Torah Ohr · Parshas Noach · Maamar 4
ויאמר ה׳ הן עם אחד ושפה א׳ לכלם…
“And G‑d said: Behold, they are one people, and one language for them all”
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
Unity and inclusion draw down a light higher than anything a single, separate level can receive, and this is why the builders of the Tower of Babel could really have succeeded. But true unity in holiness comes only through bittul; unity without self-nullification would feed evil, so peace among those who are nullified to G‑d is the only vessel that holds blessing.
The maamar in brief
The maamar asks how G‑d could say of the Tower’s builders that “nothing will be withheld from them,” as though they could act against His will, and what the tower was for. Following Rabbi Chaim Vital, they meant to force a flow of blessing through the holy Names without being good. To explain this, the Alter Rebbe asks why, among the Names that match the Sefiros, Havayah marks even the vessel of Tiferes. Reading Patach Eliyahu (“You are wise, but not with a known wisdom”), he distinguishes the defined Sefiros of Atzilus from their root, “the hidden ten Sefiros,” which the Arizal calls Akudim: all ten in one vessel, like the soul’s powers before they divide into the body’s organs. In Nekudim each Sefirah stood alone, and the vessels shattered (Tohu). In Tikkun they include one another through the Name Mah, which is bittul, and so the Infinite Light rests in them. Tiferes, Yaakov’s attribute, is the joining middle line, so Havayah shines even in its vessel. The builders sought that higher light through unity alone, without bittul; G‑d scattered them because the wicked are better apart, while the righteous united bring blessing — peace is the vessel of blessing.
Outline
- The question of the TowerHow could nothing be withheld from the builders against G‑d’s will, and what was the tower for? Rabbi Chaim Vital: they wanted to compel blessing through the holy Names without being worthy.¶1
- Havayah in the vessel of TiferesThe Names Kel, Elokim and Havayah match the vessels of Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes; why is even the vessel of Tiferes Havayah? Patach Eliyahu is introduced.¶2
- “You are wise, but not with a known wisdom”The wisdom of the Essence is beyond any defined Sefirah. The Chochmah of Atzilus is “known” because the lower worlds’ wisdom descends from it by cause and effect, while it comes from the higher level as something from nothing.¶3–5
- The hidden Sefiros and Akudim, with the analogy of the soulThe hidden ten Sefiros are the Arizal’s Akudim, all in one vessel, far above Atzilus. Like the soul’s powers, which are one within the soul and divided only in the body’s organs.¶6–9
- The descent to NekudimIn Nekudim each Sefirah stands alone, a single letter torn from a word. Even Akudim is far below the Infinite Light; the kav and the reshimu show the same pattern, with a question left open.¶10
- Tohu and Tikkun; the Name MahTohu shattered because its Sefiros were separate; in Tikkun they form partzufim that include one another, and the Infinite Light rests where there is joining. The inclusion comes through the Name Mah, bittul.¶11
- Tiferes, Torah and peaceTiferes, Yaakov’s middle line, joins Chesed and Gevurah, so Havayah shines even in its vessel. The Torah of Havayah is peace, and peace comes through bittul, the foundation of Torah, service and kindness.¶12
- The builders’ scheme and G‑d’s responseThey wanted the high flow of Havayah through unity alone, refusing bittul. Because unity truly draws from on high, their plan could have worked and fed evil; so G‑d confused their language. Scattering the wicked and gathering the righteous benefits the world, for peace is the vessel of blessing.¶13–17
Key concepts
- The hidden ten Sefirosעשר ספירות הגנוזות
- The roots of the Sefiros as they exist before any division, the “wisdom that is not a known wisdom” of Patach Eliyahu. The maamar identifies them with Akudim.
- Akudim, Nekudim, Berudimעקודים נקודים וברודים
- The Arizal’s three stages of the Sefiros: all bound in one vessel; separate points (Tohu, where the vessels shattered); and interconnected configurations (Tikkun).
- A known wisdomחכמה ידיעא
- The defined Chochmah of Atzilus, with its own vessel. It is called “known” because the knowable wisdom of the lower worlds descends from it step by step.
- Inclusionהתכללות
- Each Sefirah containing all the others. Where there is inclusion and joining, a higher light from the Infinite One rests.
- The Name Mahשם מ״ה
- Havayah spelled out to the value 45 (mah, “what”). It stands for bittul, and it brings about the inclusion of the World of Tikkun.
- Something from nothing versus cause and effectיש מאין / עילה ועלול
- A result with no likeness to its source, as Atzilus comes from what is above it, versus a lower version of its cause, as the lower worlds come from Atzilus (hishtalshelus).
- The kav and the reshimuהקו והרשימו
- After the tzimtzum, the line of light drawn into the vacated space and the trace of light that remained. The kav shines in each world by its measure; the reshimu includes all worlds.
For children · ages 9–13
Unity that is for G‑d
The big idea
When people join together and set themselves aside for G‑d, their unity brings down great blessing, because peace is the vessel that holds blessing.
After the Flood, people built the Tower of Babel, and G‑d said, “Behold, they are one people, and one language for them all; and now nothing will be withheld from them.” How could anyone succeed against G‑d’s will? The Alter Rebbe explains that unity is very powerful. When things are joined together, a higher light rests on them than on any one of them alone. In a world called Tohu, every quality stood alone, and its vessels broke. In the world of Tikkun the qualities join together, and G‑d’s light rests on them. What lets them join is bittul: setting aside one’s own “I” before G‑d. Tiferes, the quality of Yaakov, joins kindness and strictness, and so G‑d’s light shines in it. The builders wanted the great blessing of unity without bittul, without giving themselves over to G‑d. Because unity is so strong, their plan could really have worked and brought blessing to the wrong place, so G‑d mixed up their languages. Unity is holy when it comes with bittul. Torah, prayer and acts of kindness are all ways of bittul, and peace among people who serve G‑d is the vessel that holds blessing.
The mashal
In the body, seeing and hearing are separate powers, one in the eyes and one in the ears. But inside the soul they are all one, because the soul itself is one. So too, the qualities that are separate below are one in their hidden root.
Questions for the Shabbos table
- Why does joining together bring down more light than standing alone?
- What did the builders of the Tower of Babel want, and what was missing?
- How could you help bring peace among your family or friends this week by setting your own “I” aside a little?
Explanation © likuteitorah.com, CC BY-NC 4.0: retold for children from our translation and explanation, with AI assistance; not yet reviewed by a human editor.
In the Rebbe’s light · 6
AI research Found by AI reading every place in the Rebbe’s works that cites this maamar, and checked against each source by a second AI reader, the less certain by a third. Only what rated high is shown: the Rebbe’s own words, about this very passage. No person has reviewed it yet, so check the place itself before relying on a detail. See something to correct?
The maamar in the Rebbe’s light
This maamar explains why the builders of the tower could expect that „ועתה לא יבצר מהם” (“nothing will be withheld from them”): where the Sefiros are included in one another, as in Akudim, a light shines from beyond the worlds, and unity below draws it down. In a sicha of Shabbos Nitzavim 5730 the Rebbe notes that it reads „אנת הוא חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא” (“You are wise, but not with a known wisdom”) as the hidden Sefiros above Atzilus, unlike Patach Eliyahu, and uses it to explain how teshuvah cleanses. In a letter of 5704 he sets its image of the soul’s powers, one within the soul, beside Chanukah’s hidden cruse (הפך שמן), and on Shabbos Terumah 5746 he quotes its words on the reshimu as a lesson for bittul. In a sicha of 8 Shevat 5746 he argues from „חבור עצבים אפרים” (“Ephraim is joined to idols”) that the First Temple too fell through a lack of unity; in Ish al Diglo 5717, following the Tzemach Tzedek, he says the Exodus generation, the Dispersion’s souls returned, longed for the banners to repair that unity in holiness; and in a letter of 5717 he applies „וכנוס לצדיקים” (“gathering is good for the righteous”) to a gathering in holiness. Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) he reads the maamar’s warning and its promise together: the unity the builders misused is what draws blessing when it comes with bittul.
Paragraph by paragraph
- ¶4
A question the Rebbe raises
In a sicha of Shabbos Nitzavim 5730 on the fourth chapter of Iggeres HaTeshuvah, explaining his father’s precisions on how the Alter Rebbe there ties the Sefiros to the letters of the Name, the Rebbe asks in a note why the Alter Rebbe quotes “Eliyahu’s discourse” there, down to „אנת חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא” (“You are wise, but not with a known wisdom”).
Here the Alter Rebbe calls the Chochmah of Atzilus “a known wisdom” (חכמה ידיעא), and “You are wise” means the hidden ten Sefiros (ע״ס הגנוזות) above Atzilus. The Rebbe notes that in Torah Ohr’s maamar „פתח אליהו” (“Patach Eliyahu”) the same words mean something else: the Chochmah of Atzilus itself is “not known” relative to the Chochmah of the lower worlds. In Iggeres HaTeshuvah, he says, the words follow this maamar’s reading: even above the ten Sefiros of Atzilus there are hidden ten Sefiros, intermediaries through which “Anta” is drawn into the ten Sefiros, „ועי״ז מנקים הפגמים” (and through which the blemishes are cleansed).
The Alter Rebbe
ר״ל כי חכמה דאצי׳ נק׳ חכמה ידיעא
The Rebbe
וקאי להפירוש (תו״א י, ג. וכ״ה בכ״מ) דאנת הוא חכים כו׳ הוא באותה הדרגא ד״אנת הוא דאפיקת כו׳”, וקאי על ע״ס הגנוזות שלמעלה מאצילות
Likkutei Sichos, vol. יט, p. 418–419 (note 12, with its starred note on p. 419; the sicha begins on p. 416) · משיחת ש״פ נצבים תש״ל
- ¶7
Background from the Rebbe
In a letter of 16 Teves 5704, answering why the Chanukah lights alone have a degree of “mehadrin min hamehadrin” and why their miracle came then, the Rebbe adds what he found on it in Chassidus, and there sets Akudim beside the hidden cruse of oil (הפך שמן).
This paragraph explains Akudim by the soul’s powers, which before they spread into the limbs „כשהיו עדיין כלולים בהנפש ודאי היו כולם בהתכללות אחת ממש” (are all one inside the soul). The Rebbe cites this explanation (“Torah Ohr at the end of Noach, and more fully Torah Chaim there”) and sets it beside the Mitteler Rebbe’s reading of the Chanukah cruse of oil: „העלם עצמות התענוג טרם שבא לגילוי בחכמה” (the hidden essence of delight before it comes into Chochmah), where all the stirrings of will and delight are included as one. He ends, „ועדיין צ״ע בזה” (“this still needs study”).
The Alter Rebbe
כשהיו עדיין כלולים בהנפש ודאי היו כולם בהתכללות אחת ממש בלי שום התחלקות
The Rebbe
בביאור ענין עקודים (תו״א ס״פ נח ובביאור יותר בתו״ח שם. ועוד) שהוא עד״מ בכחות הנפש כמו שהם כלולים עדיין בהנפש בלי שום התחלקות
Igros Kodesh, vol. א, p. רכו (letter 125, pp. רכא–רכו; in the letter’s body: the paragraph after its lettered excerpts א–ב that compares them, begun on p. רכה, "ולכאורה ב׳ פירושים הנ״ל אחד הם") · יום ד׳ ט״ז טבת, תש״ד
- ¶10
The Rebbe explains
At the farbrengen of Shabbos Parshas Terumah, eve of 7 Adar I 5746, explaining his father’s notes on the Zohar about the tzimtzum and what they teach for a person’s avodah, the Rebbe quotes this paragraph’s words on the reshimu (רשימו).
This paragraph says „הארת הקו מאיר בכל עולם לפי ערכו” (the kav shines in each world by its measure), while the reshimu is „בחי׳ הכוללת לכל העולמות” (“the level that includes all the worlds”). The Rebbe quotes these words and adds: the reshimu is an impression of the whole Infinite Light before the tzimtzum, from a level the tzimtzum did not touch, all of it held there in concealment. In avodah, he says, a person’s bittul must be complete, like the first tzimtzum, yet within it a “reshimu” remains that includes all that is above his own light and revelation; that is why bittul never makes him „אסקופה הנדרסת” (“a trodden threshold”), and it gives him the strength to serve with breadth, „ואתהלכה ברחבה” (“I will walk in broad places”).
The Alter Rebbe
אך הרשימו היא בחי׳ הכוללת לכל העולמות
The Rebbe
דארף אין דעם גופא בלייבן א ”רשימו” וואס איז כולל אלע ענינים שלמעלה מבחי׳ אור וגילויים שלו
Sichos Kodesh 5746, vol. ב (19, כסלו–אדר), p. 695–696 (section כג) · ש״פ תרומה, ערב ז׳ אדר ראשון, ה׳תשמ״ו (הנחת התמימים, בלתי מוגה)
- ¶15
Background from the Rebbe
In a sicha of Shabbos Parshas Bo, 8 Shevat 5746, the Shabbos before Yud Shevat, asking that the gatherings on the Rebbe Rayatz’s yahrzeit be filled with „אהבת ואחדות ישראל” (the love and unity of Israel) he asked for, the Rebbe notes that this is hinted in the Rebbe Rayatz’s maamar Basi LeGani (באתי לגני), which sets all of avodah as „ושכנתי בתוכם” (“I will dwell among them”) (the vessel for the Shechinah, he adds, is unity), and in a further note that the First Temple too fell through a lack of unity.
This paragraph brings „חבור עצבים אפרים” (“Ephraim is joined to idols, let him be”): unity itself draws a flow from above, even without bittul. In a note the Rebbe argues that, although Yoma says only the Second Temple fell through baseless hatred (שנאת חנם), the destruction of the First Temple too must have come from a lack of unity, pointing to this passage and to Or HaTorah there on “joined to idols”: „שהיו יוצאין למלחמה ונוצחין, שהאחדות הייתה שוללת נצחון האויב” (they went out to war and won, for their unity ruled out the enemy’s victory).
The Alter Rebbe
שע״י האחדות שיהיה ביניהם להיות חבור עצבים ע״כ עי״ז ימשיכו להם טובה והשפעה גשמית
The Rebbe
בענין ”חבור עצבים אפרים” שהיו יוצאין למלחמה ונוצחין, שהאחדות הייתה שוללת נצחון האויב
Likkutei Sichos, vol. כו, p. 329 (the starred note at the foot of the page; the sicha begins on p. 328) · משיחת ש״פ בא, ח׳ שבט ה׳תשמ״ו, the Shabbos before Yud Shevat (running head p. 329; the unedited original: Sichos Kodesh 5746 vol. 2 pp. 479–483)
- ¶17
Background from the Rebbe
In a letter of Erev Shabbos Parshas Shoftim 5717 to the first annual gathering of the alumni of the Tomchei Temimim yeshivos in America, the Rebbe explains the power of a gathering of those who keep the mitzvos.
This paragraph ends: „וכנוס לצדיקים שיש בהם הבטול להש״י הנאה להם והנאה לעולם” (a gathering of the righteous, who have bittul, is good for them and for the world), because joining draws from a supernal place. The Rebbe quotes it “in the words of our Rebbe, the Alter Rebbe”: „ע״י ההתכללות והחיבור נמשך ממקום עליון ביותר, ממקום הכולל לכל ההשתלשלות בשוה” (through inclusion and joining, a flow comes from the highest place, the place that includes all the chain of worlds equally). So, he writes, of such a gathering it can be said, as of the builders but in holiness, that „לא יבצר מהם” (nothing will be withheld from them).
The Alter Rebbe
וכנוס לצדיקים שיש בהם הבטול להש״י הנאה להם והנאה לעולם כי ע״י ההתכללות נמשך ממקום עליון
The Rebbe
ובלשון רבנו הזקן: ע״י ההתכללות והחיבור נמשך ממקום עליון ביותר, ממקום הכולל לכל ההשתלשלות בשוה. ולכן לא יבצר מהם ולא יפלא מהם — מכינוס שכזה
Likkutei Sichos, vol. כד, p. 483–484 (the quote on p. 484) · עש״ק אחר חצות, פ׳ כי יפלא ממך דבר (שופטים), ה׳תשי״ז
- ¶17
Background from the Rebbe
In the maamar “Ish al diglo b’osos l’veis avosam” of Shabbos Bamidbar, Mevarchim Sivan 5717, asking why Israel at Sinai longed for the banners (הדגלים) they saw among the angels when souls stand higher than angels, the Rebbe, following the Biurei HaZohar of the Mitteler Rebbe and the Tzemach Tzedek, connects that longing with the generation of the Dispersion.
