Torah Ohr · Parshas Terumah · Maamar 2
ביאור על הנ״ל
An Explanation of the Above
Biur · an explanation of maamar 1Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
Every Jewish soul is rooted either in Yosef, the higher tzaddik who draws G‑d’s light down to the recipient, or in Binyamin, the lower tzaddik whose self-sacrifice and deeds bind the world to G‑d from below. The Torah study of the one renews the ‘brotherhood’ pleaded for in “Would that you were like a brother to me”; the charity, practical mitzvos and fixed study times of the other carry G‑dliness ‘outside,’ into this world, and reach even the ‘kiss,’ a light above speech.
The maamar in brief
Explaining the preceding maamar on Song of Songs 8:1–2, the Alter Rebbe begins with Isaiah’s “And your people are all righteous”: there are two tzaddikim, Yosef above and Binyamin below, and every soul is rooted in one of them. Yaakov, the supernal emotive attributes as a whole, carries the light from the Infinite down to the supernal speech; Yosef, Yesod, binds the giver to the recipient; Binyamin is the recipient’s self-sacrifice, binding the lower worlds to Atzilus from below, which is why his birth was hard. The same two directions appear in the mitzvos, in two kinds of peace and in the two cherubim. Since the Temple’s destruction, Yosef-souls renew the ‘brotherhood’ with G‑d through the Oral Torah, which reaches the inner dimension of the worlds. Binyamin-souls, occupied with charity and kindness, carry G‑dliness ‘outside,’ into this physical world. Their deeds refine the sparks of Tohu and so draw from Akudim, a level above vessels and above speech: the ‘kiss.’ Because this light is higher than Imma, its recipients are pupils (“you would teach me”), and the effortful fixed times for Torah of people in business draw down ‘spiced wine,’ delight from Atika revealed in Binah.
Outline
- HeadingAn explanation of the preceding maamar, “Would that you were like a brother to me.”¶1
- Two tzaddikim: Yosef and BinyaminYaakov carries the light down to the supernal speech; Yosef (Yesod) binds giver to recipient from above, and Binyamin, the recipient’s self-sacrifice, binds below to above; hence Rachel’s hard labor.¶2–3
- Mitzvos, peace and the cherubimMitzvos that draw down and mitzvos that elevate; two kinds of peace; the two cherubim facing each other; after the Temple’s destruction, Yosef-souls restore the ‘brotherhood’ through the Oral Torah.¶4
- “I would find you outside”Torah study reaches the inner dimension of the worlds; the charity and kindness of Binyamin-souls carry G‑dliness into their outer dimension, down to this world.¶5
- “I would kiss you”: Akudim and TohuLike a kiss that expresses a love too deep for words, the practical mitzvos of Binyamin-souls, refining the sparks of Tohu, draw light from Akudim, above vessels and above speech.¶6
- “I would lead you… you would teach me”This light comes from above Imma, so those who receive it are pupils rather than brothers.¶7
- The spiced wineBalsam oil and spiced wine are Chochmah and Binah carrying a fragrance from Keser and Atika; the spiced wine is drawn down by the fixed times for Torah of people occupied in business.¶8
Key concepts
- The higher tzaddik and the lower tzaddikצדיק עליון וצדיק תחתון
- Yosef and Binyamin: the bond of the giver with the recipient from above (Yesod), and the recipient’s own bond rising from below through self-sacrifice.
- Drawing-down and elevationהמשכה והעלאה
- The two directions of divine service, light drawn from above downward and the lower world raised from below upward; they appear in the mitzvos, in peace and in the two cherubim.
- The inner and outer dimension of the worldsפנימיות וחיצוניות העולמות
- Torah study, through thought and speech, draws G‑dliness into the inner dimension; deeds of charity and kindness carry it into the outer dimension, down to this world.
- Akudimעקודים
- A level of light above investment in vessels. Its lights, like those of Tohu, are above vessels, but there was no shattering in it; the ‘kiss’ is drawn from it.
- Tohu and its refinementsעולם התהו ובירורים
- The world whose vessels shattered; refining its fallen sparks through practical mitzvos raises them and draws down the light of Akudim.
- Fragrance (makif)ריח (מקיף)
- An encompassing quality above vessels: balsam oil and spiced wine are Chochmah and Binah carrying a light from Keser and from Atika.
- Iskafyaאתכפייא
- Subjugation of the self against its own pull; the fixed times for Torah that people occupied in business set with effort draw down the delight of the ‘spiced wine.’
