Torah Ohr · Parshas Mikeitz · Maamar 4
ת״ר מצות נר חנוכה כו׳
The Rabbis taught: the mitzvah of the Chanukah lamp… Beis Shammai say…
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
The mitzvos are the soul’s garments and the soul is the wick that lets G‑d’s light catch them. Chanukah’s lights, like the eight “princes of men,” draw an encompassing light from above wisdom that must be built up from below step by step; that is why Beis Hillel’s rule, ascending from one to eight, prevails.
The maamar in brief
The maamar asks why Beis Shammai model the Chanukah lights on the decreasing bullocks of Sukkos. It first explains that the mitzvos become the soul’s garments in Gan Eden: a created soul can grasp the radiance of the Shechinah, which is G‑dliness itself, only through a screen, and the mitzvos, rooted in Keser yet performed with physical things, are that screen. Two images follow. The two kinds of mirror, clear glass and a silvered mirror, correspond to Moshe’s prophecy and that of the other prophets, and to the mitzvos and the transformed animal soul, whose “reflected light” reaches even higher. In the lamp, the mitzvos are the oil and the soul is the wick; the dark light of love “with all your might” comes first, then the white light of the mitzvah’s joy. The Menorah’s seven lamps match the seven shepherds, who teach and give inward light; Chanukah’s eight match the eight princes, perfectly righteous people who give encompassing light from a higher source. Against Greek wisdom, the repair had to come from above wisdom. Sukkos, a Torah festival, reveals its light from above all at once and then decreases; Chanukah, a rabbinic light drawn from below, must grow from one.
Outline
- The question, and the mitzvos as garmentsWhy compare the Chanukah lights to the Sukkos bullocks? The mitzvos are the soul’s garments in Gan Eden, where it ascends endlessly in grasping the Infinite.¶1–5
- Why the soul needs a garmentA finite soul receives infinite radiance only through a screen; the mitzvos, rooted in Keser and performed physically, are that screen and the purpose of the soul’s descent.¶6–13
- The two mirrorsClear glass and a silvered mirror: Moshe’s prophecy and the other prophets’; the transformed animal soul produces a reflected light that draws from Atik, above the mitzvos’ root.¶14–20
- Garments, crowns and the lampG‑dliness is above spirit as much as matter; the radiance and the crown; in the lamp the mitzvos are the oil and the soul the wick, giving a dark light and a white light.¶21–29
- Seven shepherds and eight princesThe Menorah’s seven lamps are the shepherds who teach inwardly; Chanukah’s eight are the princes whose encompassing light, from above wisdom, overcomes Greek wisdom and shines even in exile.¶30–42
- Beis Shammai and Beis HillelSukkos, a Torah festival, reveals its light from above at once and decreases; Chanukah, drawn from below, must increase. Accepting the yoke of Heaven and refining the animal soul come first.¶43–48
- The roots of the shepherds and princesThe princes are the outer dimension of a higher level, rooted in the first eight tikkunim of Arich Anpin and in Binah, above the shattering; hence their power against evil.¶49–55
Key concepts
- Garments of the soulלבושי הנשמה
- The mitzvos a person performs become garments through which the soul, in Gan Eden, can receive the radiance of the Shechinah, which it could not otherwise grasp.
- Luminous speculum and speculum that does not shineאספקלריא המאירה ושאינה מאירה
- Clear glass that shows the thing itself, and a silvered mirror that shows only an image but also lets one see oneself and what is behind; applied to prophecy, to the mitzvos, and to the transformed animal soul.
- Wick and oilפתילה ושמן
- In this world the soul is the wick on which G‑d’s light takes hold and the mitzvos are the oil it consumes; in Gan Eden the roles reverse.
- Seven shepherds and eight princes of menשבעה רועים ושמונה נסיכי אדם
- The shepherds teach and give inward light, like the Menorah’s seven lamps; the princes are perfectly righteous and give encompassing light from a higher source, like Chanukah’s eight lights.
- Encompassing and inner lightsמקיפים ופנימיים
- Inner light is absorbed and understood; encompassing light is too great to enter and affects one from beyond, and comes from a higher level.
- With all your mightבכל מאדך
- Love beyond one’s natural measure, born of transforming the animal soul, which draws a light that does not follow the ordered chain of worlds.
The question, and the mitzvos as garments ¶1–5
1ת״ר מצות נר חנוכה12 כו׳. בש״א יום ראשון מדליק ח׳ מכאן ואילך פוחת והולך (כמו בפרי החג). ובה״א יום ראשון מדליק א׳ מכאן ואילך מוסיף והולך (מעלין בקודש כו׳).
The Rabbis taught: “The mitzvah of the Chanukah lamp, etc.” Beis Shammai say: on the first day one lights eight; from then on one goes on decreasing (like the bullocks of the Festival). And Beis Hillel say: on the first day one lights one; from then on one goes on increasing (“we ascend in holiness,” etc.).
The maamar opens with the Talmud’s dispute over how to light the Chanukah lights. Beis Shammai count down from eight, as the bullocks offered on Sukkos decrease each day; Beis Hillel count up from one, because in matters of holiness one only goes upward.
להבין מה ענין נר חנוכה לפרי החג3 נקדים מ״ש נר מצוה ותורה אור4 שהמצות נק׳ נר5 וגם כתיב נר ה׳ נשמת אדם6 שהנשמה נק׳ נר.
To understand what the Chanukah lamp has to do with the bullocks of the Festival, let us first preface what is written, “For a mitzvah is a lamp and the Torah is light”: the mitzvos are called a lamp. And it is also written, “The soul of man is the lamp of G‑d”: the soul is called a lamp.
Beis Shammai’s comparison raises a question: what do Chanukah lights have to do with the Sukkos offerings? To answer, the Alter Rebbe first examines two verses that call something a “lamp”: the mitzvah (Proverbs 6) and the human soul (Proverbs 20).
ובזוהר מבואר7 שהמצות נק׳ לבושין אשר הנשמה מתלבשת בהן בג״ע וצריכה הנשמה לקיים תרי״ג מצות8 בכדי שיהיה המלבוש בשלימות
And in the Zohar it is explained that the mitzvos are called garments, in which the soul clothes itself in Gan Eden; and the soul must fulfill the 613 mitzvos so that the garment will be complete.
The Zohar teaches that the mitzvos a person performs become the soul’s garments in Gan Eden, the spiritual paradise where souls enjoy G‑dliness after this life. Since the soul has 613 “limbs” matching the 613 mitzvos, it needs all of them for its garment to be whole.
ואם חסר א׳ מהמצות חסר לבושו לכן צריכה לבא עוד לקיים המצוה ההיא שחסרה בכדי להשלים המלבוש.9
And if one of the mitzvos is lacking, its garment is lacking. Therefore it must come [down] again to fulfill that mitzvah which was lacking, in order to complete the garment.
A missing mitzvah leaves a gap in the soul’s garment. That is why a soul may need to return to this world: to perform the mitzvah it lacked and so complete its garment.
The paragraph poses the maamar’s question (how Chanukah lights relate to the Sukkos bullocks) and lays its first foundation: the mitzvos are the soul’s garments in Gan Eden, and the garment must be complete.
Tanya (chapter 4) speaks of the G‑dly soul’s three garments, thought, speech and action of the 613 mitzvos; Iggeres HaKodesh 29 develops the garments of Gan Eden made from the mitzvos. The image of both mitzvah and soul as a “lamp” prepares the later idea that the mitzvah is the vessel and the soul the flame.
Marei mekomos
- 1ת״ר מצות נר חנוכה · הנחת הר״פ בס׳ הנחות הר״פ ע׳ קכב. בכותרת שבת חנוכה תקע״א. חלק בסה״מ תרל״ב ע׳ פ. וע׳ צז. הנחה אחרת בסה״מ תקע״א ע׳ כב. באוה״ת במדבר כרך ד ע׳ א׳תצ (ובהוצאה שני׳ בהוספות לפ׳ בהעלותך ע׳ 41) נמצא חלק מהמאמר עם הוספת הגהות מכ״ק הצ״צ. ושם מתחיל הד״ה לא כן עבדי משה [[שם המאמר נחלק לג׳ סעיפים]. ראה לעיל בציונים לכ״ק אדמו״ר זי״ע. לכללות מאמר זה ראה אוה״ת נ״ך כרך א ע׳ תקעז. ד״ה ת״ר מצות נר חנוכה תשל״ח (נדפס בסה״מ מלוקט ח״ב ע׳ יז ואילך).
- 2ת״ר מצות נר חנוכה · Shabbat 21b:8–9
- 3מה ענין נר חנוכה לפרי החג · ראה אוה״ת חנוכה כרך ה תתקמב, ב. ד״ה מצותה תרנ״ד ע׳ צז. ד״ה ת״ר מצות נר חנוכה תשל״ח.
- 4נר מצוה ותורה אור · Proverbs 6:23
- 5שהמצות נק׳ נר · ראה אוה״ת נ״ך כרך א ע׳ תקעו.
- 6נר ה׳ נשמת אדם · Proverbs 20:27
- 7ובזוהר מבואר · Zohar II, 210a
- 8וצריכה הנשמה לקיים תרי״ג מצות · ראה אגה״ק סי׳ יט וסי׳ כט. ובליקוט פירושים ומ״מ — חיטריק לשם.
- 9בית שמאי אומרים · ראה בארוכה בשיטת ב״ש בלקוטי שיחות ח״ו ע׳ 73.
And to explain the matter of the soul’s garment in Gan Eden: Now, in Gan Eden the souls take pleasure in the radiance of the Shechinah, and the radiance is a glow from the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof).
To explain why the soul needs a garment, the Alter Rebbe describes what happens in Gan Eden. The souls’ reward is to enjoy the “radiance of the Shechinah,” and that radiance is itself a glow of the Infinite Light.
ומתענגים הנשמות בג״ע שמשיגים איזה הארה מהזיו ובחי׳ הזיו הוא הארה מא״ס בלי גבול. ולכן אף שבכלל יש רק ב׳ בחי׳.2 גע״ע בבריאה. וגע״ת ביצירה.
Because the radiance comes from the Infinite, the pleasure of grasping it has no limit. In general terms there are just two Gardens of Eden: a higher one in the World of Beriah and a lower one in the World of Yetzirah.
אבל בפרטיות יש השגות בלי גבול צדיקים ילכו מחיל אל חיל3 אשר נשמתם נתעלו בעילוי אחר עילוי כי אין מספר להשגות אור וזיו אשר היא הארה מאור א״ס ב״ה.
in detail there are apprehensions without limit: the righteous “go from strength to strength,” for their souls ascend from one elevation to another, since there is no number to the apprehensions of the light and radiance, which is a glow from the Infinite Light, blessed be He.
Within those two there are endless gradations of understanding. The verse “they go from strength to strength” describes souls that keep rising, because there is no end to what can be grasped of an infinite light.
וכל זמן שצריכה הנשמה להתעלות מג״ע לחבירו צ״ל מקודם בחינת נהר די נור4 שיבוטלו כל השגות הקודמות (עיין בד״ה ויהי מקץ)5
And whenever the soul must ascend from one Gan Eden to the next, there must first be the level of the River of Fire (nehar di nur), so that all its previous apprehensions are nullified (see the discourse beginning “Vayehi Mikeitz”).
Before a soul can rise to a higher level of Gan Eden, it passes through the “River of Fire” (described in the Zohar), which makes it forget its earlier understanding. The text refers to the maamar “Vayehi Mikeitz” at the start of this parsha, where this is discussed.
כי השגה הקודמת נגד השגה שלמעלה ממנה אין ערוך כלל והיא בטלה לגמרי נגדה אחרי שהשגות הנ״ל הוא להיות משיג הארה מאור א״ס ב״ה א״כ כל השגה יתירה שמשיג מהאור השגה שלמטה בטלה נגדה.
For the previous apprehension, compared to the apprehension above it, bears no comparison at all and is entirely nullified before it. Since these apprehensions are the apprehending of a glow from the Infinite Light, blessed be He, it follows that before every further apprehension one attains of the light, the apprehension below it is nullified.
The reason is that a lower understanding is as nothing compared with a higher one. Each new grasp of the Infinite Light dwarfs the previous one so completely that the former must be set aside.
The paragraph describes the soul’s delight in Gan Eden as an endless ascent, each level eclipsing the last, because what it grasps is a glow of the Infinite.
The two Gardens, Higher in Beriah and Lower in Yetzirah, follow the Kabbalistic map of the worlds. The River of Fire (nehar di nur, from Daniel 7:10 and the Zohar) serves here not as punishment but as a purification that frees the soul from its previous level so it can receive the next.
Marei mekomos
- 1בג״ע הנשמות נהנין מזיו השכינה · ראה לעיל טז, א.
- 2אף שבכלל יש רק ב׳ בחי׳ · ראה גם לקמן מט, א. צו, א. לקו״ת במדבר יח, א.
- 3ילכו מחיל אל חיל · Psalms 84:8
- 4בבחינת נהר די נור · Zohar II, 211b
- 5בד״ה ויהי מקץ · לעיל לא, א.
3ולבעבור זה כל צדיק נכוה מחופתו של חבירו.1 היינו מבחינת השגה החופף על חבירו מאחר שאין השגתן א׳ ויש לכל א׳ השגה אחרת אשר נהנה מזיו השכינה המאיר עליו.
For this reason “every tzaddik is burned by the canopy of his fellow,” that is, by the level of apprehension that hovers over his fellow; since their apprehension is not one, and each has a different apprehension, in which he enjoys the radiance of the Shechinah that shines upon him.
The Talmud says each tzaddik is “burned” by his fellow’s canopy in the World to Come. The Alter Rebbe explains this as the pain of seeing a level of understanding above one’s own, since each soul enjoys its own distinct glimpse of the Shechinah.
וזהו וקדושים בכל יום יהללוך סלה2 קדושים היינו נשמות בג״ע נקראו קדושים יהללוך סלה כל מקום שנאמר סלה3 הוא בחי׳ בלי גבול אשר תמיד מתחדשים השגתם מאור א״ס אשר היא בלי גבול.
And this is [the meaning of] “And holy ones every day praise You, selah.” “Holy ones” are the souls in Gan Eden, who are called holy; “praise You, selah”: wherever “selah” is said, it denotes the level of without limit, for their apprehension is constantly renewed from the Infinite Light, which is without limit.
A line from the Amidah, “holy ones praise You every day, selah,” is read as describing the souls in Gan Eden. The Talmud teaches that “selah” means endlessness, so the souls’ praise reflects understanding that is renewed without end.
The paragraph supports the idea of endless gradations in Gan Eden from two sayings: the tzaddik burned by his fellow’s canopy, and the endless praise of the “holy ones.”
A note points to the Alter Rebbe’s maamarim on Vayikra, where the “holy ones” are explained as the highest of all souls. The renewal of apprehension “every day” matches the endless ascent described in the previous paragraph.
Marei mekomos
- 1כל צדיק נכוה מחופתו של חבירו · Bava Batra 75a:15
- 2וקדושים בכל יום יהללוך סלה · ברכת אבות. וראה במאמרי אדה״א ויקרא ע׳ מח דשם מבאר שהן הנשמות הגבוהות מכל הנשמות ע״ש.
- 3כ״מ שנאמר סלה · Eruvin 54a
4ולכן ארז״ל מוטב דלידייני׳1 וליתי לעלמא דאתי כי אין כדאי כל הדינים נגד תענוג השגתו הנ״ל. אף שבג״ע התחתון אין ערוך כלל וכו׳.
Therefore our Sages said, “Better that he be judged and come to the World to Come,” for all the judgments are not worth [considering] compared to the delight of his apprehension described above. Even in the Lower Gan Eden there is no comparison at all, etc.
The Talmud reports that Elisha ben Avuyah’s judgment was carried out so that he could reach the World to Come: “better he be judged and come to the World to Come.” The Alter Rebbe explains that any suffering is worth it, since nothing compares to the delight of grasping G‑dliness; even the Lower Gan Eden is beyond comparison with this world.
וכן ג״ע תחתון נגד ג״ע עליון עד רום המעלות כי התענוגי׳ שנמשכו מאוא״ס מקור כל התענוגים הם בלי גבול.
And likewise the Lower Gan Eden compared to the Higher Gan Eden, up to the highest heights, for the delights drawn from the Infinite Light, the source of all delights, are without limit.
The same gap exists between the Lower and the Higher Gan Eden, and so on upward without end. Because all delight comes from the Infinite Light, the source of every pleasure, the delights it gives are limitless.
The paragraph shows the immensity of the soul’s delight in Gan Eden: it outweighs all judgment, and each level of it is incomparably beyond the one below.
Marei mekomos
- 1מוטב דלידייני׳ · Chagigah 15b:3
5וכמו שרואים בחוש שאף מה שנפל בשבה״כ תענוגים גשמיים הוא ג״כ אין שיעור כי יש כמה מיני תענוגים כידוע לאין מספר. אם כן עאכו״כ השרש ומקור לזה תענוג רוחני אף מגעה״ת הוא בלי גבול1 מא״ס.
As we see with our own senses that even what fell in the shattering of the vessels, physical delights, is also without measure, for there are many kinds of delights, as is known, without number. If so, all the more is their root and source, spiritual delight, even of the Lower Gan Eden, without limit, from the Infinite One.
Physical pleasures came into being through the “shattering of the vessels,” the primordial breaking in which sparks of holiness fell into the physical world. If even these fallen pleasures come in countless kinds, then their spiritual source, even in the Lower Gan Eden, must be all the more without limit, since it flows from the Infinite.
The paragraph proves the limitlessness of spiritual delight by an argument from the lesser: even physical pleasures are countless, so their spiritual root is surely endless.
The Kehot note records that in the early transcript of Rabbi Pinchas a new section (section 2) begins after these words.
Marei mekomos
- 1שו״ה הוא בלי גבול — ולבעבור זה · בהנחת הר״פ מסומן סעי׳ ב.
Why the soul needs a garment ¶6–13
6ולבעבור זה הנשמה שהיא בחינת בע״ג א״א לה להשיג גילוי הזיו שהוא מהות אלקות כ״א ע״י לבוש שהוא בחי׳ מסך
For this reason the soul, which is a limited being, cannot apprehend the revelation of the radiance, which is the very essence of G‑dliness, except through a garment, which is the level of a screen (masach);
Here is the answer to why the soul needs a garment: as a created, limited being it cannot directly grasp the radiance, which is G‑dliness itself. It needs a garment that acts as a screen, filtering the light.