Our paragraph says the builders’ unity would have drawn from the highest place, which is why „ועתה לא יבצר מהם” (“nothing will be withheld from them”), but without bittul it would have fed the other side, so G‑d scattered them. In Ish al Diglo 5717 the Rebbe restates this „כמבואר בארוכה בחסידות” (“as explained at length in Chassidus”), in the paragraph’s own words, and gives its sequel, following the Tzemach Tzedek: „שהנשמות של הדור שיצאו ממצרים היו גלגול דור ההפלגה” (the souls of the generation that left Egypt were the generation of the Dispersion returned), and they longed for the banners, „האחדות בקדושה” (“unity in holiness”), to repair that generation’s sin.
The Alter Rebbe
ע״כ עשו עיר ומגדל גבוה כדי שיתקבצו כולם שם ולא יפרדו איש מעל אחיו וכמ״ש הראב״ע
The Rebbe
כמבואר בארוכה בחסידות שרצו להמשיך מקום נעלה ביותר, עי״ז שיהיו באחדות, שלכן עשו העיר ומגדל כדי שיתקבצו כולם שם ולא יפרדו איש מעל אחיו
Sefer HaMaamarim 5717 (new edition, unedited), vol. תשי״ז, p. רכו (the maamar begins on p. רכג) · ש״פ במדבר, מבה״ח סיון, ה׳תשי״ז (הנחה בלתי מוגה)
Short quotes only, with the place of each so it can be read in full. The Rebbe’s sichos, letters and maamarim are published by Kehot and by Vaad Hanochos B’Lahak (lahak.org).
The question of the Tower ¶1
“And G‑d said: Behold, [they are] one people, and one language for them all,” etc., “and now nothing will be withheld from them,” etc.
The maamar opens with G‑d’s words about the builders of the Tower of Babel: because they are one people with one language, nothing they plan will be beyond them. The whole discourse will explain why their unity gave them such power.
ולכאורה תמוה איך לא יבצר3 מהם נגד רצונו ית׳ ומי זה אמר ותהי אם4 ה׳ לא צוה. גם מה הי׳ [היה] מחשבותם לעשות מגדל וראשו בשמים5 שכל זה תמוה.
At first glance this is puzzling: how could nothing be withheld from them against His will, blessed be He? “Who is it that spoke and it came to be, if G‑d did not command it?” Also, what were their thoughts in making a tower “with its top in the heavens”? For all this is puzzling.
Two questions. First, nothing can happen against G‑d’s will — as the verse in Lamentations says, nothing comes to be unless He commands it — so how could G‑d say that their scheme, which He opposed, would succeed? Second, what were they really trying to achieve with a tower whose top reaches heaven?
¶17 Hold this question: paragraphs 13–17 answer it.
אך הנה בלק״ת [בלקוטי תורה (להאריז״ל)] להרח״ו [להרבי חיים ויטאל] ז״ל [זכרונו לברכה / זכרונם לברכה]6 כתב בענין דור הפלגה שכוונתם הי׳ [היה] להמשיך להם השפעת טובה בהכרח בכח שמוש השמות7 אף אם לא היו טובים כו׳ ע״ש.
But in the Likkutei Torah of Rabbi Chaim Vital, of blessed memory, he writes concerning the generation of the Dispersion that their intention was to draw down to themselves a flow of good by compulsion, through the power of using the [holy] Names, even though they were not good, etc.; see there.
The Alter Rebbe points to the Likkutei Torah of Rabbi Chaim Vital, the Arizal’s chief disciple: not the Alter Rebbe’s book of that name, but an earlier Kabbalistic work, the Arizal’s teachings on the Torah as Rabbi Chaim Vital recorded them. There he explains that the builders wanted to force a flow of blessing down to themselves by using the holy Names, receiving good from Above even though they themselves were not good; the rest of the maamar explains how such a thing could work and why G‑d stopped it.
The paragraph presents the verse, raises the two questions it provokes — how anything could succeed against G‑d’s will, and what the tower was for — and points to Rabbi Chaim Vital’s answer: they meant to compel a flow of blessing through the power of the holy Names.
The Tzemach Tzedek (Or HaTorah) explains “using the Names” as the adjurations and holy Names known in early generations: by mentioning a Name one draws down the supernal power it represents. A later discourse with the same opening words (Sefer HaMaamarim 5643) takes up directly how a created being can act against G‑d’s will.
TermsSupernal WillRatzon
- Supernal Will רצון העליון
- Ratzon רצון
Marei mekomos
- 1ויאמר — הן עם אחד · Song of Songs 4:2
- 2ויאמר ה׳ הן עם אחד · Genesis 11:6
- 3ולכאורה תמוה איך לא יבצר · במאמרי אדה״ז פרשיות ע׳ סא ישנם עוד קושיות. וראה גם תו״ח כאן סג, ג ואילך.
- 4מי זה אמר ותהי אם ה׳ לא צוה · Lamentations 3:37
- 5מגדל וראשו בשמים · Genesis 11:4
- 6בלקו״ת להרח״ו ז״ל · באוה״ת בראשית כרך ג תרנז, א ”בלקו״ת מהאריז״ל ס״פ נח בשם מהרח״ו ז״ל” ושם מעתיק הלשון. וכ״ה שם תרסג, א. תרסד, א. אוה״ת בראשית כרך ו תתרסו, ב. שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ א׳יב. מובא גם בד״ה זה תרמ״ג ע׳ א. ושם מפרש איך שייך שנברא יעשה נגד רצונו ית׳.
- 7בכח שמוש השמות · Yevamot 116a
Havayah in the vessel of Tiferes ¶2
2וביאור הענין יובן במ״ש בכהאריז״ל [בכתבי האריז״ל] ובפרדס1 בענין ז׳ שמות שאינן נמחקין23 שם אל בחסד שם אלקים בגבורה ושם הוי״ה בתפארת.
The explanation of the matter will be understood from what is written in the writings of the Arizal and in the Pardes concerning the seven Names that may not be erased: the Name Kel in Chesed (kindness), the Name Elokim in Gevurah (restraint), and the Name Havayah in Tiferes (beauty).
The Talmud lists seven Names of G‑d that may not be erased. The Arizal and Rabbi Moshe Cordovero (in his Pardes Rimonim) match these Names with the Sefiros: the Name Kel (a short Name of G‑d) with Chesed, Elokim with Gevurah, and Havayah (the four-letter Name) with Tiferes.
ופי׳ דהיינו בהכלים דחג״ת [דחסד גבורה תפארת] כי האור הוא בכולם משם הוי״ה ורק בהכלים הוא בחסד שם אל כו׳.
The explanation is that this refers to the vessels of Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes; for the light in all of them is from the Name Havayah, and only in the vessels is it the Name Kel in Chesed, etc.
Every Sefirah has a light (the revelation within it) and a vessel (the form that contains it). The Alter Rebbe explains that the light in all of them is from Havayah; the different Names apply only to the vessels, which give each Sefirah its particular character.
ובתפארת אפי׳ [אפילו] בהכלי מאיר שם הוי״ה4 (ועמ״ש בפ׳ בא5 בפסוק בעצם היום הזה).6 ולהבין זה מפני מה בתפארת הוא הכלי ג״כ מבחי׳ שם הוי״ה7 משא״כ בשארי הספי׳ [הספירה / הספירות].
But in Tiferes, even in the vessel, the Name Havayah shines (and see what is written in Parshas Bo on the verse “On that very day”). [We need] to understand this: why in Tiferes is the vessel, too, from the level of the Name Havayah, which is not so in the other Sefiros?
Tiferes is the exception: even its vessel is Havayah, not only its light (the parenthesis sends the reader to the Alter Rebbe’s maamar in Torah Ohr, Parshas Bo, on “On that very day all the hosts of Havayah went out of the land of Egypt”). Why should Tiferes differ from the other Sefiros? The answer comes in paragraph 12, after a long explanation of how the Sefiros become included in one another.
¶12 Hold this question about Tiferes: paragraph 12 answers it.
To prepare the answer, the Alter Rebbe turns to “Eliyahu opened” (Patach Eliyahu), the famous passage in the introduction to the Tikkunei Zohar, a companion work to the Zohar, the foundational book of Kabbalah; it opens with words spoken by the prophet Eliyahu. It describes G‑d bringing forth ten “tikkunim,” the ten Sefiros, and matches them to the limbs of a body: Chesed the right arm, Chochmah the brain, Binah the heart.
The paragraph sets up the maamar’s first problem: of the Names of G‑d linked to the Sefiros, why does Havayah mark even the vessel of Tiferes? It then opens the passage of Patach Eliyahu that will supply the answer.
In Torah Ohr, Bo (the maamar on “On that very day”), the Alter Rebbe explains that the Names that may not be erased are the vessels of the Sefiros of Atzilus (Kel in the vessel of Chesed, Elokim in Gevurah, Ado-nai in Malchus), while Havayah is the light from the Infinite One clothed within all of them, which is why Havayah joins the other Names. The Tzemach Tzedek (Or HaTorah, Shemos) notes that Havayah is called “the unique Name” because it is of the level of simple light — and yet here it appears as the vessel of Tiferes.
TermsTiferesGevurahLights and vesselsYud-hei and vav-hei+5
- Tiferes תפארת explained hereHere, of the unerasable Names, Kel and Elokim mark the vessels of Chesed and Gevurah, though their light is Havayah; in Tiferes even the vessel is Havayah.
ולהבין זה מפני מה בתפארת הוא הכלי ג״כ מבחי׳ שם הוי״ה משא״כ בשארי הספי׳
- Gevurah גבורה
- Lights and vessels אורות וכלים
- Yud-hei and vav-hei י״ה ו״ה
- Binah בינה
- Elokim אלקים
- Chesed חסד
Marei mekomos
- 1בכתבי האריז״ל ובפרדס · ע״ח שמ״ה פ״ג. ראה לקו״ת ויקרא הוספות נא, ג.
- 2ז׳ שמות שאינן נמחקין · ראה בלקו״ש חכ״א ע׳ 195 הערה 60.
- 3ז׳ שמות שאינן נמחקין · Shevuot 35a:27
- 4ובתפארת אפי׳ בהכלי מאיר שם הוי״ה · ראה ד״ה ויאמר אלקים יהי רקיע — תרס״ה ע׳ מח.
- 5ועמ״ש בפ׳ בא · לקמן ס, א. ובמ״מ לשם.
- 6בעצם היום הזה · Exodus 12:41
- 7מפני מה בתפארת הוא הכלי ג״כ מבחי׳ שם הוי״ה · ראה לקמן י, ד. ראה באוה״ת פ׳ שמות כרך א ע׳ קו שכתב ”אין לתמוה . . נתבאר דשם הוי׳ נקרא שם המיוחד להיותו בבחי׳ האור שהוא פשוט כו׳ והרי כשהוא בבחי׳ כלי הת״ת” ע״ש בארוכה. בלקו״ת שה״ש כ, ד מציין לכאן.
- 8במאמר דפתח אליהו · ת״ז בהקדמה.
- 9פתח אליהו אנת הוא דאפיקת עשר תיקונין וקרינן להון עשר ספירן. חסד דרועא ימינא כו׳ חכמה מוחא בינה לבא · Tikkunei Zohar 17a:11–12
“You are wise, but not with a known wisdom” ¶3–5
3וכל ספירה אית לה שם ידיעא כו׳ ואנת י, גלית לך שם ידיעא אנת הוא חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא אנת הוא מבין ולא בבינה ידיעא.1
“And each Sefirah has a known name, etc., but You have no known name. You are wise, but not with a known wisdom; You understand, but not with a known understanding.”
Patach Eliyahu goes on: every Sefirah has a “known name” — a definite, defined identity — but G‑d Himself has none. He is wise, yet not with any wisdom we could define; He understands, yet not with any understanding we could define.
דהנה תחלה הזכיר חו״ב [חכמה ובינה] חכמה מוחא ובינה לבא ומהו שאמר אח״כ אנת הוא חכים דאין ר״ל [רוצה לומר] אנת הוא חכים שמתלבש באותו בחי׳ חכמה שהזכיר תחלה שהוא מהע״ס [מהעשר ספירות].
For first it mentioned Chochmah and Binah — “Chochmah, the brain, and Binah, the heart” — so what does it mean when it says afterwards, “You are wise”? For it does not mean “You are wise” in the sense that He is clothed in that very level of Chochmah it mentioned first, which is one of the ten Sefiros.
The difficulty: the passage has just called Chochmah “the brain” and Binah “the heart.” So “You are wise” cannot mean G‑d clothed in that Chochmah, one of the ten Sefiros — otherwise it would simply repeat what was said.
דמדקאמר וכל ספירה אית לה שם ידיעא ואנת לית לך שם ידיעא אנת הוא חכים. זה מורה דפי׳ אנת הוא חכים הוא ג״כ בבחי׳ דלית לך שם ידיעא.
For from its saying, “And each Sefirah has a known name, but You have no known name; You are wise,” this indicates that the meaning of “You are wise” is also in the sense of “You have no known name.”
The context proves it: “You are wise” comes right after “You have no known name.” So G‑d’s being “wise” must itself be beyond any defined name — a wisdom that is not one of the known Sefiros.
Reading Patach Eliyahu closely, the Alter Rebbe shows that “You are wise, but not with a known wisdom” refers to a level of wisdom in G‑d that is beyond the Sefirah of Chochmah and has no defined name.
Marei mekomos
- 1וכל ספירה אית לה שם ידיעא כו׳ ואנת לית לך שם ידיעא אנת הוא חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא אנת הוא מבין ולא בבינה ידיעא · Tikkunei Zohar 17a:5–8
4ואלו בהתלבשות אור א״ס ב״ה בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] דאצי׳ אזי נקרא הוא ית׳ בשם לפי הספי׳ [הספירה / הספירות] שמתלבש בה
Now, as the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, clothes itself in the ten Sefiros of Atzilus (Emanation), He, blessed be He, is then called by a name according to the Sefirah in which He is clothed,
When the Infinite Light clothes itself in the Sefiros of Atzilus, the highest world, G‑d is called by the Name that belongs to that Sefirah — as in the list of the seven Names above.
כמ״ש בפרדס שער השמות12 באריכות וכנ״ל שם אל בחסד כו׳. וא״כ איך יתכן בחי׳ אנת הוא חכים וגם לית לך שם ידיעא.3
as is written at length in the Pardes, in the Gate of the Names, and as [stated] above: the Name Kel in Chesed, etc. If so, how is it possible [to speak of] the level of “You are wise,” and also “You have no known name”?
This is set out in Pardes Rimonim, in its Gate of the Names. So the question is sharper: if speaking of G‑d as “wise” means He is in a Sefirah, He would then have a known name — how can the Tikkunei Zohar say both “You are wise” and “You have no known name”?
אלא הפי׳ דמתחלה אמר אנת הוא חד ולא בחושבן ואע״ג [ואף על גב] דאפיקת עשר תקונין4 שהם ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דתקון דאצי׳ אשר כל ספירה היא בחינה מיוחדת מזולתה חכמה חסד כו׳
Rather, the meaning is this: it first said, “You are One, but not in number”; and although “You brought forth ten tikkunim,” which are the ten Sefiros of the Tikkun of Atzilus, in which each Sefirah is a level distinct from the others — Chochmah, Chesed, etc. —
The answer begins from the start of the passage, “You are One, but not in number”: G‑d’s oneness is not the “one” of counting. Yet He brought forth ten distinct Sefiros, the ten of the World of Tikkun in Atzilus, each quite different from the others.
וא״כ הוה ס״ד שגם בהעצמות יש ח״ו [חס ושלום] ג״כ בחינות מיוחדות חכמה חסד כו׳ לזה אומר שאינו כן כי בחי׳ אנת הוא חכים הוא ולא בחכמה ידיעא.
then one might have thought that in the Essence, too, there are, G‑d forbid, likewise distinct levels, Chochmah, Chesed, etc. To this it says that it is not so; for the level of “You are wise” is “but not with a known wisdom.”