Heading ¶1
This short maamar explains the one before it in Torah Ohr, on the verses “Would that you were like a brother to me” (Song of Songs 8:1–2), which contrasted those who study Torah constantly with people occupied in business, who serve G‑d “outside.” Here the Alter Rebbe grounds that contrast in two roots of souls, Yosef and Binyamin.
A heading: what follows elaborates on the preceding maamar, “Would that you were like a brother to me.”
Marei mekomos
- 1ביאור על הנ״ל · הנחה אחרת בסה״מ תקע״א ע׳ פד (מגוכתי״ק הצ״צ). הנחת כ״ק אדה״א שם ע׳ קז. עוד הנחה נדפס במאמרי אדה״ז כתובים ח״ב ע׳ קפה.
Two tzaddikim: Yosef and Binyamin ¶2–3
2הנה כתיב ועמך כולם צדיקים.1 והנה יוסף נק׳2 צדיק עליון ובנימין נק׳ צדיק תחתון.3 ויש נשמות שהם מבחי׳ יוסף. ויש מבחי׳ בנימין.
Now, it is written, “And your people are all righteous (tzaddikim).” And Yosef is called the higher tzaddik (tzaddik elyon), and Binyamin is called the lower tzaddik (tzaddik tachton). And there are souls that are of the level of Yosef, and there are [souls] of the level of Binyamin.
Isaiah promises that all of Israel are tzaddikim, righteous. The Zohar names Rachel’s two sons as two kinds of tzaddik, Yosef the higher and Binyamin the lower, and every Jewish soul is rooted in one of these two levels.
Because each soul belongs to one of the two tzaddikim, the verse can call the whole people tzaddikim. The higher tzaddik is the link between Atzilus, the world still one with G‑d, and Beriah, the first world of separate existence; the Zohar reads “for all (kol) in heaven and on earth” as the tzaddik, the Sefirah of Yesod, and adds the Targum’s rendering, ‘which holds fast to heaven and earth.’
כי הנה יעקב נק׳ בריח התיכון6 המבריח מן הקצה אל הקצה7 היינו להיות ההמשכה מאא״ס [מאור אין סוף] עד מקור דבי״ע שהוא בחי׳ הדבור עליון שהמשכה זו היא ע״י יעקב שהוא כללות המדות עליונות.
For Yaakov is called “the middle bar, which runs through from end to end,” meaning, that the drawing-down should extend from the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) to the source of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, which is the level of the supernal speech; for this drawing-down comes through Yaakov, who is the supernal emotive attributes (middos) as a whole.
The middle bar of the Mishkan ran through all the boards from one end to the other, and the Zohar identifies it with Yaakov. So the flow of light passes through Yaakov, who holds all the supernal emotive attributes together, from the Infinite Light down to the supernal speech, the divine word that is the source of the lower worlds.
The paragraph introduces the two tzaddikim, Yosef above and Binyamin below, and begins to place them in the flow of divine light: Yaakov, the emotive attributes as a whole, carries the light from the Infinite down to the supernal speech, the source of the lower worlds.
The Zohar that Kehot cites (1:153b) says that Rachel bore two tzaddikim: from the tzaddik above flow the upper waters, and from the tzaddik below the feminine waters rise toward the masculine, while the Shemitah (Malchus) sits between the two. This is the root of the maamar’s pairing of a flow from above downward (Yosef) with an ascent from below upward (Binyamin).
Marei mekomos
- 1ועמך כולם צדיקים · Isaiah 60:21
- 2יוסף נק׳ צ״ע · ראה לקו״ת מסעי צ, ד. פ׳ ראה כה, ד ואילך.
- 3ובנימין נק׳ צדיק תחתון · Zohar I, 153b
- 4כי כל בשמים ובארץ · I Chronicles 29:11
- 5כי כל בשמים ובארץ . . דאחיד בשמיא וארעא · Zohar I, 31a
- 6יעקב נק׳ בריח התיכון · Zohar III, 186a
- 7בריח התיכון המבריח מן הקצה אל הקצה · Exodus 26:28
3וכמו עד״מ שע״י המדות נמשך ההשפעה שכשיש לו אהבה מדבר כו׳. אך אלה תולדות יעקב1 הוא בחי׳ יוסף שהוא בחי׳ יסוד התקשרות של המשפיע עם המקבל וזהו בחי׳ צ״ע [צדיק עליון].