וע״י אותו לבוש ומסך יכולה לקבל האור והזיו וכמו שמבוא׳ בע״ח שיש בחי׳ מסך ופרגוד.1
and through that garment and screen it is able to receive the light and the radiance, as is explained in Etz Chaim that there is the level of a screen and a curtain (pargod).
Through that garment the soul can receive the light. The Alter Rebbe notes that the Arizal’s Etz Chaim speaks of a “screen” (masach) and “curtain” (pargod) that make it possible for a lower level to receive from a higher one; the Kehot note places this at the beginning of the gate on the order of the worlds of Atzilus, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.
The paragraph gives the reason for the garment: a finite soul can only receive infinite radiance through a screen that tempers it.
Marei mekomos
- 1וכמו שמבואר בע״ח · שער סדר אבי״ע בתחלתו.
7וכמו ד״מ אור גדול1 שאין יכולים להביט בו מחמת רוב בהירותו וכשיש מסך מבדיל אז יכולים לקבל את האור אחר שנתעלם ההארה קצת ע״י מסך
As, for example, a great light which one cannot look at because of its great brightness; but when there is a separating screen, then one can receive the light, once the illumination has been somewhat concealed by the screen.
The first illustration: a very bright light blinds, but through a filtering screen one can look at it. The screen does not block the light; it dims it enough to make it receivable.
וכמו דבר חכמה ושכל גדול אין יכולים להסביר לפני קטן בחכמה כ״א ע״י לבוש ומשל אז מבין הדבר כמו״כ נקראים מצות לבושין שהם ג״כ בחי׳ משל.
And likewise a matter of wisdom and great intellect cannot be explained to one who is small in wisdom except through a garment and a parable; then he understands the matter. So too the mitzvos are called garments, for they too are the level of a parable.
The second illustration: a deep idea can be taught to a beginner only through a parable that “clothes” it. The mitzvos are garments in the same way: they are a kind of parable through which the soul receives what it could not otherwise grasp.
The paragraph gives two analogies for the garment, a screen that tempers a bright light and a parable that clothes a deep idea, and applies them to the mitzvos.
The analogy of the bright light is developed at length in Iggeres HaKodesh 29 and in the Tzemach Tzedek’s Biurei HaZohar, as the Kehot note points out.
Marei mekomos
- 1וכמו ד״מ אור גדול · ראה המשל גם לעיל טז, א. ובאגה״ק סי׳ כט. ובביאוה״ז לצ״צ כרך א ע׳ רי בארוכה.
8וכמ״ש משל הקדמוני1 היינו שיהי׳ התגלות עצם רצון אור א״ס זה א״א שיכול2 לבוא לידי גילוי לשום נברא רק ע״י התלבשות רצונו ית׳ בעשיי׳ גשמי׳ מעשה המצוה.
As it is written, “the parable of the Ancient One”: that is, that there should be a revelation of the very essence of the will of the Infinite Light; this cannot come to be revealed to any created being except through the clothing of His will, may He be blessed, in physical action, the deed of the mitzvah.
The phrase “the parable of the Ancient One” (from Samuel) is read as “the parable of the One who precedes the world,” G‑d Himself. G‑d’s innermost will cannot be revealed to any creature directly; it can only be revealed when it is clothed in a physical act, the doing of a mitzvah.
ולכן נק׳ המצות לבושין ושרש המצות גבוה מאד ששרשם מבחי׳ כתר עליון תר״ך עמודי אור.
Therefore the mitzvos are called garments. And the root of the mitzvos is very high, for their root is from the level of the Supernal Keser, the 620 pillars of light.
That is why the mitzvos are called garments. Their root is very high, in the Supernal Keser, the level of divine will above intellect, which Kabbalah calls the “620 pillars of light,” corresponding to the 613 mitzvos of the Torah and the 7 of the Rabbis.
The paragraph explains that the mitzvos, as physical deeds, are the “parable” that clothes G‑d’s essential will, and that their root is in Keser.
Torah Ohr on Megillas Esther, cited by the note, explains “the Ancient One” as the One who precedes the world, G‑d’s essence beyond both the light that fills and the light that encompasses the worlds, and the Torah as a parable for it. The number 620 (the gematria of Keser) is the total of the 613 Biblical and 7 Rabbinic mitzvos.
Marei mekomos
- 1משל הקדמוני · I Samuel 24:14
- 2שו״ה משל — שיכול · בהגהת הרה״ח ר׳ אשר: שיוכל.
9ונשתלשלו ע״י שערות וכו׳ עד שנשתלשלו למטה בעשייה גשמי׳ ציצית וסוכה ובהם דוקא נתגלה רצונו ית׳ סוף מעשה במחשבה תחלה נעוץ תחב״ס1 דפעם א׳ נאמר בראשי׳ ברא כו׳ השמים ואת הארץ שמים תחלה.2
And they descended in a chain by way of the “hairs,” etc., until they descended below into physical Asiyah, tzitzis and sukkah, and in them specifically His will, may He be blessed, is revealed. “The end of action is first in thought,” “their beginning is embedded in their end.” For in one place it says, “In the beginning [G‑d] created, etc., the heavens and the earth”: heavens first.
From Keser the mitzvos descended step by step, through the “hairs” (a Kabbalistic image for thin channels from the Crown), down to physical deeds such as tzitzis and sukkah, and in these specifically G‑d’s will is revealed. As the saying goes, what comes last in action was first in thought; Sefer Yetzirah teaches that the beginning is embedded in the end. The first verse of the Torah lists heaven before earth.
The paragraph traces the descent of the mitzvos from the highest level to physical objects and introduces the principle that the last in action is first in intent.
The “hairs” (se’aros) of the Kabbalah are the channels through which light passes from Arich Anpin, the inner level of Keser, in a very contracted way. That the highest root is revealed in the lowest deed is a recurring theme: what is highest falls lowest.
Marei mekomos
- 1נעוץ תחב״ס · Sefer Yetzirah 1:7
- 2בראשית ברא · Genesis 1:1
10וכתיב ביום עשות1 ה׳ אלקים ארץ ושמים. ארץ תחלה. כאן במעשה. וכאן במחשבה.2 ודרך כלל שמים הוא בחי׳ רוחניות.
And it is written, “On the day that the L‑rd G‑d made earth and heavens”: earth first. Here it refers to action, and there to thought. And in general, heavens are the level of spirituality,
A second verse puts earth before heaven. The Sages resolved the contradiction: in actual creation heaven came first, but in G‑d’s thought earth came first. Heaven stands for the spiritual.
וארץ בחי׳ גשמיות ובמעשה קדמה שמים כי בדרך השתלשלות הרוחניות מחיה ומהוה בחי׳ גשמיות אבל במחשבה קדמה בחי׳ גשמיות סוף מעשה במח״ת כי התגלות האור מסוכ״ע.
and earth the level of physicality. In action, heavens came first, for in the order of the chain of descent the spiritual gives life to and brings into being the physical; but in thought, the physical came first, “the end of action is first in thought,” for the revelation of the light is from the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin).
Earth stands for the physical. In the order of creation the spiritual gives rise to the physical, so heaven comes first; but in G‑d’s intention the physical is first, because it is through physical things that the highest light, the light that encompasses all worlds, is revealed.
The paragraph uses the order of heaven and earth in two verses to show that the physical world, though last in creation, is first in G‑d’s purpose.
Likkutei Sichos, cited by the note, discusses this Talmudic passage. The principle explains why the mitzvos, rooted in Keser, are performed specifically with physical objects.
Marei mekomos
- 1ביום עשות ה׳ אלקים ארץ ושמים · Genesis 2:4
- 2ארץ תחלה כאן במעשה וכאן במחשבה · Chagigah 12a:16–17
11וגילוי הרצון תר״ך עמודי אור הוא ע״י קיום רצונו בדברים גשמיים ממש אשר שרשם מעולם התהו ובהם דוקא מתלבש רצה״ע.
And the revelation of the will, the 620 pillars of light, comes through fulfilling His will in truly physical things, whose root is from the World of Tohu; and in them specifically the Supernal will is clothed.
The divine will, the “620 pillars of light,” is revealed specifically when it is carried out with physical things. These things are rooted in the World of Tohu, the primordial world of intense lights that shattered, and that is why the Supernal will can be clothed in them.
ולכן המצות הם לבושים אשר על ידם תוכל הנשמה להשיג ולהנות התענוג והזיו בג״ע.
Therefore the mitzvos are garments through which the soul is able to apprehend and enjoy the delight and the radiance in Gan Eden.
This explains why the mitzvos serve as garments: through them the soul can grasp and enjoy the delight and radiance of Gan Eden.
The paragraph concludes that physical mitzvos, rooted in the high World of Tohu, carry the divine will and so serve as the soul’s garments in Gan Eden.
Physical things derive from Tohu, whose lights were higher than those of Tikkun but whose vessels shattered. Hence the physical can carry a revelation from beyond the ordered worlds.
12ולזה המצות הם כמו לבוש שענין הלבוש הוא שאינו בא באדם להיות לו חיות פנימי
For this reason the mitzvos are like a garment, for the nature of a garment is that it does not enter into a person to be his inner life-force,
A garment differs from what nourishes a person from within. It stays outside and does not become part of the person’s inner life.
כמו מזון שנעשה לאחדים ממש עם האדם ומחיה אותו ואעפ״כ צ״ל שיש במלבושין מעלה יתירה ששרשם מבחי׳ מקיפים.
as food does, which becomes truly one with the person and gives him life; and nevertheless one must say that garments have a superior quality, for their root is from the level of the encompassing [lights] (makifim).
Food becomes one with the body and sustains it, while a garment does not. Yet garments have an advantage: they correspond to the “encompassing” lights (makifim), which are higher than what can enter within.
The paragraph contrasts a garment with food and shows that the garment, though external, is rooted in the higher encompassing level.
In Chassidus, Torah study is often compared to food (inner light) and the mitzvos to garments (encompassing light). The garment’s external quality is what lets it carry a light too great to be absorbed.
13ולבעבור זה הוא מקיף על האדם ומגין עליו ומשמרו כמו״כ מעשה המצות אשר שרשם הם מבחי׳ מקיפים כתר עליון
For this reason it encompasses a person, protects him and guards him. So too the deed of the mitzvos, whose root is from the level of the encompassing [lights], the Supernal Keser;
Because a garment surrounds a person, it can protect and guard him. The mitzvos are the same: their root is in the “encompassing” lights of the Supernal Keser, the Crown above intellect.
לכן לא בא התגלותם למטה בבחי׳ אור פנימי רק בעשייה גשמי׳ ממש וכידוע שמה שבשרשו יותר גבוה נופל למטה יותר.
therefore their revelation does not come below as an inner light, but only in actual physical action; and, as is known, what is higher in its root falls lower.
Since their root is so high, the mitzvos cannot be revealed below as an inner, understood light; they come down only as plain physical deeds. This follows a known rule: the higher a thing’s source, the lower it falls.
אכן ע״י מעשה המצות נעשה בחי׳ מקיף ומסך שע״י המצות תוכל להתענג בתענוג אא״ס וזהו תכלית ירידת הנשמה ירידה צורך עלייה
Indeed, through the deed of the mitzvos an encompassing [light] and a screen come about, so that through the mitzvos [the soul] is able to delight in the delight of the Infinite Light. And this is the purpose of the soul’s descent: a descent for the sake of an ascent.
Performing the mitzvos creates an encompassing garment that also acts as a screen, letting the soul enjoy the delight of the Infinite Light. This is why the soul comes down into a body: the descent serves a greater ascent.
ע״י עשיית המצוה תוכל לקבל האור והתענוג ע״י מסך הנ״ל אשר מתלבשת הנשמה בג״ע בלבושי המצות ומחמת כי המצות שרשם מגולגלתא וכ״ע.
Through doing the mitzvah it is able to receive the light and the delight through the screen mentioned above, for the soul clothes itself in Gan Eden in the garments of the mitzvos; and because the root of the mitzvos is from the Gulgalta and the Supernal Keser,
Through the mitzvah’s screen the soul can receive the light and delight in Gan Eden, where it wears the mitzvos as garments. The mitzvos can do this because they are rooted in the Gulgalta (the “skull,” the outer aspect of Keser) and the Supernal Keser.
לכן ע״י קיום המצות רצונו ית׳ והיום לעשותן ולמחר לקבל שכרם1 בג״ע אשר יתגלה אורן אז כשתתלבש הנשמה בלבוש המצות תתענג הנשמה בתענוג אוא״ס בלתי בע״ג ע״י מסך ולבוש המצות כנ״ל.
therefore, through fulfilling the mitzvos, His will, may He be blessed (“today to do them, and tomorrow to receive their reward” in Gan Eden, where their light will be revealed), then, when the soul clothes itself in the garment of the mitzvos, the soul will delight in the delight of the Infinite Light, which is without limit, through the screen and garment of the mitzvos, as explained above.
The Talmud says that this world is the place to perform the mitzvos and the next world the place for their reward. When the soul wears the garment of its mitzvos in Gan Eden, their hidden light is revealed and the soul enjoys the limitless delight of the Infinite Light through that garment.
For they are intermediaries, whose root is exalted, from the Supernal Keser, and they descended in a chain below into physical things (and see what is written above on the verse “And Avraham was old, advanced in days”).
The mitzvos are “intermediaries”: rooted in the highest Keser yet brought down into physical things, they join the soul to what is far beyond it. The text refers back to the maamar on “Avraham was old, advanced in days,” where the “days” are explained as these garments.
The paragraph explains why the mitzvos must be physical deeds and how, being rooted in Keser, they become the encompassing screen through which the soul enjoys the Infinite Light in Gan Eden: the purpose of its descent.
The Zohar on “Avraham came with his days” speaks of the soul’s “days” as garments made from the good deeds of each day; a day lacking in deeds leaves a gap in the garment. Gulgalta, the “skull,” is the outer covering of Arich Anpin, the outer level of Keser.
Marei mekomos
- 1והיום לעשותן ולמחר לקבל שכרם · Eruvin 22a:5–6
- 2ע״פ ואברהם . . בא בימים · לעיל טז, א. בסה״מ תרכ״ז [הוצאת תש״ס] ע׳ לה מציין לכאן: ”אך בתו״א פי׳ בא בימים הם הלבושים הנעשים מהתומ״צ, וצ״ל מה ענין לבוש זה להימים”.
- 3ואברהם זקן בא בימים · Genesis 24:1
The two mirrors ¶14–20
And this is the meaning of “the mirrors of the women who assembled”: for a mirror (mar’ah) is a glass in which one sees. Yet it says “mirrors” in the plural,
The copper laver in the Mishkan was made from “the mirrors of the women who assembled” at its entrance. A mirror is glass in which one sees, but the verse uses the plural, “mirrors.”
because there are two [kinds of] mirrors. [One is] the luminous speculum (aspaklaria hame’irah), that is, clear glass through which one can see from afar by direct light.
The plural hints at two kinds of mirror. The first is the “luminous speculum,” clear glass like a window, through which one sees even distant things directly.
The paragraph introduces a new image, the two kinds of “mirror,” drawn from the women’s mirrors of the Mishkan.
The Talmud’s terms “luminous speculum” and “speculum that does not shine” describe two levels of prophecy. The Alter Rebbe here identifies them with clear glass and a silvered mirror. A sicha of the Rebbe, cited by the note, remarks that the women’s mirrors were, in plain terms, mirrors of the second kind.
Marei mekomos
- 1וזהו ענין מראות הצובאות · בהנחת הר״פ ע׳ קכד מסומן סעיף ג. קטע מכאן מובא בסה״מ תרל״ב ח״א ע׳ צו בשינויים והגהות.
- 2מראות הצובאות · Exodus 38:8
- 3כי יש ב׳ מראות · מובא לקו״ת שמע״צ צב, ב. שה״ש יז, ג. אוה״ת פ׳ כי תשא ע׳ א׳תתקלט. ראה אוה״ת בראשית כרך ז ע׳ תתשיח, א בשינויי לשון. וראה בסה״מ תקע״א ע׳ כד באריכות.
- 4אספקלריא המאירה · באוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ס״ע שמט מביא קטע מכאן. ראה לקו״ת שה״ש כח, ב שמציין לכאן. ובאוה״ת פ׳ כי תשא ע׳ א׳תתקלט ואילך. ויקהל ע׳ ב׳רכה ואילך. ובמשלי ע׳ תקעז. וראה ג״כ בלקוטי שיחות ח״ו ע׳ 198. ושם בהערה 25 שבפשטות מראות הצובאות היו אספשא״מ. קטע מכאן בסה״מ תרל״ב כרך א ע׳ פ. בענין זה ראה גם באוה״ת פ׳ בהעלותך כרך ב בהוספות ד״ה לא כן עבדי משה.
15וזהו ההפרש בין משרע״ה1 לכל הנביאים שבמשה נאמר ומרא׳ ולא בחידות2 ונכתב ומראה בסגו״ל שהוא לשון דכר והוא אספקלריא המאירה אשר3 על ידה אף דבר הרחוק מהאדם רואין אותו דרך אור ישר.
And this is the difference between Moshe our teacher, peace be upon him, and all the prophets: of Moshe it says, “u-mar’eh, and not in riddles,” and mar’eh is written with a segol, which is a masculine form; it is the luminous speculum, through which even a thing far from a person is seen by direct light.
The Torah says Moshe saw G‑d “u-mar’eh, not in riddles.” The Alter Rebbe notes that mar’eh here is vowelled with a segol, a masculine form, which indicates the luminous speculum: direct, clear sight even of what is far away.
כמו כן מעשה המצוה אשר נתלבשה הנשמה בג״ע בלבוש המצות ע״י לבוש הנ״ל שע״י מעשה מצות הנ״ל יכולה הנשמה ליהנות מזיו השכינה בג״ע.4
So too the deed of the mitzvah, in whose garment the soul is clothed in Gan Eden: through that garment, through the deed of these mitzvos, the soul is able to enjoy the radiance of the Shechinah in Gan Eden
The mitzvos work like that clear glass. Clothed in the garment of its mitzvos, the soul in Gan Eden can enjoy the radiance of the Shechinah.
The paragraph identifies the luminous speculum with Moshe’s prophecy and applies it to the soul seeing G‑dliness in Gan Eden through its mitzvos.
Or HaTorah has a variant here: “and one may say that likewise,” presenting the application to the mitzvos as a suggestion.
Marei mekomos
- 1וזהו ההפרש בין משרע״ה · נעתק באוה״ת במדבר ע׳ קלא. סה״מ תרל״ד ע׳ רג.
- 2ומראה ולא בחידות · Numbers 12:8
- 3שו״ה ישר — כמו״כ · באוה״ת: וי״ל כמו״כ.
- 4ולא — ומראה בסגו״ל · ראה אוה״ת סידור ע׳ פב.