Someone might think that since the Sefiros are distinct, G‑d’s own Essence also has separate parts — a wisdom here, a kindness there. Eliyahu rules this out: in the Essence there is “wisdom,” but not a defined, known wisdom set apart from the rest.
ר״ל [רוצה לומר] כי חכמה דאצי׳ נק׳ חכמה ידיעא אע״פ [אף על פי] שהיא ג״כ באמת למעלה מעלה ממהות חכמה דבי״ע מ״מ כיון
The Chochmah of Atzilus is called “a known wisdom.” It is immeasurably higher than the wisdom of the three lower worlds, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah; yet the next part explains why even it is still called “known.”
שהיא מקור ושרש להן נקראת חכמה ידיעא והיינו ששם הוא בחי׳ כלים ממש חכמה יש לה כלי בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] בינה בפ״ע [בפני עצמו].
it is their source and root, it is called “a known wisdom.” That is, there it is the level of actual vessels: Chochmah has a vessel of its own, Binah [a vessel] of its own.
Because it is the source of their wisdom, and because in Atzilus there are real, separate vessels — Chochmah in its own vessel and Binah in its own — the Chochmah of Atzilus counts as a defined, “known” wisdom.
The paragraph resolves the contradiction: “You have no known name” speaks of G‑d’s Essence, where there are no separate attributes, while “known wisdom” is the Chochmah of Atzilus, a distinct Sefirah in its own vessel.
In the Mitteler Rebbe’s transcript of this maamar (Maamarei Admur HaZaken) the Alter Rebbe explains this through “the ten hidden Sefiros,” which the maamar introduces in paragraph 6.
The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research
A question the Rebbe raises
In a sicha of Shabbos Nitzavim 5730 on the fourth chapter of Iggeres HaTeshuvah, explaining his father’s precisions on how the Alter Rebbe there ties the Sefiros to the letters of the Name, the Rebbe asks in a note why the Alter Rebbe quotes “Eliyahu’s discourse” there, down to „אנת חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא” (“You are wise, but not with a known wisdom”).
Here the Alter Rebbe calls the Chochmah of Atzilus “a known wisdom” (חכמה ידיעא), and “You are wise” means the hidden ten Sefiros (ע״ס הגנוזות) above Atzilus. The Rebbe notes that in Torah Ohr’s maamar „פתח אליהו” (“Patach Eliyahu”) the same words mean something else: the Chochmah of Atzilus itself is “not known” relative to the Chochmah of the lower worlds. In Iggeres HaTeshuvah, he says, the words follow this maamar’s reading: even above the ten Sefiros of Atzilus there are hidden ten Sefiros, intermediaries through which “Anta” is drawn into the ten Sefiros, „ועי״ז מנקים הפגמים” (and through which the blemishes are cleansed).
The Alter Rebbe
ר״ל כי חכמה דאצי׳ נק׳ חכמה ידיעא
The Rebbe
וקאי להפירוש (תו״א י, ג. וכ״ה בכ״מ) דאנת הוא חכים כו׳ הוא באותה הדרגא ד״אנת הוא דאפיקת כו׳”, וקאי על ע״ס הגנוזות שלמעלה מאצילות
Likkutei Sichos, vol. יט, p. 418–419 (note 12, with its starred note on p. 419; the sicha begins on p. 416) · משיחת ש״פ נצבים תש״ל
Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made
TermsSefirosTohu and TikkunLights and vesselsAtzmus u’mahus+9
- Sefiros ספירות
- Tohu and Tikkun תהו ותקון
- Lights and vessels אורות וכלים
- Atzmus u’mahus עצמות ומהות
- Binah בינה
- Yetzirah יצירה
- Asiyah עשיה
- Chesed חסד
- Beriah בריאה
- Atzilus אצילות
Marei mekomos
- 1כמ״ש בפרדס שער השמות · ש״כ.
- 2כמ״ש בפרדס שער השמות · Pardes Rimmonim 20:1:1–4
- 3איך יתכן בחי׳ אנת הוא חכים וגם לית לך שם ידיעא · במאמרי אדה״ז פרשיות שם ע׳ סד מבאר זה בענין ע״ס הגנוזות. וראה בלקו״ש חי״ט ע׳ 419 בשולי הגליון. בלקו״ת שה״ש ד, ג מציין לכאן.
- 4אנת הוא חד ולא בחושבן ואע״ג דאפיקת עשר תקונין · Tikkunei Zohar 17a:9–11
5וזהו דייקא בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] דאצילו׳ [דאצילות]. אבל מה דאנת הוא חכים הוא לא בחכמה ידיעא כלל עד שהתהוות חכמה דאצי׳ מבחי׳ אנת הוא חכים הוא
And this is specifically in the ten Sefiros of Atzilus. But that of which [it says] “You are wise” is not with a known wisdom at all — so much so that the coming into being of the Chochmah of Atzilus from the level of “You are wise” is
The “known” Sefiros belong to Atzilus. The wisdom of “You are wise” is not a known wisdom at all, and the gap between them is total: the Chochmah of Atzilus comes from it the way something comes from nothing.
ע״ד התהוות יש מאין ולא בחי׳ עילה ועלול כלל ולא ע״ד התהוות חכמה דבי״ע מחכמה דאצי׳ שזה נק׳ ג״כ השתלשלות שלכך נק׳ חכמה דאצי׳ חכמה ידיעא ואיך היא ידיעא
in the manner of coming into being as something from nothing (yesh me’ayin), and not [in the manner of] cause and effect at all; and not like the coming into being of the Chochmah of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah from the Chochmah of Atzilus, which is also called the chain of descent (hishtalshelus). This is why the Chochmah of Atzilus is called “a known wisdom.” And how is it “known”?
Two kinds of coming into being are contrasted. Something from nothing (yesh me’ayin) means the result bears no likeness to its source; cause and effect means the effect is a lower version of its cause. The wisdom of the lower worlds comes from the Chochmah of Atzilus in the second way, and so it counts as part of the chain of descent (hishtalshelus).
אלא שלפי שחכמה דבי״ע נתהווה ממנה ע״י השתלשלו׳ [השתלשלות] והיא גלויה וידועה לכך גם החכמה דאצי׳ נק׳ חכמה ידיעא.1
Only because the Chochmah of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah came into being from it by way of hishtalshelus, and it is revealed and known — therefore the Chochmah of Atzilus, too, is called “a known wisdom.”
This explains the name “known”: the lower worlds’ wisdom, which comes step by step from the Chochmah of Atzilus, is revealed and knowable. Since what descends from it is known, its source, the Chochmah of Atzilus, is also called “known.”
The paragraph distinguishes the unbridgeable leap from “You are wise” to the Chochmah of Atzilus (something from nothing) from the continuous descent from Atzilus to the lower worlds (cause and effect), and explains why Atzilus’s Chochmah is called “known.”
In Likkutei Torah (Behar), to which the note points, the Alter Rebbe uses a parallel: the letters of a written teaching bear no comparison to the insight they carry; for one who cannot understand, the insight stays entirely hidden, and only a trace of it reaches him.
TermsYesh me’ayinIlah ve’alulSefirosYetzirah+5
- Yesh me’ayin יש מאין explained hereHere, Chochmah of Atzilus comes from “You are wise, not with a known wisdom” as yesh me’ayin, while Chochmah of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah comes from it by hishtalshelus.
עד שהתהוות חכמה דאצי׳ מבחי׳ אנת הוא חכים הוא ע״ד התהוות יש מאין ולא בחי׳ עילה ועלול כלל
- Ilah ve’alul עילה ועלול
- Sefiros ספירות
- Yetzirah יצירה
- Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
- Asiyah עשיה
- Beriah בריאה
- Atzilus אצילות
Also Chochmah
Marei mekomos
- 1לכך גם החכמה דאצי׳ נק׳ חכמה ידיעא · ע׳ בלקו״ת פ׳ בהר מג, ג [כ]. בלק״ת נשא כב, ד מציין לכאן.
The hidden Sefiros and Akudim, with the analogy of the soul ¶6–9
6וכמו ע״ד שנק׳ אדם דאצי׳ אדם דעשייה. משא״כ בחי׳ אנת הוא חכים הוא לא בחכמה ידיעא וזהו הנק׳ בלשון הפרדס עשר ספירות הגנוזות1 במאצילן שע״ז אמר אנת הוא חכים כו׳.
And it is like the way that Adam of Atzilus is called Adam of Asiyah. But the level of “You are wise” is not with a known wisdom; and this is what is called, in the language of the Pardes, “the ten Sefiros hidden in their Emanator,” of which it said, “You are wise,” etc.
“Adam” (Man) is the Kabbalistic name for the full ten-Sefirah structure of a world. Even the Adam of Atzilus, so lofty compared with what is below it, is like the lowest world, Asiyah, compared with what is above it. The wisdom of “You are wise” is what Pardes Rimonim calls “the ten Sefiros hidden in their Emanator,” the roots of the Sefiros as they are within G‑d Himself.
וענין זה עולה בקנה אחד עם מ״ש בע״ח [בעץ חיים] שיש עקודים נקודים וברודים והיינו שבעקודים כל הע״ס [העשר ספירות] הם עקודים בכלי א׳ ואין שם שום
This matter is fully of one piece with what is written in Etz Chaim: that there are Akudim, Nekudim and Berudim. That is, in Akudim all ten Sefiros are bound together in one vessel, and there is no
The Arizal’s Etz Chaim describes three early stages of the Sefiros: Akudim (“bound together”), Nekudim (“points”) and Berudim (the interconnected). The names are the words the Torah uses for Yaakov’s “streaked, speckled and spotted” flocks (paragraph 12). In Akudim all ten are held in a single vessel, with no division among them.
התחלקות כלל לע״ס [לעשר ספירות]2 ובנקודים הוא שנחלקו לעשר נקודות וברודים הוא עולם התקון בחי׳ פרצופים כו׳ וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] אליהו אנת הוא דאפיקת עשר תקונין שהם ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דברודים.
division there at all into ten Sefiros; in Nekudim they were divided into ten points; and Berudim is the World of Tikkun (Rectification), the level of partzufim (configurations), etc. And this is what Eliyahu said: “You are He Who brought forth ten tikkunim,” which are the ten Sefiros of Berudim.
In Nekudim the Sefiros separate into ten isolated points (this, the maamar will explain, is the World of Tohu, of chaos). In Berudim, the World of Tikkun, they form partzufim — full configurations in which each Sefirah includes the others. Eliyahu’s “ten tikkunim” are these Sefiros of Berudim.
אמנם שרשם ומקורם שהם בחי׳ עקודים הרי הם בכלי א׳ ממש כל הבחי׳ חו״ב [חכמה ובינה] כו׳ והיינו לפי שהם למעלה מעלה ממהות בחי׳ חכמה ובינה הידועים דאצילות
However, their root and source, which is the level of Akudim — there they are literally in one vessel, all the levels, Chochmah and Binah, etc. This is because they are far, far above the essence of the known levels of Chochmah and Binah of Atzilus.
Their source, Akudim, is where Chochmah, Binah and the rest are literally in one vessel. That is possible because this level is far above the defined Chochmah and Binah of Atzilus.
(והתהוות חכמה ובינה דאצילות הוא יש מאין היינו ע״י צמצום א״ק [אדם קדמון] וצמצום הדיקנא3 עד דאו״א [דאבא ואימא] יונקים רק מבחי׳ שערות כו׳ משא״כ מאצי׳ לבריאה אינו רק ע״י פרסא שאינו מערך הצמצומים אלו שבין א״ק [אדם קדמון] לאצילות ולכן נק׳4 השתלשלות)
(And the coming into being of the Chochmah and Binah of Atzilus is something from nothing, that is, through the tzimtzum (contraction) of Adam Kadmon and the tzimtzum of the Beard, until Abba and Imma draw nourishment only from the level of the hairs, etc.; whereas from Atzilus to Beriah it is only through a parsa (partition), which is not of the order of these contractions between Adam Kadmon and Atzilus; and therefore it is called hishtalshelus.)
A bracketed aside: between Adam Kadmon (the primordial level above Atzilus) and Atzilus there are drastic contractions — of Adam Kadmon, and of the “Beard” — so that Abba and Imma (Chochmah and Binah of Atzilus) receive only through the “hairs.” The Kabbalah pictures the level above Atzilus as a head with a beard, and a hair carries only a faint trace of the life of the head, so receiving through “hairs” is a leap of something from nothing. Between Atzilus and Beriah there is only a parsa, a partition, not a contraction of that order, so the passage there is a continuous chain of descent.
ולכן נקראים בשם ע״ס [עשר ספירות] הגנוזות. ויובן עד״מ כי הנה כחות הנפש5 המתלבשים באברי הגוף הרי הם מתחלקים כל כח מהות בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] ובאבר מיוחד בפ״ע [בפני עצמו].
Therefore they are called by the name “the hidden ten Sefiros.” This will be understood by way of analogy: the powers of the soul that clothe themselves in the limbs of the body are divided, each power a distinct entity of its own, and in a particular limb of its own.
That is why they are called “hidden.” To illustrate, the Alter Rebbe turns to the human soul: its powers, once clothed in the body, are separate from each other, each working through its own organ.
כח הראיה בעין וכח השמיעה באוזן וכח המעשה בידים. וכן בכחות עליונים מהן כח השכל במוח וכח המדות בלב.
The power of sight is in the eye, the power of hearing in the ear, and the power of action in the hands. And so too among the higher powers: the power of intellect is in the brain, and the power of the emotive attributes (middos) in the heart.
Sight works through the eye, hearing through the ear, action through the hands; and the higher powers too — intellect in the brain, emotions in the heart. In the body, each power is distinct and has its own place.
The paragraph identifies “You are wise” with the ten hidden Sefiros, matches this to the Arizal’s Akudim, Nekudim and Berudim, explains why the leap to Atzilus is “something from nothing” while the descent below it is a chain, and begins an analogy from the powers of the soul.
In Likkutei Torah (Bechukosai), cited by the note, the Alter Rebbe says that “the ten hidden Sefiros” of the Geonim correspond, in the Arizal’s terms, to the ten Sefiros of Atik and Arich Anpin — the level of Keser, which is above all the Sefiros of Atzilus. The Tzemach Tzedek (Or HaTorah) notes the Pardes’s view that the hidden Sefiros are the roots of the vessels.
TermsAkudimSefirosTikkunei diknaPartzuf+14
- Akudim עקודים נקודים וברודים explained hereCiting Etz Chaim: in Akudim all ten sefiros are bound in one vessel with no division at all; in Nekudim they divided into ten points; Berudim is the world of Tikkun, partzufim. Akudim, their root, is far above Chochmah and Binah of Atzilus, and is what the Pardes calls the ten sefiros hidden in their Emanator, “You are wise, but not with a known wisdom.”
שבעקודים כל הע״ס הם עקודים בכלי א׳ ואין שם שום התחלקות כלל לע״ס ובנקודים הוא שנחלקו לעשר נקודות וברודים הוא עולם התקון בחי׳ פרצופים
- Sefiros ספירות explained hereFollowing Etz Chaim: in Akudim the ten are bound in one vessel with no division at all (the Pardes’s “ten Sefiros hidden in their Emanator,” far above the known Chochmah and Binah of Atzilus); in Nekudim they divide into ten separate points; in Berudim, the world of Tikkun, they become partzufim.
