
אך גם ההמשכה ההיא עדיין היא בבחי׳ קדוש ומובדל שאין העולמות יכולים להשיג עד שנעשה המשכה והארה דהארה והוא ענין קדוש השני המשכה והארה מקדוש הראשון. וכן ענין קדוש השלישי הוא ענין המשכה והארה דהארה שנמשך מקדוש הב׳.
But even that drawing down is still in the state of holy and separate, which the worlds cannot grasp, until there comes about a drawing down and an illumination of an illumination; and this is the second “holy,” a drawing down and illumination from the first “holy.” And likewise the third “holy” is a drawing down and an illumination of an illumination, drawn from the second “holy.”
Even that ray is still “holy and separate,” beyond the worlds’ grasp, so it must be dimmed again into a glimmer of a glimmer: this is the second “holy.” The third “holy” is a still further glimmer drawn from the second.
ובזה יוכל להיות בחי׳ הוי׳ להיות כל הנמצאים העליונים שישיגו יקר תפארת גדולתו ורוממותו לאין קץ באיזה השגה ותפיסה ויתענגו על ה׳ בהשגתם תענוג נפלא [ועמ״ש מענין ג״פ [ג׳ פעמים] קדוש בביאור ע״פ אחרי16 ה׳ אלקיכם תלכו ובד״ה רני ושמחי17 בת]
And through this there can be the level of Havayah, so that all the higher beings may come to be, who will grasp the precious splendor of His infinite greatness and exaltedness with some measure of comprehension and grasp, and will delight in G‑d in their comprehension with a wondrous delight. [And see what is written on the matter of the three times “holy” in the explanation of the verse “After Havayah your G‑d shall you walk,” and in the discourse beginning “Sing and rejoice, O daughter.”]
Only then can there be “Havayah,” the bringing into being of the higher creations, who can grasp something of G‑d’s greatness and take wondrous delight in it. The verse “Holy, holy, holy is Havayah Tzevaos” thus traces the descent from G‑d’s essential holiness to the created worlds; in Torah Ohr (“Sing and rejoice”) the three times “holy” correspond to the first three letters of the Name Havayah.
ואעפ״כ [ואף על פי כן] נק׳ צבאות אות הוא בצבא דיליה18 שאי נו בבחי׳ השגה אלא עד״מ בבחי׳ אות אחת מענין שלם בהשכלה והשגה שלימה שהאות ההוא אין לו ערך להיות נק׳ עליו כלל שם השגה אלא רמז בעלמא.
Yet even so He is called Tzevaos: “He is an os (sign) in His host (tzava).” That is, it is not in the manner of comprehension, but, by way of analogy, like a single letter (os) of a whole matter understood and comprehended in full; for that letter bears no comparison such that the term “comprehension” could be applied to it at all, but is a mere hint.
Even so, G‑d is called Tzevaos, read as “He is an os (sign) in His host (tzava)”; os also means “letter,” and what the hosts grasp is like a single letter of a whole idea. A single letter gives no real comprehension of an idea at all; it is only a hint.
וכך הוא ענין השגת העולמות ואפילו עולמות עליונים מאחר שהן בבחי׳ נבראים ומחודשים מאין ליש אין להם תפיסה והשגה בו ית׳ בעצמו ובכבודו שאתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם כו׳
And so it is with the comprehension of the worlds: even the higher worlds, since they are in the state of created beings, brought into being anew from nothing to something, have no grasp or comprehension of Him, may He be blessed, as He is Himself and in His glory, “You are He before the world was created,” etc.;
So it is with all the worlds, even the highest: as created beings, brought from nothing into existence, they cannot grasp G‑d as He is in Himself, as He was before creation.
ואין להם תפיסה אלא בחיות המתפשט בעולמות להחיותם ולהוותם מאין ליש שהוא בבחי׳ אות אחת ביו״ד נברא העוה״ב [העולם הבא]19 ובה׳ העוה״ז ואין להם השגה אלא בבחי׳ יו״ד כו׳.
they have a grasp only of the life-force that spreads through the worlds to give them life and to bring them into being from nothing to something, which is in the state of a single letter: “With the yud the World to Come was created, and with the hei this world”; and they have comprehension only of the level of yud, etc.
They grasp only the life-force that spreads through them to sustain them, which is like a single letter. The Talmud says that this world was created with the letter hei and the World to Come with the yud (Menachos 29b); even the highest creations grasp no more than the level of the yud.
והנה כאשר האופנים שומעים את השרפים אומרים כן מרעישים בקול רעש גדול מחמת ששומעים דבר גדול שהוא למעלה מהשגתם
Now, when the Ofanim hear the Seraphim saying so, they make a tumult with the sound of a great tumult, because they hear something great that is above their comprehension.
When the Ofanim hear the Seraphim proclaim “holy,” they are thrown into a great tumult, because what they hear is far above their comprehension.
שאינו נתפס ונקלט בהשגתם בבחי׳ פנימית רק בבחי׳ מקיף שאין כח בבחי׳ כלי השגתם להכיל ההשגה הגדולה והנוראה ההיא אלא נשאר עליהם בבחי׳ מקיף ומ״מ בבחי׳ מקיף משיגים שיש דבר גדול ונורא ונמשך מזה רשימו לבחי׳ פנימית להיות בבחי׳ רעם ורעש לבד
[It] is not grasped and absorbed in their comprehension in an inward way, but only in an encompassing way (makif); for the vessels of their comprehension do not have the power to contain that great and awesome comprehension, and it remains over them as something encompassing. Nevertheless, in an encompassing way they grasp that there is something great and awesome, and from this an impression (reshimu) is drawn into the inner level, so that there is thunder and tumult alone.
It cannot be absorbed inwardly and remains above them as an encompassing light (makif), too great for the vessels of their understanding. Still, they sense that something great and awesome is there, and its impression filters inward, producing only thunder and tumult.
כי כל דבר חידוש שאינו מושג בשכל רק שמ״מ שומע בבחי׳ מקיף ונכנס רשימו לבחי׳ פנימי׳ [פנימיות / פנימית] נעשה מזה התפעלות בבחי׳ פנימי׳ [פנימיות / פנימית] לומר ראה זה חדש הוא20 שאין כח בשכלו לתפוס ולהשיג הדבר ההוא כמו שהוא בעצמו
For with anything novel that is not grasped by the intellect, but which one nevertheless hears in an encompassing way, and an impression of it enters the inner level, there arises from this an inner stirring, to say, “See, this is new,” for his intellect does not have the power to grasp and comprehend that thing as it is in itself.
This is how any truly new thing works: when one cannot understand it but senses it from beyond, its impression produces an inner excitement that says, “See, this is new” (Ecclesiastes 1:10). The mind is stirred precisely because it cannot grasp the thing as it is.
ומזה מתהוה הרעש שמחמת גודל עוצם הפלאת הדבר הנורא שאין כח בשכלו לתפוס כו׳ יתהוה לו רעש גדול כו׳
And from this the tumult arises: because of the great intensity of the wondrousness of the awesome thing, which his intellect does not have the power to grasp, etc., a great tumult arises in him, etc.
The awe of something too wondrous for the mind to hold is what produces the great tumult.