Just as, by way of analogy, it is through the emotive attributes (middos) that the bestowal is drawn forth: when one has love, he speaks, etc. But “these are the generations of Yaakov” is the level of Yosef, which is the level of Yesod (foundation), the bond of the giver with the recipient; and this is the level of the higher tzaddik.
A person’s feelings are what move him to give of himself: when he loves someone, he speaks to him. So too above, the emotive attributes (Yaakov) carry the flow, but the actual link between giver and recipient is Yesod, ‘foundation’: Yosef, whom the verse names as “the generations of Yaakov,” the higher tzaddik.
אך בכדי שיהיה המקבל קולט את ההשפעה צ״ל ג״כ בבחי׳ התקשרות שהוא בעבודת ה׳ בחי׳ מס״נ [מסירות נפש] והוא בחי׳ בנימין צ״ת [צדיק תחתון] שמקשר בריאה באצי׳ מלמטה למעלה.
But in order for the recipient to take in the bestowal, he too must be at the level of bonding, which in the service of G‑d is the level of self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh). And this is the level of Binyamin, the lower tzaddik, who binds Beriah (Creation) with Atzilus (Emanation), from below upward.
Bestowal from above is not enough; the recipient must also bind himself upward, or the flow will not be taken in. In the service of G‑d this is self-sacrifice, giving oneself over entirely, and it is the level of Binyamin, the lower tzaddik, who binds Beriah to Atzilus from below.
ולכן נאמר בלידת בנימין ותקש בלדתה2.3 כי בנימין הוא ההתכללות והבטול מבי״ע לאצי׳ שזהו הפך ענין הלידה והגילוי מלמעלה4 למטה.
Therefore it is said at the birth of Binyamin, “and she had hard labor in giving birth.” For Binyamin is the inclusion and the self-nullification (bittul) of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah into Atzilus, which is the opposite of the matter of birth and revelation from above downward.
Birth is a revelation, a movement from above downward, while Binyamin’s whole nature runs the other way: the self-nullification of the lower worlds and their absorption into Atzilus. That is why Rachel’s labor with him was hard.
Yosef (Yesod) bonds the giver to the recipient from above, while Binyamin, the recipient’s own self-sacrifice, binds the lower worlds to Atzilus from below; Rachel’s hard labor at his birth shows how contrary his nature is to a descent.
Kehot (note 80:57) quotes the Tzemach Tzedek’s transcript of this passage, which explains why the recipient’s self-sacrifice is needed: only an empty vessel can hold, and the recipient’s longing raises ‘feminine waters’ that awaken the giver’s wish to give. So a teacher who sees that his student truly wants his teaching feels a fresh desire to teach, as in the verse “He makes His wind blow, the waters flow”: the wind rising from below, then the waters flowing from above.
Marei mekomos
- 1אלה תולדות יעקב · Genesis 37:2
- 2
- 3ותקש בלדתה · Genesis 35:16
- 4למעלה — כי בנימין . . והגילוי מלמעלה למטה · בהנחת כ״ק אדמו״ר הצ״צ: ”ובנימין הוא צדיק תחתון שהוא התקשרות המקבל אל המשפיע ועפ״י חסידות הוא בחי׳ מס״נ שהוא העלא׳ ממטה למעלה שעי״ז יכול להיות ההשפעה נגבלת אצל המקבל (כי כלי ריקן דוקא מחזיק וגם הוא העלא׳ מ״ן לעורר הרצון במשפיע להשפיע ד״מ בגשמיות כשהרב רואה שיש חפץ בהתלמיד לשפעו נתעורר בו רצון וחשק להשפיע וכענין מ״ש ישב רוחו יזלו מים פי׳ ישב רוחו ממטה למעלה העלא׳ מ״ן אזי יזלו מים ממעלה למטה)”.
Mitzvos, peace and the cherubim ¶4
4והנה במצות מעשיות יש ג״כ שני הבחי׳ יש מצות שהן בחי׳ המשכת האור מלמעלה למטה כמו שופר לולב סוכה ציצית ותפלין
Now, in the practical mitzvos there are also these two levels: there are mitzvos that are the level of drawing the light from above downward, such as shofar, lulav, sukkah, tzitzis and tefillin.
The same two directions, down from above and up from below, appear among the mitzvos performed in deed. Some of them, shofar, lulav, sukkah, tzitzis and tefillin, draw divine light down from above.
ויש שהן בחי׳ העלאות כמו קרבנות וראשית הגז כו׳.
And there are those that are the level of elevations, such as the sacrifices and the first of the shearing, etc.