שבעקודים כל הע״ס הם עקודים בכלי א׳ ואין שם שום התחלקות כלל לע״ס ובנקודים הוא שנחלקו לעשר נקודות וברודים הוא עולם התקון בחי׳ פרצופים
- Tikkunei dikna י״ג תיקוני דיקנא
- Partzuf פרצוף
- Parsa, masach פרסא ומסך
- Re’iyah and shmiah ראיה ושמיעה
- Se’aros שערות
- Yesh me’ayin יש מאין
- Tohu and Tikkun תהו ותקון
- Tzimtzum צמצום
- Binah בינה
- Abba and Imma אבא ואמא
- Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
- Asiyah עשיה
- Beriah בריאה
- Atzilus אצילות
- Middos מדות
Also Chochmah
Marei mekomos
- 1בלשון הפרדס עשר ספירות הגנוזות · נתבאר בלקו״ת בחקותי מו, ג. ובארוכה ספר הערכים-חב״ד כרך ג ע׳ רכז ואילך. אוה״ת ענינים ע׳ קא ואילך. שם ע׳ קע מבאר שיטת הפרדס שענין ע״ס הגנוזות הם שרשי הכלים. וראה שם ע׳ של ואילך. באוה״ת סידור ע׳ קנה מציין לכאן.
- 2ואין שם שום התחלקות כלל לע״ס · נתבאר בארוכה באוה״ת בשלח ע׳ שצד ואילך. בד״ה כל הנהנה תרנ״ב ע׳ ק ואילך. אוה״ת ענינים ע׳ שיב. סה״מ תרל״ג כרך א ע׳ שטז. בלקו״ת אמור לח, א מציין לכאן.
- 3היינו ע״י צמצום א״ק וצמצום הדיקנא · ראה תניא שער היחוד והאמונה פ״ט בהגהה. שרש מצות התפלה פרק לט (רלז, א).
- 4ולכן נק׳ בשם ע״ס הגנוזות · במאמרי אדה״ז — פרשיות ע׳ סד ”דלכאורה דבר זה כפלא יחשב דאם הן גנוזות בהעלם העצמות ממש א״כ איך ימצאו במספר ע״ס דוקא הלא אור העצמות הוא אור פשוט בתכלית למעלה מבחי׳ התחלקות לגמרי. ראה תורת חיים כאן סט, א דמבאר הקושיא יותר ”דאיך ימצא המספר שהוא הגבול מלמעלה מן המספר ובלתי בע״ג” ע״ש בארוכה.
- 5ויובן עד״מ כי הנה כחות הנפש · נתבאר בארוכה בתו״ח שמות לז, ב (צילום כת״י הר״ש סופר). בדרך מצותיך עו, ב. ובאוה״ת שמות כרך ז ע׳ ב׳תצא ואילך. אוה״ת ענינים ע׳ רסט. שכח. המשל מכחות הנפש — ראה לקמן יג, ג ובארוכה בד״ה הגהות לפתח אליהו — תרנ״ח. בלקו״ת שה״ש ד, ב מציין לכאן: מהות הנפש שכל ומדות כו׳ (ר״ל שהוא מקור השכל והמדות כמ״ש בביאור ע״פ ולא תשבית מלח ובד״ה הן עם אחד ובד״ה פתח אלי׳).
7והנה כל כחות אלו נמשכים ומתפשטים מן הנפש האחת שהיא עצם1 א׳ וא״כ החילוקי כחות הנ״ל כשהיו עדיין כלולים בהנפש ודאי היו כולם בהתכללות אחת ממש בלי שום התחלקות וכמו שהנפש היא עצם א׳.
Now all these powers are drawn and spread forth from the one soul, which is a single essence. If so, the distinct powers mentioned above, when they were still included in the soul, were certainly all in literally one inclusion, without any division, just as the soul is a single essence.
All of the soul’s powers come from one soul, and the soul is a single, simple essence. So before they were drawn into the body, while still within the soul, they must have been completely merged, with no separation at all.
The analogy’s central point: powers that are separate in the body are one within the soul, because the soul itself is one.
The Tzemach Tzedek (Or HaTorah, Inyanim) adds that otherwise the soul would be divided into 248 distinct parts, like the body’s limbs — which cannot be, since it is one spiritual essence.
The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research
Background from the Rebbe
In a letter of 16 Teves 5704, answering why the Chanukah lights alone have a degree of “mehadrin min hamehadrin” and why their miracle came then, the Rebbe adds what he found on it in Chassidus, and there sets Akudim beside the hidden cruse of oil (הפך שמן).
This paragraph explains Akudim by the soul’s powers, which before they spread into the limbs „כשהיו עדיין כלולים בהנפש ודאי היו כולם בהתכללות אחת ממש” (are all one inside the soul). The Rebbe cites this explanation (“Torah Ohr at the end of Noach, and more fully Torah Chaim there”) and sets it beside the Mitteler Rebbe’s reading of the Chanukah cruse of oil: „העלם עצמות התענוג טרם שבא לגילוי בחכמה” (the hidden essence of delight before it comes into Chochmah), where all the stirrings of will and delight are included as one. He ends, „ועדיין צ״ע בזה” (“this still needs study”).
The Alter Rebbe
כשהיו עדיין כלולים בהנפש ודאי היו כולם בהתכללות אחת ממש בלי שום התחלקות
The Rebbe
בביאור ענין עקודים (תו״א ס״פ נח ובביאור יותר בתו״ח שם. ועוד) שהוא עד״מ בכחות הנפש כמו שהם כלולים עדיין בהנפש בלי שום התחלקות
Igros Kodesh, vol. א, p. רכו (letter 125, pp. רכא–רכו; in the letter’s body: the paragraph after its lettered excerpts א–ב that compares them, begun on p. רכה, "ולכאורה ב׳ פירושים הנ״ל אחד הם") · יום ד׳ ט״ז טבת, תש״ד
Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made
TermsHiskallelus
- Hiskallelus התכללות
Marei mekomos
- 1שהיא עצם א׳ · באוה״ת ענינים ע׳ רסט ”שלפ״ז יהי׳ בההתחלקות לרמ״ח חלקים שונים כו׳ וזה אינו שהוא עצם א׳ רוחני”.
8ואיך הוא זה והלא אנו רואים ראיה ושמיעה הם שני בחינות שונות זו מזו אלא ודאי משום כשהיו בחי׳
And how can this be? Do we not see that sight and hearing are two levels different from one another? Rather, it must certainly be that when
An objection: sight and hearing are plainly different things. How can they be “one” in the soul?
כחות אלו בנפש הם בבחי׳ דקה ורוחני׳ יותר לאין שיעור מכשהם אח״כ בגוף החומרי עד ששם הם כולם מיוחדים כאלו הם רק דבר1 א׳ ממש.
these powers were in the soul, they were in a state infinitely finer and more spiritual than afterwards, when they are in the physical body — so much so that there they are all united as if they were literally only one thing.
The answer: within the soul these powers exist in a form infinitely subtler and more spiritual than in the body, so there they are united as if they were literally one thing. This will serve as the model for the Sefiros, which are ten distinct things in Atzilus but one in their hidden root.
The paragraph answers the obvious objection to the analogy: the difference between sight and hearing belongs to their bodily form; in the soul’s subtler state they are as if one thing.
TermsRe’iyah and shmiahYesh and ayin
- Re’iyah and shmiah ראיה ושמיעה
- Yesh and ayin יש ואין
Marei mekomos
- 1ששם הם כולם מיוחדים כאלו הם רק דבר א׳ ממש · ראה באוה״ת שמות כרך ז ע׳ ב׳תצב. דרך מצותיך עז, א.
9ועד״ז יובן הנמשל שענין ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דאצי׳ שהם כל בחי׳ בכלי בפ״ע [בפני עצמו]1 חכמה בחי׳ בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] וחסד בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] כו׳
In the same way the analogue will be understood: the ten Sefiros of Atzilus are each a level in a vessel of its own — Chochmah a level of its own, and Chesed of its own, etc.
Now the analogy is applied. The Sefiros of Atzilus are like the soul’s powers once they are in the body: each is distinct, with its own vessel — Chochmah here, Chesed there.
אבל בשרשן בבחי׳ ע״ס [עשר ספירות] י, דהגנוזות הם בעילוי יותר דק ונעלה לאין קץ עד ששם הם כולם רק דבר א׳ ממש וזהו שהן עקודים בכלי א׳ ממש.
But in their root, at the level of the hidden ten Sefiros, they are in a state infinitely finer and more exalted, so much so that there they are all literally only one thing; and this is [the meaning of] their being Akudim, [bound together] in literally one vessel.
Their root, the hidden ten Sefiros, is like the soul’s powers within the soul itself: so subtle and exalted that they are simply one. That is what “Akudim” means — all the Sefiros bound together in a single vessel.
וזה שבאצי׳ חכמה וחסד הם שני דברים שונים זמ״ז [זה מזה] היינו לפי שחכמה דאצי׳ אינה בערך כלל מהות החכמה דעקודים וכנ״ל שהיא הנק׳ חכמה ידיעא.
And the fact that in Atzilus Chochmah and Chesed are two things different from each other is because the Chochmah of Atzilus bears no comparison at all to the essence of the Chochmah of Akudim, and, as [stated] above, it is what is called “a known wisdom.”
Why then are Chochmah and Chesed separate things in Atzilus? Because the Chochmah of Atzilus is a different order of being from the Chochmah of Akudim, not a slightly lower version of it. That is why it is called “a known wisdom,” while the Chochmah of Akudim is not.
The analogy of the soul is applied: the Sefiros are separate in Atzilus, as the powers are in the body’s organs, but one in their hidden root in Akudim, as the powers are within the soul.
In Likkutei Torah (Behar), to which the note points, the Alter Rebbe calls Akudim, where the ten Sefiros are bound in one vessel and not yet divided, “Adam of Yetzirah”; Adam Kadmon, higher still, he calls “Adam of Beriah,” because relative to the Emanator even it comes into being as something from nothing.
TermsAkudimEin arochSefirosYesh and ayin+3
- Akudim עקודים נקודים וברודים
- Ein aroch אין ערוך
- Sefiros ספירות
- Yesh and ayin יש ואין
- Chesed חסד
- Atzilus אצילות
Also Chochmah
Marei mekomos
- 1שו״ה ועד״ז — כל בחי׳ בכלי בפ״ע · ראה לקו״ת בהר מג, ד.
The descent to Nekudim ¶10
10והנה אח״כ נמשך בחי׳ עולם הנקודים ושם כל ספי׳ [ספירה / ספירות] בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] והן עשר נקודות. והיינו שכבר ירדו בירידה גדולה ממדרגת ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דעקודים שהן כולם דבר א׳ כנ״ל משא״כ בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] דנקודים וזהו כמו בחי׳ חכמה ידיעא כו׳.
Now afterwards the level of the World of Nekudim was drawn forth, and there each Sefirah is on its own, and they are ten points. That is, they had already descended in a great descent from the rank of the ten Sefiros of Akudim, which are all one thing, as [stated] above — which is not so in the ten Sefiros of Nekudim; and this is like the level of “a known wisdom,” etc.
After Akudim came the World of Nekudim (“points”), where each Sefirah stands alone as a separate point. This is a great descent from Akudim, where all are one; the Sefiros of Nekudim are now defined and separate, like “a known wisdom.”
(והרי מובן גודל הצמצום והירידה כי מלבד זה שבעקודים וע״ס [ועשר ספירות] הגנוזות היו בעילוי רב יותר עד שנק׳ חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא כנ״ל.
(And so the greatness of the contraction and the descent is understood: for besides the fact that in Akudim and the hidden ten Sefiros they were at a much greater elevation, so much so that it is called “wise, but not with a known wisdom,” as [stated] above,
A long bracketed aside explains how great the descent from Akudim to Nekudim is. The first difference has already been given: in Akudim wisdom is so exalted that it is “wise, but not with a known wisdom.”
הרי עוד זאת כי התם כיון שכולן בכלי א׳ ואין בהם שום התחלקות א״כ בהמשכת בחי׳ חכמה עד״מ הרי יש בזה כל הע״ס [העשר ספירות] הגנוזות יחד ולא בחי׳ חכמה בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] כיון דהתם אין חכמה בחי׳ בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] כלל לבדה.
there is this besides: since there they are all in one vessel and there is no division in them at all, then in drawing forth the level of Chochmah, for example, all the hidden ten Sefiros are present in it together, and not the level of Chochmah on its own, since there Chochmah is not a level on its own, by itself, at all.
The second difference: because in Akudim everything is in one vessel, whatever flows from its “Chochmah” is really all ten hidden Sefiros at once. There is no such thing there as Chochmah by itself.
כ״א כל הע״ס [העשר ספירות] הגנוזות הם דבר1 א׳ ממש. א״כ אין שייך כלל לומר המשכת חכמה בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] כ״א המשכת דבר הנק׳ ע״ס [עשר ספירות] הגנוזות כו׳ יחד.
Rather, all the hidden ten Sefiros are literally one thing. If so, it is not at all fitting to speak of drawing forth Chochmah on its own, but only of drawing forth the thing called the hidden ten Sefiros, etc., together.
So in Akudim one cannot even speak of drawing down Chochmah alone. What flows is the single whole called the hidden ten Sefiros.
משא״כ בבחי׳ ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דנקודים נתצמצם להיות חכמה נמשכת בחי׳ א׳ לבדה ממש וכן חסד כו׳.
Whereas in the level of the ten Sefiros of Nekudim it was contracted, so that Chochmah is drawn forth as literally one level alone, and likewise Chesed, etc.
In Nekudim the light was contracted, so that Chochmah flows out as one level alone, Chesed alone, and so on. The whole has broken up into parts.
והרי מובן שאין ערוך כלל בחי׳ חכמה כשהיא בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] לבחי׳ הכוללת כל הע״ס [העשר ספירות] יחד ממש וכמו שאין ערוך אות אחת הנפרדת מתיבת למשפחותיכם234 עד״מ לגבי התיבה כולה כשהיו כל האותיות יחד.
And so it is understood that the level of Chochmah on its own bears no comparison at all to the level that includes all ten Sefiros literally together — just as, by way of analogy, a single letter separated from the word lemishpechoseichem (“by your families”) bears no comparison to the whole word, when all the letters were together.
A single attribute on its own cannot compare with the whole that contains all ten together. The Alter Rebbe’s illustration is a long word from the Torah, lemishpechoseichem: one letter taken out of it is nothing compared with the whole word, which carries meaning only when all its letters are together.
מלבד מה שבחי׳ החכמה זו כשהיא בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] נק׳ חכמה ידיעא משא״כ החכמה דע״ס [דעשר ספירות] דעקודים נק׳ חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא. וגם ע״ז שייך אנת הוא חד ולא בחושבן כיון שאין שם בחי׳ התחלקות עשר ספירות כנ״ל.
This is besides the fact that this level of Chochmah, when it is on its own, is called “a known wisdom,” whereas the Chochmah of the ten Sefiros of Akudim is called “wise, but not with a known wisdom.” And to this, too, “You are One, but not in number” applies, since there there is no division into ten Sefiros, as [stated] above.
On top of that, Chochmah on its own is “a known wisdom,” while the Chochmah of Akudim is “wise, but not with a known wisdom.” And since there is no division into ten there, Akudim can also be described as “One, but not in number.”
ומ״מ אור א״ס ב״ה עצמו הוא למעלה מעלה מבחי׳ עקודים כי גם עקודים נק׳ אדם דבריאה לגבי א״ס ב״ה ועמ״ש ע״פ את שבתותי תשמרו56 בענין שבת תתאה ושבת עלאה).
Nevertheless, the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, itself is far, far above the level of Akudim; for even Akudim is called Adam of Beriah relative to the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He. And see what is written on [the verse] “You shall keep My Sabbaths,” concerning the lower Shabbos and the higher Shabbos.)
Still, Akudim is not G‑d’s Essence: compared with the Infinite One, even Akudim is only “Adam of Beriah,” as if created. The Alter Rebbe refers to his maamar on “You shall keep My Sabbaths” (Likkutei Torah, Behar 2:28–29), which explains the plural “Sabbaths” as two: the lower Shabbos, the nullification of “something” into “nothing” at the level of Chochmah, and the higher Shabbos, the true nullification above Chochmah.
ועד״ז ההפרש בין הארת הקו להרשימו7 שנשאר אחר הצמצום ומקום פנוי. דהנה הארת הקו מאיר בכל עולם לפי ערכו8 אך הרשימו היא בחי׳ הכוללת לכל העולמות.9
And in the same way [is] the difference between the illumination of the kav (line of light) and the reshimu (impression) that remained after the tzimtzum (contraction) and the vacated space. For the illumination of the kav shines in each world according to its measure, but the reshimu is the level that includes all the worlds.