והשרפים לפי ששרשם ממקום הרעש ההיא כמ״ש שרפים עומדים ממעל לו21 ואין השגה זו חידוש אצלם כל כך [והוא ענין מארז״ל [מאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] גבי ישעיה כבן כרך שראה22 את המלך כו׳ וכמ״ש במ״א] לכן אינם מרעישים
But the Seraphim, since their root is from the place of that tumult, as it is written, “Seraphim stood above Him,” and this comprehension is not such a novelty to them [and this is the matter of the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, regarding Yeshayahu, “like a city-dweller who saw the king,” etc., as is explained elsewhere], therefore make no tumult.
The Seraphim stand “above Him” (Isaiah 6:2), at the source of this revelation, so it is not such a novelty to them and they make no tumult. The Sages similarly compare Yeshayahu, who describes the vision briefly, to a city-dweller who often sees the king (Chagigah 13b).
כי לכן נק׳ שמם שרפים שכבר נשרפו כו׳ [וכיוצא בזה גבי חברי דניאל שלא השיגו המראה רק דמזלייהו חזי23 נפלה חרדה גדולה עליהם יותר מדניאל שראה את המראה כמ״ש במ״א].24
For this is why they are called by the name Seraphim: they have already been burned up (nisrefu), etc. [And similar to this regarding Daniel’s companions: they did not perceive the vision; only “their mazal saw,” yet a great trembling fell upon them, more than upon Daniel, who saw the vision, as is explained elsewhere.]
They are called Seraphim, “burning ones,” from the same root as nisrefu, “burned,” because they have already been consumed in their closeness to G‑d. So too Daniel’s companions did not see the vision, yet their mazal, their soul’s source above, saw it, and they were more terrified than Daniel himself (Megillah 3a); Tanya, chapter 23, applies the same principle, “although he does not see, [his mazal sees],” to one who studies Torah.
ולפי שנה״ב [שנפש הבהמית] שרשה מבחי׳ אופנים וחיות ע״כ יש בה הכח הזה שתתפעל בבחי׳ רעש. וזהו ענין בחילא יתיר. טוב מאוד יותר מבחי׳ אהבת הנה״א [הנפש האלקית] בעצמה:)25
And because the root of the animal soul is from the level of the Ofanim and Chayos, it therefore has this power to be stirred in the manner of tumult. And this is the meaning of “with greater strength”: “very good,” more than the level of the love of the G‑dly soul itself.)
Because the animal soul is rooted in the Ofanim and Chayos, it too has this power to be stirred into tumult. That is the “greater strength” mentioned earlier, and the reason its love is “very good,” more than the G‑dly soul’s own love.
ג והנה ע״י הרעש נעשה כמים הפנים לפנים26 כן לב האדם לאדם. פי׳ האדם27 לאדם כי יש אדם שעל דמות הכסא28 דמות כמראה אדם.
3. Now, through the tumult there comes about “As in water face [answers] to face, so the heart of man to man.” The meaning of “man to man” is that there is a “man” upon the likeness of the throne: “a likeness like the appearance of a man.”
The third section: the tumult brings about “As in water face answers to face, so the heart of man to man” (Proverbs 27:19). There is a “man” above, on the Throne, as Yechezkel saw: “a likeness like the appearance of a man” (Ezekiel 1:26).
ויש בחי׳ אדם שמתחת לכסא ואפילו הג׳ חיות פני אריה פני שור פני נשר הם בבחי׳ אדם וכמ״ש במרכבת יחזקאל ודמות פניהם29 פני אדם כו׳ לארבעתן כו׳
And there is a level of “man” beneath the throne; even the three Chayos, the face of a lion, the face of an ox [and] the face of an eagle, are at the level of “man,” as is written in Yechezkel’s Chariot, “And the likeness of their faces: the face of a man,” etc., “for the four of them,” etc.
There is also a “man” beneath the Throne: the Chayos themselves, whose faces all include the face of a man, “for the four of them,” as in Yechezkel’s vision of the Chariot.
[ועיין מזה בזהר פ׳ במדבר דקי״ח ע״ב30 ובפי׳ הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] שם ובזהר פ׳ תזריע דמ״ח סע״א [סוף עמוד א] ובפ׳ בראשית די״ח סע״ב [סוף עמוד ב]]31
[And see on this in the Zohar, Parshas Bamidbar, page 118b, and in the commentary of the Ramaz (Rabbi Moshe Zacuto) there; and in the Zohar, Parshas Tazria, page 48, end of side a; and in Parshas Bereishis, page 18, end of side b.]
The bracket sends the reader to the Zohar on Bamidbar, with the commentary of the Ramaz, Rabbi Moshe Zacuto, the seventeenth-century Kabbalist who annotated the Zohar, and to the Zohar on Tazria and on Bereishis, for the face of man within the Chayos.
וכמים הפנים לפנים כן לב האדם שלמעלה על הכסא לאדם שמתחת לכסא באתעדל״ת [באתערותא דלתתא] דיליה בבחי׳ רעש גדול כנ״ל.
And “as in water face [answers] to face, so the heart of” the “man” who is above, upon the throne, [answers] to the “man” who is beneath the throne, through his arousal from below (isarusa dilesata), in the manner of a great tumult, as mentioned above.
As a face is reflected in water, the “man” above answers the “man” below. The arousal from below, the great tumult of the Ofanim and of the animal soul rooted in them, calls forth a response from the “man” on the Throne.
The animal soul can be transformed because its root is in the angels of the Chariot, whose “tumult” at a revelation beyond their grasp gives them, and it, a love of “greater strength”; and that tumult below calls forth a response from the “man” on the Throne above.
The three times “holy” are read as three stages of descent from G‑d’s essential holiness (kodesh) to the light that brings the worlds into being; Torah Ohr, on “Sing and rejoice,” links them to the first three letters of the Name Havayah, with the final hei as speech, the source of the worlds. The contrast between the calm Seraphim and the stormy Ofanim parallels the contrast between the G‑dly soul’s natural love and the animal soul’s fiery love.
Marei mekomos
- 1ולדבקה בו · Deuteronomy 11:21
- 2ולדבקה בו · Deuteronomy 30:20
- 3פני ארי׳ פני שור · Ezekiel 1:10
- 4וכמ״ש בזהר · ח״ג (קיח, ב. מח, סע״א). [כ].
- 5מבחי׳ פני שור בעצם כו׳ · ראה לעיל בהוספות יח, ג בהערות שנעתקו מכ״ק אדמו״ר מוהרש״ב נ״ע.
- 6בביאור ע״פ אני ישנה · לקמן שה״ש לה, א ואילך.
- 7ובד״ה אם בחקתי תלכו · לעיל בחקתי מז, ג. וראה במ״מ לשם.
- 8זבד״ה בכ״ה בכסלו · תו״א וישב כט, ב ואילך.
- 9ובד״ה המגביהי לשבת · תו״א לח, ב.
- 10האופנים וחיות הקודש · ברכת יוצר. ההפרש בין אופנים לשרפים ראה גם לקמן פ׳ שלח מז, א. האזינו עד, ג. סה״מ תקס״ב ע׳ מו ואילך. אוה״ת תרומה ע׳ א׳קסד ואילך.