16וליהנות מאורו ית׳ כמו באספקלריא המאירה אור ישר אשר נמשך ונתגלה אוא״ס ממעלה למטה בג״ע. ומשה רבינו ג״כ לא1 הי׳ רואה בלי אספקלריא הנ״ל.
and to enjoy His light, may He be blessed, as through the luminous speculum, by direct light, in which the Infinite Light is drawn down and revealed from above to below in Gan Eden. And Moshe our teacher too did not see without this speculum.
In Gan Eden the soul enjoys G‑d’s light as through clear glass, the Infinite Light shining down directly. Even Moshe needed such a “glass”: no one sees without some medium.
וכמ״ש ומראה ולא בחידות והיינו באספקלרי׳ המאירה אשר בלא אספקלריא לא היה יכול להשיג בחי׳ אא״ס.2 אכן שאר הנביאים ראו במראה בקמ״ץ אספקלריא דלא נהרא וביד הנביאים אדמה.34
As it is written, “u-mar’eh, and not in riddles,” that is, through the luminous speculum, for without a speculum he could not have apprehended the level of the Infinite Light. But the other prophets saw through a mar’ah with a kamatz, the speculum that does not shine, [as it says,] “and through the prophets I am imaged.”
Moshe’s sight was through the luminous speculum, without which even he could not have grasped the Infinite Light. The other prophets saw through mar’ah with a kamatz, the speculum that does not shine, as the verse says, G‑d is “imaged” through the prophets.
The paragraph stresses that even the highest seeing requires a medium, and contrasts Moshe’s clear speculum with the other prophets’ speculum that does not shine.
According to the Kehot notes, Or HaTorah lacks some words here and adds a long gloss on the point that Moshe too could not apprehend the Infinite without a speculum.
Marei mekomos
- 1ומשה רבינו ג״כ לא הי׳ רואה בלי אספקלריא · ראה באוה״ת פ׳ חיי שרה קח, א. ובפ׳ בא ע׳ שכט.
- 2יכול — להשיג בחי׳ אא״ס · באוה״ת שם הגהה ארוכה.
- 3וביד הנביאים אדמה · Hosea 12:11
- 4ולא — והיינו באספקלרי׳ המאירה · תי׳ אלו ליתא באוה״ת שם.
17וענין אספקלריא שאינה מאירה הוא הנק׳ שפיג״ל דהיינו שיש מסך וכסוי על הזכוכית אבל המסך אינו דבר עב שהוא מסתיר לגמרי ומכסה האור רק דבר דק וקלוש היינו צפוי כסף הידוע.
And the speculum that does not shine is what is called a spiegel [mirror]: that is, there is a screen and covering on the glass; but the screen is not something thick that conceals and covers the light entirely, only something thin and fine, namely the well-known silver coating.
The speculum that does not shine is an ordinary mirror (the Yiddish spiegel): glass with a covering on it. The covering is not thick enough to block everything; it is only the thin layer of silver on the back of a mirror.
The paragraph defines the speculum that does not shine as a silvered mirror, whose screen is thin.
18ואז כשרואין בו באספקלריא הנ״ל נמשך ממנו או״ח אבל אין יכולים לראות דרך הזכוכי׳ באו״י
And then, when one looks into this speculum, reflected light is drawn back from it, but one cannot see through the glass by direct light.
In a mirror the light bounces back, “reflected light,” instead of passing through as “direct light.” One cannot see through it.
ולכן אין רואין מהות הדבר הנראה ועצמותו כמו ע״י אספקלריא המאירה כי אם רק דמות לבד1 נראה ע״י אספקלריא שאינה מאירה.2
And therefore one does not see the essence and very being of the thing seen, as through the luminous speculum; only an image is seen through the speculum that does not shine.
So in a mirror one sees only an image, not the thing itself as through a window.
אמנם יש באספקלריא שאינה מאירה מעלה א׳ גבוה במדרגה שיכולין לראות עצמו וגם לראות מאחוריו כידוע מה שאין יכולין לראות באספקלריא המאירה3 וזהו ארץ קדמה ודו״ק.
However, the speculum that does not shine has one quality that is higher in rank: one can see oneself and also see what is behind one, as is known, which cannot be seen through the luminous speculum. And this is [the meaning of] “earth came first”; consider this carefully.
Yet a mirror has an advantage a window lacks: one can see oneself and what is behind one. The Alter Rebbe links this to “earth came first,” the physical being first in G‑d’s thought.
ועד״ז תירצו בגמ׳ ביבמות (ספ״ד)4 דישעיה שאמר ואראה את5 ה׳6 היינו באספקלריא שאינה מאירה שבה יוכל לראות את ה׳.
And in this way they answered in the Gemara in Yevamos (end of chapter 4) that Yeshayahu, who said, “And I saw G‑d,” [saw] through the speculum that does not shine, in which he could see G‑d,
The Talmud reconciles Isaiah’s “I saw G‑d” with the verse “no man shall see Me” by saying that Isaiah saw through the speculum that does not shine. Paradoxically, that lesser medium allowed a seeing of G‑d.
משא״כ באספקלריא המאירה כתיב כי לא יראני7 כו׳. וענין אספקלריא דלא נהרא הוא בחי׳ בכל מאדך8 היינו ענין ירידת הנשמה בגוף ירידה צורך עליי׳ להפך נה״ב
whereas of the luminous speculum it is written, “For no man shall see Me, etc.” And the speculum that does not shine is the level of “with all your might,” that is, the descent of the soul into the body, a descent for the sake of an ascent, to transform the animal soul;
Of the luminous speculum it says “no man shall see Me.” The speculum that does not shine corresponds to serving G‑d “with all your might,” beyond one’s limits: the soul descends into a body to transform the animal soul, a descent for the sake of ascent.
וע״י בחי׳ אתכפיא ואתהפכא בכל מאדך בלי גבול למעלה מן הכלי אז נמשך מלמעלה ג״כ שלא כסדר ודרך השתלשלות מאיר אור עליון.
and through subduing and transforming [it], “with all your might,” without limit, beyond the vessel, then there is drawn from above as well, not in order and not by way of the chain of descent, the shining of the Supernal Light.
When a person subdues and transforms the animal soul with a love that breaks his own limits, a matching light comes from above that also breaks the normal order of the worlds: a higher light that does not follow the step-by-step chain of descent.
The paragraph shows that the speculum that does not shine, though lesser, has a unique advantage, and identifies it with the soul’s work of transforming the animal soul, which draws a light beyond the ordered worlds.
“With all your might” (bechol me’odecha) is the love beyond the vessel, beyond a person’s natural measure. Here the mirror’s “reflected light” stands for the service that rises from below, from the struggle with the animal soul, rather than the light that comes down directly from above.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי אם רק דמות לבד · ראה אוה״ת מטות ע׳ א׳שטז.
- 2ע״י אספקלריא שאינה מאירה · באוה״ת במדבר יש הוספה.
- 3לראות — לראות באספקלריא המאירה · באוה״ת יש הגהה.
- 4בגמרא ביבמות (ספ״ד) · מט, ב.
- 5ואראה את ה׳ · Isaiah 6:1
- 6
- 7כי לא יראני · Exodus 33:20
- 8בחי׳ בכל מאדך · Deuteronomy 6:5
19וזהו אספקלריא דלא נהרא דהיינו ע״י דבר מסך ומבדיל שאין מאיר האור דרך ישר היינו שנה״ב הוא מכסה ומסתיר האור.
And this is the speculum that does not shine: that is, through something that screens and separates, so that the light does not shine directly; that is, the animal soul covers and conceals the light.
In the soul, the mirror’s screen is the animal soul. It conceals the G‑dly light so that it does not shine directly.
אכן אין הדבר המבדיל מסך עב שהוא מסתיר לגמרי רק יכול לאתכפייא ולאתהפכא אז נעשה מזה בחי׳ או״ח
Yet the separating thing is not a thick screen that conceals entirely; rather, it can be subdued and transformed, and then reflected light comes about from it,
Like the mirror’s thin silver, the animal soul is not a total barrier. It can be subdued and transformed, and then it produces “reflected light.”
כמו בזכוכית שע״י המסך המסתיר נוסף עי״ז או״ח חדש שלא היה מקודם שהי׳ המסך הנ״ל ויכול לראות אח״ז אור חדש היינו שיכול לראו׳ גם מאחוריו.
as with glass, where through the concealing screen a new reflected light is added that did not exist before the screen was there, and one can then see a new light, that is, one can see also what is behind one.
In a mirror the silvering creates something new: reflected light that lets one see what is behind one. The screen does not only hide; it adds a new kind of sight.
כמו״כ אחר שנתהפכ׳ נה״ב אז ע״י בחי׳ בכל מאדך נתוסף אור המאיר ג״כ יותר מקודם שהיתה הנשמה בגוף ירידה צורך עליי׳ שע״י אתכפייא סט״א אסתלק
So too, after the animal soul has been transformed, then through “with all your might” a light is added that shines more than before the soul was in the body, a descent for the sake of an ascent; for when the sitra achra is subdued, there ascends
Likewise, when the animal soul is transformed through love “with all your might,” a greater light shines than before the soul came down into the body. The Zohar teaches that when the sitra achra, the side opposed to holiness, is subdued, G‑d’s glory rises.
יקרא דקוב״ה1 לעילא לעילא ומאיר שלא ע״פ סדר השתלשלות וזה נק׳ אספקלריא דלא נהרא2 (ועמש״ל ע״פ אעשה לו עזר כנגדו)34 וענין גילוי זה י״ל ע״ד שנתבאר במ״א פי׳ קדושתי למעלה מקדושתכם5 דמאי קמ״ל פשיטא.
the glory of the Holy One, blessed be He, higher and higher, and it shines not according to the order of the chain of descent; and this is called the speculum that does not shine (and see what is written above on “I will make him a helper opposite him”). And this revelation may be understood in the way explained elsewhere on the meaning of “My holiness is above your holiness”: what does it teach us? It is obvious!
This light is higher and higher and shines beyond the normal order of the worlds. This, too, is the “speculum that does not shine.” The Alter Rebbe introduces a Midrash, “My holiness is above your holiness,” and asks why it needs saying at all.
אלא דר״ל כי המצות הם מבחי׳ כתר כמש״ל. וזהו קדושתכ׳ אשר קדשנו וכו׳. ונודע שהכתר כלול מב׳ פרצופים.6 היינו בחי׳ עתיק זהו בחי׳ תחתונה שבמאציל ובחי׳ א״א זהו שרש הנאצלים.
Rather, it means that the mitzvos are from the level of Keser, as explained above, and this is “your holiness”: “Who has sanctified us, etc.” And it is known that Keser comprises two partzufim: the level of Atik, which is the lowest level within the Emanator, and the level of Arich Anpin, which is the root of the emanated.
The answer: the mitzvos come from Keser, and so give Israel a holiness (“Who has sanctified us with His mitzvos”). Keser itself has two levels: Atik, the lowest level of the Creator Himself, and Arich Anpin, the root of all that is created.
The paragraph applies the mirror image to the soul: the animal soul is the screen, and its transformation produces a new light beyond the order of the worlds; it then begins to explain this through the two levels within Keser.
Atik (Atik Yomin) and Arich Anpin are the inner and outer levels of Keser. Atik is the lowest level within the Emanator, G‑d Himself; Arich Anpin is the root of what is emanated. Tanya chapter 27, cited by the note, explains the Zohar on the rising of G‑d’s glory when the sitra achra is subdued.
Marei mekomos
- 1אסתלק יקרא דקוב״ה · Zohar II, 67b
- 2וזה נק׳ אספקלריא דלא נהרא · ע״כ בהנחת הר״פ.
- 3ע״פ אעשה לו עזר כנגדו · לעיל ה, א.
- 4ע״פ אעשה לו עזר כנגדו · Genesis 2:18
- 5שנתבאר במ״א פי׳ קדושתי למעלה מקדושתכם · ראה לקו״ת שלח מו, ב ואילך. נצבים נ, ב.
- 6ונודע שהכתר כלול מב׳ פרצופים · ראה לקמן צא, ג ובמ״מ לשם.
20ועז״א יכול כמוני. היינו בחי׳ תחתונה שבמאציל שהוא עתיק. ת״ל כי קדוש אני1 קדושתי למעלה מקדושתכם שהמצות ממשיכים מבחי׳ א״א
And of this it says, “Could it be like Me?”, that is, the lowest level within the Emanator, which is Atik. The verse teaches, “For I am holy”: My holiness is above your holiness, for the mitzvos draw down from the level of Arich Anpin,
The Midrash says, “Could Israel’s holiness be like Mine? The verse says, ‘For I am holy’: My holiness is above yours.” The Alter Rebbe explains: Israel’s holiness comes from the mitzvos, drawn from Arich Anpin, while G‑d’s “My holiness” refers to Atik, which is higher.
whereas Atik is called Atik Yomin (the Ancient of Days) because it is removed and separate from the level of the “days,” which are the garments made from the mitzvos, of which it is said, “Who is the man, etc.,
Atik is called “the Ancient of Days” because it is set apart from the “days,” the garments made from the mitzvos. The Alter Rebbe cites the Psalm “Who is the man…”
אוהב ימים לראות טוב4 סומוע״ט והיינו בבחי׳ א״א משא״כ בחי׳ עתיק יומין הוא בחי׳ קדושתי למעלה כו׳
who desires life, who loves days to see good?” [and then,] “Turn from evil and do good.” And that is in the level of Arich Anpin; whereas the level of Atik Yomin is the level of “My holiness is above, etc.”
“Who loves days to see good? Turn from evil and do good”: the “days” are made by doing mitzvos, which belong to Arich Anpin. Atik is above them, “My holiness is above.”
אך ע״י בירור נה״ב בכל מאדך נמשך גילוי מבחי׳ זו כו׳ כי זהו ענין במקום שבעלי תשובה עומדים56 כו׳ בחילא יתיר7 בחי׳ בכל מאדך כו׳:
But through the refinement of the animal soul “with all your might,” a revelation is drawn from this level, etc. For this is the meaning of “In the place where baalei teshuvah stand, etc.,” with greater strength, the level of “with all your might,” etc.
Yet when the animal soul is refined with love “with all your might,” a revelation is drawn even from Atik. This is why baalei teshuvah stand where the perfectly righteous cannot: their return comes with “greater strength,” beyond measure.
The paragraph explains that the mitzvos reach Arich Anpin, but the transformation of the animal soul, the service of teshuvah “with all your might,” draws a revelation from the still higher level of Atik.
A note of the Rebbe suggests that “removed from the days” refers to the mitzvos in themselves, not to the refinement of time they bring about, as the end of this paragraph shows. The Zohar’s “greater strength” of baalei teshuvah reflects their turning darkness into light.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי קדוש אני · Leviticus 19:2
- 2עתיק יומין · Daniel 7:9
- 3עתיק יומין . . הנעשים מהמצות · יש לומר שהכוונה היא לענין המצות (מצד עצמם) אבל לא לענין בירור הזמן שנעשה עי״ז. ולהעיר מזה שמסיים בתו״א שם: אך ע״י בירור נה״ב כו׳, ועצ״ע — ד״ה ואברהם זקן תשל״ח הערה 78.
- 4מי האיש כו׳ אוהב ימים לראות טוב · Psalms 34:13
- 5במקום שבעלי תשובה עומדים · נסמן לעיל כא, ג.
- 6במקום שבעלי תשובה עומדים · Berakhot 34b:22–23
- 7בחילא יתיר · Zohar I, 129b
Garments, crowns and the lamp ¶21–29
21ולתוספת ביאור בענין הלבושים1 לנשמה בג״ע יובן ע״פ מה שפי׳ בזוה״ק ס״פ תולדות שהמלאכים בירידתם לעוה״ז מתלבשים בלבוש כי להיותם רוחניים לכן כדי שיומשכו בעולם השפל הוא ע״י לבוש כו׳.
And for a further explanation of the soul’s garments in Gan Eden, it can be understood from what is explained in the holy Zohar at the end of Parshas Toldos: that the angels, when they descend to this world, clothe themselves in a garment; for since they are spiritual, in order for them to be drawn into the lowly world it must be through a garment, etc.
The Alter Rebbe adds a further angle on the soul’s garments, from the Zohar at the end of Parshas Toldos. When angels come down into this world they must put on a garment, because purely spiritual beings cannot otherwise exist in a physical place.
וכך יובן בהפוך שכדי שהנשמה תשיג ותהנה מזיו השכינה צ״ל ג״כ ע״י לבוש רוחני כנ״ל.
And so it can be understood in reverse: in order for the soul to apprehend and enjoy the radiance of the Shechinah, it too must be through a spiritual garment, as explained above.
The soul’s case is the reverse: it goes up rather than down. To grasp the radiance of the Shechinah it, too, needs a garment, a spiritual one.
אך לכאורה אין המשל דומה שהרי הנשמה היא עצם רוחני וא״כ למה צריכה ללבוש בשביל להשיג הזיו כו׳.
But at first glance the analogy is not alike, for the soul is a spiritual entity; if so, why does it need a garment in order to apprehend the radiance, etc.?
An objection: the angel needs a garment because it is spiritual and enters a physical world. But the soul is spiritual and goes to a spiritual place, so why would it need a garment?
אך הענין הוא כי רוחניות וגשמיות שניהם נבראים ומחודשים מאין ליש משא״כ זיו השכינה שהוא גילוי אלקות ממש כמ״ש בפ׳ חיי שרה ע״פ ואברהם זקן.
But the explanation is that spirituality and physicality are both created and brought into being from nothing to something, whereas the radiance of the Shechinah is a revelation of actual G‑dliness, as [explained] in Parshas Chayei Sarah on the verse “And Avraham was old.”
The answer is that spiritual and physical are both created, brought into being from nothing. The radiance of the Shechinah is not something created; it is G‑dliness itself, as explained in the maamar on “Avraham was old” in Chayei Sarah.
והרי האלקות הוא למעלה מרוחניות כמו שהוא למעל׳ מגשמיות שהרי אין ערוך הנבראים לגבי הבורא:
And G‑dliness is above spirituality just as it is above physicality, for created beings bear no comparison to the Creator.
G‑dliness is just as far above the spiritual as it is above the physical, since nothing created compares to the Creator. So the soul, though spiritual, needs a garment to receive it.
The paragraph sharpens the need for the garment: G‑dliness is as far beyond the spiritual soul as beyond the physical world, so the soul needs a garment just as an angel does when it comes down.
An early transcript of the maamar, printed in Maamarei Admur HaZaken 5571 from the Tzemach Tzedek’s manuscript, discusses this at length. The principle that spiritual and physical are equal before G‑d is a recurring foundation in Chabad thought.