The same pattern is found in another pair of Kabbalistic concepts. After the first tzimtzum, when the Infinite Light withdrew to leave a “vacated space,” a thin line of light, the kav, was drawn back into it, and a trace of the withdrawn light, the reshimu, remained. The kav shines into each world according to that world’s capacity, like the separate Sefiros; the reshimu is one general level that includes all worlds, like Akudim.
(וצ״ע [וצריך עיון] דמבואר בכמה מקומות דהקו גבוה הרבה מהרשימו וע׳ באגה״ק [באגרת הקודש] מאמר איהו וחיוהי10 הארת הקו והארה דהארה והארה דהארה דהארה11 כו׳):
(This requires further study, for it is explained in several places that the kav is much higher than the reshimu. And see in Iggeres HaKodesh, the discourse “He and His life-force”: the illumination of the kav, and a glimmer of a glimmer, and a glimmer of a glimmer of a glimmer, etc.)
The Alter Rebbe marks a difficulty: in many places the kav is described as far higher than the reshimu, and the Tanya’s Iggeres HaKodesh speaks of the illumination of the kav and of ever-fainter “glimmers of glimmers” below it. How can the reshimu then be compared to the higher, inclusive level? He leaves the question open for further study.
The paragraph describes the descent from Akudim to Nekudim, where the Sefiros first became separate, explains why a single attribute on its own is incomparable to the undivided whole, and notes that even Akudim is far below the Infinite Light. It closes with a parallel, left open to question, between the kav and the reshimu.
On the difficulty about the kav and the reshimu, the Tzemach Tzedek (Or HaTorah) suggests that in revelation the kav is higher, since it brings revelation into Atzilus and above, and its root is in the Infinite Light above the tzimtzum. The reshimu, however, is light that the tzimtzum never touched at all. He notes that the Mikdash Melech identifies the reshimu with the Or HaKadmon (the Primordial Light).
Explained elsewhere AI research
Explained by the Rebbe Rashab, the Rebbe, Kehot and HaMelech BiMesibo, an appendix compiled by a student
The bracketed question, „וצ״ע דמבואר בכמה מקומות דהקו גבוה הרבה מהרשימו” (“this requires further study, for it is explained in several places that the kav is much higher than the reshimu...”), leaves open how the reshimu can be the inclusive, higher level. Our commentary presents it as the Alter Rebbe’s own open question; the Kehot note calls it the Tzemach Tzedek’s.
According to the Kehot note, the bracketed question, how the reshimu can be the inclusive level when the kav is far higher, is a gloss of the Tzemach Tzedek, and he himself answers it, citing this passage: the reshimu is only an impression, but of the whole light that filled the space, not of the kav alone, though hidden, while the kav’s advantage is that it shines in revelation (Or HaTorah, Bereishis vol. 7, Vayera, pp. 2386–2387). The Rebbe Rashab, citing this maamar and its additions (Sefer HaMaamarim 5680 p. קיח), explains why the reshimu is rooted higher: in the mind, holding a thought back is a deeper power than letting it spread, and so the reshimu, the power of concealment, „ושרש הרשימו למעלה משרש הקו” (is rooted higher than the kav); the kav comes from the light the tzimtzum touched, the reshimu from the whole light it never touched, building on the Rebbe Maharash’s gloss on this passage, which the Rebbe calls „ההגהה המפורסמת” (“the famous gloss”) (Toras Menachem 5730 vol. 1 p. 200). The Rebbe sets out the same explanation in his maamar of 12 Tammuz 5714, on the same verse as the Rebbe Rashab’s.
the Rebbe Rashab: Sefer HaMaamarim 5680 (תר״פ), from his manuscript, p. קיח
ושרש הרשימו למעלה משרש הקו שנמשך מהעיגול הגדול שהוא האוא״ס שנגע בו הצמצום, והרשימו הוא מכללות האור דא״ס שלא נגע בו הצמצום
the Rebbe: Sefer HaMaamarim 5714 (new edition, unedited), maamar “Lemaan yechaltzun yedidecha”, 12 Tammuz 5714, p. רא
שענינו של הקו הוא להאיר אור עד למטה מטה, וענינו של הרשימו הוא כח ההעלם, הנה שרש הרשימו הוא למעלה משרש הקו
Kehot (notes to Torah Ohr): note 10:58 on this paragraph
בענין הצ״ע ראה בספר שערי ענינים בדא״ח כרך ב שער החמישי סי׳ ח שמבאר בארוכה הצ״ע של הצ״צ
the Rebbe: Toras Menachem – Hisvaduyos 5730 vol. 1 (58), unedited, p. 200
ההגהה המפורסמת בענין אותיות הרשימו שלא נגע בהם הצמצום
HaMelech BiMesibo, an appendix compiled by a student (not the Rebbe’s words): HaMelech BiMesibo vol. 2 (5730–5731), vol. ב, p. רסח
ומקשה ע״ז אדמו״ר הצ״צ בהגהותיו לתו״א: ”וצ״ע דמבואר בכ״מ דהקו גבוה הרבה מהרשימו כו׳”
Where the maamar leaves something unexplained, found by AI in the library and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.
The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research
The Rebbe explains
At the farbrengen of Shabbos Parshas Terumah, eve of 7 Adar I 5746, explaining his father’s notes on the Zohar about the tzimtzum and what they teach for a person’s avodah, the Rebbe quotes this paragraph’s words on the reshimu (רשימו).
This paragraph says „הארת הקו מאיר בכל עולם לפי ערכו” (the kav shines in each world by its measure), while the reshimu is „בחי׳ הכוללת לכל העולמות” (“the level that includes all the worlds”). The Rebbe quotes these words and adds: the reshimu is an impression of the whole Infinite Light before the tzimtzum, from a level the tzimtzum did not touch, all of it held there in concealment. In avodah, he says, a person’s bittul must be complete, like the first tzimtzum, yet within it a “reshimu” remains that includes all that is above his own light and revelation; that is why bittul never makes him „אסקופה הנדרסת” (“a trodden threshold”), and it gives him the strength to serve with breadth, „ואתהלכה ברחבה” (“I will walk in broad places”).
The Alter Rebbe
אך הרשימו היא בחי׳ הכוללת לכל העולמות
The Rebbe
דארף אין דעם גופא בלייבן א ”רשימו” וואס איז כולל אלע ענינים שלמעלה מבחי׳ אור וגילויים שלו
Sichos Kodesh 5746, vol. ב (19, כסלו–אדר), p. 695–696 (section כג) · ש״פ תרומה, ערב ז׳ אדר ראשון, ה׳תשמ״ו (הנחת התמימים, בלתי מוגה)
Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made
TermsReshimuAkudimKavIhu vegarmohi+11
- Reshimu רשימו explained hereHere, as Akudim hold all ten as one, the reshimu encompasses all worlds, while the kav shines in each by its measure; it queries sources ranking the kav higher.
דהנה הארת הקו מאיר בכל עולם לפי ערכו אך הרשימו היא בחי׳ הכוללת לכל העולמות
- Akudim עקודים נקודים וברודים explained hereNekudim is a great descent from Akudim. In Akudim, drawing Chochmah draws all ten hidden sefiros together as one thing; in Nekudim Chochmah is drawn alone, a “known wisdom.” A single sefirah on its own bears no comparison to the whole, like one letter taken out of a word.
שכבר ירדו בירידה גדולה ממדרגת ע״ס דעקודים שהן כולם דבר א׳ כנ״ל משא״כ בע״ס דנקודים
- Kav קו
- Ihu vegarmohi איהו וגרמוהי חד
- Ein aroch אין ערוך
- Sefiros ספירות
- Tzimtzum צמצום
- Shabbos שבת
- Ein Sof אין סוף
- Osiyos אותיות
- Chesed חסד
- Beriah בריאה
Marei mekomos
- 1כ״א כל הע״ס הגנוזות הם דבר א׳ ממש · באוה״ת ענינים ע׳ רפב ואילך מבאר שיטת האריז״ל בעקודים איך הם נקראים ע״ס. וראה שם בעמוד רפד מה שמעתיק מהנחות הר״פ ע׳ קסט. וראה גם במאמרי אדה״ז פרשיות פ׳ נח ע׳ סו. וע׳ סז. באוה״ת ענינים ע׳ רפה וכנראה שמציין לד״ה זה, שכאן מבאר דע״ס הגנוזות לא שייך בא״ס רק הן בעקודים וכן מבואר בכמה דרושים, ושם מציין להנחות הר״פ הנ״ל דשם משמע דאפי׳ באור א״ס הבלתי מוגבל שלמעלה מהקו שייך ספירות ע״ש.
- 2מתיבת למשפחותיכם · Menachot 30a
- 3למשפחותיכם · Exodus 12:21
- 4למשפחותיכם · Numbers 33:54
- 5ועמ״ש ע״פ את שבתותי תשמרו · ראה לקו״ת בהר מג, ב.
- 6את שבתותי תשמרו · Leviticus 26:2
- 7שו״ה בענין — ועד״ז ההפרש בין הארת הקו להרשימו · מובא באוה״ת כי תצא ע׳ תתקכד.
- 8הארת הקו מאיר בכל עולם לפי ערכו · ראה באוה״ת בשלח ע׳ תצה. ובביאוה״ז לכ״ק הצ״צ כרך א ע׳ פח ואילך בענין המשכה שע״י הקו.
- 9בחי׳ הכוללת לכל העולמות · באוה״ת פ׳ כי תצא ע׳ תתקכד מציין ע״ז כ״ק אדמו״ר הצ״צ ”ועי׳ במק״מ שהרשימו הו״ע האור הקדמון” ע״ש בארוכה. ובמאמרי אדמו״ר הזקן תקס״ח ע׳ שכח.
- 10וע׳ באגה״ק מאמר איהו וחיוהי · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 20:22
- 11שו״ה וצ״ע . . דהארה דהארה · ראה ביאור ע״ז באוה״ת פ׳ נח (מלקו״ת לג׳ פרשיות) תתשצד, א. ובדף תתרסח, ב מתרץ וז״ל: ”ואולי י״ל שבענין הגילוי הקו גבוה יותר שע״י הארת הקו נמשך הגילוי באצי׳ ובלמעלה מהאצי׳, וגם כי שורש ענין בקיעת הקו הוא באוא״ס שלמעלה מהצמצום שהוא בוקע להיות נמשך בחי׳ צמצום הקו כו׳, אמנם הרשימו היא בלתי צמצום כלל, שהרי מה שנתצמצם עד שלא נשאר רק רשימו . . נסתלק לצדדי׳ . . ומה שנשאר בבחי׳ הרשימו ה״ז אור שלא נגע בו הצמצום כלל” ע״ש עוד פי׳. ובכרך ז תתשצד, א כתב שכן דעת המק״מ בפ׳ בראשית בביאור בריש הורמנותא. וכן מציין לזה בד״ה קן ציפור אוה״ת כי תצא ע׳ תתקכד. בענין הצ״ע ראה בספר שערי ענינים בדא״ח כרך ב שער החמישי סי׳ ח שמבאר בארוכה הצ״ע של הצ״צ, ומה שכתב כ״ק מהר״ש על ענין זה. וראה גם באוה״ת ענינים ע׳ קסו. ובארוכה בהמשך ר״ה תרס״א ע׳ קסו ואילך. המשך יונתי תר״מ פרק ו. תער״ב ח״ג ע׳ א׳רסט מציין להלקו״ת לג״פ.
Tohu and Tikkun; the Name Mah ¶11
11והנה בעולם הנקודים12 הי׳ [היה] שבה״כ [שבירת הכלים] שזהו ענין עולם התהו והיינו לפי שהיו רק בבחי׳ נקודות כל3 א׳ בחי׳ בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] ואח״כ עולם הברודים הוא עולם התקון שנעשו בבחי׳ פרצופים שהוא להיות בחי׳ התכללות.
Now in the World of Nekudim there was the shattering of the vessels, which is the matter of the World of Tohu (chaos); that is because they were only in the state of points, each a level on its own. And afterwards the World of Berudim is the World of Tikkun (rectification), in which they became partzufim (configurations), which is to be a state of inclusion,
In Nekudim the vessels shattered; this is the World of Tohu (chaos). They broke because each Sefirah was a lone point that could not join the others. In the World of Tikkun (Berudim) the Sefiros became partzufim, full configurations in which each includes the others.
שלא יהיה חכמה בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] כ״א תהיה כלולה ג״כ מכל הע״ס [העשר ספירות] ונק׳ פרצוף אבא וכן פרצוף ז״א4 שעיקרו בחי׳ המדות
so that Chochmah would not be on its own, but would also be included of all ten Sefiros, and it is called the partzuf of Abba; and likewise the partzuf of Z’eir Anpin, whose essence is the level of the emotive attributes (middos),
In Tikkun, Chochmah does not stand alone: it contains all ten Sefiros within itself and becomes the partzuf of Abba (“Father”). Likewise Z’eir Anpin, the configuration of the emotions, contains all the Sefiros.
אך כולן היו כלולים יחד וגם המוחי׳ [המוחין] דאו״א [דאבא ואימא] מאירים בהם. וה״ז [והרי זה] מעלה יתירה מבבחי׳ נקודים שהי׳ [שהיה] רק כל בחי׳ בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] חסד לבדו וגבורה לבדו.
but they were all included together, and the mochin (intellect) of Abba and Imma, too, shine within them. And this is a surpassing advantage over the level of Nekudim, where each level was only on its own: Chesed by itself and Gevurah by itself.
In Z’eir Anpin all the emotions are included together, and the intellect of Abba and Imma shines within them. This is a great advantage over Nekudim, where Chesed stood alone and Gevurah stood alone.
אבל בתקון יש בחי׳ התכללות והתחברות (כמו עד״מ חבור האותיות שנפרדו להיות מצטרפין יחד לתיבות ומ״מ אין זה כמו בחי׳ עקודים שהיו כולן דבר א׳ ממש עד שהיו רק בכלי א׳
But in Tikkun there is inclusion and joining (as, by way of analogy, the joining of letters that were separate so that they combine together into words. Nevertheless, this is not like the level of Akudim, where they were all literally one thing, so much so that they were only in one vessel;
The inclusion of Tikkun is like separate letters joining to form words. But it is not the oneness of Akudim, where everything was truly one in a single vessel.
משא״כ בברודים שכל ספירה יש לה כלי בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] רק שמתכללים מכל הע״ס [העשר ספירות] וכו׳ ומ״מ ע״י התכללות זו מאיר בהן הארה עליונה מא״ס ב״ה כי אור א״ס ב״ה מאיר ונמשך דוקא במקום שיש חבור והתכללות.
whereas in Berudim each Sefirah has a vessel of its own, only that they are included of all ten Sefiros, etc. Nevertheless, through this inclusion a supernal illumination from the Infinite One, blessed be He, shines in them; for the Infinite Light, blessed be He, shines and is drawn specifically in a place where there is joining and inclusion.
In Tikkun each Sefirah keeps its own vessel and yet includes all the others. Through this joining a higher light from the Infinite One shines in them, because the Infinite Light rests specifically where there is joining and inclusion.
וכמו למטה זכר ונקבה בראם ועי״ז ויברך אותם5 ע״י ההתכללות כו׳ וכמו בצירוף עשרה אומרים דבר שבקדושה דאכל בי עשרה שכינתא שריא6 משא״כ אם היו אלו העשרה כ״א [כל אחד / כל אחת] בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] כו׳).
So too below: “Male and female He created them,” and through this, “and He blessed them” — through the inclusion, etc. And so too, when ten are joined together they say a matter of holiness, for “over every ten the Shechinah rests” — which is not so if these ten were each on their own, etc.)
Two examples from our world: G‑d blessed man and woman only once they were joined, as the verse says, “Male and female He created them, and He blessed them”; and ten Jews who join together can say the prayers of holiness that need a minyan, a quorum of ten, because the Shechinah rests on a group of ten — which is not so for ten individuals each on his own.