- 11האופנים וחיות הקדש ברעש גדול מתנשאים לעומת השרפים · Siddur Ashkenaz, Weekday, Shacharit, Blessings of the Shema, First Blessing before Shema 6–8
- 12דלאו מכל מדות אלין · ת״ז בהקדמה (פתח אלי׳).
- 13דלאו מכל מדות אלין כלל · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:5–7
- 14בד״ה צאינה וראינה · לקמן שה״ש כא, ג.
- 15קדש הוא מלה בגרמי׳ · Zohar III, 94b
- 16בביאור ע״פ אחרי ה׳ · לקמן פ׳ ראה כ, ד ואילך.
- 17ובד״ה רני ושמחי · תו״א לו, ב.
- 18צבאו׳ אות הוא בצבא דילי׳ · Chagigah 16a
- 19ביו״ד נברא העוה״ב · Menachot 29b:13–14
- 20ראה זה חדש הוא · Ecclesiastes 1:10
- 21שרפים עומדים ממעל לו · Isaiah 6:2
- 22ישעי׳ כבן כרך שראה · Chagigah 13b:5
- 23חברי דניאל . . דמזלייהו חזי · Megillah 3a:13–14
- 24כמ״ש במ״א] · ראה תניא פרק כג.
- 25מבחי׳ אהבת הנה״א בעצמה · קיצור — באוה״ת במדבר-ד ע׳ א׳תסב.
- 26כמים הפנים לפנים · Proverbs 27:19
- 27פי׳ האדם · ראה אוה״ת בשלח ע׳ תעז ואילך.
- 28על דמות הכסא · Ezekiel 1:26
- 29ודמות פניהם · Ezekiel 1:10
- 30בזהר פ׳ במדבר דקי״ח ע״ב · Zohar, Bamidbar 3:27–38
- 31ובפ׳ בראשית די״ח סע״ב · Zohar, Bereshit 7:70–8:83
12ופי׳ פניהם פני אדם1 היינו שבפנימיותם דבחי׳ אופנים וחיות הוא בחי׳ אדם וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] בנה״ב [בנפש הבהמית] שבאדם בפנימיותה היא נפש השכלית.
And the meaning of “their faces: the face of a man” is that in the inner dimension (pnimiyus) of the Ofanim and Chayos there is the level of “man”; and likewise with the animal soul in man: in its inner dimension it is the intellectual soul.
The face of a man in the Chayos means that their inner dimension is “man”: panim, “face,” shares its root with pnimiyus, “inner dimension.” So too with the animal soul in a person: at its core it is the intellectual soul.
ועמ״ש בד״ה וספרתם לכם2 בענין ופניהם וכנפיהם3 שהטעם על ופניהם הוא בזקף גדול שהוא הפסק להפסיק בין ופניהם לוכנפיהם כו׳ ע״ש
And see what is written in the discourse beginning “And you shall count for yourselves,” on the matter of “and their faces and their wings”: that the cantillation mark on “and their faces” is a zakef gadol, which is a pause, to separate “and their faces” from “and their wings,” etc.; see there.
The maamar “And you shall count for yourselves,” on counting the Omer, explains Yechezkel’s words “and their faces and their wings were separate above” (Ezekiel 1:11). The cantillation mark on “and their faces” is a zakef gadol, a pausing note that separates the faces from the wings.
ועי״ז אתעדל״ת [אתערותא דלתתא] בבחי׳ הנה״ב [הנפש הבהמית] והשכלית זהו בחי׳ לב האדם התחתון אל האדם כו׳4 נמשך אתעדל״ע [אתערותא דלעילא] מלמעלה. וביאור ענין אתעדל״ע [אתערותא דלעילא] זו יובן ג״כ בענין הקרבנות.
And through this arousal from below (isarusa dilesata) in the animal soul and the intellectual [soul] — this is the level of “the heart of” the lower “man” toward the “man,” etc. — an arousal from above (isarusa dile’eila) is drawn down from on high. And the explanation of this arousal from above will also be understood from the matter of the offerings.
Through this arousal from below, in the animal soul and the intellectual soul, the “heart” of the lower man turns toward the “man” above, and an arousal from above is drawn down in response. That arousal from above can be understood through the offerings.
כי הנה הקרבנות להקריב חלב ודם של הבהמה ע״ג [על גבי] המזבח הוא ג״כ בחי׳ העלאה דנפש הבהמה ששרשה מחיות ואופנים מבחי׳ פני שור כו׳.
For the offerings, offering the fat and blood of the animal upon the altar, are also a level of raising up the soul of the animal, whose root is from the Chayos and Ofanim, from the level of the face of an ox, etc.
Offering an animal’s fat and blood on the altar also raises up the animal’s soul, which is rooted in the Chayos and Ofanim, in the face of the ox.
The animal soul’s inner core is human and intellectual; its arousal from below, like the raising up of an animal on the altar, draws down an arousal from above.
Marei mekomos
- 1פניהם פני אדם · Ezekiel 1:10
- 2בד״ה וספרתם לכם · לעיל פ׳ במדבר י, א.
- 3ופניהם וכנפיהם · Ezekiel 1:11
- 4בחי׳ לב האדם התחתון אל האדם כו׳ · באוה״ת במדבר-ד ע׳ א׳תסב יש הגה״ה לכאן.
Two fires, and two kinds of offering ¶13–14
13והנה היו מביאים אש שלמטה ועי״ז נחית אשא עילאה אריה דאכיל קרבנין12 אריה מלך3 שבחיות להתכלל באש שלמעלה.
Now, they would bring fire from below, and through this the supernal fire would come down, the “lion that eats the offerings,” the lion, king of the beasts (chayos), to become included in the fire above.
In the Temple, ordinary fire was brought to the altar from below, and through it the fire from above came down (Yoma 21b), the “lion that eats the offerings.” The lion is “king of the beasts” (Chagigah 13b), and chayos means both “beasts” and the Chayos of the Chariot; the fire below was absorbed into the fire above.
וכך ג״כ בתפלה בהעלאת נה״ב [נפש הבהמית] יש ג״כ ב׳ בחי׳ אשות הנ״ל העלאה והמשכה וכ״ז [וכל זה] נק׳ אכילת מזבח וכן הענין ג״כ למעלה בנשמות שמיכאל כה״ג [כהן גדול] מקריב4 ע״ג [על גבי] המזבח5
And so too in prayer, in the raising up of the animal soul, there are also the two levels of fire mentioned above, a raising up and a drawing down; and all this is called the eating of the altar. And so is the matter also above, with the souls, which Michael, the Kohen Gadol (High Priest), offers upon the altar;
Prayer has the same two fires: the raising up of the animal soul from below and the drawing down of fire from above, and both are called the “eating” of the altar. So too in the heavens: the angel Michael, the heavenly Kohen Gadol, offers up the souls on the supernal altar.
כי הנשמות הן בחי׳ נבראים מאין ליש וע״י מיכאל נקרבים למעלה מעלה ליכלל באצי׳ דאיהו וחיוהי6 וגרמוהי חד:7
for the souls are at the level of created beings, [brought] from nothing to something, and through Michael they are offered up higher and higher, to become included in Atzilus, where “He, His life-forces and His vessels are one.”
Souls are created beings, brought into being from nothing, and through Michael they are raised higher and higher until they are absorbed into Atzilus, the world where G‑d, His life-forces and His vessels are one.