Other mitzvos are ‘elevations,’ in which something from below is raised up to G‑d, such as the sacrifices and the gift of the first shearing of the sheep to the kohen.
וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] ורב שלום בניך.1 שלום הוא בחי׳ התקשרות והתחברות משפיע ומקבל. ויש ב׳ בחי׳ שלום מלמעלה למטה ע״י יוסף. ומלמטה למעלה ע״י בנימין.
And this is [the meaning of] what is written, “and great shall be the peace of your children.” Peace is the level of the bonding and joining of giver and recipient. And there are two levels of peace: from above downward, through Yosef, and from below upward, through Binyamin.
Isaiah’s “great shall be the peace of your children” is read in this light. Peace means the bond between giver and recipient, and it comes in two forms: the flow from above, through Yosef, and the ascent from below, through Binyamin.
אך הבחי׳ שע״י יוסף נק׳ ורב שלום כו׳. וזהו ג״כ ענין כרוב א׳ מקצה מזה2 הוא בחי׳ יוסף שממשיך מלמעלה למטה מאא״ס [מאור אין סוף] לבחי׳ הדבור כו׳.
But the level that comes through Yosef is called “and great shall be the peace,” etc. And this is also the matter of “one cherub from the end on this side”: it is the level of Yosef, who draws from above downward, from the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) to the level of speech, etc.
Of the two, the peace that comes through Yosef is the one the verse calls “great peace.” The two cherubim on the Ark, one at each end, also stand for the two tzaddikim, and the first of them is Yosef, who draws the Infinite Light down as far as the level of the supernal speech.
וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] ביוסף והוא נער3 כו׳ שהוא בחי׳ כרוב כרביא.4 (וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] בזוהר פ׳ וישב )(בדף קפ״ד) מי יתנך כאח לי5 כו׳. כיוסף על אחוי6 כו׳.
And this is [the meaning of] what is written of Yosef, “and he was a lad,” etc., for he is the level of the cherub (keruv), ‘like a child’ (ke-ravya). (And this is what is said in the Zohar, Parshas Vayeshev, on folio 184): “Would that you were like a brother to me,” etc.: ‘like Yosef toward his brothers,’ etc.
The Torah calls Yosef a “lad,” and the Sages explain the word keruv, cherub, as ke-ravya, ‘like a child’; so Yosef is the cherub. The Zohar on Parshas Vayeshev reads “Would that you were like a brother to me” as Knesses Yisrael’s plea that G‑d be to her ‘like Yosef toward his brothers,’ whom he fed and sustained in the famine.
וכרוב א׳ מקצה מזה הוא בחי׳ בנימין שהוא התקשרות המקבל מלמטה למעלה.
And “one cherub from the end on that side” is the level of Binyamin, which is the bonding of the recipient from below upward.
The second cherub, “from the end on that side,” is Binyamin: the recipient’s bond, rising from below.
ופניהם איש אל אחיו7 התחברות שניהם כו׳. אך משחרב בהמ״ק [בית המקדש] מבקשת כנ״י [כנסת ישראל] מי יתנך כאח לי.
And “their faces, each toward his brother” is the joining of the two, etc. But since the Holy Temple (Beis HaMikdash) was destroyed, the Congregation of Israel (Knesses Yisrael) pleads, “Would that you were like a brother to me.”
The cherubim’s faces turned “each toward his brother” are the joining of the two directions, the flow from above meeting the ascent from below. Since the Temple was destroyed this joining is no longer revealed, so Knesses Yisrael pleads for G‑d to be “like a brother” once more.
והיינו ע״י יונק שדי אמי עסק התושבע״פ [התורה שבעל פה] כו׳ וכנ״ל. אך זהו ע״י הנשמות ששרשן מבחי׳ יוסף צ״ע [צדיק עליון] כו׳ שנק׳ אחים למקום.
That is, through “nursing at my mother’s breasts,” occupation with the Oral Torah, etc., as mentioned above. But this is through the souls whose root is of the level of Yosef, the higher tzaddik, etc., who are called ‘brothers’ to the Omnipresent.
As the preceding maamar explained, this brotherhood is renewed now through “nursing at my mother’s breasts,” the study of the Oral Torah. Such study belongs to the souls rooted in Yosef, the higher tzaddik, and they are the ones called ‘brothers’ to G‑d.
The mitzvos, the two kinds of peace and the two cherubim all mirror the pair Yosef and Binyamin: the flow from above and the bond from below. After the Temple’s destruction, the ‘brotherhood’ Knesses Yisrael longs for is renewed through the Oral Torah studied by souls of Yosef’s level.