וזהו ע״י שם מ״ה [שם מ״ה] המאיר בעולם התקון7 ששרשו למעלה מבחי׳ נקודים כי הוא שם מ״ה [שם מ״ה] דא״ק [דאדם קדמון]8 שהוא בחי׳ האור הכללי ע״ד הנ״ל בעקודים ע״כ ממנו נמשך התקון שיהיה נעשה ההתכללות בברודים
And this is through the Name Mah that shines in the World of Tikkun, whose root is above the level of Nekudim; for it is the Name Mah of Adam Kadmon, which is the level of the all-inclusive light, in the manner mentioned above regarding Akudim. Therefore from it the Tikkun is drawn forth, so that inclusion comes about in Berudim.
What brings about the inclusion of Tikkun is the Name Mah — Havayah spelled out so that its letters total 45, the numerical value of mah. It is rooted in Adam Kadmon, above Nekudim, and like Akudim it is a general, all-inclusive light; that is why it can bring the separate Sefiros together.
והיינו כי שם מ״ה [שם מ״ה] הוא בחי׳ בטול מלשון ונחנו מה9 וההתכללות נמשך מחמת הבטול לאור יא, אא״ס ב״ה. ולכן ע״י שם מ״ה [שם מ״ה] נעשה ג״כ ההתכללות בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] דתיקון כו׳:
That is, the Name Mah is the level of self-nullification (bittul), from the expression “and what (mah) are we?” — and the inclusion is drawn forth because of the bittul before the Infinite Light, blessed be He. Therefore, through the Name Mah, the inclusion in the ten Sefiros of Tikkun also comes about, etc.
Mah means “what,” as when Moshe and Aharon said, “And what are we?” — an expression of self-nullification. The Sefiros can include one another only when each sets aside its own separate existence before the Infinite Light; so the Name Mah, which is bittul, is what makes the Tikkun.
The paragraph explains that Tohu shattered because each Sefirah stood alone, while Tikkun endures because its Sefiros include one another; this inclusion draws a higher light from the Infinite One, and it comes about through the Name Mah, the quality of self-nullification.
The Mitteler Rebbe’s transcript of this maamar (Maamarei Admur HaZaken) distinguishes three stages: a point (nekudah), which is not divided into ten; a Sefirah, where each of the ten contains ten (Chochmah of Chesed, Chesed of Chesed …); and a partzuf, where each of those is further included of ten again. That full inclusion is the essence of Tikkun, called the partzuf of Adam. It also cites Etz Chaim that the inclusion of Tikkun comes from the illumination of the new Name Mah that shines from Adam Kadmon.
TermsPartzufHiskallelusAkudimShechinah+13
- Partzuf פרצוף explained hereHere, partzufim mean inter-inclusion: in Tikkun (Berudim) each Sefirah, e.g. Chochmah, includes all ten, unlike Tohu’s separate points; this inclusion stems from the name Mah, bittul.
שנעשו בבחי׳ פרצופים שהוא להיות בחי׳ התכללות. שלא יהיה חכמה בפ״ע כ״א תהיה כלולה ג״כ מכל הע״ס
- Hiskallelus התכללות explained hereIn Nekudim, the world of Tohu, each Sefirah was a point on its own (Chesed alone, Gevurah alone) and the vessels shattered; in Berudim, the world of Tikkun, they became partzufim, each included of all ten. This is less than Akudim, where all were one in a single vessel, yet through it Or Ein Sof shines, for it rests where there is joining and inclusion. It comes from the Name Mah, which is bittul.
עולם הברודים הוא עולם התקון שנעשו בבחי׳ פרצופים שהוא להיות בחי׳ התכללות
- Akudim עקודים נקודים וברודים
- Shechinah שכינה
- Mah and Ban מ״ה וב״ן
- Sefiros ספירות
- Tohu and Tikkun תהו ותקון
- Gevurah גבורה
- Z’eir Anpin זעיר אנפין
- Abba and Imma אבא ואמא
- Ein Sof אין סוף
- Osiyos אותיות
- Chesed חסד
- Middos מדות
Marei mekomos
- 1בעולם הנקודים הי׳ שבה״כ · ראה ע״ח שער ז פ״א. דרך מצותיך ביאור ושבתה קע, א.
- 2בעולם הנקודים הי׳ שבה״כ · Sefer Etz Chaim 7:1
- 3לפי שהיו רק בבחי׳ נקודות כל א׳ בחי׳ בפ״ע · וכ״ה לקמן. ובמאמרי אדה״ז פרשיות ע׳ סט מבאר זה יותר שכ׳ ”אבל כאו״א אינו מתחלק עוד לי׳” ע״ש בארוכה. ונתבאר בתו״ח כאן עה, ג בענין ב׳ מיני התחלקות דתהו ותיקון.
- 4ונק׳ פרצוף אבא וכן פרצוף ז״א · ההפרש בין נקודה ספירה ופרצוף (המובא בע״ח שער הפרצופים פ״ז) מבואר במאמרי אדה״ז פרשיות ע׳ סט ”שהנקודה בלתי מתחלק לי׳, ובחי׳ הספירה היינו שכאו״א מהי״ס מתחלק לי״ס כמו אור החסד מתחלק לי״ס כחב״ד שבחסד חג״ת שבחסד כו׳ ואז נק׳ ספירה, ובחי׳ הפרצוף הוא ריבוי התחלקות יותר, דהיינו שגם הע״ס שכלולים בכאו״א מהי״ס מתכללים עוד להיות כלול כאו״א מי׳, וכמו חסד שבחסד שבגבורה . . והוא עיקר בחי׳ התיקון שנק׳ פרצוף אדם” ע״ש. וראה בשרש מצות התפלה פרק מו. באוה״ת פ׳ פנחס ע׳ א׳פח (מיוסדים על סה״מ תקס״ה כרך ב ע׳ תשמח) שמביא משל לזה מזריעה.
- 5זכר ונקבה בראם ועי״ז ויברך אותם · Genesis 5:2
- 6דאכל בי עשרה שכינתא שריא · Sanhedrin 39a:11
- 7ע״י שם מ״ה המאיר בעולם התקון · Sefer Etz Chaim 7:2:1–2
- 8ע״י שם מ״ה המאיר בעולם התיקון . . שם מ״ה דא״ק · במאמרי אדה״ז פרשיות שם ע׳ עא בשם הע״ח [שער ז פרק ב] שסיבת התהוות ההתכללות בעולם הברודים הנק׳ עולם התיקון הוא ע״י הארת שם מ״ה החדש שמאיר בא״ק. וראה ד״ה ושבתה בדרך מצותיך קע, א.
- 9ונחנו מה · Exodus 16:7
Tiferes, Torah and peace ¶12
12ומעתה יובן מה דבתפארת בהכלי ג״כ הוא מבחי׳ שם הוי״ה1 משא״כ בכלים דחו״ג [דחסד וגבורה] כי הנה עיקר ההתכללות הנעשה בעולם התקון הוא
From this it will be understood why in Tiferes the vessel, too, is from the level of the Name Havayah, which is not so in the vessels of Chesed and Gevurah. For the essence of the inclusion that comes about in the World of Tikkun is
Now the question of paragraph 2 can be answered: why is even the vessel of Tiferes marked by the Name Havayah, while the vessels of Chesed and Gevurah bear the Names Kel and Elokim? The answer lies in what brings about the inclusion of the World of Tikkun.
¶2 This answers the question from paragraph 2.
through the middle line, which is the level of Tiferes, the attribute of Yaakov — “the completion of the Patriarchs,” “a dweller of tents” — which joins Chesed and Gevurah.
Chesed and Gevurah are opposites — giving and holding back. Tiferes is the “middle line” that joins them. It is the attribute of Yaakov, called in the Zohar “the completion of the Patriarchs” because he unites Avraham’s Chesed and Yitzchak’s Gevurah, and in the Torah “a dweller of tents.”
ולכן יעקב המשיך בחי׳ עקודים נקודים וברודים4 שהמשיך מבחי׳ עקודים גם בברודים ע״י שם מ״ה [שם מ״ה] להיות התכללות כו׳
Therefore Yaakov drew forth the level of akudim, nekudim and berudim [— “streaked, speckled and spotted”]: he drew from the level of Akudim into Berudim as well, through the Name Mah, so that there would be inclusion, etc.
Yaakov’s wages from Lavan were the marked young of the flock (Genesis 30:32; 31:8), and in a dream he saw the rams that mounted the flock “streaked, speckled and spotted,” akudim, nekudim u-verudim (31:10): the very names of the three stages of the Sefiros. The Alter Rebbe reads Yaakov’s drawing forth of these flocks as Tiferes drawing the oneness of Akudim down into Berudim through the Name Mah, so bringing about inclusion.
ולכן תפארת נק׳ אות אמת56 (עי׳ [עיין] בזוהר ר״פ ויקרא)7 מפני שמחבר ועושה התכללות שלא יהיו המדות חו״ג [חסד וגבורה] נגדיים זה לזה.
Therefore Tiferes is called “a sign of truth” (see the Zohar, at the beginning of Parshas Vayikra), because it joins and brings about inclusion, so that the attributes, Chesed and Gevurah, should not be opposed to one another.
The Zohar (at the start of Parshas Vayikra) reads Rachav’s request, “give me a sign of truth,” as the letter vav, the letter of Tiferes; the Hebrew os means both “sign” and “letter,” so it is also “a letter of truth.” Truth here means what joins and does not take sides: Tiferes brings Chesed and Gevurah together so that they no longer oppose each other.
Now, “the great, the mighty” is the level of Chesed and Gevurah, and “the awesome” is the level of Tiferes; and it has an added vav: “and the awesome” (ve-hanora),
In the phrase “the great, the mighty and the awesome,” “great” is Chesed and “mighty” is Gevurah, while “awesome” is Tiferes. Only the last word has an added vav — “and the awesome.”
שנמשך המשכה עליונה שעי״ז נעשה ההתכללות וכענין הנ״ל דהתקון וההתכללות הוא ע״י המשכת שם מ״ה [שם מ״ה] וכן ביעקב נאמר מה נורא המקום הזה.10
[meaning] that a supernal flow is drawn down, through which the inclusion comes about — as in the matter mentioned above, that the Tikkun and the inclusion come through drawing down the Name Mah. And so of Yaakov it is said, “How (mah) awesome is this place!”
The vav, a straight line, is the letter of drawing down. Its presence in “and the awesome” shows that Tiferes draws down a higher flow, which is what brings about inclusion — just as the Name Mah does. Fittingly, Yaakov says of the place of his vision, “How (mah) awesome is this place!”, combining mah and “awesome.”
וזהו דבכלי הת״ת [התפארת] הוא מאיר שם הוי״ה שהוא הארה גדולה ונעלית יותר מבכלים דחו״ג [דחסד וגבורה] והיינו
And this is why in the vessel of Tiferes the Name Havayah shines, which is an illumination greater and more exalted than in the vessels of Chesed and Gevurah. That is,
That is why the Name Havayah shines even in the vessel of Tiferes: its vessel carries a greater light than the vessels of Chesed and Gevurah.
כי ע״י שם הוי״ה נמשך בחי׳ ההתכללות וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] הוי״ה אחד11 (ועמ״ש ע״פ לתת נקמת הוי״ה במדין).12
through the Name Havayah the level of inclusion is drawn forth; and this is [the meaning of] what is said, “Havayah is One” (and see what is written on [the verse] “to execute the vengeance of Havayah upon Midian”).
Havayah is the Name through which inclusion is drawn down, which is why Scripture says “Havayah is One.” The Alter Rebbe refers to his maamar on the war against Midian (Likkutei Torah, Matot 6:20–21): Midian, strife and division, is the very opposite of Havayah, whose essence is peace and inclusion, and through inclusion a higher light is drawn from the level that includes everything; so that war was “the vengeance of Havayah.”
והנה התורה נק׳ תורת הוי״ה13 כי בתורה כתיב וכל נתיבותיה שלום14 וכמ״ש או יחזיק במעוזי15 יעשה שלום לי וגו׳
Now the Torah is called “the Torah of Havayah,” for of the Torah it is written, “and all its paths are peace”; and as it is written, “Or let him take hold of My strength, that he may make peace with Me,” etc. —
The Torah is called “the Torah of Havayah” because it is all about peace: “all its paths are peace.” The Sages read the verse “let him take hold of My strength (the Torah), that he may make peace with Me” as referring to one who studies Torah.
שלום בפמליא של מעלה ובפמליא של מטה16 שיהי׳ [שיהיה] בחי׳ ההתכללות ויחוד הספירות וההיכלות ועי״ז יומשך גילוי אור א״ס ב״ה. והתכללות זו הוא ע״י הבטול.
peace in the heavenly household and in the earthly household: that there be the level of inclusion and unification of the Sefiros and the chambers (heichalos), and through this the revelation of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, will be drawn down. And this inclusion is through self-nullification (bittul).
The Sages say that such a person makes peace in the heavenly household and in the earthly household. In Kabbalistic terms, this peace is the inclusion and union of the Sefiros and of the heichalos (the “chambers” of the lower worlds), and through it the Infinite Light is revealed. And inclusion comes only through bittul.
וזהו יסוד כל התורה להיות בטול היש לאין וכל השלשה דברים שעליהם העולם עומד היינו תורה ועבודה וגמ״ח [וגמילות חסדים]17 כולם ענינם בטול היש לאין וע״י הבטול נעשה ההתכללות משא״כ בבחי׳ יש כו׳.
And this is the foundation of the entire Torah: to be the nullification of the “something” into the “nothing.” And all three things on which the world stands — namely Torah, service and acts of kindness — are all, in their essence, the nullification of the “something” into the “nothing.” And through bittul the inclusion comes about, which is not so at the level of “something,” etc.
This is the heart of the whole Torah: to set aside one’s own separate “something” (yesh) before G‑d’s “nothing” (ayin), G‑dliness, called “nothing” because it is beyond all grasp. The three pillars on which the world stands — Torah, prayer (“service”) and acts of kindness — all serve this purpose. Only when there is bittul can separate things truly join; while each insists on its own existence, they cannot.
The paragraph answers the opening question: Tiferes, Yaakov’s attribute, joins Chesed and Gevurah and brings about inclusion; since inclusion draws on the Name Havayah, Havayah shines even in its vessel. This inclusion depends on bittul, which is the foundation of the Torah and of Torah, service and kindness.
The Tzemach Tzedek (Or HaTorah, Inyanim) explains that although the light of Keser shines in the two side lines too (Chochmah–Chesed–Netzach and Binah–Gevurah–Hod), they are not called Havayah; only the middle line, which joins them, is. The Zohar the note quotes reads “Give me a sign of truth” as the letter vav: all the letters are true, but this one is called “the sign of truth.”
TermsTiferesHiskallelusAkudimGimmel kavin+18
- Tiferes תפארת explained hereIn the world of tikkun the inclusion of the middos comes mainly through the middle line, Tiferes, Yaakov’s attribute, which joins Chesed and Gevurah so they are not opposed to each other; therefore it is called “a sign of truth,” and the Name Havayah shines even in its vessel, which is not so in the vessels of Chesed and Gevurah (Noach 4:2).
עיקר ההתכללות הנעשה בעולם התקון הוא ע״י קו האמצעי שהוא בחי׳ תפארת מדתו של יעקב
- Hiskallelus התכללות explained hereHere inter-inclusion in Tikkun comes chiefly through the middle line, Tiferes, Yaakov’s trait, joining Chesed and Gevurah by drawing the Name Mah; it comes through bittul, not yesh.
כי הנה עיקר ההתכללות הנעשה בעולם התקון הוא ע״י קו האמצעי שהוא בחי׳ תפארת
- Akudim עקודים נקודים וברודים
- Gimmel kavin ג׳ קוין
- Bittul hayesh ביטול היש
- Shalom שלום
- Heichalos היכלות
- Yesod יסוד
- Mah and Ban מ״ה וב״ן
- Sefiros ספירות
- Tohu and Tikkun תהו ותקון
- Avodas Hashem עבודת ה׳
- Yichud יחוד
- Lights and vessels אורות וכלים
- Yud-hei and vav-hei י״ה ו״ה
- Yesh and ayin יש ואין
- Middos מדות
Marei mekomos
- 1דבתפארת בהכלי ג״כ הוא מבחי׳ שם הוי״ה · וע׳ מזה בלקו״ת פ׳ תזריע בד״ה אם בהרת קדמה. ובד״ה החלצו מאתכם בענין לתת נקמת הוי׳ במדין שע״י ההתכללות דוקא זהו כלי לגילוי אוא״ס. — אוה״ת כרך ו שם תתרסד, ב ובלקו״ת לג״פ פ׳ נח עה, ד. ראה באוה״ת ענינים ע׳ קעב שמבאר הגם שבב׳ הקוין חח״נ ובג״ה מאיר אור הכתר ואעפ״כ לא יקראו בשם הוי׳ ע״ש.