The offering’s two fires, from below and from above, appear in prayer and in the heavens, where Michael raises the souls into the unity of Atzilus.
For Michael’s offering of the souls the Kehot note cites the Zohar (3:33a; 1:80a) and Tosafos at the end of Menachos. “He, His life-forces and His vessels are one” comes from the introduction to the Tikkunei Zohar (3b), where it describes the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus.
Marei mekomos
- 1ארי׳ דאכיל קרבנין · Zohar I, 6b
- 2אריה דאכיל קרבנין · Zohar, Vayikra 40:278–41:285
- 3ארי׳ מלך שבחיוח · Chagigah 13b:5–6
- 4בנשמות שמיכאל כה״ג מקריב · Zohar III, 33a
- 5שמיכאל כה״ג מקריב ע״ג המזבח · Zohar, Tzav 20:135–145
- 6באצי׳ דאיהו וחיוהי · ת״ז בהק׳ (ג, ב). באוה״ת במדבר-ד ע׳ א׳תסב נמצא הג״ה וקיצור לכאן.
- 7דאיהו וחיוהי וגרמוהי חד · Tikkunei Zohar 3b:9–10
14והנה הקרבת הקרבנות ע״ג [על גבי] המזבח נק׳ בשם אכילה כמארז״ל [כמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] בשתי אכילות הכתוב מדבר1 א׳ אכילת אדם וא׳ אכילת מזבח לפי שהיא בחי׳ פנימית2 אכלתי יערי עם דבשי3 (ועמ״ש בד״ה ואם האכל יאכל בפ׳ שלח).4
Now, the bringing of the offerings upon the altar is called by the name “eating,” as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Scripture speaks of two eatings: one, the eating of man, and one, the eating of the altar,” because it is an inner level: “I have eaten my honeycomb with my honey” (and see what is written in the discourse beginning “And if it be eaten at all,” in Parshas Shelach).
The altar’s consuming of the offerings is called “eating” (Zevachim 13b) because it is an inner level: like food, it is taken inside, as the verse says, “I have eaten my honeycomb with my honey” (Song of Songs 5:1). In Likkutei Torah, Shelach (“And if it be eaten at all”), the Alter Rebbe explains the inner dimension (pnimiyus), from panim, “face,” by which every being turns toward its source and cleaves to it.
אבל יש בחינה אחרת והיא בחי׳ מקיף שהיא ענין הקטרת שהוא רק ריח שהנשמה נהנית ממנו ולא הגוף56 שאינו נכנס בגוף כלל בבחי׳ פנימית רק בבחי׳ מקיף מלמעלה7
But there is another level, the level of the encompassing (makif), which is the incense: it is only a fragrance, which the soul enjoys and not the body, for it does not enter the body at all in an inward way, but only in an encompassing way, from above.
There is another level, the encompassing (makif): the incense. Fragrance, the Sages say, is what the soul enjoys and not the body (Berakhot 43b); it does not enter the body inwardly but affects it from above.
(ונתבאר מזה בביאור ע״פ באתי לגני8 גבי אריתי מורי וכמו שהחוטם הוא למעלה מהחיך כו׳. ועמ״ש ע״פ ראה ריח בני בפ׳ תולדות9 ע״ש בענין העלאת מ״ן [מיין נוקבין] שבבחי׳ מקיף, ועיין בזהר ס״פ ויקהל) (דרי״ט10 א׳) מענין קטרת
(This was explained in the explanation of the verse “I have come into My garden,” regarding “I have gathered My myrrh,” and as the nose is higher than the palate, etc. And see what is written on the verse “See, the fragrance of my son,” in Parshas Toldos; see there on the matter of the raising of mayin nukvin (feminine waters) that is in an encompassing way. And see in the Zohar, at the end of Parshas Vayakhel) (page 219a), on the matter of the incense;
This is explained in the discourse on “I have come into My garden,” on “I have gathered My myrrh”: smell, through the nose, is higher than taste, through the palate. The discourse on “See, the fragrance of my son” (Torah Ohr, Toldos) treats the raising of mayin nukvin, the soul’s upward yearning, as an encompassing level, and the Zohar at the end of Vayakhel contrasts prayer with the service of the incense.
ובפ׳ בהעלותך (דקנ״א ע״ב) ושם מבואר ג״כ מענין מזבח הפנימי ומזבח החיצון
and in Parshas Beha’aloscha (page 151b), where the inner altar and the outer altar are also explained,
The Zohar in Beha’aloscha also explains the inner altar, on which the incense was burned, and the outer altar, which received the animal offerings.
והיינו בחינת פנימית הלב וחיצונית הלב ועמ״ש בד״ה מי מנה עפר יעקב11 בענין ויחד לבבנו כו׳ ע״ש
that is, the level of the inner dimension (pnimiyus) of the heart and the outer dimension (chitzoniyus) of the heart. And see what is written in the discourse beginning “Who has counted the dust of Yaakov,” on the matter of “and unite our heart,” etc.; see there.
The inner and outer altars correspond to the inner and outer dimensions of the heart. In Likkutei Torah, Balak (“Who has counted the dust of Yaakov”), on the prayer “and unite our heart,” the Alter Rebbe explains that the inner point of the heart holds a great love above reason that comes from above as a gift, while the outer heart holds the love born of contemplating G‑d’s greatness.
ועמ״ש עוד מענין קטרת לעיל ע״פ נשא את ראש בני גרשון,12 ובד״ה בכ״ה בכסלו13 וע׳ מ״ש הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] ס״פ בא14 ע״פ הרע״מ [הרעיא מהימנא] שם ד״מ ע״ב.
And see what is written further on the matter of the incense above, on the verse “Lift up the head of the sons of Gershon,” and in the discourse beginning “On the twenty-fifth of Kislev”; and see what the Ramaz (Rabbi Moshe Zacuto) writes at the end of Parshas Bo, on the Raaya Mehemna there, page 40b.
Earlier in this parsha, on “Lift up the head of the sons of Gershon,” the Alter Rebbe explains that the incense on the inner altar was also a refinement, its eleven spices raising up the eleven “crowns of impurity,” and he cites there the same Zohar and the Ramaz on the Raaya Mehemna (the “Faithful Shepherd” section of the Zohar) at the end of Bo. The Torah Ohr discourse for Chanukah, “On the twenty-fifth of Kislev,” also explains the fragrance of the incense.
Two kinds of offering are distinguished: the altar’s “eating,” an inner level, and the incense, an encompassing level whose fragrance the soul enjoys and the body does not; they correspond to the inner and outer altars and to the inner and outer heart.
The Tzemach Tzedek, quoting this passage in Or HaTorah, raises a difficulty: the soul is itself an inner light within the body, so if the soul enjoys the fragrance, how is it encompassing? He answers that it is encompassing only relative to the body, while for the soul it is a real enjoyment.
Marei mekomos
- 1בשתי אכילות הכתוב מדבר · Zevachim 13b:3
- 2לפי שהיא בחי׳ פנימית · ראה באוה״ת שה״ש-ב ע׳ תפג.
- 3אכלתי יערי עם דבשי · Song of Songs 5:1
- 4בד״ה ואם האכל יאכל בפ׳ שלח · לקמן מא, ד ואילך.