Marei mekomos
- 1ולתוספות ביאור בענין הלבושים · הנחה אחרת באריכות במאמרי אדה״ז תקע״א ע׳ לג (נדפס מגוכתי״ק הצ״צ).
And this is [the meaning of] “Who is enthroned on high, etc., Who looks down low, etc.” Therefore, for [the soul] to apprehend this very revelation, it is possible only through a garment from the deed of the mitzvos, etc.
The Psalm describes G‑d as enthroned high above and yet looking down low, equally far from heaven and earth. Therefore the soul can receive the revelation of G‑dliness only through a garment made from its mitzvos.
והנה ארז״ל צדיקי׳ יושבים ועטרותיה׳ בראשיהם ונהנים מזיו פי׳ נהנין מזיו הוא גילוי מהות הזיו ממש3 וזהו כענין הראיה באספקלריא המאירה שהוא השגת המהות ממש ע״י הלבושים מהמצות.
Now our Sages said, “The righteous sit with their crowns on their heads and enjoy the radiance.” “Enjoy the radiance” means a revelation of the very essence of the radiance; and this is like seeing through the luminous speculum, which is the apprehension of the very essence, through the garments from the mitzvos.
The Talmud says the righteous in the World to Come sit with crowns on their heads and enjoy the radiance of the Shechinah. “Enjoying the radiance” is seeing G‑dliness itself, as through the clear, luminous speculum, by means of the garments of the mitzvos.
אך עטרותיהם הוא בחי׳ מקיף והוא בחי׳ שלמעלה מזיו וההארה המושגת להם לפיכך אין נמשכת בבחי׳ גילוי כ״א
But “their crowns” is the level of the encompassing [light], and it is a level that is above the radiance and the illumination they apprehend; therefore it is not drawn in a revealed way, but only
The “crowns” are something different: an encompassing light, higher than the radiance the souls grasp. Because it is so high, it cannot be revealed openly.
ע״ד הראי׳ ע״י אספקלריא שאינה מאירה שאין מושג המהות של הנראה רק ע״ד וביד הנביאים אדמה כו׳.
in the manner of seeing through the speculum that does not shine, in which the essence of what is seen is not apprehended, but only in the manner of “and through the prophets I am imaged, etc.”
The crown is received only as through the mirror that does not shine: one does not see its essence, only an image, as with the prophets other than Moshe.
And therefore it is called a crown. (And see what is written below on the verse “Go out and see, etc., with the crown, etc.” And this is drawn through “with all your might,” as explained above.)
That is why it is called a crown: it sits above the head and encircles it rather than entering. The text refers forward to the verse “Go out and see… the crown,” and says this crown comes from serving G‑d “with all your might.”
The paragraph reads the Talmud’s picture of the righteous in two layers: the “radiance” they enjoy directly through their mitzvos, and the higher “crown” that encompasses them, which comes from love beyond measure.
The Rebbe’s letter of 7 Shevat 5706, cited by the note, discusses this saying. Two manuscript notes show the textual history: one reads “the Shechinah, which is actual G‑dliness above spirituality as above physicality” here, and another lacks the closing parenthesis, which appears to be an addition by the Tzemach Tzedek.
Marei mekomos
- 1המגביהי כו׳ המשפילי · Psalms 113:5
- 2המשפילי · Psalms 113:6
- 3פי׳ נהנין מזיו . . הזיו ממש · בבוך 1223 נמצא במקום תי׳ אלו ”השכינה שהוא גילוי אלקות ממש שלמעלה מרוחנית כמו שהוא למעלה מגשמית מהות הזיו ממש”.
- 4ועמ״ש לקמן בפסוק צאינה וראינה · ראה לעיל ח, ב.
- 5צאינה וראינה וגו׳ בעטרה · Song of Songs 3:11
- 6(ועמ״ש לקמן ע״פ . . בכל מאדך כנ״ל · בבוך 127 אין כל הקטע, כנראה שזהו הוספת הצ״צ.
- 7צדיקים יושבים · Berakhot 17a:12
23וזהו ענין נר מצוה1 וענין נר אלקים נשמת אדם2 היינו ב׳ בחי׳ נר. א׳ הוא אספקלריא המאירה. והב׳ אספקלריא שאינה מאירה.
And this is the meaning of “a mitzvah is a lamp” and of “The soul of man is the lamp of G‑d”: they are two kinds of lamp. One is the luminous speculum, and the second the speculum that does not shine.
Now the two “lamps” from the opening, the mitzvah and the soul, are linked to the two kinds of mirror. One lamp corresponds to the clear, luminous speculum and the other to the speculum that does not shine.
והענין כי הנה בנר יש שמן ופתילה וב׳ גווני אור. נהורא אוכמא שעל הפתילה ונהורא חיורא.
And the explanation is that in a lamp there are oil and a wick, and two hues of light: the dark light upon the wick, and the white light.
A lamp has oil and a wick, and its flame has two colours: a dark light close to the wick, and a white light above it. The Zohar uses these two lights often as symbols.
The paragraph ties the two lamps of the opening verses to the two speculums and introduces the parts of a lamp: oil, wick, and two lights.
The Zohar (on Bereshis) speaks of the dark (or bluish) light that clings to the wick and consumes, and the white light above it that rests on the dark light. This maamar builds its analysis of the soul and the mitzvos on that image.
Marei mekomos
- 1נר מצוה · Proverbs 6:23
- 2נר. . נשמת אדם · Proverbs 20:27
24והנה האור שהוא עיקר הנר הוא נאחז בפתילה דוקא. אבל השמן בלתי אפשר שיאחז בו האור בעצמו כ״א ע״י הפתילה ומ״מ השמן הוא הנכלה בהאור וע״י פתילה א׳ נכלה שמן הרבה כו׳.
Now the light, which is the essence of the lamp, takes hold specifically on the wick. But the light cannot take hold of the oil itself except through the wick; and nevertheless it is the oil that is consumed in the light, and through one wick much oil is consumed, etc.
The flame can only take hold on the wick; it cannot catch the oil directly. Yet it is the oil that actually burns, drawn up through the wick, and one wick burns a great deal of oil.
The paragraph sets out the physics of the lamp: the flame holds onto the wick but feeds on the oil.
25וכך הנה מעשה המצות בעוה״ז הם בחי׳ השמן כמ״ש בזוהר בינוקא דבלק.1 והיינו שמן משחת קדש ששרשו בח״ע ורצון העליון
And so too, the deed of the mitzvos in this world is the level of the oil, as stated in the Zohar in [the section of] the Yanuka in Balak; that is, the oil of holy anointing, whose root is in Supernal Chochmah and the Supernal will.
In this world the mitzvos are the oil. The Zohar’s account of the child-sage in Parshas Balak compares good deeds to oil; their root is the holy anointing oil, which stands for Supernal Chochmah and the Supernal will.
אך שנשתלשלו וירדו בגשמיות בעוה״ז ע״כ אין דרך שיאחז בהם אוא״ס ב״ה כ״א ע״י הפתילה שהיא הנפש האלקית המקיים המצות ואז הוא הממשיך בהם גילוי אוא״ס ב״ה
But since they descended in a chain and came down into physicality in this world, the Infinite Light, blessed be He, has no way to take hold of them except through the wick, which is the G‑dly soul that fulfills the mitzvos; and then it is [the soul] that draws into them the revelation of the Infinite Light, blessed be He.
Since the mitzvos have come down into physical things, the Infinite Light cannot take hold of them directly. It needs a wick, the G‑dly soul that performs them; through the soul the divine light is drawn into the physical deed.
As it is written, “which man shall do them,” for man is the one who makes them into mitzvos, drawing into them the Infinite Light, blessed be He; which is not so with “the kindness of the nations.”
The verse “which man shall do them” can be read as “which man shall make them”: a person makes the deed into a mitzvah by drawing the Infinite Light into it. The same act of kindness done without that connection, “the kindness of the nations,” lacks this.
The paragraph applies the lamp: the mitzvos are the oil and the G‑dly soul is the wick through which the Infinite Light takes hold of them.
Tanya chapters 35 and 53 develop the same Zohar: the Shechinah rests on the person’s body through the “oil” of good deeds, by means of the G‑dly soul as wick. The contrast with “the kindness of the nations” refers to deeds done apart from the commandment; the distinction is about the mitzvah as G‑d’s command, not about the worth of people.
Marei mekomos
- 1בעוה״ז — בזהר בינוקא דבלק · קפז, א. וראה תניא פרק לה. נג.
- 2אשר יעשה אתם האדם · Leviticus 18:5
- 3חסד לאומים · Proverbs 14:34
26וזהו ותורה שם בישראל.1 והיינו ע״י שיש בנפש בחי׳ מס״נ באחד בק״ש2 שהוא בחי׳ בטול לאוא״ס ב״ה. וזהו כמשל הפתילה שבה נאחז האור.
And this is [the meaning of] “and He set a Torah in Israel”: that is, because there is in the soul the quality of self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh) in [saying] “One” in the Shema, which is the level of self-nullification (bittul) to the Infinite Light, blessed be He. And this is like the analogy of the wick on which the light takes hold.
The soul can serve as the wick because it can give itself up entirely to G‑d, as when one says “One” in the Shema with readiness for self-sacrifice. That self-nullification lets the divine light take hold of it, as the flame takes hold of the wick.
והיינו ע״י בטול זה כו׳ משא״כ בשמן כי הנפש היא רוחנית ויש בה בטול זה
That is, through this self-nullification, etc.; which is not so with the oil, for the soul is spiritual and has this self-nullification,
Self-nullification is what the soul has and the oil does not: the soul is spiritual and can set itself aside before G‑d.
משא״כ במעשה המצות עצמן לא שייך לומר כן ולכן האור נאחז בפתילה דוקא אלא שבה
whereas of the deed of the mitzvos themselves one cannot say so; and therefore the light takes hold specifically on the wick, except that in it
The physical mitzvos themselves cannot be said to have such self-nullification. That is why the light takes hold of the wick, the soul.
ועל ידה נמשך גילוי אוא״ס ב״ה במעשה המצות שמדברים גשמיים והוא כמשל השמן הנכלה באור.
and through it the revelation of the Infinite Light, blessed be He, is drawn into the deed of the mitzvos, which are of physical things; and this is like the analogy of the oil that is consumed in the light.
Through the soul, the light then reaches the physical mitzvos and “consumes” them, as the flame consumes the oil drawn up through the wick.
וע״י פתילה א׳ נכלה שמן הרבה היינו כי נשמה א׳ מקיים ועושה מצות רבים לאין שיעור בשני חייו.
And through one wick much oil is consumed: that is, one soul fulfills and does countless mitzvos in the years of its life.
One wick burns much oil: one soul performs countless mitzvos over a lifetime.
The paragraph explains why the soul is the wick: its capacity for self-nullification lets the Infinite Light take hold of it and through it reach the many physical mitzvos.
The readiness for self-sacrifice at “One” of the Shema is a basic Chabad idea: every Jew’s soul has an innate bittul that is aroused at the moment of declaring G‑d’s unity.
Marei mekomos
- 1ותורה שם בישראל · Psalms 78:5
- 2מס״נ באחד בק״ש · Deuteronomy 6:4
27והנה מהשמן נמשך הנהורא חיורא שהוא כענין בחי׳ אספקלריא המאירה היינו בחי׳ אור ישר. והוא בחי׳ תר״ך עמודי אור כנ״ל. והנהורא אוכמא נמשך מהפתילה כי נהורא אוכמא היא בחי׳ אספקלריא שאינה מאירה.
Now from the oil is drawn the white light, which is like the level of the luminous speculum, that is, the level of direct light; and it is the level of the 620 pillars of light, as explained above. And the dark light is drawn from the wick, for the dark light is the level of the speculum that does not shine.
The white light comes from the oil, the mitzvos: it is direct light, like clear glass, the “620 pillars of light” from above. The dark light comes from the wick, the soul, and corresponds to the mirror that does not shine.
The paragraph assigns the two lights of the flame: the white light to the mitzvos (direct light) and the dark light to the soul (the speculum that does not shine).
28והוא ענין אהבת בכל מאדך שנמשך מצד התהפכות נה״ב. כי הפתילה היא נה״א המלובשת בנה״ב.
And it is the love “with all your might,” which is drawn from the transformation of the animal soul. For the wick is the G‑dly soul clothed in the animal soul.
The dark light is the love “with all your might” that comes from transforming the animal soul. The wick is not the G‑dly soul alone but the G‑dly soul as it is clothed in the animal soul.
כי זה שהנשמה נק׳ פתילה הוא דוקא בהתלבשותה בגוף שאז נק׳ היא פתילה לגבי המצות שהם הנק׳ שמן לומר שהאור נאחז בפתיל׳ דוקא כי אז בירידתן למטה הרי הנפש רוחנית והמצות גשמיות.
For the soul is called a wick specifically when it is clothed in the body; then it is called a wick in relation to the mitzvos, which are called oil, meaning that the light takes hold specifically on the wick; for then, in their descent below, the soul is spiritual and the mitzvos are physical.
The soul is the “wick” only while it is in the body. Here below the soul is spiritual and the mitzvos physical, so the light takes hold of the soul and through it of the mitzvos.
משא״כ בעלותן למעלה בג״ע הרי אדרבה האוא״ס נתגלה לנפש ע״י אמצעות הלבושים הנעשים ממעשה המצות א״כ אז המצות הם
But when they ascend above to Gan Eden, on the contrary, the Infinite Light is revealed to the soul by means of the garments made from the deed of the mitzvos; if so, then the mitzvos are
In Gan Eden it is the other way round: the Infinite Light reaches the soul through the garments made from its mitzvos.
כמו בחי׳ פתילה והנפש היא השמן הנכלה באוא״ס ב״ה ע״י אמצעות הפתילה הם לבושים מהמצות וכו׳. אבל בעוה״ז נהפוך הוא שהנשמה נק׳ פתילה.
like the wick, and the soul is the oil that is consumed in the Infinite Light, blessed be He, by means of the wick, which is the garments from the mitzvos, etc. But in this world it is the reverse: the soul is called the wick.
There the mitzvos are the wick and the soul is the oil that is “consumed” in the Infinite Light. In this world it is the reverse, and the soul is the wick.
The paragraph shows that the roles reverse: in this world the soul is the wick and the mitzvos the oil, while in Gan Eden the mitzvos become the wick and the soul the oil.
The reversal matches the two-way relationship described earlier: below, the soul gives the mitzvos their light; above, the mitzvos become the garment through which the soul receives light.
29וכיון שכן שאינו נק׳ פתילה כ״א בהתלבשותה בנה״ב לכן נמשך ממנה נהורא אוכמא היא בחי׳ בכל מאדך וכו׳
And since this is so, that [the soul] is called a wick only when clothed in the animal soul, therefore the dark light is drawn from it, which is the level of “with all your might,” etc.,
Since the soul is a wick only when clothed in the animal soul, the dark light it gives off is the love “with all your might,” born of transforming that animal soul.
בחי׳ או״ח וממעשה המצות נמשך נהורא חיורא הוא בחי׳ שמחה של מצוה ושניהם כא׳ טובים שיש מעלה יתירה בזה כו׳
the level of reflected light; and from the deed of the mitzvos is drawn the white light, which is the level of the joy of a mitzvah. And both alike are good, for there is a superior quality in this, etc.,
That dark light is “reflected light,” rising from below. The white light, from the mitzvos, is the joy of a mitzvah. Each has its own advantage.
ויש וכו׳ כנ״ל בענין אספקלרי׳ המאירה ושאינה מאירה. וזהו שהנשמה נק׳ נר וגם המצות נק׳ נר.
and there is, etc., as explained above regarding the luminous speculum and the one that does not shine. And this is why the soul is called a lamp and the mitzvos too are called a lamp.
This parallels the two speculums described earlier, each with its own quality. It explains why both the soul and the mitzvos are called a lamp.
והיינו כי הנשמה היא בחי׳ הפתילה (בהתלבשותה בנה״ב) והמצות הם בחי׳ השמן ועי״ז נמשך ב׳ בחי׳ אור וכמ״ש ואהבת1 בגימטריא ב״פ אור.4
That is, the soul is the level of the wick (when clothed in the animal soul) and the mitzvos are the level of the oil, and through this two kinds of light are drawn, as it is written, “ve’ahavta” (“and you shall love”), whose numerical value is twice “or” (light).
The soul (in the body) is the wick and the mitzvos are the oil, and together they produce two lights. The word ve’ahavta (“and you shall love”) has the numerical value 414, twice or (“light,” 207).
הוא בחי׳ בכל מאדך ושמחה של מצוה וכמו שבהדלקת הנר מתחלה נמשך ועולה האור שסביב הפתילה שהוא נהורא אוכמא.
This is the level of “with all your might” and the joy of a mitzvah. And just as when a lamp is lit, first the light around the wick, which is the dark light, is drawn and rises,
The two lights are love “with all your might” and the joy of a mitzvah. When a lamp is lit, the dark light around the wick appears first.
ואח״כ נמשך ומתגלה הנהורא חיורא. כן מתחלה צ״ל ההעלאה בבחי׳ בכל מאדך. ואז רוח אייתי רוח ואמשיך רוח23 גילוי אוא״ס ב״ה על ידי מעשה המצות:
and afterwards the white light is drawn and revealed; so first there must be the ascent in the level of “with all your might,” and then “spirit brings forth spirit and draws down spirit”: the revelation of the Infinite Light, blessed be He, through the deed of the mitzvos.
Only afterward does the white light appear. So too, first one must rise with love “with all your might,” and then, as the Zohar says, “spirit brings forth spirit”: the effort from below draws down the revelation of the Infinite Light through the mitzvos.
The paragraph completes the lamp image: the soul’s love beyond measure is the dark light that comes first, and the joy of the mitzvah, the white light of revelation from above, follows from it.
The gematria of ve’ahavta as two lights is discussed in the previous maamar of this parsha. “Spirit brings forth spirit” is the Zohar’s formula for an arousal from below drawing an arousal from above.
Marei mekomos
- 1ואהבת · Deuteronomy 6:5
- 2רוח אייתי רוח ואמשיך רוח · להלן לד, ד. וש״נ.
- 3רוח אייתי רוח ואמשיך רוח · Zohar, Terumah 66:669–678
- 4ואהבת בגימט׳ ב״פ אור · נסמן לעיל לב, ג.
Seven shepherds and eight princes ¶30–42
Now the matter of kindling the lamps that were in the Sanctuary, seven lamps, corresponds to seven levels that exist among those who serve G‑d as a whole.