- 2יעקב שלימו דאבהן · Zohar I, 171a
- 3ישב אוהלים · Genesis 25:27
- 4יעקב המשיך בחי׳ עקודים נקודים וברודים · Genesis 31:10
- 5תפארת נק׳ אות אמת · Joshua 2:12
- 6אות אמת · Zohar, Vayikra 1:1–7
- 7ע׳ בזהר ר״פ ויקרא · ”ע״פ ונתתם לי אות אמת דא אות וי״ו ואי תימא שאר אתוון לאו אינון אמת אין אלא אות דא אות אמת אקרי” — אוה״ת ענינים ע׳ קעד. וראה גם בביאוה״ז להצ״צ כרך א ע׳ שיג ואילך.
- 8הגדול הגבור · Deuteronomy 10:17
- 9ויש בו תוספות וי״ו והנורא · ראה לקו״ת ואתחנן ח, א. אוה״ת ענינים ע׳ קעא ואילך בארוכה.
- 10מה נורא המקום הזה · Genesis 28:17
- 11הוי״ה אחד · Deuteronomy 6:4
- 12לתת נקמת הוי״ה במדין · Numbers 31:3
- 13תורת הוי״ה · Psalms 19:8
- 14וכל נתיבותי׳ שלום · Proverbs 3:17
- 15או יחזיק במעוזי · Isaiah 27:5
- 16שלום בפמליא של מעלה ובפמליא של מטה · Sanhedrin 99b:10–11
- 17השלשה דברים שעליהם העולם עומד היינו תורה ועבודה וגמ״ח · Pirkei Avot 1:2
The builders’ scheme and G‑d’s response ¶13–17
13והנה דור הפלגה אמרו ונעשה לנו שם1 פן נפוץ כו׳ פי׳ שרצו ג״כ שיקבלו השפע מבחי׳ שם2 הוי״ה שהוא המשכה עליונה.
Now the generation of the Dispersion said, “And let us make ourselves a name, lest we be scattered,” etc. The meaning is that they, too, wanted to receive the flow from the level of the Name Havayah, which is a supernal drawing-down.
Now the Alter Rebbe returns to the Tower. “Let us make ourselves a name” means they wanted their flow of blessing to come from the Name Havayah — the supernal flow that, as just explained, is the source of inclusion.
וזהו ונעשה לנו שם פן נפוץ פי׳ שלא רצו שיומשך להם ההשפעה מבחי׳ שלמטה במדרגה שמשם יניקת החיצונים שיניקתם מאחוריים דשם אלקים ונק׳ לכך אלקים אחרים כו׳
And this is [the meaning of] “And let us make ourselves a name, lest we be scattered”: that is, they did not want the flow to be drawn to them from a level lower in rank, from which the external forces draw their nourishment — for their nourishment is from the hind-part of the Name Elokim, and therefore they are called “other gods” (elokim acherim), etc.
The maamar reads “lest we be scattered” as their refusal to receive from a lower level, from which the “external forces” — the forces of kelipah that oppose holiness — draw their nourishment. These forces are fed from the “hind-part,” the most external aspect, of the Name Elokim, which is why idolatry is called elokim acherim, “other gods.”
כי זהו כל עיקר מעלת עולם התקון שהוא בחי׳ ההתכללות ולכן נאמר גבי יעקב שבעים נפש3 לשון יחיד משא״כ בעולם התהו מחמת שלא היה התכללות נמשך שבה״כ [שבירת הכלים].
For this is the entire essence of the superiority of the World of Tikkun: that it is the level of inclusion. Therefore of Yaakov it is said, “seventy soul” (nefesh), in the singular; which is not so in the World of Tohu, where, because there was no inclusion, the shattering of the vessels followed.
The advantage of Tikkun is inclusion. The Torah counts Yaakov’s family as “seventy nefesh” — “soul” in the singular — because they were united as one. In the World of Tohu there was no such inclusion, and so its vessels shattered.
The paragraph explains “let us make ourselves a name”: the builders wanted to receive from the Name Havayah, the high source of inclusion, rather than from a lower level that feeds the forces opposed to holiness.
The Tzemach Tzedek (Or HaTorah, Devarim) adds that they wanted the letters of G‑dliness that give them life to remain only as an encompassing (makif) influence over them, not to shine within them.
TermsPanim and achorTohu and TikkunKelipahYud-hei and vav-hei+4
- Panim and achor פנים ואחור
- Tohu and Tikkun תהו ותקון
- Kelipah קליפה
- Yud-hei and vav-hei י״ה ו״ה
- Elokim אלקים
- Hiskallelus התכללות
Marei mekomos
- 1ונעשה לנו שם · Genesis 11:4
- 2פי׳ שרצו ג״כ שיקבלו השפע מבחי׳ שם הוי׳ · ראה באוה״ת דברים כרך ו פ׳ תצא ע׳ ב׳שנג ”שרצו שיהי׳ אותיות אלקות המחיה אותם רק בבחי׳ מקיף לבד עליהם ושלא יאיר בפנימיות” ע״ש.
- 3נאמר גבי יעקב שבעים נפש · Genesis 46:27
14ואמנם הם ידעו1 יא, באשר לקבל מעולם התקון הוא ע״י בטול היש כנ״ל בענין התקון ע״י שם מ״ה [שם מ״ה] והם לא רצו בזה
However, they knew that to receive from the World of Tikkun is through the nullification of the “something,” as [explained] above concerning the Tikkun through the Name Mah; and they did not want this.
The builders knew that receiving from the World of Tikkun requires bittul, as shown above: inclusion comes through the Name Mah, which is self-nullification. That is exactly what they refused to do.
וכמ״ש בלק״ת [בלקוטי תורה (להאריז״ל)] להרח״ו [להרבי חיים ויטאל] ז״ל [זכרונו לברכה / זכרונם לברכה] שרצו לילך בשרירות לבם ושאעפ״כ [ושאף על פי כן] יומשך להם השפעת טובה כו׳ ע״כ נתחכמו לעשות המגדל והעיר.
And as is written in the Likkutei Torah of Rabbi Chaim Vital, of blessed memory: that they wanted to go in the stubbornness of their heart, and nevertheless have a flow of good drawn to them, etc. Therefore they cleverly contrived to make the tower and the city.
As Rabbi Chaim Vital wrote in his Likkutei Torah (paragraph 1), they wanted to follow their own desires and still receive blessing. So they devised a clever way around the requirement: the city and the tower.
The builders’ problem: blessing from the World of Tikkun requires bittul, which they would not accept, so they sought a way to receive without it.
TermsBittul hayeshMah and BanTohu and Tikkun+1
- Bittul hayesh ביטול היש
- Mah and Ban מ״ה וב״ן
- Tohu and Tikkun תהו ותקון
Also Bittul
Marei mekomos
- 1ואמנם הם ידעו · אוה״ת תבוא ע׳ תתרעב.
15והוא שנתייעצו שע״י האחדות שיהיה ביניהם להיות חבור עצבים1 ע״כ עי״ז ימשיכו להם טובה והשפעה גשמית עכ״פ [על כל פנים] אף אם לא יהיה להם הבטול ועבודת השי״ת [השם יתברך].
That is, they took counsel that through the unity there would be among them — to be “joined together [though] to idols” — through this they would draw to themselves good and a material flow at least, even if they would not have bittul and the service of G‑d, blessed be He.
Their plan was unity. In Hosea the words mean that Ephraim, the northern kingdom, is attached to idols, “let him be”; the Midrash (Bereshis Rabbah 38:6, on this very generation) reads chavur as “joined together”: even idol-worshippers who are at peace with one another are left alone. The builders hoped their unity alone would bring them at least material blessing, without bittul or serving G‑d.
והיינו כי ידעו בכח שמוש השמות עליונים שבבחי׳ התכללות מאיר אור עליון ביותר וכמש״ל [וכמה שכתוב לעיל] בענין עקודים בכלי א׳ שהוא בחי׳ ומדרגה גבוה מאד שהוא למעלה מעולם התהו ומעולם התקון.
That is, they knew, through the power of using the supernal Names, that in a state of inclusion a most supernal light shines — as explained above concerning Akudim in one vessel, which is a very high level and rank, above the World of Tohu and the World of Tikkun.
Through their knowledge of the holy Names they understood that inclusion draws down a very high light — like Akudim, where all is in one vessel, a level above both Tohu and Tikkun.
The builders’ strategy: they meant to draw blessing through unity, which by its nature draws a very high light, without the bittul that holiness requires.
The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research
Background from the Rebbe
In a sicha of Shabbos Parshas Bo, 8 Shevat 5746, the Shabbos before Yud Shevat, asking that the gatherings on the Rebbe Rayatz’s yahrzeit be filled with „אהבת ואחדות ישראל” (the love and unity of Israel) he asked for, the Rebbe notes that this is hinted in the Rebbe Rayatz’s maamar Basi LeGani (באתי לגני), which sets all of avodah as „ושכנתי בתוכם” (“I will dwell among them”) (the vessel for the Shechinah, he adds, is unity), and in a further note that the First Temple too fell through a lack of unity.
This paragraph brings „חבור עצבים אפרים” (“Ephraim is joined to idols, let him be”): unity itself draws a flow from above, even without bittul. In a note the Rebbe argues that, although Yoma says only the Second Temple fell through baseless hatred (שנאת חנם), the destruction of the First Temple too must have come from a lack of unity, pointing to this passage and to Or HaTorah there on “joined to idols”: „שהיו יוצאין למלחמה ונוצחין, שהאחדות הייתה שוללת נצחון האויב” (they went out to war and won, for their unity ruled out the enemy’s victory).
The Alter Rebbe
שע״י האחדות שיהיה ביניהם להיות חבור עצבים ע״כ עי״ז ימשיכו להם טובה והשפעה גשמית
The Rebbe
בענין ”חבור עצבים אפרים” שהיו יוצאין למלחמה ונוצחין, שהאחדות הייתה שוללת נצחון האויב
Likkutei Sichos, vol. כו, p. 329 (the starred note at the foot of the page; the sicha begins on p. 328) · משיחת ש״פ בא, ח׳ שבט ה׳תשמ״ו, the Shabbos before Yud Shevat (running head p. 329; the unedited original: Sichos Kodesh 5746 vol. 2 pp. 479–483)
Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made
TermsAkudimAchdus HashemTohu and TikkunHiskallelus+1
- Akudim עקודים נקודים וברודים
- Achdus Hashem אחדות השם
- Tohu and Tikkun תהו ותקון
- Hiskallelus התכללות
Also Bittul
Marei mekomos
- 1חבור עצבים · Hosea 4:17
16וע״כ אמרו ונעשה לנו שם שימשיכו ג״כ משם הוי״ה דהיינו ממקום הכולל לכל ההשתלשלות בשוה שהוא אור כללי כנ״ל
Therefore they said, “And let us make ourselves a name”: that they would draw also from the Name Havayah, that is, from the place that includes the entire chain of descent (hishtalshelus) equally, which is an all-inclusive light, as [stated] above,
“Let us make ourselves a name” means drawing from the Name Havayah, the all-inclusive light that relates equally to every level of the chain of descent — a level above the distinctions of the worlds.
ולא יצטרכו להיות נכנעים תח״י [תחת יד] הקדושה דעולם התקון דאצי׳ שמשם א״א להם לקבל רק מבחי׳ חיצוניות כו׳.
and they would not need to be subdued under the holiness of the World of Tikkun of Atzilus, from which it is impossible for them to receive except from the level of the outer dimension (chitzoniyus), etc.
That way they would not have to submit to the holiness of Atzilus, the World of Tikkun. From Atzilus the unholy can receive only its outermost aspect, and only by being subdued; they wanted to bypass that submission.
Their aim was to draw from the all-inclusive light of Havayah and so avoid submitting to the holiness of Atzilus.
TermsChitzoniyusTohu and TikkunYud-hei and vav-heiHishtalshelus+2
- Chitzoniyus חיצוניות
- Tohu and Tikkun תהו ותקון
- Yud-hei and vav-hei י״ה ו״ה
- Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
- Atzilus אצילות
Also Havayah
17והיינו ע״י האחדות1 וההתכללות שיהיה ביניהם ולכן עשו העיר ומגדל23 דהיינו שהיה סימן להם שלא יתפרדו איש מעל אחיו
That is, through the unity and inclusion there would be among them. Therefore they made the city and the tower: that is, it was a sign for them that they would not separate one from another,
The city and tower were the means to that unity: a landmark that would keep them together as one people.
כי רועי צאן היו זה הולך אנה וזה אנה ע״כ עשו עיר ומגדל גבוה כדי שיתקבצו כולם שם ולא יפרדו איש מעל אחיו וכמ״ש הראב״ע [הרבי אברהם אבן עזרא].4
for they were shepherds, this one going here and that one going there; therefore they made a city and a tall tower, so that they would all gather there and not separate one from another, as Rabbi Avraham ibn Ezra writes.
Ibn Ezra explains the plain meaning: they were shepherds who wandered in all directions, so they built a city and a tall tower where all could gather and stay together.
וגם ע״פ רוחניות ג״כ ענין העיר והמגדל היה לתועלת החבור והיחוד (ע׳ [עיין] בזוהר פ׳ נח דף ע״ד5 ע״ה).
And according to the spiritual [dimension] too, the matter of the city and the tower was for the purpose of joining and unification (see the Zohar, Parshas Noach, pages 74 and 75).
The Zohar on Parshas Noach (1:74b–75b) explains this on the spiritual level: the holy Name takes hold on earth only through “a city and a tower,” the builders used that wisdom to set one up for the other side, and because they were all together, in their unity they would succeed.
And this is what the Holy One, blessed be He, said: “Behold, [they are] one people, and one language for them all,” etc., “and now nothing that they have schemed to do will be withheld from them.”
Now G‑d’s words, quoted at the start, become clear: because they are “one people with one language,” nothing they plan will be beyond them.
פי׳ כי לפי שבאמת ע״י ההתכללות והחבור נמשך ממקום עליון ביותר וכמ״ש חבור עצבים8 וגו׳
The meaning is: because in truth, through inclusion and joining, [a flow] is drawn from a most supernal place — as it is written, “joined together [though] to idols,” etc. —
Unity really does draw down light from a very high place, as the verse about Ephraim “joined together” to idols shows. That is why G‑d could say that nothing would be withheld from them. It was not that they could override His will, but that unity itself draws a flow from on high, and G‑d had made it so.
¶1 This answers the question from paragraph 1.
וא״כ לא יבצר מהם כו׳ וא״כ הרי ח״ו [חס ושלום] ימשיכו המים היוצאים מבית ה׳ לבית הכסא כו׳
then “nothing will be withheld from them,” etc. And if so, then, G‑d forbid, they would draw the waters that go forth from the House of G‑d to the privy, etc.,
The danger, in the maamar’s image: they would draw this holy flow, the waters that go forth from the House of G‑d, into a privy, the most degraded of places.
אשת הזמה כו׳ כיון שהם היו הולכים בשרירות לבם9 כו׳ ולא רצו לקבל הבטול והעול
the lewd woman, etc. — since they were walking in the stubbornness of their heart, etc., and did not want to accept bittul and the yoke.
“The lewd woman, etc.” is a second image, which the text leaves unfinished, of holy power serving what is impure. This would happen because they followed their own desires and refused bittul and the yoke of Heaven.
(וזהו כעין מ״ש פן ישלח ידו10 ולקח גם מעץ החיים ואכל וחי לעולם ואין זה ראוי כיון שכבר נפגם ע״י עץ הדעת א״כ ימשיך תוקף זה דעץ החיים בסטרא אוחרא ויגביר הרע וכמ״ש במ״א וכך הוא כאן).