In a second reading, the Zohar passage cited here (1:184a) applies the whole verse to Yosef: “like a brother” is Yosef united with the Shechinah; “nursing at my mother’s breasts,” for then there is brotherhood and wholeness; “I would find you outside,” in exile, in a foreign land; and “I would kiss you,” to cleave spirit to spirit. The maamar’s next paragraphs take up “outside” and “I would kiss you.”
Marei mekomos
- 1ורב שלום בניך · Isaiah 54:13
- 2כרוב א׳ מקצה מזה · Exodus 25:19
- 3והוא נער · Genesis 37:2
- 4כרוב כרביא · Chagigah 13b:6–7
- 5מי יתנך כאח לי · Song of Songs 8:1
- 6כיוסף על אחוי · Zohar, Vayeshev 10:102–12:112
- 7ופניהם איש אל אחיו · Exodus 25:20
“I would find you outside” ¶5
5והנה המשכה זו עיקרה הוא בפנימיות העולמות כיון שעיקר ההמשכה ע״י מחשבה ודבור בעסק התורה אך כדי שיהיה ההמשכה גם בחיצוניות העולמות ע״ז נאמר אמצאך בחוץ.1
Now, this drawing-down is chiefly in the inner dimension (pnimiyus) of the worlds, since the drawing-down comes chiefly through thought and speech in occupation with the Torah. But for the drawing-down to be in the outer dimension (chitzoniyus) of the worlds as well, of this it is said, “I would find you outside.”
Torah study works through thought and speech, so the light it draws down reaches mainly the inner dimension of the worlds. For it to reach their outer dimension as well, the verse continues, “I would find you outside.”
והוא ע״י נשמות שמבחי׳ בנימין שרוב עסקיהם במעשה דוקא בצדקה וגמ״ח [וגמילות חסדים] שעי״ז נמשך גם בעוה״ז השפל. (ע׳ [עיין] באגה״ק [באגרת הקודש] ד״ה ויעש דוד שם):2
And this is through souls of the level of Binyamin, most of whose occupation is specifically in deed, in charity and acts of kindness (gemilus chassadim), through which [the light] is drawn down also into this lowly world. (See Iggeres HaKodesh, the section beginning “And David made a name.”)
That outward reach comes through souls of Binyamin’s level, whose service is mostly in deed, especially charity and acts of kindness; through these, the light reaches even this lowly physical world. The text refers the reader to the Alter Rebbe’s letter in Iggeres HaKodesh that opens with “And David made a name,” on the power of charity.
Torah study by Yosef-souls draws G‑dliness into the inner dimension of the worlds; the deeds of Binyamin-souls, charity and kindness, carry it into their outer dimension, down to this physical world.
Iggeres HaKodesh 5, to which the text refers, opens with the Zohar’s teaching that one who gives charity to the poor ‘makes the holy Name’ every day. It goes on to explain that this lowly world receives its life not from the inner form of the letters of divine speech, as souls and angels do, but from their outer ‘body,’ the breath (hevel) signified by the letter hei. It then cites the Arizal’s two kinds of souls: the Torah study of scholars draws the light to the souls in Beriah and the angels in Yetzirah, but only those who spend most of their days in charity and kindness draw it down into this lowly world.
Marei mekomos
- 1אמצאך בחוץ · Song of Songs 8:1
- 2ויעש דוד שם · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 5:1
“I would kiss you”: Akudim and Tohu ¶6
6והנה פי׳ אשקך נשיקין אתדבקות רוחא ברוחא.1 הענין דכמו עד״מ הנשיקים גשמיים באדם שהם באים ונמשכים מחמת פנימית אהבה שבלב שאינה מתלבשת בשום כלי כו׳
Now, the meaning of “I would kiss you” is kisses, ‘the cleaving of spirit to spirit.’ The explanation: just as, by way of analogy, the physical kisses of a person come and are drawn forth from the inwardness of the love that is in the heart, which is not invested in any vessel, etc.
The Zohar explains “I would kiss you” as the cleaving of spirit to spirit. A physical kiss comes from a love so inward that it cannot be put into any vessel; it is too deep for words.
(שאותיות הדבור שהם בחי׳ כלים להמדות אין יכולים להכיל אהבה רבה זו לכך אינה מתלבשת בדבור רק בבחי׳ נשיקין)
(for the letters of speech, which are the level of vessels for the emotive attributes (middos), cannot contain this great love; therefore it is not invested in speech, only in the level of kisses),
The parenthesis explains why: the letters of speech are the vessels through which feelings are expressed, but they cannot contain so great a love, so it is expressed only in a kiss.