- 5אבל יש בחינה אחרת והיא בחי׳ מקיף . . שהנשמה נהנית ממנו ולא הגוף · מובא באוה״ת ויקרא-א ע׳ רצב וכתב ע״ז ”וצ״ע שהרי הנשמה עכ״פ נהנית ממנו והנשמה היא אור פנימי המלובש תוך הגוף. וא״כ הא״פ נהנה מן הריח רק הגוף אינו נהנה ממנו, וא״כ איך הוא מקיף, אלא צ״ל רק להגוף נחשבו מקיף אבל להנשמה הגם שהיא או״פ זהו הנאה ממש” ע״ש.
- 6ריח שהנשמה נהנית ממנו ולא הגוף · Berakhot 43b:3
- 7בבחי׳ מקיף מלמעלה · באוה״ת במדבר-ד ע׳ א׳תסב נמצא הג״ה לכאן.
- 8בביאור ע״פ באתי לגני · לקו״ת שה״ש לג, א.
- 9ע״פ ראה ריח בני בפ׳ תולדות · תו״א כ, ד.
- 10בזהר ס״פ ויקהל (דרי״ט א׳) · מובא גם לעיל כב, ד. אוה״ת בראשית-א דף קנב, א. תצוה ע׳ תשס.
- 11בד״ה מי מנה עפר יעקב · לקמן סז, ג.
- 12ע״פ נשא את ראש בני גרשון · לעיל כב, ד.
- 13ובד״ה בכ״ה בכסלו · תו״א כט, ד. וראה באוה״ת במדבר-ד ע׳ א׳תסה מה שהעתיק מתו״א.
- 14וע׳ מ״ש הרמ״ז ס״פ בא · ראה לעיל כב, ד. ובמ״מ לשם.
Chinuch: the extra gift of a beginning ¶15–17
15והנה הקטרת לא היתה קריבה על מזבח החיצון כ״א על מזבח הפנימי.1 אך ורק בנשיאים היתה הוראת שעה שהקריבו קטרת ע״ג [על גבי] מזבח החיצון.
Now, the incense was not offered on the outer altar, but only on the inner altar. Only with the princes, however, was there a one-time ruling, that they offered incense upon the outer altar.
The incense was normally burned only on the inner, golden altar inside the Sanctuary. Only for the princes was there a one-time ruling, allowing them to offer incense on the outer altar.
That was for the sake of the dedication of the altar. And this term chanukah (dedication) is from the word chinuch (education), as in “Educate a youth according to his way”;
This was for the sake of the altar’s dedication. The word chanukah, “dedication,” is related to chinuch, “education,” as in “Educate a youth according to his way” (Proverbs 22:6).
והיינו כמשל התינוק שמחנכין אותו ללמוד נותנין לו מתנה יתירה כדי להרגילו להתחיל בלימוד משא״כ כשהוא כבר הרגיל א״ע [את עצמו] והתחיל כו׳.
that is, as in the analogy of the young child whom they train to learn: they give him an extra gift in order to accustom him to begin learning; whereas when he has already accustomed himself and begun, etc.
When a child is first trained to learn, he is given an extra gift to accustom him to begin; once he is used to learning, this is no longer needed. The dedication of the altar is a similar initiation.
The princes’ incense on the outer altar was an exceptional act of dedication, chanukah in the sense of chinuch: the extra inducement given at a beginning.
The Kehot note points to further treatments of chanukah as chinuch: the Mitteler Rebbe’s Shaarei Orah on Chanukah, a discourse of 5635, and talks of the Rebbe in Likkutei Sichos.
Marei mekomos
- 1כ״א על מזבח הפנימי · ראה הגהה לכאן באוה״ת במדבר-ד ע׳ א׳תסד.
- 2מלשון חינוך · וראה גם בשערי אורה ד״ה בכ״ה בכסלו פל״ז. סה״מ תרל״ה-ב ע׳ של ואילך. לקו״ש חכ״ה ע׳ 383 ואילך. וראה לקו״ש חל״ב ע׳ 105 הערה 72.
- 3חנוך לנער ע״פ דרכו · Proverbs 22:6
16והיינו שהחינוך ללמוד אינו ע״י הלימוד בלבד שזהו דבר ההוה לו תמיד אלא שמחנכין אותו ע״י איזו תוספת כמו איזו התקרבות או איזו מתנה כו׳
That is, training [a child] to learn is not through the learning alone, which is the regular thing for him at all times; rather, they train him through some addition, such as some closeness or some gift, etc.
Training a child to learn does not come from the learning alone, which is his ordinary daily routine. It needs something extra, some closeness or a gift.
אך לאחר שכבר חינכו אותו די בדבר ההוה תמיד והיינו משום שכל התחלות קשות.
But after they have already trained him, the regular thing suffices. And that is because “all beginnings are difficult.”
Once the child is trained, the routine is enough, for “all beginnings are difficult” (as Rashi says on Exodus 19:5), and only the start needs the added help.
ולכן כדי שתהיה ההתחלה צ״ל ע״י חינוך. (וכמ״ש במ״א בד״ה בכ״ה בכסלו1 הנ״ל בענין חנוך לנער ע״פ דרכו).
Therefore, for there to be a beginning, it must come through chinuch (education). (As is explained elsewhere, in the discourse beginning “On the twenty-fifth of Kislev” mentioned above, on the matter of “Educate a youth according to his way.”)
So every beginning must come through chinuch, an initiation. The Alter Rebbe refers to his Chanukah discourse, “On the twenty-fifth of Kislev,” on “Educate a youth according to his way”; in Likkutei Torah, V’Zos HaBerachah, he gives the same explanation in almost the same words for the dedication of the Temple.
וזהו ג״כ ענין הבו לה׳ כבוד כו׳ ואחר כך קול ה׳ על המים23 כו׳ ז׳ קולות ופי׳ קול הוא המשכה כמו קול גשמי היוצא מן הלב אל הדבור
And this is also the matter of “Render unto Havayah glory,” etc., and afterwards “The voice of Havayah is upon the waters,” etc., the seven voices. The meaning of “voice” is a drawing down, like a physical voice that goes out from the heart to speech;
Psalm 29 follows the same pattern: first “Render unto Havayah glory,” and only then the seven “voices of Havayah,” beginning “The voice of Havayah is upon the waters.” A “voice” means a drawing down, as the physical voice carries feeling from the heart into speech.
והנה הוא המחבר המדה שבלב עם הדבור להיות נראים ונתגלים אופן המדות שבלב למהות אחר בדבור וה״ז [והרי זה] בחי׳ ירידה ממהות מדה למהות דבור.
for it is what joins the attribute in the heart with speech, so that the form of the emotive attributes (middos) in the heart becomes seen and revealed in another mode, in speech; and this is a level of descent from the mode of an attribute to the mode of speech.
The voice links the feeling in the heart with speech, so that the emotion becomes visible in another form, as words. It is a descent from one mode, emotion, to another, speech.
וירידה והמשכה זו היא ע״י הקול. ועד״ז כל ירידה והמשכה ממהות למהות אחר נק׳ בשם קול.
And this descent and drawing down is through the voice. Along these lines, every descent and drawing down from one mode to another mode is called by the name “voice.”
This descent happens through the voice, and so any descent from one mode of being into another is called a “voice.”