The Alter Rebbe now turns to the number of lights. The seven-branched Menorah in the Sanctuary stands for seven types among those who serve G‑d.
יש שעבודתו2 בבחי׳ אהבה. ויש שעיקר עבודתו בבחינת יראה כו׳. ונמשכים מבחי׳ שבעה רועים המפרנסים כללות נש״י
There is one whose service is in the mode of love, and there is one whose main service is in the mode of awe, etc. And they are drawn from the level of the seven shepherds who sustain the whole of the souls of Israel
Some serve mainly with love, others mainly with awe, and so on through seven modes. These seven types draw from the “seven shepherds,” the great leaders who nourish all the souls of Israel.
(דאע״פ שכל אחד מקבל מכל השבעה רועים מ״מ יש מי שבחי׳ זו גוברת בו יותר כו׳ כמ״ש בזוהר בנוי דאברהם כו׳ בנוי דיצחק כו׳).
(for although each one receives from all seven shepherds, nevertheless there is one in whom this quality predominates more, etc., as stated in the Zohar, “the children of Avraham, etc., the children of Yitzchak, etc.”).
Every soul receives something from all seven, but in each person one quality dominates. The Zohar speaks accordingly of “children of Avraham” (whose trait is love) and “children of Yitzchak” (whose trait is awe).
וענין שמונה נרות דחנוכה הם כנגד שמונה נסיכי אדם3 וכמ״ש במיכה (סימן ה) אשור כי יבא בארצנו וכו׳
And the eight lamps of Chanukah correspond to the eight princes of men, as it is written in Michah (chapter 5): “When Assyria comes into our land, etc.,
The eight Chanukah lights, by contrast, correspond to the “eight princes of men” in the prophecy of Michah about a future Assyrian invasion.
we will raise up against him seven shepherds and eight princes of men.” And in the Gemara in Sukkah (52b) it explains: the seven shepherds are Avraham, Yaakov, Moshe, etc.,
Michah promises that seven shepherds and eight princes will rise against Assyria. The Talmud identifies the seven shepherds as figures such as Avraham, Yaakov and Moshe.
ושמונה נסיכי אדם ישי ושאול כו׳ ומשיח6 ואליהו. ולהבין זה שהנרות דחנוכה הם כנגד שמונה נסיכי אדם.
and the eight princes of men are Yishai and Shaul, etc., and Mashiach and Eliyahu. And to understand this, that the Chanukah lamps correspond to the eight princes of men:
The eight princes include Yishai, Shaul, Mashiach and Eliyahu. The question now is why the Chanukah lights should correspond to these princes.
והענין כי הנה רועה יש בו ב׳ פירושים. הא׳ לשון מפרנס לאחרים כמו רוענו זוננו.
The explanation is that “shepherd” has two meanings. The first is in the sense of sustaining others, as in “re’enu, zunenu” (tend us, nourish us).
The answer begins with the word “shepherd” (ro’eh), which has two senses. The first is one who feeds others, as in the Grace after Meals: “tend us, nourish us.”
The paragraph links the seven lamps of the Menorah to the seven shepherds and the eight Chanukah lights to the eight princes of men, and begins to explain the difference through the two meanings of “shepherd.”
The Tzemach Tzedek’s Derech Mitzvosecha on the mitzvah of the Chanukah lamp and the Rebbe’s maamar “Ner Chanukah” of 5746 develop this contrast between the Menorah’s seven and Chanukah’s eight. A sicha cited by the note discusses why Mashiach is counted among the princes and not the shepherds.
Marei mekomos
- 1העלאת הנרות שהיו במקדש ז׳ נרות · דרך מצותיך מצות נ״ח עד, א ואילך. ד״ה נר חנוכה תשמ״ו.
- 2שו״ה שבעה — יש שעבודתו כו׳ · ראה לעיל בהערות ותיקונים לכ״ק אדמו״ר זי״ע.
- 3שמונה נסיכי אדם · בארוכה בענין זה ראה באוה״ת נ״ך מיכה ע׳ תעו ואילך.
- 4
- 5אשור כי יבא בארצנו וכו׳ והקמונו עליו שבעה רועים ושמנה נסיכי אדם · Micah 5:4
- 6ושמונה נסיכי . . ומשיח · ראה בלקו״ש חל״ה ע׳ 209 בשולי העמוד בענין מה שמשיח לא נמנה בין הרועים ע״ש. וראה לקמן לד ריש ע״ב שבמשיח יש ב׳ הבחי׳.
And the second, that he shepherds himself, that is, he is sustained, as in “and the she-donkeys were grazing beside them,” and likewise in the Gemara, “grazing in the fields,” and the like.
The second sense of ro’eh is grazing, feeding oneself, as the she-donkeys “grazed” in the book of Job, and the Talmud’s phrase “grazing in the fields.”
וכן בענין השבעה רועים יש ב׳ בחי׳ אלו כי הן המפרנסים כנ״י. אברהם באהבה כמ״ש אברהם אוהבי2 ששרשו מחסד עליון שהוא בחי׳ אהבה ומשפיע מבחי׳ זו לכנס״י ומרע״ה משפיע בחי׳ דעת כו׳.
And likewise with the seven shepherds there are these two aspects. For they are the ones who sustain the Community of Israel: Avraham with love, as it is written, “Avraham who loved Me,” whose root is from the Supernal Chesed, which is the level of love, and he bestows from this level upon the Community of Israel; and Moshe our teacher, peace be upon him, bestows the level of Daas, etc.
The seven shepherds have both senses: they feed others and are fed themselves. Avraham, rooted in Supernal Chesed, gives love to the people of Israel; Moshe gives them Daas, knowledge of G‑d.
The paragraph gives the second meaning of “shepherd” and begins to show how each shepherd feeds Israel from his own quality.
Marei mekomos
- 1והאתונות רועות על ידיהן · Job 1:14
- 2אברהם אוהבי · Isaiah 41:8
32ונקרא רעיא מהימנא שמפרנס את האמונה על ידי שממשיך דעת ה׳. ויעקב משפיע רחמים. ואמנם
And he is called the Faithful Shepherd, for he sustains faith by drawing down the knowledge of G‑d. And Yaakov bestows compassion. And indeed,
Moshe is called the “Faithful Shepherd” because he nourishes Israel’s faith by giving them knowledge of G‑d. Yaakov gives them compassion.
הנה עי״ז שמפרנסים לכנס״י הם מתפרנסים ג״כ כי מודעת זאת שא״ס ב״ה מרומם ומתנשא לאין קץ מבחי׳ חכמה ומדות כמאמר דלאו מכל אינון מדות איהו כלל.
through their sustaining the Community of Israel they too are sustained. For it is known that the Infinite One, blessed be He, is exalted and uplifted without end above the level of Chochmah and the emotive attributes, as the saying goes, “He is not any of these attributes at all.”
By feeding Israel, the shepherds are fed too. G‑d Himself is infinitely above wisdom and the emotional attributes; as Tikkunei Zohar says, He is none of these attributes at all.
The paragraph completes the shepherds’ giving and introduces the idea that they are nourished by it, starting from the principle that G‑d is above all the attributes.
The Zohar calls Moshe “ra’aya mehemna,” which can mean both “faithful shepherd” and “shepherd of faith.” The point about the Infinite being above the attributes prepares the next step: the light enters the attributes only in response to human service.
33וכדי שיומשך גילוי אור א״ס ב״ה במדות עליונות הוא כפום עובדיהון דב״נ שע״י אתעדל״ת באהבה
And for the revelation of the Infinite Light, blessed be He, to be drawn into the Supernal attributes, it is according to the deeds of human beings: through an arousal from below in love,
Because G‑d is above the attributes, His light enters them according to human deeds. When people arouse love from below, a response comes from above.
then, “as water [reflects] face to face,” there is also drawn above a revelation of the Infinite Light, blessed be He, in the attribute of love and kindness, so that it is “I have loved you, etc.”
As water reflects a face, so G‑d’s love answers human love: the Infinite Light is revealed in the Supernal attribute of love and kindness, “I have loved you.”
ונמצא ע״י שהשבעה רועים משפיעים אהוי״ר לנש״י עי״ז האהוי״ר שמתעורר בנש״י נמשך תוספת אור וגילוי מא״ס ב״ה בהמדות עליונות
Thus, through the seven shepherds bestowing love and awe upon the souls of Israel, through the love and awe aroused in the souls of Israel, an additional light and revelation from the Infinite One, blessed be He, is drawn into the Supernal attributes,
So when the shepherds awaken love and awe in Israel, that love and awe draws extra light from the Infinite into the Supernal attributes.
שהם שרש בחינת הרועים והרי א״כ הם מתפרנסים עי״ז כו׳. וזהו אכלו רעים3 שהם הרועים שהם רעים למקום.
which are the root of the level of the shepherds; and so they are sustained through this, etc. And this is [the meaning of] “Eat, friends (re’im)”: they are the shepherds (ro’im), who are friends of the Omnipresent.
Those Supernal attributes are the shepherds’ own root, so the shepherds are nourished in turn. The Song of Songs says “Eat, friends (re’im)”; the shepherds (ro’im) are G‑d’s friends.
The paragraph explains how the shepherds are nourished: the love and awe they awaken in Israel draws new light into the Supernal attributes, their own root.
The verse “as water reflects face to face” is the classic Chassidic source for the mirroring of love between G‑d and the soul. Here it explains why teaching others feeds the teacher: the light his students draw down reaches his own root.
Marei mekomos
- 1כמים הפנים · Proverbs 27:19
- 2אהבתי אתכם · Malachi 1:2
- 3אכלו רעים · Song of Songs 5:1
34והנה כמו״כ יש למעלה ג״כ כמאמר ישראל מפרנסין לאביהם שבשמים1 כו׳ שפרנסה זו הוא שיומשך אור א״ס להיות בבחינת כמראה אדם2 והיינו ע״י התורה
Now likewise there is [such sustenance] above as well, as the saying goes, “Israel sustains their Father in Heaven, etc.” This sustenance is that the Infinite Light be drawn to be in the level of “like the appearance of a man,” and that is through the Torah,
There is also “sustenance” above: the Midrash says Israel sustains their Father in Heaven. This means drawing the Infinite Light into the form “like the appearance of a man,” the human-like structure of the Sefiros, through Torah.
וכמ״ש לכו לחמו בלחמי3 שהתורה היא ג״כ בחי׳ לחמי כביכול דכמו שע״י הלחם יחיה האדם ותתחבר נשמתו עם גופו כך הוא המשכת אוא״ס ע״י התורה שהיא בחי׳ ח״ע שבה שורה אוא״ס ב״ה ובה
as it is written, “Come, eat of My bread,” for the Torah too is the level of “My bread,” as it were. For just as through bread a person lives and his soul is joined with his body, so is the drawing down of the Infinite Light through the Torah, which is the level of Supernal Chochmah, in which the Infinite Light, blessed be He, rests; and in it
The Torah is called G‑d’s “bread.” Bread binds a person’s soul to his body; Torah, which is Supernal Chochmah where the Infinite Light rests, draws that light down.
ועל ידה נמשך ומתלבש במדות חסד דרועא ימינא כו׳ וגם נמשך מזה מזון לנפש כמ״ש ותורתך בתוך מעי.4
and through it [the light] is drawn and clothed in the attributes, Chesed being the right arm, etc. And from this, too, nourishment is drawn for the soul, as it is written, “and Your Torah is within my innards.”
Through Torah the light enters the attributes, such as Chesed, “the right arm.” The Torah also becomes food for the soul, as the Psalm says, “Your Torah is within my innards.”
The paragraph applies the idea of nourishment above: Torah is G‑d’s “bread,” drawing the Infinite Light into the attributes, and also food for the soul.
“Like the appearance of a man” is from Ezekiel’s vision of the Chariot; in Kabbalah it denotes the Sefiros arranged in the image of a person. Bread joins soul and body; so Torah joins the Infinite Light to the Sefiros.
Marei mekomos
- 1ישראל מפרנסין לאביהם שבשמים · Zohar III, 7b
- 2כמראה אדם · Ezekiel 1:26
- 3לכו לחמו בלחמי · Proverbs 9:5
- 4ותורתך בתוך מעי · Psalms 40:9
35והנה בחי׳ זו של הרועים היא המשכה בבחי׳ פנימית שזהו ענין ותורתך בתוך מעי1 וכמו השגת התורה שיהיה מושג ונתפס בשכלו פסק הלכה
Now this level of the shepherds is a drawing-down in an inward way; this is the meaning of “and Your Torah is within my innards,” as with the comprehension of Torah, that a ruling of law be grasped and held by one’s intellect,
The shepherds’ way of giving is inward: it enters a person like food. This is how Torah study works: one understands a halachic ruling so that it is held within one’s mind.
וכן בהתבוננות שיהיה מושג גדולת הבורא ית׳ כמ״ש וידעת היום2 כו׳ דע את אלקי אביך3 כו׳ ולפי השכל כך יהיה האהבה כו׳.
and likewise in contemplation, that the greatness of the Creator, blessed be He, be grasped, as it is written, “Know this day, etc.,” “Know the G‑d of your father, etc.”; and as the intellect is, so will the love be, etc.
Contemplation works the same way: one grasps G‑d’s greatness with the mind, as the verses “Know this day” and “Know the G‑d of your father” command. The love that follows matches the depth of understanding.
The paragraph defines the shepherds’ level as inward giving, through understanding Torah and contemplating G‑d’s greatness, which produces love in proportion to comprehension.
Tanya chapter 5 explains that when a person grasps a halachah, his mind encompasses it and is encompassed by it; since the halachah is G‑d’s wisdom and will, he is united with G‑d. Likkutei Torah, Re’eh contrasts Torah, inner food, with mitzvos, encompassing garments.
Marei mekomos
- 1ותורתך בתוך מעי · Psalms 40:9
- 2וידעת היום · Deuteronomy 4:39
- 3דע את אלקי אביך · I Chronicles 28:9
36וזהו כמשל הרועה שמאכיל ומשקה את הצאן שזהו השפעת החיות בפנימיות וכן בכל דור הם ראשי אלפי ישראל המלמדים אותם תורה.
And this is like the analogy of the shepherd who feeds and waters the sheep, which is the bestowal of life-force inwardly. And so in every generation there are the heads of the thousands of Israel who teach them Torah.
The shepherd feeds and waters his flock: he gives them life from within. In every generation the leaders who teach Israel Torah play this role.
וכמאמר משה שפיר קאמרת1 שנק׳ רבא משה ע״ש שהיה מלמד תורה כו׳ וכן מה שהרועים מתפרנסים עי״ז הוא ג״כ השגה בפנימיות וכמו ע״ד ומתלמידי יותר מכולם.2
And as in the saying “Moshe, you have spoken well,” in which Rava is called Moshe because he taught Torah, etc. And likewise, what the shepherds are sustained by through this is also an inward apprehension, in the manner of “and from my students more than from all.”
The Talmud uses “Moshe” as a title of honour for a great teacher of Torah. The teachers too gain inward understanding through teaching, as the Sage said, “from my students I learned more than from all.”
The paragraph applies the shepherd image to the Torah teachers of each generation, who give inward understanding and also gain it by teaching.
Marei mekomos
- 1משה שפיר קאמרת · Shabbat 101b:3
- 2ומתלמידי יותר מכולם · Taanit 7a:12–13
37וכן למעלה מעלה הוא גילוי אוא״ס בח״ע שזהו ענין אכלו רעים כו׳. אך ענין הנסיכי אדם
And likewise, far above, it is the revelation of the Infinite Light in Supernal Chochmah; this is the meaning of “Eat, friends, etc.” But the matter of the princes of men
At the highest level, this mutual nourishment is the revelation of the Infinite Light in Supernal Chochmah, the meaning of “Eat, friends.” Now the Alter Rebbe turns to the princes of men.
היינו שאינן בחי׳ רועים ומלמדים לישראל כמשה והאבות רק הם צדיקים תמימים כמו ישי שמת רק בעטיו של נחש.1
is that they are not in the category of shepherds and teachers of Israel like Moshe and the Patriarchs; rather, they are perfectly righteous, like Yishai, who died only because of the counsel of the serpent.
The princes are not shepherds and teachers like Moshe and the Patriarchs. They are perfectly righteous people, like Yishai, King David’s father, who the Talmud says died only because death entered the world through the serpent, not for any sin of his own.
The paragraph closes the discussion of the shepherds and introduces the princes of men as the perfectly righteous, who do not teach others.
Marei mekomos
- 1ישי שמת רק בעטיו של נחש · Bava Batra 17a:6
And we do not find this even in Moshe, the Faithful Shepherd. And yet Moshe is “our teacher,” and it is written, “Remember the Torah of Moshe.”
Even Moshe, the Faithful Shepherd, is not said to have died only through the serpent’s counsel, without any sin of his own. Yet Moshe is “our teacher,” and the Torah bears his name.
משא״כ בישי שלא היה רועה ע״ד משה כו׳ ואעפ״כ נמצא בו מעלה יתירה שהיה תמים עד שמת רק בעטיו של נחש כו׳.
Which is not so with Yishai, who was not a shepherd in the manner of Moshe, etc.; and nevertheless there is found in him a superior quality, that he was perfect, to the point that he died only because of the counsel of the serpent, etc.
Yishai was not a shepherd-teacher like Moshe. Yet he had a quality of his own: he was so perfect that he died only because death entered the world through the serpent.
ומהם נמשך ג״כ כח לנש״י בעבודה בדרך בחי׳ מקיף מה שאין כן מהרועים נמשך בבחי׳ פנימיות ונק׳ מזון כנ״ל.
And from them too strength is drawn to the souls of Israel in [divine] service, in the manner of an encompassing [light]; whereas from the shepherds it is drawn inwardly, and is called food, as explained above.
The princes also give strength to Israel’s service, but as an encompassing influence. The shepherds give inwardly, like food, as explained above.
אבל מהנסיכים נמשך רק בבחי׳ מקיף. וכמו הנסיך שהוא ענין מלוכה שהוא בחי׳ מקיף ששמו נק׳ על האנשים שבמדינתו כו׳.
But from the princes it is drawn only in the manner of an encompassing [light]. Like a prince, which is a matter of kingship, which is the level of an encompassing [light], for his name is called upon the people of his country, etc.,
A prince’s influence is like kingship: the king’s name rests over all the people of his land, encompassing them without entering them.
ואינו השפעה בפנימיות ממש (רק הוא עד״מ כמו אחד מתפעל מתפלת אדם צדיק המתפלל בדו״ר ומס״נ שעי״ז מתפעל גם הוא.
and it is not an actually inward bestowal (but it is, for example, like one who is moved by the prayer of a righteous man who prays with love and awe and self-sacrifice, so that through this he too is moved.