כך ענין ההמשכה זו שע״י קיום המצות מעשיות דנשמות שמבחי׳ בנימין ממשיכים מבחי׳ עקודים2 שהוא למעלה מבחי׳ ההתלבשות בכלים כי רק באצי׳ שייך בחי׳ כלים אלא דאיהו וגרמוהי חד3 כו׳ משא״כ בבחי׳ עקודים.
so too is the matter of this drawing-down: through the fulfillment of the practical mitzvos by souls of the level of Binyamin, they draw down from the level of Akudim, which is above the level of investment in vessels. For only in Atzilus (Emanation) does the level of vessels apply, except that [there] “He and His vessels (ihu vegarmohi) are one,” etc.; which is not so in the level of Akudim.
In the same way, the practical mitzvos done by Binyamin-souls draw light from Akudim, a level where the lights are ‘bound’ together, above being invested in vessels. Investment in vessels begins only with Atzilus, and even there “He and His vessels are one”; in Akudim there is no such investment at all. The Tzemach Tzedek (Or HaTorah) ties this to Etz Chaim, where the Akudim are lights that issue from the mouth of Adam Kadmon, the primordial configuration of light.
והיינו משום שעל ידי ההעלאות דבנימין מבירורים דעולם התהו ששם ג״כ האורות למעלה מההתלבשות בכלים אלא ששם היה שבה״כ [שבירת הכלים]. משא״כ בעולם העקודים כו׳.
That is because [this comes] through the elevations of Binyamin, from the refinements (beirurim) of the World of Tohu, where the lights were likewise above investment in vessels, except that there, there was the shattering of the vessels (sheviras hakeilim), which is not so in the World of Akudim, etc.
The reason is that Binyamin’s elevations raise the sparks refined from the World of Tohu (‘chaos’), whose lights were likewise above investment in vessels; but in Tohu the vessels could not hold the lights and shattered, as they did not in Akudim.
ועל ידי בירורים הנ״ל ממשיכים מבחי׳ העקודים. וזהו בחי׳ הנשיקין שהוא בחי׳ שלמעלה מהדבור4 כו׳.
And through the refinements mentioned above they draw down from the level of Akudim. And this is the level of kisses, which is the level that is above speech, etc.
By refining and raising the sparks of Tohu, Binyamin-souls draw light from Akudim, and that is the ‘kiss’: a level above speech, as the love in a kiss is beyond words.
(ועמ״ש גבי קי״ס [קריעת ים סוף] בענין ואתם תחרישון5 כו׳ כי הדבור שרשו מחכמה כו׳ ע״ש בפ׳ בשלח6 בד״ה וה׳ הולך לפניהם7 כו׳ ומשם יובן יותר מ״ש):
(And see what is written regarding the Splitting of the Sea of Reeds, on the matter of “and you shall be silent,” etc., that speech has its root in Chochmah (wisdom), etc.; see there, in Parshas Beshalach, in the discourse beginning “And Havayah went before them,” etc.; and from there what is written [here] will be understood better.)
The text refers to the Alter Rebbe’s discourse on Parshas Beshalach, which explains that at the Splitting of the Sea Israel was told “you shall be silent,” because speech has its root in Chochmah while what was revealed then was higher. That explanation helps show why the ‘kiss’ stands above speech.
The ‘kiss’ of the verse is the light that the practical mitzvos of Binyamin-souls draw from Akudim, a level above vessels and above speech; it is within their reach because their deeds refine the sparks of Tohu, whose lights were also above vessels.
Kehot (note 80:61) quotes Or HaTorah, which links this to Etz Chaim, Sha’ar HaAkudim, chapter 1: the Akudim are lights that issue from the mouth of Adam Kadmon, and the level of ‘kisses’ is a union of Chochmah, Binah and Daas with Chochmah, Binah and Daas.
Marei mekomos
- 1אשקך נשיקין אתדבקות רוחא ברוחא · Zohar, Vayeshev 10:102–12:112
- 2בבחי׳ נשיקין . . ממשיכים מבחי׳ עקודים · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ כב מציין: ”והיינו כמ״ש בע״ח שער העקודים פ״א שהם אורות היוצאים מפה דא״ק דהיינו כי בחי׳ נשיקין היינו זיווג חב״ד בחב״ד”.