וזהו ענין קלא פנימאה דלא אשתמע45 הוא בחי׳ המשכה משכל למדות כו׳ (ועמ״ש מזה בשה״ש [בשיר השירים] ע״פ קול דודי67 הנה זה בא).
And this is the meaning of “the inner voice that is not heard”: it is the level of a drawing down from intellect to the emotive attributes, etc. (And see what is written on this in Shir HaShirim, on the verse “The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes.”)
The Zohar’s “inner voice that is not heard” is the drawing down from intellect into emotion, before anything reaches speech. In Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim (“The voice of my beloved”), the Alter Rebbe contrasts the “small voice” that is heard, drawn from the emotions into speech, with the “great voice” that is not heard, and calls every drawing down from concealment into revelation a “voice.”
וזהו ענין ז׳ קולות שהם ז׳ בחינות המשכות וירידות בז׳ המדות. מים הוא חסד וכח הוא בחי׳ גבורה כו׳.
The psalm’s seven voices are seven drawings down into the seven emotive attributes. The voice “upon the waters” is Chesed, the voice “with power” is Gevurah, and so on through the seven.
וההמשכה הוא מעלמא דאתכסיא89 שלמעלה מהמדות (וכענין שבעה ושבעה מוצקות10 לנרות ששבעת הנרות הן שבעה מדות והמוצקות הן המשכות ממד רגות עליונות להמדות ע׳ [עיין] בזהר ס״פ מקץ)11 (דר״ד סע״ב [סוף עמוד ב])12 ועמ״ש בד״ה כי עמך מקור חיים.
And the drawing down is from the hidden world (alma de’iskasya), which is above the attributes (like the matter of “seven, and seven pipes to the lamps,” for the seven lamps are seven attributes and the pipes are drawings down from higher levels to the attributes; see in the Zohar, at the end of Parshas Mikeitz) (page 204, end of side b). And see what is written in the discourse beginning “For with You is the source of life.”
These drawings down come from the “hidden world” (alma de’iskasya), the level above the attributes. So too Zechariah saw seven lamps with seven pipes feeding them (Zechariah 4:2): the lamps are the seven attributes, and the pipes bring them light from higher levels, as the Zohar explains at the end of Mikeitz.
וכ״ה עוד בזהר דשבעה מוצקות הן שבעה הבלים כו׳ ועיין מענין שבעה הבלים בזהר פ׳ תזריע דמ״ז ע״ב13 וכל המשכה הוא ע״י שם הוי׳ יו״ד צמצום כו׳
And so it is also in the Zohar, that the seven pipes are seven havalim (breaths), etc.; and see on the matter of the seven havalim in the Zohar, Parshas Tazria, page 47b. And every drawing down is through the Name Havayah: the yud is tzimtzum (contraction), etc.
The Zohar also calls the seven pipes “seven havalim,” seven breaths; in Likkutei Torah, Bamidbar, the Alter Rebbe explains the seven havalim of Koheles as the seven attributes, a mere breath that does not touch G‑d’s essence. Every drawing down comes through the Name Havayah, whose first letter, the yud, stands for tzimtzum, contraction.
ולכן בכדי שיהיה ירידה והשפלה זו מבחי׳ שם הוי׳ בז׳ קולות האלו מקדימים בחי׳ הבו לה׳ כבוד הוא ענין מקיף והארה יתירה כדי להיות נמשך אח״כ הז׳ קולות.
Therefore, in order that there be this descent and lowering from the level of the Name Havayah into these seven voices, the level of “Render unto Havayah glory” comes first: this is something encompassing (makif) and an additional illumination, so that the seven voices may afterwards be drawn down.
Therefore, to bring this descent from the Name Havayah into the seven voices, the psalm first says, “Render unto Havayah glory.” Glory is an encompassing, extra illumination that makes the descent possible.
והכבוד הזה צריך להמשיך מתחלה קודם הז׳ קולות14 (בר״ח [בראשית חכמה] פ״ב [פרק ב׳] משער היראה הביא מהרע״מ [מהרעיא מהימנא] פ׳ פנחס דרנ״ה ע״ב בענין הראני נא את כבודך15 שהוא בחי׳ כתר עליון כו׳ וע׳ בזהר בהעלותך דקנ״ד16 א׳ בענין קרנו תרום בכבוד17
And this glory must be drawn down at the outset, before the seven voices. (In Reishis Chochmah, chapter 2 of Shaar HaYirah, he brings from the Raaya Mehemna, Parshas Pinchas, page 255b, on the matter of “Show me, please, Your glory,” that it is the level of the supernal Keser (Crown), etc.; and see in the Zohar, Beha’aloscha, page 154a, on the matter of “His horn shall be exalted in glory”;
This glory must be drawn down before the seven voices. Reishis Chochmah, the classic work of Rabbi Eliyahu de Vidas, cites the Raaya Mehemna that the “glory” of “Show me, please, Your glory” is the supernal Keser (Crown), and the Zohar on Beha’aloscha discusses “His horn shall be exalted in glory.”
והיינו כי פי׳ הבו לה׳ כבוד היינו איך שבאמת למעלה הוא היש וכולא קמיה כלא ממש חשיבא ועמ״ש בביאור ע״פ כי ביום הזה יכפר מענין כבוד חכמים ינחלו18 כו׳ ע״ש)
that is, because the meaning of “Render unto Havayah glory” is how, in truth, above, it is He Who is the existence (yesh), and “all before Him is considered as truly nothing.” And see what is written in the explanation of the verse “For on this day He shall atone,” on the matter of “The wise shall inherit glory,” etc.; see there.)
“Render unto Havayah glory” means recognizing that above, in truth, only He truly exists, and everything before Him is as nothing. The explanation of “For on this day He shall atone” develops this in connection with “The wise shall inherit glory.”
וכן הוא הענין שנותנין מתנה לכבוד חתן וכלה לפי שנעשה יחוד חדש כי חתן חות דרגא וכלה כלתה נפשי ממטה למעלה.
And so it is with giving a gift in honor (kavod) of a bridegroom and bride: because a new union comes about. For chasan (bridegroom) is “descending a level” (chas darga), and kallah (bride) is “my soul pines” (kalsah nafshi), from below upward.
The same holds for the gift given in honor of a groom and bride: their marriage is a new union. The Alter Rebbe reads chasan (groom) as a descent of a level, from above, and kallah (bride) as the soul’s pining upward, from below.
והם שני הפכים שמתייחדים וכדי להמשיך יחוד חדש כזה צריך להמשיך תחלה בחי׳ כבוד שהיא תוספת הארה בבחי׳ מקיף.
And they are two opposites that unite; and to draw down such a new union, one must first draw down the level of kavod (glory), which is an additional illumination in an encompassing way.
Groom and bride are two opposites, descent and ascent, that unite. To bring about such a new union, one must first draw down kavod, honor or glory, an extra, encompassing illumination.
Every new beginning needs an added, encompassing light: the child’s gift, the “glory” that precedes the seven voices of Psalm 29, and the gift to a groom and bride all show that kavod must come before a new descent or union.
The seven voices of Psalm 29 are read as the seven emotive attributes, drawn down from the hidden world above them through the Name Havayah. “Glory,” which the Raaya Mehemna links with the supernal Keser, comes first as the encompassing light that makes that descent possible.