An example: someone watching a righteous person pray with love, awe and self-sacrifice is moved by it. He has been influenced, but not by being taught.
והיא הארה מבחינת המקיף שהרי לא קבל ממנו בפנימית השכלה וחכמה ע״י דבור שהוא השפעה בפנימית כ״א שנתפעל מצדקתו והרי צדקתו ואהוי״ר שלו הוא בבחינת ריחוק ממנו בחי׳ מקיף)
And this is an illumination from the level of the encompassing [light], for he has not received from him inwardly understanding and wisdom through speech, which is an inward bestowal; rather, he was moved by his righteousness, and his righteousness and his love and awe are at a distance from him, the level of an encompassing [light].)
He received no understanding through words, which would be inward giving. He was simply moved by the righteous man’s holiness, which remains beyond him; that is an encompassing influence.
אך נודע שהמקיף הוא מבחי׳ גבוה יותר מהפנימי כי המקיפים שרשן מסוכ״ע והפנימים מבחי׳ ממכ״ע.
But it is known that the encompassing is from a higher level than the inward, for the encompassing [lights] are rooted in the light that encompasses all worlds, and the inward ones in the level of the light that fills all worlds.
Yet the encompassing is higher than the inward. Encompassing lights come from the light that surrounds all worlds, inward lights from the light that fills them.
וכעד״ז ארז״ל גדולה שמושה יותר מלימודה.23 הגם שהלימוד הוא השפעה פנימית והשימוש הוא חיצונית אעפ״כ מקבל עי״ז יותר יראת שמים כו׳.
And in a similar way our Sages said, “Greater is attending [upon the Torah’s scholars] than studying it.” Although study is an inward bestowal and attendance is external, nevertheless through it one receives more fear of Heaven, etc.
The Talmud says that attending a Torah scholar is greater than studying with him. Study is inward giving and attendance external, yet attendance brings more fear of Heaven.
והוא כענין המשכה בבחי׳ מקיף (כי מה שיכול להיות נמשך בשכל התלמיד בבחי׳ פנימיות אינו רק הארה לבד משכל הרב. ולכן לא קאים אינש אדעתא דרביה4 כו׳)
And it is like a drawing-down in the manner of an encompassing [light] (for what can be drawn into the student’s intellect inwardly is only a glimmer of the teacher’s intellect; and therefore “a person does not grasp his teacher’s mind, etc.”).
Attendance transmits in an encompassing way. What the student absorbs through study is only a glimmer of the teacher’s mind; as the Talmud says, a person does not fully grasp his teacher’s mind (for forty years).
ולכן נאמר אשור כי יבא כו׳ והקמונו עליו שבעה רועים ושמונה נסיכי אדם שע״י שמונה נס״א ידחו הרע בבחי׳ א׳ יותר מע״י הרועים כי הרועים שהם המשכה בבחי׳ פנימיות
And therefore it says, “When Assyria comes, etc., we will raise up against him seven shepherds and eight princes of men”: for through the eight princes of men the evil will be repelled, in one respect, more than through the shepherds; for the shepherds, which are a drawing-down in an inward way,
This is why Michah names both shepherds and princes against Assyria. In one respect the princes repel evil better than the shepherds.
הנה ברבוי השתלשלות המדרגות יוכל לימשך מזה יניקה לחיצונים עד״מ מצפורני ידים לא כאברהם שיצא ממנו כו׳.
through the many levels of the chain of descent, nurture can be drawn from it to the external forces, as, for example, from the fingernails; not like Avraham, from whom came, etc.
Inward light descends through many levels, and at its far edges the forces of evil can draw nourishment from it, as from the “fingernails,” the outermost part of the body. So too, from Avraham came (Yishmael).
The paragraph defines the princes’ influence as encompassing, higher than the shepherds’ inward teaching, and explains why it is more effective against evil.
The Kehot note cites a maamar of 5713 on the Talmud’s statement that a student grasps his teacher’s mind only after forty years: until then he grasps only its outer aspect. The “fingernails” are the Kabbalistic image for the outermost edge of holiness, where the external forces draw nurture.
Marei mekomos
- 1זכרו תורת משה · Malachi 3:22
- 2גדולה שמושה יותר מלימודה · Berakhot 7b:26
- 3גדולה שמושה יותר מלימודה · Zohar, Vayera 1:14–5:78
- 4לא קאים אינש אדעתא דרבי׳ · Avodah Zarah 5b:2
39וכן בהשגת התורה ארז״ל למשמאילים בה1 כו׳. וכל האומר אין לי אלא תורה2 כו׳. וצ״ל ג״כ המשכה משמונה נס״א בחי׳ מקיפים שהמקיף מסמא עיני החיצונים כו׳. וזהו ענין תורה וגמ״ח שע״י התורה נמשך בחי׳ מזון.
And likewise in the comprehension of Torah our Sages said, “For those who go to its left, etc.,” and “Whoever says, ‘I have only Torah,’ etc.” And there must also be a drawing-down from the eight princes of men, the level of encompassing [lights], for the encompassing [light] blinds the eyes of the external forces, etc. And this is the matter of Torah and acts of kindness: through the Torah the level of food is drawn.
Torah study too needs the princes’ encompassing light. The Talmud warns that for those who go to the Torah’s “left” it can be harmful, and that one who says “I have only Torah” lacks even Torah. The encompassing light “blinds” the external forces so they cannot draw from it. That is why Torah needs acts of kindness: Torah gives inward “food.”
The paragraph shows that even Torah study, an inward light, needs the encompassing light of the princes, which corresponds to acts of kindness.
The pairing of Torah with acts of kindness is from the Talmud (Yevamos 109b), where one who has only Torah is said not to have even Torah. Here the kindness is the encompassing garment that protects the inner light of Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1למשמאילים בה · Shabbat 63a
- 2וכל האומר אין לי אלא תורה · Yevamot 109b:4–5
40וזהו בחי׳ הרועים. וע״י גמ״ח נמשך בחי׳ לבוש ומקיף וזהו בחי׳ ההמשכה שע״י נס״א גדולה שמושה כו׳.
And this is the level of the shepherds. And through acts of kindness the level of a garment and an encompassing [light] is drawn, and this is the level of the drawing-down through the princes of men: “Greater is attending, etc.”
Torah is the shepherds’ level. Acts of kindness draw down a garment, an encompassing light; that is the princes’ level, like “attending is greater.”
ויובן יותר ענין ההפרש בין הרועים לנס״א1 ע״ד שמצינו בר׳ יוחנן בן זכאי שהיה שר
And the difference between the shepherds and the princes of men will be understood further in the manner of what we find with Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai, who was a prince
The difference between shepherds and princes is illustrated by Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai, the leading teacher of his generation.
התורה המלמד תורה לישראל ועכ״ז אמר לר׳ חנינא בן דוסא2 בקש עלי רחמים שתפלתו גדולה יותר הרבה משלו עד שאלמלי הטיח ריב״ז כו׳
of the Torah, who taught Torah to Israel; and nevertheless he said to Rabbi Chanina ben Dosa, “Ask for mercy for me,” for his prayer was much greater than his own, to the point that “had Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai pressed [his head between his knees], etc.”
Though he taught all Israel Torah, he asked Rabbi Chanina ben Dosa to pray for his son. His own prayer would not have helped, even had he pressed his head between his knees all day.
ומר״ח בן דוסא לא נמצא שהיה מלמד תורה ע״ד ריב״ז ולא נמצא משמו דינים במשנה.
And of Rabbi Chanina ben Dosa we do not find that he taught Torah in the manner of Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai, and no laws in his name are found in the Mishnah.
Rabbi Chanina ben Dosa, by contrast, is not known as a teacher, and no laws in the Mishnah are taught in his name.
The paragraph links Torah to the shepherds and kindness to the princes, and introduces the Talmudic contrast between Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai and Rabbi Chanina ben Dosa.
In the Talmud, Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai explains the difference: Rabbi Chanina is like a servant before the king, who enters freely, while he is like a minister. A maamar of 5669 cited by the note says the seven shepherds come from inner light and the eight princes from encompassing light.
Marei mekomos
- 1ההפרש בין הרועים לנס״א · ראה ד״ה למען דעת תרס״ט ע׳ לט דז׳ רועים היו מבחי׳ אור פנימי וח׳ נס״א היינו שהן מבחי׳ האו״מ.
- 2בר׳ יוחנן בן זכאי . . אמר לר׳ חנינא בן דוסא · Berakhot 34b:28
41וזהו ע״ד ההפרש שבין הרועים לנס״א כו׳ כי ריב״ז היה רועה ומפרנס לישראל כמו מרע״ה.
And this is like the difference between the shepherds and the princes of men, etc.; for Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai was a shepherd and sustainer of Israel, like Moshe our teacher, peace be upon him.
This is the difference between shepherds and princes: Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai fed Israel with Torah, like Moshe.
ורחב״ד לא היה בו בחי׳ זו אבל היה צדיק תמים בלי שום דופי עד שארז״ל שלא נברא העוה״ב
And Rabbi Chanina ben Dosa did not have this quality, but he was perfectly righteous without any blemish, to the point that our Sages said that the World to Come was created
Rabbi Chanina ben Dosa lacked that role but was perfectly righteous, so much that the Talmud says the World to Come was created for him.
אלא בשבילו1 והיו מקבלים ממנו נש״י דרכי העבודה והחסידות ע״ד גדולה שימושה כו׳ ותפלתו היתה נשמעת יותר מריב״ז
only for his sake; and the souls of Israel received from him the ways of divine service and piety, in the manner of “Greater is attending it, etc.”; and his prayer was heard more than [that of] Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai.
People learned from him the ways of service and piety by observing him, as attendance teaches. His prayer was answered more than Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai’s.
וכן נאמר והקימונו עליו שבעה רועים ושמונה נס״א2 שבחי׳ נס״א מועיל יותר נגד בחי׳ אשור
And so it says, “we will raise up against him seven shepherds and eight princes of men,” for the level of the princes of men is more effective against the level of Assyria
That is why Michah names the princes against Assyria: they are more effective against such an enemy.
כי יבא כו׳ לפי שממשיכים מבחי׳ סוכ״ע וכמו תפלת ר״ח ב״ד להפוך הטבע כו׳ שהוא ע״י המשכה מבחי׳ סוכ״ע שלמעלה מסדר והדרגת ההשתלשלות כו׳:
“when it comes, etc.,” because they draw down from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds; like the prayer of Rabbi Chanina ben Dosa to overturn nature, etc., which is through a drawing-down from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds, which is above the order and gradation of the chain of descent, etc.
The princes draw from the light that encompasses all worlds, above the ordered chain of creation. That is how Rabbi Chanina’s prayer could change nature: his miracles came from a light above the natural order.
The paragraph applies the contrast: the shepherd teaches, while the prince, perfectly righteous, draws an encompassing light above nature, and is therefore more powerful against the forces of evil.
Marei mekomos
- 1שלא נברא העוה״ב אלא בשבילו · Berakhot 61b
- 2והקימונו עליו שבעה רועים ושמונה נס״א · Micah 5:4
42וזהו ענין נרות דחנוכה. שטמאו כל השמנים שבהיכל מצד תגבורת חכמה דקליפה. לכן רצו להשכיחם תורתך כו׳.
And this is the matter of the Chanukah lamps. For they defiled all the oils in the Sanctuary through the strength of the wisdom of kelipah; therefore “they sought to make them forget Your Torah, etc.”
Now the Chanukah lights. The Greeks defiled the Sanctuary’s oils through the power of the “wisdom of kelipah,” Greek wisdom. They sought, as the Chanukah prayer says, to make Israel forget the Torah.
וע״כ הוצרך להמשיך מבחי׳ שלמעלה מהחכמה1 דקדושה והוא מבחי׳ מקיפים עליונים. וזהו פך של שמן שהיה חתום בחותמו של כה״ג שהוא בחי׳ ורב חסד2 כו׳
And therefore it was necessary to draw down from the level that is above the Chochmah of holiness, which is from the level of the supernal encompassing [lights]. And this is the cruse of oil that was sealed with the seal of the High Priest, which is the level of “and abundant in kindness,” etc.
Since the attack came through wisdom, the remedy had to come from above holy Chochmah, from the supernal encompassing lights. The one cruse sealed by the High Priest stands for “abundant in kindness,” a kindness beyond measure.
(ולפי שהוא מבחי׳ מקיף נמשך ונשפל גם למטה להדליק גם עתה בדורותינו שאין בהמ״ק קיים משא״כ בבהמ״ק היה ז׳ נרות מבחי׳ ז׳ רועים אלא שהיה הגילוי ממש בבחי׳ פנימית כמאמר עדות היא לבאי עולם3 כו׳.
(And because it is from the level of an encompassing [light], it is drawn and lowered below as well, to be lit even now in our generations when the Holy Temple does not stand; whereas in the Holy Temple there were seven lamps, from the level of the seven shepherds, except that the revelation was actual, in an inward way, as the saying goes, “It is a testimony to all who come into the world, etc.”
Because the Chanukah light is encompassing, it reaches down even to our time, when there is no Temple. The Temple’s seven lamps came from the seven shepherds and shone inwardly and openly, a testimony to all the world.
ועמ״ש לקמן ע״פ כי אתה נרי הוי״ה4 והוי״ה יגיה חשכי.5 שם הוי״ה הראשון הוא בבחי׳ השתלשלות וממנו נמשך בחי׳ אתה נרי.
And see what is written below on “For You are my lamp, Havayah, and Havayah illuminates my darkness.” The first Name Havayah is in the level of the chain of descent, and from it is drawn the level of “You are my lamp”;
The verse “You are my lamp, Havayah, and Havayah illuminates my darkness” has two Names. The first Havayah is G‑dliness within the chain of worlds, the source of “You are my lamp.”
והיינו הנרות דמקדש כו׳. ושם הוי״ה השני הוא מבחי׳ סוכ״ע שלמעלה מהשתלשלות ומזה נמשך בחי׳ יגיה חשכי והן הן נרות דחנוכה.
that is, the lamps of the Sanctuary, etc. And the second Name Havayah is from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds, which is above the chain of descent, and from it is drawn the level of “illuminates my darkness”; and these are the Chanukah lamps.
That first level is the Temple lamps. The second Havayah is from the light that encompasses the worlds, above the chain of descent, and it “illuminates my darkness”: these are the Chanukah lights.
ועד״ז הוא ענין ההפרש בין בחי׳ שבעה רועים לבחי׳ שמונה נס״א6 כי על ידי שבעה רועים נמשך המשכת המזון לכנ״י בחי׳ ותורתך בתוך מעי שהוא מה שיכול להיות נמשך בפנימית זהו מבחי׳ שם הוי״ה הנמשך בעולמות אבי״ע.
And in this way is the difference between the level of the seven shepherds and the level of the eight princes of men: for through the seven shepherds is drawn the drawing-down of food to the Community of Israel, the level of “and Your Torah is within my innards,” which is what can be drawn inwardly; this is from the level of the Name Havayah that is drawn into the worlds of Atzilus, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.
So too the shepherds and princes: the shepherds give “food,” Torah that enters within, from the Havayah that is drawn into the worlds of Atzilus, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.
אבל ע״י נס״א נמשכים בחי׳ מקיפים והוא מבחי׳ שם הוי״ה שלמעלה מגדר ההתלבשות בהעולמות אלא שמאיר בבחי׳ מקיף וכענין תפלת רחב״ד להפוך הטבע כו׳
But through the princes of men encompassing [lights] are drawn, and it is from the level of the Name Havayah that is above the bounds of being clothed in the worlds, but shines as an encompassing [light], like the prayer of Rabbi Chanina ben Dosa to overturn nature, etc.,
The princes draw encompassing lights from the Havayah that is above being clothed in the worlds, the power behind Rabbi Chanina’s prayer to change nature.
כנ״ל והוא הנמשך ע״י מעשה המצות שהן המשכות בחי׳ מקיפים כי המצות הן נק׳ מצות המלך.7 ועיין בד״ה מזמור שיר חנוכת הבית89 בענין מזון לבוש כו׳.
as explained above. And it is what is drawn through the deed of the mitzvos, which are drawings-down of the level of encompassing [lights], for the mitzvos are called “the King’s commands.” And see the discourse beginning “A Psalm, a song for the dedication of the House,” on the matter of food and garment, etc.
The mitzvos too draw encompassing lights: they are “the King’s commands,” above understanding. A maamar in Likkutei Torah discusses food (Torah) and garment (mitzvos).
ולכן בחי׳ משיח הוא ג״כ מנס״א10 כי במשיח נאמר והריחו. מורח ודאין.11 וריח הוא בחי׳ מקיף ריחא דלבושייכו משא״כ הרועים הוא בחי׳ מזון כו׳. ולקמן יבואר דבמשיח יש ב׳ הבחי׳):12
And therefore the level of Mashiach too is from the princes of men, for of Mashiach it is said, “And he shall be imbued [with the scent],” [meaning] “he smells and judges”; and smell is the level of an encompassing [light], “the scent of their garments,” whereas the shepherds are the level of food, etc. And below it will be explained that in Mashiach there are both levels.)
Mashiach is counted among the princes. Isaiah says he will judge by “scent”; the Talmud reads it as “he smells and judges.” Smell is an encompassing sense, the scent of garments, while the shepherds give food. Later the Alter Rebbe will show that Mashiach has both qualities.
The paragraph applies the whole analysis to Chanukah: against Greek wisdom the remedy had to come from encompassing light above wisdom, the level of the princes, which is why the Chanukah lights shine even in exile.
The Rebbe notes (in Sefer HaMaamarim 5710) that the Talmud counts Mashiach among the princes because that is his main quality, though he has both. The Rambam (Kings 11:3) cites the Talmud’s test of Mashiach by “scent.” The Rebbe’s maamarim of 5738, 5746 and 5748 develop why the remedy had to come from above wisdom.
Marei mekomos
- 1וע״כ הוצרך להמשיך מבחי׳ שלמעלה מהחכמה · ראה ד״ה ת״ר מצות נר חנוכה תשל״ח ס״ב [סה״מ מלוקט ח״ב ע׳ יח]. ד״ה ואתה ברחמיך תשמ״ח ס״ד [סה״מ מלוקט ח״ד ע׳ קא]. ד״ה ביום השמיני תשמ״ו ס״ו [סה״מ מלוקט ח״ד ע׳ קיב].
- 2ורב חסד · Exodus 34:6
- 3עדות היא לבאי עולם · Shabbat 22b:2
- 4ועמ״ש לקמן ע״פ כי אתה נרי הוי״ה · לקמן מא, א.