- 3דאיהו וגרמוהי חד · Tikkunei Zohar 3b:9–10
- 4בחי׳ הנשיקין שהוא בחי׳ שלמעלה מהדבור · ראה אוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ כד ושם מציין ”וכ״מ בהרמ״ז פ׳ בראשית בדף ד׳ סע״ב”. ע״ש.
- 5ואתם תחרישון · Exodus 14:14
- 6בפ׳ בשלח · לעיל סה, א.
- 7וה׳ הולך לפניהם · Exodus 13:21
“I would lead you… you would teach me” ¶7
7וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] אנהגך אביאך אל בית אמי.1 כי כאן ההמשכה גבוה מבחי׳ אימא עלאה רק שאח״כ מתלבשת באימא. משא״כ לעיל אמר יונק שדי אמי.2
And this is [the meaning of] what is written, “I would lead you, I would bring you into my mother’s house.” For here the drawing-down is higher than the level of Imma Ila’ah (the supernal Mother); only afterwards is it invested in Imma. Whereas above it said, “nursing at my mother’s breasts.”
The next verse, “I would lead you, I would bring you into my mother’s house,” describes this higher light. It comes from above Imma Ila’ah, the supernal Binah (‘my mother’), and only afterward is it clothed in Imma, ‘my mother’s house’; earlier the verse said “nursing at my mother’s breasts,” drawing from Imma itself.
וגם כאן אמר תלמדני שנעשים בחי׳ מקבל בלבד מהמשכה זאת ולא בחי׳ כאח לי.
And here it also says, “you would teach me,” for they become only the level of a recipient from this drawing-down, and not the level of “like a brother to me.”
Nursing from Imma itself let the Torah scholar be “like a brother”; here the verse adds “you would teach me”: from this higher light one is only a recipient, a pupil, not a brother on an equal footing.
לפי שמבחי׳ עליונה כזו א״א להיות אלא מקבל בלבד כענין ודברי אשר שמתי בפיך3 כו׳.
For from so lofty a level it is impossible to be anything but a recipient alone, as in the matter of “and My words which I have put in your mouth,” etc.
So lofty a source leaves room only to receive, as in the words of Isaiah, “My words which I have put in your mouth”: words placed in one’s mouth from above.
The second verse, “I would lead you… you would teach me,” reflects the higher source of what the Binyamin-souls draw down: it comes from above Imma, so those who receive it are pupils rather than brothers.
The preceding maamar offered this as a second reading of “I would lead you,” after first explaining the verse as the fixed times for Torah study set by people occupied in business.
Marei mekomos
- 1אנהגך אביאך אל בית אמי · Song of Songs 8:2
- 2יונק שדי אמי · Song of Songs 8:1
- 3ודברי אשר שמתי בפיך · Isaiah 59:21
The spiced wine ¶8
8וענין יין הרקח1 הוא ע״ד שנזכר בגמ׳ [בגמרא] תליסר נהרא דאפרסמונא דכיא שרומז לאור ההמשכה מי״ג ת״ד [תיקוני דיקנא] דנפקי ממו״ס [ממוחא סתימאה].4
And the matter of “the spiced wine” is along the lines of what is mentioned in the Gemara, ‘thirteen rivers of pure balsam,’ which alludes to the light of the drawing-down from the thirteen tikkunim of the beard (tikkunei dikna), which issue from Mocha Stima’ah (the hidden brain).
The Talmud tells that Rabbi Elazar ben Pedas was promised, in the World to Come, thirteen rivers of pure balsam oil. These allude to light drawn from the thirteen tikkunim of the beard, channels of the thirteen attributes of mercy, which issue from Mocha Stima’ah, the hidden brain. Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim, explains these rivers as a level higher than plain oil, and therefore fragrant, and refers back to this passage.
אע״ג [אף על גב] דשמן סתם הוא בחי׳ חכמה. אבל שמן אפרסמון שיש בו ריח טוב שהוא בחי׳ מקיף רומז לבחי׳ ההמשכות מבחי׳ חכמה שבכתר שלמעלה מבחי׳ כלים. (ועמ״ש פ׳ נשא בד״ה זאת חנוכת המזבח2 ביום המשח אתו).3
Although plain oil is the level of Chochmah (wisdom), yet balsam oil, which has a pleasant fragrance, which is the level of the encompassing [light] (makif), alludes to the level of the drawings-down from the level of Chochmah within Keser (the Crown), which is above the level of vessels. (And see what is written in Parshas Nasso, in the discourse beginning “This was the dedication of the altar on the day it was anointed.”)