Marei mekomos
- 1בד״ה בכ״ה בכסלו · תו״א כט, ד. וראה גם לקו״ת נשא צח, א. ברכה צח, ב ואילך.
- 2הבו לה׳ כבוד . . קול ה׳ על המים · Psalms 29:1
- 3קול ה׳ על המים · Psalms 29:3
- 4קלא פנימאה דלא אשתמע · זח״א (נ, ב) [כ].
- 5קלא פנימאה דלא אשתמע · Zohar, Bereshit 83:235–86:248
- 6בשה״ש ע״פ קול דודי · לקו״ת שה״ש טו, ב.
- 7
- 8עלמא דאתכסיא · זח״א (יח, א. קנב, א. קנח, ב). ובזח״ב (כט, ב). [כ].
- 9מעלמא דאתכסיא · Zohar, Bereshit 6:60–7:70
- 10שבעה ושבעה מוצקות · Zechariah 4:2
- 11בזהר ס״פ מקץ · Zohar, Miketz 15:261–269
- 12בזהר ס״פ מקץ (דר״ד סע״ב) · בענין שבעה ושבעה מוצקות ראה אוה״ת ויקרא-א ע׳ רעט. ביאוה״ז להצ״צ-ב ע׳ תתעז.
- 13בזהר פ׳ תזריע דמ״ז ע״ב · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא-א ע׳ רפ ואילך. ובביאוה״ז להצ״צ-ב ע׳ תתעז ואילך. ע׳ תתפא ואילך נזכר גם לעיל פ׳ במדבר יב, ד.
- 14להמשיך מתחילה קודם הז׳ קולות · באוה״ת במדבר-ד ע׳ א׳תסה נמצא הגה״ה.
- 15הראני נא את כבודך · Exodus 33:18
- 16בזהר בהעלותך דקנ״ד א׳ · Zohar, Beha'alotcha 15:87–16:94
- 17קרנו תרום בכבוד · Psalms 112:9
- 18כבוד חכמים ינחלו · Proverbs 3:35
17ועד״ז הקריבו הנשיאים בחנוכת המזבח קערות ומזרקי כסף וכפות זהב אף שמנחת נדבה מביאה בכפיפה מצרית1 רק הנשיאים עשו לכבוד ולתפארת
And in the same way, at the dedication of the altar, the princes offered silver bowls and basins and golden spoons, although a voluntary meal offering is brought in an Egyptian basket; but the princes did it “for glory and for splendor.”
Like the gift that initiates a child, the princes brought silver bowls and basins and golden spoons at the dedication of the altar. A voluntary meal offering could be brought in a plain Egyptian basket, but the princes did it “for glory and for splendor.”
וזה היה ג״כ ענין הקרבת הקטרת על מזבח החיצון שאינו דבר ההוה כלל שדבר ההוה היינו קרבנות תמידין כו׳ רק כמו שמחנכין התינוק ע״י מתנה יתירה דוקא. כך היה ענין הקרבת הקטרת שהוא המשכת בחי׳ מקיפים
And this was also the matter of offering the incense on the outer altar, which is not at all the regular thing — the regular thing being the daily offerings, etc. — but rather, just as one trains a young child specifically through an extra gift, so was the offering of the incense, which is the drawing down of the level of the encompassing [lights] (makifim).
Burning incense on the outer altar was likewise out of the ordinary, since the regular service there was the daily offerings. It was the extra gift of an initiation, like the gift given to a child beginning to learn, and it drew down the encompassing lights (makifim).
וכך הוא ענין הכבוד שעי״ז יוכל להיות אח״כ סדר הקרבנות תמידין כסדרן2 וכו׳ זהו ענין חינוך המזבח כנודע:3
And so is the matter of the glory, through which there could afterwards be the order of the offerings, “the daily offerings according to their order,” etc. This is the matter of the chinuch (dedication) of the altar, as is known.
So too the “glory” of the precious vessels: through these encompassing gifts the regular order of offerings, “the daily offerings according to their order” (a phrase of the Musaf prayer), could follow. This is what the chinuch (dedication) of the altar means.
The princes’ precious vessels and their incense on the outer altar were the extra, encompassing “glory” of an initiation, which made possible the regular service that followed.
In a note cited by Kehot (Likkutei Sichos, vol. 7, p. 205), the Rebbe takes up the statement that a voluntary meal offering may be brought in an Egyptian basket, although the Talmud (Sotah 14b) treats such a vessel as unfit because of “Offer it now to your governor.” He explains, citing the Kesef Mishneh, that this disqualification is not from the Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1שמנחת נדבה מביאה בכפיפה מצרית · בלקו״ת נשא (כט, ב) שמנחת נדבה מביאה בכפיפה מצרית, שזהו דלא כמפורש בסוטה (יד, ב) דפסול — הרי מפורש שם שהטעם דהקריבהו נא לפחתך גו׳, ואיסור זה אינו מן התורה (כס״מ הל׳ איס״מ פ״ב ה״י (ודלא כי״א מהאחרונים דאסור מה״ת — דלפ״ז אינו מובן הא דעניים מביאים בכורים בסלי נצרים של ערבה (בכורים פ״ג מ״ח) שבודאי פחותים מנצרי דקל (דהיינו כפיפה מצרית, כפרש״י בסוטה שם) דסברת הקריבהו שייך גם באינו קרב על המזבח ממש, וק״ל)) — לקו״ש ח״ז ע׳ 205.
- 2תמידין כסדרן · תפלת מוסף.
- 3זהו ענין חינוך המזבח כנודע · קיצור באוה״ת במדבר-ד ע׳ א׳תסה.
The anointing oil and the answer ¶18–19
18אך כדי להיות המשכת קטרת שהוא בחי׳ מקיף צ״ל משיחת המזבח בשמן המשחה. כי שמן המשחה הוא ממוצע בין פנימי למקיף
But for there to be the drawing down of the incense, which is the level of the encompassing (makif), there must be the anointing of the altar with the anointing oil. For the anointing oil is an intermediary between the inner and the encompassing;
For the encompassing light of the incense to be drawn down, the altar first had to be anointed with the anointing oil. The oil is an intermediary between the inner and the encompassing.
כי שמן הוא משקה ובשמן המשחה היה מעורב בשמים ראש1 מר דרור קנמן בשם2 כו׳ שהוא ענין הריח הרי שהיה תערובות בחי׳ פנימי ומקיף.
for oil is a drink, and mixed into the anointing oil were “choice spices: flowing myrrh… fragrant cinnamon,” etc., which is the matter of fragrance; thus there was a blending of the levels of the inner and the encompassing.
Oil is a drink, something taken inside, like the inner level; yet the anointing oil was blended with fragrant spices, myrrh and cinnamon (Exodus 30:23), and fragrance is the encompassing level. So the anointing oil combines the inner and the encompassing.
The anointing oil, a drink mixed with fragrance, bridges the inner and the encompassing, which is why it had to come before the incense.
For the spices mixed into the anointing oil, the Kehot note points to the Tzemach Tzedek’s Derech Mitzvosecha.
Marei mekomos
- 1היה מעורב בשמים ראש · ראה דרך מצותיך עב, ב.