- 5כי אתה נרי הוי״ה והוי״ה יגיה חשכי · II Samuel 22:29
- 6ההפרש בין בחי׳ שבעה רועים לבחי׳ שמונה נס״א · מובא באוה״ת נ״ך כרך א ע׳ תעט.
- 7המצות הן נק׳ מצות המלך · ראה לקו״ת פ׳ במדבר ביאור לד״ה וידבר משה גו׳ אנכי ס״ב. ופ׳ ואתחנן ד״ה למען תירא. וראה לקמן לה, ב.
- 8בד״ה מזמור שיר חנוכת הבית · לקו״ת ס״פ ברכה.
- 9מזמור שיר חנוכת הבית · Psalms 30:1
- 10משיח הוא ג״כ מנס״א · בד״ה למען דעת תרס״ט (סה״מ תרס״ט ע׳ לט) מציין לכאן.
- 11והריחו מורח ודאין · Isaiah 11:3
- 12דבמשיח יש ב׳ הבחי׳ · בסוכה נב, ב נחשב בנסיכים, י״ל מפני שזהו העיקר בו (הערת כ״ק אדמו״ר זי״ע בספר המאמרים תש״י ע׳ 255).
Beis Shammai and Beis Hillel ¶43–48
43ובזה יובן הגמ׳ בש״א יום ראשון מדליק שמונה מכאן ואילך פוחת והולך.1 וטעמא דב״ש דיליף מפרי החג שיום ראשון מקריב י״ג מכאן ואילך פוחת והולך כו׳.
And through this the Gemara will be understood: Beis Shammai say, on the first day one lights eight; from then on one goes on decreasing. And the reason of Beis Shammai is that they derive it from the bullocks of the Festival, where on the first day one offers thirteen, and from then on one goes on decreasing, etc.
With all this in place, the Alter Rebbe returns to the Talmud’s dispute. Beis Shammai model the Chanukah lights on the Sukkos bullocks: thirteen on the first day, decreasing each day after.
ובה״א יום ראשון מדליק א׳ מכאן ואילך מוסיף והולך כו׳. כי הנה ענין פרי החג הוא ג״כ המשכת מקיפים עליונים כי סכות הוא התגלות המקיפים כמ״ש כי גבר עלינו חסדו.2
And Beis Hillel say, on the first day one lights one; from then on one goes on increasing, etc. For the bullocks of the Festival, too, are the drawing down of supernal encompassing [lights], for Sukkos is the revelation of the encompassing [lights], as it is written, “For His kindness has prevailed over us.”
Beis Hillel increase from one. Like Chanukah, the Sukkos offerings draw down supernal encompassing lights; Sukkos is the festival of the encompassing sukkah, of G‑d’s kindness that “has prevailed over us.”
The paragraph returns to the opening dispute and establishes the common ground: both Sukkos and Chanukah draw down encompassing lights.
The sukkah itself, surrounding the person, is the classic image of an encompassing light in Chassidus.
Marei mekomos
- 1בש״א יום ראשון מדליק שמונה מכאן ואילך פוחת והולך · Shabbat 21b:5
- 2כי גבר עלינו חסדו · Psalms 117:2
44וע״י המשכה זו מתבררים ג״כ הע׳ שרים ונהפכים ליבטל באור זה. וזהו הללו את1 ה׳ כל גוים כו׳ כי גבר עלינו חסדו.
And through this drawing-down the seventy princes are also refined and transformed, to become nullified in this light. And this is [the meaning of] “Praise G‑d, all nations, etc., for His kindness has prevailed over us.”
The light of Sukkos refines even the “seventy princes,” the spiritual powers over the seventy nations, so that they are nullified in it. So the Psalm calls on all nations to praise G‑d, because His kindness to Israel has prevailed.
ולכן מתחיל בי״ג פרים כנגד י״ג מדה״ר שהם מקיפים כנודע. ואח״כ הולכין ומתמעטין כי כיון שכבר נבררו כמה בחי׳ ע״י המשכה שביום ראשון ע״כ א״צ עוד להארה גדולה כ״כ כיום ראשון כו׳.
And therefore it begins with thirteen bullocks, corresponding to the thirteen attributes of mercy, which are encompassing [lights], as is known. And afterwards they go on diminishing, for since several levels have already been refined through the drawing-down of the first day, there is no longer need for so great an illumination as on the first day, etc.
The bullocks begin at thirteen, matching the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy, which are encompassing lights. They decrease because once much has been refined on the first day, less light is needed afterward.
The paragraph explains why the Sukkos bullocks decrease: the great encompassing light of the first day refines the seventy nations’ powers, so less is needed each day after.
The seventy bullocks of Sukkos are traditionally linked to the seventy nations. In Chassidic thought their “princes” are spiritual powers whose refinement means their submission to holiness; this is a matter of spiritual forces, not of a people’s worth.
Marei mekomos
- 1הללו את ה׳ כל גוים · Psalms 117:1
45והנה בחנוכה ממשיכים ג״כ בחי׳ מקיפים הנ״ל שעי״ז יהיו נדחים הקליפות. אך בחנוכה הוא בבחי׳ מלחמה.
Now on Chanukah too these encompassing [lights] are drawn down, so that through them the kelipos will be repelled. But on Chanukah it is in the mode of war,
On Chanukah, too, encompassing lights are drawn down to repel the kelipos, the forces of concealment. But on Chanukah this happens through war.
וכמ״ש סבוני כו׳ בשם1 ה׳ כי אמילם כו׳ והיינו ג״כ ע״י המקיפים דוקא. וזהו טוב לחסות בהוי״ה מבטוח2 כו׳ כמ״ש במ״א.
as it is written, “They surrounded me, etc.; in the name of G‑d I will cut them down, etc.”; and that too is specifically through the encompassing [lights]. And this is [the meaning of] “It is better to take refuge in Havayah than to trust, etc.,” as explained elsewhere.
The Psalm says, “They surrounded me… in the name of G‑d I will cut them down.” That victory too comes through encompassing light; hence “it is better to take refuge in Havayah,” the Name above nature, than to rely on human power.
The paragraph contrasts Chanukah with Sukkos: both draw encompassing lights, but on Chanukah the forces of evil are repelled through battle.
Marei mekomos
- 1סבוני כו׳ בשם ה׳ כי אמילם · Psalms 118:11
- 2טוב לחסות בהוי״ה מבטוח · Psalms 118:9
46ובסכות להיותו מדאורייתא אינו ע״י מלחמה אלא שנעשו נכנעים ממילא ע״י גילוי זה כו׳. וכיון ששני הענינים הוא המשכת בחי׳ מקיפים ע״כ למדים ב״ש לנרות דחנוכה מפרי החג שמתחלה צ״ל גילוי גדול יותר.
And on Sukkos, since it is from the Torah, it is not through war; rather they become subdued of themselves through this revelation, etc. And since both matters are the drawing down of encompassing [lights], Beis Shammai therefore derive the Chanukah lamps from the bullocks of the Festival: at first there must be a greater revelation,
Sukkos is a Torah festival, so the opposing forces submit of themselves before the revelation, without battle. Since both festivals draw encompassing lights, Beis Shammai derive Chanukah from Sukkos: the greatest light first, then less.
The paragraph explains Beis Shammai’s view: since both festivals draw encompassing light, Chanukah follows the Sukkos pattern of decreasing.
47ואח״כ יהיה מתמעט והולך מטעם הנ״ל בפרי החג. וב״ה סברי מעלין בקודש1 כו׳. פי׳ דלא דמי ללמוד זה מפרי החג.
and afterwards it goes on diminishing, for the reason explained above regarding the bullocks of the Festival. And Beis Hillel hold, “we ascend in holiness, etc.” Meaning: it is not comparable, to learn this from the bullocks of the Festival,
So the lights decrease, as with the bullocks. Beis Hillel hold that we ascend in holiness, because the two cases are not comparable.
כי חג הסכות הוא דאורייתא. ואורייתא מח״ע נפקת2 מלמעלה למטה. ואם כן בא ונמשך הגילוי מצד עצמו מלמעלה למטה.
for the festival of Sukkos is from the Torah, and the Torah comes forth from Supernal Chochmah, from above to below. If so, the revelation comes and is drawn of itself, from above to below.
Sukkos is from the Torah, and the Torah comes forth from Supernal Chochmah, from above downward. So its revelation comes on its own initiative from above.
The paragraph begins Beis Hillel’s reasoning: Sukkos, a Torah festival, is a revelation from above, unlike Chanukah.
A sicha of the Rebbe, cited by the note, explains that in light itself even Beis Shammai would agree one should increase; they decrease only because the Chanukah lights correspond to the Sukkos bullocks, which correspond to the nations.
Marei mekomos
- 1מעלין בקודש · Shabbat 21b:6–7
- 2ואורייתא מח״ע נפקת · Zohar, Yitro 21:378–22:389
Therefore even the highest illumination can come and be drawn at the very beginning, for who can hold back and who can prevent G‑d, may His Name be blessed? “Is the hand of G‑d too short?”
Because a Torah festival is a revelation from G‑d’s side, the highest light can come at once; nothing can hold G‑d back. “Is G‑d’s hand too short?”
משא״כ בחנוכה שהוא מדרבנן שהם המשיכו להיות גילוי זה וא״כ כיון שממשיכים זה מלמטה א״א להגיע ולהמשיך הגילוי הגדול בתחלה כ״א2 מעט מעט. שמתחלה ממשיכים נר א׳.
Which is not so with Chanukah, which is rabbinic: it was they who drew down this revelation. If so, since it is drawn from below, it is impossible to reach and draw down the great revelation at the start, but only little by little: at first one draws down one lamp,
Chanukah is rabbinic: the Sages themselves drew this light down, from below. What is drawn from below cannot reach its height at once; it starts with one light.
ואח״כ מעלין בקודש כו׳ והולך ומוסיף אור כו׳. (ודוגמא לדבר מפסח וספה״ע כי בפסח היה הגילוי באתעדל״ע מצד עצמו שנגלה עליהם ממ״ה כו׳.
and afterwards “we ascend in holiness, etc.,” and the light goes on increasing, etc. (And an example of the matter is Pesach and the Counting of the Omer: for on Pesach the revelation was an arousal from above, of itself, “the King of kings revealed Himself to them, etc.”
Then the light grows, “ascending in holiness.” The Alter Rebbe compares Pesach and the Omer: on Pesach the revelation came from above, unprompted, as the Haggadah says, “the King of kings revealed Himself to them.”
ואח״כ צ״ל וספרתם לכם להפוך המדות ע״י שממשיכים היום יום א׳ לעומר לנה״ב כו׳. ולמחר היום שני ימים. ואין אומרים יום שני אלא שני ימים.
And afterwards there must be “And you shall count for yourselves,” to transform the emotive attributes, by drawing “today is one day of the Omer” into the animal soul, etc. And tomorrow, “today is two days”; and one does not say “the second day,” but “two days.”
Then comes the Counting of the Omer, which refines the emotions by drawing light into the animal soul day by day. The count says “two days,” not “the second day.”
כלומר היום נמשך בחי׳ עליונה יותר הכוללת שני ימים ואח״כ מוסיף והולך אור כו׳. נמצא בספירת העומר שהיא אתערותא דלעילא ע״י אתערותא דלתתא הוא ממשיך מעט מעט והולך ואור כו׳ ב׳ ימים ג׳ ימים כו׳.
That is to say, today a higher level is drawn that includes two days, and afterwards the light goes on increasing, etc. Thus in the Counting of the Omer, which is an arousal from above through an arousal from below, one draws down little by little, and it goes on growing brighter, etc.: two days, three days, etc.
Each day includes the previous ones, so the light keeps growing. The Omer is an arousal from above that comes through arousal from below, so it grows step by step.
וזהו כמו בחנוכה תחלה נר א׳ ואח״כ מוסיף והולך כו׳. אבל בפסח שהיה הגילוי מעצמו הרי כללות האור הנמשך אח״כ בכל ימי העומר היה גילוי זה כולו בעצמו בתחלה כו׳ מטעם הנ״ל.3
And this is like Chanukah: first one lamp, and afterwards it goes on increasing, etc. But on Pesach, when the revelation was of itself, the whole of the light that is drawn afterwards through all the days of the Omer, this entire revelation itself was there at the beginning, etc., for the reason explained above.
That is like Chanukah: one light, then more. But on Pesach, where the revelation came from above, all the light later drawn through the Omer was revealed at the very start.
וגם מזה יובן מ״ש בפע״ח בספה״ע ממשיכים מקיפים דאימא אבל הפנימיים אין בנו כח להמשיך רק בזמן בהמ״ק.
And from this, too, will be understood what is written in Pri Etz Chaim on the Counting of the Omer: that we draw down the encompassing [lights] of Imma, but the inner ones we do not have the power to draw down, except in the time of the Holy Temple.
This explains the Arizal’s teaching in Pri Etz Chaim: during the Omer we draw down the encompassing lights of Imma (Binah), but the inner lights could be drawn only when the Temple stood.
והוא כמ״ש בענין שבעה רועים דהם בחי׳ פנימיים וזה היה במנורה שבבהמ״ק ז׳ קנים. משא״כ עכשיו ממשיכים מבחי׳ המקיפים שהם ח׳ נס״א:)
And this is as explained regarding the seven shepherds, that they are the level of the inner [lights], and this was in the Menorah in the Holy Temple, seven branches; whereas now we draw down from the level of the encompassing [lights], which are the eight princes of men.)
The inner lights are the seven shepherds, the seven-branched Menorah of the Temple. Today we draw the encompassing lights, the eight princes, as in the Chanukah lights.
ובכל הנ״ל יובן ענין קבלת עומ״ש שקדמה לעול מצות4 היינו שהוא בחי׳ בכל מאדך בירור נה״ב נר ה׳ נשמת אדם.5
And through all the above, the matter of accepting the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven, which precedes the yoke of the mitzvos, will be understood: it is the level of “with all your might,” the refinement of the animal soul, “the soul of man is the lamp of G‑d.”
Now the Alter Rebbe draws a lesson for service: accepting the yoke of Heaven comes before accepting the mitzvos. That acceptance is love “with all your might,” the refining of the animal soul: “the soul is the lamp of G‑d.”
ואע״פ שזהו בחי׳ אספקלריא שא״מ הוא קודם לעול מצות עם היות נר מצוה בחי׳ אספקלריא המאירה.
And although this is the level of the speculum that does not shine, it precedes the yoke of the mitzvos, even though “a mitzvah is a lamp” is the level of the luminous speculum.
That is the mirror that does not shine, yet it comes before the mitzvos, which are the luminous speculum.
אך משום שעי״ז יש גילוי בחי׳ עליונה יותר כנ״ל. ועוד שהוא כמו הפתילה ושמן שאין דרך להיות נתלה האור בשמן שהוא נר מצוה.
But [it precedes] because through it there is a revelation of a higher level, as explained above. And further, because it is like the wick and the oil: there is no way for the light to hang on the oil, which is “a mitzvah is a lamp,”
It comes first because it reveals a higher level, as explained, and because the flame cannot catch the oil (the mitzvos) directly.
except by first taking hold on the wick, which is the level of “the lamp of Havayah is the soul of man,” as explained above. (And see what is written on “I saw, and behold, a menorah of gold, etc.”)
The flame must first catch the wick, the soul, “the lamp of Havayah.” The note points to a Likkutei Torah maamar on Zechariah’s vision of a golden menorah.
ולכן ג״כ ספה״ע שהוא זיכוך נה״ב אספקלריא שא״מ קדמה למ״ת דשבועות שהוא נר מצוה. וזהו וספרתם לכם ממחרת השבת.8
And therefore too the Counting of the Omer, which is the refinement of the animal soul, the speculum that does not shine, precedes the Giving of the Torah on Shavuos, which is “a mitzvah is a lamp.” And this is “And you shall count for yourselves from the day after the Sabbath.”
Likewise, the Omer, refining the animal soul, comes before Shavuos and the Torah. The Torah says to count “from the day after the Sabbath.”
כי השבת הוא בחי׳ נר מצוה. אבל בחי׳ קדושתי שלמעלה מקדושתכם נק׳ ממחרת השבת כלומר למעלה מבחי׳ השבת.
For the Sabbath is the level of “a mitzvah is a lamp”; but the level of “My holiness is above your holiness” is called “the day after the Sabbath,” that is, above the level of the Sabbath.
“The Sabbath” stands for the mitzvah as lamp; “the day after the Sabbath” is above it: “My holiness is above your holiness.”
וזהו ענין קבלת עומ״ש דבור אנכי ולא יהיה לך שלפני מצות שבת. והוא ענין וספרתם לכם ספירת העומר זיכוך הנפש כנודע ותקון המדות לאהפכא חשוכא לנהורא:9101112131415
And this is the matter of accepting the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven, the utterances “I am” and “You shall have no [other gods],” which come before the mitzvah of Shabbos. And it is the matter of “And you shall count for yourselves,” the Counting of the Omer, the refinement of the soul, as is known, and the rectification of the emotive attributes, to turn darkness into light.
So at Sinai “I am” and “You shall have no other gods,” acceptance of G‑d’s sovereignty, came before Shabbos. The Omer count refines the soul and corrects the emotions, turning darkness into light.
The paragraph gives Beis Hillel’s reason (a rabbinic light drawn from below must grow step by step), parallels it with Pesach and the Omer, and draws the lesson that accepting G‑d’s sovereignty and refining the animal soul must come first.
The Kehot note quotes the Rebbe’s sicha on “who can prevent G‑d” from Derech Mitzvosecha. In Kabbalah, the Omer’s forty-nine days draw the light of Binah (Imma) into the emotions; Pri Etz Chaim says that in exile only its encompassing aspect can be drawn.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי מי מעכב ומי מונע · ראה דרך מצותיך לד, ב. מובא בלקו״ש חכ״א ע׳ 194.
- 2שו״ה בתחלה כו׳ · ע״כ נמצא בבוך 1223.
- 3מטעם הנ״ל בפרי החג · Shabbat 21b:6–7
- 4קבלת עומ״ש שקדמה לעול מצות · Mishnah Berakhot 2:2
- 5נר ה׳ נשמת אדם · Proverbs 20:27
- 6ע״פ ראיתי והנה מנורת זהב · לקו״ת פ׳ בהעלותך.
- 7ע״פ ראיתי והנה מנורת זהב · Zechariah 4:2
- 8וספרתם לכם ממחרת השבת · Leviticus 23:15
- 9בש״א יום ראשון מדליק שמונה · Shabbat 21b:5
- 10הללו . . כי גבר עלינו חסדו · תהלים קיז.