Plain oil stands for Chochmah, but balsam oil has fragrance, and fragrance is a makif, an encompassing quality that is sensed rather than taken in; so it alludes to the flows from Chochmah within Keser, a level above vessels. The text refers to the discourse on Parshas Nasso, which, as the Kehot note suggests, is Likkutei Torah’s explanation of the anointing oil, blended with spices, as midway between the inner and the encompassing.
ועד״ז ג״כ בבחי׳ יין דיין סתם זהו בחי׳ בינה. אבל יין הרקח שיש בו ריח הוא בחי׳ התגלות התענוג בבינה מבחי׳ עתיקא כו׳
Wine follows the same pattern as oil: plain wine stands for Binah, and spiced wine, which has fragrance too, is the revelation within Binah of delight from Atika, the innermost level of Keser.
וזה נמשך ע״י אתכפייא של קביעות עתים לתורה של הבעלי עסקים וכמש״ל [וכמה שכתוב לעיל]:
And this is drawn down through the subjugation (iskafya) involved in the setting of fixed times for Torah by those occupied in business, as explained above.
The delight of the spiced wine is drawn down through the iskafya, the effortful self-mastery, of people occupied in business who set fixed times for Torah study, as the preceding maamar explained.
As balsam oil is Chochmah carrying the fragrance of Keser, so spiced wine is Binah carrying a revelation of delight from Atika; and this is drawn down by the effortful fixed times for Torah study of people occupied in business.
The two pairs, plain oil and balsam oil, plain wine and spiced wine, share one structure: a liquid that is taken in, an inner light, which also carries fragrance, an encompassing light. The Likkutei Torah passage on Nasso that Kehot suggests describes the anointing oil in the same terms, as midway between the inner and the encompassing.
Marei mekomos
- 1יין הרקח · Song of Songs 8:2
- 2בד״ה זאת חנוכת המזבח · אולי הכוונה ללקו״ת נשא כט, ב שענין שמן המשחה הוא תערובת בחי׳ פנימי ומקיף.
- 3זאת חנוכת המזבח ביום המשח אתו · Numbers 7:84
- 4שנזכר בגמרא תליסר נהרא · Taanit 25a
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
Each Rosh Chodesh the names of those learning here are brought to the Ohel. Add your name, and mark what you learn so it is counted.
In one’s avodah
A recipient takes in G‑d’s flow only by binding himself upward in self-sacrifice, as Binyamin does. And one occupied in business is not lesser for it: his charity and acts of kindness carry G‑dliness into this physical world, his practical mitzvos refine the sparks of Tohu and draw a light above speech, and the fixed times he sets for Torah study with effort draw down the delight of the ‘spiced wine.’
Questions for discussion
- Why must the recipient, and not only the giver, be in a state of bonding for the flow to be taken in?
- How does Rachel’s hard labor at Binyamin’s birth illustrate the difference between Yosef and Binyamin?
- Why does Torah study reach mainly the inner dimension of the worlds, while charity and kindness reach their outer dimension?
- How can deeds that refine the sparks of Tohu draw down a light higher than speech, the ‘kiss’?
- Why does receiving from a higher source make one a pupil (“you would teach me”) rather than a brother?
Key terms in this maamar
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d.
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence. ×2
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of the angels and emotions.
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one.
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×3
- Yesod (foundation)יסוד
- The channel that connects and transmits. ×1
- Self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh)מסירות נפש
- Giving oneself over entirely to G‑d.
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d.
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The innermost core of a level. ×1
- The outer dimension (chitzoniyus)חיצוניות
- The external, expressive aspect. ×1
- “He and His vessels” (ihu vegarmohi)איהו וגרמוהי
- From the Tikkunei Zohar: in Atzilus the Light and the vessels are one. Always “vessels”, never “organs”, “causations” or “bones”. Its companion איהו וחיוהי is “He and His life-forces”. Not מגרמיה (“of itself”). ×1
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×3
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×1
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×2
- Delightתענוג
- Pleasure; the inner root of will. ×1
- The general and collective expression (klalus)כללות
- That which encompasses the particulars as one: their general and collective expression (the klal, as against the prat). Never “sum”, “sum total”, “totality” or “general principle”, as if the particulars were added up (וכללותן היא מצות הצדקה is “their general and collective expression is the mitzvah of charity”). Render by sense: “their general and collective expression”, “that which encompasses them all”, “X in general”, “X as a whole”. Keep התכללות as “inclusion” / “inter-inclusion”. ×1