- 2בשמים ראש מר דרור וקנמן בשם · Exodus 30:23
19ומ״מ בחי׳ מקיף נקרב ביום המשח שהכל בחי׳ א׳. משא״כ שאר הקרבנות שהם אכילת המזבח ולזבח השלמים כל הבקר לעולה1 כו׳ היה אחרי המשח.
Nevertheless, the level of the encompassing was offered “on the day it was anointed,” for it is all one level. Whereas the rest of the offerings, which are the eating of the altar, “and for the sacrifice of the peace offerings,” “all the cattle for the burnt offering,” etc., were “after it was anointed.”
Because the anointing oil includes the encompassing level, the encompassing offerings belong with the anointing itself and could be brought “on the day it was anointed,” as one matter. The offerings that are the altar’s “eating,” the peace offerings and “all the cattle for the burnt offering” (Numbers 7:87), came “after it was anointed.”
שמתחלה היה צ״ל בחי׳ המקיף לחינוך ואח״כ היתה אכילת המזבח ולכך בקרבנות שהם אכילת המזבח כתיב אחרי המשח אותו. ובקטרת והבאת הקערות שהם בבחי׳ מקיף ובחי׳ כבוד כתיב ביום המשח.2
For first there had to be the level of the encompassing, for the dedication (chinuch), and afterwards came the eating of the altar. Therefore, of the offerings that are the eating of the altar it is written, “after it was anointed”; and of the incense and the bringing of the bowls, which are in the state of the encompassing and the level of glory, it is written, “on the day it was anointed.”
First came the encompassing level, for the initiation, and only then the altar’s eating. So the Torah says “after it was anointed” of the eating offerings, and “on the day it was anointed” of the incense and the bowls, the encompassing level and the level of glory; this answers the question with which the maamar began.
(ואפשר עד״ז יש לפרש מ״ש ברבות נשא פרשה י״ג וז״ל [וזה לשונו] כתיב זאת חנוכת המזבח ביום המשח אותו והלא קערה אחת היתה ומזרק אחד היה וכף אחת היתה ביום המשח אותו3 מה ת״ל קערות כסף שתים עשרה וגו׳ אלא העלה עליהם כאלו כולם הקריבו ביום ראשון וביום אחרון4 עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו].
(And perhaps along these lines one may explain what is said in [Midrash] Rabbah, Nasso, section 13; these are its words: “It is written, ‘This is the dedication of the altar on the day it was anointed.’ But was there not one bowl, one basin and one spoon on the day it was anointed? Why then does the verse say, ‘twelve silver bowls,’ etc.? Rather, He accounted it to them as if they had all offered on the first day and on the last day.” End of quote.
The Alter Rebbe suggests that this also explains a Midrash (Bamidbar Rabbah 13:9). It asks why the verse speaks of twelve bowls when only one bowl, one basin and one spoon were brought on the day of the anointing, and answers that G‑d credited them as though all of them had offered on the first day and on the last day.
And so it is also there, section 14, and in [Midrash] Shir HaShirim on the verse “You are all fair, my beloved.”
The same teaching appears in Bamidbar Rabbah 14 and in Shir HaShirim Rabbah on “You are all fair, my beloved” (Song of Songs 4:7).
והיינו שבחי׳ הקטרת והבאת הקערות של כולם הוא בבחי׳ ביום המשח אותו וע״ז אמר כאילו הקריבו כולם ביום ראשון ובחי׳ הקרבנות ולזבח השלמים הוא בכולן בבחי׳ אחרי המשח אותו וזהו וביום אחרון):
That is, the level of the incense and the bringing of the bowls of all of them is in the state of “on the day it was anointed,” and of this it said, “as if they had all offered on the first day”; while the level of the offerings, “and for the sacrifice of the peace offerings,” is for all of them in the state of “after it was anointed,” and this is “and on the last day.”)
The incense and bowls of all the princes count as “on the day it was anointed,” the first day; the peace offerings of all of them count as “after it was anointed,” the last day. So both verses hold for every prince.
The maamar resolves its opening question: the encompassing offerings belong to the day of the anointing, the “eating” offerings come after it, and this also explains the Midrash that every prince is credited with offering on the first day and on the last.
Marei mekomos
- 1כל הבקר לעולה · Numbers 7:87
- 2כתיב ביום המשח · באוה״ת במדבר-ד ע׳ א׳תסו נמצא הג״ה לכאן.
- 3והלא קערה אחת היתה ומזרק אחד היה וכף אחת היתה ביום המשח אותו · Bamidbar Rabbah 13:9
- 4העלה עליהם כאלו כולם הקריבו ביום ראשון וביום אחרון · Bamidbar Rabbah 14:13
- 5
- 6ובשה״ש ע״פ כולך יפה רעיתי · Shir HaShirim Rabbah 4:7:1
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
Each Rosh Chodesh the names of those learning here are brought to the Ohel. Add your name, and mark what you learn so it is counted.
In one’s avodah
In prayer, set out G‑d’s praises in Pesukei deZimra and the blessings of the Shema with depth of mind, until even the animal soul’s desire for physical pleasure turns into love of G‑d at “One” and “You shall love… with all your heart.” And use permitted things only for the sake of Heaven, so that they are raised into holiness and do not drag one down.
Questions for discussion
- Why is the love of the transformed animal soul called “very good,” more than the G‑dly soul’s own love?
- How does the difference between the Seraphim and the Ofanim explain the special power of the animal soul?
- In what sense is the altar’s “eating” an inner level and the incense an encompassing one?
- Why does every beginning need an extra, encompassing light, and where does the maamar find this pattern?
- How does the distinction between encompassing and inner offerings resolve “on the day it was anointed” and “after it was anointed”?
Key terms in this maamar
- The animal soulנפש הבהמית
- The soul that animates the body and its drives. ×11
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence.
- The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
- G‑d's presence as it dwells in the world.
- Self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh)מסירות נפש
- Giving oneself over entirely to G‑d.
- Delightתענוג
- Pleasure; the inner root of will. ×1
- The sitra achra (the other side)סטרא אחרא
- The realm opposed to holiness.
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- Teshuvah (return)תשובה
- Returning to G‑d; not only repentance.
- The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
- The soul that is 'a part of G‑d above'.
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×12
- The light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin)ממלא כל עלמין
- Divine light that enters each world and gives it life according to its measure.
- The light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin)סובב כל עלמין
- Divine light too great to enter the worlds; it 'surrounds' them and affects them from beyond.
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
- Tzimtzum (contraction)צמצום
- The self-concealment of the Infinite Light that makes room for finite worlds. ×2
- The kav (line of light)קו
- The thin ray of light drawn into the space left after the tzimtzum. ×1
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- An arousal from belowאתערותא דלתתא
- Human initiative that draws down a divine response.
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The innermost core of a level.
- An arousal from aboveאתערותא דלעילא
- Divine initiative, unprompted by us.
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d.
- The outer dimension (chitzoniyus)חיצוניות
- The external, expressive aspect.
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×7
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving. ×1
- Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
- Measure, limitation and judgment. ×1
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×1
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- G‑d as concealed within nature, measuring and limiting. ×3
- Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
- Harmony of kindness and restraint; associated with compassion. ×2
- The reshimu (impression)רשימו
- The trace left after the tzimtzum. ×2