- 11סבוני כו׳ · Psalms 118:11
- 12טוב לחסות · Psalms 118:9
- 13דלא דמי ללמוד זה מפרי החג · מובא באוה״ת כרך א ע׳ רנט.
- 14ואורייתא מח״ע נפקת · Zohar II, 85a
- 15והיד ה׳ תקצר · Numbers 11:23
The roots of the shepherds and princes ¶49–55
49ולהבין ביאור הדברים הנ״ל בענין שמונה נסיכי אדם. דודאי הרועים הם יותר נעלים מהם במה שהם משפיעים מבחי׳ פנימיות.
And to understand the explanation of the above regarding the eight princes of men: certainly the shepherds are loftier than they, in that they bestow from the level of the inner dimension,
To clarify the princes: the shepherds are certainly greater in one way, because they give inwardly.
משא״כ בנס״א. והיינו לפי שהרועים נשמתם מבחי׳ פנימיות. והנסיכים מבחי׳ חיצוניות (ולכן משה הוא מהרועים. ואליהו מהנסיכים. ונודע דמשה הוא מבחי׳ פנימיות ואליהו מבחי׳ חיצוניות)
which is not so with the princes of men. That is because the souls of the shepherds are from the level of the inner dimension, and the princes from the level of the outer dimension (and therefore Moshe is among the shepherds and Eliyahu among the princes; and it is known that Moshe is from the level of the inner dimension and Eliyahu from the level of the outer dimension).
Their souls come from an inner dimension, the princes’ from an outer one. So Moshe is a shepherd and Eliyahu a prince; Moshe is known to come from the inner dimension, Eliyahu from the outer.
אמנם בזאת יתרון מעלת נס״א שנשמתם הם מבחי׳ עולם העליון יותר מנשמות הרועים אלא שהם מבחי׳ חיצוניות של העליון. והרועים הם מבחי׳ פנימית של התחתון.1
However, in this lies the superiority of the princes of men: their souls are from the level of a higher world than the souls of the shepherds, except that they are from the outer dimension of the higher, and the shepherds are from the inner dimension of the lower.
Yet the princes have an advantage: their souls come from a higher world. They are the outer dimension of a higher level, while the shepherds are the inner dimension of a lower one.
והוא כמו עד״מ שהעלים של מיני פירות החשובים ויקרים מאד יש בהם יתרון מעלה משאר פירות.
And it is, for example, like the leaves of very prized and precious kinds of fruit, which have a superiority over other fruits.
An analogy: the leaves of a very precious fruit tree have an advantage over other fruits.
אע״פ שהעלים הם חיצוניות. ואין בהם טעם אפי׳ כבמיני פירות הפשוטים מ״מ הם ממין וסוג אחר החשוב הרבה יותר ממין פירות הגרועים.
Although the leaves are external and have no taste, not even as much as the simple kinds of fruit, nevertheless they are of another kind and category, far more prized than the kind of inferior fruits.
The leaves are external and tasteless, less than even simple fruit, yet they belong to a far more precious species.
ונגד זה יש מעלה בפירות על העלין במה שמ״מ הם מין פרי ויש בהם טעם משא״כ בעלין כו׳.
And against this, the fruits have a superiority over the leaves, in that they are nevertheless a kind of fruit and have taste, which is not so with the leaves, etc.
Fruit, on the other hand, has the advantage of being edible and tasty, which leaves lack.
The paragraph resolves how princes can surpass shepherds: they are the outer dimension of a higher world, like leaves of a precious tree compared with ordinary fruit.
Derech Mitzvosecha on the Chanukah lamp (chapter 3) and the maamar “Lemaan Daas” of 5669 develop the outer dimension of the higher versus the inner dimension of the lower. The principle that the outer of the higher exceeds the inner of the lower recurs throughout Chassidus.
Marei mekomos
- 1מבחי׳ פנימית של התחתון · ראה בדרך מצותיך מצות נר חנוכה פ״ג. ד״ה למען דעת תרס״ט.
50והנה עד״ז יש ב׳ מיני נשמות שיש נשמות יראים ושלימים כמו עולה תמימה. ואעפ״כ אינם יכולים ללמד לזולתם תורת ה׳. ויש נשמות בעלי תורה ואינן שלימים בתכלית כ״כ בלי שום דופי כמו נשמות הנ״ל.
Now in this way there are two kinds of souls. There are souls of the G‑d-fearing and the whole, like “a perfect burnt-offering,” and nevertheless they cannot teach others the Torah of G‑d; and there are souls of masters of Torah, who are not so utterly whole, without any blemish, as the souls mentioned above.
The same two types exist among souls generally. Some are G‑d-fearing and wholly perfect, like a flawless offering, yet cannot teach Torah to others; others are masters of Torah who teach but are not entirely free of blemish.
The paragraph applies the distinction between shepherds and princes to souls in every generation: the perfectly pious and the Torah teachers.
51והיינו שהיראים ותמימים נלקח נשמתם מעלמא דאתכסיא וע״כ אינם פרנסי הדור לפי שהם מעלמא דאתכסיא בבחי׳ הסתר והעלם והוא המשומר ממגע וכו׳ ומ״מ אינם בעלי תורה כ״כ להיותם רק בחי׳ חיצוניות עליון.
That is, the souls of the G‑d-fearing and the perfect are taken from the hidden world, and therefore they are not the providers of the generation, since they are from the hidden world, in a state of hiddenness and concealment; and it is “that which is guarded from contact,” etc. And nevertheless they are not such masters of Torah, since they are only the level of the outer dimension of the higher.
The perfectly pious come from the “hidden world” (alma de’iskasya), a higher level marked by concealment. So they are not the providers of their generation; they are “guarded” from contact with the lower world. Nor are they great teachers, since they come from the outer dimension of the higher level.
The paragraph explains the pious: from the hidden, higher world, they are perfect but concealed, the outer dimension of a higher level.
In Kabbalah, the “hidden world” (alma de’iskasya) and the “revealed world” (alma de’isgalya) are higher and lower levels within Atzilus, often identified with Binah and Malchus.
52ובעלי תורה הם מבחי׳ פנימית רק שהם מבחי׳ פנימית תחתון עלמא דאתגליא לכן הם בהתגלות ללמד כו׳.
And the masters of Torah are from the level of the inner dimension, except that they are from the level of the inner dimension of the lower, the revealed world; therefore they are in a revealed state, to teach, etc.
The masters of Torah come from the inner dimension, but of the lower, “revealed world.” That is why their gifts are open and they teach.
ועד״ז הוא ענין שמונה נסיכי אדם ששרשם משמונה תקונים הראשונים שבי״ג ת״ד דא״א שהם בחי׳ מקיפים.
And in this way is the matter of the eight princes of men, whose root is from the first eight of the thirteen tikkunim of the beard of Arich Anpin, which are the level of encompassing [lights].
The eight princes are rooted in the first eight of the “thirteen tikkunim of the beard” of Arich Anpin, Kabbalistic channels of divine mercy that correspond to the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy. These eight are encompassing lights.
כי תקון לאלפים הוא בחי׳ או״פ1 כי לאלפים היינו אאלפך חכמה אאלפך בינה23 שאו״א יונקים מב׳ מזלות דא״א ויניקה זו היא בחי׳ או״פ
For the tikkun “to the thousands” (la’alafim) is the level of inner light, for “la’alafim” is [as in] “I will teach you (a’alefcha) Chochmah, I will teach you Binah”; for Abba and Imma draw nurture from two mazalos of Arich Anpin, and this nurture is the level of inner light,
The tikkun called la’alafim (“for thousands”) is inner light. The word is read through the verse “I will teach you (a’alefcha) wisdom”: Abba and Imma, Chochmah and Binah, draw from two of these channels, and that is inner light.
והוא כמו בחי׳ רועים ישראל מפרנסים כו׳ אכלו ריעים או״א כו׳ וזהו נוצר חסד לאלפים.4
and it is like the level of the shepherds, “Israel sustain, etc.,” “Eat, friends,” Abba and Imma, etc. And this is [the meaning of] “He preserves kindness for thousands (la’alafim).”
This is the shepherds’ level: Israel nourishing above, “Eat, friends,” as explained, here applied to Abba and Imma. That is the meaning of “He preserves kindness for thousands.”
The paragraph roots the masters of Torah in the inner dimension of the lower and the princes in the first eight of the thirteen tikkunim of Arich Anpin, which precede the inner light of Chochmah and Binah.
A maamar of 5669 cited by the note explains that Chochmah is drawn as “teaching” (ulpana), which requires contraction. Sefer HaErchim Chabad suggests that la’alafim has two senses, the level of Chochmah and Binah and the mode of drawing-down through contraction, and that they are linked: contraction is needed only where light is drawn inward.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי תקון לאלפים הוא בחי׳ או״פ · בד״ה למען ידעו תרס״ט ע׳ מה מציין לכאן: ”והיינו שההמשכה בחכמה הוא בבחי׳ אולפנא ולימוד שזהו ע״י צמצום”.
- 2כי לאלפים היינו אאלפך חכמה אאלפך בינה · ראה בארוכה בספר הערכים-חב״ד מערכת אות אלף במילואים טור תרנה להערה 125 שלכאורה הכוונה שבאלפים — שני פירושים א) שקאי על בחינת חו״ב שנק׳ בשם ”אלפים” ב) שקאי על סדר ואופן דהמשכה (ע״י צמצום וכו׳). והקשר דשני הפירושים הוא: אופן זה דהמשכה (ע״י צמצום וכו׳) המרומז בתמונת אל״ף — הוא דוקא כשההמשכה היא לבחי׳ פנימי (משא״כ לבחי׳ מקיף), ומכיון שתיקון ”לאלפים” (חו״ב) הוא התחלת בחי׳ פנימי (כמ״ש כאן בתו״א שהמזלות שקודם ”לאלפים” הם בחי׳ מקיפים) — לכן, בכדי שיומשך לבחינה זו (פירוש הא׳ ב”אלפים”), צ״ל אופן ההמשכה ע״י צמצום וכו׳ (פירוש הב׳ ב”אלפים”) ע״ש בארוכה.
- 3אאלפך חכמה אאלפך בינה · Job 33:33
- 4נוצר חסד לאלפים · Exodus 34:7
And therefore the form of the Alef is a Yud above, a Yud below and a Vav in the middle, for the drawing-down inwardly must come through contraction (tzimtzum), etc.
The letter Alef is drawn as a Yud above, a Yud below and a slanted Vav between them. It shows that light drawn inward must pass through contraction: the small upper Yud, then the extending Vav.
אבל ח׳ מזלות הראשונים שקודם בחי׳ לאלפים הם בחי׳ מקיפים ומשם שרש ח׳ נס״א והרי הם למעלה ממקור בחי׳ הרועים ששרשם מבחי׳ חו״ב
But the first eight mazalos, which precede the level of “to the thousands,” are the level of encompassing [lights], and from there is the root of the eight princes of men; and so they are higher than the source of the level of the shepherds, whose root is from the level of Chochmah and Binah,
The first eight channels, before la’alafim, are encompassing lights, the root of the eight princes. So the princes’ root is higher than the shepherds’, which lies in Chochmah and Binah.
שהם בחי׳ לאלפים הנ״ל. אך מ״מ הרועים הם מבחי׳ פנימית והנס״א מבחי׳ חיצוניות רק שהם חיצוניות עליון כו׳.
which are the level of “to the thousands” mentioned above. But nevertheless the shepherds are from the level of the inner dimension and the princes of men from the level of the outer dimension, except that they are the outer dimension of the higher, etc.
Still, the shepherds are from the inner dimension and the princes from the outer, though it is the outer dimension of a higher level.
The paragraph uses the shape of the Alef to show that inward light requires contraction, and places the princes’ root above the shepherds’ though in an outer dimension.
Torah Ohr, Yisro, cited by the note, gives the same reading of the Alef: the Vav, the drawing-down, comes only through the Yud above, the contraction.
Marei mekomos
- 1האל״ף תמונתו יו״ד למעלה ויו״ד למטה וי״ו באמצע · מבואר גם לקמן סט, ג ובד״ה כל המאריך באחד תרע״ח ע׳ שפז ואילך.
- 2ההמשכה בפנימית צ״ל ע״י צמצום · ראה ד״ה למען דעת תרס״ט ע׳ מה.
54ובחנוכה שטמאו כל השמנים שבהיכל שהוא בחי׳ הפגם המגיע בחו״ב ע״כ הוצרכו לתקן ע״י מקיפים דוקא שלמעלה משרש החכמה.
And on Chanukah, when they defiled all the oils in the Sanctuary, which is the level of the blemish that reaches Chochmah and Binah, they therefore needed to rectify it specifically through encompassing [lights], which are above the root of Chochmah.
On Chanukah the Greeks defiled the oils, a blemish that reached Chochmah and Binah, the level of wisdom itself. So the repair had to come from encompassing lights above the root of Chochmah.
ובסכות ממשיכים ג״כ י״ג ת״ד וזהו ענין י״ג פרים כו׳. רק שבסכות נכנעים עי״ז ממילא הע׳ שרים כו׳ משא״כ בחנוכה כו׳ וכנ״ל.
And on Sukkos the thirteen tikkunim of the beard are also drawn down, and this is the matter of the thirteen bullocks, etc. Only, on Sukkos the seventy princes become subdued of themselves through this, etc., which is not so on Chanukah, etc., as explained above.
On Sukkos the thirteen tikkunim are also drawn down, hence thirteen bullocks. But on Sukkos the seventy princes submit by themselves, while Chanukah requires a fight.
The paragraph applies the Kabbalistic structure to Chanukah and Sukkos: both draw the encompassing tikkunim, but Chanukah repairs a blemish in wisdom through battle.
55וע״ז נחלקו ב״ש וב״ה בענין הדלקת נ״ח וכמש״ל. עוד יש פי׳ בענין ז׳ רוים וח׳ נס״א כי בז״ת הי׳ שבירה ובינה רקיעא תמינאה נק׳ עלמא דחירו יין המשומר.1
And on this Beis Shammai and Beis Hillel disagree regarding the lighting of the Chanukah lamp, as explained above. There is a further explanation of the seven shepherds and eight princes of men: for in the seven lower [Sefiros] there was the shattering, and Binah, the eighth firmament, is called the world of freedom, the “wine preserved [in its grapes].”
This is the basis of the dispute between Beis Shammai and Beis Hillel. A second explanation: the shattering of the vessels took place in the seven lower Sefiros, while Binah, “the eighth firmament,” is the world of freedom, the “wine preserved in its grapes,” untouched by the shattering.
והנה ז׳ רועים נמשכים מז״ת ושמונה נס״א מבחי׳ רקיעא תמינאה לכן הם מועילים יותר לדחות בחי׳ אשור. ועמ״ש ע״פ למנצח על השמינית23 כו׳:
Now the seven shepherds are drawn from the seven lower [Sefiros], and the eight princes of men from the level of the eighth firmament; therefore they are more effective in repelling the level of Assyria. And see what is written on “For the conductor, on the sheminis, etc.”
The seven shepherds come from the seven lower Sefiros, the eight princes from the eighth level, Binah, which was never broken. So the princes are more effective against Assyria. The text refers to a maamar on “on the sheminis,” the eight-stringed harp.
The paragraph ties the dispute to the whole analysis and adds a second explanation: the eight princes come from Binah, above the shattering, and so are more powerful against evil.
Likkutei Torah, Tazria explains “on the sheminis” (the eighth) as a level above the seven, linked to the Supernal Keser. A sicha cited by the note links the eight Chanukah lights to the eight-stringed harp of the days of Mashiach.
Marei mekomos
- 1יין המשומר · Berakhot 34b
- 2ע״פ למנצח על השמינית · ראה לקו״ת תזריע כב, א. ובלקו״ש ח״כ ע׳ 346 הערה 186 הקישור בין ח׳ נרות דחנוכה עם כנור של ח׳ נימין.
- 3למנצח על השמינית · Psalms 6:1
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
In one’s avodah
First accept the yoke of Heaven and work to transform the animal soul with a love beyond one’s measure; that is the wick on which the light of the mitzvos can take hold. Then perform the mitzvos with joy. And in a time of darkness, like Chanukah, build the light from below one step at a time, always ascending in holiness.
Questions for discussion
- Why does a spiritual soul need a garment to receive G‑dliness, if an angel needs one only to descend into a physical world?
- In what way is the silvered mirror, which shows only an image, higher than clear glass?
- Why must the flame catch the wick before the oil, and what does that teach about accepting the yoke of Heaven before the mitzvos?
- How can the princes of men, who do not teach, have a higher root than the shepherds who do?
- Why does a light drawn from below, like the Chanukah lights, have to grow step by step, while Sukkos begins at its height?
Key terms in this maamar
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence.
- The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
- G‑d's presence as it dwells in the world. ×5
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence. ×1
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of the angels and emotions. ×1
- Delightתענוג
- Pleasure; the inner root of will. ×6
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×8
- Willרצון
- Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect. ×3
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×4
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one.
- The light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin)סובב כל עלמין
- Divine light too great to enter the worlds; it 'surrounds' them and affects them from beyond.
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×2
- The animal soulנפש הבהמית
- The soul that animates the body and its drives.
- The sitra achra (the other side)סטרא אחרא
- The realm opposed to holiness.
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- Teshuvah (return)תשובה
- Returning to G‑d; not only repentance. ×1
- The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
- The soul that is 'a part of G‑d above'. ×1
- Self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh)מסירות נפש
- Giving oneself over entirely to G‑d.
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d.
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving. ×6
- Daas (knowledge)דעת
- Deep connection to an idea, bridging intellect and emotion. ×3
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×7
- An arousal from belowאתערותא דלתתא
- Human initiative that draws down a divine response. ×1
- Love and aweאהבה ויראה
- The two 'wings' of divine service.
- The light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin)ממלא כל עלמין
- Divine light that enters each world and gives it life according to its measure.
- Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
- The forces of concealment that oppose holiness. ×1
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d.
- An arousal from aboveאתערותא דלעילא
- Divine initiative, unprompted by us. ×1
- Accepting the yoke (kabbalas ol)קבלת עול
- Submission to G‑d's will beyond understanding.
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The innermost core of a level. ×9
- The outer dimension (chitzoniyus)חיצוניות
- The external, expressive aspect. ×7
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×2
- Abba and Imma (Chochmah and Binah)אבא ואמא
- The intellectual configurations.
- Tzimtzum (contraction)צמצום
- The self-concealment of the Infinite Light that makes room for finite worlds. ×1
- The Sefirosספירות
- The ten divine attributes through which G‑d relates to creation.
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×7
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- G‑d as concealed within nature, measuring and limiting. ×2