(And this is akin to what is written, “lest he put forth his hand and take also from the Tree of Life, and eat, and live forever”; and this is not fitting, since he had already been blemished through the Tree of Knowledge. If so, he would draw this strength of the Tree of Life into the sitra achra (the other side) and strengthen evil, as is written elsewhere; and so it is here.)
A parallel from the Garden of Eden: after Adam ate from the Tree of Knowledge, G‑d kept him from the Tree of Life. Once Adam was flawed, the power of the Tree of Life would have strengthened the “other side,” the forces opposed to holiness. The same danger existed with the builders of the Tower.
ועל כן הבה ונבלה שפתם11 כו׳ פיזור לרשעים הנאה להם והנאה לעולם.12 וכנוס לצדיקים שיש בהם הבטול להש״י [להשם יתברך] הנאה להם והנאה לעולם כי ע״י ההתכללות נמשך ממקום עליון כנ״ל ולכן השלום הוא הכלי המחזיק ברכה:13
Therefore, “Come, let us confound their language,” etc. “Dispersion for the wicked is pleasant for them and pleasant for the world”; and gathering for the righteous, who have bittul to G‑d, blessed be He, is pleasant for them and pleasant for the world — for through inclusion [a flow] is drawn from a supernal place, as [explained] above. And therefore peace is the vessel that holds blessing.
So G‑d confused their language. The Mishnah teaches that it is good for the world when the wicked are scattered and when the righteous gather. United, the righteous, who have bittul, draw blessing from above for everyone; hence the Sages’ saying that peace is the only vessel that can hold blessing.
The paragraph completes the answer: unity draws down a very high light, so the builders’ scheme could truly have succeeded; but since they rejected bittul, that light would have fed evil, and so G‑d scattered them. Unity is a blessing only among those who are nullified to G‑d.
In Likkutei Torah (Rosh Hashanah), to which the note points, the Alter Rebbe describes the “city” of the generation of the Dispersion as combinations of letters and flows drawn to the side opposed to holiness, and says that in the future, when all souls are elevated, the flow will no longer be drawn to such a “city.”
Explained elsewhere AI research
Explained by the Alter Rebbe, the editors of the Tzemach Tzedek’s Maamarim and the editors of Toras Menachem
„ימשיכו המים היוצאים מבית ה׳ לבית הכסא כו׳ אשת הזמה כו׳” (“They would draw the waters that go forth from the House of G‑d to the privy, etc., the lewd woman, etc.”): our commentary calls it “the maamar’s image” and says the text “leaves it unfinished”, but the words are a known formula.
The words echo a known confession, the “Seder Nezifah” printed with the annulment of vows in the Alter Rebbe’s Siddur (and in older siddurim): “I have cast a blemish in Your Sanctuary, and the waters that go forth from the House of G‑d I led from the House of the King to the privy, the place of filth, the lewd woman, Your enemy” (“the lewd woman” is from Ezekiel 23:44). Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) the Alter Rebbe abbreviates a formula his readers knew: the builders’ unity, without bittul, would have drawn the holy flow to the side opposed to holiness.
the Alter Rebbe: Siddur (Siddur im Likkutei Torah), Seder Hataras Nedarim, the ‘nezifah’, p. 508
השלכתי פגם במקדשך והמים היוצאים מבית ה׳ הולכתים מבית המלכות לבית הכסא מקום הטינופת אשת הזמה אויבתיך
the editors of the Tzemach Tzedek’s Maamarim (Hanachos, Bereishis–Chayei Sarah): Maamarei Admur HaTzemach Tzedek – Hanachos, p. קטו
המים היו יוצאים מבית ה׳: ע״פ נוסח ”סדר הנזיפה” (נדפס בסידורים ישנים, וגם בסידור אדה״ז בסדר התרת נדרים)
the editors of Toras Menachem (a note to an unedited transcript): Toras Menachem – Hisvaduyos 5725 vol. 2 (42), 19 Kislev 5725, p. 37, note 139 (unedited transcript; its notes are the editors’; the edited version, Likkutei Sichos 9 pp. 106–114, has no such line), p. 37
ובנוסח הידוע (בסדר נזיפה): ”המים היוצאים מבית ה׳ הולכתים לבית כו׳ מקום הטינופת כו׳”
Where the maamar leaves something unexplained, found by AI in the library and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.
The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research
Background from the Rebbe
In a letter of Erev Shabbos Parshas Shoftim 5717 to the first annual gathering of the alumni of the Tomchei Temimim yeshivos in America, the Rebbe explains the power of a gathering of those who keep the mitzvos.
This paragraph ends: „וכנוס לצדיקים שיש בהם הבטול להש״י הנאה להם והנאה לעולם” (a gathering of the righteous, who have bittul, is good for them and for the world), because joining draws from a supernal place. The Rebbe quotes it “in the words of our Rebbe, the Alter Rebbe”: „ע״י ההתכללות והחיבור נמשך ממקום עליון ביותר, ממקום הכולל לכל ההשתלשלות בשוה” (through inclusion and joining, a flow comes from the highest place, the place that includes all the chain of worlds equally). So, he writes, of such a gathering it can be said, as of the builders but in holiness, that „לא יבצר מהם” (nothing will be withheld from them).
The Alter Rebbe
וכנוס לצדיקים שיש בהם הבטול להש״י הנאה להם והנאה לעולם כי ע״י ההתכללות נמשך ממקום עליון
The Rebbe
ובלשון רבנו הזקן: ע״י ההתכללות והחיבור נמשך ממקום עליון ביותר, ממקום הכולל לכל ההשתלשלות בשוה. ולכן לא יבצר מהם ולא יפלא מהם — מכינוס שכזה
Likkutei Sichos, vol. כד, p. 483–484 (the quote on p. 484) · עש״ק אחר חצות, פ׳ כי יפלא ממך דבר (שופטים), ה׳תשי״ז
Background from the Rebbe
In the maamar “Ish al diglo b’osos l’veis avosam” of Shabbos Bamidbar, Mevarchim Sivan 5717, asking why Israel at Sinai longed for the banners (הדגלים) they saw among the angels when souls stand higher than angels, the Rebbe, following the Biurei HaZohar of the Mitteler Rebbe and the Tzemach Tzedek, connects that longing with the generation of the Dispersion.
Our paragraph says the builders’ unity would have drawn from the highest place, which is why „ועתה לא יבצר מהם” (“nothing will be withheld from them”), but without bittul it would have fed the other side, so G‑d scattered them. In Ish al Diglo 5717 the Rebbe restates this „כמבואר בארוכה בחסידות” (“as explained at length in Chassidus”), in the paragraph’s own words, and gives its sequel, following the Tzemach Tzedek: „שהנשמות של הדור שיצאו ממצרים היו גלגול דור ההפלגה” (the souls of the generation that left Egypt were the generation of the Dispersion returned), and they longed for the banners, „האחדות בקדושה” (“unity in holiness”), to repair that generation’s sin.
The Alter Rebbe
ע״כ עשו עיר ומגדל גבוה כדי שיתקבצו כולם שם ולא יפרדו איש מעל אחיו וכמ״ש הראב״ע
The Rebbe
כמבואר בארוכה בחסידות שרצו להמשיך מקום נעלה ביותר, עי״ז שיהיו באחדות, שלכן עשו העיר ומגדל כדי שיתקבצו כולם שם ולא יפרדו איש מעל אחיו
Sefer HaMaamarim 5717 (new edition, unedited), vol. תשי״ז, p. רכו (the maamar begins on p. רכג) · ש״פ במדבר, מבה״ח סיון, ה׳תשי״ז (הנחה בלתי מוגה)
Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made
TermsEtz HaDaasShalomAchdus HashemTzaddik+5
- Etz HaDaas עץ הדעת טוב ורע
- Shalom שלום
- Achdus Hashem אחדות השם
- Tzaddik צדיק
- Yichud יחוד
- Daas דעת
- Berachah ברכה
- Hiskallelus התכללות
Also Bittul
Marei mekomos
- 1והיינו ע״י האחדות והתכללות · ראה ד״ה תורה צוה תרנ״ד.
- 2ולכן עשו העיר ומגדל · ראה אוה״ת נצבים ע׳ א׳רפא.
- 3עיר ומגדל · Zohar, Noach 42:335–341
- 4וכמ״ש הראב״ע · ”שהכוונה שלהם בבנין עיר ומגדל כדי שיהי׳ להם אחדות, ע״כ עשו עיר ומגדל כדי שיתקבצו שם כולם ולא יפרדו איש מעל אחיו, וע״י האחדות שלהם היו יכולים להמשיך טובה והשפעה גשמי׳ אף שלא יהי׳ להם הביטול ועבודת השי״ת” — סה״מ תר״ל ע׳ ז. ראה גם תו״ח כאן סג, ד.
- 5ע׳ בזהר פ׳ נח דף ע״ד · ראה הלשון במאמרי אדה״ז פרשיות ע׳ סב. אוה״ת בראשית כרך ו תתרע, א. בהמשך זאת חנוכת המזבח תר״מ סעי׳ יד. ובאוה״ת נ״ך כרך א ע׳ תקג. זהר זה נזכר בלקו״ת ר״ה ס, ב.
- 6הן עם אחד · Genesis 11:6
- 7הן עם אחד ושפה אחת לכולם · Zohar, Noach 43:361–44:373
- 8חבור עצבים · Hosea 4:17
- 9שהם היו הולכם בשרירות לבם · קטע מובא באוה״ת פ׳ בלק ע׳ א׳יז.
- 10פן ישלח ידו · Genesis 3:22
- 11הבה ונבלה שפתם · Genesis 11:7
- 12פיזור לרשעים הנאה להם והנאה לעולם · Mishnah Sanhedrin 8:5
- 13השלום הוא הכלי המחזיק ברכה · Mishnah Oktzin 3:12
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
Each Rosh Chodesh the names of those learning here are brought to the Ohel. Add your name, and mark what you learn so it is counted.
In one’s avodah
Unity draws down the highest blessing, but only unity grounded in bittul — setting aside one’s own “something” before G‑d — is holy. Torah, service and acts of kindness are all ways of bittul, and through them a person makes peace above and below; peace among those nullified to G‑d is the vessel that holds blessing.
Questions for discussion
- How does the maamar answer the question of how the builders could have succeeded “against G‑d’s will”?
- Why is the Chochmah of Atzilus called “a known wisdom,” even though it is far above the wisdom of the lower worlds?
- How does the analogy of the soul’s powers — one in the soul, divided in the body — illuminate the difference between Akudim and Atzilus?
- Why does inclusion depend on bittul, and why does the Name Mah bring it about?
- If unity draws blessing even for those “joined to idols,” why is it good for the wicked to be scattered? What does this teach about the unity we should seek?
Key terms in this maamar
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- The Sefirah of kindness (the right arm; Avraham): giving that comes from its nature to do good, spreading from highest to lowest like water. Gevurah, its opposite, limits it; in tikkun each includes the other. ×10Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
- The Sefirah of might (the left; Yitzchak), opposite Chesed: described as what limits and contracts Chesed’s flow, and as the life-force in greater intensity, which becomes judgment; included in Chesed, it gives life. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
- The Sefirah of the middle line (Yaakov’s attribute) between Chesed and Gevurah: it joins and includes them, so Or Ein Sof shines in it constantly. It is mercy and truth, and is rooted in Keser. ×7Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Name meaning “He brings into being”: by contraction and expansion, its four letters, He brings all worlds into being while Himself unchanged; was, is and will be are one to Him. Elokim conceals it.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- The Name of contraction and concealment, the shield and sheath over Havayah, through which creation appears separate (yesh) and runs as nature (hateva, numerically Elokim). Relative to a higher revelation, Havayah counts as Elokim. ×3Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The Sefirosספירות
- Ten emanated powers, Keser (or Daas) and Chochmah through Malchus, each a light in a vessel; through them G‑d conducts the worlds, His essence unchanged; they recur in every world and in man. ×3Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first Sefirah of revelation: a single point of insight (koach mah, the yud of Havayah) that comes from the “nothing” above it; being bittul, Or Ein Sof rests in it, and Binah expands it. ×42Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- The Sefirah of comprehension (Imma, the first hei): it expands Chochmah’s flash in length and breadth; letters of thought appear in it; it is “yesh,” and from it love, joy and the middos are born. ×6Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- The boundless light radiating from G‑d’s Essence like sunlight from the sun: His “Name,” a revelation, not the Essence. Chiefly the light before the tzimtzum; also that light as clothed in the sefiros.Where it’s explained, stated differently, Sefer HaErchim
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The first revelation in the chain of worlds (vayaetzel, “drew off”): the ten Sefiros, where Or Ein Sof rests and lights and vessels are one with Him; Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah are created from nothing. ×3Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first created world, below the partition (parsa) under Atzilus: something new from nothing (yesh me’ayin), corresponding to thought, where Binah of Atzilus dwells; world of the seraphim, souls and Gan Eden HaElyon. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of formation, between Beriah and Asiyah: like speech, it reveals what was hidden in Beriah (something from something, not new creation); the middos of Atzilus shine there; the world of the angels.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest of the four worlds, corresponding to action: its ten Sefiros are still holy, but below them lies kelipas nogah; this physical world is Malchus of Asiyah, its lowest level.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The descent of levels from cause to effect, linked like the rings of a chain, from Chochmah downward; each reveals what was hidden in the one above. Or Ein Sof itself is above this order. ×3Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Abba and Imma (Chochmah and Binah)אבא ואמא
- Chochmah and Binah as father and mother, who beget the middos (love and awe, “son and daughter”). Abba is self-nullifying insight, source of the chassadim; Imma is comprehension, source of the gevuros.Where it’s explained, stated differently, Sefer HaErchim
- Tzimtzum (contraction)צמצום
- Contraction: Or Ein Sof (not Ein Sof Himself) hidden in its source so finite worlds can exist, leaving a “vacated space” for the kav; also each later narrowing of light, as in Chochmah. ×4Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- The emotive powers (in the soul: love, fear, mercy). Born from the intellect and matching its measure, they are rooted above it, in the will; above, the middos of Z”A, emanated to conduct the worlds. ×3Where it’s explained
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- The name for G‑d as without end or limit, beyond all grasp; what is drawn from Him is Or Ein Sof, only a radiance; all revelation comes from Malchus of Ein Sof.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The kav (line of light)קו
- The thread-like line of Or Ein Sof drawn into the vacated space after the tzimtzum: a small revelation, root of all hishtalshelus and the inner light, narrowing as it descends until it ends in Atzilus. ×5Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The reshimu (impression)רשימו
- The impression left after the tzimtzum: the letters that remained without the light revealed through them. Also any impression a light leaves after it passes, as of love after prayer. ×3Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Z'eir Anpin (the emotive attributes)ז״א
- The partzuf of the six middos of Atzilus (Chesed to Yesod), born from Imma and filled out by the mochin of Abba and Imma; Nukva’s masculine partner, through which the light reaches her. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The intellect (mochin)מוחין
- The intellect, Chochmah, Binah and Daas, as the “brains” of a level; chiefly the light of Abba and Imma clothed in Z’eir Anpin, the middos, by which they grow.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
- G‑d’s Malchus as it “dwells” among created beings to give them life: Malchus of Atzilus come down below Atzilus. Its being clothed below, down to the kelipos, is called the exile of the Shechinah.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Self-nullification before G‑d, the condition for the Or Ein Sof to rest. Its lower degree is a “something” that bows; its higher, Chochmah’s “what are we,” takes up no place at all.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The outer dimension (chitzoniyus)חיצוניות
- The outer dimension of a level: the part that goes out to give to others, as against pnimiyus, which cleaves to the source. Only the outer descends, becoming the inner of the level below. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The sitra achra (the other side)סטרא אחרא
- “The other side,” the opposite of holiness: what appears as a yesh separate from G‑d and casts off His yoke. It has no life of its own but receives it from holiness.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- Aramaic, “the Holy One, blessed be He”: G‑d as holy, set apart from the worlds, paired with Shechinteh, His indwelling; read as sovev kol almin, Z’eir Anpin, Atzmus, and sometimes memalei kol almin. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently